Preliminary Offering Circular, dated February 27, 2025

An offering statement pursuant to Regulation A relating to these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained in this Preliminary Offering Circular is subject to completion or amendment. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted before the offering statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is qualified. This Preliminary Offering Circular shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor may there be any sales of these securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful before registration or qualification under the laws of any such state. We may elect to satisfy our obligation to deliver a Final Offering Circular by sending you a notice within two business days after the completion of our sale to you that contains the URL where the Final Offering Circular or the offering statement in which such Final Offering Circular was filed may be obtained.

2,222,222 Units

Consisting of an Aggregate of

2,222,222 Common Shares

and

2,222,222 Warrants to Purchase One Common Share

2,222,222 Common Shares Issuable upon the Exercise of the Warrants

Medicus Pharma Ltd.

We are offering on a “best efforts” basis a maximum of 2,222,222 units (each, a "Unit") at a fixed price between $3.50 to $5.50 per Unit (to be fixed by post-qualification supplement). Each Unit consists of one common share of Medicus Pharma Ltd. (the "Company"), no par value, and one warrant to purchase one common share (each, a "warrant"), for an aggregate offering of 2,222,222 common shares and 2,222,222 warrants, pursuant to Tier 2 of Regulation A of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Each warrant is immediately exercisable for one of our common shares at an exercise price of $                  per share and will expire five years from the date of issuance. The Units will not be certificated and the common shares and warrants comprising the Units are immediately separable and will be issued separately in this offering. Pursuant to this offering circular, we are also offering the 2,222,222 common shares issuable from time to time upon the exercise of the warrants offered hereby.

______________________

Our common shares and public warrants, with an exercise price of $4.64 and expiration date of November 15, 2029 (the “Public Warrants”) are listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market (the “Nasdaq”), under the symbols "MDCX" and "MDCXW," respectively. The warrants offered hereby will not trade on any U.S. securities exchange and we will not apply for listing on any U.S. securities exchange. Therefore, without an active trading market for the warrants, the liquidity of such warrants will be limited.

The closing price of our common shares and Public Warrants on the Nasdaq on February 26, 2025 were $4.04 and $1.02, respectively.

We are an "emerging growth company" and a "smaller reporting company" under applicable U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules and will be eligible for reduced public company disclosure requirements. See "Offering Circular Summary-Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company" and "Offering Circular Summary-Implications of Being a Smaller Reporting Company." 

______________________

This offering is being conducted on a “best-efforts” basis, which means that there is no minimum number of Units that must be sold by us for this offering to close; thus, we may receive no or minimal proceeds from this offering. None of the proceeds received will be placed in an escrow or trust account. All proceeds from this offering will become immediately available to us and may be used as they are accepted. Purchasers of the Units will not be entitled to a refund and could lose their entire investments.

We estimate that this offering will commence within two days of SEC qualification; this offering will terminate at the earliest of (a) the date on which the maximum offering has been sold, (b) one year from the date of SEC qualification, or (c) the date on which this offering is earlier terminated by us, in our sole discretion. See “Plan of Distribution”.

Investing in our securities involves risks. See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 9 of this offering circular.

(1) We have engaged Maxim Group LLC and Brookline Capital Markets, a division of Arcadia Securities, LLC (together, the “Placement Agents”) to act as placement agents for this offering, in exchange for a fee of 7.5% of the aggregate offering price of the Units sold in this offering.

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not pass upon the merits of or give its approval to any securities offered or the terms of the offering, nor does it pass upon the accuracy or completeness of any offering circular or other solicitation materials. These securities are offered pursuant to an exemption from registration with the SEC; however, the SEC has not made an independent determination that the securities offered are exempt from registration.

Generally, no sale may be made to you in this offering if the aggregate purchase price you pay is more than 10% of the greater of your annual income or net worth. Different rules apply to accredited investors and non-natural persons. Before making any representation that your investment does not exceed applicable thresholds, we encourage you to review Rule 251(d)(2)(i)(C) of Regulation A. For general information on investing, we encourage you to refer to www.investor.gov.

This offering circular follows the disclosure format of Form S-1, pursuant to the General Instructions of Part II(a)(1)(ii) of Form 1-A.

______________________

The date of this offering circular is              , 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- i -

Neither we, nor the Placement Agents have authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than the information contained in this offering circular, any amendment or supplement to this offering circular or in any free writing offering circular prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we may have referred you. We and the Placement Agents take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. We and the Placement Agents have not authorized any other person to provide you with different or additional information. Neither we nor the Placement Agents are making an offer to sell the common shares or the warrants in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. This offering is being made in the United States and elsewhere solely on the basis of the information contained in this offering circular. You should assume that the information appearing in this offering circular is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this offering circular, regardless of the time of delivery of this offering circular or any sale of the common shares or the warrants. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since the date on the front cover of this offering circular. This offering circular is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy the common shares or the warrants in any circumstances under which such offer or solicitation is unlawful.

For investors outside the United States: Neither we nor any of the Placement Agents have done anything that would permit this offering or the possession or distribution of this offering circular in any jurisdiction where action for those purposes is required, other than in the United States. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this offering circular must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating to, this offering of Units and the distribution of this offering circular outside the United States.

Unless the context otherwise requires, in this offering circular, the term(s) "we", "us", "our", "Company", "our company", "Medicus," and "our business" refer to Medicus Pharma Ltd. and our subsidiaries.

MARKET, INDUSTRY AND OTHER DATA

This offering circular contains estimates, projections and other information concerning our industry, our business, and the markets for our products. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties, and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances that are assumed in this information. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market and other data from our own internal estimates and research as well as from reports, research surveys, studies and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data, and similar sources that we believe to be reasonable and reliable.

In addition, assumptions and estimates of our and our industry's future performance are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in "Risk Factors." These and other factors could cause our future performance to differ materially from our assumptions and estimates. See "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."

TRADEMARKS AND TRADE NAMES

We own or have rights to certain trademarks that we use in conjunction with the operations of our business. Each trademark, trade name, service mark or copyright of any other company appearing or incorporated by reference in this offering circular belongs to its holder. Solely for convenience, trademarks, trade names, service marks and copyrights referred to in this prospectus may appear with or without the "©", "®" or "™" symbols, but the inclusion, or not, of such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we, or the applicable owner, will not assert, to the fullest extent possible under applicable law, our or their, as applicable,  rights to these trademarks, trade names service marks or copyrights. We do not intend our use or display of other companies' trademarks, trade names, service marks or copyrights to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, such other companies.

- ii -

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Unless otherwise indicated, the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this offering circular have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS ("IFRS"), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB ("IASB"). None of the consolidated financial statements in this prospectus were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"). Our functional currency is U.S. dollars.

EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION

In this offering circular, all dollar amounts referenced, unless otherwise indicated, are expressed in U.S. dollars and are referred to as "$" or "U.S.$". Canadian dollars are referred to as "C$". The following table sets out, for the periods indicated, the high, low, and period end indicative rates of exchange for US$1.00 expressed in Canadian dollars as published by the Bank of Canada:

On February 26, 2025, the daily average exchange rate for Canadian dollars in terms of the U.S. dollar, as quoted by the Bank of Canada, was $1.00 = C$1.4339.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This offering circular includes forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this offering circular regarding our strategy, future operations, regulatory process, future financial position, future revenue, projected costs, prospects, plans, objectives of management and expected market growth are forward-looking statements. The words "believe", "anticipate", "intend", "expect", "target", "goal", "estimate", "plan", "assume", "may", "will", "predict", "project", "would", "could" and similar expressions or the negative of such terms are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words.

The forward-looking statements in this offering circular include, but are not limited to, statements about:

• our financial results, including our ability to generate earnings and achieve and sustain profitability, which may vary significantly from forecasts and from period to period;

• the progress, timing and completion of our research, development and preclinical studies and clinical trials for our products and product candidates;

• our ability to market, commercialize, achieve market acceptance for and sell our products and product candidates;

• our ability to develop, manage and maintain our direct sales and marketing organizations;

• our estimates regarding anticipated operating losses, future revenues, capital requirements and our needs for additional financing;

- iii -

•  market risks regarding consolidation in the healthcare industry;

• the willingness of healthcare providers to purchase our products if coverage, reimbursement and pricing from third party payors for procedures using our products significantly declines;

• our ability to adequately protect our intellectual property and operate our business without infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others;

• the fact that product quality issues or product defects may harm our business;

• any product liability claims; and

• the regulatory, legal and certain operating risks that our operations subject us to.

We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have included important factors in the cautionary statements included in this offering circular, particularly the factors described in the "Risk Factors" section of this offering circular, that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments that we may make.

You should read this offering circular and the documents that we have filed as exhibits to this offering circular completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, including those listed in the sections of this offering circular entitled "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this offering circular.

Any forward-looking statement made by us in this presentation is based on information currently available to us and speaks only as of the date on which it is made. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

- iv -

OFFERING CIRCULAR SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this offering circular and is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information and consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this offering circular. This summary does not contain all the information you should consider before investing in our securities. You should read this entire offering circular carefully, including "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this offering circular, before making an investment decision.

Overview

Our Company

We are a biotech/life sciences company focused on accelerating the clinical development programs of novel and disruptive therapeutic assets. Currently, we are developing one product, SkinJect^TM (the "Product"), with an indication for basal cell carcinoma.

Through our wholly owned subsidiary, SkinJect, Inc. ("SkinJect"), we focus on the development of our in-licensed drug device combination product using novel dissolvable microneedle arrays for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers. Our combination product candidate is a doxorubicin tip-loaded D-MNA filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") under an Investigational New Drug Application and is regulated by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Registration (CDER), Oncology Division.

Prior to the Company's acquisition of SkinJect, our business was undertaken by SkinJect as a stand-alone entity. References to our business as conducted at a date prior to the completion of the Business Combination (as defined below) relate to the business undertakings of SkinJect.

For information on the Business Combination, see "Corporate History and Information."

We are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including those related to our limited operating history, our lack of historical earnings, and the fact that the Product is a novel technology for which regulatory approval might not be achieved. For more information, see "Risk Factors."

Our Strategy

Our principal purpose is to advance the clinical development program of the Product, a novel, minimally invasive treatment for basal cell carcinoma and potentially other common forms of non-melanoma skin cancer. We also seek to opportunistically identify, evaluate and acquire accretive assets, properties or businesses.

The Product is considered an Investigational New Drug ("IND") by the FDA. In January 2024, we submitted to the FDA a Phase 2 IND clinical protocol to non-invasively treat basal cell carcinoma of the skin using the Product. The clinical protocol was updated in July 2024.

We may also trial the Product on other forms of skin cancer beyond basal cell carcinoma. Specifically, it may be trialed against squamous cell carcinoma, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, as well as pre-cancerous lesions, among other clinical indications, subject to the Company having the capital resources available to do so, without any need to amend or expand the scope of the Company's existing licenses.

In addition, our business strategy includes the opportunistic acquisition of other accretive clinical stage life sciences and biotechnology companies. We have not identified any potential acquisitions at this time, nor have we entered into any agreement, letter of intent or other similar document with respect to any proposed acquisition.

For additional information regarding the business of the Company and the regulatory environment in which it operates, please refer to the offering circular under the heading "Our Business."

Our Strengths

Our key competitive strengths include:

• A senior management team, led by Dr. Raza Bokhari, that has deep experience in medicine and pharmaceutical science as well as a proven track record in business development and entrepreneurship.

• Successful completion of a Phase 1 study of the Product.

• Potential to treat a range of other common non-melanoma skin cancers as well as pre-cancerous lesions.

Summary Risk Factors

Investing in our securities involves risk. Our ability to execute our strategy is also subject to certain risks. The risks described in "Risk Factors" in this offering circular may cause us to not realize the full benefits of our strengths or may cause us to be unable to successfully execute all or part of our strategy. Some of the more significant risks include the following:

• our financial results, including our ability to generate earnings and achieve and sustain profitability (as of September 30, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately US$27.8 million), may vary significantly from forecasts and from period to period;

• the progress, timing and completion of our research, development and preclinical studies and clinical trials for our products and product candidates

• our ability to market, commercialize, achieve market acceptance for and sell our products and product candidates, our ability to develop, manage and maintain our direct sales and marketing organizations;

• our estimates regarding anticipated operating losses, future revenues, capital requirements and our needs for additional financing;

• market risks regarding consolidation in the healthcare industry;

• the willingness of healthcare providers to purchase our products if coverage, reimbursement and pricing from third party payors for procedures using our products significantly declines;

• our ability to adequately protect our intellectual property and operate our business without infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others;

• the fact that product quality issues or product defects may harm our business, any product liability claims; and

• the regulatory, legal and certain operating risks that our operations subject us to.

Please see "Risk Factors" for a discussion of these and other factors you should consider before making an investment in our common shares and warrants.

Corporate Structure

An organizational chart showing our basic corporate structure is set forth below (both subsidiaries are 100% owned by Medicus Pharma Ltd.):

Corporate History and Information

Our company (formerly, Interactive Capital Partners Corporation) was incorporated pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on April 30, 2008 under the name Interactive Capital Partners Corporation. Prior to the Business Combination (as defined below), the Company existed as a shell company and had no business operations.

On September 29, 2023, the Company completed a business combination (the "Business Combination") with SkinJect, a company existing under the laws of Pennsylvania. The Business Combination was completed pursuant to a business combination agreement dated May 12, 2023, as amended, among the Company, SkinJect and RBx Capital, LP ("RBx"), an investment entity owned and managed by Dr. Raza Bokhari, and resulted in a reverse takeover of Interactive Capital Partners Corporation (the Company as it existed prior to the Business Combination) by the former shareholders of SkinJect, with SkinJect becoming a wholly owned operating subsidiary of the Company, and the Company being renamed "Medicus Pharma Ltd." The structure of the Business Combination is commonly used by companies seeking to become reporting issuers in Canada, as it allows the combined entity to be listed on the TSXV at relatively low cost while completing a concurrent equity financing. SkinJect and RBx structured the Business Combination as a reverse takeover for these reasons.

On October 11, 2023, the Company (as it exists after the Business Combination) commenced trading on the TSXV. On November 15, 2024, we completed our initial public offering in the United States and our common shares and Public Warrants began trading on the Nasdaq under the symbols "MDCX" and "MDCXW", respectively.

The Company's registered and head office is located at One First Canadian Place, 100 King Street West, Suite 3400, Toronto, Ontario M5X 1A4, Canada.

We lease U.S. office space in Conshohocken, Pennsylvania to operate the businesses of our U.S. subsidiaries, Medicus Pharma Inc. and SkinJect, Inc.

Our website address is www.medicuspharma.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this offering circular, and you should not consider information contained on our website to be part of this offering circular or in deciding whether to purchase our securities. Our agent for service of process in the United States is Medicus Pharma Inc.

Share Consolidation

In connection with our U.S. initial public offering, we effected a 1-for-2 consolidation, or reverse stock split (the "Share Consolidation"), of our issued and outstanding common shares. Except where otherwise indicated, all share and per share data in this offering circular have been retroactively restated to reflect the Share Consolidation.

Recent Developments

TSXV Delisting

On February 11, 2025, the Company announced that the Company's board of directors had approved the voluntary delisting of its common shares from the TSXV. The delisting was completed on February 21, 2025. The Company’s common shares will continue to be listed and trade on the Nasdaq under the symbol “MDCX”.

Standby Equity Purchase Agreement

On February 10, 2025, the Company also announced that it had entered into a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (the “SEPA”) with YA II PN, Ltd. (“Yorkville”).  Pursuant to the SEPA and subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, Yorkville has committed to purchase the Company’s common shares, no par value, in increments (each purchase, an “Advance”) up to an aggregate gross sales price of up to $15,000,000 during the 36 months following the date of the SEPA. The common shares will be sold at the Company’s option pursuant to the SEPA at 97% of the Market Price (as defined pursuant to the SEPA) and purchases are subject to certain limitations set forth in the SEPA. The Company reserves the right to set a minimum acceptable price in connection with any Advance. The Company expects to use the net proceeds from any Advance, if any, to fund its Phase 2 proof of concept clinical trial for treatment of basal cell carcinoma using its doxorubicin tip loaded dissolvable microarray needle skinpatch. The Company may also use the net proceeds of the SEPA to expand its exploratory phase 2 clinical trial to a pivotal trial and/or to expand its trials to cover other non-melanoma skin diseases. The Company expects to use any remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes and working capital.

Yorkville’s obligation to purchase common shares pursuant to the SEPA is subject to a number of conditions, including that the Company file a registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) with the SEC registering the resale of the Commitment Shares (as defined below) and the common shares. The Company is required to have a Registration Statement declared effective by the SEC before it can sell any common shares to Yorkville pursuant to the SEPA.

The total number of common shares issuable under the terms of the SEPA is limited to a number equivalent to 19.99% of the outstanding common shares as of the date of the SEPA unless certain pricing conditions are met, which could have the effect of limiting the total proceeds made available to the Company under the SEPA. The issuance of common shares under the SEPA is subject to further limitations, including that the common shares beneficially owned by Yorkville and its affiliates at any one time will not exceed 4.99% of the then-outstanding common shares.

As consideration for Yorkville’s commitment to purchase common shares pursuant the SEPA, the Company paid Yorkville a structuring fee in the amount of $25,000 and issued to Yorkville 105,840 common shares (the “Commitment Shares”).

Submission of Phase 2 Clinical Design (SKNJCT-004) to the United Arab Emirates Department of Health

On February 27, 2025, the Company announced that it had submitted a clinical design (SKNJCT-004) to the United Arab Emirates Department of Health to non-invasively treat BCC of the skin. The clinical study, SKNJCT-004, is designed to be a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (P-MNA), multi-center study enrolling up to 36 subjects presenting with BCC of the skin. The study will evaluate the efficacy of two dose levels of D-MNA compared to a placebo control. The participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to one of three groups: a placebo-controlled group receiving P-MNA, a low-dose group receiving 100μg of D-MNA, and a high-dose group receiving 200μg of D-MNA. The study is expected to randomize thirty-six (36) patients in four sites in the UAE.

Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

As a company with less than $1.235 billion in revenues during our last fiscal year, we qualify as an "emerging growth company" as that term is defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the "JOBS Act"). As an emerging growth company we expect to take advantage of specified reduced reporting requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These reduced reporting requirements include, but are not limited to:

• not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended ("Sarbanes-Oxley Act");

• reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements in our periodic reports, proxy statements and registration statements; and

• an exemption from the requirements to obtain a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation or stockholder approval of any golden parachute arrangements.

We may take advantage of these provisions until the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of this offering. However, if certain events occur prior to the end of such five-year period, including if we become a "large accelerated filer," our annual gross revenues exceed $1.235 billion or we issue more than $1 billion of non-convertible debt in any three-year period, we will cease to be an emerging growth company prior to the end of such five-year period.

The JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. As an emerging growth company, we intend to take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards as permitted by the JOBS Act. We have elected to take advantage of certain of the reduced disclosure obligations in this offering circular and may elect to take advantage of other reduced reporting requirements in future filings. As a result, the information in this offering circular and that we provide to our shareholders in the future may be different than what you might receive from other public reporting companies in which you hold equity interests.

Implications of Being a Smaller Reporting Company

Additionally, we are a "smaller reporting company," meaning that the market value of our common shares held by non-affiliates plus the proposed aggregate amount of gross proceeds to us as a result of this transaction is less than $700 million and our annual revenue is less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. As such, we are eligible for exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not smaller reporting companies, including, but not limited to, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company as long as either (i) the market value of our common shares held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million or (ii) our annual revenue is less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our common shares held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million.

THE OFFERING

This summary highlights information presented in greater detail elsewhere in this offering circular. This summary is not complete and does not contain all the information you should consider before investing in our securities. You should carefully read this entire offering circular before investing in our securities, including "Risk Factors" and our consolidated financial statements.

Except as otherwise noted, all information contained in this offering circular assumes:

• no purchase of common shares or warrants in this offering by directors, officers or existing shareholders; and

• no exercise of our outstanding options (as described herein) and Public Warrants, or the warrants offered in this offering.

The number of common shares that will be outstanding after this offering is based on 11,922,561 common shares outstanding as of February 26, 2025.

Continuing Reporting Requirements Under Regulation A

We are required to file periodic and other reports with the SEC, pursuant to the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. Our continuing reporting obligations under Regulation A are deemed to be satisfied as long as we comply with our Section 13(a) reporting requirements.

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following tables set forth our selected historical consolidated financial information. You should read the selected historical consolidated financial information in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this offering circular.

We have derived the selected consolidated statement of operations information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and the selected consolidated balance sheet information as of September 30, 2024 from our unaudited consolidated interim financial statements included elsewhere in this offering circular. We have derived the selected consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 and the selected consolidated balance sheet information as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this offering circular. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, except where indicated otherwise. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that should be expected in any future period.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risks described below and all other information contained in this offering circular before making an investment decision. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose part or all of your investment. This offering circular also contains forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including the risks described below and elsewhere in this offering circular.

We have a limited operating history, which may make it difficult to evaluation our current business and predict our future performance.

We have a limited operating history and, in particular, no history of earnings; we have not paid any dividends and we are unlikely to pay any dividends in the immediate or foreseeable future. Our success will depend to a large extent on the expertise, ability, judgement, discretion, integrity and good faith of our management.

As we are at an early stage of product development, we have not generated revenues to date. We expect to spend a significant amount of capital to fund research and development and clinical trials. As a result, we expect that our operating expenses will increase significantly and, consequently, we will need to generate significant revenues to become profitable. We cannot predict when, if ever, we will be profitable. Even if we do become profitable, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. There can be no assurances that our products will be capable of being produced in commercial quantities at reasonable costs, or be successfully marketed.

We have a novel technology with uncertain market acceptance.

The Product is at an early stage of development, with uncertain market acceptance. Product approval, should this be achieved, does not infer that the Product will garner a good market price or be reimbursed by public or private insurers. Further, there are no guarantees that the Product will be positively received by the target patient population. The acceptability of the Product to regulators, payors and patients will depend on the relative risk versus benefit of the Product as proven in clinical trials, the acceptability of the price, and the relative attractiveness as compared to other treatments.

We could also suffer the consequences of non-compliance or breaches by licensors in connection with any license agreements we may enter into in the future. Such non-compliance or breaches by such third parties could in turn result in breaches or defaults under any agreements with other collaboration partners, and we could be found liable for damages or lose certain rights, including rights to develop and/or commercialize the Product. Loss of our rights to any license granted to us in the future, or the exclusivity rights provided therein, could harm our financial condition and operating results.

The University of Pittsburgh may terminate our license agreement in certain circumstances.

The License Agreement (as defined herein) is our main asset and the basis for the development of the Product. The University of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education (the "University of Pittsburgh") has the right to terminate the License Agreement if breaches are not cured within 30 days of our receipt of notice thereof from the University of Pittsburgh or in certain insolvency-related situations or if we cease to carry out our business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the License Agreement following the offering or that the University of Pittsburgh will grant any necessary waivers if we are unable to do so. The obligations under the License Agreement principally require the trial of the Product on specified timelines. If the University of Pittsburgh were to terminate the License Agreement our assets would essentially be rendered worthless and it would have a material adverse effect on our ability to pursue our business objective.

Our intellectual property is held under third-party licenses.

Our intellectual property is held under a third-party license and we may require additional third-party licenses to effectively develop and manufacture our key products or future technologies. There can be no assurance as to the availability or cost of such additional licenses. A substantial number of patents have already been issued to other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. To the extent that valid third-party patent rights cover our products or services, we or our strategic collaborators would be required to seek licenses from the holders of these patents in order to manufacture, use or sell these products and services, and payments under them would reduce our profits from these products and services. It is not possible to predict the extent to which we may wish or be required to acquire rights under such patents, the availability and cost of acquiring such rights, and whether a license to such patents will be available on acceptable terms or at all. There may be patents in the United States or in foreign countries or patents issued in the future that are unavailable to license on acceptable terms. Our inability to obtain such licenses may hinder or eliminate an ability to manufacture and market products.

If we breach any of the agreements under which we license rights to intellectual property, we could lose license rights that are important to our business. Our current license agreement may not provide an adequate remedy for any breach by the licensor.

For information on the License Agreement, see "Our Business - Patents and Proprietary Information."

Our technology may not be successful for its intended use.

Although the SkinJect Phase 1 study indicated that the patch is well-tolerated, there is no guarantee that the Phase 2 study will produce similar results or that the Product will ultimately be brought to market or, if it does, that it will be positively received or obtain favorable pricing, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Future technology will require regulatory approval, which is costly and we may not be able to obtain it and we may fail to obtain regulatory approvals or only obtain approvals for limited uses or indications.

Market authorization of the Product falls under the regulatory purview of the FDA and other equivalent regulatory bodies worldwide. There can be no assurance that these regulatory bodies will approve the Product in the manner or time frame suggested. Although we intend to work with regulatory consultants and third parties knowledgeable in the area, we cannot ensure that the Product will obtain market authorization in a timely manner, or at all. Market authorization may also be contingent on a less competitive product label, which would negatively impact revenue.

Changes in methods of manufacturing or formulation may result in additional costs or delay.

As the Product is developed through further clinical trials towards approval and commercialization, it is common that various aspects of the development program, such as manufacturing methods and formulation, are altered along the way in an effort to optimize processes and results. Such changes carry the risk that they will not achieve these intended objectives. Any of these changes could cause the Product to perform differently and affect the results of future clinical trials conducted with the altered materials. This could delay completion of clinical trials, require the conduct of bridging clinical trials or the repetition of one or more clinical trials, increase clinical trial costs, delay approval of the Product and jeopardize our ability, or our strategic partners' ability, to commence product sales and generate revenue.

The manufacture of the Product is complex. We or our third-party manufacturers may encounter difficulties in production. If we encounters any such difficulties, our ability to supply the Product for clinical trials or, if approved, for commercial sale could be delayed or halted entirely.

The manufacture of biopharmaceutical products is complex and requires significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls. The process of manufacturing the Product is susceptible to product loss due to contamination, equipment failure or improper installation or operation of equipment, vendor or operator error, contamination and inconsistency in yields, variability in product characteristics and difficulties in scaling the production process. Even minor deviations from normal manufacturing processes could result in reduced production yields, product defects and other supply disruptions. If microbial, viral or other contaminations are discovered in the Product or in the manufacturing facilities in which the Product is made, such manufacturing facilities may need to be closed for an extended period of time to investigate and remedy the contamination. Any adverse developments affecting manufacturing operations for the Product, if any are approved, may result in shipment delays, inventory shortages, lot failures, product withdrawals or recalls, or other interruptions in the supply of our products. We may also have to take inventory write-offs and incur other charges and expenses for products that fail to meet specifications, undertake costly remediation efforts or seek more costly manufacturing alternatives.

We rely on external contract research organizations to provide clinical and nonclinical research services and agreements with these organizations of which one agreement is currently in place.

The outsourcing of functions to contract research organizations involves the risk that third party providers may not perform to our standards, may not produce results in a timely manner or may fail to perform at all. If any contract research organization fails to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, the research and data generated may be deemed unreliable to regulatory authorities. Additional pre-clinical and clinical trials may be required before approval of marketing applications will be given. We cannot provide assurance that all third-party providers will meet the regulatory requirements for research and pre-clinical trials. Failure of third-party providers to meet regulatory requirements could result in repeat pre-clinical and clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process or result in termination of pre-clinical and clinical trials. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell the Product, if approved, we may be unable to generate any product revenue.

To successfully commercialize the Product, we will need to build out sales and marketing capabilities, either on our own or with others. The establishment and development of our own commercial team or the establishment of a contract field force to market the Product will be expensive and time-consuming and could delay launch. Moreover, we cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully develop this capability. We may seek to enter into collaborations with other entities to use their established marketing and distribution capabilities, but we may be unable to enter into such agreements on favorable terms, if at all. If any current or future collaborators do not commit sufficient resources to commercialize the Product, or we are unable to develop the necessary capabilities on our own, we may be unable to generate sufficient revenue to sustain our business. We may compete with many companies that currently have extensive, experienced and well-funded marketing and sales operations to recruit, hire, train and retain marketing and sales personnel. Without an internal team or the support of a third party to perform marketing and sales functions, we may be unable to compete successfully against these more established companies.

We rely on key personnel.

Our success depends in large measure on certain key personnel, including our chief executive officer, Dr. Raza Bokhari. The loss of the services of such key personnel could have a material adverse effect on us. The contributions of these individuals to our operations immediately after this offering are likely to be of central importance. In addition, the competition for qualified personnel in the biotech industry is intense and there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to attract and retain all personnel necessary for the development and operation of our business. Investors must rely upon the ability, expertise, judgment, discretion, integrity and good faith of ours management. Other biotechnology companies with which we compete for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources, different risk profiles and a longer history in the industry than we do. They also may provide more diverse opportunities and better chances for career advancement. Some of these characteristics may be more appealing to high-quality candidates than those that we have to offer. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high-quality personnel, the rate of and success with which we can develop and commercialize the Product would be limited.

As a technology-driven company, intellectual input from key management and personnel is critical to achieve our business objectives. Consequently, our ability to retain these individuals and attract other qualified individuals is critical to our success. The loss of the services of key individuals might significantly delay or prevent achievement of our business objectives. In addition, because of a relative scarcity of individuals with the high degree of education and scientific achievement required for our business, competition among biotech companies for qualified employees is intense and, as a result, we may not be able to attract and retain such individuals on acceptable terms, or at all.

SkinJect also has relationships with scientific collaborators at academic and other institutions, some of whom conduct research at SkinJect's request or assist SkinJect in formulating the SkinJect's research and development strategies. These scientific collaborators are not SkinJect employees and may have commitments to, or consulting or advisory contracts with, other entities that may limit their availability to us. In addition, even though SkinJect's collaborators are required to sign confidentiality agreements prior to working, they may have arrangements with other companies to assist such other companies in developing technologies that may prove competitive to us.

Incentive provisions for our key executives include base salary and the granting of stock options that vest over time, designed to encourage such individuals to stay with us. However, a low share price could render such agreements of little value to our key executives. In such event, our key executives could be susceptible to being hired away by our competitors who could offer a better compensation package. If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel our business, financial conditions and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We may not be able to successfully execute our business strategy.

The execution of our business strategy poses many challenges and is based on a number of assumptions. If we experience significant regulatory delays, supply chain disruptions, cost overruns on our programs, or if our business plan is more costly than we anticipate, certain research and development activities may be delayed or eliminated, resulting in changes or delays to our commercialization plans, or we may be compelled to secure additional funding (which may or may not be available) to execute our business strategy. We cannot predict with certainty future revenues or results from operations. If the assumptions on which our revenue or expenditure forecasts are based change, the benefits of our business strategy may change as well.

We will require additional financing in the future, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.

The development of our business is expected to require additional financing. Failure to obtain sufficient financing may result in the delay or indefinite postponement of our business plans. The initial primary source of funding available to us consists of equity financing. There can be no assurance that additional capital or other types of financing will be available if needed or that, if available, the terms of such financing will be favorable to us.

The ongoing volatility in global capital markets has generally made the raising of capital by equity or debt financing more difficult. Access to financing has been negatively impacted by ongoing global economic risks and increased inflation. We will require substantial additional funds for further research and development, and the marketing and sale of our technology. We may attempt to raise additional funds for these purposes through public or private equity or debt financing, collaborations with other therapeutic companies, government grants or other sources. There can be no assurance that additional funding or partnerships will be available on terms acceptable to us and which would foster the successful commercialization of the Product. If additional funds are raised through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, existing shareholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities issued could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of the common shares or terms superior to those of the warrants. Any debt financing secured in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital or to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. If adequate funds are not obtained, we may be required to reduce, curtail or discontinue operations.

We have had negative operating cash flows since inception and expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future.

We have had negative cash flow from operating activities and has incurred operating losses since its inception. We anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future, and we expect these losses to increase as we continue our research and development of, and seek regulatory approvals for, our product candidates, prepare for and begin to commercialize any approved product candidates and add infrastructure and personnel to support our product development efforts and operations as a public company. The net losses and negative cash flows incurred to date, together with expected future losses, have had, and likely will continue to have, an adverse effect on our shareholders' deficit and working capital. As of September 30, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately US$27.8 million. The amount of future net losses will depend, in part, on the rate of future growth of our expenses and our ability to generate revenue.

To the extent that we have negative operating cash flow in future periods, we may need to allocate a portion of our cash reserves to fund such negative cash flow. We may also be required to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or debt securities. There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate positive cash flow from our operations or that additional capital or other types of financing will be available when needed or on terms favorable to us.

We are in a highly competitive industry which is continuously evolving with technological changes.

We are engaged in an industry that is highly competitive, evolving and characterized by technological change. As a result, it is difficult for us to predict whether, when and by whom new competing technologies or new competitors may enter the market. We face competition from companies with strong positions in certain markets we are currently targeting, and in new markets and regions we may enter. Some of these companies have significantly greater financial, technical, human, research and development, and marketing resources than us. We cannot assure that we will be able to compete effectively against current and future competitors who may discover and develop products in advance of us that are more effective than those developed by us. As a consequence, our current and future technologies may become obsolete or uncompetitive, resulting in adverse effects on revenue, margins and profitability. In addition, competition or other competitive pressures may result in price reductions, reduced margins or loss of market share, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. To the extent that new or improved pharmaceutical drug treatments are introduced that demonstrate better long-term efficacy and safety, patients and physicians may further delay the introduction of patches, such as the Product, if approved, in the skin cancer treatment continuum. the Product could also face competition from other formulations or devices that deliver chemotherapeutic agents on an extended basis.

Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and other resources, such as larger research and development staffs and experienced commercial and manufacturing organizations. Mergers and acquisitions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries may result in even more resources being concentrated in competitors. As a result, these companies may obtain regulatory approval more rapidly than us are able and may be more effective in selling and marketing their products as well. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large, established companies. Competition may increase further as a result of advances in the commercial applicability of technologies and greater availability of capital for investment in these industries. Our competitors may succeed in developing, acquiring or licensing on an exclusive basis drug products or drug delivery technologies that are more effective or less costly than the Product.

We believe that our ability to compete effectively depends upon many factors both within and beyond our control, including:

•              the usefulness, ease of use, performance and reliability of our technology compared to our competitors;

•              the activity and tolerability of the Product, including relative to marketed products and product candidates in development by third parties;

•              the ability to distinguish safety and efficacy from existing, alternative therapies;

•              the timing for the Product to complete clinical development and receive market approval;

•              acceptance of the Product by patients, physicians and other health providers,

•              our ability to monetize our technology;

•              the selection of licensing partners for our technology with the necessary skills and resources to drive uptake;

•              our marketing and selling efforts;

•              our financial condition and results of operations;

•              the ability to maintain a good relationship with regulatory authorities;

•              the price of our future products, including in comparison to branded or generic competitors;

•              whether coverage and adequate levels of reimbursement are available under private and governmental health insurance plans,

•              acquisitions or consolidations within our industry, which may result in more formidable competitors;

•              our ability to protect our intellectual property rights,

•              our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees;

•              our ability to cost-effectively manage and grow our operations; and

•              our reputation and brand strength relative to that of our competitors.

Our future success will depend on our ability to continually enhance and develop the Product.

There is a broad pipeline of potential new therapies for skin cancer. The market is characterized by rapid technological change and the possibility of frequent new product introductions. Accordingly, our future success depends upon our ability to enhance the Product and to develop, introduce and sell the most accurate products at competitive prices. The development of new technologies and products involves time, substantial costs and risks. Our ability to successfully develop new technologies depends in large measure on our ability to maintain a technically skilled research and development staff and to adapt to technological changes and advances in the industry.

The success of new product introductions depends on a number of factors including the efficacy and safety as demonstrated in clinical trials, the ability to demonstrate the impact of real world evidence, timely and successful product development, the timing and market introduction of competitive products, market acceptance, the effective management of purchase commitments and inventory levels in line with anticipated product demand, the availability of pharmaceutical components in appropriate quantities and costs to meet anticipated demand, the risk that new products may have quality or other defects in the early stages of introduction and our ability to manage distribution and production issues related to new product introductions, the clinical indications for which the product is approved, acceptance by physicians, the medical community and patients of the product as a safe and effective treatment, the ability to distinguish safety and efficacy from existing, less expensive alternative therapies, the convenience of prescribing, administrating and initiating patients on the product, the potential and perceived advantages and/or value of the product over alternative treatments, the cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments, including any similar generic treatments, the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement by third-party payors and government authorities to support the product's pricing, the prevalence and severity of adverse side effects and the effectiveness of sales and marketing efforts.

If we are unable, for any reason, to enhance, develop, introduce and sell new products in a timely manner, or at all, in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements or otherwise, our business would be harmed.

If we are unable to differentiate the Product from existing therapies for treatment of skin cancer, or if the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities approve generic products that compete with the Product, the ability to successfully commercialize the Product would be adversely affected.

Although the Phase 1 study provides preliminary evidence of complete clinical response, it is possible that we will receive data from additional clinical trials or in a post marketing setting from physician and patient experiences with the commercial product that does not continue to support such interpretations. It is also possible that the FDA, physicians and healthcare payers will not agree with our interpretation of existing and future clinical trial data. If we are unable to demonstrate the value of the Product based on clinical data, patient experience, as well as real world evidence, the opportunity for the Product to maintain premium pricing and be commercialized successfully would be adversely affected.

Additionally, the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities may approve other generic products that could compete with the Product if we cannot adequately protect it with our patent portfolio. For example, in the US, once an NDA is approved, the product covered thereby becomes a "listed drug" which can, in turn, be cited by potential competitors in support of approval of an abbreviated new drug application ("ANDA"). The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the "FDCA"), FDA regulations and other applicable regulations and policies provide incentives to manufacturers to create modified, non-infringing versions of a drug to facilitate the approval of an ANDA or other application for generic substitutes. These manufacturers might only be required to conduct a relatively inexpensive study to show that their product has the same active ingredient(s), dosage form, strength, route of administration, conditions of use, or labeling as our product candidate and that the generic product is bioequivalent to us, meaning it is absorbed in the body at the same rate and to the same extent as the Product. These generic equivalents, which must meet the same quality standards as branded pharmaceuticals, would be significantly less costly than ours to bring to market and companies that produce generic equivalents are generally able to offer their products at lower prices. Thus, after the introduction of a generic competitor, a significant percentage of the sales of any branded product is typically lost to the generic product. Accordingly, competition from generic equivalents to our products would materially adversely impact our ability to successfully commercialize the Product.

A variety of risks associated with potential international business relationships could materially adversely affect our business.

We may enter into agreements with third parties for the development and commercialization of the Product in international markets. If we do so, we would be subject to additional risks related to entering into international business relationships, including:

● differing regulatory requirements in other countries including, among others, marketing approval, pricing, reimbursement and sales and marketing practices;

● potentially reduced protection for intellectual property rights;

● potential for so-called parallel importing, which is when a local seller, faced with higher local prices, opts to import goods from a foreign market with lower prices, rather than buying them locally;

● unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory requirements, including the imposition of new tariffs by the U.S. government on imports to the U.S. and/or the imposition of retaliatory tariffs by foreign countries;

● economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in foreign economies and markets;

● compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees traveling and working abroad;

● foreign taxes;

● foreign currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating expenses and reduced revenues, and other risks incident to doing business in another country;

● workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in Canada or the United States;

● production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad or supply chain disruptions; and

● business interruptions resulting from geo-political actions, including war and terrorism, or natural disasters, including earthquakes, volcanoes, typhoons, floods, tsunamis, hurricanes and fires.

These and other risks may materially adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize products in international markets and may harm our business.

Collaboration arrangements we may enter into in the future may not be successful.

We may seek future partnerships, collaborations and other strategic transactions to maximize the commercial potential of the Product. We may enter into such arrangements on a selective basis depending on the merits of retaining commercialization rights for ourself as compared to entering into selective collaboration arrangements with leading pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies, both in the United States and internationally. We face competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Moreover, collaboration arrangements are complex and time consuming to negotiate, document and implement. We may not be successful in our efforts to establish and implement collaborations or other alternative arrangements should we choose to enter into such arrangements. The terms of any collaborations or other arrangements that we may establish may not be favorable to us.

Any future collaborations that we enter into may not be successful. The success of our collaboration arrangements will depend heavily on the efforts and activities of our collaborators.

Collaborators generally have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations.

Disagreements between parties to a collaboration arrangement regarding clinical development and commercialization matters could lead to delays in the development process or commercialization of our product candidate and, in some cases, termination of the collaboration arrangement. These disagreements can be difficult to resolve if neither of the parties has final decision-making authority.

Collaborations with pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies and other third parties often are terminated or allowed to expire by the other party. Any such termination or expiration could adversely affect us financially and could harm our business reputation.

We may acquire businesses or products, or form strategic alliances in the future, and we may not realize the benefits of such acquisitions or alliances.

We may acquire additional businesses or products, form strategic alliances or create joint ventures with third parties that we believe will complement or augment our existing business. If we acquire businesses with promising markets or technologies, we may not be able to realize the benefit of acquiring such businesses if we are unable to successfully integrate them with our existing operations and company culture. We may encounter numerous difficulties in developing, manufacturing and marketing any new products resulting from a strategic alliance or acquisition that delay or prevent us from realizing their expected benefits or enhancing our business. We cannot assure you that, following any such acquisition, we will achieve the expected synergies to justify the transaction. In addition, we may require significant additional funds to either acquire such businesses or products or to commercialize them, which may result in significant dilution to shareholders or the incurrence of significant indebtedness by us.

We do not have any customer commitments.

We may negotiate clinical and/or commercial supply agreements for the Product or product sub-components. At the time of this offering circular, there are no commitments from customers for the Product. Because we do not have any contracts for the Product, management may not accurately predict future revenue streams and there may be no assurance that customers would continue to use our products, or that we would be able to replace departing potential customers with new potential customers that provide us with comparable revenue.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of computer system failures, cyberattacks, or a deficiency in our cyber security.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems, and those of the third parties on which we rely, are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures. If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our commercialization or further development of our technology. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of or damage to our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and the further development or the commercialization of our products could be delayed or disrupted.

We may fail to manage growth successfully which may adversely impact operating results.

Our failure to manage our growth successfully may adversely impact our operating results. Our ability to manage growth will require us to continue to build our operational, financial and management controls, contracting relationships, marketing and business development plans and controls and reporting systems and procedures. Our ability to manage our growth will also depend in large part upon a number of factors, including the ability for us to rapidly:

• expand our internal and operational and financial controls significantly so that we can maintain control over operations;

• attract and retain qualified technical personnel in order to continue to develop reliable and flexible products and provide services that respond to evolving customer needs;

• build a sales team to keep customers and channel partners informed regarding the technical features issues and key selling points of our products and services;

• develop support capacity for customers as sales increase; and

• build a channel network to create an expanding presence in the evolving marketplace for our products and services.

An inability to achieve any of these objectives could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any products we develop will be subject to extensive, lengthy and uncertain regulatory requirements, which could adversely affect the ability to obtain regulatory approval in a timely manner, or at all.

It is understood that pharmacologic therapies are subject to an extensive, lengthy and unpredictable regulatory approval process by the FDA and equivalent regulatory bodies in other countries. This entails significant investment in time and resources, with no guarantee on the outcome or timeframe. We may encounter significant delays or excessive costs in our efforts to secure necessary market authorizations. Even if approved, the different regulatory bodies have numerous regulations governing the manufacturing, labeling, distributing, marketing, promotion and advertising after product approval. The regulatory requirements governing new technologies might be subject to change, and the products themselves may be subject to substantial review by the FDA and/or other governmental regulatory authorities that could prevent or delay approval of these products. Regulatory constraints ultimately imposed on our products, if approved, could limit our ability to commercialize, thus impacting on our financial condition and results.

Manufacture and marketing of the Product is subject to government regulation. In most countries, we will be required to complete extensive non-clinical studies and clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Product in order to apply for regulatory approval to market the product. Prior to marketing approval in the United States, required steps include non-clinical (animal and laboratory) testing; performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the Product in the intended target population; performance of a consistent and reproducible manufacturing process intended for commercial use; and successful filing and approval of an NDA. These processes are costly and the timeframe and success are uncertain and may be out of our control. We also have no control over the extent of approval, which can be restricted to specific jurisdictions and/or conditions on the product label and limit our revenues.

Once approved, we will be subjected to continuing regulatory review, including adverse event reporting requirements and the FDA's general prohibition against promoting products for unapproved uses. We may also have other forms of post approval commitments, such as clinical trials or enhanced safety reporting and commitments. Failure to comply with any post-approval requirements can have consequences including warning letters, product seizures, recalls, substantial fines, injunctions, withdrawal of approvals, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions. Any of these enforcement actions, any unanticipated changes in existing regulatory requirements or the adoption of new requirements, or any safety issues that arise with any approved products, could negatively impact on our ability to market products and generate revenues and thus our ability to continue our operations.

We also may be restricted or prohibited from marketing or manufacturing a product, even after obtaining product approval, if previously unknown problems with the product or our manufacturer are subsequently discovered. Moreover, we cannot provide assurance that newly discovered or developed safety issues will not arise following any regulatory approval. If our product is used by a large patient population, serious adverse events may occur from time to time that initially may seem unconnected to the treatment, and only when it repeatedly occurs over a period of time does the treatment become suspect as having a causal relationship to the adverse event. Any safety issues could cause us to suspend or cease marketing of our approved products, possibly subject us to substantial liabilities, and adversely affect our ability to generate revenues.

We may not be able to obtain marketing approval.

Even if we complete the necessary non-clinical studies and clinical trials, the marketing approval process is expensive, time-consuming, and uncertain and may prevent us from obtaining approvals for the commercialization of the Product. If we are not able to obtain, or if there are delays in obtaining, required regulatory approvals, we will not be able to commercialize, or will be delayed in commercializing, the Product, and our ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired.

We rely on the protection of intellectual property rights.

Our commercial success depends to a significant degree upon our ability to develop new or improved technologies, instruments and products, and to obtain patents or other intellectual property rights or statutory protection for these technologies and products in Canada, the United States and other countries, such as the countries in the European Union and Asia. We intend to patent concepts, components, processes, industrial designs and methods, and other inventions and technologies that we considers to have commercial value or that will likely give us a competitive advantage. Despite devoting resources to the research and development of proprietary technology, we may not be able to develop new technology that is patentable or protectable. Further, patents issued to us, if any, could be challenged, held invalid or unenforceable, or be circumvented and may not provide us with necessary or sufficient protection or a competitive advantage.

In addition, despite our efforts to protect and maintain our patents competitors and other third parties may be able to design around our patents, if so awarded, or develop products similar to our products that are not within the scope of such patents. Finally, patents provide certain statutory protection only for a limited period of time that varies depending on the jurisdiction and type of patent. The statutory protection term of our patents expire between 2030 and 2035 and, thereafter, the underlying technology of such patents will be allowed to be used by any third party, including our competitors. Moreover, the inventions covered by patents may be free to be used in countries for which there is no patent protection. A number of our competitors and other third parties have been issued patents, or may have filed patent applications, or may obtain additional patents or other intellectual property rights for technologies similar to those that we have developed, used or commercialized, or may develop, use or commercialize, in the future. As certain patent applications in the United States and other countries are maintained in secrecy for a period of time after filing, and as publication or public awareness of new technologies often lags behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we have been the first to develop the technology covered by our pending patent applications. In addition, the disclosure in our patent applications, including in respect of the utility of our claimed inventions, may not be sufficient to meet the statutory requirements for patentability in all cases. As a result, we can provide no assurance that our patent applications will result in valid or enforceable patents.

Prosecution and protection of the rights sought in patent applications and patents can be costly and uncertain, often involve complex legal and factual issues and consume significant time and resources. In addition, the breadth of claims allowed in our future patents, their enforceability and our ability to protect and maintain them cannot be predicted with any certainty. The laws of certain countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of Canada or the United States Even if our patents are held to be valid and enforceable in a certain jurisdiction, any legal proceedings that we may initiate against third parties to enforce such patents will likely be expensive, take significant time and divert management's attention from other business matters. We can provide no assurance that any of our pending patent applications will provide any protectable, maintainable or enforceable rights or competitive advantages to it.

Intellectual property rights do not necessarily address all potential threats to our competitive advantage.

Once granted, patents may remain open to invalidity challenges including opposition, interference, re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, nullification or derivation action in court or before patent offices or similar proceedings for a given period after allowance or grant, during which time third parties can raise objections against such grant. In the course of such proceedings, which may continue for a protracted period of time, the patent owner may be compelled to limit the scope of the allowed or granted claims thus attacked or may lose the allowed or granted claims altogether.

In addition, the degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights is uncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations, and may not adequately protect our business, provide a barrier to entry against our competitors or potential competitors, or permit us to maintain our competitive advantage. Moreover, if a third party has intellectual property rights that cover the practice of our technology, we may not be able to fully exercise or extract value from our intellectual property rights. The following examples are illustrative:

● others may be able to make product that is similar to product candidates we intend to commercialize that is not covered by the patents that we own;

● we, or any collaborators might not have been the first to make or reduce to practice the inventions covered by the issued patents or pending patent applications that we own;

● we or any collaborators might not have been the first to file patent applications covering certain of our inventions;

● others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies without infringing our intellectual property rights;

● it is possible that our pending patent applications will not lead to issued patents;

● issued patents that we own may not provide us with any competitive advantages, or may be held invalid or unenforceable as a result of legal challenges;

● our competitors might conduct research and development activities in the United States and other countries that provide a safe harbor from patent infringement claims for certain research and development activities, as well as in countries where we do not have patent rights, and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our major commercial markets; and we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable;

● third parties performing manufacturing or testing for us using our products or technologies could use the intellectual property of others without obtaining a proper license;

● parties may assert an ownership interest in our intellectual property and, if successful, such disputes may preclude us from exercising exclusive rights over that intellectual property;

● we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable;

● we may not be able to obtain and maintain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, or at all; and

● the patents of others may harm our business.

Should any of these events occur, they could significantly harm our business and results of operations. We can provide no assurance that we will be successful in protecting, maintaining or enforcing our intellectual property rights. If we are not successful in protecting, maintaining or enforcing our intellectual property rights, then our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

We may not be able to enforce our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

The laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of Canada and the United States. Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of some countries, particularly developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, especially those relating to life sciences.

To the extent that we have obtained or are able to obtain patents or other intellectual property rights in any foreign jurisdictions, it may be difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or the misappropriation of other intellectual property rights. For example, some foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries limit the availability of certain types of patent rights and enforceability of patents against third parties, including government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, patents may provide limited or no benefit.

Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business. Accordingly, our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate.

Many countries, including European Union countries, India, Japan and China, have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled under specified circumstances to grant licenses to third parties. In those countries, we may have limited remedies if patents are infringed or if we are compelled to grant a license to a third party, which could materially diminish the value of those patents. This could limit our potential revenue opportunities. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop.

Guidelines and recommendations published by various organizations can reduce the use of products that we may commercialize.

Government agencies promulgate regulations and guidelines directly applicable to us and our products. In addition, professional societies, practice management groups, private health and science foundations and organizations involved in various diseases from time to time may also publish guidelines or recommendations to the healthcare and patient communities with respect to specific products. Recommendations of government agencies or these other groups or organizations may relate to such matters as usage, dosage, route of administration and use of concomitant therapies. Recommendations or guidelines that do not recognize our future products, suggest limitations or inadequacies of our future products, or suggest the use of competitive or alternative products as the standard of care to be followed by patients and healthcare providers, could result in decreased use or adoption of our future products.

Patent reform legislation in the United States.

On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the "Leahy-Smith Act") was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation. In particular, under the Leahy-Smith Act, the United States transitioned in March 2013 to a "first to file" system in which the first inventor to file a patent application will be entitled to the patent.

Further, the Leahy-Smith Act also includes significant changes in the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation. These include allowing third parties to submit prior art during patent prosecution by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"), and additional procedures to attack the validity of a patent in post-grant proceedings including opposition, derivation, re-examination, inter partes review or interference proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. An adverse determination in any such submission, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope or enforceability of, or invalidate, our patent rights, which could adversely affect our competitive position.

Patent reform legislation in the United States, including the Leahy-Smith Act, could increase those uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents. The Leahy-Smith Act was signed into law on September 16, 2011, and includes a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted, redefine prior art and provide more efficient and cost-effective avenues for competitors to challenge the validity of patents. These include allowing third -party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution and additional procedures to attack the validity of a patent by USPTO administered post-grant proceedings, including post-grant review, inter partes review, and derivation proceedings. After March 15, 2013, under the Leahy-Smith Act, the United States transitioned to a first inventor to file system in which, assuming that the other statutory requirements are met, the first inventor to file a patent application will be entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether a third party was the first to invent the claimed invention. The Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications, our ability to obtain future patents, and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Moreover, we may be subject to a third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the USPTO or become involved in opposition, derivation, reexamination, inter partes review, post-grant review or interference proceedings challenging our owned patent rights. An adverse determination in any such submission, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope of, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties to commercialize our technology or products and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize products without infringing third-party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates.

The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, and our patents may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States and abroad. Such challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products. Moreover, patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years after it is filed. The statutory protection term of our patents expire between 2030 and 2035 and, thereafter, the underlying technology of such patents will be allowed to be used by any third party, including our competitors. Various extensions may be available; however, the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Without patent protection for our current or future product candidates, we may be open to competition from generic versions of such products. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.

If we do not obtain protection under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments by obtaining data exclusivity, our business may be harmed.

Our commercial success will largely depend on our ability to obtain market exclusivity in the United States and other countries with respect to our drug candidates and their target indications. Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of FDA marketing approval of our drug candidates, certain of our product candidates may be eligible for marketing exclusivity. The FDCA provides three years of marketing exclusivity for an NDA, or supplement to an existing NDA if new clinical investigations, other than bioavailability studies, that were conducted or sponsored by the applicant are deemed by the FDA to be essential to the approval of the application, for example new indications, dosages, dosage forms or strengths of an existing drug. This three-year exclusivity covers only the conditions associated with the new clinical investigations and prohibits the FDA from approving an ANDA, or a 505(b)(2) NDA submitted by another company with overlapping conditions associated with the new clinical investigations for the three-year period. Clinical investigation exclusivity does not prohibit the FDA from approving ANDAs for drugs containing the original active agent. The three-year exclusivity will not delay the submission or approval of an NDA for the same drug. However, an applicant submitting an NDA would be required to conduct or obtain a right of reference to all of the preclinical studies and adequate and well-controlled clinical trials necessary to demonstrate safety and effectiveness.

If we are unable to obtain such marketing exclusivity for our product candidates, our competitors may be able to take advantage of our investment in development and clinical trials by referencing our clinical and preclinical data to obtain approval of competing products and launch their product earlier than might otherwise be the case.

Risk of reduced or eliminated patent protection from non-compliance with regulatory requirements.

Periodic maintenance fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the USPTO and foreign patent agencies in several stages over the lifetime of the patent. The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. While an inadvertent lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which non-compliance can result in unenforceability, invalidity, abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Non-compliance events that could result in unenforceability, invalidity, abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include, but are not limited to, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we or any future licensors fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering the Product, our competitive position would be adversely affected.

We may infringe the intellectual property rights of others.

Our commercial success depends, in part, upon it not infringing or violating intellectual property rights owned by others. The industry in which we compete has participants that own, or claim to own, intellectual property. We cannot determine with certainty whether any existing third-party patents, or the issuance of any new third-party patents, would require us to alter our technologies or products, obtain licenses or cease certain activities, including the sale of certain products.

We may in the future receive claims from third parties asserting infringement and other related claims. Litigation may be necessary to determine the scope, enforceability and validity of third-party intellectual property rights or to protect, maintain and enforce our intellectual property rights. Some of our competitors have, or are affiliated with companies having, substantially greater resources than we have, and these competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex intellectual property litigation to a greater degree and for longer periods of time than we can. Regardless of whether claims that it is infringing or violating patents or other intellectual property rights have any merit, those claims could:

● adversely affect our relationships with current or future distributors and dealers of our products;

● adversely affect our reputation with customers;

● be time-consuming and expensive to evaluate and defend;

● cause product shipment delays or stoppages; divert management's attention and resources;

● subject us to significant liabilities and damages;

● require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements; or

● require us to cease certain activities, including the sale of products.

If it is determined that we have infringed, violated or is infringing or violating a patent or the intellectual property right of any other person or if we are found liable in respect of any other related claim, then, in addition to being liable for potentially substantial damages, we may be prohibited from developing, using, distributing, selling or commercializing certain of our technologies and products unless we obtain a license from the holder of the patent or other intellectual property right. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to obtain any such license on a timely basis or on commercially favorable terms, or that any such licenses will be available, or that workarounds will be feasible and cost-efficient. If we do not obtain such a license or find a cost-efficient workaround, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected and we could be required to cease related business operations in some markets and restructure our business to focus on our continuing operations in other markets.

Our general liability insurance expires on October 11, 2025. There can be no assurance that we will be able to renew our liability insurance on favorable terms or at all.

We may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of a third-party patent, which might harm our ability to develop and market our products.

We cannot guarantee that any of our patent searches or analyses, including the identification of relevant patents, the scope of patent claims or the expiration of relevant patents, are complete or thorough, nor can we be certain that we have identified each and every third-party patent and pending application in the United States and abroad that is or may be relevant to or necessary for the commercialization of our product candidates in any jurisdiction. Patent applications in the United States and elsewhere are not published until approximately 18 months after the earliest filing for which priority is claimed, with such earliest filing date being commonly referred to as the priority date. In addition, U.S. patent applications filed before November 29, 2000 and certain U.S. patent applications filed after that date that will not be filed outside the United States remain confidential until patents issue. Therefore, patent applications covering our products could have been filed by others without our knowledge. Additionally, pending patent applications that have been published can, subject to certain limitations, be later amended in a manner that could cover our product candidates or the use of our products.

The scope of a patent claim is determined by an interpretation of the law, the written disclosure in a patent and the patent's prosecution history. Our interpretation of the relevance or the scope of a patent or a pending application may be incorrect, which may negatively impact our ability to market our products. We may incorrectly determine that our products are not covered by a third-party patent or may incorrectly predict whether a third party's pending application will issue with claims of relevant scope. Our determination of the expiration date of any patent in the United States or abroad that we consider relevant may be incorrect, and our failure to identify and correctly interpret relevant patents may negatively impact our ability to develop and market our products.

If we fail to identify and correctly interpret relevant patents, we may be subject to infringement claims. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully settle or otherwise resolve such infringement claims. If we fail in any such dispute, in addition to being forced to pay damages, we may be temporarily or permanently prohibited from commercializing any of our products that are held to be infringing. We might, if possible, also be forced to redesign products or services so that we no longer infringe the third-party intellectual property rights. Any of these events, even if we were ultimately to prevail, could require us to divert substantial financial and management resources that we would otherwise be able to devote to our business.

We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or our other intellectual property rights, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe or otherwise violate our patents or our other intellectual property rights. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file legal claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours is not valid or is unenforceable or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. As a result, we cannot predict with certainty how much protection, if any, will be given to our patents if we attempt to enforce them and they are challenged in court. Further, even if we prevail against an infringer in U.S. district court, there is always the risk that the infringer will file an appeal and the district court judgment will be overturned at the appeals court and/or that an adverse decision will be issued by the appeals court relating to the validity or enforceability of our patents. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing. The initiation of a claim against a third party may also cause the third party to bring counter claims against us such as claims asserting that our patents are invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, non-enablement or lack of written description or statutory subject matter. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant material information from the USPTO, or made a materially misleading statement, during prosecution. Third parties may also raise similar validity claims before the USPTO in post-grant proceedings such as ex parte reexaminations, inter partes review, or post-grant review, or oppositions or similar proceedings outside the United States, in parallel with litigation or even outside the context of litigation. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. We cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of any future patent protection on our current or future product candidates.

We may not be able to detect or prevent misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States. Our business could be harmed if in litigation the prevailing party does not offer us a license on commercially reasonable terms. Any litigation or other proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights may fail, and even if successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management and other employees.

Even if we establish infringement, the court may decide not to grant an injunction against further infringing activity and instead award only monetary damages, which may or may not be an adequate remedy. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could harm the price of our securities.

Intellectual property litigation could cause us to spend substantial resources and distract our personnel from their normal responsibilities and have a harmful effect on the success of our business.

Even if resolved in our favor, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may cause us to incur significant expenses and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments, and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could adversely impact the price of our securities. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any future sales, marketing or distribution activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to conduct such litigation or proceedings adequately. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our intellectual property. In addition, the uncertainties associated with litigation could compromise our ability to raise the funds necessary to continue our clinical trials and internal research programs. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could compromise our ability to compete in the marketplace, including compromising our ability to raise the funds necessary to continue our clinical trials, continue our research programs, license necessary technology from third parties, or enter into development collaborations that would help us commercialize our product candidates, if approved.

Because of the expense and uncertainty of litigation, we may not be in a position to enforce our intellectual property rights against third parties.

Because of the expense and uncertainty of litigation, we may conclude that even if a third party is infringing our issued patent, any patents that may be issued as a result of our pending or future patent applications or other intellectual property rights, the risk-adjusted cost of bringing and enforcing such a claim or action may be too high or not in the best interest of our company or our shareholders. In such cases, we may decide that the more prudent course of action is to simply monitor the situation or initiate or seek some other non-litigious action or solution.

We may need to license intellectual property from third parties, and such licenses may not be available or may not be available on commercially reasonable terms.

The issuance of a patent does not give us the right to practice the patented invention. A third party may hold intellectual property, including patent rights, that are important or necessary to the development of our product candidates. Third parties may also have blocking patents that could prevent us from marketing our products or practicing our own patented technology. It may be necessary for us to use the patented or proprietary technology of third parties to commercialize our drug candidates, in which case we would be required to obtain a license from these third parties on commercially reasonable terms. Such a license may not be available, or it may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, in which case our business would be harmed.

The risks described elsewhere pertaining to our intellectual property rights also apply to any intellectual property rights that we may in-license, and any failure by us or our potential licensors to obtain, maintain, defend and enforce these rights could harm our business. In some cases we may not have control over the prosecution, maintenance or enforcement of the patents that we may license, and may not have sufficient ability to provide input into the patent prosecution, maintenance and defense process with respect to such patents, and our potential licensors may fail to take the steps that we believe are necessary or desirable in order to obtain, maintain, defend and enforce the licensed patents.

We may be subject to claims arising from consultants or contractors misappropriating intellectual property.

Many of our consultants and contractors were previously or are concurrently employed at or engaged by biotechnology companies, and/or other pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors, or academic research institutions. Some of these consultants and contractors, including each member of our senior management or our other employees, may have executed proprietary rights, nondisclosure and non-competition agreements in connection with such previous or concurrent employment. We may be subject to claims that we or our consultants and contractors have used or disclosed the intellectual property and other proprietary information or know-how or trade secrets of others in their work for us. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. We are not aware of any threatened or pending claims related to these matters or concerning agreements with our senior management, or other of our employees, consultants and contractors, but litigation may be necessary in the future to defend against such claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, or personnel or access to consultants and contractors. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management.

In addition, while our policy is to require our consultants and contractors who may be involved in the development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party who in fact develops intellectual property that we regard as our own, which may result in claims by or against us related to the ownership of such intellectual property. If we fail in prosecuting or defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights. Even if we are successful in prosecuting or defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to our management and scientific personnel.

Our reliance on third parties requires us to share our trade secrets, which increases the possibility that a competitor will discover them or that our trade secrets will be misappropriated or disclosed.

Because we expect to rely on third parties to manufacture our product candidates, and we expect to continue to collaborate with third parties on the development of our product candidates, we must, at times, share trade secrets with them. We seek to protect our proprietary technology in part by entering into confidentiality agreements and, if applicable, material transfer agreements, consulting agreements or other similar agreements with our advisors, employees, third-party contractors and consultants prior to beginning research or disclosing proprietary information. These agreements typically limit the rights of the third parties to use or disclose our confidential information, including our trade secrets. Despite the contractual provisions employed when working with third parties, the need to share trade secrets and other confidential information increases the risk that such trade secrets become known by our competitors, are inadvertently incorporated into the technology of others, or are disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Any disclosure, either intentional or unintentional, by our employees, the employees of third parties with whom we share our facilities or third-party consultants and vendors that we engage to perform research, clinical trials or manufacturing activities, or misappropriation by third parties (such as through a cybersecurity breach) of our trade secrets or proprietary information could enable competitors to duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus eroding our competitive position in our market. Further, adequate remedies may not exist in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure. Given that our proprietary position is based, in part, on our know-how and trade secrets, a competitor's discovery of our trade secrets or other unauthorized use or disclosure would impair our competitive position and may harm our business and results of operations.

In addition, these agreements typically restrict the ability of our advisors, employees, third-party contractors and consultants to publish data potentially relating to our trade secrets, although our agreements may contain certain limited publication rights. Policing unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and we may be unable to determine the extent of any unauthorized use. Moreover, enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. Despite our efforts to protect our trade secrets, our competitors may discover our trade secrets, either through breach of our agreements with third parties, independent development or publication of information by any of our third-party collaborators. A competitor's discovery of our trade secrets would impair our competitive position and have an adverse impact on our business.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

In addition to seeking patents for our product candidates, we also rely on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information, to maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect our trade secrets, in part, by entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to them, such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors and other third parties. We also enter into confidentiality and invention or patent assignment agreements with our employees and consultants. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. Monitoring unauthorized uses and disclosures of our intellectual property is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property will be effective. In addition, we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for any such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us. If any of our trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position would be harmed.

We use hazardous chemicals and biological materials in their business. Any claims relating to improper handling, storage or disposal of these materials could be time consuming and costly.

Our product manufacturing, research and development, and testing activities involve the controlled use of hazardous materials, including chemicals and biological materials. We cannot eliminate the risks of accidental contamination or the accidental discharge of these materials, or any resulting injury from such an event. We may be subjected to litigation for any injury that results from our use or the use by third parties of these materials, and our liability may exceed our insurance coverage and our total assets. Our use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these hazardous materials and specified waste products, as well as the discharge of pollutants into the environment and human health and safety matters, are governed by federal, state, provincial and local legislation. We are also subject to various laws and regulations relating to safe working conditions, laboratory and manufacturing practices. Our operations may require that environmental permits and approvals be issued by applicable government agencies, which can be costly and time-consuming to attain. These regulations and legislation can change, or new ones come into place, due to future legislative or administrative actions. These events could cause us to incur additional expense or restrict our operations. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations, current or future, may be expensive and prohibitive for our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply could incur substantial costs and liabilities, including civil or criminal fines and penalties, clean-up costs or capital expenditures to achieve and maintain compliance.

If product liability lawsuits are brought against us then we may incur substantial liabilities and may be required to limit commercialization of the Product, if approved, and any other future products.

We face a potential risk of product liability as a result of distribution of our product candidate for testing and commercialization of the Product. For example, we may face claims if use of the Product allegedly causes injury or is found to be otherwise unsuitable during product testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such product liability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in product quality, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product, negligence, strict liability and a breach of warranties. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer protection acts. If we cannot successfully defend ourself against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit commercialization of the product subject to such claims. Even successful defense would require significant financial and management resources. Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

● decreased demand for current and future products;

● injury to our reputation;

● costs to defend any related litigation;

● diversion of management's time and our resources;

● product recalls, withdrawals or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions;

● loss of revenue;

● inability to commercialize the Product and other products, if approved;

● decline in our stock price; and

● exposure to adverse publicity.

Although we currently have general liability insurance in place, we do not know whether the limits of the insurance will be sufficient to satisfy any claims should they arise. We may not have sufficient resources to pay for any liabilities resulting from a claim excluded from or beyond the limits of, our insurance coverage. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against a product liability claim, we may incur substantial liabilities.

Our employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, consultants, commercial partners and vendors may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including non-compliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading, which could significantly harm our business.

We are exposed to the risk that employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, consultants, commercial partners and vendors may engage in fraudulent or other illegal activity, fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless or negligent conduct or disclosure of unauthorized activities to us that violates: (i) the law and regulations of the FDA and non-U.S. regulators, including those laws that require the reporting of true, complete and accurate information to the FDA and non-U.S. regulators, (ii) healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations in the United States and elsewhere and (iii) laws that require the true, complete and accurate reporting of financial information or data. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, misconduct, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Misconduct in violation of these laws may also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct by our executives, employees, consultants and other third parties, and any precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with these laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourself or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, possible exclusion from participation in national healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings and curtailment of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations.

We may be unable to adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information.

We rely on trade secrets to protect our proprietary technological advances and know-how, especially where we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. However, trade secrets are difficult to protect. We rely in part on confidentiality agreements with our consultants, contractors, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors, including the third parties we rely on to manufacture the product, to protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information. However, any party with whom we have executed such an agreement may breach that agreement and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets.

Accordingly, these agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of confidential information and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights. In addition, others may independently discover our trade secrets and proprietary information. Failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could enable competitors to use our proprietary information to develop products that compete with our products or cause additional, material adverse effects upon our competitive business position and financial results.

Lawsuits relating to intellectual property infringement will be costly and time consuming.

We may be required to initiate litigation to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights. These lawsuits can be very time consuming and costly. There is a substantial amount of litigation involving patent and other intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical industry generally. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating expenses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any future sales, marketing or distribution activities.

In infringement litigation, any award of monetary damages we receive may not be commercially valuable. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information and trade secrets could be compromised by disclosure during litigation. Moreover, there can be no assurance that we will have sufficient financial or other resources to file and pursue such infringement claims, which typically last for years before they are resolved. Further, any claims we assert against a perceived infringer could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us alleging that we have infringed their patents. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.

In addition, our patents and patent applications could face other challenges, such as interference proceedings, opposition proceedings, reissue, inter partes review, re-examination proceedings, third-party submissions of prior art, and other forms of post-grant review. Any of these challenges, if successful, could result in the invalidation of, or in a narrowing of the scope or preventing the issuance of, any of our patents and patent applications subject to challenge. Any of these challenges, regardless of their success, would likely be time consuming and expensive to defend and resolve and would divert our management and scientific personnel's time and attention.

In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments, and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our securities.

Intellectual property disputes could distract our personnel from their normal responsibilities.

Even if resolved in our favor, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may cause us to incur significant expenses and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the market price of our securities. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any future sales, marketing or distribution activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings.

Our directors may serve as directors of other biotech companies and may have conflicts of interest.

Certain of our directors and executive officers may, from time to time, be employed by or affiliated with organizations which have entered into agreements or will enter into agreements with us. As disputes may arise between these organizations and us, or certain of these organizations may undertake or have undertaken research with our competitors, there exists the possibility for such persons to be in a position of conflict. We cannot assure that any decision or recommendation made by these persons involving us will be made in accordance with his or her duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with us and such other organizations.

Our business is affected by macroeconomic conditions.

Various macroeconomic factors could adversely affect our business and the results of our operations and financial condition, including changes in inflation, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates tariffs and trade sanctions on goods, and overall economic conditions and uncertainties, including those resulting from political instability and the current and future conditions in the global financial markets. For instance, if inflation or other factors were to significantly increase our business costs, it may not be feasible to pass through price increases to patients. Interest rates, the liquidity of the credit markets and the volatility of the capital markets could also affect the value of our investments and our ability to liquidate our investments in order to fund our operations, if necessary.

Interest rates and the ability to access credit markets could also adversely affect the ability of payors and distributors to purchase, pay for and effectively distribute our products if and when approved. Similarly, these macroeconomic factors could affect the ability of our current or potential future contract manufacturers, sole-source or single-source suppliers, or licensees to remain in business or otherwise manufacture or supply our products. Failure by any of them to remain in business could affect our ability to manufacture our products.

We may be responsible for corruption and anti-bribery law violations.

Our business activities are subject to the to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the "FCPA") and other anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws of the United States and other countries in which we operate, as well as U.S. and certain foreign export controls and trade sanctions which generally prohibit companies and company employees from engaging in bribery or other prohibited payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business.

Our employees or other agents may, without our knowledge and despite our efforts, engage in prohibited conduct under our policies and procedures and the FCPA or other anti-bribery laws for which we may be held responsible. If our employees or other agents are found to have engaged in such practices, we could suffer severe penalties and other consequences that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to foreign exchange risks.

As we grow and do business in foreign markets, including the United States and Europe, it is quite possible that transactions will take place in foreign currencies. At this point we do not participate in hedging activities. Although we cannot predict the effect of possible foreign exchange losses in the future, if such losses occurred, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation, and financial condition. In addition, fluctuations in exchange rates could affect the pricing of our products and negatively influence customer demand.

We are subject to taxation risks and changing rules by different tax authorities.

Tax examinations are often complex as tax authorities may disagree with the treatment of items reported by us, the result of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We believe that we will be treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

As discussed more fully under "U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations," we believe that, pursuant to Section 7874 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), even though we are organized as a corporation under the laws of Ontario, Canada, the Company will be treated as a U.S. domestic corporation for all purposes of the Code. The Company will therefore be taxed as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its worldwide income. The Company is also subject to tax in Canada. It is unclear how the foreign tax credit rules under the Code will operate in certain circumstances, given our treatment as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and the taxation of the Company in Canada. Accordingly, it is possible that we will be subject to double taxation with respect to all or part of our taxable income.

In addition, if the Company pays dividends to a Non-U.S. Holder, as defined in the discussion under the heading "U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations," it will be required to withhold U.S. income tax at the rate of 30%, or such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable income tax treaty. Each investor is urged to consult its own tax adviser regarding the U.S. federal income tax position of the Company and the tax consequences of holding our common shares and our warrants.

We are subject to a number of risks and hazards, of which not all of them may be sufficiently insured for.

Our business will be subject to a number of risks and hazards generally, including general liability. Such occurrences could result in damage to property, inventory, facilities, personal injury or death to end-customers or operators, damage to our properties or the properties of others, monetary losses and possible legal liability. Although we maintain insurance to protect against certain risks in such amounts as we consider to be reasonable, our insurance will not cover all the potential risks associated with our operations. We may also be unable to maintain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance coverage may not continue to be available or may not be adequate to cover any resulting liability. We might also become subject to liability which may not be insured against or which we may elect not to insure against because of premium costs or other reasons. Losses from these events may cause us to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect upon our financial performance and results of operations.

Risks related to health epidemics and pandemics.

Unfavorable global conditions, including as a result of health and safety concerns related to global pandemics, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our operations could be adversely affected by general conditions in the global economy, including conditions that are outside of our control, such as the impact of health and safety concerns from global pandemics like the coronavirus (COVID‑19) outbreak. The most recent global financial crisis caused by the coronavirus outbreak has resulted in extreme volatility and disruptions in the capital and credit markets. A weak or declining economy could also strain our supply channels.

Risks Related to Marketing, Reimbursement, Healthcare Regulations and Ongoing Regulatory Compliance

Coverage and reimbursement may be limited or unavailable in certain market segments for the Product, which could make it difficult for us to sell the Product profitably.

The success of the Product, if approved, depends on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors, including government agencies. There is significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. Coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which a therapeutic is approved by the FDA or comparable regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions.

In the United States and some other jurisdictions, patients who are provided medical treatment for their conditions generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with their treatment. Adequate coverage and reimbursement from governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid in the United States and commercial payors are critical to new product acceptance.

Government authorities and other third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide which drugs and treatments they will cover and the amount of reimbursement. In the United States, the principal decisions about reimbursement for new medicines are typically made by CMS an agency within the United States.

Department of Health and Human Services. CMS decides whether and to what extent a new medicine will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare, and private payors often follow CMS' coverage decisions. Other jurisdictions have agencies, such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in the United Kingdom, that evaluate the use and cost effectiveness of therapies, which impact the utilization and price of the medicine in such jurisdiction.

In the United States, no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for products exists among third-party payors. As a result, obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval of a product from a government or other third-party payor is a time consuming and costly process that could require Medicus to provide to each payor supporting scientific, clinical and cost effectiveness data for the use of products on a payor-by-payor basis, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be obtained. Even if Medicus obtains coverage for a given product, the resulting reimbursement payment rates might not be adequate for Medicus to maintain pricing sufficient to achieve or sustain profitability or may require copayments that patients find unacceptably high.

Medicus intends to seek approval to market the Product in different jurisdictions, which could include Canada and other selected foreign jurisdictions in addition to the United States. If Medicus obtains approval in any of these jurisdictions for the Product, Medicus will be subject to rules and regulations in those jurisdictions. Market acceptance and sales of the Product will depend significantly on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third party payors for the Product and may be affected by existing and future health care reform measures.

Our relationship with healthcare providers and physicians and third-party payors will be subject to applicable antikickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.

Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors in the United States, Canada, and elsewhere play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. If we obtain FDA approval for any product candidates and begin commercializing those products in the United States, our current and future arrangements with healthcare providers, third-party payors, customers, and others may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations. In particular, the research of product candidates, as well as the promotion, sales and marketing of healthcare items and services, as well as certain business arrangements in the healthcare industry, are subject to extensive laws designed to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, structuring and commission(s), certain customer incentive programs and other business or financial arrangements.

The applicable U.S. federal, state and other healthcare laws and regulations laws that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not limited to:

● the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual, or the purchase, lease, order, arrangement, or recommendation of any good, facility, item or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. A person or entity can be found guilty of violating the statute without actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it. The term remuneration has been interpreted broadly to include anything of value. Further, courts have found that if "one purpose" of renumeration is to induce referrals, the federal Anti-Kickback statute is violated. Violations are subject to significant civil and criminal fines and penalties for each violation, plus up to three times the remuneration involved, imprisonment, and exclusion from government healthcare programs. In addition, a claim submitted for payment to any federal healthcare program that includes items or services that were made as a result of a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal False Claims Act, or FCA. The Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand and prescribers, purchasers, and formulary managers, among others, on the other. There are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution;

● the federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the FCA, and civil monetary penalty laws which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, false, fictitious or fraudulent claims for payment to, or approval by Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal healthcare programs; knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false, fictitious or fraudulent claim or an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government; or knowingly concealing or knowingly and improperly avoiding, decreasing or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. A claim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim under the FCA. Manufacturers can be held liable under the FCA even when they do not submit claims directly to government payors if they are deemed to "cause" the submission of false or fraudulent claims. The FCA also permits a private individual acting as a "whistleblower" to bring qui tam actions on behalf of the federal government alleging violations of the FCA and to share in any monetary recovery or settlement. When an entity is determined to have violated the FCA, the government may impose civil fines and penalties for each false claim, plus treble damages, and exclude the entity from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs;

● the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which created additional federal criminal statutes that prohibit knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors, or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private), and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation, or making or using any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services relating to healthcare matters. Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity can be found guilty of violating HIPAA fraud provisions without actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it;

● HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, and their respective implementing regulations, which impose, among other things, certain requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information on certain covered healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses, known as covered entities, as well as their respective "business associates," those independent contractors or agents of covered entities that create, receive, maintain, transmit or obtain protected health information in connection with providing a service on behalf of a covered entity. HITECH also created new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys' fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In addition, there are additional federal, state and non-U.S. laws which govern the privacy and security of health and other personal information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts;

● the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act, created under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or, collectively, the Affordable Care Act, and its implementing regulations, which require manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to CMS information related to direct or indirect payments and other transfers of value made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors) and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by the physicians and their immediate family members. Effective January 1, 2022, these reporting obligations will extend to include transfers of value made in the previous year to certain non-physician providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners;

● federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers; and

● analogous U.S. state, local and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including private insurers and may be broader in scope than their federal equivalents; state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry's voluntary compliance guidelines and other relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; state and foreign laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers, marketing expenditures or drug pricing; state and local laws that require the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives; and state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of health information, some of which may be more stringent than those in the United States (such as the European Union, which adopted the General Data Protection Regulation, which became effective in May 2018) in certain circumstances, and may differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.

The distribution of pharmaceutical products is subject to additional requirements and regulations, including extensive record-keeping, licensing, storage and security requirements intended to prevent the unauthorized sale of pharmaceutical products.

The scope and enforcement of each of these laws is uncertain and subject to rapid change in the current environment of healthcare reform, especially in light of the lack of applicable precedent and regulations. Ensuring business arrangements comply with applicable healthcare laws, as well as responding to possible investigations by government authorities, can be time-and resource-consuming, costly, and can divert a company's attention from the business.

It is possible that governmental and enforcement authorities will conclude that our business practices, including our arrangements with physicians and other healthcare providers, may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law interpreting applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other government regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to significant sanctions, including civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, reputational harm, exclusion from participation in federal and state funded healthcare programs, contractual damages and the curtailment or restricting of our operations, as well as additional reporting obligations and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws. Further, if any of the physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to do business are found to be not in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to similar penalties. Any action for violation of these laws, even if successfully defended, could cause a pharmaceutical manufacturer to incur significant legal expenses and divert management's attention from the operation of the business. In addition, the approval and commercialization of any product candidate in other countries will also likely subject us to foreign equivalents of the healthcare laws mentioned above, among other foreign laws. All of these could harm our ability to operate our business and our financial results.

Ongoing healthcare legislative and regulatory reform measures may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Changes in U.S., Canadian, and foreign regulations, statutes or the interpretation of existing regulations could impact our business in the future by requiring, for example: (i) changes to our manufacturing arrangements; (ii) additions or modifications to product labeling; (iii) the recall or discontinuation of our products; or (iv) additional record-keeping requirements. If any such changes were to be imposed, they could adversely affect the operation of our business.

In the United States and in some foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and likely will continue to be, a number of legislative initiatives and regulatory changes regarding the healthcare system directed at broadening the availability of healthcare, improving the quality of healthcare, and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. For example, in March 2010, the ACA was enacted, which substantially changed the way health care is financed by both governmental and private insurers, and significantly impacted the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. The ACA, among other things, subjects biological products to potential competition by lower-cost biosimilars, expands the types of entities eligible for the 340B drug discount program; introduced a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected; increased the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and extended the rebate program to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations; established annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain branded prescription drugs; and created a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 50% (increased to 70% pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, or BBA, effective as of January 2019) point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer's outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D.

Since its enactment, there have been numerous judicial, administrative, executive, and legislative challenges to certain aspects of the ACA, and our expects there will be additional challenges and amendments to the ACA in the future. For example, various portions of the ACA are currently undergoing legal and constitutional challenges in the U.S. Supreme Court. Additionally, the Trump Administration has issued various Executive Orders which eliminated cost sharing subsidies and various provisions that would impose a fiscal burden on states or a cost, fee, tax, penalty or regulatory burden on individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices and Congress has introduced several pieces of legislation aimed at significantly revising or repealing the ACA. We cannot predict what affect further changes to the ACA would have on our business.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted. For example, on August 2, 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, was unable to reach required goals, thereby triggering the legislation's automatic reduction to several government programs, including aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal year. These reductions went into effect on April 1, 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, will remain in effect through 2030, unless additional Congressional action is taken. However, pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, and subsequent legislation, these Medicare sequester reductions are suspended from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers, including hospitals and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. Additionally, the BBA, among other things, amended the ACA, effective January 1, 2019, by increasing the point-of-sale discount (from 50% under the ACA to 70%) that is owed by pharmaceutical manufacturers who participate in Medicare Part D and closing the coverage gap in most Medicare drug plans, commonly referred to as the "donut hole."

Moreover, payment methodologies may be subject to changes in healthcare legislation and regulatory initiatives. For example, CMS may develop new payment and delivery models, such as bundled payment models. Recently, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their products. Such scrutiny has resulted in several recent U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs under Medicare, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs. For example, at the federal level, the Trump administration's budget proposal for fiscal year 2021 includes a $135 billion allowance to support legislative proposals seeking to reduce drug prices, increase competition, lower out-of-pocket drug costs for patients, and increase patient access to lower-cost generic and biosimilar drugs. On March 10, 2020, the Trump administration sent "principles" for drug pricing to Congress, calling for legislation that would, among other things, cap Medicare Part D beneficiary out of pocket pharmacy expenses, provide an option to cap Medicare Part D beneficiary monthly out-of-pocket expenses, and place limits on pharmaceutical price increases. HHS has solicited feedback on some of these measures and has implemented others under its existing authority. For example, in May 2019, CMS issued a final rule that would allow Medicare Advantage Plans the option of using step therapy, a type of prior authorization, for Part B drugs beginning January 1, 2020. This final rule codified CMS' policy change that was effective January 1, 2019.

Several regulations have also been proposed partly in response to several executive orders issued by President Trump related to prescription drug pricing that seek to implement several of the administration's proposals. For example, on November 20, 2020 CMS issued an Interim Final Rule implementing the Most Favored Nation, or MFN, Model under which Medicare Part B reimbursement rates will be calculated for certain drugs and biologicals based on the lowest price drug manufacturers receive in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries with a similar gross domestic product per capita. The MFN Model regulations mandate participation by identified Part B providers and will apply in all U.S. states and territories for a seven-year period beginning January 1, 2021, and ending December 31, 2027. The Interim Final Rule has not been finalized and is subject to revision and challenge. Additionally, on November 20, 2020, HHS finalized a regulation removing the safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers. While some of these and other measures may require additional authorization to become effective, and the Biden administration may reverse or otherwise change these measures, Congress has indicated that it will continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug costs. Several bills have been introduced in both chambers, but due to increased focus on COVID-19 relief efforts, it is not clear when, and if any, proposed legislation regarding drug costs will advance.

At the state level, legislatures are increasingly passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biologic product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions on coverage or access could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce the ultimate demand for the Product or put pressure on product pricing.

Our expects that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the extent to which state and federal governments cover particular healthcare products and services and could limit the amounts that the federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services. This could result in reduced demand for the Product or could result in additional pricing pressures.

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action in the United States. If we or any third parties we may engage are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or such third parties are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, the Product may lose any regulatory approval that may have been obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.

Risks Relating to Securities

We may experience fluctuations in market value.

The market price of publicly-traded securities is affected by many variables not directly related to our corporate performance, including the markets in which we are traded, the strength of the economy generally, the global economic situation and outlook, the availability and attractiveness of alternative investments, and the breadth of the public market for the securities. The effect of these and other factors on the market price of our securities in the future cannot be predicted.

Our securities could be subject to large price and volume volatility.

Market prices for the securities of biotechnology companies have historically been highly volatile. Our securities have and may continue to experience extreme price and volume volatility that may result in losses to shareholders. Accordingly, the trading price of our securities could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors including announcement of material events such as changes relating to new or improved technology, drug safety concerns and other general and industry-specific economic conditions.

Additionally, the securities markets in the United States have recently experienced a high level of price and volume volatility. It is expected that such fluctuations in volume and price will continue to occur which may make it difficult for a shareholder to sell our securities at a price equal to or above the price at which they were purchased.

Due to the small size of our public float following this offering, our securities may experience extreme price volatility unrelated to our actual or expected operating performance, financial condition, or prospects, making it difficult for prospective investors to assess the rapidly changing value of our securities.

In addition to the risks described elsewhere in this offering circular, we may be subject to extreme volatility that is unrelated to the underlying performance of our business. Recently, there have been instances of extreme share price run-ups followed by rapid price declines and strong share price volatility with a number of recent initial public offerings, especially among companies with relatively smaller public floats. We have and will continue to have upon completion of this offering,  a relatively small public float due to our relatively small existing public float on the Nasdaq, the relatively small size of this offering and the ownership percentage of our executive officers, directors and significant shareholders. As a relatively small-capitalization company with a relatively small public float, we may experience greater share price volatility, extreme price run-ups, lower trading volume, and less liquidity than large-capitalization companies. In particular, our securities may be subject to rapid and substantial price volatility, low volumes of trades, and large spreads in bid and ask prices. Such volatility, including any stock run-up, may be unrelated to our actual or expected operating performance, financial condition, or prospects, making it difficult for prospective investors to assess the rapidly changing value of our securities.

In addition, if the trading volumes of our securities are low, persons buying or selling in relatively small quantities may easily influence prices of our securities. This low volume of trades could also cause the price of our securities to fluctuate greatly, with large percentage changes in price occurring in any trading day session. Holders of our securities may also not be able to readily liquidate their investment or may be forced to sell at depressed prices due to low volume trading. Broad market fluctuations and general economic and political conditions may also adversely affect the market price of our securities. As a result of this volatility, investors may experience losses on their investment in our securities. A decline in the market price of our securities also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional securities and our ability to obtain additional financing in the future. No assurance can be given that an active U.S. market in our securities will develop or be sustained. If a more active market does not develop, holders of our securities may be unable to readily sell the securities they hold or may not be able to sell their securities at all.

This is a “best efforts” offering; no minimum amount of Securities is required to be sold, and we may not raise the amount of capital we believe is required for our business.

There is no required minimum number of Units that must be sold as a condition to completion of this offering. Because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to the closing of this offering, the actual offering amount, and proceeds to us are not presently determinable and may be substantially less than the maximum amounts set forth in this offering circular. We may sell fewer than all of the Units offered hereby, which may significantly reduce the amount of proceeds received by us, and investors in this offering will not receive a refund in the event that we do not sell an amount of Units sufficient to pursue the business goals outlined in this offering circular. Thus, we may not raise the amount of capital we believe is required for our business and may need to raise additional funds, which may not be available or available on terms acceptable to us. Despite this, any proceeds from the sale of the Units offered by us will be available for our immediate use, and because there is no escrow account and no minimum offering amount in this offering, investors could be in a position where they have invested in us, but we are unable to fulfill our objectives due to a lack of interest in this offering.

We will need to raise additional financing in the future which may dilute our share capital.

Our articles permit the issuance of an unlimited number of common shares. Future issuance of our common shares will result in dilution to the existing shareholders. Additionally, future sales of our common shares into the public market may lower the market price for our securities, which may result in losses to our shareholders. Sales of substantial amounts of our common shares into the public market, or even the perception by the market that such sales may occur, may lower the market price of our securities.

We have no history of dividends.

To date, we have not paid any dividends on our outstanding common shares. We currently intend to retain future earnings to finance the operation, development and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common shares in the foreseeable future. Any decision to pay dividends on our shares will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, financial requirements and other conditions existing at such time. See "Dividend Policy."

Future sales of our common shares by our existing shareholders could cause the price of our securities to decline.

Subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, our officers, directors and significant shareholders may sell some or all of their common shares in the future. No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, such future sales of our common shares will have on the market price of our securities prevailing from time to time. However, the future sale of a substantial number of common shares by such persons or the perception that such sales could occur, could cause the price of our securities to decline.

We may issue, without shareholder approval, preferred shares that have rights and preferences potentially superior to those of our common shares.

Our articles permit the issuance of an unlimited number of preferred shares (the "Medicus Preferred Shares") in one or more series. Medicus Preferred Shares are entitled to priority over our common shares with respect to the distribution of our assets in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs, whether voluntary or involuntary. Subject to any applicable regulatory approvals, our board of directors may set the rights and preferences of any series of Medicus Preferred Shares in its sole discretion without shareholder approval. The rights and preferences of those Medicus Preferred Shares may be superior to those of our common shares. Accordingly, the issuance of Medicus Preferred Shares may adversely affect the rights of holders of our common shares.

If equity research analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they issue unfavorable commentary or downgrade our common shares, the price of our securities could decline.

The trading market for our securities could be influenced by research and reports that industry and/or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, the market or our competitors. We do not have any control over these analysts and cannot assure that such analysts will cover us or provide favorable coverage. If any of the analysts who may cover our business change their recommendation regarding our common shares adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors, the share price would likely decline. If any analysts who may cover our business were to cease coverage or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the share price or trading volume to decline.

An investment in this offering may result in uncertain or adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.

An investment in this offering may result in uncertain or adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences. For instance, the allocation an investor makes with respect to the purchase price of a unit between the common share and the warrant included in each Unit could be challenged by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") or courts. Furthermore, the U.S. federal income tax consequences of a cashless exercise of warrants and distributions on warrants are unclear under current law, and the adjustment to the exercise price of the warrants could give rise to dividend income to investors without a corresponding payment of cash. See "United States Federal Income Tax Considerations" for a summary of the U.S. federal income tax considerations of an investment in our securities. Prospective investors are urged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to these and other tax consequences when purchasing, holding or disposing of our securities.

Risks Relating to New Securities

There is no public market for the warrants being offered hereby, and we do not expect one to develop to provide you with adequate liquidity.

The warrants offered hereby will not be listed on any Canadian or U.S. securities exchange. Consequently, there is no public trading market for the warrants, and we do not expect a market to develop. Accordingly, investors may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of, the warrants. This lack of a trading market could result in investors being unable to liquidate their investment in the warrants or to sell them at a price that reflects their value.

Risks Related to Being a Public Company

As a result of recently becoming a public company in the United States, we have become subject to additional regulatory compliance requirements, including Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and if we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud.

Our management team may not successfully or effectively manage our transition to a U.S. public company that will be subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under U.S. and Canadian securities laws. Our limited experience in dealing with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to U.S. and Canadian public companies could be a significant disadvantage in that it is likely that an increasing amount of their time may be devoted to these activities which will result in less time being devoted to the management and growth of the post-combination company. We may not have adequate personnel with the appropriate level of knowledge, experience and training in the accounting policies, practices or internal control over financial reporting required of public companies in the United States and Canada.

As a public company listed on the Nasdaq, the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act requires, among other things that we assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at the end of each fiscal year. We anticipate being first required to issue management's assessment of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act in connection with issuing our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025.

We have started the process of designing, implementing and testing our internal control over financial reporting required to comply with Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act. This process is time‑consuming, costly and complicated. Our management may not be able to effectively and timely implement controls and procedures that adequately respond to the increased regulatory compliance and reporting requirements that are applicable to us as a public company listed on the Nasdaq. If we fail to maintain internal control over financial reporting adequate to meet the demands that will be placed upon us as a public company listed in the United States, our business and reputation may be harmed, the accuracy and timeliness of our financial reporting may be adversely affected, and the price of our shares may decline.

In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting beginning with our annual report following the date on which we are no longer an "emerging growth company," which may be up to five fiscal years following the date of this offering.

If we are unable for any reason to meet the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq, such action or inaction could result in a delisting of our common shares and our Public Warrants, as applicable.

If we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq (for example, the Nasdaq corporate governance requirements or the minimum closing bid price requirement), such exchanges may take steps to delist our common shares and our Public Warrants, as applicable. Such a delisting would likely have a negative effect on the price of our common shares and our Public Warrants and would impair your ability to sell or purchase our common shares and our Public Warrants, as applicable, when you wish to do so. In the event of a delisting, we can provide no assurance that any action taken by us to restore compliance with listing requirements would allow our common shares and our Public Warrants, as applicable, to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of our common shares and our Public Warrants, as applicable, prevent such securities from dropping below any minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non‑compliance with the Nasdaq’s listing requirements.

There is a risk that we will fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls and our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be adversely affected. We may identify material weaknesses in our internal controls over financing reporting which we may not be able to remedy in a timely manner.

As a U.S. public company, we operate in an increasingly demanding regulatory environment, which requires us to comply with the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act, the regulations of the Nasdaq, the rules and regulations of the SEC and Canadian securities regulators, expanded disclosure requirements, accelerated reporting requirements and more complex accounting rules. Company responsibilities required by the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act include establishing corporate oversight and adequate internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. Effective internal controls are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to help prevent financial fraud. Prior to the closing of the offering, we have never been required to test our internal controls within a specified period and, as a result, we may experience difficulty in meeting these reporting requirements in a timely manner.

We anticipate that the process of building our accounting and financial functions and infrastructure may require significant additional professional fees, internal costs and management efforts. We may need to enhance and/or implement a new internal system to combine and streamline the management of our financial, accounting, human resources and other functions. However, the enhancement and/or implementation of a system may result in substantial costs. Any disruptions or difficulties in implementing or using such a system could adversely affect our controls and harm our business. Moreover, such disruption or difficulties could result in unanticipated costs and diversion of management's attention. In addition, we may discover additional weaknesses in our system of internal financial and accounting controls and procedures that could result in a material misstatement of our financial statements. Our internal control over financial reporting will not prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected.

If we do not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely manner, or if we are unable to maintain proper and effective internal controls, we may not be able to produce timely and accurate financial statements. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and results of operations could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the Nasdaq, the SEC, Canadian securities regulators or other regulatory authorities.

We will incur increased costs as a result of our operation as a dual U.S.-Canadian reporting company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time and resources to employing new compliance initiatives in order to comport with the regulatory requirements applicable to public companies.

In connection with recently becoming a public company in the US, we have and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not previously incur. As a dual U.S.‑Canadian public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act, the Dodd‑Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as well as rules adopted, and to be adopted, by the SEC, Canadian securities regulators and the Nasdaq. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, we expect these rules and regulations to substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time‑consuming and costly. For example, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits or incur substantially higher costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs we may incur to respond to these requirements. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers.

We may be subject to securities litigation, which is expensive and could divert management attention.

The market price of our securities may be volatile, and in the past companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their shares have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Litigation of this type could result in substantial costs and diversion of management's attention and resources, which could adversely impact our business. Any adverse determination in litigation could also subject us to significant liabilities.

As we are organized under the laws of a Canadian province and certain of our directors and officers reside in Canada or the provinces thereof, it may be difficult for U.S. shareholders to effect service on us to realize on judgments obtained in the United States. Similarly, it may be difficult for Canadian investors to enforce civil liabilities against our directors and officers residing outside of Canada.

We are governed by the Business Corporations Act (Ontario), as now enacted or as the same may from time to time be amended, re-enacted or replaced ("OBCA"), certain of our directors and officers reside or are organized outside of the United States and a portion of our assets or the assets of these persons may be located outside the United States. Consequently, it may be difficult for investors who reside in the United States to effect service of process in the United States upon us or upon such persons who are not residents of the United States, or to realize upon judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. A judgment of a U.S. court predicated solely upon such civil liabilities may be enforceable in Canada by a Canadian court if the U.S. court in which the judgment was obtained had jurisdiction, as determined by the Canadian court, in the matter. Investors should not assume that Canadian courts: (i) would enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions against us or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws or the securities or blue sky laws of any state within the United States, or (ii) would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against us or such persons predicated upon the U.S. federal securities laws or any such state securities or blue sky laws. Similarly, some of our directors and officers are residents of countries other than Canada and all or a substantial portion of the assets of such persons are located outside Canada. As a result, it may be difficult for Canadian investors to initiate a lawsuit within Canada against these persons. In addition, it may not be possible for Canadian investors to collect from these persons judgments obtained in courts in Canada predicated on the civil liability provisions of securities legislation of certain of the provinces and territories of Canada. It may also be difficult for Canadian investors to succeed in a lawsuit in the United States based solely on violations of Canadian securities laws.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We do not anticipate that we will declare or pay dividends in the foreseeable future on our common shares. Instead, we anticipate that all of our earnings will be used for the operation and growth of our business. Any future determination to declare cash dividends would be subject to the discretion of our board of directors and would depend upon various factors, including our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity requirements, restrictions that may be imposed by applicable law and our contracts and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our consolidated capitalization as of September 30, 2024:

This table should be read in conjunction with the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Use of Proceeds" sections, as well as our audited financial statements, included elsewhere in this offering circular.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering will be approximately $10,555,554, assuming a public offering price of $5.50 per Unit, which represents the high end of the offering price range herein, after deducting commissions of approximately $916,667, and estimated offering expenses payable by us of $750,000.

In addition, we would receive up to an aggregate of approximately $             million from the exercise of the warrants, assuming the exercise in full of all such warrants for cash.

We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to fund our Phase 2 proof of concept clinical trial for treatment of basal cell carcinoma using our doxorubicin tip loaded dissolvable microarray needle skinpatch. We may also use the net proceeds of this offering to expand our exploratory phase 2 clinical trial to a pivotal trial and/or to expand our trials to cover other non-melanoma skin diseases. We will use any remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes and working capital.

The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures will depend on numerous factors, the timing and success of any clinical trials and preclinical studies we may commence in the future, the timing of regulatory submissions, the status of our sales and marketing efforts, the amounts of proceeds actually raised in this offering and the amount of cash generated by our operations. Because we operate in a very dynamic and highly competitive industry, the actual use of proceeds may differ substantially from the ranges indicated above. Our management will have broad discretion to allocate the net proceeds from this offering.

DILUTION

If you invest in our Units in this offering, your interest will be immediately diluted to the extent of the difference between the public offering price per common share that is part of a Unit in this offering and the adjusted net tangible book value per common share after this offering. Dilution results from the fact that the public offering price per common share is substantially in excess of the net tangible book value per common share. As of September 30, 2024, we had a historical net tangible book value of $0.32 per common share after giving effect to the Share Consolidation. Our net tangible book value per share represents total tangible assets less total liabilities, divided by the number of common shares outstanding on September 30, 2024.

After giving effect to the sale of Units in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $5.50 per Unit (which represents the high end of the offering price range herein), after deducting the estimated commissions and estimated offering expenses, our as adjusted net tangible book value at September 30, 2024 would have been $1.07 per share. This represents an immediate increase in as adjusted net tangible book value of $0.75 per share to existing shareholders and immediate dilution of $4.43 per share to new investors.

The following table illustrates this dilution per common share:

We may choose to raise additional capital due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of these securities could result in further dilution to our equity holders.

The above discussion and tables are based on approximately 10,846,721 common shares outstanding as of September 30, 2024 and excludes approximately 887,500 common shares then issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options, at exercise prices ranging from C$1.16 to C$4.84 and expiry dates ranging from October 24, 2028 to June 25, 2029.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this offering circular. This discussion and other parts of this offering circular contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors, including those set forth under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this offering circular.

Overview

The Company is a biotech/life sciences company focused accelerating the clinical development programs of novel and disruptive therapeutic assets. Currently, we are developing one product, SkinJect^TM, with an indication for basal cell carcinoma.

The Company's principal purpose is to advance the clinical development program of "SkinJect", while opportunistically identifying, evaluating and acquiring accretive assets, properties, businesses or licensing rights.

For additional information regarding the business of the Company and the regulatory environment in which it operates, please refer to the offering circular under the heading "Our Business."

Business Combination Agreement

On March 17, 2023, as amended on May 12, 2023 and August 29, 2023, the Company entered into a business combination agreement with RBx and SkinJect under which the Company entered into a reverse takeover transaction ("RTO") with SkinJect on September 29, 2023. The RTO transaction included a concurrent financing of $5,109,950. SkinJect converted all its shares of equity and securities convertible into equity into common shares to facilitate the RTO. Effective September 29, 2023, Interactive Capital Partners Corporation ("Interactive") changed its name to Medicus Pharma Ltd.

Interactive and SkinJect were combined via the purchase of SkinJect which constituted a reverse takeover of Interactive by the shareholders of SkinJect. Interactive acquired all of the issued and outstanding common shares of SkinJect and issued to each former shareholder of SkinJect (other than Interactive) the number of common shares in the capital of the Company as described below. In connection with and as a closing condition of the RTO, Interactive raised aggregate gross proceeds of $5,109,950 through the issuance of 1,277,488 common shares at a price of $4.00 per share.

Pursuant to the terms of the RTO, all outstanding financial instruments of SkinJect were converted into shares of SkinJect common shares (except that $1,000,000 of SkinJect's convertible notes were exchanged directly for 261,781 common shares of the Company). The SkinJect preferred shares, convertible promissory notes and note payable were converted into 14,900,000 shares of SkinJect common shares. Following the conversion of the financial instruments into common shares there were 21,334,000 shares of SkinJect common shares issued and outstanding which were then consolidated on a 3.413443-to-1 basis into 6,249,995 shares of SkinJect common shares. Interactive acquired all of the issued and outstanding SkinJect shares and issued Interactive common shares to the SkinJect shareholders.

Immediately prior to the completion of the RTO, the 7,249,999 Interactive common shares outstanding were consolidated into 287,471 common shares on a 25.219932-to-1 basis.

Upon closing of the transaction, the Company assumed $2,071,580 in transaction costs incurred by RBx that related to the RTO. The consideration paid to acquire Interactive consisted of net liabilities assumed of $50,000 and the value of the shares exchanged with Interactive, valued at $1,149,882, which was expensed on completion of the RTO.

Selected Financial Information

The following table sets forth selected financial information with respect to the Company. The selected financial information has been derived from the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and the audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2023.

As of the date of this offering circular, we have not earned revenue and we do not expect to generate revenue in the near future.

Discussion of Operations

The following table outlines our statements of loss and comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022:

Comparison of Nine Months ended September 30, 2024 and Nine Months ended September 30, 2023

General and administrative

General and administrative ("G&A") expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023 are comprised of:

Professional fees increased by $1,012,272 or 810% and $2,327,679 or 481% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the equivalent periods in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to increases in legal and accounting fees related to the Company's registration statement filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Consulting fees increased by $357,405 or 596% and $1,176,599 or 654% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the equivalent periods in the prior year. Consulting fees include fees paid to individuals and professional firms who provide advisory services to the Company and fluctuate from period to period based on the nature of the transactions the Company undertakes.

Salaries, wages and benefits increased by $279,358 or 100% and $819,717 or 100% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the equivalent periods in the prior year. The Company did not have employees in the equivalent periods of the prior year.

General office, insurance and administration expenditures increased by $155,054 or 10271% and $518,057 832% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the equivalent periods in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to the Company now incurring more significant insurance related expenses and general office related expenditures in support of expanded operations.

Investor relations costs increased by $210,954 or 100% and $440,484 or 100% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the equivalent periods in the prior year. Investor relations expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, were incurred as a result of the Company becoming a listed public entity after the RTO transaction.

There is an expected increase in general and administrative expenses associated with being a public company, including costs related to accounting, audit, legal, regulatory, and tax-related services associated with maintaining compliance with applicable securities law requirements; additional director and officer insurance costs; and investor and public relations costs.

Research and development

Research and development ("R&D") costs include costs incurred under agreements with third-party contract research organizations, contract manufacturing organizations and other third parties that conduct preclinical and clinical activities on our behalf and manufacture our product candidates, and other costs associated with our R&D programs, including laboratory materials and supplies.

R&D expenses increased by $737,119 or 1825% and $2,003,597 or 1259% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the equivalent periods in the prior year. This increase is primarily due to costs incurred related to SKNJCT-003.

As of the date of this offering circular, the Company has activated nine clinical sites in the United States and has randomized more than 50% of the 60 patients expected to be enrolled in the study. In addition, the Company expects to complete an interim data analysis before the end of the first quarter of 2025 and to submit its findings to the FDA as a part of a package seeking a meeting with the FDA to advance clinical development.

We expect our R&D expenses to increase substantially for the foreseeable future as we continue with the SKNJCT-003 study and trials.

The principal risks related to the Company's future performance are that the trials are unsuccessful, the Company does not receive FDA approval to proceed with the next stage of its research and development, or the Company is unsuccessful in obtaining future funding needed to continue its research and development. These are customary risks for a development stage pharmaceutical Company and are less acute than for a Company with a less advanced product.  Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to complete its trials of the MNA, that the trials will be successful, or that the product will ultimately reach commercialization.

Depreciation

Depreciation increased by $26,322 or 100% and $78,395 or 100% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the equivalent periods in the prior year. Depreciation is the result of a right-of-use asset related to the new office lease.

Share-based compensation

Share-based compensation was $nil and $580,629 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to $nil and $nil for the equivalent periods in the prior year. Share-based compensation changes based on the variability in the number of options granted, vesting periods of the options and the grant date fair value. During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, the share-based compensation expense relates to the vesting of share options. On June 25, 2024, the Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting for all outstanding share options resulting in the Company recognizing the remaining expense for all share options outstanding and unvested as of that date.

Finance expense, net

Finance expense (income) decreased by $232,745 or 125% and $449,841 or 90% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the equivalent periods in the prior year. Finance expense (income) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, is primarily related to interest on convertible notes and the Company's office lease offset by interest income earned on short-term money market investments. Finance expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, was comprised of interest accretion on convertible promissory notes and dividend expense, partially offset by a fair value adjustment gain on the convertible promissory notes.

Comparison of Year ended December 31, 2023 and Year ended December 31, 2022

General and administrative

G&A expenses increased by $2,034,170 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase is primarily due to increased legal costs, professional fees and corporate activities related to preparation for the RTO transaction.

We expect an increase in G&A expenses associated with being a public company, including costs related to accounting, audit, legal, regulatory, and tax-related services associated with maintaining compliance with applicable securities law requirements; additional director and officer insurance costs; and investor and public relations costs.

Research and development

R&D expenses comprise primarily of consulting fees and external contract costs. In terms of the clinical study costs, the '002 efficacy study that commenced in 2022 was limited to treatment of placebo subjects.

R&D expenses decreased by $452,806 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. This decrease is primarily the result of limited costs associated with the suspended '002 study and the evaluation of MNA fabrication methods to improve MNA application and dissolution for the year ended December 31, 2023.

R&D costs include costs incurred under agreements with third-party contract research organizations, contract manufacturing organizations and other third parties that conduct preclinical and clinical activities on our behalf and manufacture our product candidates, and other costs associated with our R&D programs, including laboratory materials and supplies. As of the date of this offering circular, management of the Company anticipates only one amendment to the '002 study, which relates to the preparation process for the microneedle array. Although the Company expects this amendment to be considered a "minor amendment" by the FDA, there can be no assurance of the FDA's approval of the amendment.

We expect our R&D expenses to increase substantially for the foreseeable future as we initiate the SKNJCT-003 study to advance our product candidates into and through clinical trials, pursue regulatory approval of our product candidates and expand our pipeline of product candidates.

The principal risks related to the Company's future performance are that the MNA trials are unsuccessful, the Company does not receive FDA approval to proceed with the next stage of its research and development, or the Company unable to obtain future funding needed to continue its research and development. These are customary risks for a development stage pharmaceutical Company and are less acute than for a Company with a less advanced product. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to complete its trials of the MNA, that the trials will be successful, or that the product will ultimately reach commercialization.

Share-based compensation

Share-based compensation expense was $146,671 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $nil in the prior year. The Company granted 812,500 stock options in 2023.

Finance expense, net

Finance expense decreased by $213,387 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease for the year ended December 31, 2023 was primarily related to a fair value adjustment loss in 2023 versus a gain in 2022, and nine months of dividend expense in 2023 versus twelve months in 2022. This was partially offset by a $nil gain on modification in 2023 versus a gain in 2022, and an increase in accretion expense due to new convertible promissory notes.

Transaction expense

Transaction expense was $3,271,462 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $nil in the prior year. This expense was related to the RTO transaction and includes the cost to acquire Interactive and the costs incurred by RBx related to the transaction.

Summary of quarterly results

The following table sets forth selected unaudited quarterly results of operations data for each of the four quarters immediately preceding September 30, 2024. The information for each of these quarters has been derived from the condensed interim consolidated financial statements of the Company.  Financial data for the four quarters including and immediately preceding the RTO, which occurred on September 29, 2023, have been omitted.  Prior to the RTO, the Company existing as a shell company with no operations and its results of operations during this period are not relevant to its ongoing business.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financing

The general objectives of our capital management strategy are to preserve our capacity to continue operating, provide benefits to our stakeholders and provide an adequate return on investment to our shareholders by continuing to invest in our future in a manner that is commensurate with the level of operating risk we assume. We determine the total amount of capital required consistent with risk levels. This capital structure is adjusted on a timely basis depending on changes in the economic environment and risks of the underlying assets. We are not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements.

The financial statements and this offering circular have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of operations. The financial statements and this MD&A do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. Such adjustments could be material.

We currently do not earn any revenues from our preclinical programs and are therefore considered to be in the R&D stage. As required, the Company will continue to finance its operations through the sale of equity or pursue non-dilutive funding sources available to the Company in the future. The continuation of our R&D activities is dependent on our ability to obtain financing.

As at September 30, 2024, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $5,306,159 compared to cash and cash equivalents of $1,719,338 as of December 31, 2023. During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company received $5,172,500 of net proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes and $5,470,000 net proceeds from the issuance of common shares in a non-brokered private placement. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, cash used in operating activities was $6,980,076 compared to $769,657 for the equivalent period in the prior year. As at September 30, 2024, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $27,751,997 (December 31, 2023 - $18,871,062) and net loss and comprehensive loss of $2,959,216 and $8,880,935 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 (2023 - $2,963,692 and $3,936,284). The Company has a working capital surplus of $3,450,299 as at September 30, 2024 (December 31, 2023 - $1,111,448).

The Company does not expect to generate positive cash flow from operations for the foreseeable future due to additional R&D expenses, including expenses related to drug discovery, preclinical testing, clinical trials, chemistry, manufacturing and controls and operating expenses associated with supporting these activities. It is expected that negative cash flow from operations will continue until such time, if ever, that we receive regulatory approval to commercialize any of our products under development and/or we receive royalty or milestone revenue from any such products that exceeds our expenses.

Cash flows

Cash flows used in operating activities

Cash flows used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 were $6,980,076 compared to cash flows used in operating activities of $769,657 for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The increase is primarily due to increased spending on research and development and general and administrative expenses.

Cash flows used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2023, were $4,158,264 compared to cash flows used in operating activities of $1,057,103 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase is primarily due to increased spending related to preparation for the RTO.

Cash flows provided by financing activities

Cash flows provide by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, were $10,566,897 compared to cash flows provided by financing activities of $5,609,950 for the nine months ended September 30, 2023. The increase is primarily due to increased proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes and proceeds from the issuance of common shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2024.

Cash flows provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $5,609,950 compared to $1,246,241 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase is due to proceeds from a private placement financing of $5,109,950, and the issuance of $500,000 of convertible promissory notes during the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $1,096,241 of convertible promissory notes and $150,000 of the note payable issued in the year ended December 31, 2022.

Listing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $3,271,462. Listing expense is related to the reverse takeover transaction to become a publicly listed company in 2023.

Contractual Obligations

We have no significant contractual arrangements other than those noted in our financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Financial Instruments and Risk Management

The Company's financial instruments are exposed to certain risks as summarized below.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Market risk comprises three types of risk: currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk.

Currency risk

Currency risk is the risk to the Company's earnings that arises from fluctuations of foreign exchange rates. The Company's primary exposure with respect to foreign currencies is from Canadian dollar denominated trade and other payables. A 1% change in the foreign exchange rates would not result in any significant impact to the consolidated financial statements.

Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company is not exposed to interest rate risk as at September 30, 2024.

Other price risk

Other price risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices, other than those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk, whether those changes are caused by factors specific to the individual financial instrument or its issuer, or factors affecting all similar financial instruments traded in the market. The Company is not exposed to other price risks as at September 30, 2024.

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from deposits with banks and outstanding receivables. The Company does not hold any collateral as security but mitigates this risk by dealing only with what management believes to be financially sound counterparties and, accordingly, does not anticipate significant loss for non-performance.

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Company's exposure to liquidity risk is dependent on the Company's ability to raise additional capital to meet its commitments and sustain operations. The Company mitigates liquidity risk by management of working capital, cash flows, and the issuance of share capital.

The Company is obligated to the following contractual maturities of undiscounted cash flows as at September 30, 2024:

Fair values

The carrying values of cash and trade and other payables approximate the fair values due to the short-term nature of these items. The risk of material change in fair value is not considered to be significant due to a relatively short-term nature. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments to manage this risk.

Financial instruments recorded at fair value on the statements of financial position are classified using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. The Company categorizes its fair value measurements according to a three-level hierarchy. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used by the Company's valuation techniques. A level is assigned to each fair value measurement based on the lowest-level input significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

• Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices as at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

• Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

• Level 3 - Significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market inputs whenever such inputs exist. A financial instrument is classified to the lowest level of the hierarchy for which a significant input has been considered in measuring fair value.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Refer to Note 2 and Note 3 of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023, for a full discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates.

Outstanding Share Data

The Company has authorized unlimited common shares with no par value. Each holder of common shares is entitled to one vote for each share owned on all matters voted upon by shareholders.

The Company has 11,816,721 common shares issued and outstanding, 1,037,500 share options issued and outstanding and 970,000 warrants issued and outstanding as of the date of this MD&A.

Subsequent Events

On October 28, 2024, the Company effected a reverse stock split of its common shares at a ratio of 1-for-2 (the "Share Consolidation").  The Share Consolidation was approved by the shareholders of the Company on June 25, 2024 and by the board of directors of the Company on October 15, 2024.

After the completion of the Share Consolidation, the number of the Company's issued and outstanding common shares decreased from 21,693,560 to 10,846,721. The par value of the Company's common shares remains unchanged at $nil per share after the Share Consolidation. The Share Consolidation was completed in preparation for a proposed U.S. listing.

On November 14, 2024, the Company granted 100,000 share options to an officer of the Company with an exercise price of C$3.25 and an expiry date of November 14, 2029. Each share option can be exercised to acquire one common share of the Company. The share options will vest over 5 years.

On November 15, 2024, the Company closed its initial public offering in the United States of 970,000 units, at a price of $4.125 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one warrant to purchase one common share. The warrants have an exercise price of $4.64 per share and will expire 5 years from the date of issuance. In connection with the offering, the underwriter partially exercised its overallotment option and purchased an additional 145,500 warrants at $0.01 per warrant. The common shares and the warrants commenced trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols "MDCX" and "MDCXW," respectively on November 14, 2024.

On November 20, 2024, the Company granted 50,000 share options to a consultant of the Company with an exercise price of C$2.70 and an expiry date of November 20, 2029. Each share option can be exercised to acquire one common share of the Company. The share options are fully vested upon the date of grant.

OUR BUSINESS

Our company (formerly, Interactive Capital Partners Corporation) was incorporated pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on April 30, 2008 under the name Interactive Capital Partners Corporation. On September 29, 2023, we completed the Business Combination with SkinJect, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation ("SkinJect"), pursuant to a business combination agreement dated May 12, 2023, as amended, among the Company, SkinJect and RBx. The Business Combination resulted in a reverse takeover of the Company by the former shareholders of SkinJect, with SkinJect becoming a wholly owned operating subsidiary of the Company, and the Company being renamed "Medicus Pharma Ltd."

On October 11, 2023, our common shares commenced trading on the TSXV under the symbol "MDCX." On November 15, 2024, we completed our initial public offering in the United States and our common shares and Public Warrants began trading on the Nasdaq under the symbols "MDCX" and "MDCXW", respectively.

We are a biotech/life sciences company focused on accelerating the clinical development programs of novel and disruptive therapeutic assets. Currently, we are developing one product, SkinJect^TM, with an indication for basal cell carcinoma.

Our principal purpose is to advance the clinical development program of the Product, while opportunistically identifying, evaluating, and acquiring accretive assets, properties or businesses. Through our wholly owned subsidiary, SkinJect, we focus on the development of our in-licensed drug device combination product using novel dissolvable microneedle arrays for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers. Our combination product candidate is a doxorubicin tip-loaded D-MNA filed with the FDA under an Investigational New Drug Application and is regulated by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Registration (CDER), Oncology Division.

The business conducted by the Company prior to the Business Combination was undertaken by SkinJect. References to the Company in this section as at a date prior to the completion of the Business Combination relate to the business undertakings of SkinJect.

In 2016, SkinJect licensed certain intellectual property from the University of Pittsburgh. During 2016 and 2017, SkinJect developed validated manufacturing methods for the manufacture of the microneedle arrays covered by the licensed patents. In 2017 and 2018, SkinJect completed pre-clinical animal studies and related verification analyses.

In 2018, SkinJect prepared an IND application and submitted it to the FDA for the conduct of a dose escalation study in human subjects ("Phase 1 study"). The FDA issued a Study May Proceed letter in November 2018.The study was completed in March 2021 and the clinical study report showed that the study met its primary objective of safety and tolerability. The investigational product, D-MNA was found to be well-tolerated across all dose levels in all thirteen (13) participants enrolled in the study, with no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), serious adverse events (SAE), or study discontinuations. Furthermore, there were no systemic effects or clinically significant abnormal findings in laboratory parameters, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations. The clinical study report (CSR) also describes the efficacy of the investigational product, D-MNA, with 6 participants experiencing complete responses. The complete response is defined as the disappearance of basal cell carcinoma ("BCC") histologically in the final excision at the end of study visit. The participants profile, demonstrating complete responses, was diverse and all participants (6/6) had nodular subtype of BCC.

On January 3, 2024, we announced that we had submitted to the FDA a Phase 2 Investigational New Drug clinical protocol for the Product, which provides the Company with flexibility to potentially accelerate to a Phase 2 pivotal trial, subject to, among other things, sufficient capital resources to do so, or to decelerate its clinical trial to a Phase 2A trial.

Basal Cell Carcinoma Market Overview and Current Therapies

Basal cell carcinoma is a type of skin cancer that begins in the basal layer of the epidermis. It is the most common type of skin cancer.

Basal cell carcinoma often appears as a slightly transparent bump on the skin, though it can take other forms. Basal cell carcinoma occurs most often on areas of the skin that are exposed to the sun, such as your head and neck. Most basal cell carcinomas are thought to be caused by "long-term exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from sunlight" (Mayo Clinic). Additional factors that increase your risk of developing basal cell cancer include radiation therapy, fair skin, increasing age, family history and immune suppressing drugs.

Basal cell carcinomas account for approximately 80 percent of all non-melanoma skin cancers worldwide. (The Johns Hopkins University). Based on studies of populations in the United States, 40-50% of Americans who live to age 65 will experience BCC or squamous cell carcinoma at least once.

More than 5 million cases of basal cell carcinoma are diagnosed in the United States each year. Untreated BCCs can become locally invasive, grow wide and deep into the skin and destroy skin, tissue and bone.

The most common treatment for basal cell carcinoma in the United States is surgical removal. Surgery is the standard treatment for most BCC patients, either standard excision or Mohs Micrographic surgery. The treatment of basal cell carcinoma by a surgical procedure can result in high costs and clearly visible scarring.

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common cancer in humans, with an estimated annual incidence in the United States of 5.4 million cases (American Cancer Society). BCC arises from the basal cells in the epidermis and is associated with both chronic and intermittent acute UV exposure. The development of basal cell carcinoma is thought to be attributable, in part, to a deregulation of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. The Hedgehog pathway is involved in stem cell maintenance, regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation, and carcinogenesis. Unregulated activation has been implicated in the development of multiple cancers, including BCC (Gupta et. al. 2010). Chemotherapeutic inhibition of Hedgehog signaling has been demonstrated to be effective against advanced BCC (Soura et. al. 2015).

The current standard of care for localized BCC is surgical, either via standard excision or Mohs micrographic surgery; but it carries risks, including bleeding, scarring, and infection. Surgical treatment may not be desirable or indicated for all patients, resulting in a demand for more non-surgical treatment options.

Commonly used topical treatments for BCC currently include: imiquimod; 5-fluorouracil; and tazarotene.

Imiquimod works primarily by acting as an agonist of toll-like receptors 7 and 8 (Schon and Schon, 2007) leading to activation of nuclear factor-kappa B. This activation results in the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, ultimately resulting in a T-cell-mediated anti-tumor immune response (Schon and Schon, 2007). Imiquimod has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of both superficial and nodular BCC; however, imiquimod's efficacy is significantly inferior to surgery, with 84% of imiquimod-treated patients remaining tumor-free after 3-years, compared to 98% of surgically treated patients (Bath-Hextall et. al. 2014).

5-Fluorouracil is an antimetabolite that blocks DNA replication by inhibiting thymidylate synthase (Nakamura et. al. 2014). Three-year tumor-free status following treatment with fluorouracil is poorer than with imiquimod, with 68% of patients remaining tumor-free after 3-years (Roozeboom et. al. 2016).

Tazarotene's mechanism-of-action as an anti-neoplastic agent is not fully understood, but it is believed to be related to its ability to cause caspase-dependent apoptosis (Wu et. al. 2014). Tazarotene is a less-promising non-surgical alternative, with only 30.5% of patients remaining tumor-free at 3 years (Bianchi et. al. 2004).

Regulatory Environment

The production and manufacture of the Product and its research and development activities are subject to regulation for safety, efficacy and ethics by various governmental authorities in the United States. Although the present plan is to focus research and development in the United States, we might in the future expand into Canada and the European Union, in which case our activities will also be governed by regulatory authorities in these jurisdictions. These authorities, in the United States, Canada and the rest of the world, regulate research, development, testing, manufacturing, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution, marketing and import/export of pharmaceutical products, among other things. In the United States drugs and biological products are subject to regulation by the FDA and in the European Union activities are regulated by the applicable competent authority within each individual country and by the European Medicines Agency. In Canada, these activities are primarily regulated by the Food and Drug Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, which are enforced by the Therapeutic Products Directorate of Health Canada.

Drug approval laws in the Unites States, Canada and Europe generally require licensing of manufacturing facilities, carefully controlled research and testing of products, government review and approval of results prior to marketing and sale of drugs and drug delivery products. In addition, they require adherence to best practices as defined by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, as well as national guidelines. The process for pharmaceutical development and approval are subject to inherent risks, described in "Risk Factors."

The principal steps generally required for approval of drug and drug delivery products in the United States, Canada and Europe are described below.

Preclinical Toxicology Studies

Preclinical studies are conducted in vitro and in animals to evaluate toxicokinetics and pharmacokinetics to provide evidence of the safety and bioavailability of the product prior to its administration to humans in clinical studies and throughout development. Such studies compliant with FDA guidelines have been completed.

Human Testing

The process of conducting clinical trials with a new drug product generally cannot begin until a company has submitted to the appropriate regulatory authorities an application to do so and the required number of days have lapsed without objection from the applicable regulatory authority. (In certain jurisdictions, a no objection letter or approval may be required before the clinical trial can proceed). In the United States, this application is called an investigational new drug study, or "IND", and in Canada and most European countries, a clinical trial application, or "CTA."

For the United States, the sponsor of the study must submit the results of the non-clinical tests, manufacturing information, analytical data and available clinical data or literature, within the IND, to the FDA. Some information may be omitted from the IND in instances where prior FDA findings of safety or efficacy of a drug product are being relied upon. Even once the IND is submitted, non-clinical testing may continue to occur. An IND becomes effective automatically 30 days after receipt of the document by the FDA, unless within that time the FDA raises concerns or questions, in which case a clinical hold may be put in place until the concerns are adequately addressed by the study sponsor with the FDA.

Two key factors influencing the rate of progression of clinical trials are the rate at which patients can be enrolled to participate in the research program and whether effective treatments are currently available for the disease that the drug is intended to treat. Patient enrollment is largely dependent upon the incidence and severity of the disease, the treatments available and the potential side effects of the drug to be tested and any restrictions for enrolment that may be imposed by regulatory agencies. For further information see "Risk Factors."

Phase 1 Clinical Trials

Phase 1 clinical trials are typically conducted, on a small number of individuals (healthy volunteers or patients), to determine safety, dose limiting toxicities, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and to determine dose ranging for Phase 2 clinical trials in humans.

Phase 2 Clinical Trials

Phase 2 clinical trials typically involve a larger patient population than is required for Phase 1 and are conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a drug candidate in patients having the disease for which the drug is indicated. This phase also serves to identify possible common short-term side effects and risks.

Phase 3 Clinical Trials

Phase 3 clinical trials typically involve tests in a much larger population of patients suffering from the targeted condition or disease. These studies involve controlled and/or uncontrolled testing in an expanded patient population (several hundred to several thousand patients) at geographically dispersed test sites to establish clinical safety and effectiveness. These trials also generate information from which the overall risk-benefit relationship relating to the drug can be determined.

Marketing Application

Upon successful completion of Phase 3 clinical trials, the sponsor company assembles all the non-clinical, clinical and manufacturing data and submits a marketing application to the applicable regulatory authority for their review in order to obtain approval to sell the drug.

Before the applicable regulatory authority approves the marketing application, they will initiate an inspection of the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured. Products will not be approved unless there is compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices, or "GMP." Approval will occur if the inspection is satisfactory and the marketing application contains data that provides substantial evidence that the drug is safe and effective in the studied indication. In addition to manufacturing inspections, the regulatory authority will typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with Good Clinical Practices.

The testing and approval process for a new drug candidate requires substantial time, effort and financial resources, and may take several years to complete. Data obtained from non-clinical and clinical testing are not always conclusive and may be susceptible to varying interpretations, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Approval may not be granted on a timely basis, or at all.

Even if a regulatory authority approves a product candidate, the relevant authority may limit the approved indications for use, require specific contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product label, including a black box warning, require that post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, be conducted to further assess a drug's safety after approval, require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the product after commercialization, or impose other conditions, including distribution restrictions or other risk management mechanisms. For example, the FDA may require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy ("REMS"), (also known as a Risk Management Plan ("RMP") in Europe) as a condition of, or following, approval to mitigate any identified or suspected serious risks and ensure safe use of the drug. The REMS or RMP could include medication guides, physician communication plans, assessment plans, and elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries or other risk minimization tools. A REMS or RMP could materially affect the potential market and profitability of the product. A regulatory authority may prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the results of post-marketing studies or surveillance programs. After approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes, and additional label claims, are subject to further testing requirements, notification, and regulatory authority review and approval. Further, should new safety information arise, additional testing, product labeling or regulatory notification may be required.

Regulation of Combination Products in the United States

Certain products may be comprised of components, such as drug components and device components that would normally be subject to different regulatory frameworks by the FDA and frequently regulated by different centers at the FDA. These products are known as combination products. Under the FDCA, the FDA is charged with assigning a center with primary jurisdiction, or a lead center, for review of a combination product. The determination of which center will be the lead center is based on the "primary mode of action" of the combination product. Thus, if the primary mode of action of a drug-device combination product is attributable to the drug product, the FDA center responsible for premarket review of the drug product would have primary jurisdiction for the combination product. The FDA has also established an Office of Combination Products to address issues surrounding combination products and provide more certainty to the regulatory review process. That office serves as a focal point for combination product issues for agency reviewers and industry. It is also responsible for developing guidance and regulations to clarify the regulation of combination products, and for assignment of the FDA center that has primary jurisdiction for review of combination products where the jurisdiction is unclear or in dispute.

A combination product with a primary mode of action attributable to the drug component generally would be reviewed and approved pursuant to the drug approval processes set forth in the FDCA. In reviewing the new drug application for such a product, however, FDA reviewers could consult with their counterparts in the device center to ensure that the device component of the combination product met applicable requirements regarding safety, effectiveness, durability and performance. In addition, under FDA regulations, combination products are subject to current GMP requirements applicable to both drugs and devices, including the Quality System Regulations applicable to medical devices.

Healthcare Laws and Regulations

Coverage and Reimbursement

In the United States, Canada, and markets in other countries, patients who are prescribed treatments for their conditions and providers performing the prescribed services generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs. Thus, even if a product candidate is approved, sales of the product will depend, in part, on the extent to which third-party payors, including government health programs in the United States such as Medicare and Medicaid, commercial health insurers and managed care organizations, provide coverage, and establish adequate reimbursement levels for, the product. In the United States, no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for drug products exists among third-party payors. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for drug products can differ significantly from payor to payor. The process for determining whether a third-party payor will provide coverage for a product may be separate from the process for setting the price or reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product once coverage is approved. Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged, examining the medical necessity, and reviewing the cost-effectiveness of medical products and services and imposing controls to manage costs. Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific products on an approved list, also known as a formulary, which might not include all of the approved products for a particular indication.

In the United States, Medicare tends to have a greater role than private insurers in determining reimbursement for the treatment of conditions, such as basal cell cancer, that disproportionately affect patients over the age of 65.

Applicable Laws in the United States

If we obtain FDA approval for the Product and begin commercializing the Product in the United States, our operations may be directly, or indirectly through our future potential customers and third-party payors, subject to various federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act ("FCA"), and data privacy and physician sunshine laws and regulations. These laws or their relevant foreign counterparts may impact, among other things, our proposed sales, marketing, and education programs and its relationships with healthcare providers, physicians and other parties through which we market, sell and distribute its products for which it obtains marketing approval. In addition, we may be subject to patient privacy regulation by the federal government and the states in the United States as well as other jurisdictions. The laws that may affect our ability to operate include:

• the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the referral of an individual, or the purchase, lease, order, arrangement, or recommendation of any good, facility, item or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. A person or entity can be found guilty of violating the statute without actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it. The term remuneration has been interpreted broadly to include anything of value. Further, courts have found that if "one purpose" of remuneration is to induce referrals, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute is violated. Violations are subject to significant civil and criminal fines and penalties for each violation, plus up to three times the remuneration involved, imprisonment, and exclusion from government healthcare programs. In addition, a claim submitted for payment to any federal healthcare program that includes items or services that were made as a result of a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the FCA. The Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand and prescribers, purchasers, and formulary managers, among others, on the other. There are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution;

• the federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the FCA, and civil monetary penalty laws which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, false, fictitious or fraudulent claims for payment to, or approval by Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal healthcare programs; knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false, fictitious or fraudulent claim or an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government; or knowingly concealing or knowingly and improperly avoiding, decreasing or concealing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. A claim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim under the FCA. Manufacturers can be held liable under the FCA even when they do not submit claims directly to government payors if they are deemed to "cause" the submission of false or fraudulent claims. The FCA also permits a private individual acting as a "whistleblower" to bring qui tam actions on behalf of the federal government alleging violations of the FCA and to share in any monetary recovery or settlement. When an entity is determined to have violated the FCA, the government may impose civil fines and penalties for each false claim, plus treble damages, and exclude the entity from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs;

• the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA") which created additional federal criminal statutes that prohibit knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors, or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private), and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation, or making or using any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services relating to healthcare matters. Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity can be found guilty of violating HIPAA fraud provisions without actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it;

• HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or "HITECH", and their respective implementing regulations, which impose, among other things, certain requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information on certain covered healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses, known as covered entities, as well as their respective "business associates," those independent contractors or agents of covered entities that create, receive, maintain, transmit or obtain protected health information in connection with providing a service on behalf of a covered entity. HITECH also created new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys' fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In addition, there may be additional federal, state and non-U.S. laws, including but not limited to: (i) General Data Protection Regulation (European Union); (ii) the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (Canada); and (iii) Personal Information Protection Act (Canada), which govern the privacy and security of health and other personal information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts;

• the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act, created under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, and its implementing regulations, which require manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS"), information related to direct or indirect payments and other transfers of value made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors) and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by the physicians and their immediate family members. Effective January 1, 2022, these reporting obligations will extend to include transfers of value made in the previous year to certain non-physician providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners;

• federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers; and

• analogous U.S. state, local and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including private insurers and may be broader in scope than their federal equivalents; state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry's voluntary compliance guidelines and other relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; state and foreign laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers, marketing expenditures or drug pricing; state and local laws that require the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives; and state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of health information, some of which may be more stringent than those in the United States (such as the European Union, which adopted the General Data Protection Regulation, which became effective in May 2018) in certain circumstances, and may differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.

Healthcare Reform

The containment of healthcare costs has become a priority of federal, state and foreign governments, and the prices of products have been a focus in this effort. Governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could further limit a company's revenue generated from the sale of any approved products. Coverage policies and third-party payor reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which a company or its collaborators receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.

There have been a number of proposals during the last few years regarding the pricing of pharmaceutical products, limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for drugs and other medical products, government control and other changes to the healthcare system in the United States. For example, in March 2010, the U.S. Congress enacted the ACA, which, among other things, includes contains to the coverage and payment for products under government health care programs. Since its enactment, there have been numerous judicial, administrative, executive, and legislative challenges to certain aspects of the ACA, and there are likely to be additional challenges and amendments to the ACA in the future. For example, various portions of the ACA are currently undergoing legal and constitutional challenges in the U.S. Supreme Court. Additionally, the former Trump administration has issued various Executive Orders which eliminated cost sharing subsidies and various provisions that would impose a fiscal burden on states or a cost, fee, tax, penalty or regulatory burden on individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices and Congress has introduced several pieces of legislation aimed at significantly revising or repealing the ACA.

Moreover, payment methodologies may be subject to changes in healthcare legislation and regulatory150 initiatives. For example, CMS may develop new payment and delivery models, such as bundled payment models. Recently, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their products. Such scrutiny has resulted in several recent U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs under Medicare, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs. Several regulations have also been proposed partly in response to several executive orders issued by President Trump related to prescription drug pricing that seek to implement several of the administration's proposals. While some of these and other measures may require additional authorization to become effective, and the current Biden administration may reverse or otherwise change these measures, Congress has indicated that it will continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug costs.

The Microneedle Array Solution and Doxorubicin Hydrochloride

Why Doxorubicin Hydrochloride

The binding of doxorubicin to cellular membranes may affect a variety of cellular functions. Enzymatic electron reduction of doxorubicin by a variety of oxidases, reductases and dehydrogenases generates highly reactive species including the hydroxyl free radical (• OH). Cells treated with doxorubicin have been shown to manifest the characteristic morphologic changes associated with apoptosis or programmed cell death. Doxorubicin-induced apoptosis may be an integral component of the cellular mechanism of action relating to therapeutic effects, toxicities, or both. Doxorubicin is a particularly well-suited chemotherapeutic drug for the chemo-immunization strategy, because it creates an immunogenic "good death" for tumor cells (Galluzzi et. al. 2012) and (Storkus and Falo Jr 2007). As shown in the figure below, doxorubicin chemotherapy has been shown to result in innate immune activation, including the attraction and activation of antigen presenting cells, and a cell death process that facilitates the activation of antigen presenting cells and their internalization and processing of dying tumor cell derivatives through underlying mechanisms that include ATP and HMGB1 release, and calreticulin exposure (Zitvogel et al 2010 and Obeid et. al.) 2007). The doxorubicin-containing microneedle arrays ("D-MNA") in development by us utilizes this immunogenic apoptosis by applying very low doses of doxorubicin via the D-MNA to basal cell lesions. Doxorubicin is not currently approved for the treatment of BCC.

Utility of Microneedle Arrays to Deliver Doxorubicin to Basal Cell Lesions

The D-MNA is a dissolvable, tip-loaded 15 x 15 mm microneedle array delivering doxorubicin to the tumor microenvironment for non-melanoma skin cancer therapy. The arrays are "pressed" into the skin where an appropriate-size lesion is growing and left on the lesion site for up to 30 minutes, allowing the microneedles to penetrate the skin, dissolve, and deliver defined quantities of doxorubicin to the lesion. The micro-needle array's main excipient is buffered carboxymethyl cellulose. Doses of 25 µg, 50 µg, 100 µg, or 200 µg of doxorubicin hydrochloride can be contained in the array's 400 microneedles. A placebo array without doxorubicin hydrochloride but alike in every other respect ("P-MNA") has been fabricated for clinical testing and "blanks" for analytical testing.

The goal of our program is to demonstrate the D-MNA as a more robust alternative to the currently available non-surgical, and in many cases, surgical treatments for BCC.

Preclinical Proof of Efficacy Studies

The program's therapeutic strategy relies on highly localized delivery of doxorubicin to the topically accessible tumor microenvironment. Doxorubicin delivered by the MNAs described in University of Pittsburgh's IND #122448 had shown efficacy in causing local, acute tumor cell death in the mouse melanoma model at doses that would otherwise be considered safe (e.g., 25 µg), but sub-therapeutic if delivered via a systemic route of administration. A typical systemic dose of doxorubicin is 60-75 micrograms/m² and a typical adult cancer patient is 1.73 m², resulting in a dose of 104 to 130 milligrams (approximately 4,000 times higher than the 25 µg delivered by the MNA).

MNAs delivering doxorubicin also demonstrated efficacy in a murine squamous cell carcinoma model, with 100% survival in MNA-Doxorubicin group versus 0% survival in MNA-Blank group (Friedman B, et al, 2017). Survival advantage persisted with 40% of MNA-Doxorubicin-treated mice alive at 40 days post-inoculation. As a result, we believe BCC is a rational target for chemo-immunotherapy using D-MNAs.

The University of Pittsburgh research under IND #122448 was conducted on mice in groups ranging in size from six mice to 45 mice using the same D-MNAs that we are developing. These studies were not powered to demonstrate statistical significance.

Manufacturing Processes and Critical to Quality Parameters

Overview

For BCC, the principal mode of action of the D-MNA depends on doxorubicin being delivered to this basal layer space, disrupting the affected basal cells, and recruiting immune cells to eradicate the lesion. The 400 microneedles in the D-MNA must therefore be durable enough to penetrate the stratum corneum and upper layers of the epidermis, but also dissolve quickly enough to deliver sufficient doxorubicin to the site during the 30 minute application. Other more traditional parameters of biopharmaceutics also apply, such as consistency of dose between arrays, made more complex than oral or other dosage forms, by the molding and centrifugation process for the arrays. The important biopharmaceutic considerations for the efficacy of the array therefore include the following:

•              Fidelity of dose to label claim

•              Needle strength/hardness

•              Homogeneous distribution of drug throughout the array

•              Consistency of dose between arrays

•              Dissolution of the microneedles sufficient to deliver the drug payload

These factors can affect the ability of a dissolvable, tip-loaded microneedle array to perform as expected in human clinical studies. We have taken the following steps to ensure these factors are properly controlled during manufacturing.

Factors Affecting Ability of MNA to Perform Clinically

MNA = dissolvable microneedle array, HPLC = high power liquid chromatography, UV = ultra-violet, CMC = carboxymethyl cellulose.

Manufacturers of D-MNA Components

Composition of the Drug Product

Each array contains 400 microneedles with a total tip volume of 9.6 µL which are evenly filled with 9.6 µL of doxorubicin gel of the following composition. The doses in the headline refer to the base of doxorubicin. The current formulation contains an overage of 5% of drug substance.

Controls of Critical Steps and Intermediates

The following are fundamental to the production of arrays according to GFE Protocol P171016-1-R3.

• Preparation: Assembly and gel formulation.

• Deposition 1 (Tip Loading): Deposition of the formulation containing active doxorubicin and excipients.

• Deposition 2 (Backing Plate): Deposition of formulation containing only excipients to create the backing plate to the needle structure.

• Drying: Centrifugation of the array under controlled temperature and humidity conditions until moisture is removed from the formulation.

• Demolding, Cutting, Desiccation, and Storage: Removal of the arrays from the molds, trimming, and storage in a desiccator box in a controlled refrigerated environment for 72-96 hours.

Critical to quality parameters include:

• Dissolution and homogeneity of all materials during mixing.

• Centrifuge rpm and quality/degree of tip loading.

• Dilution and viscosity of gels relating to accurate, consistent deposition.

• Duration and speed of drying steps affecting water content and flatness of arrays.

• Temperature maintained (2-8 C) within centrifuge with impact on drying time and on doxorubicin stability.

• Refrigeration of arrays once fabricated.

• Post-fabrication, moisture content of arrays reduced to 5%, as measured by loss on drying.

In-Process Controls: D-MNA; P-MNA

The flow chart, below, describes in more detail the critical steps and manufacturing parameters. A summary narrative of the process is provided on subsequent pages.

Figure 1. Manufacturing flow chart

Manufacturing Process Equipment

The equipment used to fabricate the arrays is listed in the table below:

Equipment Used to Fabricate Arrays

In an initial step, a master mold is fabricated by a milling process under CAD/CAM of a suitable material such as an acrylic or a metal alloy, rendering the required geometry for the microneedles. Once fabricated, the master mold is stored for future rendering of production molds as needed. The masters are wrapped in a clean-room towel for protection and stored in individually labeled rigid containers. The production molds are stored 4 per glass container labeled with revision codes. All materials are stored in a final secondary container labeled masters and production molds.

The master mold is then used to fabricate the production molds from polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS; (Slygard® 184, Dow Corning) (B)). This latter material is poured onto the master mold, positioned, and spun in the same centrifuge used to fabricate the arrays such that the forces and angles used to make the production mold mirror those used to fabricate, ultimately, the arrays. The production molds are inspected after every production cycle to ensure integrity of the needle forms. Protocol P171016-3 governs the process by which each production mold is cleaned of any material from a previous production run.

1. Preparation

The Lynx square tool holder assembly is disassembled into the components and all components are cleaned thoroughly with isopropyl alcohol. This includes the "square" bucket tool holder (black), the casting sleeves (white), and the leveling plates (green).

The square tool holder assembly is then reassembled. Each position in each holder is engraved with a number and letter. The number refers to the tool holder and the letter the position within the bucket. The cast leveling plates have similar markings and should align. Note the direction of arrow which identifies the spin direction of the centrifuge and orientation of the leveling plate.

The production molds and the mold masks, if used, should be sonicated in deionized water within an ultrasonic cleaner for 30 minutes at 35C and dried for 24 hours prior to use.

Pre-assemble the production molds by aligning the exterior step and pressing into the production mold.

The production mold is placed in the square tool holder assembly and pressed into the levelling plate. There is no orientation of the production mold.

The square tool holder is used for placement of completed assemblies into the buckets within the centrifuge and run at 2,000 rpm for 30 seconds. The purpose of this is to "seat" all components within the mold and levelling plate to a "home" position.

	The covered buckets are centrifuged for a short period of time to "set" the doxorubicin gel into the needle tips. Deposition #1 is complete: the doxorubicin gel has been molded into the microneedles. Upon completion of this step, the square tool holder assembly is removed from the centrifuge buckets. (Figure 3).
	A square edge spatula is then used to remove the excess formulation on the production mold. This removes most of the excess formulation (Figure 4). The square bucket tool holder assembly is placed in the centrifuge buckets, covered with biosafe HC caps and gaskets. These are centrifuged for 30 minutes at 5,500 rpm at 15°C. This step assures that the formulation is pushed as deeply into the tips as possible and to promote drying, allowing space for the backing plate material to be deposited, overlaying the microneedles

3. Deposition #2 (Backing "Plate" to each D-MNA)

After the full drying cycle of 30 minutes finishes, the bucket tool holder assembly is removed from the centrifuge buckets. Next, the placebo formulation, 0.25 mL per array, is deposited in each array cavity (10 cavities per production mold). The material is deposited as evenly as possible.

The square tool holder assembly is placed back into the centrifuge buckets and covered with biosafe lids with gaskets. The centrifuge is run for 30 minutes at 5,500 rpms at 20°C. Upon completion of the centrifugation, the caps are removed from the buckets.

4. Drying

Figure 6. Left, the "cubes" holding each array (foil seal not shown); 
center, 2" x 3" packets holding the cubes; right, ziplock bag holding 4 packets of arrays

Four 2" x 3" packets are then stored in a Ziplock Uline 4" x 6" bag, which contains D-MNA's of the same dosage (25 µg, 50 µg, 100 µg, or 200 µg, or placebo). The outer Uline bag is sealed with a serialized security tape and carries standard investigation drug labeling (Figure 7) including a supplemental label containing the subject number.

When the packaging of the entire production run (consisting typically of 200-240 arrays) has been completed, the product is then shipped on ice pack for the next phase, namely, sterilization, quality control testing, and release of the product.

Release Testing and Release of Product

The release of GMP-quality product to a clinical site is a highly regulated practice. Upon shipping of the arrays form GFE, LLC, the array manufacturer, which has already performed its own quality control, the entire shipment of arrays embarks on a multistage process, whose end goal is release of the investigational product to the clinical site (Figure 8).

Because the arrays are breaking the skin surface of human subjects, the FDA views the arrays as a type of parenteral product and therefore requires sterilization. On the day of completing the packaging of the arrays, GFE ships the fully packaged arrays by overnight courier to Ebeam Services who performs electron beam sterilization of the arrays. The arrays are then transported by a same-day courier service from Ebeam Services to Intertek Pharmaceutical Services ("Intertek"), who performs four functions:

1) places the majority of the arrays in stability storage;

2) ships a designated number of arrays to Nelson Laboratories for endotoxin and bioburden testing;

3) initiates analytical and other testing of the arrays within Intertek; and

4) ships a designated number of the arrays to Clinigen on quarantine for distribution to the clinical sites when the arrays have passed quality control/quality assurance.

Figure 9 indicates the types of tests performed for release of the product.

Figure 9. Certificate of Analysis qualifying the release of microneedle arrays

The essential settings for the phase appropriate, GMP-validated HPLC method for identity, assay/purity, related substances, and content uniformity testing performed by Intertek are provided below.

While Intertek is performing this testing, Nelson Laboratories is performing the following work to assess microbiological safety:

● Endotoxin testing: The Bacterial Endotoxin Test, or Lumulus Amebocyte Lysate ("LAL") Test, quantifies endotoxins that are part of the cell wall of gram-negative bacteria. LAL testing is performed on samples at T0 and subsequent stability timepoints.

● Sterility/bioburden: The arrays are also dissolved and the contents are cultured to determine if the sterilization eradicated all bacteria and yeasts from the samples. This test is performed on samples at T0 and subsequent stability timepoints.

All of the results of these tests and others such as moisture content and physical assessment are then collated and appended to a certificate of analysis ("COA"), which, when signed by qualified persons, allows the release of the product by Clinigen Clinical Services, who has stored the product under quarantine until they receive the signed COA authorizing release to the clinical site.

Preclinical Development of D-MNA

Preclinical Test Material

GMP-quality doxorubicin was used for all preclinical studies (murine local lymph node assay, rabbit irritation and pyrogenicity study, and Yucatan minipig local tolerance study). The nonclinical arrays were produced under non-GMP conditions; GMP conditions were not required for these studies. The manufacturing methods used to make the arrays for the non-clinical studies are identical to the methods used to make the GMP-quality arrays.

Preclinical PK and Safety Studies

The results of the preclinical studies indicate a reliable lack of systemic exposure when doxorubicin is delivered via MNA. Furthermore, minipig studies using doses of up to 200 µg per MNA showed no detectable levels of doxorubicin, measured by LC-MS/MS. Given these data, no systemic effects are anticipated from D-MNA application.

All preclinical studies of D-MNA were conducted by the University of Pittsburgh at the laboratory of Dr. Louis Falo.

University of Pittsburgh Experience

Doxorubicin delivered by the MNAs described in University of Pittsburgh's IND #122448 showed efficacy in causing local, acute tumor cell death in the mouse melanoma model at doses that would otherwise be considered safe (e.g., 25 µg), but sub-therapeutic if delivered via a systemic route of administration. A typical systemic dose of doxorubicin is 60-75 micrograms/m2 and a typical adult cancer patient is 1.73 m2, resulting in a dose of 104 to 130 milligrams (approximately 4,000 times higher than the 25 µg delivered by the MNA).

MNAs delivering doxorubicin also demonstrated efficacy in a murine squamous cell carcinoma model, with 100% survival in MNA-Doxorubicin group versus 0% survival in MNA-Blank group (Friedman B, et al, 2017). Survival advantage persisted with 40% of MNA-Doxorubicin-treated mice alive at 40 days post-inoculation. As a result, we believe BCC is a rational target for chemo-immunotherapy using D-MNAs.

The University of Pittsburgh research under IND #122448 was conducted on mice in groups ranging in size from six mice to 45 mice using the same D-MNAs that we are developing. These studies were not powered to demonstrate statistical significance.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics and Product Metabolism in Non-Human Animals

As shown by the data and Figure 10 below (courtesy of Louis Falo, M.D., Ph.D.), blood samples were collected from mice intravenously injected with 100 µg or 200 µg of doxorubicin or from mice receiving 200 µg D-MNA, after 5, 20, and 60 minutes. Doxorubicin content of the blood samples was measured by spectrofluorimetry and quantitated against a calibration curve. No detectable quantities of doxorubicin were observed in the mice receiving the 200 µg D-MNA; doxorubicin levels were detectable in the intravenously injected mice.

Figure 10

In addition, Medicus obtained pharmacokinetic data during the Yucatan minipig local tolerance study (Study No. S15055). A total of 30 minipigs (15 males and 15 females) were randomized into five treatment groups. Groups of 3 males and 3 females were treated with a blank control array (Group 1), and three dose levels of D-MNA at 25, 50 and 200 µg/dose of doxorubicin hydrochloride (Groups 2 - 4), respectively. An intravenous ("IV") doxorubicin group consisting of 3 males and 3 females served as a reference control (Group 5). Dosing occurred on Days 1, 7 and 14 with either control array or test article (Groups 1-4), and Group 5 was dosed IV on these same study days. Each topical treatment was 30 minutes. The experimental design is provided in the table below.

Study Design of Minipig Local Tolerance Study

Note:

(1) Dosing volume for Group 5 was 1 ml/kg (doxorubicin hydrocholoride 2 mg/ml). NA = Not Applicable IV = Intravenous

Blood collections for toxicokinetic evaluation were conducted on Days 1 and 14 post dose administration (post-30 mins application for Groups 1-4) for all groups.

Excluding the group 5 control group, all array-treated groups showed doxorubicin plasma levels below the lower limit of quantitation ("LLOQ"), which for this LC-MS/MS method was 0.25 ng/ml. The study sponsor concluded that in the minipig model there was no measurable systemic exposure to doxorubicin when administered by the Sponsor's tip-loaded, dissolvable microneedle array.

Based on the mice and minipig pharmacokinetic data, we concluded that human systemic exposure to doxorubicin is unlikely through the application of the D-MNA.

Analytical Methods and Validation

A bioanalytical method was validated for the determination of doxorubicin in Yucatan minipig plasma ("K2EDTA") by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry ("LC-MS/MS") at a dynamic range of 0.250 - 50.0 ng/ml. The analyte is light sensitive and exposure to direct light was minimized during extraction and analysis. Doxorubicin-13C,d3 was used as the internal standard.

A summary of the validation data for the analyte is presented in the table below.

Summary of Validation Data from LC-MS/MS Study

The toxicity of doxorubicin hydrochloride has previously been evaluated and reported in standard preclinical toxicology models. More important, the toxicity profile of parenteral doxorubicin in humans at doses cytotoxic to cancers has been well established and recounted in the Investigator Brochure for D-MNA Patch (September 4, 2018).

We have not conducted any formal safety pharmacology studies. However, selected parameters that are typically collected in CNS and respiratory safety pharmacology were collected in the form of clinical observations in the below-listed toxicology studies. In addition, electrocardiograms were recorded in a pivotal toxicology study in minipigs and were evaluated by a board-certified veterinary cardiologist.

We have completed three GLP-compliant toxicology studies:

1. D-MNA toxicity, local tolerance and toxicokinetics study in Yucatan minipigs (Study No. S15055)

2. Local lymph node immunotoxicology assay ("LLNA") in CBA/J mice (Study No. BRT Study 20170724)

3. Pyrogenicity/skin irritation study in New Zealand White ("NZW") rabbits (Study No. Study No. S15054), each of which was preceded by a pilot study using the same species and strain of animal.

The D-MNA was designed to penetrate human skin and dissolve into a skin cancer. Given the inherent differences in skin types between mammalian species, the pilot studies were necessary to ensure that the GLP study would provide for a valid safety assessment.

In total, three pilot studies were performed. For the GLP minipig study (SRC Study No. S15055), a pilot study demonstrated that it was technically feasible to administer D-MNA to Yucatan minipigs (SRC Study No. S15200). For the LLNA (BRT Study No. 20170725), the site of dosing is always the mouse's ears. It was immediately obvious that a novel approach would be needed since the D-MNA measures approximately 1.5 x 1.5 cm, as large or larger than the ears themselves. The study sponsor developed a liquid test article containing all the ingredients of the D-MNA with added DMSO, an approved LLNA solvent which helps the test article to penetrate the skin of the mouse ear. The pilot study demonstrated that this test article was non-irritating, and therefore, should perform a valid assessment of D-MNA's sensitization potential (BRT Study No. 20170724).

For the GLP rabbit study (SRC Study No. S15054), the pilot study demonstrated that the rabbit was not a valid model for testing D-MNA due to the lack of underlying musculoskeletal support which allows for the technician to apply pressure to the D-MNA during administration (SRC Study No. S15198). In addition, the presence of tightly spaced hair follicles appeared to at least partially inhibit penetration of the needles on the D-MNA. Accordingly, the Sponsor determined that a subcutaneous injection of modified D-MNA gel, with extra buffer added to make the D-MNA formulation syringeable, would provide a valid assessment of pyrogenicity. This same formulation was also used to test for skin irritation on abraded skin.

The data in the table below describe the results of studies conducted by SkinJect to elucidate the effects of delivering the gel used to make the array or the array itself to the skin.

Summary of Toxicology Studies (Phase 1 Study)

Murine Local Lymph Node Assay

The purpose of this study (BRT Study No. 20170725) was to evaluate the sensitization potential of doxorubicin, the active component of D-MNA, when applied at 4 concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200 µg) to both mouse ears, once daily for 3 consecutive days, in the LLNA.

There were no clinical observations or signs of erythema in the vehicle group or in test article-treated animals. No meaningful body weight loss was observed in any of the control or treatment groups.

Treatment-group mean ear thickness values did not increase by 25% or more at any tested concentration of the test or control articles. Thus, primary irritation would not be expected to have affected the LLNA stimulation indices.

It was not possible to calculate a threshold positive response (EC3 potency) in the current study since all test article stimulation index values were below 3, thus, the test article containing D-MNA constituents (doxorubicin in DMSO, CMC and excipients) was not considered a sensitizer under the conditions of this study.

Irritation and Pyrogenicity Study in the New Zealand Rabbit

Experience in a pilot trial (SRC Study No. S15198) using this rabbit species with the dissolvable, tip-loaded microneedle array of doxorubicin indicated that the microneedle array was not suitable for the NZW rabbits.

Consequently, SkinJect decided to test the pre-molding array formulation, i.e., the gel consisting of doxorubicin, carboxy methylcellulose, trehalose, citric acid, dibasic sodium phosphate, and deionized water, on the New Zealand rabbit in this GLP study (SRC Study No. S15054). This approach provided a method for testing all gel components for their pyrogenic and irritation potential. The objective of this study was to evaluate the test article (doxorubicin and excipients) for pyrogenicity following subcutaneous (SQ) injection, and for local skin irritation potential after topical dose administration of various dose concentrations on NZW rabbits.

A total of 15 male NZW rabbits were randomized into one of five treatment groups, including a vehicle control (Group 1), three dose levels of test article (Groups 2-4), and a reference control (Group 5). This study was conducted in two phases as follows:

Pyrogenicity Phase: Pyrogenicity of the test article was evaluated at dose levels of 50, 100 and 200 μg (0.3 ml/animal). On dosing phase Day 1, the vehicle or test article formulations were administered via SQ injection to the scapular area of each animal (Groups 1-4). Group 5 animals were intravenously administered lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 0.01μg/ml) at 0.04 ml/kg and 4 ml/kg within ~4 hours. Body temperatures were recorded at baseline, and at ~30-minute intervals for the first 4 hours post-dose, and at 8 and 24 hours post-dose administration.

All animals had a normal body temperature (99.2-103.4 ºF/37.3-39.7 ºC) at baseline. After dose administration, all vehicle control and test animals body temperature appeared normal (ranged from 99.1 ºF/37.3 ºC to 103.9 ºF/39.9 ºC) within the observation period up to 24 hours, except for two measurements at 8 hour respectively for one vehicle animal (104.1°F /40.1°C) and one high dose animal (104.9°F /40.5°C). These two measurements were slightly above the normal range and considered an incidental finding. For the reference control (Group 5), animal body temperatures were above normal (104.8-107.7°F/40.4-42.1°C) for all animals during the first 4 hours after intravenously administered lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 0.01μg/ml) at 0.04 μg/kg.

Dermal Irritation Phase: Groups 1-4, all animals were dosed topically via 2 filter paper patches (2.5 cm x 2.5 cm) on naïve dorsal skin sites with a saline control patch (saturated with ~0.2 ml saline) and a 0.3 ml of vehicle (Group 1) or test formulation (Groups 2-4, 50, 100 or 200 μg/site) instilled patch. Prior to dosing, skin of all dose sites was abraded using adhesive tape. The patches were removed after 30 minutes. For the reference control (Group 5) animals, 2 saline control and 2 reference control patches (~0.2 ml/patch) were applied to the dose sites for 4 hours. Dose site skin was assessed at approximately 1, 4, 24 and 48 hours following patch removal for all groups.

All animals in groups 1 - 4 exhibited minimal-to-no dose-related erythema or edema. If erythema and edema were present, they were generally mild, with only a few observations of well-defined erythema. Severe skin irritation was observed on all the test sites (SLS) in group 5. These results demonstrate that the test article did not cause any pyrogenicity after subcutaneous injection or topical application at doses up to 200 μg/site.

14-Day Toxicity Study in the Yucatan Minipig

The objective of this study (SRC Study No. S15055) was to evaluate the local tissue tolerability, potential toxicity, skin irritation and systemic exposure after various dose levels delivered by D-MNA following three (3) topical dose administrations within two weeks on young Yucatan minipigs. The minipig data needs to be considered in the context of an unexpectedly high degree of dose variability. The variability in the minipig study was most likely the result of inconsistent delivery of doxorubicin from the microneedle array, possibly due to animal movement as the arrays were being applied.

Following an acclimation period, a total of 30 minipigs (15 males and 15 females) were randomized into one of five treatment groups. Groups of 3 males and 3 females were treated with a blank control array (Group 1), and three dose levels of D-MNA at 25, 50 and 200 µg/dose of doxorubicin (Groups 2 - 4), respectively. An IV DXR group, consisting of 3 males and 3 females, served as a reference control (Group 5). Dosing occurred on Days 1, 7 and 14 with either control array or test article (Groups 1-4), and Group 5 was dosed intravenously on these same study days. Each topical treatment lasted 30 minutes. Each animal receiving topical treatment (Groups 1 - 4) was observed for clinical signs and dose site reactions. Blood collections for toxicokinetic evaluation were conducted on Days 1 and 14 post dose administration (post-30 mins application for Groups 1-4) for all groups. Clinical pathology was conducted on all animals on Day 3 to look for acute effects, and again on Day 16 prior to necropsy. The animals were euthanized on Day 16 with designated tissues collection for histopathology. Study Day 1 corresponded to the first day of dose administration.

The histopathology findings showed that the D-MNA-treated animals exhibited no systemic effects and no organ toxicity. These findings are consistent with systemic exposure to doxorubicin being below the lower limit of quantitation.

Application of the D-MNAs to the minipig's skin produced several findings all related to cutaneous reactions. Test article-related macroscopic findings were present in the dose site (skin). Red discoloration of the epidermis of the dose site was identified in four animals, limited to Groups 3 and 4 (D-MNA mid and high dose, respectively). In two of the Group 4 female animals, the red discoloration correlated microscopically with serocellular crust, and additionally with dermis congestion in one of those animals. The other two animals (males) did not have a microscopic correlation. Abnormal surface (scabbing) of the epidermis of the dose site was observed in a Group 4 male animal and correlated microscopically with serocellular crust.

Hemorrhage of the right axillary region was observed in a single animal in Group 5 (intravenous Doxorubicin) and correlated microscopically to hemorrhage. It was believed to be related to blood collection or injection procedures.

Other macroscopic findings represented incidental background findings typical for this species, or else did not have a correlate.

Local cutaneous reactions were expected with application of the D-MNA to the minipig and similar reactions are likely to occur in human subjects receiving D-MNAs.

Clinical Development of D-MNA:

SkinJect Experience

Protocol SKNJCT-001 (Phase 1 Study)

Study Design: This study was designed as an open-label dose escalation trial of D-MNA in participants with BCC (subtype: superficial or nodular). The study followed a traditional 3+3 dose escalation design with 4 dose groups plus placebo to define a maximum tolerated dose ("MTD") by evaluating DLTs. Treatments consisted of one application administered weekly, three times over a two-week period. The goal of the dose escalation was to determine the MTD and assess lesion responses in the different dose groups to inform a decision on the doses to be tested in a subsequent Phase 2 study.

The study was composed of a screening visit, three treatment visits at one-week intervals over a two-week period, an end of treatment visit, and three follow-up visits. The total duration for study recruitment was completed in approximately five to seven months. Individual participant participation was approximately up to 11 weeks (four weeks screening + seven weeks from the first treatment to the final follow up visit).

Escalation followed a traditional 3+3 design. Specifically, in each dose group n=3 participants were treated. If no DLTs were observed, the study was escalated to the next dose level. If DLTs had been observed in 2 or more participants, then the MTD would have been exceeded. If one DLT had been observed, an additional three participants would have been added at the same dose level. If no DLTs had been observed in the additional three participants, the study would have escalated to the next dose level. If DLTs had been observed in one or more of the three additional participants, the MTD would have been exceeded. The first two dose groups, Placebo and 25 µg, screened and enrolled subjects concurrently in the study.

SkinJect hypothesized that treatment with D-MNA would result in tumor destruction and the induction of potent, immunogenic anti-tumor responses. Because MNAs enable this agent to be delivered at very low doses to a confined tumor microenvironment, the study sponsor expected only minimal, if any, systemic drug toxicity; thus, facilitating optimal local dose levels and durable clinical responses.

The study design also included a placebo group (placebo-MNA). Inclusion of placebo-MNA allowed the evaluation of two questions:

• Tolerability: to assess if there was a cutaneous response to microneedle penetration that was independent of microneedle delivery of doxorubicin to the target tissue.

• Efficacy: to assess if a placebo-containing array could stimulate a non-specific immune response in reaction to microneedle penetration of the skin, and compare to the response with the active compound doxorubicin delivered by the D-MNA.

In addition the clinical design also assessed the pre-established secondary efficacy endpoint described below.

• Secondary Endpoint: Lesion response as assessed by a central reader after the 3-week course of treatment to be categorized as either absence or presence of a complete response defined as no evidence of residual BCC in the resected specimen on histological examination.

Subject populations included adult males and females, 18+ years in general good health as assessed by the study's principal investigator. BCC (subtype: superficial or nodular) had to confirmed histologically by diagnostic shave biopsy at the screening visit. If previously confirmed, participants could only have diagnosed BCC via shave biopsy within 6 months of first study treatment. The disease had to be primary BCC (i.e., no previous treatment), and the lesion size was required to = 64 mm2 or 8 x 8 mm and = 169 mm2 or 13 x 13 mm, i.e., the entire lesion must be covered by 13 x 13 mm area of the array containing the microneedles. Laboratory values had to be within normal ranges.

Subjects were excluded from participation in this study if they had evidence of clinically significant, unstable medical conditions as assessed by the principal investigator; if they had an excisional biopsy performed on the lesion to be treated in this study; if they had recent therapy(ies) to the BCC treatment area; if they had recurrent BCC (previously treated) at the site presented for treatment; and if they previously demonstrated sensitivity to doxorubicin or carboxymethyl cellulose. Other reasons for exclusion included current active malignancies, metastatic disease, in other regions; pregnancy; and any other reason that the investigator deemed as prejudicial to the outcome of the study.

The investigational product is chemotherapeutic agent, doxorubicin (25 µg, 50 µg, 100 µg, or 200 µg) delivered to the basal layer of skin by a novel delivery system, a MNA. The delivery system is a square array 15 x 15 mm in dimension edge to edge. The dissolvable array of 400 microneedles is in a 13 x 13 mm area. The microneedles are 750 microns in length. Each MNA patch delivers 9.6 µL of drug product into the peri-epidermal space.

Conclusions: The Phase 1 study was designed as an open-label dose escalation trial of D-MNA in participants with BCC (subtype: superficial or nodular). The study followed a traditional 3+3 dose escalation design with 4 dose groups plus placebo to define a MTD by evaluating DLTs. Treatments consisted of one application administered weekly, three times over a two-week period. The goal of the dose escalation was to determine the MTD and assess lesion responses in the different dose groups to inform a decision on the doses to be tested in a subsequent Phase 2 study. Of the 13 subjects enrolled, all 13 subjects completed the study and were included in all analysis populations; no subjects discontinued the study prematurely. Most subjects (8 of 13) were male, all subjects were White, and all but one subject were Non-Hispanic/Latino. Age range across the 13 subjects was 31 to 94 years.

The primary study endpoint was the assessment of DLT through Visit 4 (21 days) as defined using the LSR grading scale. No subjects reached DLT at any treatment assessment.

At screening, both the site and central reader were in agreement for 7 of 13 subjects (5 were considered nodular and 2 superficial at screening); however, for 6 subjects, the site and central reader assessments differed. For one subject (01-014), the Central Reader found no BCC present in the screening biopsy. Consultants reviewing the study results stated that multiple reasons could possibly be attributable, including human error misreading at the site, confusion of BCC with certain benign follicular tumors, and the presence of BCCs with both nodular and superficial components.

At the end of study, three subjects (01-001, Placebo; 01-008, D-MNA 25 µg and 01-011, D-MNA 50 µg) had differing results when Local/Site evaluation were compared to the Central Reader evaluation. In all three subjects, the Local/Site evaluation noted the presence of residual BCC compared to the Central Reader results which noted no residual BCC for all three subjects. It should be noted that the central reader was blinded to study treatment. In addition, another contributing factor to the noted differences may have been related to different slices of the tumor being evaluated by each of the readers; the local/site reader had the tissue sample obtained at the time of the excision, whereas the Central Reader tissue samples were sliced from the same block for each subject and stained several months later; the slides used in the Local/Site evaluation were not available for reading by the Central Reader.

For the secondary endpoint of BCC clinical response, evaluations were performed both at the local/site level as well as independently by a central reader. For the local/site assessment, complete lesion response was observed in one subject each for Placebo, D-MNA 25 µg, D-MNA 100 µg, and D-MNA 200 µg. For D-MNA 50 µg, no subjects were observed to have CR. For the central reader assessment, histopathologic assessment showed six subjects (one Placebo, two D-MNA 25 µg, one D-MNA 50 µg, one D-MNA 100 µg, and one D-MNA 200 µg) with no residual BCC. A "complete response" was considered the absence of BCC in the final excision at 4 weeks. For the Placebo subject (001-003) although it was assessed as a clinical responder according to the local site assessment, the local PI noted a new squamous cell carcinoma in situ (but no residual basal cell carcinoma) that was also confirmed as squamous cell carcinoma by the Central Reader assessment of the end of study excision. Consultants stated that it could be difficult to tell by skin examination alone if there was residual BCC, and that a minority of subjects do not have any residual BCC after having had a biopsy (possibly due in part to local post-procedural inflammatory response).

For the exploratory endpoint of quantification of doxorubicin released by the MNAs, doxorubicin delivery was confirmed, but across all dose groups it was observed that there was inconsistent doxorubicin deposition by the MNAs.

For the secondary endpoint of local tolerance of the MNA, at post-MNA application, assessments indicated that subjects had mild to moderate erythema restricted to the treatment area, at each visit with each dose level, including placebo. Flaking/scaling was minimal and isolated to the lesions. Crusting was generally absent or isolated. Swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, and erosion/ulceration were absent. Based on the proposed mechanism of action, some erythema evidencing an inflammatory reaction at the site of D-MNA application was to be expected.

For the secondary endpoint of pain assessment, for most subjects, no pain was noted. Some subjects experienced mild or moderate pain, generally at Visit 2 or Visit 3. At the Visit 4 End of Treatment assessment, no pain was noted for any subject.

Only two subjects reported a total of three adverse events ("AEs") in this study. All three AEs were considered mild in severity, and only one was considered probably related to study treatment mild application site pain that resolved the same day; this AE was associated with a low pain assessment scale score (1) at Visit 3. No deaths, serious adverse events, or AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported. No clinically significant abnormal findings were observed with regard to laboratory parameters, vital signs, ECGs, and physical examinations.

The SKNJCT-001 study was designed to assess the safety of the D-MNA patch in patients with BCC. There were no serious adverse events nor any demonstrated alterations in any clinical measurements during the trial. The conclusion of the study was that D-MNA patch was well tolerated with no evidence of dose limiting toxicity.

The SKNJCT-001 study also had a pre-established secondary efficacy endpoint as described above.  Six of the 13 patients were categorized as complete response by the central reader.

As a result, the clinical study report concluded that SKNJCT-001 study met both its primary and secondary endpoints.

Protocol SKNJCT-002 (Suspended Phase 1/Phase 2 Study)

This study was written by SkinJect, Inc. prior to its acquisition by the Company and submitted as part of the IND. The FDA approved this protocol in 2021. It was designed as a two-part study. The first part involved the enrollment of 15 healthy volunteers and was designed to study the penetration of placebo-containing DMA patches at five different anatomic locations. After the first seven health volunteers were enrolled, due to the variability of array application observed by the investigator, SkinJect made the decision to pause the trial. The study was never resumed, and it was ultimately closed without further enrollment. There were no adverse events reported in the enrolled subjects.

Protocol SKNJCT-003 (Phase 2 Study)

Study Design: The clinical study, SKNJCT-003, is designed to be a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled (P-MNA), multi-center study enrolling up to 60 subjects presenting with nodular type BCC of the skin. The study will evaluate the efficacy of two dose levels of D-MNA compared to placebo in patients with nodular BCC. The participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to one of three groups: a placebo-controlled group receiving P-MNA, a low-dose group receiving 100μg of D-MNA, and a high-dose group receiving 200μg of D-MNA. The clinical design was submitted to the FDA in January 2024 to seek comments to revise and amend the IND and finalize the protocol. The FDA responded in March 2024 and requested additional clinical information. A final protocol was submitted to the FDA in July 2024, which included the information requested by the FDA, along with updated chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC), stability and sterility data. On July 31, 2024, the FDA responded to the latest submission and requested certain additional information and clarification. The Company has responded to the FDA on August 2, 2024. Beginning August 13, 2024, the Company commenced activating its clinical trial sites and participant recruitment is now underway. On December 2, 2024, the Company announced that the phase 2 clinical study (SKNJCT-003) was underway in nine clinical sites in the United States and that it had already randomized more than 25% of the 60 patients expected to be enrolled in the study. As of the date of this offering circular, the Company has activated nine clinical sites in the United States and has randomized more than 50% of the 60 patients expected to be enrolled in the study. In addition, the Company expects to complete an interim data analysis before the end of the first quarter of 2025 and to submit its findings to the FDA as a part of a package seeking a meeting with the FDA to advance clinical development.

Patents and Proprietary Information

License Agreement with the University of Pittsburgh

SkinJect entered into an exclusive license agreement with the University of Pittsburgh on April 26, 2016 (as amended, the "License Agreement"). The License Agreement was amended on February 26, 2020 and on April 23, 2024.

The License Agreement covers products designed to deliver drugs and bioactive agents, such as, but not limited to doxorubicin, for the treatment of cancers and pre-cancerous lesions, but specifically excluding the treatment of in-transit melanoma. Such treatments may include, but are not limited to, the use of agents that stimulate an immune response, which is different from vaccines, where an immune response is provoked by presentation of an antigen (the "Field").

The term of the License Agreement runs until the expiration of the last claim of the Patent Rights listed in the License Agreement, which is projected to be November 6, 2035 and could be extended, unless terminated earlier (the "Term"). The University of Pittsburgh has the right to terminate the License Agreement if breaches are not cured within 30 days of our receipt of written notice thereof from the University of Pittsburgh or in certain insolvency-related situations or if we cease to carry out its business.

The License Agreement covers any product or part thereof or service which is (a) covered in whole or in part by an issued, unexpired or pending claim contained in the Patent Rights in the country in which any such product or part thereof is made, used or sold or in which any such service is used or sold; (b) manufactured by using a process or is employed to practice a process which is covered in whole or in part by an issued, unexpired claim or a pending claim contained in the Patent Rights in the country in which any such process that is included in Licensed Technology is used or in which such product or part thereof or service is used or sold; or (c) manufactured by or otherwise makes use of Know How (as defined below) (the "Licensed Technology").

The License Agreement also covers Know How that includes: (a) the University of Pittsburgh's IND Application 122488 for Microneedle Array (carboxymethylcellulose matrix) containing the active drug, doxorubicin for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, (b) experimental protocols, data, and any supporting materials relating to B16 Melanoma murine experiments comparing tumor growth over time for Microneedle Array -delivered chemo-immunotherapy for B16 melanoma, including control mice that did not receive any treatment and mice that were treated with doxorubicin incorporated into Microneedle Arrays, and (c) Response from the University of Pittsburgh for SkinJect's Know How Request provided April 29, 2016 and accompanying Batch Analysis documentation (the "Know How").

We have been granted an exclusive, worldwide license to make, have made, use and sell the Licensed Technology in the Field and to practice under the patent rights listed in the table below for the Term of the License. We have also been granted a non-exclusive worldwide license to practice under the Know How in the Field for the Term of the License.

The University of Pittsburgh has also granted to us an option to enter into a non-exclusive license in the Field to Future Intellectual Property Rights upon such terms and conditions as the parties may agree and which contain similar standard terms and conditions as contained hereunder to the extent not prohibited by law, regulation, or third-party obligations within sixty (60) days after University informs us that the clinical trial under the University of Pittsburgh's IND 122488 is closed and the final report for such clinical trial is completed ("Option Exercise"). Upon University's timely receipt of such written notice from us, the parties shall negotiate in good faith, which negotiations shall commence no later than sixty (60) days following Option Exercise and shall endeavor to enter into a definitive royalty-bearing license agreement as soon thereafter as reasonably possible. In furtherance of the foregoing, University has agreed to disclose from time to time at University's sole discretion to SkinJect Future Intellectual Property Rights until expiration of the option. Future Intellectual Property Rights are defined as specific Know How encompassed within the University of Pittsburgh's IND 122488 and/or deriving from studies conducted under such IND which the University of Pittsburgh owns or controls before or after the April 26, 2016.

The University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University have retained a royalty-free, nonexclusive right to practice under the Patent Rights and to use the Licensed Technology for Non-Commercial Education and Research Purposes. Non-Commercial Education and Research Purposes are defined as the use of Patent Rights (including distribution of biological materials covered by the Patent Rights) in the Field for academic research or other not-for-profit scholarly purposes which are undertaken at a nonprofit or governmental institution that does not use the Patent Rights in the production or manufacture of products for sale or the performance of services for a fee. The license granted is subject to the rights of the U.S. government, if any, as set forth in 35 U.S.C. §200, et seq. The U.S. government may have acquired a nonexclusive, nontransferable, paid-up license to practice or have practiced for or on behalf of the United States the inventions described in the Patent Rights throughout the world. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §200, et seq. Licensed Technology produced for sale in the United States shall be substantially manufactured in the United States (unless a waiver under 35 U.S.C. §204 is granted by the appropriate U.S. government agencies).

We have the right to enter into sublicensing arrangements for the rights, privileges and licenses granted hereunder upon prior written approval of each sublicensee by the University of Pittsburgh, except that sublicensee shall not have rights to sublicense. Such sublicense agreements shall include a royalty rate upon sublicense Net Sales in an amount at least equal to the rate set forth in Article 5.1(c). Rights of any sublicensee shall terminate upon termination of this Agreement.

We are obligated to pay annual maintenance fees, which are non-refundable, non-creditable, and not to be prorated against any other payment or royalties due, in the amount of $5,000 until the first Net Sales occurs. we are further obligated to pay 15.0% of any execution fees, maintenance fees, milestone fees and all other non-royalty payments received by us from any of our sublicensees a share of Non-Royalty Sublicense Income.

Royalties are payable in an amount equal to 3.0% of Net Sales payable each calendar quarter with a minimum annual royalty of $50,000 per calendar year, but only to the extent such minimum royalty is greater than the aggregate annual royalty.

The License Agreement contains six milestones listed below:

1. Establish validated analytical methods related to licensed technology.

2. Submit IND application to FDA relating to licensed technology.

3. Raise $2.5 million of capital form investors or strategic partners (or combination thereof) in support of development or commercializing the licensed technology.

4. Submit a completed report to FDA of a Phase 2 trial of licensed technology or foreign equivalent.

5. Submit an NDA or foreign equivalent for a covered product under Licensed Technology.

6. First commercial sale of Licensed Technology within five years of submission of a NDA or foreign equivalent for a product covered under Licensed Technology.

The first four milestones have been achieved and noted as completed by the University of Pittsburgh on January 6th, 2022.

Payments made to the University of Pittsburgh in connection with the License Agreement, including patent legal expense reimbursement, have amounted to $671,819 since April 2016. We expect the patent legal expense reimbursement to continue at an average of approximately $7,000 per month. Should sales commence in the future, royalties are payable to the University of Pittsburgh as described above.

Our failure to perform or to fulfill on a timely basis any one of the milestones set forth above shall be grounds for university to terminate this Agreement and upon termination all rights and interest to the Licensed Technology, Patent Rights, Know How, and Future Intellectual Property shall revert to university. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for a single time, if one of the milestones defined above has not been achieved within the required timeframe, through no fault of ours, and following best efforts of ours to meet the milestone, we shall be deemed to have fulfilled the milestone requirement if we make a payment of $50,000. In such case, in addition to the payment required, we shall negotiate with the University of Pittsburgh in good faith a new date for attainment of such missed milestone. If we fail to meet the revised milestone date, the University of Pittsburgh may terminate the License Agreement and upon termination all rights and interest to the Licensed Technology shall revert to the University of Pittsburgh.

Except as described above, there are no future milestone payments to be paid pursuant to the License Agreement.

We are in compliance with the License Agreement (after giving effect to such waivers and amendments as have been granted or entered into). The time taken to reach future milestones is dependent on several factors, not all of which are controlled by us. Although there can be no assurance that it will do so, we expect the University of Pittsburgh will grant any necessary future extensions to milestone requirements commensurate with our progress with its clinical development plan.

We have licensed three patent families from the University of Pittsburgh that include several granted U.S. patents and pending U.S. patent applications, as well as granted patents and pending patent applications in foreign jurisdictions, relating to microneedle arrays for delivering various drugs and bioactive agents to the skin, their use, and manufacture. The first patent family entitled "dissolvable microneedle arrays for transdermal delivery to human skin" includes 2 issued U.S. patents expiring in 2030 and 2031 claiming dissolvable microneedle arrays including a variety of bioactive components. This family also includes a pending U.S application. The second patent family entitled "Tip-loaded microneedle arrays for transdermal insertion" includes 1 issued U.S. patent expiring in 2033 claiming dissolvable microneedle arrays including one or more bioactive components. This family also includes issued patents in Australia, Canada, Japan and Mexico, and pending applications in the U.S., Australia, Europe, Hong Kong, India, Japan, and Mexico. The third patent family entitled "Microneedle arrays for cancer therapy applications" includes a pending U.S. patent application as well as pending patent applications in Australia, Canada, Europe, Israel, Japan, and Korea relating to the use of microneedle arrays comprising one or more bioactive agents for the treatment of various cancers, which if issued, would have a natural expiration in 2035. The table below summarizes the patents covered by the License Agreement, each of which is a utility patent.

MANAGEMENT

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information relating to our directors and executive officers as of the date of this offering circular. Directors of Medicus hold office for a one year term and, unless re-elected, will retire from office at the end of the next annual meeting of the shareholders of Medicus. Unless otherwise stated, the business address of our executive officers and directors is our office address at 300 Conshohocken State Rd., Suite 200, W. Conshohocken, PA 19428.

Notes:

(1) Member of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Lavelle is the Chair.

(2) Member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Ciaruffoli is the Chair.

(3)  Member of the Corporate Disclosure Committee. Mr. Ciaruffoli is the Chair.

(4)  Member of the Governance Committee. Mr. Fishman is the Chair.

(5)  Member of the Nominating Committee. Dr. Kaiser is the Chair.

Set forth below is a description of the background of the directors and executive officers of Medicus.

Dr. Raza Bokhari, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dr. Bokhari has served as our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since September 2023. Dr. Bokhari works full time for the Company.

A recipient of Philadelphia Business Journal's "40 under 40" award, Dr. Raza Bokhari, a physician turned serial entrepreneur, has a demonstrated successful track record in aggregating and accelerating life sciences, healthcare services and Pharmaceutical R&D companies.

He previously served as Executive Chairman and CEO of FSD Pharma (Nasdaq: HUGE) (2020 to 2021), where his strategies successfully pivoted the company out of medicinal cannabis and into a clinical stage pharmaceutical R&D, a transition marked by a NASDAQ listing in January 2020, and raising nearly $100M institutional capital to fuel growth and expansion.

In addition to his corporate roles, Dr. Bokhari serves as the Vice Chairman of the World Affairs Council of Philadelphia. He formerly served on the Board of Temple University's Fox School of Business and Management as Chairman of the Executive Advisory Committee and was a Trustee of the esteemed Franklin Institute and Foreign Policy Research Institute.

Dr. Bokhari, through his family foundation, believes in giving back and investing in the community. In recognition of a $1 million gift, he made to his alma mater, Temple University, its Fox Business School named the Innovation & Entrepreneurship Institute Suite in his honor. The school acknowledged Dr. Bokhari in 2018 by naming him a Centennial Honoree, a special collection of entrepreneurs, visionaries, and disruptors who helped shape the Fox School and the business world since 1918.

Dr. Bokhari has a Doctor of Medicine degree from the University of Punjab, Rawalpindi Medical College, and an Executive MBA from Temple University, Fox School of Business & Management.

Dr. Larry Kaiser, Director

Dr. Larry Kaiser has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2023.

Dr. Kaiser has been the Managing Director with the Healthcare Industry Group at Alvarez and Marsal, a leading global professional services firm, since 2020. Most recently, Dr. Kaiser was the President and CEO of the $2.2 billion Temple University Health System, Dean of Temple University's Lewis Katz School of Medicine, and Senior Executive Vice President for Health Sciences at Temple University (2011 to 2019). Among his many accomplishments at Temple was the acquisition of the Fox Chase NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, the development of a number of programs, including the number one lung transplant program in the country, a nationally recognized program in pulmonary hypertension, in addition to growing programs in cardiovascular surgery, thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, and orthopedic surgery. Before joining Temple University in 2011, Dr. Kaiser served as the President of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (2008 to 2011), the largest of six health-related campuses at the University of Texas.

Dr. Kaiser graduated AOA (Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Fraternity) from the Tulane University School of Medicine in 1977 and completed his residency in general surgery as well as a fellowship in surgical oncology at the University of California, Los Angeles. He then completed a residency in cardiovascular and thoracic surgery at the University of Toronto. Following that, he held positions as attending thoracic surgeon at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Assistant Professor of Surgery at Cornell University Medical College (both New York City) and subsequently as Associate Professor (with tenure) at the Washington University School of Medicine (St. Louis) (1988 to 1991). At the University of Pennsylvania, Dr. Kaiser held a variety of positions from 1991 to 2008, including chief of general thoracic surgery, founder and director of the university's lung transplantation program, director of its Center for Lung Cancers and Related Disorders, and co-director of the Thoracic Oncology Laboratory. In 2001, following a national search, he was named the John Rhea Barton Professor and Chair of the Department of Surgery as well as Surgeon in Chief for the University of Pennsylvania Health System. In 1997, Dr. Kaiser was named as the first recipient of the Eldridge Eliason Professorship of Surgery endowment at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

Robert J. Ciaruffoli, Director

Robert J. Ciaruffoli has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2023.

Mr. Ciaruffoli is the co-founder and has been the Chairman of Broad Street Angels since 2016, a 100-member Philadelphia-based angel investor network which invests in start-up entrepreneurial businesses with high growth potential. Broad Street Angels is the largest angel investor network in the Philadelphia region.

Mr. Ciaruffoli is a CPA and served as the Chairman and CEO of the Parente Beard/Baker Tilly accounting and advisory firm (2000 to 2015). During his tenure as Chairman and CEO, he and his team transitioned the firm from a Pennsylvania practice to a multi-state super-regional firm. In 2014, he orchestrated a merger of the Parente Beard and Baker Tilly Virchow Krause firms to create the 12th largest U.S. accounting and advisory firm. Mr. Ciaruffoli also served on the board of directors and executive committee of Baker Tilly International, the 8th largest global accounting network. During his tenure on the board and the executive committee, Baker Tilly International grew from an unranked network to the eighth largest global accounting network.

Throughout his career, Mr. Ciaruffoli has served on numerous for-profit and not-for-profit boards. Presently, he is a board member of Ben Franklin Technology Partners. He was also the past chairman of the Pennsylvania State Board of Accountancy.

Mr. Ciaruffoli holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Kings College, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania and has proudly served in the U.S. Marine Corps (1970 - 1972).

Frank Lavelle, Director

Frank Lavelle has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2023.

For the past 40 years, Mr. Lavelle has been a President and Chief Executive Officer of global and multinational organizations focused on high-value data, analytics, technology solutions, and actionable insights for healthcare and life sciences manufacturers, payers, and providers. Mr. Lavelle has also brought technology solutions to public health, education, and the public sector over his career.

Mr. Lavelle has owned and operated F W Lavelle Consulting LLC since 2019, providing advisory services to healthcare and life sciences manufacturers with a primary focus on pharmaceutical development and public health.

During his career, Mr. Lavelle was President and Chief Executive Officer of Siemens Health Solutions (2000 to 2003), one of the world's largest suppliers to the healthcare industry; Chief Executive Officer and director of Symphony Health Solutions (2013 to 2014) which gave deep insight into the pharmaceutical market tracking drug development and use on over 280 million patients and 65% of all specialty drug activity; board member and advisor to Symphony Performance Health (2014 to 2016) working with accountable health organizations, direct contracting entities, and health systems to improve health systems costs with analytics into the performance of their provider network; President of MedQuist (2004 to 2007) the world's largest provider of voice-to-coding solutions for healthcare, dictation, and speech recognition software. In addition, Mr. Lavelle was President and Chief Executive Officer of SunGard Public Sector and Education (2015 to 2017) specializing in software solutions for cities and public schools which cover public safety, public administration, and public education (K-12) touching 150 million citizens and 17.5 million students.

Mr. Lavelle received his B.A. in Marketing from Pennsylvania State University.

William L. Ashton, Director

William L. Ashton has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2023.

Mr. Ashton is a former Fortune 100 senior executive with over 35 years' experience in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical business. Mr. Ashton retired from a successful career at Amgen Inc. where he served in various positions since 1989 including Vice President of U.S. Sales, Vice President/General Manager of the Corporate Accounts, and Vice President of Government and Commercial Affairs where he was responsible for working with the FDA, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Advocacy groups.

He previously worked for Boehringer-Ingelheim and Warner Lambert Pharmaceuticals.

Mr. Ashton has been the President at Harrison Consulting Group, LLC, a privately held biopharmaceutical/ healthcare consulting firm with expertise in commercialization, payer strategy, and reimbursement since 2013.

He has served on the boards of several publicly traded pharmaceutical companies, namely, Spectrum Oncology, where he was Chairman of the Board, Baudax Bio, Societal CDMO, Sucampo Pharmaceuticals and Galena Bio Pharma. On February 22, 2024, Baudax Bio filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the eastern District of Pennsylvania.

In addition, he has served on the boards of the National Osteoporosis Foundation, Friends of the National Library of Medicine, and is a Commissioner on the Medical Representatives National Certification Commission.

Following his extensive pharmaceutical career, Mr. Ashton was the Founding Dean and assistant professor at the Mayes College of Healthcare Business and Policy (2007 to 2013) at the University of the Sciences of Philadelphia (now St. Joseph University).

Mr. Ashton holds a B.S. in Education from the University of California of Pennsylvania, (now Penn Western University) and a M.A. in Education from the University of Pittsburgh.

Barry Fishman, Director

Barry Fishman has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2023.

Mr. Fishman has almost 25 years of experience as an entrepreneurial business leader, most recently as CEO of VIVO Cannabis Inc. (2017 to 2020). Prior to joining VIVO, Mr. Fishman served as CEO of international specialty pharmaceutical company Merus Labs (2014 to 2017), through its 2017 acquisition by Norgine M.V. He also previously served as CEO of Teva Canada (2003 to 2014), a major affiliate of the world's largest generic drug-maker and began his pharmaceutical career at Eli Lilly Canada, where he served as Vice President of Marketing (1983 to 2000). Mr. Fishman has also recently served as an independent director on a number of high-profile boards, including Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation. Mr. Fishman graduated from McGill University with a concentration in finance and went on to become a CPA while working for Deloitte in Southern California.

Dr. Sara R. May, Director

Sara May, PhD, has served as a member of our board of directors since June 2024.

Dr. May is a highly skilled professional with over 10 years of experience managing large-scale commercial and research projects within regulated industries. Dr. May brings a multidisciplinary background in quality assurance and compliance, clinical trial management, environmental consulting, and data analytics. She has direct experience working with regulators including the FDA, Health Canada and Canada Revenue Agency.

Dr. May started her career in environmental consulting at Beacon Environmental, an employee-owned environmental consulting firm in Ontario, Canada, where she currently holds the position of Senior Terrestrial Ecologist and Geomatics Manager (2012 to present). Dr. May has also served as the President of FV Pharma Inc. (2018 to 2020), a start up public cannabis company where she was responsible for all aspects of operations, and Senior Vice President of FSD Pharma Inc. (2020 to 2022), where Dr. May led several enterprise-wide transformation initiatives focused on enabling the company's business model to adapt to the shift in markets from cannabis to boutique pharma and drug development.

In addition, Dr. May brings deep corporate governance experience through her work with both corporate and not for profit boards, including contributing to the public listing and uplisting process of several start-up cannabis and boutique pharmaceutical companies. Dr. May has served on the board of directors of FV Pharma Inc. (2018 to 2020) and the board of directors of Cannara Biotech (2019 to 2020) where she chaired the Compensation Committee and was a member of the Corporate Governance Committee. She has also been a member of the YMCA Northumberland Charity Board (2020 to 2023) where she chaired the Finance Audit and Risk Committee and has been on the board of directors of Beacon Environmental since 2023.

Dr. May received her Bachelor of Science (Honours) degree in Botany and Plant Genetics from the University of Guelph and her PhD in Evolutionary Genetics from Queen's University.

Carolyn Bonner, President

Carolyn Bonner has served as our President since September 2023.

Ms. Bonner until recently was the President & CEO of Parkway Clinical Laboratories (2019 to 2023), a College of American pathologist (CAP), accredited diagnostic company, serving healthcare providers across the United States.

Ms. Bonner was the Director of Corporate Development at Building Beyond BRIC Investment Fund (2019 to 2023) where she was extensively involved in fundraising, marketing, and assisting with back office operations from May 2009 to December 2011.

Previously Ms. Bonner was the Director of Business Development at Parkway Clinical Laboratories ("PCL"), where she delivered client guided customization of PCL services and creative corporate partnerships. Carolyn also simultaneously served as Director of Corporate Development for Rosetta Genomics, a publicly traded Israeli biotech company, the parent company of PCL, from July 2008 to May 2009.

Ms. Bonner started her career in 2006 as a sales executive at Lakewood Pathology (now called PLUS Diagnostics), which is owned and operated by Water Street Healthcare Partners, a Chicago based private equity fund. Ms. Bonner has a B.A. focused in marketing from West Chester University.

James Quinlan, Chief Financial Officer

James Quinlan has served as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2023.

Mr. Quinlan is a Certified Public Accountant, Certified Financial Planner, Chartered Financial Consultant and has spent his career in financial services. He has been President of Trinity Financial Advisors, Smart Financial Advisors (1999 to 2007), and Beneficial Advisors (2007 to 2011), as well as a Partner at both Smart Business Advisory and Consulting (1999 to 2008), and Wipfli, LLP (2017 to 2022). While at Wipfli he was the U.S. Mid Atlantic regional leader for both Tax and Wealth management services (2017 to 2022).

Mr. Quinlan has been recognized in the Philadelphia region as a recipient of the 40 under 40 award and is very active in the community. His past board involvement includes acting as President of the Catholic Charities Appeal for the Archdiocese of Philadelphia (2011 to 2016), and Development Chair for the Archbishop John Carroll High School Board (2010 to 2020).

Mr. Quinlan has an MBA from Villanova University and a BS degree from Bucknell University.

Dr. Edward Brennan, Chief Scientific Officer & Head of R&D Program

Dr. Edward Brennan has served as our Chief Scientific Officer & Head of R&D Program since November 2024. Before that, Dr. Brennan served as our Chief Medical Officer since September 2023.

Dr. Brennan has more than 25 years of experience in leadership roles at major pharmaceutical companies and clinical research organizations. He is an accomplished biopharmaceutical executive with a proven track record in FDA submissions and drug development.

Dr. Brennan has extensive experience in all phases of clinical development across multiple therapeutic areas. As a Medical Director with Wyeth-Ayerst Research (2000 to 2003), and GlaxoSmithKline (2003 to 2007), he led teams through ten IND applications and advanced multiple compounds from pre-candidate selection (proof of concept) through clinical trial management and approval. At GSK, he was also responsible for coordinating all clinical activities for external partners within its Center of Excellence in External Drug Discovery. Dr. Brennan next founded IndiPharm (2007 to 2016), a full-service global CRO that was eventually acquired by private equity company, Velocity Fund Partners.

Dr. Brennan received his undergraduate Bachelor of Science Degree in Pharmacy from the Philadelphia College of Pharmacy and Science. He went on to study Medicine at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland before receiving his medical degree from the Temple University School of Medicine.

Dr. Faisal Mehmud, Chief Medical Officer

Dr. Faisal Mehmud has served as our Chief Medical Officer since November 2024.

Dr. Mehmud is a seasoned pharmaceutical executive, who brings over 20 years of global experience as a senior medical professional in clinical development, medical affairs, and drug safety across various therapeutic areas, including oncology, hematology, rare diseases, and primary care. He has played a central role in multiple successful launches of new medicines and has spearheaded innovative global medical lifecycle management strategies including for small molecules, antibodies, cell therapies and cytotoxic chemotherapies. Dr. Mehmud's expertise encompasses late-phase development, product launch, and the seamless integration of new therapies into treatment pathways, all with a focus on improving patient outcomes through forward thinking clinical development plans. Dr. Mehmud's career includes senior roles at leading pharmaceutical companies such as Sanofi, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) based in London, Paris and Philadelphia.

Most recently, Dr. Mehmud was the Senior Vice President, Data Generation and Scientific Communications in Worldwide Global Medical Affairs at GlaxoSmithKline (LSE/NYSE:GSK), which included leadership of medical affairs sponsored and supported, interventional and non-interventional clinical trials

Before GSK, Dr. Mehmud was with Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE), where he served in various roles including as Vice President and Worldwide Medical Franchise Head for Precision Medicine and Early Oncology Development, advancing the precision medicine oncology portfolio in a variety of tumor types, and supporting early-stage oncology projects moving from early clinical development to full development and market readiness, effectively bridging scientific innovation with commercial strategy.

Dr. Mehmud has also held leadership roles at Bristol Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY), including as Vice President in global drug safety, where he oversaw the safety risk management of complex therapies, including antibody-based treatments and cellular therapies.

Dr. Mehmud completed a medical degree from the University of Cambridge, and has received diplomas in internal medicine and pharmaceutical medicine from the Royal College of Physicians and holds a medical license with the UK General Medical Council.

Penalties, Sanctions, Cease Trade Orders or Bankruptcies

Penalties or Sanctions

Other than as disclosed, to our knowledge, no director or executive officer, or shareholder holding a sufficient number of our securities to materially affect the control of us, has been subject to: (i) any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority; or (ii) any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

Individual Bankruptcies

To our knowledge, no director or executive officer, or shareholder holding a sufficient number of our securities to materially affect the control of us, has, within the ten years prior to the date of this offering circular, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his or her assets.

Corporate Cease Trade Orders and Bankruptcies

To our knowledge, no director or executive officer, or shareholder holding a sufficient number of our securities to materially affect the control of us, is, as at the date of this offering circular, or has been within the ten years prior to the date of this offering circular: (a) a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of any company that was subject to an order that was issued while the director or executive officer was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer; (b) was subject to an order that was issued after the director or executive officer ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer; or (c) a director or executive officer of any company that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets. For the purposes of this paragraph, "order" means a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, in each case, that was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days.

Conflicts of Interest

To the best of our knowledge, except as disclosed elsewhere in this offering circular, we are not aware of any existing or potential material conflicts of interest between us and any of our directors or officers as of the date hereof. However, certain of our directors and officers are, or may become, directors or officers of other companies with businesses, which may conflict with its business. Accordingly, conflicts of interest may arise which could influence these individuals in evaluating possible acquisitions or in generally acting on our behalf. See also "Risk Factors."

Pursuant to the OBCA, our directors and officers are required to act honestly and in good faith with a view to act in our best interests. Generally, as a matter of practice, directors who have disclosed a material interest in any contract or transaction that the Board is considering will not take part in any board discussion respecting that contract or transaction. If on occasion such directors do participate in the discussions, they will refrain from voting on any matters relating to matters in which they have disclosed a material interest. In appropriate cases, we will establish a special committee of independent directors to review a matter in which directors or officers may have a conflict.

Composition of Board of Directors

Our board of directors (the "Board") is responsible for the general supervision of the management of our business and affairs with the objective of enhancing shareholder value. The Board discharges its responsibilities directly and through its committees.

Our board consists of seven directors: Dr. Larry Kaiser, Robert J. Ciaruffoli, Frank Lavelle, William L. Ashton, Barry Fishman, Dr. Sara R. May and Dr. Raza Bokhari. Dr. Bokhari is the Chairman of the Board. Robert J. Ciaruffoli acts as independent lead director and will assume the duties of the Chairman as and when required to address any actual or potential conflicts of interest.

Our articles provide that the number of directors may be between 1 and 15. The number of directors may be increased or decreased upon approval of the shareholders or, in certain circumstances and subject to our articles, by a majority of the directors. Our directors are elected at each annual general meeting of our shareholders and serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected or appointed unless their positions are earlier vacated.

Director Term Limits and Other Mechanisms of Board Renewal

Our Board has not adopted director term limits, a retirement policy for its directors or other automatic mechanisms of board renewal. Our Board will hold office for a one year term and, unless re-elected, will retire from office at the end of the next annual meeting of the shareholders of Medicus.

Director Independence

Our Board has determined that six members of our Board are "independent," as defined under the Nasdaq rules and for purposes of Canadian securities laws and therefore, a majority of the directors on our Board are independent. Dr. Bokhari is not considered independent by virtue of his management position.

For purposes of the Nasdaq rules, an independent director means a person other than an executive officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of our Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, subject to certain additional limitations. A director is considered to be independent for the purposes of Canadian securities laws if the director has no direct or indirect material relationship to the company. A material relationship is a relationship that could, in the view of the Board, be reasonably expected to interfere with the exercise of a director's independent judgment. Certain individuals, such as our employees and executive officers, are deemed by Canadian securities laws to have material relationships with us.

We will take steps to ensure that adequate structures and processes will be in place following the consummation of this offering to permit our Board to function independently of management, including for purposes of encouraging an objective process for nominating directors and determining executive compensation.

Meetings of Directors

Our Board holds regularly scheduled meetings as well as ad hoc meetings from time to time. The independent members of our Board will also meet, as required, without the non-independent directors and members of management before or after each regularly scheduled board meeting.

Board of Directors' Charter

The Board has adopted a written mandate. The primary mandate of the Board is supervision of the senior management of the business, the going concern and general affairs of the Company. The Board discharges certain of its responsibilities through delegation to its committees as more particularly set out in committee mandates.

Position Descriptions

The Board has adopted a written position description for the lead independent director, which position is currently held by Robert J. Ciaruffoli, as well as a written position description for individual directors.

The Board does not intend on adopting written position descriptions for the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), other than as described in the CEO's employment contract, or the committee chairs on the basis that the roles are well understood by all of the directors. In general, the roles of the Board and committee chairs are to ensure that the Mandate of the Board or the mandate of a committee, as set out in their respective charters, are carried out in full.

With respect to the chairs of the committees, the Board has determined that their responsibilities include providing leadership to the applicable committee to carry out the committee's mandate as set out in a charter or through regulatory requirements and enhancing the committee's effectiveness through facilitating the committee's interaction with management, the Board and other committees of the Board and reporting as appropriate to the Board with respect to the committee's work.

With respect to the CEO, the CEO is responsible for our overall leadership and management in accordance with the strategies, policies and mandates established by the Board from time to time, and reports to the Board regarding our management and operations including the progress or deviations, if any, from the strategic plans set by the Board.

Orientation and Continuing Education

The Governance Committee, in conjunction with the Chair of the Board and the CEO, is responsible for ensuring that new directors are provided with an orientation program. It is not anticipated that we will adopt any formal policies with respect to the orientation of new directors, nor is it anticipated to provide continuing education for the directors. Formal policies with respect to director orientation and education will be implemented as and when warranted by growth of our operations.

Ethical Business Conduct

The Board has adopted a written code of conduct and ethics for its directors, officers, employees, contractors and consultants (the "Code"). The Board will be responsible for monitoring compliance with the Code. The Board has also adopted a whistleblower policy.

The Board will take appropriate measures to exercise independent judgment in considering transactions and agreements in respect of which a director or executive officer may have a material interest. Where appropriate, directors will abstain from portions of board or committee meetings to allow independent discussion of points in issue.

Conflicts of Interest

When faced with a conflict, it is required that business judgment of responsible persons, uninfluenced by considerations other than our best interests, will be exercised in compliance with the guidelines set out in the Code. Pursuant to the OBCA, any of our officers or directors with a conflict of interest must disclose the nature and extent of such conflict to the Board and recuse themselves from a matter that materially conflicts with that individual's duty as one of our directors or senior officers.

Protection and Proper Use of Corporate Assets, Information and Opportunities

Confidential information is not to be used for any purposes other than ours. This requirement of confidentiality extends beyond the duty not to discuss private information, whether about us and/or our management and also applies to any of our assets, including trade secrets, patient, supplier or customer lists, business plans, computer software, company records and other proprietary information. The Code provides for certain specific guidelines around the duty of confidentiality of our directors, officers, employees, contractors and consultants.

In the situation of contracts with third parties such as suppliers and service providers, management is to share only that information which is needed to satisfy the conditions of the contract and only to those individuals who need to know.

The duty of confidentiality applies to all directors, officers, employees, contractors and consultants even after leaving their position with us, regardless of the reason for departing.

Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations

It is required that we are in compliance with all legislation applicable to our business operations, including but not restricted to the federal and provincial laws of Canada, and any other applicable laws in jurisdictions where the company operates.

All Board members and employees have a duty to know, understand and comply with any specific legislation pertaining to our business and any legislation applicable to their duties and responsibilities.

The Code provides guidelines surrounding, among other items, compliance with applicable laws, conflicts of interest, certain opportunities, confidentiality and disclosure, employment practices, and use of our property and resources.

Insider Trading Policy

The Board has adopted an insider trading policy to set forth basic guidelines for trading in our securities and to preserve our confidential information so as to avoid any situation that might have the potential to damage our reputation, or which could constitute a violation of applicable securities law by our officers, directors, or employees. Under this policy, "insiders" (i.e., officers, members of the Board and other individuals having access to material non-public information) are prohibited from trading in common shares and other securities on the basis of such material non-public information until after the information has been disclosed to the public. The obligation not to trade on inside information applies not only to our insiders, but also to persons who obtain such information from insiders and use it to their advantage. Thus, liability may be imposed upon us, our insiders and also outsiders who are the source of leaks of material information not yet disclosed to the public and the leaks coincide with purchases or sales of our securities (i) by such insiders or outsiders, (ii) by the us, or (iii) by "tippees" (including relatives, friends, investment analysts, etc.).

We have established scheduled "blackout periods" prohibiting sales or purchases by our directors and officers, and any other employee, independent contractor, or consultant of the Company who receives notice from our Chief Financial Officer that they are designated blacked-out employees in respect of a given period prior to the release of financial results which continue until two business days after the time such information has been released to the public and which begin, (i) in the case of interim period financial results, ten business days prior to the end of the fiscal quarter; and (ii) in the case of annual financial results, ten business days before the end of the annual period. From time to time due to specific or anticipated events, we may feel it necessary to issue an unscheduled blackout period for a specific or indefinite period covering insiders or specific employees or groups.

Diversity Policy

The Board has adopted a written diversity policy relating to the identification and nomination of directors or members of senior management that are women, Indigenous peoples (First Nations, Inuit, and Metis), persons with disabilities or members of other racial, ethnic and/or visible minorities (collectively, "Designated Groups"). The Board and the Nominating Committee generally identifies, evaluates, and recommends candidates to become members of the Board or members of senior management with the goal of creating a Board and members of the senior management team that, as a whole, consists of individuals who possess extensive knowledge and competencies, diverse points of view, and relevant expertise, provide balance in terms of the knowledge and competencies of and represent all genders, various ages, and geographic and ethnic diversity, religious belief, cultural background, economic circumstance, human capacity, sexual orientation, as well as a broad range of business and educational experience, professional expertise, personal skills and perspectives The diversity policy identifies specific targets in respect of appointing persons from Designated Groups to the Board and in respect of executive officer appointments.

Committees of our Board of Directors

The Board may establish such other committees as it determines to be appropriate. Each permanent committee will have a mandate that is approved by the Board setting out the responsibilities of, and the extent of the powers delegated to, such committee by the Board.

Assessment of Directors, the Board and Board Committees

The Board is responsible for assessing its own mandate and the effectiveness in fulfilling its mandate and assesses the mandate and effectiveness of fulfilling each of the other committees (considering, among other things, the recommendation of the applicable committee) from time to time and at least annually.

Audit Committee

Composition of Audit Committee

Our audit committee is currently comprised of four members, including Robert J. Ciaruffoli, Frank Lavelle, Barry Fishman and Dr. Sara R. May. Each member of our audit committee is a non-employee member of our Board. In addition, each member of our audit committee is financially literate, as required by the Nasdaq rules and Canadian securities laws. All of the members of our audit committee are "independent" members of our Board, as required by the Nasdaq rules, Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and Canadian securities laws.

Relevant Education and Experience

The education and related experience of each of the members of the Audit Committee that is relevant to the performance of his responsibilities as a member of the Audit Committee is described below.

Robert J. Ciaruffoli

Robert J. Ciaruffoli has served as a member of our audit committee since 2023. Mr. Ciaruffoli holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Kings College, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. Mr. Ciaruffoli is a CPA and served as the Chairman and CEO of the Parente Beard/Baker Tilly accounting and advisory firm. Mr. Ciaruffoli also served on the Board and executive committee of Baker Tilly International. Throughout his career, Mr. Ciaruffoli has served on numerous for-profit and not-for-profit boards. Presently, he is a board member of Ben Franklin Technology Partners and the co-founder and Chairman of Broad Street Angels, an angel investor network. He was also the past chairman of the Pennsylvania State Board of Accountancy.

Frank Lavelle

Frank Lavelle has served as a member of our audit committee since 2023. Mr. Lavelle holds a Bachelor of Arts in Marketing from Pennsylvania State University. During his career, Mr. Lavelle served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Siemens Health Solutions, the Chief Executive Officer and director of Symphony Health Solutions, board member and advisor to Symphony Performance Health and as President of MedQuist the world's largest provider of voice-to-coding solutions for healthcare, dictation, and speech recognition software. In addition, Mr. Lavelle was President and Chief Executive Officer of SunGard Public Sector and Education.

Barry Fishman

Barry Fishman has served as a member of our audit committee since 2023. Mr. Fishman holds a Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting and Finance from McGill University. Mr. Fishman is a CPA and has served as Chief Executive Officer of Merus Labs and Teva Canada, and Vice President of Marketing at Eli Lilly Canada. Mr. Fishman has also recently served as an independent director on a number of high-profile boards, including Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation.

Dr. Sara R. May

Dr. Sara R. May has served as a member of our audit committee since 2024. Dr. May brings deep corporate governance experience through her work with both corporate and not for profit boards, including contributing to the public listing and uplisting process of several start-up cannabis and boutique pharmaceutical companies. Dr. May has served on the board of directors of FV Pharma Inc. (2018 to 2020) and the board of directors of Cannara Biotech (2019 to 2020) where she chaired the Compensation Committee and was a member of the Corporate Governance Committee. She has also been a member of the YMCA Northumberland Charity Board (2020 to 2023) where she chaired the Finance Audit and Risk Committee and has been on the board of directors of Beacon Environmental since 2023.

Audit Committee Charter

Our audit committee has adopted an audit committee charter, which details the principal functions of the Audit Committee, including:

• reviewing the financial statements to be included in our annual report and review with the Board and the auditors the results of the annual audit and reviews any financial statements;

• reviewing and recommending to the Board for approval, where appropriate, financial information contained in any prospectuses, annual information forms, annual reports to shareholders, management proxy circulars, press releases, material change disclosures of a financial nature and similar disclosure documents;

• reviewing with our management of the and with our auditor and assess significant accounting principles and disclosure issues and alternative treatments under IFRS or U.S. GAAP, as applicable, all with a view to gaining reasonable assurance that financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, cash flows and the results of our operations in accordance with IFRS or U.S. GAAP, as applicable;

• reviewing and assessing the adequacy and effectiveness of our system of internal control and management information systems, risk management policies and procedures, and financial reporting of any transaction between us, and investigating any alleged fraud;

• reviewing and discussing with our management our major financial risk exposures and the steps taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the use of any financial derivatives and hedging activities;

• reviewing, discussing and investigating any alleged fraud involving our management or employees in relation to the internal controls, including our management's response to any allegations of fraud;

• reviewing the financial reporting of any transaction between us and any officer, director or other "related party" or any entity in which any such person has a financial interest;

• recommending an auditor for nomination and the auditors compensation to the Board, overseeing the work of the auditors, establishing communication with the auditors, reviewing the independence of the auditor, the audit plan, the performance of the auditors, and the results of the external audit and the report thereon;

• monitoring and periodically reviewing our corporate policies and associated procedures, and hiring policies; and

• providing broad oversight of our financial, risk and control related activities.

The Audit Committee has unrestricted access to all information regarding the Company and all our directors, officers and employees and will be directed to cooperate as requested by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has the authority to retain, at our expense, outside legal, financial and other advisors, consultants and experts, to assist the Audit Committee in fulfilling its duties and responsibilities. The Audit Committee also has the authority to communicate directly with the auditors and, if applicable, our internal auditors.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee will pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided to us by its external auditors. The Audit Committee may delegate to one or more of its members the authority to pre-approve non-audit services but preapproval by such member or members so delegated shall be presented to the full Audit Committee at its first scheduled meeting following such pre-approval.

External Auditor Service Fees

The aggregate fees billed by the Company's external auditors in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 are set out below:

Notes:

(1) Audit Fees include fees for performance of the annual audit of the Company's financial statements, reviews of quarterly financial statements, reviews of periodic reports and reviews of other documents required by legislation or regulation.

(2) Audit-Related Fees include fees related to comfort letters, consents and reviews of securities filings.

(3) Tax Fees include fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning professional services. These services included reviewing tax returns and assisting in responses to government tax authorities.

(4) All other fees include aggregate fees billed for professional services which included accounting advice

Compensation Committee

The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to assess and make recommendations to the Board regarding certain compensation matters, including, but not limited to, relating to the development of human resource strategy, policies and programs, the proper utilization of human resources within the Company, with special focus on senior management succession, development and compensation, the compensation of directors and senior executives and other employee benefits.

The Compensation Committee is required to review and assess the adequacy of its charter periodically as conditions dictate, but at least annually, to ensure compliance with any rules or regulations and recommend any modifications to its charter if and when appropriate to the Board for its approval.

Composition of the Compensation Committee

As of the date of this offering circular, the Compensation Committee is comprised of Dr. Larry Kaiser, Robert J. Ciaruffoli, and Frank Lavelle, all of whom are considered independent.

Compensation Committee Charter

The Board has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which sets out the Compensation Committee's responsibilities, including:

• reviewing and recommending on an annual basis, the remuneration of our senior executives to the Board, including any incentive plans of directors and any remuneration policies;

• reviewing the CEO's goals and objectives, including corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO and the CEO's performance in light of those goals and objectives;

• reviewing with the CEO the goals and objectives of other senior executives, including corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of such senior executives, evaluate the performance of senior executives in light of those goals and objectives;

• reviewing, in conjunction with the Nominating Committee, our corporate succession and development plans at the executive officer level;

• reviewing executive compensation disclosure before we publicly disclose this information;

• keeping abreast of current developments in executive compensation in companies engage in similar industries;

• reviewing and making recommendations to the Board in relation to employment offers for a CEO or any senior executive employment offer, or any offer that contains special terms including, but not limited to, any retiring or other allowance agreements, equity-based compensation and any proposed change of control provisions;

• proposing to the Board the engagement of, and manage and supervise, compensation consultants to assist in the evaluation of the compensation of the senior executives' and directors', including the fees and other terms of the retention;

• periodically reviewing the structure and implementation of bonus plans and all share compensation plans;

• reviewing on an annual basis our remuneration policies, including the total remuneration (including benefits) and the main components thereof for the directors and senior executives, and to compare such remuneration policies with the remuneration practices of peers in the same industry;

• reviewing and recommending to the Board for its approval the disclosure required in any management information circular in respect of meetings of our shareholders relating to executive compensation and finalizing the report on executive compensation in any management information circular;

• determining those directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company who will participate in long term incentive plans, the number and type of shares of the Company allocated to each participant under such plan and the time or times when ownership of such shares will vest for each participant;

• administering all matters relating to any long term incentive plan and any employee bonus plan to which the Committee has been delegated authority pursuant to the terms of such plans or any resolutions passed by the Board;

• annually recommending to the Board the CEO's and senior executives' entitlement to be paid a bonus under any employee bonus plan;

• reviewing on an annual basis, its mandate and recommending any proposed changes to the Board;

• reporting regularly to the Board in relation to any matters arising from its review of compensation practices; and

• evaluating the function of the Compensation Committee on an annual basis.

Nominating Committee

The primary function of the Nominating Committee, in accordance with its charter, is to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee our nominating procedures.

The Nominating Committee is required to review and assess the adequacy of its charter periodically as conditions dictate, but at least annually, to ensure compliance with any rules or regulations and recommend any modifications to its charter if and when appropriate to the Board for its approval.

Nominating Committee Composition

As of the date of this offering circular, the Nominating Committee is comprised of Dr. Larry Kaiser, Barry Fishman, and William L. Ashton, all of whom are considered independent.

Nominating Committee Charter

The Board has adopted a written charter for the Nominating Committee, which sets out the Compensation Committee's responsibilities, including;

• making recommendations to the Board with respect to the size, composition and structure of the Board;

• making recommendations to the Board with respect to the reorganization of responsibilities among committees, the creation of additional committees or subcommittees, or the elimination of committees;

• making recommendations to the Board with respect to the preferred experience and qualifications of news directors to be elected by shareholders;

• making recommendations to the Board with respect to qualified candidates for nomination for election to the Board at each annual general meeting of shareholders;

• making recommendations to the Board with respect to the appointment of qualified directors to each committee;

• making recommendations to the Board with respect to developing and overseeing an orientation program for new directors and a continuing education program for current directors;

• making recommendations to the Board with respect to Board succession; and

• conducting annual performance assessments of the Board.

Executive Compensation

Named Executive Officers

Compensation of our named executive officers generally consists of the following elements: base salaries and participation in our equity incentive plan. The following table sets forth all compensation awarded to, or earned by, our named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.

(1) Dr. Raza Bokhari provided executive services to the Company through an agreement between Medicus and RBx, an entity controlled by Dr. Bokhari. RBx also made available to the Company certain other management services and administrative and executive support. The Company paid RBx a fee of US$100,000 per month for the services it provided to the Company.

(2) Dr. Edward Brennan served as our Chief Medical Officer from September 2023 to November 2024. Dr. Edward Brennan has served as our Chief Scientific Officer & Head of R&D Program since November 2024.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth certain information concerning equity awards granted to our named executive officers that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2024.

(1) The options are scheduled to vest quarterly in four equal installments over one year from the grant date of December 17, 2024.

Employment and Consulting Agreements with Executive Officers

We have entered into written employment agreements with James Quinlan, our Chief Financial Officer, Edward Brennan, our Chief Scientific Officer and Faisal Mehmud, our Chief Medical Officer. Such agreements provide for a base salary, an annual discretionary bonus, notice and payment requirements upon termination without cause or as a result of a change in control, and payments following or in connection with any other termination or resignation. Mr. Quinlan, Mr. Brennan and Mr. Mehmud are also subject to non-solicitation and non-competition agreements prohibiting competing with us and soliciting our clients for a period of one year following termination and also prohibiting soliciting our employees, of officers, executives, or agents for a period of one year following termination.

Directors

Compensation of our directors generally consists of annual retainer fees and the Board and committee meeting fees, which are paid on a quarterly basis. There are no special arrangements between us and any director with respect to fees. Our directors are also entitled to participate in our equity incentive plan. Our executive officers who also act as directors do not receive any additional compensation for services rendered in their capacities as directors.

The following table sets forth all compensation awarded to, or earned by, our directors for the year ended December 31, 2024.

(1) Other than Dr. Raza Bokhari, who did not receive any extra compensation for serving as Executive Chairman, all directors were paid $50,000 annually, in quarterly installments, as compensation for Board membership in 2024. In addition, committee Chairs received an annual compensation of $10,000, other than the Chair of the Audit Committee, who received $15,000, and Mr. Ciaruffoli, as the lead director, who received an additional $10,000 per annum.

(2) Dr. Sara R. May joined the Board in June 2024.

Directors' Service Contracts

There are no arrangements or understandings between us, on the one hand, and any of our directors, on the other hand, providing for benefits upon termination of their service as directors of our company.

Employees

As of February 26, 2025, we have 12 employees, all of which are full-time employees. None of our current employees were employees of Velocity Fund Partners or of SkinJect prior to the Business Combination.

Equity Incentive Plan

Background

The Board has adopted an Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), which was approved by shareholders on July 28, 2023. The Plan allows for the issuance of restricted share units ("RSUs"), and stock options ("Options", and together with the RSUs, "Awards").

Purpose

The purpose of the Plan is to (i) assist in the reward, retention and motivation of directors, consultants, and key employees of the Company and its designated affiliates, (ii) link the reward of such persons to shareholder value creation, and (iii) align the interests of the directors, consultants, and key employees of the Company with its shareholders by providing an opportunity to receive an equity interest in the Company.

A summary of the key terms of the Plan is set out below, which is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Plan.

Administration of the Equity Incentive Plan

The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee, which has full authority to administer the Plan, subject to the rules of any stock exchange on which the common shares are listed, including the authority to: (i) interpret and construe any provision of the Plan; (ii) adopt, amend, and rescind such rules and regulations for administering the Plan as the Compensation Committee deems necessary or desirable in order to comply with the requirements of the Plan subject in all cases to compliance with regulatory requirements; (iii) permit an Option to be exercised by way of a "cashless exercise" or "net exercise" basis on terms established by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion and in accordance with the policies of the Nasdaq, or such other principal market on which the common shares are then traded as designated by the Compensation Committee (the "Stock Exchange").

The Compensation Committee may correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan, in the manner and to the extent the Compensation Committee deems, in its discretion, necessary or desirable. All actions taken and all interpretations and determinations made by the Compensation Committee in good faith shall be final and conclusive and shall be binding on each of the Participants (as defined below) and the Company.

Eligibility

The Compensation Committee determines the employees, directors and consultants of the Company who are eligible to participate in the Plan (the "Participants"). The extent to which any Participant is entitled to receive a grant of an Award pursuant to the Plan will be determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee. For Awards granted to eligible directors, eligible employees and consultants, the Company and the Participant are responsible for ensuring and confirming that the Participant is a bona fide eligible director, eligible employee or consultant, as the case may be.

Common Shares Subject to the Equity Incentive Plan

The Plan is a "rolling up to 10% and fixed up to 10%" security-based compensation plan, within the meaning of Policy 4.4 - Security Based Compensation of the TSXV. The Plan is: a "rolling" plan pursuant to which the number of common shares that are issuable pursuant to the exercise of Options granted under the Plan shall not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares as at the date of any Option grant; and a "fixed" plan under which the number of common shares that are issuable pursuant to all Awards other than Options granted under the Plan and under any other security based compensation plan, in the aggregate is a maximum of 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares as at the effective date of implementation of the Plan.

Insider Participation Limit, Individual Limits, Annual Grant Limits and Non-Employee Director Limits

The maximum number of common shares reserved for issue pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan to Participants who are "insiders" (as a group) in any 12-month period shall not exceed 10% of the number of common shares then outstanding, unless disinterested shareholder approval is received therefor in accordance with the policies of the Stock Exchange.

The maximum number of common shares reserved for issue pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan to Participants who are "insiders" (as a group) at any point in time shall not exceed 10% of the number of common shares then outstanding, unless disinterested shareholder approval is received therefor in accordance with the policies of Stock Exchange.

The maximum number of common shares reserved for issue under Awards granted to any one Participant in any 12-month period shall not exceed 5% of the number of common shares then outstanding, unless disinterested shareholder approval is received therefor in accordance with the policies of the Stock Exchange.

The maximum number of common shares reserved for issue under Awards granted to any one consultant in any 12-month period shall not exceed 2% of the number of common shares then outstanding.

The maximum number of common shares reserved for issue under Options granted to all Participants conducting investor relations activities in any 12-month period shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 2% of the number of common shares then outstanding. Options granted to Participants performing investor relations activities shall vest in stages over a 12-month period, with no more than one-quarter of the Options vesting in any three-month period. No acceleration of the vesting provisions of Options granted to persons retained to provide investor relations activities is allowed without the prior acceptance of the Stock Exchange.

Types of Awards

The Plan provides for the grant of Options and RSUs. All of the Awards described below are subject to the conditions, limitations, restrictions, exercise price, vesting, settlement and forfeiture provisions determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, subject to such limitations provided in the Plan. In addition, subject to the limitations provided in the Plan and in accordance with applicable law, the Board may accelerate or defer the vesting of Awards, modify outstanding Awards, and waive any condition imposed with respect to Awards or common shares issued pursuant to Awards.

Options

An Option is an option granted by the Company to a Participant entitling such Participant to acquire a designated number of common shares from treasury at the exercise price, subject to the provisions of the Plan. For greater certainty, the Company is obligated to issue and deliver the designated number of common shares on the exercise of an Option and shall have no independent discretion to settle an Option in cash or other property other than common shares issued from treasury. For the avoidance of doubt, no dividend equivalents shall be granted in connection with an Option.

Subject to the provisions set forth in the Plan and any shareholder or regulatory approval which may be required, the Compensation Committee shall, from time to time by resolution, in its sole discretion, (a) designate the eligible director, eligible employee or consultant who may receive Options under the Plan, (b) fix the number of Options, if any, to be granted to each eligible director, eligible employee or consultant and the date or dates on which such Options shall be granted, (c) determine the price per common share to be payable upon the exercise of each such Option, (d) determine the relevant vesting provisions (including performance criteria, if applicable) and (e) determine the period of time during which the particular Option may be exercised (the "Option Period").

Each Option granted to a Participant may be evidenced by a stock option notice or stock option agreement setting out terms and conditions consistent with the provisions of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms and conditions (including without limitation any recoupment, reimbursement or claw-back compensation policy as may be adopted by the Compensation Committee from time to time) which are not inconsistent with the Plan and which the Compensation Committee deems appropriate for inclusion in an Option, which terms and conditions need not be the same in each case and which terms and conditions may be changed from time to time.

The price per share (the "Exercise Price") at which any common share which is the subject of an Option may be purchased shall be determined by the Compensation Committee at the time the Option is granted, provided that the Exercise Price shall be not less than the closing price of the common shares on the Stock Exchange on the last trading day immediately preceding the date of the grant of such Option less the maximum discount, if any, permitted by the Stock Exchange or, if the common shares are not then listed on any Stock Exchange, the Exercise Price shall not be less than the fair market value of the common shares as may be determined by the Board on the day immediately preceding the date of the grant of such Option. Disinterested shareholder approval shall be required for any reduction in the Exercise Price of any Option if the optionee is an insider of the Company at the time of the proposed amendment to the Exercise Price.

Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Plan or in any employment contract, Options may be exercised by the optionee in whole at any time, or in part from time to time (in each case to the nearest full common share), during the Option Period only in accordance with the vesting schedule, if any, determined by the Compensation Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, subject to the applicable requirements of the Stock Exchange, at the time of the grant of the Option, which vesting schedule may include performance vesting or acceleration of vesting in certain circumstances and which may be amended or changed by the Compensation Committee from time to time with respect to a particular Option. If the Compensation Committee does not determine a vesting schedule at the time of the grant of any particular Option, such Option shall be exercisable in whole at any time, or in part from time to time, during the Option Period, subject to the applicable requirements of the Stock Exchange. In the event that the common shares are listed on the TSXV, Options with an Exercise Price based on the discounted market price (as such term is defined in the policies of the TSXV), and the common shares issuable upon the exercise thereof, shall be subject to the restricted period and legending requirements imposed by the policies of the TSXV.

RSUs

An RSU is an Award that is a bonus for services rendered in the year of grant, that, upon settlement, entitles the recipient Participant to receive a cash payment equal to the market value of a common share or, at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, a common share, and subject to such restrictions and conditions on vesting as the Compensation Committee may determine at the time of grant, unless such RSU expires prior to being settled. Restrictions and conditions on vesting may, without limitation, be based on the passage of time during continued employment or other service relationship, the achievement of specified performance criteria or both.

Subject to the provisions of the Plan and any shareholder or regulatory approval which may be required, the Compensation Committee shall, from time to time by resolution, in its sole discretion, (a) designate the eligible director, eligible employee or consultant who may receive RSUs under the Plan, provided such person was not retained to provide investor relations activities, (b) fix the number of RSUs, if any, to be granted to each eligible director, eligible employee or consultant and the date or dates on which such RSUs shall be granted, (c) determine the relevant conditions, vesting provisions and the restriction period of such RSUs, and (d) determine any other terms and conditions applicable to the granted RSUs, which need not be identical and which, without limitation, may include non-competition provisions, subject to the terms and conditions prescribed in the Plan, in any RSU agreement, and any applicable rules of the Stock Exchange.

Subject to the vesting and other conditions and provisions in the Plan, all RSUs will vest in accordance with the terms of the RSU agreement entered into in respect of such RSUs, provided that no RSUs may vest for one year from the date of issuance.

Subject to the vesting and other conditions and provisions in the Plan and in the applicable RSU agreement, each RSU awarded to a Participant shall entitle the Participant to receive, on settlement, a cash payment equal to the market value of a common share, or, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, one common share or any combination of cash and common shares as the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion may determine, in each case less any applicable withholding taxes. For greater certainty, no Participant shall have any right to demand to be paid in, or receive, common shares in respect of any RSU, and, notwithstanding any discretion exercised by the Compensation Committee to settle any RSU, or a portion thereof, in the form of common shares, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to change such form of payment at any time until payment is actually made.

Persons who provide investor relations activities shall not receive any Awards other than Options.

The Compensation Committee shall have sole discretion to (a) determine if any vesting conditions with respect to a RSU, including any performance criteria or other vesting conditions contained in the applicable RSU agreement, have been met, (b) waive the vesting conditions applicable to RSUs (or deem them to be satisfied), and (c) extend the restriction period with respect to any grant of RSUs, provided that any such extension shall not result in the restriction period for such RSUs extending beyond the RSU Outside Expiry Date (as defined below) and, provided, further, that any such determination, waiver or extension to an RSU granted to an eligible director, eligible employee or consultant who is a U.S. person shall be made in accordance with Section 409A of the U.S. Code. The Company shall communicate to a Participant, as soon as reasonably practicable, the date on which all such applicable vesting conditions in respect of a grant of RSUs to the Participant have been satisfied, waived or deemed satisfied and such RSUs have vested (the "Vesting Date").

Dividend Equivalents

Dividend equivalents may, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, be awarded as a bonus for services rendered in the year awarded in respect of unvested RSUs in a Participant's account on the same basis as cash dividends declared and paid on common shares as if the Participant was a shareholder of record of common shares on the relevant record date. Dividend equivalents, if any, will be credited to the Participant's account in additional RSUs, the number of which shall be equal to a fraction where the numerator is the product of (a) the number of RSUs in such Participant's account on the date that dividends are paid multiplied by (b) the dividend paid per common share and the denominator of which is the market value of a common share calculated as of the date that dividends are paid. Any additional RSUs credited to a Participant's account as a dividend equivalent shall be subject to the same terms and conditions (including vesting, restriction periods and expiry) as the RSUs in respect of which such additional RSUs are credited.

In the event that the Participant's applicable RSUs do not vest, all dividend equivalents, if any, associated with such RSUs will be forfeited by the Participant.

In the event that the limits set forth in the Plan prevent the Company from satisfying its obligations under any dividend equivalent, or the Company elects in its sole and absolute discretion, the Company shall be permitted to settle any dividend equivalent issued under the Plan in cash. Any such cash payments shall be calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs to be redeemed for cash by the market value per common share as at the settlement date.

Black-out Periods

If the expiry date of an Option fall falls within a blackout period or within ten business days after the expiry of a blackout period, then the expiry date of the Option will be the date which is ten business days after the expiry of the blackout period.

Expiry Date of Awards

Options

The Option Period for each Option shall be such period of time as shall be determined by the Compensation Committee, subject to amendment by an employment contract, provided that in no event shall an Option Period exceed ten years. Disinterested shareholder approval shall be required for the extension of any Option Period if the optionee is an insider of the Company at the time of the proposed amendment to the Option Period.

RSUs

No payment, whether in cash or in common shares, shall be made in respect of the settlement of any RSUs later than December 15^th of the third (3^rd) calendar year following the end of the calendar year in respect of which such RSU is granted (the "RSU Outside Expiry Date").

Termination of Employment or Service

Options

If a Participant shall:

(a) cease to be a director or of a designated affiliate, as the case may be (and is not or does not continue to be an employee thereof), for any reason (other than death); or

(b) cease to be employed by, or provide services to, the Company or the designated affiliates (and is not or does not continue to be a director or officer thereof), or any corporation engaged to provide services to the Company or the designated affiliates, for any reason (other than death) or shall receive notice from the Company or any designated affiliate of the termination of their employment contract;

(the earliest to occur of any of the foregoing events being referred to herein as a "Termination"), except as otherwise provided in any employment contract, such Participant may, but only within the 90 days next succeeding such Termination (or, subject to the limitations set forth below, such other period of time as may be determined by the Board), exercise the Options to the extent that such Participant was entitled to exercise such Options at the date of such Termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any employment contract, in no event shall such right extend beyond the Option Period or one year from the date of Termination, whichever is earlier.

RSUs

If a Participant shall:

(a) cease to be a director or of a designated affiliate, as the case may be (and is not or does not continue to be an employee thereof), for any reason (other than death); or

(b) cease to be employed by, or provide services to, the Company (and is not or does not continue to be a director or officer thereof), or any corporation engaged to provide services to the Company, for any reason (other than death) or shall receive notice from the Company of the termination of their employment contract;

(the earliest to occur of any of the foregoing events being referred to as a Termination), the Participant's participation in the Plan shall be terminated immediately, all RSUs credited to such Participant's account that have not vested shall be forfeited and cancelled, and the Participant's rights that relate to such Participant's unvested RSUs shall be forfeited and cancelled on the date of such Termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, instead accelerates the vesting or waives vesting conditions with respect to all or some portion of outstanding unvested RSUs, the date of such action is the Vesting Date.

If a Participant or, in the case of a consultant which is not an individual, the primary individual providing services to the Company on behalf of the consultant, shall die, any unvested RSUs in the Participant's account as at the date of such death relating to a restriction period in progress shall become immediately forfeited and cancelled. For greater certainty, where a Participant's employment or service relationship with the Company is terminated as a result of death following the satisfaction of all vesting conditions in respect of particular RSUs but before receipt of the corresponding distribution or payment in respect of such RSUs, the Participant shall remain entitled to such distribution or payment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, instead accelerates the vesting or waives vesting conditions with respect to all or some portion of outstanding unvested RSUs, the date of such action is the Vesting Date.

Change of Control

Under the Plan, in the event of a potential change in control, except as otherwise provided in the applicable resolution granting an Award, the Board shall provide for the treatment of each outstanding Award as it determines in its sole discretion, which treatment need not be uniform for all Participants and/or Awards and which may include, without limitation, one or more of the following:

(a) (i) continuation of such Awards or (ii) conversion of such Awards into, or substitution or replacement of such Awards with, an Award with respect to shares of the successor corporation (or a parent or subsidiary thereof) with substantially equivalent terms and value as such Awards (which value as at immediately following such change in control shall not exceed the intrinsic value of any such Option as at immediately prior to such change in control), effected in accordance with Sections 409A and 424 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to the extent applicable; and/or

(b) acceleration of the vesting and the right to exercise such Option or settle such RSU as at immediately, or during a specified period, prior to such change in control, and the termination of such Option to the extent such Option is not timely exercised. If the change in control is not completed within the time specified therein (as the same may be extended), the Awards which vest pursuant to the Plan shall be returned by us to the Participant and, if exercised or settled, as applicable, the common shares issued on such exercise or settlement shall be reinstated as authorized but unissued common shares and the original terms applicable to such Awards shall be reinstated.

(c) for purposes of the application of the change in control provisions to any outstanding Award, if such Award is subject to performance criteria (including any performance vesting conditions), the level of attainment of such criteria shall be determined by the Board in its sole discretion, including, without limitation, by deeming such criteria attained at the applicable target or maximum level regardless of actual performance, or measuring the attainment of such criteria based on actual performance through such change in control or a specified date prior thereto.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the payment of deferred compensation to any U.S. taxpayer, change in control shall be limited to a change in control event as defined in Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-3(i)(5) prescribed pursuant to Section 409A of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Non-Transferability of Awards

No rights under the Plan and no Award granted pursuant to the Plan are assignable or transferable by any Participant other than pursuant to a will or by the laws of descent and distribution.

Amendments to the Equity Incentive Plan

Subject to certain restrictions, the Compensation Committee shall have the right without the approval of the shareholders of the Company to make certain amendments to the Plan, including but not limited to the following amendments:

(a) any amendment of a "housekeeping" nature, including, without limitation, amending the wording of any provision of the Plan for the purpose of clarifying the meaning of existing provisions or to correct or supplement any provision of the Plan that is inconsistent with any other provision of the Plan, correcting grammatical or typographical errors and amending the definitions contained within the Plan;

(b) any amendment to comply with the rules, policies, instruments and notices of any regulatory authority to which the Company is subject, including the Stock Exchange, or to otherwise comply with any applicable law or regulation;

(c) other than changes to the expiration date and the exercise price of any Award, any amendment, with the consent of the Participant, to the terms of any Award previously granted to such Participant under the Plan;

(d) any amendment to the provisions concerning the effect of the termination of any Participant's position, employment or services on such Participant's status under the Plan;

(e) any amendment to the categories of persons who are Participants; and

(f) any amendment respecting the administration or implementation of the Plan.

Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Compensation Committee also has the right, under the Plan with the approval of the shareholders of the Company by ordinary resolution including, if required by the applicable Stock Exchange, disinterested shareholder approval, to make amendments to the Plan not contemplated above, including, but not limited to:

(a) any change to the number of common shares issuable from treasury under the Plan, including an increase to the fixed maximum percentage or number of common shares or a change from a fixed maximum percentage of common shares to a fixed maximum number of common shares or vice versa;

(b) any amendment which reduces the exercise price of any Award, provided, however, that, for greater certainty, disinterested shareholder approval will be required for any amendment which reduces the exercise price of any Option if the Participant is an insider of the Company at the time of the proposed amendment;

(c) any amendment which extends the expiry date of an Award, or the restriction period of any RSU beyond the original expiry date or restriction period, except in the event of an extension due to a blackout period;

(d) any amendment which cancels any Award and replaces such Award with an Award which has a lower exercise price or other entitlement;

(e) any amendment which would permit Awards to be transferred or assigned by any Participant; and

(f) any amendments to the amendment provisions of the Plan.

Notwithstanding the foregoing: any amendment to the Plan shall be subject to the receipt of all required regulatory approvals including, without limitation, the approval of the Stock Exchange.

The following table sets forth the number of common shares to be issued, including upon exercise of outstanding convertible securities, pursuant to the Company's equity compensation plans, the weighted-average exercise price of such outstanding convertible securities and the number of common shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans as at December 31, 2023.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common shares as of February 26, 2025, by:

• each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common shares;

• each of our executive officers and directors; and

• all our executive officers and directors as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned by each shareholder is determined under rules issued by the SEC. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which a person has sole or shared voting power or investment power. Applicable percentage ownership is based on 11,922,561 common shares outstanding as of February 26, 2025. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, common shares subject to options, warrants, or other rights held by such person that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the date of this offering circular are considered outstanding, although these shares are not considered outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all common shares beneficially owned by them.

* Less than one percent.

(1) Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of our directors and executive officers is 300 Conshohocken State Rd., Suite 200, W. Conshohocken, PA 19428.

(2) Includes 793,173 common shares held by RBx Capital, LP, an entity controlled by Dr. Raza Bokhari. Dr. Raza Bokhari may be deemed the beneficial owner of securities held by RBx Capital, LP. Includes 262,500 common shares underlying stock options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the date of this offering circular.

(3) Includes 130,000 common shares underlying stock options and 24,000 common shares underlying Public Warrants that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the date of this offering circular.

(4) Includes 65,000 common shares underlying stock options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the date of this offering circular.

(5) Includes 80,000 common shares underlying stock options and 24,000 common shares underlying Public Warrants that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the date of this offering circular.

(6) Includes 28,750 common shares underlying stock options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the date of this offering circular.

(7) Includes 28,750 common shares underlying stock options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the date of this offering circular.

(8) Includes 28,750 common shares underlying stock options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the date of this offering circular.

(9) Includes 28,750 common shares underlying stock options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the date of this offering circular.

(10) Includes 28,750 common shares underlying stock options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the date of this offering circular.

(11) Includes 28,750 common shares underlying stock options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of the date of this offering circular.

(12) Includes 2,914,330 common shares held by Velocity Fund Partners, LP, an entity controlled by Dr. Kenneth R. Melani. Dr. Kenneth R. Melani’s address is 1100 Stonegate Manor, Cheswick, PA 15024.

(13) Includes 2,000,000 common shares held of record by 215 Capital Togo PHL Fund I, LP. Ajay Raju’s address is Two Liberty Place, 50 S. 16th Street, Suite 2710, Philadelphia, PA 19102.

(14) Includes 800,952 common shares held of record by SkinJect Partners LLC, an entity controlled by John Hathaway. John Hathaway’s address is 285 Kappa Drive, Suite 100, Pittsburgh, PA 15238.

Based upon a review of the information provided to us by our transfer agent, as of February 26, 2025, there were 153 record holders of our common shares and one holder of record of our Public Warrants. Such numbers do not include beneficial owners holding our securities through nominee names.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

SkinJect had an agreement with Velocity Fund Management, LLC ("VFM"), an affiliate of a shareholder of SkinJect, that provided for certain managerial positions to be filled from within VFM. These employees were not deemed employees of SkinJect, and VFM was responsible for the payment and provision of all wages, bonuses, commissions and benefits. Reimbursable salaries paid to VFM were approximately $180,000 during the years ended December 31, 2023 (2022 - $240,000) and were $nil during the periods ended June 30, 2024 (2023 - $60,000). The total amount of accounts payable to VFM was $nil as of December 31, 2023 (2022 - $20,000) and was $nil as of June 30, 2024. This agreement was terminated on September 29, 2023.

In December 2022, Velocity Fund Partners, LP, an affiliate of shareholders' of SkinJect invested $150,000 in a simple agreement for future equity (the "SAFE") issued by SkinJect.

On September 29, 2023, RBx, an entity controlled by Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Dr. Raza Bokhari, invested $1,600,000 in exchange for 800,000 common shares as part of the share issuance in connection with the RTO, and received 523,561 common shares upon conversion of promissory notes, which were consolidated into 261,780 common shares of the Company at the date of the RTO. RBx made an additional investment of $55,000 in Interactive in exchange for 1,375,000 common shares, which were consolidated into 54,525 common shares of the Company at the date of the RTO. An additional $405,000 was invested by directors and officers of the Company in exchange for 202,500 common shares as part of the share issuance in connection with the RTO, and another $55,000 was invested in Interactive by an officer of the Company in exchange for 1,375,000 common shares, which were consolidated into 54,525 common shares of the Company at the date of the RTO.

On October 18, 2023, the Company signed an agreement with RBx, that provides for certain managerial positions to be filled from within RBx. RBx is responsible for the payment and provision of all wages, bonuses, and benefits for these positions. Reimbursable salaries paid to RBx pursuant to this agreement are $100,000 per month during the year ended December 31, 2023 and $125,000 per month during the six months ended June 30, 2024. Reimbursable salaries paid to RBx were approximately $400,000 during the year ended December 31, 2023 (2022 - $nil) and were $375,000 and $675,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2024 (2023 - $nil and $nil). Additional expenses of $736,690, $38,770 and $124,178 were incurred by RBx on behalf of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2023 and in the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, respectively. The Company paid $970,740 to RBx during the year ended December 31, 2023 (2022 - $nil) and $491,885 and $830,028 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2024 (2023 - $nil and $nil). The total amount of accounts payable to RBx was $165,950 as of December 31, 2023 (2022 - $nil) and was $135,100 as of June 30, 2024 (December 31, 2023 - $165,950).

On May 3, 2024, certain directors and officers of the Company purchased $700,000 aggregate principal amount of 2025 Convertible Notes on the same terms as the investors who were not related to the Company. On June 28, 2024, the 2025 Convertible Notes were converted into common shares of the Company at a conversion price of US$4.00 per share. RBx purchased $300,000 principal amount of 2025 Convertible Notes. James Quinlan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, purchased $100,000 principal amount of 2025 Convertible Notes. Carolyn Bonner, President of the Company, purchased $25,000 principal amount of 2025 Convertible Notes.

On November 15, 2024, the Bokhari Trust, of which Dr. Raza Bokhari is a trustee, invested $594,000 in exchange for 144,000 units, consisting of 144,000 common shares and 144,000 Public Warrants as part of the Company’s initial public offering, James Quinlan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, invested $111,360 in exchange for 24,000 units, consisting of 24,000 common shares and 24,000 Public Warrants as part of the Company’s U.S. initial public offering and Edward Brennan, Chief Scientific Officer of the Company, invested $111,360 in exchange for 24,000 units, consisting of 24,000 common shares and 24,000 Public Warrants as part of the Company’s U.S. initial public offering.

Interests of Management and Others in Material Transactions

Other than as disclosed above, none of the directors or executive officers of Medicus, or persons or companies that beneficially own, or control or direct, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of our outstanding common shares, or any associate or affiliate of any of the foregoing, has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transactions in which Medicus has participated within the three years before the date of this offering circular, which has materially affected or is reasonably expected to materially affect Medicus.

Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers

As of the date of this offering circular, no director or officer of Medicus, or any associate or affiliate of any of them is indebted to Medicus, nor is any indebtedness of any such person the subject of a guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar arrangement or understanding provided by Medicus.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

The following description of the material terms of the securities of the Company includes a summary of specified provisions of the articles of incorporation (the "Articles") and the by-laws (the "Bylaws") of the Company. This description is qualified by reference to the Articles and the Bylaws, copies of which have been filed with the SEC as exhibits to this offering circular and are incorporated in this offering circular by reference.

Authorized Capital

The Company's authorized capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares and an unlimited number of preferred shares. The following is a summary of the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to the common shares and the preferred shares as set forth in the Articles and the Bylaws and certain related sections of the OBCA but does not purport to be complete. Reference should be made to the constating documents of the Company and the full text of their provisions for a complete description thereof.

Common Shares

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares, of which 11,922,561 are issued and outstanding as of the date of this offering circular.

The holders of the common shares are entitled to receive notice of and attend any meeting of the shareholders of the Company and are entitled to one vote for each common share held. Shareholders are entitled to receive dividends, if, as and when declared by the board of directors of the Company and to receive a proportionate share, on a per share basis, of the assets of the Company available for distribution in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company.

Provisions as to the modification, amendment or variation of the rights attached to the common shares are contained in the Bylaws.

Preferred Shares

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of preferred shares, of which no preferred shares are issued and outstanding as of the date of this offering circular.

Stock Options

As of the date of this offering circular, the Company had options outstanding to purchase approximately 1,185,000 common shares at exercise prices ranging from C$1.16 to C$4.84 and expiry dates ranging from October 24, 2028 to December 17, 2029. Of these options, 762,500 options may be exercised at C$1.16 and expire on October 24, 2028, 62,500 options may be exercised at C$4.80 and expire on March 5, 2029, 37,500 options may be exercised at C$4.84 and expire on March 28, 2029, 25,000 options may be exercised at C$3.34 and expire on June 25, 2029, 100,000 may be exercised at C$3.25 and expire on November 14, 2029, 50,000 may be exercised at C$2.70 and expire on November 20, 2029 and 230,000 options may be exercised at C$3.95 and expire on December 17, 2029.

Certain Important Provisions of the Articles and the Bylaws and the OBCA

The following is a summary of certain important provisions of the Articles and the Bylaws and certain related sections of the OBCA. Please note that this is only a summary and is not intended to be exhaustive. This summary is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the provisions of the Articles and the Bylaws and the OBCA.

Objects and Purposes of the Company

Our Articles do not contain and are not required to contain a description of our objects and purposes. There is no restriction contained in our Articles on the business that we may carry on.

Voting on Certain Proposal, Arrangement, Contract or Compensation by Directors

Other than as disclosed below, neither our Articles nor our Bylaws restrict our directors' power to: (a) vote on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which the directors are materially interested; or (b) to vote with regard to compensation payable to themselves or any other members of their body in the absence of an independent quorum.

Our Bylaws provide that a director who: (a) is a party to; or (b) is a director or an officer of, or has a material interest in, any person who is a party to; a material contract or transaction or proposed material contract or transaction with us shall disclose the nature and extent of such director's interest at the time and in the manner provided by the OBCA. Any such contract or transaction or proposed material contract or transaction shall be referred to our board of directors or shareholders for approval in accordance with the OBCA even if such contract or proposed material contract or transaction is one that in the ordinary course of our business would not require approval by our board of directors or shareholders, and a director interested in a contract or transaction so referred to our board of directors shall not attend any part of a meeting of our board of directors during which the contract or transaction is discussed and shall not vote on any resolution to approve such contract or transaction except as provided by the OBCA.

Subject to our Articles and any unanimous shareholder agreement, our directors shall be paid such remuneration for their services as our board of directors may from time to time determine. Our directors shall also be entitled to be reimbursed for travelling and other expenses properly incurred by them in attending meetings of our board of directors or any committee thereof. Nothing in our Bylaws shall preclude any director from serving the Company in any other capacity and receiving remuneration therefor in that capacity.

The OBCA provides that a director who: (a) is a party to a material contract or transaction or proposed material contract or transaction with the Company; or (b) is a director or an officer of, or has a material interest in, any person who is a party to a material contract or transaction or proposed material contract or transaction with the Company, shall not attend any part of a meeting of directors during which the contract or transaction is discussed and shall not vote on any resolution to approve the contract or transaction unless the contract or transaction is one: (i) relating primarily to such director's remuneration as a director of the Company or one of our affiliates; (ii) for indemnity or insurance for the benefit of such director in his or her capacity as a director; or (iii) with one of our affiliates.

Where a material contract is made or a material transaction is entered into between us and a director of the Company, or between us and another person of which a director of the Company is a director or officer or in which he or she has a material interest: (a) the director is not accountable to us or our shareholders for any profit or gain realized from the contract or transaction; and (b) the contract or transaction is neither void nor voidable, by reason only of that relationship or by reason only that the director is present at or is counted to determine the presence of a quorum at the meeting of directors that authorized the contract or transaction, if the director disclosed his or her interest in accordance with the OBCA and the contract or transaction was reasonable and fair to us at the time it was approved.

Borrowing Powers of Directors

Our Bylaws provide that, if authorized by our directors, we may, subject to our Articles: (i) borrow money upon our credit; (ii) issue, reissue, sell, pledge or hypothecate bonds, debentures, notes or other evidences of indebtedness of the Company, whether secured or unsecured; (iii) give a guarantee on behalf of the Company to secure performance of any present or future indebtedness, liability or obligation of any person; and (iv) mortgage, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise create a security interest in all or any currently owned or subsequently acquired real or personal, movable or immovable, property of the Company including book debts, rights, powers, franchises and undertakings, to secure any such bonds, debentures, notes or other evidences of indebtedness or guarantee or any other present or future indebtedness, liability or obligation of the Company.

Amendment to the borrowing powers described above requires an amendment to the Articles and the Bylaws. Our Bylaws do not contain any provisions in connection with amending the Bylaws. The OBCA provides that our board of directors may by resolution, make, amend or repeal any Bylaws that regulate our business or affairs and that our board of directors shall submit such Bylaws, amendment or repeal to our shareholders at the next meeting of shareholders and the shareholders may confirm, reject or amend the Bylaw, amendment or repeal.

Qualifications of Directors

Under our Bylaws and the OBCA, the following persons are disqualified from being a director of the Company: (i) a person who is less than 18 years of age; (ii) a person who has been found under the Substitute Decisions Act, 1992 or under the Mental Health Act to be incapable of managing property or who has been found to be incapable by a court in Canada or elsewhere; (iii) a person who is not an individual; and (iv) a person who has the status of a bankrupt. Subject to our Articles, a director is not required to be a shareholder of the Company. At least 25% of our directors must be resident Canadian and if we have less than four directors, at least one director must be a resident Canadian.

Procedures to Change the Rights of Shareholders

The rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to our shares are contained in our Articles and such rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions may be changed by amending our Articles. In order to amend our Articles, the OBCA requires a resolution to be passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote thereon. In addition, if we resolve to make particular types of amendments to our Articles, a holder of our shares may dissent with regard to such resolution and, if such shareholder so elects, we would have to pay such shareholder the fair value of the shares held by the shareholder in respect of which the shareholder dissents, determined as of the close of business on the day before the resolution was adopted. The types of amendments that would be subject to dissent rights include without limitation: (i) to add, remove or change restrictions on the issue, transfer or ownership of shares of a class or series of our shares; (ii) to add, remove or change any restriction upon the business that we may carry on or upon the powers that we may exercise; (iii) to amalgamate with another corporation in accordance with the OBCA; (iv) to continue under the laws of another jurisdiction in accordance with the OBCA; and (v) to sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of our property other than in the ordinary course of our business in accordance with the OBCA.

Meetings

Each director holds office until our next annual meeting or until his office is earlier vacated in accordance with our Articles, Bylaws or with the provisions of the OBCA. A director appointed or elected to fill a vacancy on our board also holds office until our next annual meeting.

Annual meetings of our shareholders must be held at such time in each year not more than 15 months after the last annual meeting, as our board of directors may determine. Notice of the time and place of a meeting of shareholders must be sent not less than twenty-one days and not more than fifty days, before the meeting.

Meetings of our shareholders shall be held at our registered office or, if our board of directors shall so determine, at some other place in Ontario or, at some place outside Ontario if all the shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting so agree.

Our Board, the Chair of our Board or our CEO shall have the power to call a special meeting of our shareholders at any time.

The OBCA provides that our shareholders may requisition a special meeting in accordance with the OBCA. The OBCA provides that the holders of not less than five percent of our issued shares that carry the right to vote at a meeting sought to be held may requisition our directors to call a special meeting of shareholders for the purposes stated in the requisition.

The quorum for the transaction of business at any meeting of our shareholders will not be less than 33 1/3 of the outstanding common shares.

Limitations on Ownership of Securities

Except as provided in the Investment Canada Act (Canada), there are no limitations specific to the rights of non-Canadians to hold or vote our shares under the laws of Canada or Ontario, or in our charter documents.

Change in Control

There are no provisions in our Articles or Bylaws that would have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company, and that would operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving the Company or our subsidiaries.

Ownership Threshold

Neither the Articles nor the Bylaws contain any provisions governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed. In addition, securities legislation in Canada requires that we disclose in our proxy information circular for our annual meeting and certain other disclosure documents filed by us under such legislation, holders who beneficially own more than 10% of our issued and outstanding shares.

U.S. federal securities laws require us to disclose, in our annual reports on Form 10-K, holders who own 5% or more of our issued and outstanding voting shares.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Our registrar and transfer agent for the common shares is Odyssey Trust Company, 702 - 67 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5E 1J8, Canada, telephone: 1-888-290-1175.

Public Warrants

As of February 26, 2025, we had 1,115,500 Public Warrants outstanding. Each Public Warrant is exercisable for one common share at an exercise price of $4.64 per share. The Public Warrants were issued on November 15, 2024 in connection with our initial public offering and are exercisable at any time for a period of five years following the date of issuance, expiring at 5:00 pm EST on November 15, 2029.

The number of Public Warrants outstanding, and the exercise price of those securities, will be adjusted proportionately in the event of a consolidation or share split of our common shares, a recapitalization or reclassification of our common shares, payment of dividends or distributions in common shares to our common share holders, or similar transactions. In the event that the Company effects a rights offering to its common share holders or a pro rata distribution of its assets among its common share holders, then the holders of the Public Warrants will have the right to participate in such distribution and rights offering to the extent of their pro rata share of the Company's outstanding common shares assuming they owned the number of common shares issuable upon the exercise of their Public Warrants. In the event of a "Fundamental Transaction" by the Company, such as a merger or consolidation of it with another company, the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company's assets in one or a series of related transactions, a purchase offer, tender offer or exchange offer, or any reclassification, reorganization or recapitalization of the common shares, then the Public Warrant holders will have the right to receive, for each common share issuable upon the exercise of a Public Warrant, at the option of the holder, the number of common shares of the successor or acquiring corporation or of the Company, if it is the surviving corporation, and any additional consideration payable as a result of the Fundamental Transaction, that would have been issued or conveyed to the Public Warrant holder had the holder exercised the Public Warrant immediately preceding the closing of the Fundamental Transaction.

The Company will promptly notify the Public Warrant holders in writing of any adjustment to the exercise price or to the number of the outstanding Public Warrants, declaration of a dividend or other distribution, a special non‑recurring cash dividend on or a redemption of the common shares, the authorization of a rights offering, the approval of the share holders required for any proposed reclassification of the common shares, a consolidation or merger by the Company, sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, any compulsory share exchange, or the authorization of any voluntary or involuntary dissolution, liquidation, or winding up of the Company.

If at the time of exercise there is no effective registration statement registering, or the prospectus contained therein is not available for the issuance of the underlying shares to the holder, in lieu of making the cash payment otherwise contemplated to be made to us upon such exercise in payment of the aggregate exercise price, the holder may elect instead to receive upon such exercise (either in whole or in part) the net number of common shares determined according to a formula set forth in the full text of the Public Warrant.

No fractional shares or scrip representing fractional shares shall be issued upon the exercise of the Public Warrants. As to any fraction of a share which the holder would otherwise be entitled to purchase upon such exercise, we shall, at our election, either pay a cash adjustment in respect of such fraction in an amount equal to such fraction multiplied by the exercise price of the Public Warrants or round the number of shares to be received by the holder up to the next whole number.

The Public Warrants are issued in registered form under a Warrant Agency Agreement between Odyssey Transfer and Trust Company ("Warrant Agent") and the Company. The Public Warrants were initially be represented only by one or more global warrants deposited with the Warrant Agent, as custodian on behalf of The Depository Trust Company (DTC), and registered in the name of Cede & Co., a nominee of DTC, or as otherwise directed by DTC.

The Public Warrants contain a contractual provision stating that all questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of the Public Warrants are governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law.

This summary of the Public Warrants is not complete, and is qualified in its entirety by, the full text of the Public Warrant and Warrant Agency Agreement, copies of which have been filed with the SEC as exhibits to this offering circular and incorporated in this offering circular by reference.

Warrants

Upon completion of this offering we expect to have 2,222,222 warrants outstanding. Each warrant will be exercisable for one common share at an exercise price of 100% of the price of each unit sold in the offering and will be exercisable at any time up for a period of five years following the date of issuance. We are also registering the common shares issuable from time to time upon exercise of the warrants offered hereby.

The number of warrants outstanding, and the exercise price of those securities, will be adjusted proportionately in the event of a consolidation or share split of our common shares, a recapitalization or reclassification of our common shares, payment of dividends or distributions in common shares to our common share holders, or similar transactions. In the event that the Company effects a rights offering to its common share holders or a pro rata distribution of its assets among its common share holders, then the holders of warrants will have the right to participate in such distribution and rights offering to the extent of their pro rata share of the Company's outstanding common shares assuming they owned the number of common shares issuable upon the exercise of their warrants. In the event of a "Fundamental Transaction" by the Company, such as a merger or consolidation of it with another company, the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company's assets in one or a series of related transactions, a purchase offer, tender offer or exchange offer, or any reclassification, reorganization or recapitalization of the common shares, then the warrant holders will have the right to receive, for each common share issuable upon the exercise of a warrant, at the option of the holder, the number of common shares of the successor or acquiring corporation or of the Company, if it is the surviving corporation, and any additional consideration payable as a result of the Fundamental Transaction, that would have been issued or conveyed to the warrant holder had the holder exercised the warrant immediately preceding the closing of the Fundamental Transaction.

The Company will promptly notify the warrant holders in writing of any adjustment to the exercise price or to the number of the outstanding warrants, declaration of a dividend or other distribution, a special non-recurring cash dividend on or a redemption of the common shares, the authorization of a rights offering, the approval of the share holders required for any proposed reclassification of the common shares, a consolidation or merger by the Company, sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, any compulsory share exchange, or the authorization of any voluntary or involuntary dissolution, liquidation, or winding up of the Company.

If at the time of exercise there is no qualified offering statement or effective registration statement, or the offering circular or prospectus, as applicable, contained therein is not available for the issuance of the underlying shares to the holder, in lieu of making the cash payment otherwise contemplated to be made to us upon such exercise in payment of the aggregate exercise price, the holder may elect instead to receive upon such exercise (either in whole or in part) the net number of common shares determined according to a formula set forth in the full text of the Form of Warrant.

No fractional shares or scrip representing fractional shares shall be issued upon the exercise of the warrants. As to any fraction of a share which the holder would otherwise be entitled to purchase upon such exercise, we shall, at our election, either pay a cash adjustment in respect of such fraction in an amount equal to such fraction multiplied by the exercise price of the warrants or round the number of shares to be received by the holder up to the next whole number.

The Warrants will contain a contractual provision stating that all questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of the Warrants are governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law.

This summary of the Warrants is not complete, and is qualified in its entirety by, the full text of the Form of Warrant and Form of Warrant Agency Agreement, copies of which have been filed with the SEC as exhibits to this offering circular and incorporated in this offering circular by reference.

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

Upon completion of this offering, we will have 14,144,783 common shares outstanding (assuming that no warrants are exercised). All of the common shares sold in this offering will be freely transferable by persons other than by our "affiliates" without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act. Sales of substantial amounts of our common share in the public market could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common share. Prior to this offering, there has been a limited public market for our common shares and no public market in the United States for our warrants.

Additionally, as of the date of this offering circular, we have options outstanding to purchase approximately 1,185,000 common shares, at exercise prices ranging from C$1.16 to C$4.84 and expiry dates ranging from October 24, 2028 to December 17, 2029. The exercise price of the majority of these options is significantly below our current market price. As of the date of this offering circular, we also have 1,115,500 Public Warrants outstanding. Each Public Warrant is exercisable for one common share at an exercise price of $4.64 per share.

Equity Incentive Plans

Following the completion of the offering, we may file one or more registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register the offer and sale of any common shares reserved for issuance under our equity incentive plans that may be in effect from time to time. Such registration statements would become effective immediately upon filing. Shares covered by these registration statements will then be eligible for sale in the public markets, subject to vesting restrictions and any applicable holdings periods, any applicable lock-up agreements described below and Rule 144 limitations applicable to affiliates.

Rule 144

Certain of our common shares that will be outstanding upon the completion of this offering, other than those common shares sold in this offering, are "restricted securities" as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act and may be sold publicly in the United States only if they are subject to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirement such as that provided by Rule 144 under the Securities Act. In general, beginning 90 days after the date of this offering circular, a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who at the time of a sale is not, and has not been during the three months preceding the sale, an affiliate of ours and has beneficially owned our restricted securities for at least six months will be entitled to sell the restricted securities without registration under the Securities Act, subject only to the availability of current public information about us, and will be entitled to sell restricted securities beneficially owned for at least one year without restriction. Persons who are our affiliates and have beneficially owned our restricted securities for at least six months may sell a number of restricted securities within any three-month period that does not exceed the greater of the following:

Sales by our affiliates under Rule 144 are also subject to certain requirements relating to manner of sale, notice and the availability of current public information about us.

Rule 701

In general, under Rule 701 of the Securities Act as currently in effect, each of our employees, consultants or advisors who acquired our common share from us in connection with a compensatory stock plan or other written agreement executed prior to the completion of our U.S. IPO is eligible to resell those common shares in reliance on Rule 144, but without compliance with some of the restrictions, including the holding period, contained in Rule 144. However, the Rule 701 shares would remain subject to lock-up arrangements and would only become eligible for sale when the lock-up period expires.

Regulation S

 Regulation S provides generally that sales made in offshore transactions are not subject to the registration or prospectus-delivery requirements of the Securities Act.

Lock-Up Agreements

All of our directors and executive officers have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell or otherwise dispose of common shares or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for common shares for a period of 90 days after the date of this offering circular without the prior written consent of Maxim Group LLC.

CERTAIN MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

The following discussion describes certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares and warrants, which we refer to collectively as our securities. Because the components of a Unit are issued separately in this offering, a holder that acquires Units in this offering should be treated, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as acquiring common shares and a warrant. This discussion applies to holders that purchase securities pursuant to this offering and hold such securities as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, assets held for investment purposes). This discussion is based on the Code, U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect.

This discussion does not address all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to specific holders in light of their particular circumstances or to holders subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law such as certain financial institutions, thrifts, insurance companies, broker-dealers and traders in securities or other persons that generally mark their securities to market for U.S. federal income tax purposes, tax-exempt entities, governmental organizations, retirement plans, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, certain former citizens or residents of the United States, holders who hold securities as part of a "straddle", "hedge", "conversion transaction", "synthetic security" or integrated investment, holders whose "functional currency" (as defined in the Code) is not the U.S. dollar, corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, persons who acquired our shares through the exercise or cancellation of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for their services, partnerships and other pass-through entities (or arrangements treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes), and investors in such pass-through entities. In addition, this discussion does not address the tax treatment of partnerships (or entities or arrangements that are treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes) or persons that hold our securities through such partnerships. If a partnership, including any entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holds our securities, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Such partners and partnerships are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our securities. This discussion does not address any U.S. state or local or non-U.S. tax consequences or any U.S. federal estate, gift or alternative minimum tax consequences or the requirements of Section 451 of the Code with respect to conforming the timing of income accruals to financial statements. We have not requested, and will not request, a ruling from the IRS with respect to any of the U.S. federal income tax consequences described below, and as a result there can be no assurance that the IRS will not disagree with or challenge any of the conclusions described herein.

As used in this discussion, the term "U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of securities that is, (1) an individual who is a citizen or resident alien of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (2) a corporation (or entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia, (3) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source or (4) a trust (x) with respect to which a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions or (y) that has elected under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a domestic trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and the term "Non-U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of our securities that is neither a U.S. Holder nor a partnership or an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

The following discussion is for general information only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any holder or prospective holder of securities and no opinion or representation with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences to any such holder or prospective holder is made. Persons considering an investment in securities are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the particular tax consequences applicable to them relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of securities, including the applicability of U.S. federal, state and local tax laws and non-U.S. tax laws.

Treatment as a Domestic Corporation for U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes

Even though we are organized as a corporation existing under the laws of Ontario, as a result of the Business Combination, we believe we are treated as a domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 7874 of the Code. As such, we will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax as if we were organized under the laws of the United States or a state thereof. The remaining discussion contained in this "U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations" assumes that we will be treated as a domestic corporation for all U.S. federal income tax purposes.

General Treatment of Units

The acquisition of a Unit should be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as the acquisition of one common share and one warrant. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, each holder that acquires a Unit must allocate the purchase price paid by such holder for such Unit between the common share and the warrant based on the relative fair market value of each at the time of issuance. A holder's initial tax basis in the common share and the warrant included in each Unit should equal the portion of the purchase price of the Unit allocated thereto.

Tax Considerations Applicable to U.S. Holders

Distributions on Common Shares

If we pay distributions or make constructive distributions (other than certain distributions of our stock or rights to acquire our stock) to U.S. Holders, such distributions generally will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid or deemed paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will constitute a return of capital that will be applied against and reduce (but not below zero) the U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in our common shares. Any remaining excess will be treated as gain realized on the sale or other disposition of the common shares and will be treated as described under "-Dispositions" below.

Dividends we pay to a U.S. Holder that is taxable as a corporation will generally qualify for the dividends received deduction if the required holding period is satisfied. Dividends we pay to a non-corporate U.S. Holder will generally constitute "qualified dividends" which are subject to tax at preferential long-term capital gains rates provided certain holding period and other requirements are met. If the holding period requirements are not satisfied, a corporation may not be able to qualify for the dividends received deduction and would have taxable income equal to the entire dividend amount, and non-corporate holders may be subject to tax on such dividend at ordinary income tax rates instead of the preferential rates that apply to qualified dividend income.

If a U.S. Holder is subject to Canadian withholding tax on dividends paid on common shares to the U.S. Holder, the dividends will be considered U.S. source income, which could limit the ability of a U.S. Holder to claim a foreign tax credit for the Canadian withholding taxes imposed in respect of such a dividend. See "-Foreign Tax Credit Limitations" below.

Dispositions of a Common Share

A U.S. Holder generally will recognize gain or loss on the sale, taxable exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares. Any such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder's holding period for the common shares so disposed of exceeds one year. The amount of gain or loss recognized will generally be equal to the difference between (1) the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property received in such disposition and (2) the U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in its common shares so disposed of. A U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in its common shares will generally equal the U.S. Holder's acquisition cost for such common shares (or, in the case of common shares received upon exercise of a warrant, the U.S. Holder's initial basis for such common shares, as discussed below), less any prior distributions treated as a return of capital. Long-term capital gains recognized by non-corporate U.S. Holders are generally eligible for reduced rates of tax. If the U.S. Holder's holding period for the common shares so disposed of is one year or less, any gain on a sale or other taxable disposition of the shares would be subject to short-term capital gain treatment and would be taxed at ordinary income tax rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.

To the extent a U.S. Holder pays any Canadian tax on a sale, exchange or disposition of our common shares, a U.S. foreign tax credit may not be available. See "-Foreign Tax Credit Limitations" below.

Exercise of a Warrant

Except as discussed below with respect to the cashless exercise of a warrant, a U.S. Holder generally will not recognize taxable gain or loss upon exercise of a warrant for cash. The U.S. Holder's initial tax basis in our common shares received upon the exercise of the warrant will generally be an amount equal to the sum of the U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the warrant and the exercise price of such warrant. A U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in a warrant would generally equal the U.S. Holder's acquisition cost of the warrant (i.e., the portion of the U.S. Holder's purchase price for a Unit that is allocated to the warrant, as described under "General Treatment of Units"), increased by the amount of any constructive dividends included in income by such U.S. Holder, as described under "Possible Constructive Distributions." It is unclear whether a U.S. Holder's holding period for the common shares received upon exercise of the warrant would commence on the date of exercise of the warrant or the day following the date of exercise of the warrant; however, in either case the holding period will not include the period during which the U.S. Holder held the warrants.

The tax consequences of a cashless exercise of a warrant are not clear under current tax law. A cashless exercise may be nontaxable, either because the exercise is not a realization event or because the exercise is treated as a recapitalization for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In either situation, a U.S. Holder's initial tax basis in the common shares received would generally equal the holder's adjusted tax basis in the warrant exchanged therefor. If the cashless exercise were treated as not being a realization event, it is unclear whether a U.S. Holder's holding period for the common shares would commence on the date of exercise of the warrant or the day following the date of exercise of the warrant. If, however, the cashless exercise were treated as a recapitalization, the holding period of the common shares would include the holding period of the warrant. Although we expect a U.S. Holder's cashless exercise of our warrants (including after we provide notice of our intent to redeem warrants for cash) to be treated as a recapitalization, a cashless exercise could alternatively be treated as a taxable exchange in which gain or loss would be recognized.

It is also possible that a cashless exercise could be treated in part as a taxable exchange in which gain or loss is recognized. In such event, a portion of the warrants to be exercised on a cashless basis could, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, be deemed to have been surrendered in consideration for the exercise price of the remaining warrants, which would be deemed to be exercised. For this purpose, a U.S. Holder would be deemed to have surrendered a number of warrants having an aggregate value equal to the exercise price for the total number of warrants deemed exercised. The U.S. Holder would recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between exercise price for the total number of warrants deemed exercised and the U.S. Holder's tax basis in the warrants deemed surrendered. Such gain or loss would be long-term or short-term depending on the U.S. Holder's holding period in the warrants deemed surrendered. In this case, a U.S. Holder's initial tax basis in the common shares received would equal the sum of the U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the warrants deemed exercised and the exercise price of such warrants. It is unclear whether a U.S. Holder's holding period for the common shares would commence on the date of exercise of the warrant or the day following the date of exercise of the warrant; in either case, the holding period would not include the period during which the U.S. Holder held the warrant.

Dispositions of a Warrant

Upon a sale, exchange (other than by exercise), or expiration of a warrant, a U.S. Holder will recognize taxable gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between (1) the amount realized upon such disposition or expiration and (2) the U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the warrant. Such gain or loss generally will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the warrant is held by the U.S. Holder for more than one year at the time of such disposition or expiration.

If a warrant is allowed to lapse unexercised, a U.S. Holder will generally recognize a capital loss equal to such holder's adjusted tax basis in the warrant. Any such loss generally will be a capital loss and will be long-term capital loss if the warrant is held for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain limitations.

Distributions on Warrants

We may make distributions on warrants in certain circumstances, as described above under "Description of Securities ‑Public Warrants" and "Description of Securities -Warrants." We expect any distributions on the warrants to be taxable to a U.S. Holder as ordinary income at the time the U.S. Holder actually or constructively receives such distribution. However, the treatment of distributions on warrants is not entirely clear and U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving distributions on the warrants.

Possible Constructive Distributions

The terms of the warrants provide for an adjustment to the number of common shares for which the warrant may be exercised or to the exercise price of the warrant in certain events. An adjustment which has the effect of preventing dilution generally should not be a taxable event. Nevertheless, a U.S. Holder of warrants would be treated as receiving a constructive distribution from us if, for example, the adjustment increases the holder's proportionate interest in our assets or earnings and profits (e.g., through an increase in the number of common shares for which the warrant may be exercised or an adjustment to the exercise price of the warrant) as a result of a taxable dividend to the holders of our common shares. Such constructive distribution would be subject to tax as described above under "Distributions" in the same manner as if such U.S. Holder received a cash distribution from us on common shares equal to the fair market value of such increased interest.

Receipt of Foreign Currency

The gross amount of any payment in a currency other than U.S. dollars will be included by each U.S. Holder in income in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the day such U.S. Holder actually or constructively receives the payment in accordance with its regular method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars at that time. If the non-U.S. currency is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of the payment, the U.S. Holder should not be required to recognize any foreign currency gain or loss with respect to the receipt of non-U.S. currency. If, instead, the foreign currency is converted at a later date, any currency gains or losses resulting from the conversion of the foreign currency will be treated as U.S. source ordinary income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own U.S. tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving, owning, and disposing of foreign currency.

Foreign Tax Credit Limitations

Because the Company is subject to tax both as a U.S. domestic corporation and as a Canadian corporation, a U.S. Holder may pay, through withholding, Canadian tax, as well as U.S. federal income tax, with respect to dividends paid on its common shares. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder may elect for any taxable year to receive either a credit or a deduction for foreign income taxes paid by the holder during the year. Complex limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including a general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of a taxpayer's U.S. federal income tax that the taxpayer's foreign source taxable income bears to the taxpayer's worldwide taxable income. In applying this limitation, items of income and deduction must be classified, under complex rules, as either foreign source or U.S. source.

The status of the Company as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes will cause dividends paid by the Company to be treated as U.S. source rather than foreign source income for this purpose. As a result, a foreign tax credit may be unavailable for any Canadian tax paid on dividends received from the Company. Similarly, to the extent a sale or disposition of common shares by a U.S. Holder results in Canadian tax payable by the U.S. Holder (for example, because the common shares constitute taxable Canadian property within the meaning of the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the regulations thereunder (the “Tax Act”), a U.S. foreign tax credit may be unavailable to the U.S. Holder for such Canadian tax. In each case, however, the U.S. Holder may be able to take a deduction for the U.S. Holder's Canadian tax paid, provided that the U.S. Holder has not elected to credit other foreign taxes during the same taxable year. The foreign tax credit rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder is urged to consult its own tax advisor regarding these rules.

Additional Tax on Net Investment Income

U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts are required to pay an additional 3.8% tax on the lesser of (1) the U.S. Holder's "net investment income" for the relevant taxable year and (2) the excess of the U.S. Holder's modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year over a certain threshold. A U.S. Holder's "net investment income" generally includes, among other things, dividends and net gains from disposition of property (other than property held in the ordinary course of the conduct of a trade or business).

Accordingly, dividends on and capital gain from the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares may be subject to this additional tax. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the additional tax on passive income.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding.

In general, information reporting requirements may apply to distributions paid to a U.S. Holder and to the proceeds of the sale or other disposition of our common shares, unless the U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient. Backup withholding may apply to such payments if a U.S. Holder does not establish, in the manner provided by law, an exemption from backup withholding, or fails to provide a correct taxpayer identification number or make any other required certifications.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or credit against U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding their qualification for an exemption from backup withholding and the procedures for obtaining such an exemption.

Tax Considerations Applicable to Non-U.S. Holders

Distributions on Common Shares

Distributions of cash or property that we pay in respect of our common shares will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Subject to the discussions below under "U.S. Trade or Business Income," "Information Reporting and Backup Withholding" and "FATCA," Non-U.S. Holders generally will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a 30% rate, or at a reduced rate prescribed by an applicable income tax treaty, on any dividends received in respect of our common shares. If the amount of the distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such excess first will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of the Non-U.S. Holder's tax basis in our common shares, and thereafter will be treated as capital gain and will be treated as described below under "Dispositions." However, except to the extent that we elect (or the paying agent or other intermediary through which a Non-U.S. Holder holds its common shares elects) otherwise, we (or the intermediary) must generally withhold at the applicable rate on the entire distribution, in which case the Non-U.S. Holder would be entitled to a refund from the IRS for the withholding tax on the portion, if any, of the distribution that exceeded our current and accumulated earnings and profits.

In order to obtain a reduced rate of U.S. federal withholding tax under an applicable income tax treaty, Non-U.S. Holders will be required to provide a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN or Form W-8BEN-E (or, in each case, a successor form) certifying the Non-U.S. Holder's entitlement to benefits under such treaty. If a Non-U.S. Holder is eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. federal withholding tax under an income tax treaty, it may obtain a refund or credit of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for a refund with the IRS. Non-U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding their possible entitlement to benefits under an applicable income tax treaty.

Dispositions of Common Shares or Warrants

Subject to the discussions below under "U.S. Trade or Business Income," "Information Reporting and Backup Withholding" and "FATCA," Non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax in respect of any gain on a sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares or warrants unless:

In general, a corporation is a USRPHC if the fair market value of its "United States real property interests" equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide real property interests and its other assets used or held for use in a trade or business. We believe that we are not currently, and we do not anticipate becoming in the future, a USRPHC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the event that we are determined to be a USRPHC, gain arising from the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or warrants by a Non‑U.S. Holder will, nonetheless, not be subject to tax as U.S. trade or business income if our common shares are "regularly traded" (as defined by applicable Treasury regulations) on an established securities market unless the Non‑U.S. Holder's holdings (direct and indirect, taking into account certain constructive ownership rules) exceed certain thresholds.

Exercise or Lapse of a Warrant

The U.S. federal income tax treatment of a Non-U.S. Holder's exercise of a warrant or the lapse of a warrant held by a Non-U.S. Holder generally will correspond to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the exercise, lapse, or redemption of a warrant by a U.S. Holder, as described under "U.S. Holders -Exercise of a Warrant" or "U.S. Holders -Dispositions of a Warrant," although to the extent a cashless exercise results in a taxable exchange, the tax consequences to the Non-U.S. Holder would be the same as those described under "Non-U.S. Holders -Dispositions of Common Shares or Warrants." A Non-U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in a warrant would generally equal the Non-U.S. Holder's acquisition cost of the warrant (i.e., the portion of the Non-U.S. Holder's purchase price for a Unit that is allocated to the warrant, as described under "General Treatment of Units"), increased by the amount of any constructive dividends included in income by such Non-U.S. Holder, as described under "Possible Constructive Distributions."

Distributions on Warrants

We may make distributions on warrants in certain circumstances, as described above under "Description of Securities ‑Public Warrants" and "Description of Securities -Warrants." We expect to treat any distributions on the warrants as U.S.‑source "fixed or determinable annual or periodical gains, profits and income." As a result, subject to the discussions below under "—U.S. Trade or Business Income," "Information Reporting and Backup Withholding" and "FATCA," Non‑U.S. Holders generally will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a 30% rate, or at a reduced rate prescribed by an applicable income tax treaty, on such distributions. However, the treatment of distributions on warrants is not entirely clear and Non‑U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving distributions on the warrants.

In order to obtain a reduced rate of U.S. federal withholding tax under an applicable income tax treaty, Non-U.S. Holders will be required to provide a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN or Form W-8BEN-E (or, in each case, a successor form) certifying the Non-U.S. Holder's entitlement to benefits under such treaty. If a Non-U.S. Holder is eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. federal withholding tax under an income tax treaty, or otherwise determines that we over-withheld from distributions to the Non-U.S. Holder, it may obtain a refund or credit of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for a refund with the IRS. Non-U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding their possible entitlement to benefits under an applicable income tax treaty.

Possible Constructive Distributions

The terms of each warrant provide for an adjustment to the number of shares of common shares for which the warrant may be exercised or to the exercise price of the warrant in certain events. An adjustment which has the effect of preventing dilution is generally not a taxable event. Nevertheless, a Non-U.S. Holder of warrants would be treated as receiving a constructive distribution from us if, for example, the adjustment increases the holder's proportionate interest in our assets or earnings and profits (e.g., through an increase in the number of shares of common shares that would be obtained upon exercise or through a decrease in the exercise price of the warrants), including as a result of a distribution of cash or other property, such as securities, to the holders of common shares, or as a result of the issuance of a stock dividend to holders of shares of our common shares, in each case which is taxable to such Non-U.S. Holders as described under "Non-U.S. Holders -Distributions." A Non-U.S. Holder would be subject to U.S. federal income tax withholding under that section in the same manner as if such Non-U.S. Holder received a cash distribution from us equal to the fair market value of such increased interest. Generally, a Non-U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in its warrant would be increased to the extent any such constructive distribution is treated as a dividend.

U.S. Trade or Business Income

For purposes of this discussion, dividends paid in respect of common shares and gain on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or warrants will be considered to be "U.S. trade or business income" if (A)(i) such dividends or gain is effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder's conduct of a trade or business within the United States and (ii) the Non-U.S. Holder is eligible for the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty and such treaty requires that such dividends or gain is attributable to a permanent establishment (or, if the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual, a fixed base) that the Non-U.S. Holder maintains in the United States or (B) with respect to gain, we are or have been a USRPHC at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of the disposition of our common shares or warrants and the Non-U.S. Holder's holding period for our common shares or warrants (subject to the exception set forth above in the last sentence of the second paragraph of "Dispositions"). Generally, a Non-U.S. Holder's U.S. trade or business income is not subject to U.S. federal withholding tax (provided that the Non-U.S. Holder complies with applicable certification and disclosure requirements, including providing a properly executed IRS Form W-8ECI (or successor form)); instead, the Non-U.S. Holder is subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net basis at regular U.S. federal income tax rates (generally in the same manner as a United States person) on the Non-U.S. Holder's U.S. trade or business income. Any U.S. trade or business income received by a corporate Non-U.S. Holder may also be subject to a "branch profits tax" at a 30% rate, or at a lower rate prescribed by an applicable income tax treaty.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

We must annually report to the IRS and to each Non-U.S. Holder any dividends paid in respect of our common shares that is subject to U.S. federal withholding tax or that is exempt from such withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty. Copies of these information returns may also be made available under the provisions of a specific treaty or agreement to the tax authorities of the country in which a Non-U.S. Holder resides or is established. Under certain circumstances, the Code imposes a backup withholding obligation on certain reportable payments. Dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder will generally be exempt from backup withholding if the Non-U.S. Holder certifies its non-U.S. status by providing a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN, Form W-8BEN-E or Form W-8ECI (or, in each case, a successor form) or otherwise establish an exemption, and the applicable withholding agent does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the Non-U.S. Holder is a United States person or that the conditions of such other exemption are not, in fact, satisfied.

The payment of the proceeds from a Non-U.S. Holder's sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares to or through the U.S. office of any broker (U.S. or non-U.S.) will be subject to information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding unless the Non-U.S. Holder certifies as to its non-U.S. status under penalties of perjury by providing the certification described above to the broker or otherwise establish an exemption, and the broker does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the Non-U.S. Holder is a United States person or that the conditions of any other exemption are not, in fact, satisfied. The payment of proceeds from a Non-U.S. Holder's sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares to or through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker will not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding unless the non-U.S. broker has certain types of relationships with the United States (a "U.S. related financial intermediary"). In the case of the payment of proceeds from a Non-U.S. Holder's sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares to or through a non-U.S. office of a broker that is either a United States person or a U.S. related financial intermediary, information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding will apply on the payment unless the broker has documentary evidence, such as the certifications described above, in its files certifying that the Non-U.S. Holder is not a United States person and the broker has no knowledge to the contrary. Non-U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of information reporting and backup withholding in light of their particular circumstances.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a Non-U.S. Holder will be refunded or credited against the Non-U.S. Holder's U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

FATCA

Pursuant to Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code, commonly referred to as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act ("FATCA"), "foreign financial institutions" and "non-financial foreign entities" (each as defined in the Code) that do not otherwise qualify for an exemption must comply with information reporting rules with respect to their U.S. account holders and investors or be subject to a withholding tax on certain types of U.S.-source payments made to them (whether received as a beneficial owner or as an intermediary for another party).

More specifically, a foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity that does not comply with the FATCA reporting requirements or otherwise qualify for an exemption will generally be subject to a 30% withholding tax with respect to any "withholdable payments." For this purpose, withholdable payments generally include dividends on, or (subject to the proposed Treasury regulations discussed below) gross proceeds from the disposition of, our common shares paid to a foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity. Foreign financial institutions located in jurisdictions that have an intergovernmental agreement with the United States governing FATCA may be subject to different rules.

Withholding under FATCA currently applies to dividends paid in respect of our common shares. Proposed Treasury regulations, the preamble to which state that they can be relied upon until final Treasury regulations are issued, exempt from FATCA withholding gross proceeds from the dispositions of stock. To prevent withholding on dividends, Non-U.S. Holders may be required to provide the Company (or its withholding agents) with applicable tax forms or other information. Non-U.S. Holders are urged to consult with their own tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of FATCA to them based on their particular circumstances.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

In General

We are offering a maximum of 2,222,222 Units on a “best-efforts” basis, at a fixed price of $3.50 to $5.50 per Unit (to be fixed by post-qualification supplement). There is no minimum purchase requirement for investors in this offering. This offering will terminate at the earliest of (a) the date on which the maximum offering has been sold, (b) the date which is one year from this offering being qualified by the SEC or (c) the date on which this offering is earlier terminated by us, in our sole discretion. This offering could terminate without a closing in the event that there is no market or interest for the Units.

The common shares issuable from time to time upon exercise of the warrants included in the Units are also being offered by this offering circular.

There is no minimum number of Units that we are required to sell in this offering. All funds derived by us from this offering will be immediately available for use by us, in accordance with the uses set forth in the section entitled “Use of Proceeds” of this Offering Circular. No funds will be placed in an escrow account during the offering period and no funds will be returned once an investor’s subscription agreement has been accepted by us.

The Units will be offered by Maxim Group LLC, a broker-dealer registered with the SEC and a member of FINRA (“Maxim” or the “Placement Agent”), on a “best efforts” basis pursuant to the placement agency agreement to be entered into between us and Maxim, which we refer to as the “Placement Agent Agreement.” Pursuant to the Placement Agent Agreement, we will pay the Placement Agent, concurrently with each closing of this offering, a cash placement fee equal to 7.5% of the gross proceeds of such closing, except for with respect to proceeds received from investors introduced by the Company, for which a cash placement fee equal to 3.0% of the gross proceeds attributable to such investors in the applicable closing shall be payable to the Placement Agent. In addition, we will also pay the Placement Agent up to $75,000 for fees and expenses of legal counsel and other out-of-pocket expenses out of the proceeds of the closing.

We or the Placement Agent may also ask other FINRA member broker-dealers that are registered with the SEC to participate as soliciting dealers for this offering.

Procedures for Subscribing

If you are interested in subscribing for securities in this offering, please submit a request for information by e-mail to Syndicate Department at Maxim Group LLC at: syndicate@maximgrp.com; all relevant information will be delivered to you by return e-mail. Thereafter, should you decide to subscribe for the Units, you are required to follow the procedures described in the subscription agreement included in the delivered information, which are:

• Electronically execute and deliver to us a subscription agreement; and

• Deliver funds directly by check or by wire or electronic funds transfer via ACH to our specified bank account.

Acceptance of a subscription may occur up to 10 calendar days after a prospective investor submits a subscription agreement, depending on the volume of subscriptions received. Once a subscription is accepted, Units will be issued to the subscriber as of the date of settlement, which will not occur until an investor’s funds have cleared and we issue the shares of our common stock. We expect that such clearance will occur within T+1 days of acceptance of a subscription agreement.

We reserve the right to reject any investor’s subscription in whole or in part for any reason, including if we determine in our sole and absolute discretion that such investor is not a “qualified purchaser” for purposes of Section 18(b)(4)(D)(ii) of the Securities Act. If the offering terminates or if any prospective investor’s subscription is rejected, all funds received from such investors will be returned without interest or deduction and such prospective investor will be promptly notified.

Right to Reject Subscriptions

The Units will be issued in a continuous offering which will commence within two calendar days after the qualification of this offering. After we receive your complete, executed subscription agreement and the funds required under the subscription agreement have been transferred to us, we have the right to review and accept or reject your subscription in whole or in part, for any reason or for no reason. We will attempt to accept or reject subscriptions within 10 calendar days of receipt. If we accept your subscription, we or Maxim will email you a confirmation. Such funds will be kept in a non-interest bearing escrow account until such time as the foregoing determination is made. We anticipate that, once such subscription agreement is accepted, we will settle such transaction on a T+1 basis. If we reject your subscription, we or Maxim will return all monies from rejected subscriptions immediately to you, without interest or deduction.

State Law Exemption and Offerings to “Qualified Purchasers”

The Units are being offered and sold to “qualified purchasers” (as defined in Regulation A under the Securities Act). As a Tier 2 offering pursuant to Regulation A under the Securities Act, this offering will be exempt from state “Blue Sky” law review, subject to certain state filing requirements and anti-fraud provisions, to the extent that the Units offered hereby are offered and sold only to “qualified purchasers.”

“Qualified purchasers” include any person to whom securities are offered or sold in a Tier 2 offering pursuant to Regulation A under the Securities Act. We reserve the right to reject any investor’s subscription in whole or in part for any reason, including if we determine, in our sole and absolute discretion, that such investor is not a “qualified purchaser” for purposes of Regulation A. We intend to offer and sell the Units to qualified purchasers in every state of the United States.

Issuance of Securities

Upon settlement, that is, at such time as an investor’s funds have cleared and we have accepted an investor’s subscription agreement, we will either issue such investor’s purchased common shares and warrants in book-entry form or issue a certificate or certificates representing such investor’s purchased common shares and warrants.

Transferability of the Securities

The common shares and warrants will be generally freely transferable, subject to any restrictions imposed by applicable securities laws or regulations.

Listing of Common Shares and Warrants

Our common shares are listed on the Nasdaq under the symbols "MDCX". The warrants offered hereby will not be listed on any U.S. securities exchange.

EXPENSES OF THIS OFFERING

Set forth below is an itemization of the total expenses, excluding commissions, which are expected to be incurred in connection with our sale of shares in this offering. With the exception of the filing fee payable to FINRA, all amounts are estimates.

EXPERTS AND LEGAL MATTERS

No expert or counsel named in this offering circular as having prepared or certified any part of this offering circular or having given an opinion upon the validity of the securities being registered or upon other legal matters in connection with the registration or offering of the securities was employed on a contingency basis or had, or is to receive, in connection with the offering, a substantial interest, directly or indirectly, in the Company or its subsidiaries. Nor was any such person connected with the Company or any of its subsidiaries as a promoter, managing or principal underwriters, voting trustee, director, officer or employee.

The financial statements included in this offering circular have been so included in reliance upon the report of MNP LLP, independent registered public accountants, upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The validity of the issuance of our common shares offered in this offering circular and certain other legal matters as to Canadian law will be passed upon for us by Bennett Jones LLP, Toronto, Canada. Certain legal matters governed by U.S. law including with respect to the warrants offered in this offering circular, will be passed upon for us by Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, New York. The Placement Agents are being represented by Pryor Cashman LLP, New York, New York. 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the SEC an offering circular (including amendments and exhibits to the offering circular) on Form 1-A. This offering circular does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement. For further information, we refer you to the exhibits and schedules filed as part of this offering circular. If a document has been filed as an exhibit to this offering circular, we refer you to the copy of the document that has been filed. Each statement in this offering circular relating to a document filed as an exhibit is qualified in all respects by the filed exhibit. You should read this offering circular and the documents that we have filed as exhibits to this offering circular completely. The SEC maintains an internet site at www.sec.gov, from which you can electronically access the offering circular and its exhibits.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following financial statements and related management's discussion and analysis are included in this offering circular:

1. Interim Financial Statements of Medicus Pharma Ltd. for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023.

2. Audited Financial Statements of Medicus Pharma Ltd. for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Medicus Pharma Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023

(unaudited) (expressed in United States dollars, except number of shares)

Medicus Pharma Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Financial Position

(unaudited) (expressed in United States dollars)

Approved on behalf of the Board:

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

Medicus Pharma Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss

(unaudited) (expressed in United States dollars, except number of shares)