AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM 1-A

TIER II OFFERING

REGULATION A OFFERING CIRCULAR UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

PRELIMINARY OFFERING CIRCULAR DATED NOVEMBER 12, 2020

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

An offering statement pursuant to Regulation A relating to these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained in this preliminary offering circular is subject to completion or amendment. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted before the offering statement filed with the Commission is qualified. This Preliminary offering circular shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor may there be any sales of these securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful before registration or qualification under the laws of any such state. We may elect to satisfy our obligation to deliver a final offering circular by sending you a notice within two business days after the completion of our sale to you that contains the URL where the final offering circular or the offering statement in which such Final offering circular was filed may be obtained.

BRAIN SCIENTIFIC INC.

125 Wilbur Place, Suite 170

Bohemia, NY 11716

Phone: (917) 388-1578

Maximum of 1,111,111 Units,

Each Unit Consisting of Five (5) Shares of Common Stock, which equates to $1.80 per share, and

Warrant to Purchase One (1) Share of Common Stock  

This offering (the “Offering”) will terminate at the earlier of (1) the date at which the maximum offering amount has been sold, (2) one hundred and eighty (180) days from the qualification of this circular or ______, 2021, or (3) the date at which the offering is earlier terminated by the Company at its sole discretion. Funds will be deposited into a segregated account maintained at Novation Solutions Inc. (O/A DealMaker, hereinafter “DealMaker”), who acts as the funds collection agent for the Offering. Dealmaker is an online platform administering this Offering for the benefit of the Company. The Offering is being conducted on a best-efforts basis with the targeted maximum offering amount (the “Maximum Offering Amount”) of $10,000,000. There is no minimum offering amount in this Offering. The Company may undertake one or more closings on a rolling basis. After each closing, funds tendered by investors will be made available to the Company assuming the Company has accepted the investors’ subscription for the Units. After the initial closing of this offering, we expect to hold closings on at least a monthly basis.

THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION DOES NOT PASS UPON THE MERITS OR GIVE ITS APPROVAL OF ANY SECURITIES OFFERED OR THE TERMS OF THE OFFERING, NOR DOES IT PASS UPON THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OFFERING CIRCULAR OR OTHER SOLICITATION MATERIALS. THESE SECURITIES ARE OFFERED PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION WITH THE COMMISSION; HOWEVER, THE COMMISSION HAS NOT MADE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION THAT THE SECURITIES OFFERED ARE EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION

GENERALLY, NO SALE MAY BE MADE TO YOU IN THIS OFFERING IF THE AGGREGATE PURCHASE PRICE YOU PAY IS MORE THAN 10% OF THE GREATER OF YOUR ANNUAL INCOME OR NET WORTH. DIFFERENT RULES APPLY TO ACCREDITED INVESTORS AND NON-NATURAL PERSONS. BEFORE MAKING ANY REPRESENTATION THAT YOUR INVESTMENT DOES NOT EXCEED APPLICABLE THRESHOLDS, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO REVIEW RULE 251(d)(2)(i)(C) OF REGULATION A. FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ON INVESTING, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO REFER TO www.investor.gov.

This offering is inherently risky. See “Risk Factors” on page 2.

Sales of these securities will commence on approximately _______, 2020.

The Company is following the “Offering Circular” format of disclosure under Regulation A.

The date of this offering circular is_______ __, 2020.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our Units involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information provided in this offering circular, you should carefully consider the following risk factors in evaluating our business and before purchasing any of our securities. We are subject to a number of risks, including risks that may prevent us from achieving our business objectives or that may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have incurred significant operating losses since inception and cannot assure you that we will ever achieve or sustain profitability. 

We have incurred losses since the formation of MemoryMD in 2015 and had an accumulated deficit of $3,672,077 as of December 31, 2019 and had a working capital deficit of $897,206 as of December 31, 2019. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating and net losses for the foreseeable future. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through debt and equity financings. To date, our primary activities have been limited to, and our limited resources have been dedicated to, performing business and financial planning, raising capital, recruiting personnel, negotiating with business partners and the licensors of our intellectual property and conducting development activities, including the commercialization of our first two Products.

We believe that to fully implement our business strategy we need to, among other things, raise approximately or generate revenues of $10.0 million, or some combination thereof. We have never been profitable and do not expect to be profitable in the foreseeable future. Any profitability in the future will be dependent upon the successful development of our business model, of which we can give no assurance of success. We expect our expenses to increase significantly as we pursue our objectives. The extent of our future operating losses and the timing of profitability are highly uncertain, and we expect to continue incurring significant expenses and operating losses over the next several years. Our prior losses have had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity and working capital. Any additional operating losses may have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity, and we cannot assure you that we will ever be able to achieve profitability. Even if we achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would depress the value of our company and could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, maintain our development efforts, obtain regulatory approvals or continue our operations. Accordingly, we are a highly speculative venture involving significant financial risk.

We are a development stage company with a limited operating history, making it difficult for you to evaluate our business and your investment.

Our operations are subject to all of the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including but not limited to the absence of an operating history, lack of fully-developed or commercialized products, insufficient capital, expected substantial and continual losses for the foreseeable future, limited experience in dealing with regulatory issues, lack of manufacturing and marketing experience, need to rely on third parties for the development and commercialization of our proposed Products, a competitive environment characterized by well-established and well-capitalized competitors and reliance on key personnel.

We may not be successful in carrying out our business objectives. The revenue and income potential of our proposed business and operations are unproven as the lack of operating history makes it difficult to evaluate the future prospects of our business. There is nothing at this time on which to base an assumption that our business operations will prove to be successful or that we will ever be able to operate profitably. Accordingly, we have no track record of successful business activities, strategic decision-making by management, fund-raising ability, and other factors that would allow an investor to assess the likelihood that we will be successful in our business. There is a substantial risk that we will not be successful in fully implementing our business plan, or if initially successful, in thereafter generating material operating revenues or in achieving profitable operations.

Since inception of MemoryMD in 2015, we have not established any material revenues or operations that will provide financial stability in the long term, and there can be no assurance that we will realize our plans on our projected timetable (or at all) in order to reach sustainable or profitable operations.

We are not currently generating any revenue from sales of Products, and may never be able to successfully commercialize our NeuroEEG™ and NeuroCap™, or other future Product candidates. Even if we succeed in commercializing any of such Products, we may never generate revenues significant enough to achieve profitability.

In 2019, we commenced acting as a distributor of third-party medical devices in Russia (including those purchased from a company affiliated with one of our officers and directors), which resulted in all of our revenue for 2019. While we intend to continue the sale of third party medical devices, we do not intend for it to be our primary source of revenue in the long-term and expect to curtail or cease this line of operations as, if and when we commence generating material, recurring revenues from our Products, of which we can give no assurance. We also can give no assurance that any revenue we generate from so acting as a distributor of third-party medical devices will continue, will continue to be material or will be sufficient to enable us to continue our operations. We have no supply or distribution agreements with respect to such business.

Investors are subject to all the risks incident to the creation and development of a new business and each investor should be prepared to withstand a complete loss of his, her or its investment. Furthermore, the accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. We have not emerged from the development stage, and may be unable to raise further equity. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The Company has limited experience in medical device development and commercialization. Our ability to become profitable depends primarily on: our ability to develop our Products, our successful completion of all necessary pre-clinical testing and clinical trials on such Products, our ability to obtain approval for such Products and, if approved, successfully commercialize such Products, our ongoing research and development efforts, the timing and cost of clinical trials, our ability to identify personnel with the necessary skill sets or enter into favorable alliances with third-parties who can provide substantial capabilities in clinical development, regulatory affairs, sales, marketing and distribution and our ability to obtain and maintain necessary intellectual property rights to such Products. Our limited experience in medical device development may make it more difficult for us to complete these tasks.

Even if we successfully develop and market our Products, we may not generate sufficient or sustainable revenue to achieve or sustain profitability, which could cause us to cease operations and cause you to lose all of your investment. Because we are subject to these risks, you may have a difficult time evaluating our business and your investment in our Company. 

Our ability to continue our operations requires that we raise additional capital and our operations could be curtailed if we are unable to obtain the additional funding as or when needed. As a result, our registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph relating to our ability to continue as a going concern in its report on our audited financial statements included in this circular. We will need to raise substantial additional funds in the future, and these funds may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. A failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed could force us to delay, limit, scale back or cease some or all operations.

Upon the completion of the audit of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, we concluded there was substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As a result, our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph regarding this uncertainty in its report on those financial statements.

The continued growth of our business, including the development, regulatory approval and commercialization of our Products, will significantly increase our expenses going forward, regardless of our revenues. As a result, we are required to seek substantial additional funds to continue our business. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents, without raising additional capital or generating additional revenues, is insufficient to fund our operating expenses for the foreseeable future. We expect to seek additional capital from public or private offerings of our capital stock, borrowings under credit lines, if available, or other sources.

We may not be able to raise additional capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Any failure to raise additional capital could compromise our ability to execute on our business plan, and we may be forced to liquidate our assets. In such a scenario, the values we receive for our assets in liquidation or dissolution could be significantly lower than the values reflected in our financial statements.

If we issue equity or debt securities to raise additional funds, our existing stockholders may experience dilution, and the new equity or debt securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing stockholders. In addition, if we raise additional funds through collaborations, licensing, joint ventures, strategic alliances, partnership arrangements or other similar arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish valuable rights to our potential future products or proprietary technologies, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.

Medical device development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome. We may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of any Product.

Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of our Products under development in the United States or elsewhere, we must complete all pre-clinical testing, clinical trials and other regulatory requirements necessitated by the FDA and foreign regulatory bodies and demonstrate the performance and safety of our Products. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and is inherently uncertain as to outcome. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. Further, the outcomes of completed clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and interim results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. Clinical data is often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their products performed satisfactorily in clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval. We have limited resources to complete the expensive process of medical device development, pre-clinical testing and clinical trials, putting at a disadvantage, particularly compared to some of our larger and established competitors, and we may not have sufficient resources to commercialize our Products under development in a timely fashion, if ever.

We may experience numerous unforeseen events during or as a result of clinical trials that could delay or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize our Products, including:

If we are required to conduct additional clinical trials or other testing of our Products under development beyond those that we contemplate, if we are unable to successfully complete clinical trials of our Products under development or other testing, if the results of these trials or tests are not favorable or if there are safety concerns, we may:

Our development costs will also increase if we experience delays in testing or marketing approvals. We do not know whether any of our clinical trials will begin as planned, will need to be restructured or will be completed on schedule, or at all. Significant clinical trial delays also could allow our competitors to bring innovative products to market before we do and impair our ability to successfully commercialize our Products.

Business or economic disruptions or global health concerns could seriously harm our business.

Broad-based business or economic disruptions could adversely affect our business. For example, in December 2019 an outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus originated in Wuhan, China, and has since spread around the world. To date, this outbreak has already resulted in extended shutdowns of businesses around the world, including in the United States. We cannot presently predict the scope and severity of any potential business shutdowns or disruptions, but if we or any of the third parties with whom we engage, including the suppliers, clinical trial sites, regulators, health care providers and other third parties with whom we conduct business, were to experience shutdowns or other business disruptions, our ability to conduct our business could be materially and negatively impacted. It is also possible that global health concerns such as this one could disproportionately impact the hospitals, clinics and healthcare providers to whom we intend to sell our products, as, if and when commercialized, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operation and financial condition.

Current economic and political conditions make tax rules in any jurisdiction subject to significant change.

We are subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes, in both the U.S. and ultimately various jurisdictions outside the U.S. where we intend to operate. We cannot predict the overall impact that changes or revisions to any such tax laws and regulations, whether in in the U.S. or in jurisdictions outside the U.S., may have on our business. We may be subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions, and the tax authorities conducting such audits may disagree with certain taxation positions we have taken and assess additional taxes. Although we intend to regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax obligations, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these audits, and the actual outcomes of these audits could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and business operations.

Recent executive and legislative actions to amend or impede the implementation of the Affordable Care Act and ongoing efforts to repeal, replace or further modify the Affordable Care Act may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Recent executive and legislative actions to amend or impede the implementation of the Affordable Care Act and ongoing efforts to repeal, replace or further modify the Affordable Care Act may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There have been judicial and congressional challenges to certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act, as well as recent efforts by the Trump administration to repeal or replace certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act. Since January 2017, President Trump has signed two Executive Orders and other directives designed to delay the implementation of certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act or otherwise circumvent some of the requirements for health insurance mandated by the Affordable Care Act. Concurrently, Congress has considered legislation that would repeal or repeal and replace all or part of the Affordable Care Act. While Congress has not passed comprehensive repeal legislation, two bills affecting the implementation of certain taxes under the Affordable Care Act have been signed into law. The Tax Act included a provision which repealed, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the Affordable Care Act on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate”. The 2018 Appropriations Resolution delayed the implementation of certain Affordable Care Act-mandated fees, including, without limitation, the medical device excise tax. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, or BBA, among other things, amended the Affordable Care Act, effective January 1, 2019, to close the coverage gap in most Medicare drug plans, commonly referred to as the “donut hole”. In July 2018, CMS published a final rule permitting further collections and payments to and from certain Affordable Care Act qualified health plans and health insurance issuers under the Affordable Care Act risk adjustment program in response to the outcome of federal district court litigation regarding the method CMS uses to determine this risk adjustment. On December 14, 2018, a Texas U.S. District Court Judge ruled that the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress as part of the Tax Act. While the Texas U.S. District Court Judge, as well as the Trump administration and CMS, have stated that the ruling will have no immediate effect pending appeal of the decision, it is unclear how this decision, subsequent appeals, and other efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act will impact the Affordable Care Act and our business.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. These changes included aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect in April 2013 and, due to the BBA, will stay in effect through 2027 unless additional Congressional action is taken. In January 2013, President Obama signed into law the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. These new laws may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding, which could negatively impact customers for our product candidates, if approved, and, accordingly, our financial operations.

We expect that other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding, more rigorous coverage criteria, new payment methodologies and additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved product. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our Products.

We are subject to costly and complex laws and governmental regulations and any adverse regulatory action may materially adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.

Our medical devices are subject to regulation by numerous government agencies, including the FDA and comparable agencies outside of the U.S. To varying degrees, each of these agencies requires us to comply with laws and regulations governing the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, marketing, and distribution of our Products. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain marketing clearance for our new Products, or enhancements or modifications to existing Products, and the failure to maintain approvals or obtain approval or clearance could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of our business and our business operations. Even if we are able to obtain such approval or clearance, it may take a significant amount of time, require the expenditure of substantial resources, involve stringent clinical and pre-clinical testing, require increased post-market surveillance, involve modifications, repairs, or replacements of our Products, and result in limitation on the proposed uses of our Products.

Both before and after a Product or service is commercially released or offered, we have ongoing responsibilities under FDA regulations. Many of our facilities and procedures and those of our suppliers are also subject to periodic inspections by the FDA to determine compliance with the FDA’s requirements, including the quality system regulations and medical device reporting regulations. The results of these inspections can include inspectional observations on FDA’s Form-483, warning letters, or other forms of enforcement. If the FDA were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, or that any of our medical devices are ineffective or pose an unreasonable health risk, the FDA could ban such medical devices, detain or seize adulterated or misbranded medical devices, order a recall, repair, replacement, or refund of such devices, refuse to grant pending pre-market approval applications or require certificates of non-U.S. governments for exports, and/or require us to notify health professionals and others that the devices present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health. The FDA may also assess civil or criminal penalties against us, our officers or employees and impose operating restrictions on a company-wide basis, or enjoin and/or restrain certain conduct resulting in violations of applicable law. The FDA may also recommend prosecution to the U. S. Department of Justice. Governmental agencies comparable to the FDA which operate in foreign jurisdictions may also require us to comply with regulations similar to those required by the FDA, and failing to do so may result in material adverse ramifications similar to those caused by a failure to comply with FDA regulations. Any adverse regulatory action, depending on its magnitude, may restrict us from effectively marketing and selling our Products and limit our ability to obtain future pre-market clearances or approvals, and could cause result in a substantial modification to our business practices and operations.

In addition, the FDA has taken the position that device manufacturers are prohibited from promoting their products other than for the uses and indications set forth in the approved product labeling. A number of enforcement actions have been taken against manufacturers that promote products for “off-label” uses, including actions alleging that federal health care program reimbursement of products promoted for “off-label” uses constitute false and fraudulent claims to the government. The failure to comply with “off-label” promotion restrictions can result in significant civil or criminal exposure, administrative obligations and costs, and/or other potential penalties from, and/or agreements with, the federal government.

Governmental regulations outside the U.S. have become increasingly stringent and more common, and we may become subject to more rigorous regulation by governmental authorities in the future in the event we determine to conduct business internationally. In the European Union, for example, a new Medical Device Regulation was published in 2017 which, when it enters into full force, will impose significant additional premarket and post-market requirements. Penalties for a company’s non-compliance with governmental regulation could be severe, including fines and revocation or suspension of a company’s business license, mandatory price reductions and criminal sanctions. Any governmental law or regulation imposed in the future may have a material adverse effect on us.

We are subject to environmental laws and regulations and the risk of environmental liabilities, violations and litigation.

We are subject to numerous U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. environmental, health and safety laws and regulations concerning, among other things, the health and safety of our employees, the generation, storage, use and transportation of hazardous materials, emissions or discharges of substances into the environment, investigation and remediation of hazardous substances or materials at various sites, chemical constituents in medical products and end-of-life disposal and take-back programs for medical devices. Our operations involve the use of substances regulated under such laws and regulations, primarily those used in manufacturing and sterilization processes. If we violate these environmental laws and regulations, we could be fined, criminally charged or otherwise sanctioned by regulators.

In addition, certain environmental laws assess liability on current or previous owners or operators of real property for the costs of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous substances or materials at their properties or at properties which they have disposed of hazardous substances. Liability for investigative, removal and remedial costs under certain U.S. federal and state laws are retroactive, strict and joint and several. In addition to cleanup actions brought by governmental authorities, private parties could bring personal injury or other claims due to the presence of, or exposure to, hazardous substances. The ultimate cost of site cleanup and timing of future cash outflows is difficult to predict, given the uncertainties regarding the extent of the required cleanup, the interpretation of applicable laws and regulations, and alternative cleanup methods.

We may in the future be subject to additional environmental claims for personal injury or cleanup based on our past, present or future business activities (including the past activities of companies we may acquire). The costs of complying with current or future environmental protection and health and safety laws and regulations, or liabilities arising from past or future releases of, or exposures to, hazardous substances, may exceed our estimates, or have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of our business and our business operations.

Our failure to comply with laws and regulations relating to reimbursement of health care goods and services may subject us to penalties and adversely impact our reputation, financial condition, and business operations.

Our Products are expected to be purchased primarily by medical professionals and organizations that typically bill various third-party payers, such as governmental programs (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid and comparable non-U.S. programs), private insurance plans and managed care plans, for the healthcare services provided to their patients. The ability of our customers to obtain appropriate reimbursement for products from third-party payers is critical because it affects which products customers purchase and the prices they are willing to pay for such products. As a result, our Products are subject to regulation regarding quality and cost by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) as well as comparable state and non-U.S. agencies responsible for reimbursement and regulation of health care goods and services. The principal U.S. federal laws implicated include those that prohibit (i) the filing of false or improper claims for federal payment, known as the false claims laws, (ii) unlawful inducements for the referral of business reimbursable under federally-funded health care programs, known as the anti-kickback laws, and (iii) health care service providers from seeking reimbursement for providing certain services to a patient who was referred by a physician who has certain types of direct or indirect financial relationships with the service provider, known as the Stark Law. Many states have similar laws that apply to reimbursement by state Medicaid and other funded programs as well as in some cases to all payers. Insurance companies can also bring a private cause of action claiming treble damages against a manufacturer for causing a false claim to be filed under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. In addition, if we were to become a manufacturer of FDA-approved devices reimbursable by federal healthcare programs, we would be subject to the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which would require us to annually report certain payments and other transfers of value we make to U.S.-licensed physicians or U.S. teaching hospitals.

Our anticipated domestic and international operations may be subject to risks relating to changes in government and private medical reimbursement programs and policies, and changes in legal regulatory requirements in the U.S. and around the world. Implementation of further legislative or administrative reforms to the reimbursement system in the U.S. and outside of the U.S., or adverse decisions relating to our Products or services by administrators of these systems in coverage or reimbursement, could significantly reduce reimbursement or result in the denial of coverage, which could have an impact on the acceptance of and demand for our Products and the prices that our customers are willing to pay for them.

The laws and regulations of healthcare related products that are applicable to us, including those described herein, are subject to evolving interpretations and enforcement discretion. If a governmental authority were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, we and our officers and employees could be subject to severe criminal and civil penalties, including, for example, exclusion from participation as a supplier of products or services to beneficiaries covered by CMS. Any failure to comply with laws and regulations relating to reimbursement and healthcare products could adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.

We are subject to federal, state and foreign healthcare regulations related to anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws, and could face substantial penalties if we fail to fully comply with such regulations and laws. 

The relationships that we and our potential distributors and others that market or may market our Products have with healthcare professionals, such as physicians and hospitals, are subject to scrutiny under various federal, state, foreign laws often referred to collectively as healthcare fraud and abuse laws. In addition, U.S. and foreign government regulators have increased the enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-bribery laws. We also must comply with a variety of other laws that protect the privacy of individually identifiable healthcare information and impose extensive tracking and reporting related to all transfers of value provided to certain healthcare professionals. These laws and regulations are broad in scope and are subject to evolving interpretation and we could be required to incur substantial costs to monitor compliance or to alter our practices if we are found not to be in compliance. Violations of these laws may be punishable by criminal or civil sanctions, including substantial fines, imprisonment of current or former employees and exclusion from participation in governmental healthcare programs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and business operations.

Quality problems with, and product liability claims in connection with our Products could lead to recalls or safety alerts, harm to our reputation, or adverse verdicts or costly settlements, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and business operations.

Quality is extremely important to us and our customers due to the serious and costly consequences of Product failure and our business exposes us to potential product liability risks that are inherent in the design, manufacture, and marketing of medical devices and services. In addition, our products may be used in intensive care settings with seriously ill patients. Component failures, manufacturing defects, design flaws, off-label use, or inadequate disclosure of product-related risks or product-related information with respect to our products, could result in an unsafe condition or injury to, or death of, a patient or other user of our products. These problems could lead to the recall of, or issuance of a safety alert relating to, our Products, and could result in unfavorable judicial decisions or settlements arising out of product liability claims and lawsuits, including class actions, which could negatively affect our financial condition and business operations. In particular, a material adverse event involving one of our products could result in reduced market acceptance and demand for all products offered under our brand, and could harm our reputation and ability to market products in the future.

High quality products are critical to the success of our business. If we fail to meet the high standards we set for ourselves and which our customers expect, and our products are the subject of recalls, safety alerts, or other material adverse events, our reputation could be damaged, we could lose customers, and our revenue and results of operations could decline. Our success also depends generally on our ability to manufacture to exact tolerances precision-engineered components, subassemblies, and finished devices from multiple materials. If our components fail to meet these standards or fail to adapt to evolving standards, our reputation, competitive advantage and market share could be negatively impacted. In certain situations, we may undertake a voluntary recall of products or temporarily shut down product production lines if we determine, based on performance relative to our own internal safety and quality monitoring and testing data, that we have or may be in danger of failing to meet the high quality standards we have set for ourselves and which our customers expect. Such recalls or cessation of services or product manufacturing may also negatively impact our business.

Any product liability claim brought against us, with or without merit, could be costly to defend and resolve. Any of the foregoing problems, including product liability claims or product recalls in the future, regardless of their ultimate outcome, could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and business operations.

We are substantially dependent on patent and other proprietary rights and failing to protect such rights or to be successful in litigation related to our rights or the rights of others may result in our payment of significant monetary damages and/or royalty payments, negatively impact our ability to sell current or future Products, or prohibit us from enforcing our patent and other proprietary rights against others.

We are and will continue to be materially dependent on a combination of patents, trade secrets, and trademarks, non-disclosure and non-competition agreements, and other intellectual property protections which will enable us to maintain our proprietary competitiveness. We also operate in an industry characterized by extensive patent litigation. Patent litigation against us can result in significant damage awards and injunctions that could prevent our manufacture and sale of affected Products or require us to pay significant royalties in order to continue to manufacture or sell affected Products. At any given time, we could potentially be involved as a plaintiff and/or as a defendant in a number of patent infringement and/or other contractual or intellectual property related actions, the outcomes of which may not be known for prolonged periods of time. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of such litigation, we acknowledge the possibility that any such litigation could result in our payment of significant monetary damages and/or royalty payments, negatively impact our ability to sell current or future Products, or prohibit us from enforcing our patent and proprietary rights against others, which would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of our business and on our business operations.

While we intend to defend against any threats to our intellectual property, including our patents, trade secrets, and trademarks, and while we intend to defend against any actual or threatened breaches of our non-disclosure and non-competition agreements, may not adequately protect our intellectual property or enforce such agreements. Further, patent or trademark applications currently pending that are owned by us may not result in patents or trademarks being issued to us, patents or trademarks issued to or licensed by us in the past or in the future may be challenged or circumvented by competitors and such patents or trademarks may be found invalid, unenforceable or insufficiently broad to protect our proprietary advantages.

In addition, the laws of certain countries in which we market, or intend to market, some or all of our Products do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S., which could make it easier for competitors to capture market position in such countries by utilizing technologies and other intellectual property that are similar to those developed or licensed by us. Competitors may also harm our sales by designing products or offering services that mirror the capabilities of our Products, or the technology contained therein, without infringing our intellectual property rights. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property in these countries, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and business operations.

If we experience decreasing prices for our Products and we are unable to reduce our expenses, our financial condition and business operations may suffer.

We may experience decreasing prices for our Products due to pricing pressure experienced by our customers from managed care organizations and other third-party payers, increased market power of our customers as the medical device industry consolidates, and increased competition among medical engineering and manufacturing service providers. If the prices for our Products decrease and we are unable to reduce our expenses, our results of operations will be adversely affected.

Our research and development efforts rely upon investments and investment collaborations, and we cannot guarantee that any previous or future investments or investment collaborations will be successful. 

Our commercialization strategy requires a wide variety of technologically advanced and capable Products. The rapid pace of technological development in the MedTech industry and the specialized expertise required in different areas of medicine make it difficult for one company alone to develop a broad portfolio of technological solutions. In addition to internally generated growth through our research and development efforts, we anticipate the need to rely upon investments and investment collaborations to provide us access to new technologies both in areas served by our contemplated businesses as well as in new areas. A failure to establish such collaborations may harm our financial condition and business operations.

Going forward, we expect to make future investments where we believe that we can stimulate the development or acquisition of new technologies, Products to further our strategic objectives and strengthen our existing business ventures. Investments and investment collaborations in and with medical technology companies are inherently risky, and we cannot guarantee that any of our previous or future investments or investment collaborations will be successful or will not have a materially adverse effect our financial condition and business operations.

The ability to offer our planned Products, and the continuing development of new Products, depends upon us maintaining strong relationships with health care professionals.

If we fail to maintain our working relationships with health care professionals, many of our Products may not be developed and offered in line with the needs and expectations of the professionals who use and support our Products, which could cause a decline in our earnings and profitability. The research, development, marketing, and sales of our Products is expected to be dependent upon our maintaining working relationships with such health care professionals, and the use of our Products is expected to often require the participation of health care professionals. In addition, health care professionals are the primary customer groups we expect to market and sell our Products directly to, further highlighting the importance of our relationship with such health care professionals. If we are unable to maintain our relationships with these professionals, we may lose our primary customer base, our Products may not be utilized correctly or to their full potential, and our ability to develop, manufacture, and market future Products may be significantly stunted.

Economic and political instability around the world could adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.

Economic and political instability around the world may adversely affect our ability to develop, manufacture, market, and sell our Products. Our customers and suppliers may experience financial difficulties or be unable to borrow money to fund their operations which may adversely impact their ability to purchase our Products or services or to pay for our Products on a timely basis, if at all. As with our customers and suppliers, these economic conditions make it more difficult for us to accurately forecast and plan our future business activities. In addition, a significant amount of our trade receivables are with national health care systems in the U.S. and in many foreign countries. Repayment of these receivables is dependent upon the political and financial stability of those countries. In light of domestic and global economic fluctuations, we continue to monitor the creditworthiness of customers located both inside and outside the U.S. Failure to receive payment of all or a significant portion of these receivables could adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.

Laws and regulations governing the export of our Products could adversely impact our business.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and the Bureau of Industry and Security at the U.S. Department of Commerce administer certain laws and regulations that restrict U.S. persons and, in some instances, non-U.S. persons, in conducting activities, transacting business with or making investments in certain countries, governments, entities and individuals subject to U.S. economic sanctions. Due to our planned international operations, we expect to be subject to such laws and regulations, which are complex, could restrict our business dealings with certain countries and individuals, and are constantly changing. Further restrictions may be enacted, amended, enforced or interpreted in a manner that adversely impacts our financial condition and business operations.

Consolidation in the health care industry may cause a material adverse effect on our financial health and business operations.

In response to a variety of actions by legislators, regulators, and third-party payers to reduce the perceived rise in healthcare costs, many health care industry companies, including health care systems, are consolidating to create new companies with greater market power. As the health care industry consolidates, competition to provide goods and services to industry participants will become more intense. These industry participants may try to use their market power to negotiate price concessions or reductions our products which price concessions may be unanticipated and adversely affect our financial condition and business operations.

We operate in a highly competitive industry and we may be unable to compete effectively.

We expect to compete domestically and internationally in the neurology and diagnostic imaging MedTech markets. These markets are characterized by rapid change resulting from technological advances and scientific discoveries. In the product lines and offered services in which we compete, we face a mixture of competitors ranging from large manufacturers with multiple business lines to small manufacturers that offer a limited selection of niche products. Development by other companies of new or improved products, processes, technologies, or the introduction of reprocessed products or generic versions when our proprietary Products lose their patent protection may make our Products or proposed Products less competitive. In addition, we face competition from providers of alternative medical therapies such as pharmaceutical companies. Competitive factors include product reliability, product performance, product technology, product quality, breadth of product lines, product services, customer support, price, and reimbursement approval from health care insurance providers.

We also face competition for marketing, distribution, and collaborative development agreements, for establishing relationships health care professionals, medical associations, and academic and research institutions, and for licenses to intellectual property. In addition, academic institutions, governmental agencies and other public and private research organizations also may conduct research, seek patient protection and establish collaborative arrangements for discovery, research, clinical development and marketing of products similar to ours. These companies, professionals, and institutions compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, as well as in acquiring necessary product technologies.

A reduction or interruption in our supply of raw materials coupled with an inability to develop alternative sources for such raw materials, and other similar supply chain management difficulties, may adversely affect our ability to manufacture our Products.

The manufacture of our Products require the timely delivery of sufficient amounts of quality components and materials and is highly exacting and complex, due in part to strict regulatory requirements, and we cannot guarantee that our efforts to secure quality components and materials in a timely, cost effective manner will be successful. Other problems in the manufacturing process, including equipment malfunction, failure to follow specific protocols and procedures, defective raw materials and environmental factors, could lead to launch delays, product shortage, unanticipated costs, lost revenues and damage to our reputation. A failure to identify and address manufacturing problems prior to the release of Products to our customers may also result in quality or safety issues.

The Company’s operating results could be negatively impacted if it is unable to capitalize on research and development spending.

The Company has and intends to continue to spend a significant amount of time and resources on research and development projects in order to develop and validate new and innovative products. The Company believes these projects will result in the commercialization of new products and will create additional future sales. However, factors including regulatory delays, safety concerns or patent disputes could delay the introduction or marketing of new products. Additionally, unanticipated issues may arise in connection with current and future clinical studies that could delay or terminate a product’s development prior to regulatory approval. The Company may experience an unfavorable impact on its financial condition and business operations if we are unable to capitalize on those efforts by attaining the proper FDA approval or to successfully market new products.

We may be unable to attract and retain key employees.

Our sales, technical and other key personnel play an integral role in the development, marketing and selling of our Products. If we are unable to recruit, hire, develop and retain a talented, competitive work force, we may not be able to meet our strategic business objectives.

Risks Related to the Investment in our Securities

There is not now, and there may never be, an active market for our common stock and we cannot assure you that our common stock will become liquid or that it will be listed on a securities exchange.

There currently is no liquid market for our common stock. An investor may find it difficult to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of the common stock and trading of our common stock may be extremely sporadic. For example, several days may pass before any shares may be traded. A more active market for our common stock may never develop. In addition, if we failed to meet the criteria set forth in SEC regulations, various requirements would be imposed by law on broker-dealers who sell our securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. Consequently, such regulations may deter broker-dealers from recommending or selling the common stock, which may further affect its liquidity. This would also make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital.

Our shares may not become eligible to be traded electronically which could result in brokerage firms being unwilling to trade them.

Our shares of common stock are quoted on the OTC Market. However, our shares are not eligible with Depository Trust Company (DTC) to trade electronically. Because we are not DTC eligible, our shares cannot be electronically transferred between brokerage accounts, the practical effect of which means that our shares will not trade much, if at all, on the OTC Market. In order for our shares to trade on the OTC Market, our shares would need to be traded manually between broker dealers and their accounts, which is time consuming, costly and cumbersome. We cannot guaranty that our shares will ever become DTC eligible or how long it will take to become eligible.

The price of our common stock might fluctuate significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Volatility in the market price of our common stock may prevent you from being able to sell your shares of our common stock at or above the price you paid for your shares. The trading price of our common stock may be volatile and subject to wide price fluctuations in response to various factors, including:

These and other factors might cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially, which may negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock. In addition, from time to time, the stock market experiences price and volume fluctuations, some of which may be significant. This volatility has had a significant impact on the market price of securities issued by many companies across many industries. The changes frequently appear to occur without regard to the operating performance of the affected companies. Accordingly, the price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our company, and these fluctuations could materially reduce our share price.

Securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the overall market and in the market price of a company’s securities. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs, divert our management’s attention and resources, and harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.

The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define a “penny stock” as an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. The SEC’s penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, before a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and the salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, the penny stock rules generally require that before a transaction in a penny stock occurs, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s agreement to the transaction. If applicable in the future, these rules may restrict the ability of brokers-dealers to sell our common stock and may affect the ability of investors to sell their shares, until our common stock no longer is considered a penny stock.

Concentration of ownership of our common stock among our existing executive officers, directors and principal stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.

Our executive officers, directors and their affiliates, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 48.5% of our outstanding common stock as of October 7, 2020. As a result, these persons, acting together, would be able to significantly influence all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election and removal of directors, any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or other significant corporate transactions.

Some of these persons or entities may have interests different than yours. For example, they may be more interested in selling our company to an acquirer than other investors, or they may want us to pursue strategies that deviate from the interests of other stockholders.

We intend to issue more shares to raise capital, which will result in substantial dilution.

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of a maximum of 200,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock. Any additional financings effected by us may result in the issuance of additional securities without stockholder approval and the substantial dilution in the percentage of common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Moreover, the securities issued in any such transaction may be valued on an arbitrary or non-arm’s-length basis by our management, resulting in an additional reduction in the percentage of common stock held by our current stockholders on an as converted, fully-diluted basis. Our board of directors has the power to issue any or all of such authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval. To the extent that additional shares of common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for common stock are issued in connection with a financing, dilution to the interests of our stockholders will occur and the rights of the holder of common stock might be materially and adversely affected.

Anti-takeover provisions that may be in our charter and bylaws may prevent or frustrate attempts by stockholders to change the board of directors or current management and could make a third-party acquisition of us difficult.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may contain provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. These provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, you may have to sell some or all of your shares of our common stock in order to generate cash flow from your investment. You may not receive a gain on your investment when you sell shares and you may lose the entire amount of the investment.

We expect to incur increased costs and demands upon management as a result of being a public company.

As a public company in the United States, we expect to incur significant additional legal, accounting and other costs. These additional costs could negatively affect our financial results. In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including regulations implemented by the SEC and the stock exchange on which we may list our common stock, may increase legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If, notwithstanding our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards, we fail to comply, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be harmed.

Failure to comply with these rules might also make it more difficult for us to obtain some types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we might be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, on committees of our board of directors or as members of senior management.

Failure to establish and maintain an effective system of internal controls could result in material misstatements of our financial statements or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or fail to prevent fraud in which case, our stockholders could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which would harm our business and could negatively impact the price of our stock. Furthermore, our management and our independent auditors have identified certain internal control deficiencies, which management and our independent auditors believe constitute material weaknesses.

Prior to the Acquisition, Memory MD, Inc. was a private company with limited accounting personnel and other resources with which to address our internal controls and procedures. Following the Acquisition, we must review and update our internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies as our Company continues to evolve. In addition, in connection with the Acquisition and becoming a company that files reports with the SEC, we are required to comply with the internal control evaluation and certification requirements of Section 404 of SOX and management is required to report annually on our internal control over financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of SOX until the date we are no longer a “smaller reporting company” as defined by applicable SEC rules.

Any ineffective internal control regarding our financial reporting could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results and the price of our common stock could be negatively affected once we become a registrant required to file registration statements with the SEC. This reporting requirement could also make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. Any system of internal controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of the controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulation concerning control and procedures could have a material effect on our business, results of operation and financial condition. Any of these events could result in an adverse reaction in the financial marketplace due to a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which ultimately could negatively affect the market price of our shares, increase the volatility of our stock price and adversely affect our ability to raise additional funding. The effect of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors and as executive officers.

Our management’s evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of June 30, 2020 concluded that our controls were not effective, due to material weaknesses resulting from:

Management believes there is a reasonable possibility that these control deficiencies, if uncorrected, could result in material misstatements in the annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. Accordingly, we have determined that these control deficiencies constitute material weaknesses. Although the Company is taking steps to remediate the material weaknesses, it currently has limited resources to do so and there can be no assurance that similar incidents can be prevented in the future.

We will need to evaluate our existing internal controls over financial reporting against the criteria set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) (the “Framework”) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. During the course of our ongoing evaluation of the internal controls, we may identify other areas requiring improvement, and may have to design enhanced processes and controls to address issues identified through this review. Remediating any deficiencies, significant deficiencies or material weaknesses that we or our independent registered public accounting firm may identify may require us to incur significant costs and expend significant time and management resources. We cannot assure you that any of the measures we implement to remedy any such deficiencies will effectively mitigate or remedy such deficiencies. The existence of one or more material weaknesses could affect the accuracy and timing of our financial reporting. Investors could lose confidence in our financial reports, and the value of our common stock may be harmed, if our internal controls over financial reporting are found not to be effective by management or by an independent registered public accounting firm or if we make disclosure of existing or potential material weaknesses in those controls.

Even if we conclude that our internal control over financial reporting provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect fraud or misstatements. Failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our future reporting obligations.

Our reporting obligations as a public company will place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future. If we fail to timely achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to produce reliable financial reports or help prevent fraud. Our failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could prevent us from filing our periodic reports on a timely basis which could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, harm our business and negatively impact the trading price of our common stock.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports, or publish unfavorable research or reports, about us, our business or our market, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us and our business. Securities or industry analysts may elect not to provide coverage of our common stock, and such lack of coverage may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In the event we do not secure additional securities or industry analyst coverage, we will not have any control over the analysts or the content and opinions included in their reports. The price of our stock could decline if one or more securities or industry analysts downgrade our stock or issue other unfavorable commentary or research. If one or more securities or industry analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

We may be subject to unknown risks and liabilities which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Before the Acquisition, MemoryMD conducted due diligence on, among other things, the business and financial conditions of All Soft Gels that it believed was customary and appropriate for a transaction such as the Acquisition. However, the due diligence process may not have revealed all material liabilities of the Company then existing or which may be asserted in the future against us relating to the Company’s activities before the consummation of the Acquisition. In addition, the agreement with the Company contains representations with respect to the absence of any liabilities. However, there can be no assurance that the Company had no liabilities upon the closing of the Acquisition. Any such liabilities of the Company that survive the Acquisition Transaction could harm our revenues, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, in connection with the Acquisition, the known liabilities existing in All Soft Gels at the time of the Acquisition were cancelled or paid by us, as required by the Merger Agreement. Despite this requirement and the representations and warranties of All Soft Gels in the Merger Agreement, there may be unknown liabilities, or liabilities that were known but believed to be immaterial, related to the business of All Soft Gels that may become material liabilities we are subject to in the future. If we are subject to material liability as a result of the conduct of All Soft Gels, we may have limited recourse for such liabilities, which could have a material impact on our business and stock price.

Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We may choose to raise additional capital due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. Furthermore, the holders of our outstanding convertible notes may exercise their conversion right to convert part or all of the outstanding convertible notes to our common stock at prices that are at discount with the market price of our common stock pursuant to the respective terms of the various convertible promissory notes. If additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, additional shares of common stock are issued at discounted prices from the convertible notes, or perceptions that those sales or conversion could occur, the issuance of these securities could result in further dilution to investors purchasing our common stock in this offering or result in downward pressure on the price of our common stock, and our ability to raise capital in the future.

The warrants may not have any value.

Each warrant included in a Unit will have an exercise price of $2.25 per share and will expire on the third anniversary of the date it first becomes exercisable. In the event our common stock price does not exceed the exercise price of the warrants during the period when the warrants are exercisable, the warrants may not have any value.

There will be no public market for the warrants to purchase shares of our common stock being offered in this offering.

Currently there is no established public trading market for the warrants being offered in this Offering, and we do not intend to develop a market for the warrants. Holders of the warrants may not transfer or trade the warrants unless in compliance with one of the exceptions as set forth in the warrant agreement. Therefore, there is, nor will there be, a trading market for the warrants offered hereby.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION AND SELLING STOCKHOLDER

The Company is offering a maximum of 1,111,111 Units on a “best efforts” basis. Each Unit consists of five (5) shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase one (1) share of common stock at an exercise price of $2.25 per share. There is no minimum offering amount in this Offering.

The cash price is $9.00 per Unit which equates to $1.80 per share of common stock, included as part of the Unit. We will not issue fractional Units.

The Company intends to market the Units, consisting of common shares and warrants to purchase common shares, in this Offering both through online and offline means. Online marketing may take the form of contacting potential investors through electronic media and posting our offering circular materials on an online investment platform.

The Offering will terminate at the earliest of: (1) the date at which the Maximum Amount has been sold, (2) the date which is one hundred and eighty (180) days from this Offering being qualified by the Commission, and (3) the date at which the Offering is earlier terminated by the Company in its sole discretion. Funds will be deposited into a segregated account maintained at Novation Solutions Inc. (O/A DealMaker and hereinafter “DealMaker”), which will act as a funds collection agent for the offering. Dealmaker is an online platform administering this Offering for the benefit of the Company. The Company will pay Dealmaker a fee of $10,000 for hosting the Offering materials and be responsible for other expenses due to DealMaker, such as monthly subscription, transaction fees and tranche releases. A copy of the service agreement between the Company and DealMaker is filed herein as Exhibit 6.2.

The Company may undertake one or more closings on an ongoing basis. After each closing, funds tendered by investors will be available to the Company when and if the Company decides to accept the investors’ subscription for the Units. After the initial closing of this Offering, the Company expects to hold closings on at least a monthly basis.

The Company is offering its securities in all states.

The Company has engaged Dalmore Group, LLC (“Dalmore”), a New York limited liability company and broker-dealer registered with the SEC and a member of FINRA, to act as the broker-dealer of record in connection with this offering, but not for underwriting or placement agent services. Dalmore will:

As compensation for the services listed above, the Company has agreed to pay Dalmore $5,000 as a one-time set up fee, plus a commission equal to 1% of the amount raised in the offering to support the offering. In addition, the Company has agreed to engage Dalmore as a consultant to provide ongoing general consulting services relating to the Offering, such as coordination with third party vendors and general guidance with respect to the Offering. The Company will pay a one-time consulting fee of $20,000, which will be due and payable within 30 days after FINRA issues a no-objection letter and the Company receives the SEC Qualification. Assuming that the Maximum Offering Amount is sold, the Company estimates that the total fees the Company will pay to Dalmore will be approximately $125,000.

TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR RECIPIENT (INCLUDING FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES) WITH RESPECT TO THE INVESTMENT BENEFIT PACKAGES ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INVESTOR. INVESTORS MUST CONSULT WITH THEIR OWN PERSONAL ACCOUNTANT(S) AND/OR TAX ADVISOR(S) REGARDING THESE MATTERS.

The Online Platform

The Company has engaged DealMaker to host and administer the Offering of the Units on its online platform. DealMaker will act as a funds collection agent for the Offering. DealMaker will not directly solicit or communicate with investors with respect to offerings posted on its site, although it does advertise the existence of its platform, which may include identifying issuers listed on the platform. Our offering circular will be furnished to prospective investors in this offering via download 24 hours a day, 7 days a week on a designated website.

Process of Subscribing

You will be required to complete a subscription agreement in order to invest. The subscription agreement includes a representation by the investor to the effect that, if you are not an “accredited investor” as defined under securities law, you are investing an amount that does not exceed the greater of 10% of your annual income or 10% of your net worth (excluding your principal residence).

If you decide to subscribe for the Units in this Offering, you should complete the following steps:

Any potential investor will have ample time to review the subscription agreement, along with their counsel, prior to making any final investment decision. Dalmore will review all subscription agreements completed by the investor. After Dalmore has completed its review of a subscription agreement for an investment in the Company, the funds may be released from the designated account, provided that the Company has accepted the investment.

If the subscription agreement is not complete or there is other missing or incomplete information, the funds will not be released until the investor provides all required information. Dalmore will generally review all subscription agreements on the same day, but not later than the day after the submission of the subscription agreement.

All funds tendered (by check, wire, credit card, debit card, or electronic funds transfer via ACH to the specified account) by investors will be deposited into a segregated account at DealMaker for the benefit of the Company. The Company has engaged DealMaker to act as a funds collection agent for receipt of funds from investors for this Offering. There is no minimum to disburse funds from the segregated account at DealMaker and the Company will maintain a discretionary schedule for release into its operating accounts. All funds received by wire transfer will be made available immediately while funds transferred by ACH will be restricted for a minimum of three days to clear the banking system prior to deposit into the designated account.

The Company maintains the right to accept or reject subscriptions in whole or in part, for any reason or for no reason, including, but not limited to, in the event that an investor fails to provide all necessary information, even after further requests from the Company, in the event an investor fails to provide requested follow up information to complete background checks or fails background checks, and in the event the Company receives oversubscriptions in excess of the maximum offering amount.

In the interest of allowing interested investors as much time as possible to complete the paperwork associated with a subscription, the Company has not set a maximum period of time to decide whether to accept or reject a subscription. If a subscription is rejected, funds will not be accepted by wire transfer or ACH, and payments made by debit card, credit card or check will be returned to subscribers within 30 days of such rejection without deduction or interest. Upon acceptance of a subscription, the Company will send a confirmation of such acceptance to the subscriber.

Dalmore has not investigated the desirability or advisability of investment in the shares nor approved, endorsed or passed upon the merits of purchasing the Units. Dalmore is not participating as an underwriter and under no circumstance will it solicit any investment in the company, recommend the Company’s securities or provide investment advice to any prospective investor, or make any securities recommendations to investors. Dalmore is not distributing any offering circulars or making any oral representations concerning this offering circular or this offering. Based upon Dalmore’s anticipated limited role in this offering, it has not and will not conduct extensive due diligence of this offering and no investor should rely on the involvement of Dalmore in this offering as any basis for a belief that it has done extensive due diligence. Dalmore does not expressly or impliedly affirm the completeness or accuracy of the offering statement and/or offering circular presented to investors by the Company. All inquiries regarding this offering should be made directly to the Company.

Upon confirmation that an investor’s funds have cleared, the Company will instruct the Transfer Agent to issue shares to the investor. The Transfer Agent will notify an investor when shares are ready to be issued and the Transfer Agent has set up an account for the investor.

Transfer Agent

The Company intends to engage VStock Transfer, LLC, a registered transfer agent with the SEC (the “Transfer Agent”), who will serve as transfer agent to maintain shareholder information on a book-entry basis; there are no set up costs for this service, fees for this service will be limited to secondary market activity. The Company uses VStock Transfer, LLC as its regular transfer agent. The Company estimates the aggregate fee due to the transfer agent for the above services to be $45,000 annually.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, including working capital. Additional specific uses include:

No proceeds will be used to compensate, make loans, or otherwise make payments to officers or directors of the issuer or any of its subsidiaries. However, we reserve our discretion to use certain portion of the offering proceeds to retire some of the Company’s existing debts. As of the date of this circular, we plan to use part of the net proceeds to retire the following debts: 1) On September 1, 2020, we issued and sold to Diamond Investment Group II LLC (“Diamond Investment II”), a convertible redeemable note in the original principal amount of $157,500 (the “Diamond Investment II Note”), which bears an interest rate of 8% per annum and shall be payable along with the principal amount on September 1, 2021. 2) On December 31, 2019, we issued and sold to Vista Capital Investments, LLC (“Vista Capital”) a 8% convertible note in the original principal amount of $275,000 (the “Vista Note”), and a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On August 5, 2020, Vista Capital and the Company amended the Vista Note, which shall be payable with 8% annual interest rate and the increased principal amount of $302,500 on October 31, 2020, ten months from December 31, 2019. On October 29, 2020, we entered into an Allonge #2 to the Vista Note (the “Allonge #2”), pursuant to which the maturity date of the Vista Note was extended to thirteen months from December 31, 2019, the principal amount of the Vista Note was increased by an additional 10% to $332,750 and the Company issued 50,000 shares of its Common Stock to Vista Capital as consideration for the extension of the maturity date of the Note. 3) On September 22, 2020, we issued and sold to Auctus Fund, LLC (“Auctus”), a convertible promissory note in the original aggregate principal amount of $600,000 (the “Auctus Note”), which bears an interest rate of 12% per annum and shall mature on September 22, 2021 (the “Auctus Note Maturity Date”). Pursuant to the terms of the Auctus Note, we shall include a full year of interest in the principal amount of the Note payable on the Auctus Note Maturity Date regardless of any prepayments and the payments for the original aggregate principal amount shall be made in six (6) installments each in the amount of US$100,000.00 commencing one hundred and eighty (180) days following September 22, 2020 and continuing thereafter each thirty (30) days for five (5) months. The final payment of the principal amount and accrued and unpaid interest shall be due on the Auctus Note Maturity Date. On September 22, 2020, we received $100,000 in the principal amount of the Auctus Note and on October 19, 2020 receive $420,000 from Auctus with the issuance of $500,000 in the principal amount of the Auctus Note.

We used and are using the proceeds from the Diamond Investment II Note, Vista Note and Auctus Note in the following areas of our operations:

As of the date of this offering circular, we cannot specify with certainty all of the particular uses of the proceeds from this offering. Pending the use of the net proceeds from this offering as described above, we intend to invest the net proceeds in investment-grade, interest-bearing instruments.

The use of the proceeds represents management’s estimates based upon current business and economic conditions. We reserve the right to use of the net proceeds we receive in the offering in any manner we consider to be appropriate. Although we do not contemplate changes in the proposed use of proceeds, to the extent we find that adjustment is required for other uses by reason of existing business conditions, the use of proceeds may be adjusted.

DILUTION

As of the date of this Offering Statement, an aggregate of 19,478,258 shares of Common Stock are issued and outstanding.

If you purchase Units in this Offering, your ownership interest in our Common Stock will be diluted immediately, to the extent of the difference between the offering price for each Unit in this Offering and the net tangible book value per share of our Common Stock after this Offering.

Our net tangible book value as of June 30, 2020 was negative $3,619,672, or negative $0.19 per share, based on 19,478,258 shares of Common Stock outstanding. Net tangible book value per share equals the amount of our total tangible assets less total liabilities, divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding, all as of the date specified.

If the Maximum Offering Amount, at an offering price of $9.00 per Unit or $1.80 per share of Common Stock, is sold in this Offering, after deducting approximately $227,000 at most in offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value at June 30, 2020 would be approximately $6,153,328, or $0.25 per share. This amount represents an immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value of $0.44 per share to our existing shareholders as of the date of this Offering Circular, and an immediate dilution in pro forma net tangible book value of approximately $1.55 per share to new investors purchasing Units consisting of five Shares and a warrant in this Offering at a price of $9.00 per Unit or $1.80 per share of Common Stock.

The following table illustrates the approximate per share dilution to new investors discussed above, assuming the sale of, respectively, 100%, 50% and 25% of the Units offered for sale in this Offering (after deducting our estimated offering expenses in various scenarios):

The following tables set forth, assuming the sale of, respectively, 100%, 50% and 25% of the Units offered for sale in this Offering, the total number of shares previously sold to existing shareholders during the twelve months prior to the date of this Circular, including shares issued for services, the total consideration paid for the foregoing (based on cash actually received and the value of shares issued for services), and the respective percentages applicable to such purchased shares and consideration paid based on an average price of $0.62 per share paid by our existing shareholders or as the value of shares issued for services and $9.00 per Unit paid by investors in this Offering.

The foregoing tables and calculations exclude a maximum of 1,111,111 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of Warrants as part of the Units, which are exercisable at an exercise price of $2.25 per share.

OUR BUSINESS

Overview

We are a neurodiagnostic and predictive technology platform company seeking to provide a centralized platform for data acquisition and analysis of electroencephalography (“EEG”) data that combines innovative medical device technologies with cloud-based telehealth services. The Company is primarily focused on establishing diagnostic protocols through the use of its Products to identify pathological risk factors involving the brain, and driving novel insights into cognitive health that support early treatment of neurological disorders.

We believe our approach is unique in utilizing medical, consumer and hybrid technologies to create the value chain to ultimate

health:

The Company is initially targeting brain data acquisition via the EEG medical market because it offers high revenue potential due to the established healthy base of customer users with a broad demographic profile. Our technology solution combines a miniature, wireless, clinical device capable of recording electroencephalograms (EEG) that is fast, portable, and easy-to-use with the capability to integrate an interpretive cloud-based platform allowing for rapid and remote interpretation. The NeuroEEG™ Hardware Platform for data collection and NeuroCap™ Software-like Consumables for data collection is expected to enjoy healthy margins and a business-to-business (B2B) direct market opportunity with hospitals, neurologist, general practitioners as well as the various tele health and tele neurology companies.

This brain monitoring system is designed for use in physicians’ offices, sports fields, wellness centers and anywhere else that benefits from rapid EEG testing.

Recent Events

COVID-19 Pandemic

With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, we are promoting the use of sanitary medical practice with the NeuroCap, which we believe promotes the use of good, sanitary medical practice and can help flatten the COVID-19 curve.

A recent report from three COVID-19-designated hospitals in Wuhan, China indicated that more than one-third of coronavirus patients had some type of neurologic symptom, including altered consciousness, evidence of skeletal muscle damage, and acute cerebrovascular disease. Early data implies that COVID-19, like prior coronavirus breakouts MERS and SARS, is demonstrating a neurologic component in severe cases.

As hospitals and other first responders to the pandemic around the world increase their purchases of supplies to fight the virus, and the U.S. government has passed a $2 trillion aid package to prop up the country’s economy and assist in fighting the virus, we are working to position our NeuroCap as a safe and effective diagnostic tool to help against the COVID-19 virus.

Information in this circular is based on available information from prior to the pandemic. We have not yet been able to evaluate how the pandemic has or may continue to affect our business and operations, including the potential markets for our Products.

In 2019, we commenced acting as a distributor of third-party medical devices in Russia (including those purchased from a company affiliated with one of our officers and directors), which resulted in all of our revenue for 2019. While we intend to continue the sale of third party medical devices, we do not intend for it to be our primary source of revenue in the long-term and expect to curtail or cease this line of operations as, if and when we commence generating material, recurring revenues from our Products, of which we can give no assurance. We also can give no assurance that any revenue we generate from so acting as a distributor of third-party medical devices will continue, will continue to be material or will be sufficient to enable us to continue our operations. We have no supply or distribution agreements in place with respect to such business. In the event that we see an opportunity to sell such products, we procure them and then re-sell them.

History

We were initially organized on November 18, 2013 as a Nevada limited liability company under the name Global Energy Express LLC by the filing of articles of organization with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada. On December 18, 2015, the Company converted from a Nevada limited liability company under the name Global Energy Express LLC to a Nevada corporation under the name All Soft Gels Inc. by the filing of articles of conversion and articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada. On September 18, 2018, the Company changed its name from All Soft Gels Inc. to Brain Scientific Inc. and changed its ticker symbol on the OTC Market to “BRSF”.

On September 21, 2018, we entered into a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) with MemoryMD, Inc. and AFGG Acquisition Corp. to acquire MemoryMD, Inc. (the “Acquisition”). The transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement were consummated on September 21, 2018 and, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, all outstanding shares of MemoryMD were exchanged for shares of our common stock. Accordingly, we acquired 100% of Memory MD, Inc. in exchange for the issuance of shares of our common stock and MemoryMD, Inc. became our wholly-owned subsidiary. Furthermore, the Company at such time ceased all operations and assigned all of its assets and liabilities from prior to the Acquisition, and assumed and commenced the business of MemoryMD as the sole business of the Company.

Our principal executive office is located at 205 East 42nd Street, 14th Floor, New York, New York 10017, and our telephone number is (646) 388-3788. Our website address is www.brainscientific.com. The information on our website is not part of this circular.

Introduction to Data Acquisition using Electroencephalography (EEG)

Electroencephalography, or EEG, is a method to identify and evaluate the electrical activity of the brain. The ability to do this dates back to the mid-to-late 19th century when scientists began to study the brain activity of various animals such as rabbits, dogs, and monkeys. The 1920’s saw the first example of these involving humans, when in 1924 German physiologist and psychiatrist Hans Berger recorded the first human EEG.

One of the first discoveries was the EEG’s ability to identify the potential for epileptic seizures. As science and scientists began to understand the workings of the EEG, they could identify more beneficial applications of the technology working in combination with other tests. These include:

The EEG may also be used to determine the electrical activity of the brain of an individual involved in a trauma, addiction, as well as the brain activity of comatose individuals.

It is here in the advancement of technology where we believe our products and technology will play a key role in the use and development of EEG related activities.

Product and Services Pipeline

Our data acquisition platform is composed of three main parts:

NeuroEEG

NeuroEEG™ is an FDA cleared 16 channel, portable, cloud-enabled data acquisition platform for electroencephalogram (EEG) activity. This wireless system digitizes and records electrophysiological activity at 500Hz, and is further supported by advanced artifact filtering allowing for the cleanest signal possible. The intuitive nature of the device democratizes EEG as a viable diagnostic tool that can be implemented across environments that were formerly inaccessible by traditional EEG solutions. NeuroEEG™ is designed for use in mobile (ambulatory care & emergency medical service vehicles), field applications (clinical trials), as well as hospital and athletic environments.

NeuroEEG™ is non-invasive and is intended to acquire, display and store the electrical activity of a patient’s brain on a computer (PC or laptop). The generated data serves as a clinical assessment aid within a clinical practice, rehabilitation institution, diagnostic center, neurosurgical clinics, operating room, intensive care unit, and emergency room environments. Data acquired by NeuroEEG™ is to be analyzed under the direction and interpretation of a licensed medical professional. This device does not provide any diagnostic conclusion about a subject’s condition. The NeuroEEG is designed to be used with our NeuroCap but can also work with other existing brands and models of caps or with no cap at all.

The Company commenced delivery of its first purchase order of this product in the fourth quarter of 2018, although it has not had any further material orders to date.

NeuroCap

The NeuroCap™ is an FDA cleared disposable, soft layered cap with an integrated electrode circuit that is designed to address existing problems of conventional EEG systems. The silver embedded wiring is pre-gelled, so it requires no prepping of the skin before application. NeuroCap™ makes it possible for medical staff of all levels to perform EEG tests, without having to laboriously apply electrodes one-by-one or spend considerable time cleaning an EEG headset after each use.

The NeuroCap™ works in parallel with the NeuroEEG™ amplifier device to successfully carry out EEG tests. However, the NeuroCap™ can work also with other existing EEG devices and not just our NeuroEEG. NeuroCap’s electrode placement follow standard alignment pursuant to the international 10-20 system. The acquisition of electrical brain activity is carried out by non-invasive pre-gelled passive Ag/AgCl scalp (cutaneous) electrodes, ensuring maximum comfortability for the wearer.

We received our first purchaser order for the NeuroCap from a distributor of medical supplies for testing purposes and commenced shipping product in the fourth quarter of 2018 to several hospitals and other customers, although we have not had any further material orders to date.

NeuroNet Cloud

Our NeuroNet Cloud infrastructure is being designed to provide for a robust platform to store and manage all forms of data that may be received from internal and external entities such as EHRs/EMRs, IOT devices and 3rd party apps, clinical applications and other forms of patient data. The NeuroNet Cloud is also being designed to provide for streamlined connectivity, allowing secured access to patient data for purposes of evaluation and reporting by outside clinical specialists, such as a neurologists. The NeuroNet Cloud platform is being designed to be able to process data from the NeuroEEG and NeuroCar products, as well as other existing EEG systems.

The Company is also developing a HIPAA-compliant data storage and patient management cloud infrastructure to provide teleneurology services. The infrastructure is being designed so neurologists will be able to remotely access patient EEG and clinical data to evaluate patient conditions. We believe that such an infrastructure removes the need for direct contact with the patient, opening up underserved geographic locations with an undersupply of physicians to meet growing demand for neurological care as aging patient populations continues to grow.

Data is acquired via the 16 channel NeuroCap™ and would be wirelessly transmitted to the cloud, via the NeuroEEG™, as batch data (fully transferred before being consumed) or in real-time (data is consumed as it is being produced). It is also being designed to process information from other EEG systems.

Data can then be consumed by a doctor or specialist who can recover the data, replay, and provide feedback, such as a report, on the selected patient data. This infrastructure is configurable to match unique workflows of healthcare operators.

As designed, the MemoryMD™ cloud would then be able to cross-reference multiple points-of-data:

We expect to have a fully working model of the NeuroNet Cloud by the end of 2020, subject to the availability of funds as it is not our priority product.

Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure

Our infrastructure is also being designed to gather and mine brain-imaging data. Clinicians and researchers would be able to access data profiles of their patients and generate risk assessment and treatment plans to address neurological conditions. This data could also be useful in establishing correlations between a myriad of brain scans, allowing us to further understand connections about the brain that have not been discovered.

Artificial intelligence infrastructure in the Company cloud refers to all modules used to perform automatic analysis of patient data. This infrastructure can receive inputs from many different sources such as medical databases, normative data sets, and other patient health information. By using machine-learning algorithms, the system is being designed to improve accuracy, providing for more advanced diagnostics as additional brain images are acquired.

The infrastructure is being designed to combine neural networks with a state-of-the-art tree search and pattern classification systems to build robust neurological health profiles of patient brain scans. These models are expected to be self-learning, so the more data supplied to it, to more “educated” it is expected to be.

We believe we will achieve better patient outcomes at a reduced cost through robust modelling and correlational analysis of brain imaging and other biometric data. Significant patterns recognized by the system are designed to help medical professionals detect nuances in an individual brain, allowing them to tailor more personalized treatment plans for their patients. The MemoryMD™ cloud is being designed to handle millions of brain images to create robust models that correlate health records, behaviors, and other neurological factors.

Intellectual Property

Protection of our intellectual property is a strategic priority for our business. We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets as well as nondisclosure and assignment of invention agreements, material transfer agreements, confidentiality agreements and other measures to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights.

Patents and trademarks are significant to our business to the extent that a Product or an attribute of a Product represents a unique design or process. Patent protection restricts competitors from duplicating unique designs and features. To protect our proprietary secrets and competitive technologies, we have obtained and are seeking to further obtain patent, trade secret, trademark and other intellectual property protection on our Products whenever appropriate. As of the date of this circular, the Company has applied for one U.S. nonprovisional patent titled “Apparatus And Method For Conducting Electroencephalography” (Application No.: 15/898,611), one Chinese patent titled “Apparatus and Method for Conducting Electroencephalography” (Application No.: 201880002338.7), and one European patent titled “Apparatus And Method For Conducting Electroencephalography” (Application No.: 18757492.6), all of which relate to our NeuroCap Product. All of which, are pending and if approved would expire in 2037.

We also own two registered trademarks (Neuro EEG and NeuroCap) and have pending applications for two additional trademark registrations (Brain Scientific and Memory MD).

In May 2018, we entered into a Patent Assignment and License Back Agreement with Boris Goldstein, our Chairman, Secretary and Executive Vice President, Dmitriy Prilutskiy, Stanislav Zabodaev and Medical Computer Systems Ltd. Pursuant to the agreement, among other things, Messrs. Goldstein, Prilutskiy and Zabodaev assigned all of their rights to a patent entitled “Apparatus And Method For Conducting Electroencephalography” (Application No.: 15/898,611), to our Company, and in return, we granted to Medical Computer Systems Ltd., an unaffiliated entity who also provides manufacturing services to us, a limited, royalty-free, fully paid-up, worldwide, nonexclusive license (without the right to sublicense or assign), to the patent, to practice, make and use the inventions, ideas and information embodied therein, and to make, use, offer to sell, sell, lease or import products, services, processes, methods and materials embodying or deriving from the inventions, ideas and information from the patent and any activities derived directly therefrom; provided, however, that if and upon FDA approval of a Product, Medical Computer Systems’ aforementioned rights shall be limited to manufacturing and sales solely to our Company or on our behalf provided that we purchase from Medical Computer Systems (and Medical Computer Systems makes available for sale) a minimum of 20,000 units of Products per calendar year on reasonable terms and conditions to be determined by the parties in good faith; provided further, however, that Medical Computer Systems can without any limitation sell products embodying or deriving from the inventions, ideas and information from the patent in (i) the territories that made up the former USSR (excluding the Baltic countries) and (ii) Japan. In furtherance of the foregoing first proviso, in the event we fail to purchase the annual minimum order for a particular calendar year, Medical Computer Systems’ limitation to manufacture and sell Products only to our Company pursuant to this proviso shall be suspended for the next calendar year.

Industry Overview

The Company competes within the domestic and global medical device industry, referred to as the “MedTech” industry, which industry, on a global scale, is expected to reach an estimated $432.6 billion by 2025, and it is forecast to grow at a CAGR of 4.1% from 2020 to 2025.

The MedTech industry is characterized by rapid change resulting from technological advances and scientific discoveries. We believe that U.S. medical device companies are highly regarded on a global scale for their innovations and high-technology products, which innovations and products are produced due to a significant investment in research and development. U.S. sales are expected to grow from about $164 billion in 2018 to $208 billion in 2023, according to Fitch.

The global brain monitoring market is expected to reach $11.6 billion by 2024 from $8.7 billion in 2019, at a CAGR of 6.1% during the forecast period. We believe the increasing incidence and prevalence of neurological disorders, rising awareness about neurodegenerative disorders, growing incidence of traumatic brain injuries, and the increasing applications of brain monitoring in clinical trials are driving the growth of this market. In addition, of this global market, the traumatic brain injury diagnostic market size was estimated at approximately $38 million and it is expected to reach approximately $166 million by the end of 2025, with a CAGR of 23.6%.

Traumatic brain injury holds the largest share of the brain monitoring market, by disease type. Some of the major factors responsible for the large share of this market include the growing incidence of TBIs across the globe, leading to the high demand for the management of these cases—which we believe requires the intensive use of brain monitoring devices.

We believe the hospitals segment has accounted for the largest share of the brain monitoring market in 2019. Brain monitoring is a complex process, requiring expensive and advanced devices and equipment that are mainly found only in hospitals. Hospitals also see a considerably larger inflow of patients as compared to small clinics and other end users. Additionally, brain monitoring devices pose a considerable burden in terms of maintenance expenses on healthcare facilities; we believe that in general hospitals, more than other end users, are able to bear such costs. Hence, brain monitoring devices are mostly used in hospitals, which consequently account for the largest market share.

U.S. Healthcare Market

The National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA) are the official estimates of total health care spending in the United States. U.S. health care spending grew 4.6 percent in 2018, reaching $3.6 trillion or $11,172 per person. As a share of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product, health spending accounted for 17.7%.

Digital health innovations are driving growth and opportunity in three major verticals of healthcare:

Athletic Performance Market

Athletic performance encompasses the treatment and prevention of injuries related to athletics and exercise.

The growth of this market can be attributed to increased participation in athletic activities, thus leading to an increased risk of injuries. Also, government support for participation in athletics to combat high obesity rates is expected to boost participation in athletics.

Our business plan includes positioning our products and services as a go-to choice in diagnostic tools for brain-related sports injuries. The EEG with cortical brain maps is highly capable of identifying post-concussion syndrome. Concussions and traumatic brain injuries caused by contact sports are a growing widespread issue among athletes. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention has reported that 1.6 million to 3.8 million concussions occur each year.

If left undetected, concussions can lead to long-term brain damage and may even be fatal. Without professional doctors to survey the true damage of the head impact, athletes often ignore head impacts and later suffer from the consequences. Since an estimated 90% of diagnosed concussions do not include a loss of consciousness, many head impact injuries are dismissed. To prevent these outcomes, it is critical that coaches and players are aware of the dangers of contact sports and are able to conduct a proper concussion evaluation. The growing number of sports related brain injuries suggests that there is an unmet demand for a quick assessment and delivery of brain damage, which we believe our products and services can provide.

Government Initiatives – Pre COVID 19 Pandemic

Although the Covid-19 pandemic has abruptly changed the world, which we hope is temporary, prior to the outbreak, there was a surge of regional tensions and national security threats and many countries, including the United States, were increasing defense budgets. Also, prior to the pandemic, we expected that stable growth in global GDP, lower commodity prices, and an increase in travel demand could lead to more defense spending as well as investing in next generation military equipment and technology to combat terrorism and cyber-threats. While many of those expectations and paradigms have now changed, we expect that they will return as the pandemic is contained and the world economy rebounds.

The Defense Advanced Research Project Agency supports the Brain Initiative, which is a program designed to revolutionize the understanding of the human brain to find new ways to treat, cure, and prevent brain disorders. We believe our product and service offerings can be an asset in providing millions of brain scans that allow for research and analysis. In addition to the Brain Initiative and other Government sponsored research and grants, our scalable, easy to use EEG can serve the military and can be deployed in the field for either proactive brain monitoring or reactive emergency response.

Education Enhancement

Global education and training expenditures are estimated to reach approximately $10 trillion by 2030 as population growth and technology in developing markets is expected to fuel a massive expansion in education, and training.

The growth in the market is due to an increase in the attendance of students, the promotion of online learning, a rise in tuition costs, an escalation of graduation rates, and an expansion of scientific research. Parents are willing to spend on education for their children and government initiated awareness programs promote the importance of education. The US is one of the most efficient, and therefore desired, destinations for educational purposes. In the United States, higher growth opportunity and better career prospects reinforce the need for education and research.

Since analysis of EEGs are useful in recognizing cognitive differences, the brain scans of the up-to 50 million potential customers in this space can be a stepping stone for further research. Furthermore, the cognitive measurements of EEGs are useful in assessing the effectiveness of an educational program. Conclusions drawn from the analysis can then be further applied in the classroom in the future. The goal of selling to the education market is to have the opportunity to measure baseline EEGs of students. The baseline EEGs can serve in multiple studies, including those that evaluate the best methods of teaching and learning in the classroom. Some additional uses of EEGs within the education market include research and analysis into the brain images of students with learning disabilities. 

Clinical Trials

The global healthcare contract research organization market size is expected to reach approximately $62.1 billion by 2027, registering a CAGR of 6.6% over the same period, primarily resulting from the increasing cost of drug development. Rising cost of clinical trials and challenges pertaining to patient recruitment have led biopharmaceutical companies to turn to regions like Central and Eastern Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East for cost savings and quick patient recruitment.

Clinical trials assess the safety and efficacy of a new drug, therapy, surgical procedure, medical device, or other intervention and are essential tools in conducting research. When used in clinical trials, we expect our products and services will give a fast and accurate analysis that may speed the clinical trial process. Moreover, clinical imaging is the technique and process of capturing images of the human body for clinical purposes to reveal, diagnose or examine diseases. Our EEG is a clinical imaging tool that can acquire millions of clinical images stored on a cloud infrastructure. A vast number of clinical images can assist in revealing, diagnosing, and examining neurological conditions.

The Global Telemedicine Market/Industry

In addition to the MedTech industry, we are also seeking to participate within the rapidly expanding global telemedicine industry/market. This industry focuses on the delivery of healthcare services, consultations and advice to patients wherever they are through the means of technology, software mediated video and data portals. We believe that there is and will continue to be significant demand for such services given the need to match physicians with patients in remote areas or without having patients travel long distances to access the care they need. We also believe that there is a major need within this industry to also provide point of care diagnostic, which we are seeking to develop as a niche, especially within neurology.

The global telemedicine market was estimated at approximately $31.5 billion in 2018 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 19.28% by 2025.

Factors, such as rising emergency medical incidents and ageing world population, are anticipated to drive such growth. North America is anticipated to account for a significant portion of market share, and the U.S. is expected to be the largest telemedicine market in North America over this period. The Europe telemedicine market is also expected to grow substantially, due to factors such as rising cost of healthcare and rising prevalence of chronic diseases, while Asia-Pacific is projected to record the fastest growth over such period.

Market Dynamics

Driver: Growing incidence of traumatic brain injuries

A traumatic brain injury (“TBI”) is non-degenerative, non-congenital damage to the brain from an external mechanical force, possibly leading to permanent or temporary impairment. TBI is a major public health concern, and the most common cause of death and disability in developed as well as developing countries.

According to the CDC, TBI is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, responsible for approximately 2.8 million accidents and emergency department visits annually in the U.S. and approximately 1 million in the UK. It is one of the most common causes of mortality in people aged under 25, and its incidence is high in adults and very young children, as well. However, the rate of TBI-related hospitalizations and deaths is the highest in the elderly. According to Headway, in 2016–2017, there were 348,453 hospital admissions related to brain injuries in the UK. 

TBI, if ignored, can lead to permanent disabilities or death. Close monitoring and immediate therapy for related abnormalities are crucial to reducing the rate of mortality or morbidity associated with TBIs. As intercranial pressure monitoring (ICP) is the most common cause of death in patients with severe TBI, ICP monitoring is considered as the standard of care. The growing incidence of TBIs is, therefore, likely to support market growth.

Opportunity: Increasing Expanding therapeutic applications of brain monitoring devices

Apart from applications in neurological disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, and psychiatric disorders, brain monitoring devices are also used in other therapeutic areas like insomnia, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and sleep apnea. Quantitative EEG analysis is widely used to investigate the neurophysiological characteristics of insomnia. EEG biofeedback is a training process that has been scientifically proven to aid in the management of PTSD.

A number of research studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of neurofeedback for PTSD in adults. For instance, a research study published by the NCBI in 2016 demonstrated that 24 sessions of neurofeedback significantly reduced PTSD symptoms in adult sample populations. Similar studies are also being conducted in children. Such positive research outcomes suggest that neurofeedback is a promising approach in the treatment of PTSD. This is especially important because existing treatments can be quite difficult to tolerate and have limited effectiveness for many individuals with PTSD. In addition, EEG is routinely used to measure and record brain wave activity for the diagnosis and treatment of sleep apnea. These extended applications of brain monitoring devices are expected to provide growth opportunities for players operating in this market.

Challenge: Shortage of trained professionals

Trained medical personnel are required to effectively operate devices involved in the complex process of brain monitoring. The positioning of electrodes on the scalp and the insertion of muscular needles require accuracy and can be performed only by highly trained personnel. In addition, the results generated by brain monitoring machines are complex and can only be interpreted by qualified technicians or skilled professionals. Without these fundamental skills, end users will face difficulties in maximizing the utility of their brain monitoring equipment. The presence of highly skilled medical personnel and staff is, therefore, vital for the effective use of brain monitoring equipment.

Currently, there is a shortage of skilled medical personnel in both developed and developing countries. It has been estimated that the United States will see a shortage of up to nearly 122,000 physicians by 2032 as demand for physicians continues to grow faster than supply, Furthermore, according to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, there is a projected shortage of registered nurses in the US, and it is expected to intensify by 2030. Moreover, the shortage of trained and experienced neurodiagnostic technologists globally has compelled hospitals to cross-train other allied health professionals to perform neurodiagnostic examinations. This presents a key challenge for the growth of the global brain monitoring devices market.

We believe the market remains fragmented as many medical practices rely on dated technology and complicated brain monitoring solutions. We also believe that the overpricing and technological barriers currently existing in the market make our innovative EEG platform truly disruptive by being both user friendly and cost effective.

Competition

Our Products face a mixture of competitors ranging from large manufacturers with multiple business lines to small manufacturers offering a limited selection of products and services. Many of the competitors whom we directly compete with include companies who develop or intend to develop medical EEG products with FDA clearance to support clinical diagnosis of brain disorders. Our indirect competitors offer similar products and services, but target audiences in the clinical research and consumer solutions markets, as opposed to the medical solution market the Company targets. These indirect competitors are largely focused on the development of EEG products for research, consumer, and athletic application.

Major shifts in industry market share have occurred in connection with product problems, physician advisories, safety alerts, and publications about MedTech products, reflecting the importance of product quality, product efficacy, and quality systems in the medical device industry. In addition, in the current environment of managed care, economically motivated customers, consolidation among health care providers, increased competition, and declining reimbursement rates, the Company anticipates an increasing need to compete on the basis of price and quality. In order to continue to compete effectively, we must continue to create or acquire advanced technology, incorporate this technology into our current and future proprietary Products, obtain regulatory approvals in a timely manner, maintain high-quality manufacturing processes, and successfully market these Products. Some of these initiatives include, but are not limited to, creating integrated cloud solutions that connect specialists with generalists for simple data transfer and analysis, streamlining clinical diagnoses with new medical devices, and opening up revenue streams from secondary healthcare markets, such as primary care medical professionals who utilize EEG analyses in their practices.

The medical device companies who we deem as competitors include the following, along with a description of their business based on publicly available information:

Other EEG makers that we may compete against include Ceribell, Biosignal Group and Zeto. The major U.S. medical device companies who we deem as competitors include Baxter, Beckman Coulter, Becton Dickinson, Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare Technologies, Johnson & Johnson, St. Jude, Stryker Corporation, and Medtronic. Many of the companies against which we may compete in the future have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and diagnostic industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller or early stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and subject registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our development.

We intend to compete based on our belief in the superiority of our products and services in functionality, cost-effectiveness, efficiency, ease of use and accuracy.

Because our business plan contemplates servicing the neurotech industry across multiple platforms including hardware, software, service and cloud computing, and our existing and proposed product and service platforms are in a growing industry, we believe we are in a position to take a leadership position within the sector due to our:

Market Application

For neurologists and other health providers, we aim to provide a solution for monitoring patient health and safety across a variety of locations including the hospital, specialized clinics, and home settings. In managing patients with epilepsy, providers can improve in areas concerning patient re-admittance, patient mortality and morbidity. Providers can also proactivity prevent the onset of negative chronic health conditions by engaging with at-risk populations at a fraction of the cost by implementing our affordable EEG solutions.

For health providers, our offering of an EEG monitoring solution could ease data collection efforts. By providing an accurate and consistent stream of EEG data, our products and services are being designed to allow physicians and other health professionals to make use of newly available bio-metric data to improve diagnosis, treatment and management of various neurological illnesses, effectively increasing the quality and value add of medical services.

Our portability and integration potential augment the existing suite of remote monitoring solutions, allowing physicians to more accurately differentiate between nuanced neurological conditions happening within and outside the hospital setting. An example includes helping neurologist’s contrast nocturnal epilepsy patterns across other sleep disorders such as parasomnias where individuals engage in abnormal movements during sleep.

Furthermore, we believe a range of medical based applications can be created in conjunction with our EEG solutions around managing patient behavior, offering incentives and parameters for individuals. By understanding what is going on with their brain and being alerted when discrepancies occur, we believe that physicians will be able to better communicate health information, improving the effectiveness and relationship between physicians and patients in improving health outcomes, and individuals with the support of their physicians will be able to better regulate targeted mental states or emotions reducing the sole reliance on on-site visits to hospitals for mental health treatment plans.

Sales and Marketing

We have commenced the commercial roll-out of the NeuroEEG™ and NeuroCap™, on a limited basis, initially targeting the United States market following with Canada market. We expect the following developmental milestones to be completed within the next 24 months, subject to cash availability:

We are identifying additional long-term partners to accelerate market penetration, product diversification, and ultimate survivability across targeted verticals. Through new implementations of our EEG products and services, we expect to retain and capture additional market share through continuous enhancements.

We plan to utilize partner relationships and co-marketing opportunities as the initial driver of our marketing efforts, thereby benefiting from increased speed-to-market, as well as the ability to leverage a pre-existing audience/customer base and communications channels. We expect to offer to early adopters our products and services at preferential rates in exchange for expediting development, distribution, and sales of such products and services.

Our marketing and sales strategy is focused on rapid, cost-effective delivery of high-quality products into the U.S. and international healthcare market. The sales strategy is based on penetrating the neurology and diagnostic imaging subsectors of the MedTech industry market via planned medical device distributor arrangements or partnering on distribution of NeuroCaps through existing EEG manufacturers, and expanding into nursing homes and primary care practices. Included amongst the customers to whom we intend to market and sell our Products through distributors and partners (B2B), are individual physicians, medical practices, urgent care facilities, physician associations, and other medical professionals and medical professional groups, hospitals, health clinics, nursing homes, physical rehabilitation centers, addiction rehabilitation centers and other medical institutions, athletic organizations, and colleges, universities, and other academic institutions. To date, we have not entered into any distribution or partnership arangements.

We intend for our products’ initial entry into the market would be at emergency departments, ICU’s and other acute care settings in the United States.

We will also be looking at forming partnerships with national and global telemedicine and teleneurology companies in order to leverage their relationships, to access our target end-users. This would allow our initial entry into the rapidly growing global telemedicine and teleneurology markets.

As we grow, we intend to expand to global distributors, Group Purchasing Organizations (GPOs) of medical supplies, and Independent Physician Associations (IPAs) to scale business operations. At this time, we do not provide financing for potential customers, but we are evaluating implementing a leasing program.

We do not at this time have plans to have direct sales or hire a direct sales force.

Reimbursement

Coverage in the United States

Reimbursement from private third-party healthcare payors and, to a lesser extent, Medicare will be an important element of our success. Although the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, or CMS, and third-party payors have adopted coverage policies for our targeted indications, there is no guarantee this will continue at the same levels or at all in the future.

Regarding ICD-10 codes, the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) is a clinical cataloging system that went into effect for the U.S. healthcare industry on Oct. 1, 2015, after a series of lengthy delays. Accounting for modern advances in clinical treatment and medical devices, ICD-10 codes offer many more classification options compared to those found in its predecessor, ICD-9. Within the healthcare industry, providers, coders, IT professionals, insurance carriers, government agencies and others use ICD codes to properly note diseases on health records, to track epidemiological trends and to assist in medical reimbursement decisions.

We believe that many of the indications we are pursuing with our technologies are currently reimbursed on a widespread basis by Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance companies.

Medicare, Medicaid, health maintenance organizations and other third-party payors are increasingly attempting to contain healthcare costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement of new medical devices, and, as a result, their coverage policies may be restrictive, or they may not cover or provide adequate payment for our Products. In order to obtain reimbursement arrangements, we may have to agree to a net sales price lower than the net sales price we might charge in other sales channels. Our revenue may be limited by the continuing efforts of government and third-party payors to contain or reduce the costs of healthcare through various increasingly sophisticated means, such as requiring prospective reimbursement and second opinions, purchasing in groups, or redesigning benefits. Our future dependence on the commercial success of our technologies makes us particularly susceptible to any cost containment or reduction efforts. Accordingly, unless government and other third-party payors provide adequate coverage and reimbursement for our Products and the related insertion and removal procedures, our financial performance may be limited.

Coverage Outside the United States

If we seek to commercialize our Products in countries outside the United States, coverage may be available from certain governmental authorities, private health insurance plans, and labor unions. Coverage systems in international markets vary significantly by country and, within some countries, by region. If we seek to commercialize our technology, if approved, outside the U.S., coverage approvals must be obtained on a country-by-country, region-by-region or, in some instances, a case-by case basis. Based on our ongoing evaluation, certain countries reimburse more highly than others.

Manufacturing, Supply and Quality Assurance

We currently outsource the supply and manufacture of all components of our NeuroEEG and NeuroCap. We plan to continue with an outsourced manufacturing arrangement for the foreseeable future. We expect that our third-party manufacturers will be competent to manufacture our Products and have quality systems established that meet FDA requirements. We believe the manufacturers we currently utilize or that we may utilize in the future have sufficient capacity to meet our launch requirements if our technology under development is approved in the future and are able to scale up their capacity relatively quickly with minimal capital investment. We believe that, as we increase our demand in the future, our per unit costs will decrease materially. We have also identified capable second source manufacturers and suppliers in the event of disruption from any of our primary vendors.

Our suppliers meet ISO 13485:2003 certification, which includes design control requirements. As a medical device developer, the facilities of our sterilization and other critical suppliers are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA and corresponding state and foreign agencies. We plan to audit our suppliers periodically to ensure conformity with the specifications, policies and procedures for our devices.

With respect to graphene electrodes, our goal is to start working with specific 3D printers and print prototypes of the next generation electrodes. Upon successful testing, of which we can give no assurance of success, we plan to submit the graphene electrode for biocompatibility testing in 2020/2021 with a follow up application to the FDA in 2021 and projected approval in 2022 with commercial implementation to follow.

Research and Development

Our research and development programs are generally pursued by engineers and scientists employed by us on a full-time basis or hired as per diem consultants or through partnerships with industry leaders in manufacturing and design and researchers and academia. We are also working with subcontractors in developing specific components of our technologies.

The primary objective of our research and development program is to advance the development of our existing and proposed Products, to enhance the commercial value of such Products.

We have incurred research and development costs of $103,616 for the year ended December 31, 2019 and $210,206 for the year ended December 31, 2018. We have commenced evaluating the use of graphene for brain electrodes, with an affiliate of Boris Goldstein, our Chairman of the Board. We believe the main benefits of using graphene for electrodes are:

Potential electronic applications of graphene in EEG include ultra-small transistors, super-dense data storage, touchscreens and a wearable e-tattoo EEG patch. In the energy field, potential applications include ultra-capacitors to store and transmit electrical power as well as highly efficient solar cells. We believe graphene-based batteries in EEG will be able to charge faster and last longer, although we have not commenced any work towards that goal at this time.

We also have formed a Medical Advisory Board. The current members are Dr. John Gaitanis, MD, Tufts Medical Center; and Dr. John Hixson, MD, Associate Professor of Neurology, University of California San Francisco. We intend to grant to such members from time to time equity for the services they provide to us.

Government Regulation

Our NeuroEEG and NeuroCap are each a medical device subject to extensive and ongoing regulation by the FDA, the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, the European Commission, and regulatory bodies in other countries. Regulations cover virtually every critical aspect of a medical device company’s business operations, including research activities, product development, quality and risk management, contracting, reimbursement, medical communications, and sales and marketing. In the United States, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and the implementing regulations of the FDA govern product design and development, pre-clinical and clinical testing, premarket clearance or approval, product manufacturing, quality systems, import and export, product labeling, product storage, recalls and field safety corrective actions, advertising and promotion, product sales and distribution, and post-market clinical surveillance. Our business is subject to federal, state, local, and foreign regulations, such as ISO 13485, ISO 14971, FDA’s Quality System Regulation, or QSR, contained in 21 CFR Part 820, and the European Commission’s Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices and its amendments.

U.S. Regulation

The FDA characterizes medical devices into one of three classes. Devices that are considered by the FDA to pose lower risk are classified as Class I or II. Class I devices and are subject to controls for labeling, pre-market notification and adherence to the FDA’s QSR. This pertains to manufacturers’ methods and documentation of the design, testing, production, control quality assurance, labeling, packaging, sterilization, storage and shipping of products, but are usually exempt from premarket notification requirements. Class II devices are subject to the same general controls but may be subject to special controls such as performance standards, post-market surveillance, FDA guidelines, or particularized labeling, and may also require clinical testing prior to clearance or approval. Class III devices are those for which insufficient information exists to assure safety and effectiveness solely through general or special controls, including devices that support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or which present a potential, unreasonable risk of illness or injury.

Some Class I and Class II devices are exempted by regulation from the pre-market notification requirement under Section 510(k) of the FDCA, also referred to as a 510(k) clearance, and the requirement of compliance with substantially all of the QSR. However, a pre-market approval, or PMA application, is required for devices deemed by the FDA to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or certain implantable devices, or those that are “not substantially equivalent” either to a device previously cleared through the 510(k) process or to a “preamendment” Class III device in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 when PMA applications were not required. The PMA approval process is more comprehensive than the 510(k) clearance process and typically takes several years to complete. While the 510(k) process is typically shorter than a PMA process, both the 510(k) clearance and PMA processes can be expensive and lengthy.

Our NeuroCap device is characterized as a Class I device and our NeuroEEG device is characterized as a Class II device.

FDA review of a PMA application generally takes between one and three years, but may take significantly longer. The FDA can delay, limit or deny approval of a PMA application for many reasons, including:

If an FDA evaluation of a PMA application is favorable, the FDA will either issue an approval letter, or approvable letter, which usually contains a number of conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the PMA. When and if those conditions have been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the FDA, the agency will issue a PMA approval letter authorizing commercial marketing of a device, subject to the conditions of approval and the limitations established in the approval letter. If the FDA’s evaluation of a PMA application or manufacturing facilities is not favorable, the FDA will deny approval of the PMA or issue a not approvable letter. The FDA also may determine that additional tests or clinical trials are necessary, in which case the PMA approval may be delayed for several months or years while the trials are conducted, and data is submitted in an amendment to the PMA. The PMA process can be expensive, uncertain and lengthy and a number of devices for which FDA approval has been sought by other companies have never been approved by the FDA for marketing.

New PMA applications or PMA supplements may be required for modifications to the manufacturing process, labeling, device specifications, materials or design of a device that has been approved through the PMA process. PMA supplements often require submission of the same type of information as an initial PMA application, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the approved PMA application and may or may not require as extensive technical or clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel.

Clinical trials are typically required to support a PMA application and are sometimes required for a 510(k) clearance. These trials generally require submission of an application for an IDE, to the FDA. The IDE application must be supported by appropriate data, such as animal and laboratory testing results, showing that it is safe to test the device in humans and that the testing protocol is scientifically sound. The IDE application must be approved in advance by the FDA for a specified number of patients, unless the product is deemed a non-significant risk device and eligible for abbreviated IDE requirements. Generally, clinical trials for a significant risk device may begin once the IDE application is approved by the FDA and the study protocol and informed consent are approved by appropriate institutional review boards at the clinical trial sites. The FDA’s approval of an IDE allows clinical testing to go forward, but it does not bind the FDA to accept the results of the trial as sufficient to prove the product’s safety and efficacy, even if the trial meets its intended success criteria. All clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s IDE regulations that govern investigational device labeling, prohibit promotion, and specify an array of recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring responsibilities of study sponsors and study investigators. Clinical trials must further comply with the FDA’s regulations for institutional review board approval and for informed consent and other human subject protections. Required records and reports are subject to inspection by the FDA. The results of clinical testing may be unfavorable or, even if the intended safety and efficacy success criteria are achieved, may not be considered sufficient for the FDA to grant approval or clearance of a product. Clinical trials must be entered into the clinical trials registry at clintrials.gov.

The commencement or completion of any clinical trial may be delayed or halted, or be inadequate to support approval of a PMA application, for numerous reasons, including, but not limited to, the following:

International Regulation

International sales of medical devices are subject to local government regulations, which may vary substantially from country to country. The time required to obtain approval in another country may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval, and the requirements may differ. There is a trend towards harmonization of quality system standards among the European Union, United States, Canada and various other industrialized countries.

The primary regulatory body in Europe is that of the European Union, the European Commission, which includes most of the major countries in Europe. Other countries, such as Switzerland, have voluntarily adopted laws and regulations that mirror those of the European Union with respect to medical devices. The European Union has adopted numerous directives and standards regulating the design, manufacture, clinical trials, labeling and adverse event reporting for medical devices. Devices that comply with the requirements of these relevant directives will be entitled to bear the CE conformity marking, indicating that the device conforms to the essential requirements of the applicable directives and, accordingly, can be commercially distributed throughout Europe. The method of assessing conformity varies depending on the class of the product, but normally involves a combination of self-assessment by the manufacturer and a third party assessment by a “Notified Body.” This third-party assessment may consist of an audit of the manufacturer’s quality system and specific testing of the manufacturer’s product. An assessment by a Notified Body of one country within the European Union is required in order for a manufacturer to commercially distribute the product throughout the European Union. Additional local requirements may apply on a country-by-country basis. Outside of the European Union, regulatory approval would need to be sought on a country-by-country basis in order for us to market our Products.

Medical devices in Europe are classified into four primary categories. They are as follows:

Devices are further segmented into the classes noted below. In Vitro Diagnostic devices (IVDs) have their own classification scheme and while active implantable devices do not follow the same classification system as provided by the Medical Device Directive (MDD), they are subject to similar requirements as Class III devices:

We  have established a wholly-owned subsidiary in Russia and are seeking to establish a wholly-owned subsidiary in Europe (Poland) for product distribution and certification.

Other Regulatory Requirements

Even after a device receives clearance or approval and is placed in commercial distribution, numerous regulatory requirements apply. These include:

Also, the FDA may require us to conduct post-market surveillance studies or establish and maintain a system for tracking our Products through the chain of distribution to the patient level. The FDA enforces regulatory requirements by conducting periodic, unannounced inspections and market surveillance. Inspections may include the manufacturing facilities of our subcontractors.

Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in enforcement actions by the FDA and other regulatory agencies. These may include any of the following sanctions or consequences:

Our contract manufacturers, specification developers and some suppliers of components or device accessories, also are required to manufacture our Products in compliance with current good manufacturing practice requirements set forth in the QSR. The QSR requires a quality system for the design, manufacture, packaging, labeling, storage, installation and servicing of marketed devices, and it includes extensive requirements with respect to quality management and organization, device design, buildings, equipment, purchase and handling of components or services, production and process controls, packaging and labeling controls, device evaluation, distribution, installation, complaint handling, servicing, and record keeping. The FDA evaluates compliance with the QSR through periodic unannounced inspections that may include the manufacturing facilities of our subcontractors. If the FDA believes that any of our contract manufacturers or regulated suppliers are not in compliance with these requirements, it can shut down such manufacturing operations, require recall of our Products, refuse to approve new marketing applications, institute legal proceedings to detain or seize products, enjoin future violations or assess civil and criminal penalties against us or our officers or other employees.

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and Similar Foreign and State Laws and Regulations Affecting the Transmission, Security and Privacy of Health Information

We may also be subject to data privacy and security regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, and their respective implementing regulations, imposes specified requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information. Among other things, HITECH makes HIPAA’s security standards directly applicable to business associates, defined as service providers of covered entities that create, receive, maintain or transmit protected health information in connection with providing a service for or on behalf of a covered entity. HITECH also created four new tiers of civil monetary penalties and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In addition, many state laws govern the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from HIPAA and each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect.

Foreign data privacy regulations, such as the EU Data Protection Directive (Directive 95/46/EC), the country-specific regulations that implement Directive 95/46/EC, and the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) also govern the processing of personally identifiable data, and may be stricter than U.S. laws.

Fraud and Abuse Laws

In addition to FDA restrictions, there are numerous U.S. federal and state laws pertaining to healthcare fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback laws and physician self-referral laws. Our relationships with healthcare providers and other third parties are subject to scrutiny under these laws. Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including, in some instances, imprisonment and exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, including the Medicare, Medicaid and Veterans Administration health programs.

Federal Anti-Kickback and Self-Referral Laws

The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or providing remuneration (including any kickback, bribe or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, to induce either the referral of an individual, or the furnishing, recommending, or arranging of a good or service, for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs. The term “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including such items as gifts, discounts, the furnishing of supplies or equipment, credit arrangements, waiver of payments and providing anything at less than its fair market value. Although there are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly. Practices that involve remuneration that may be alleged to be intended to induce prescribing, purchases or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exception or safe harbor. Failure to meet all of the requirements of a particular applicable statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor does not make the conduct per se illegal under the Anti-Kickback Statute. Instead, the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on a review of all its relevant facts and circumstances. Several courts have interpreted the statute’s intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals of (or purchases, or recommendations related to) federal healthcare covered business, the Anti-Kickback Statute has been implicated and potentially violated.

The penalties for violating the federal Anti-Kickback Statute include imprisonment for up to five years, fines of up to $25,000 per violation and possible exclusion from federal healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. Many states have adopted prohibitions similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, some of which do not have the same exceptions and apply to the referral of patients for healthcare services reimbursed by any source, not only by the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Further, the Anti-Kickback Statute was amended by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or PPACA. Specifically, as noted above, under the Anti-Kickback Statute, the government must prove the defendant acted “knowingly” to prove a violation occurred. The PPACA added a provision to clarify that with respect to violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, “a person need not have actual knowledge” of the statute or specific intent to commit a violation of the statute. This change effectively overturns case law interpretations that set a higher standard under which prosecutors had to prove the specific intent to violate the law. In addition, the PPACA codified case law that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act.

We plan to provide the initial training to providers and patients necessary for appropriate use of our technology either through our own educators or by contracting with outside educators that have completed an appropriate training course. Outside educators are reimbursed for their services at fair market value.

Noncompliance with the federal anti-kickback legislation could result in our exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental programs, restrictions on our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions, and civil and criminal penalties.

Federal law also includes a provision commonly known as the “Stark Law,” which prohibits a physician from referring Medicare or Medicaid patients to an entity providing “designated health services,” including a company that furnishes durable medical equipment, in which the physician has an ownership or investment interest or with which the physician has entered into a compensation arrangement. Violation of the Stark Law could result in denial of payment, disgorgement of reimbursements received under a noncompliant arrangement, civil penalties, and exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental programs. We believe that we have structured our provider arrangements to comply with current Stark Law requirements.

Nevertheless, a determination of liability under such laws could result in fines and penalties and restrictions on our ability to operate in these jurisdictions.

Additionally, as some of these laws are still evolving, we lack definitive guidance as to the application of certain key aspects of these laws as they relate to our arrangements with providers with respect to patient training. We cannot predict the final form that these regulations will take or the effect that the final regulations will have on us. As a result, our provider and training arrangements may ultimately be found to be not in compliance with applicable federal law.

Federal False Claims Act

The Federal False Claims Act provides, in part, that the federal government may bring a lawsuit against any person whom it believes has knowingly presented, or caused to be presented, a false or fraudulent request for payment from the federal government, or who has made a false statement or used a false record to get a claim approved. In addition, amendments in 1986 to the Federal False Claims Act have made it easier for private parties to bring “qui tam” whistleblower lawsuits against companies under the Federal False Claims Act. Penalties include fines ranging from $5,500 to $11,000 for each false claim, plus three times the amount of damages that the federal government sustained because of the act of that person. Qui tam actions have increased significantly in recent years, causing greater numbers of healthcare companies to have to defend a false claim action, pay fines or be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state healthcare programs as a result of an investigation arising out of such action.

There are other federal anti-fraud laws that that prohibit, among other actions, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a healthcare benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a healthcare offense, and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services.

Additionally, HIPAA established two federal crimes in the healthcare fraud and false statements relating to healthcare matters. The healthcare fraud statute prohibits knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private payors. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment or exclusion from government sponsored programs. The false statements statute prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines or imprisonment.

Civil Monetary Penalties Law

In addition to the Anti-Kickback Statute and the civil and criminal False Claims Acts, the federal government has the authority to seek civil monetary penalties, or CMPs, assessments, and exclusion against an individual or entity based on a wide variety of prohibited conduct. For example, the Civil Monetary Penalties Law authorizes the imposition of substantial CMPs against an entity that engages in activities including, but not limited to: (1) knowingly presenting or causing to be presented, a claim for services not provided as claimed or which is otherwise false or fraudulent in any way; (2) knowingly giving or causing to be given false or misleading information reasonably expected to influence the decision to discharge a patient; (3) offering or giving remuneration to any beneficiary of a federal health care program likely to influence the receipt of reimbursable items or services; (4) arranging for reimbursable services with an entity which is excluded from participation from a federal health care program; (5) knowingly or willfully soliciting or receiving remuneration for a referral of a federal health care program beneficiary; or (6) using a payment intended for a federal health care program beneficiary for another use. Noncompliance can result in civil money penalties of up to $10,000 for each wrongful act, assessment of three times the amount claimed for each item or service and exclusion from the federal healthcare programs.

State Fraud and Abuse Provisions

Many states have also adopted some form of anti-kickback and anti-referral laws and a false claims act. We believe that we are in conformance to such laws. Nevertheless, a determination of liability under such laws could result in fines and penalties and restrictions on our ability to operate in these jurisdictions.

Physician Payment Sunshine Act

Transparency laws regarding payments or other items of value provided to healthcare providers and teaching hospitals may also impact our business practices. The federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act requires most medical device manufacturers to report annually to the Secretary of Human Health Services financial arrangements, payments, or other transfers of value made by that entity to physicians and teaching hospitals. The payment information is made publicly available in a searchable format on a CMS website. Over the next several years, we will need to dedicate significant resources to establish and maintain systems and processes in order to comply with these regulations. Failure to comply with the reporting requirements can result in significant civil monetary penalties. Similar laws have been enacted or are under consideration in foreign jurisdictions.

U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, prohibits U.S. corporations and their representatives from offering, promising, authorizing or making corrupt payments, gifts or transfers to any foreign government official, government staff member, political party or political candidate in an attempt to obtain or retain business abroad. The FCPA also obligates companies whose securities are listed in the United States to comply with accounting provisions requiring the company to maintain books and records that accurately and fairly reflect all transactions of the corporation, including international subsidiaries, and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls for international operations. Activities that violate the FCPA, even if they occur wholly outside the United States, can result in criminal and civil fines, imprisonment, disgorgement, oversight, and debarment from government contracts.

Employees

As of October 31, 2020, we had seven employees, none of whom are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relationship with our employees to be satisfactory.

Legal Proceedings

As of the date of this circular, we are not party to, and our property is the subject of, any material legal proceedings.

OUR PROPERTY

Our principal executive office is located in leased premises of approximately 3,481 square feet at a rental cost of $3,984 per month at 125 Wilbur Place, Suite 170, Bohemia, New York, 11716. We believe that these facilities are adequate for our needs, including providing the space and infrastructure to accommodate our development work based on our current operating plan. We do not own any real estate.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of the Company together with our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this circular. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this circular, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review the “Risk Factors” section of this circular for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

Forward Looking Statements

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included in this circular. Certain information contained in this MD&A includes “forward-looking statements.” Statements which are not historical reflect our current expectations and projections about our future results, performance, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, prospects and opportunities and are based upon information currently available to us and our management and their interpretation of what is believed to be significant factors affecting our existing and proposed business, including many assumptions regarding future events. Actual results, performance, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, prospects and opportunities could differ materially and perhaps substantially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements as a result of various risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those risks described in detail in the section entitled “Risk Factors” of this circular.

Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “should,” “would,” “will,” “could,” “scheduled,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “seek,” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology.

In light of these risks and uncertainties, and especially given the nature of our existing and proposed business, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this section and elsewhere in this circular will in fact occur. Potential investors should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as expressly required by the federal securities laws, there is no undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason.

Overview

We are a neurodiagnostic and predictive technology platform company seeking to provide a centralized platform for data acquisition and analysis of EEG data that combines cutting-edge medical device technologies with cloud-based telehealth services. Both our NeuroCap, a pre-gelled disposable EEG headset, and NeuroEEG, a full-montage standard encephalograph, received FDA clearance to market in 2018.

On September 21, 2018, we entered into a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) with MemoryMD, Inc. and AFGG Acquisition Corp. to acquire MemoryMD, Inc. (the “Acquisition”). The transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement were consummated on September 21, 2018 and, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, all outstanding shares of MemoryMD were exchanged for shares of our common stock. Accordingly, we acquired 100% of Memory MD, Inc. in exchange for the issuance of shares of our common stock and MemoryMD, Inc. became our wholly-owned subsidiary. We issued an additional 4,083,252 shares of our common stock upon the automatic conversion at the closing of an aggregate of $1,507,000 principal amount plus accrued interest of outstanding convertible promissory notes issued by MemoryMD Inc., and we further issued an additional 1,604,378 shares of our common stock upon the automatic conversion immediately subsequent to the closing of an aggregate of $640,000 principal amount plus accrued interest of outstanding convertible promissory notes issued by MemoryMD Inc.

As of immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition, we entered into an Assignment and Assumption Agreement with Chromium 24 LLC, pursuant to which Chromium 24 LLC assumed all of our remaining assets and liabilities through the closing of the Acquisition. Accordingly, as of the closing of the Acquisition, we had no assets or liabilities.

Following the Acquisition, the Company is now a neurodiagnostic and predictive technology platform company seeking to ultimately provide a centralized platform for data acquisition and analysis of EEG data that combines our medical device technologies with cloud-based telehealth services. The Company is not currently offering any data analysis services. The Company is primarily focused on establishing diagnostic protocols to identify pathological risk factors involving the brain, and driving novel insights into cognitive health that support early treatment of neurological disorders.

In 2019, we commenced acting as a distributor of third-party medical devices in Russia (including those purchased from a company affiliated with one of our officers and directors), which resulted in all of our revenue for 2019. Sales in Russia is also the majority of all revenue in 2020 (except for $7,498 that was from sales from the U.S. operating subsidiary). While we intend to continue the sale of third party medical devices, we do not intend for it to be our primary source of revenue in the long-term and expect to curtail or cease this line of operations as, if and when we commence generating material, recurring revenues from our products, of which we can give no assurance. We also can give no assurance that any revenue we generate from so acting as a distributor of third-party medical devices will continue, will continue to be material or will be sufficient to enable us to continue our operations. We have no supply or distribution agreements in place with respect to such business. In the event that we see an opportunity to sell such products, we procure them and then re-sell them.

Our sole business since the Acquisition is the business of MemoryMD. Our management’s discussion and analysis below is based on the financial results of MemoryMD.

We have very limited resources. To date, our primary activities have been limited to, and our limited resources have been dedicated to, performing business and financial planning, raising capital, recruiting personnel, negotiating with business partners and the licensors of our intellectual property and conducting development activities, although we have acted as a distributor of third-party medical devices in Russia (including those purchased from a company affiliated with one of our officers and directors) which has generated revenue for us. Our first products, the NeuroCap and NeuroEEG, are ready for commercialization and sale and we have commenced some non-recurring, initial sales. Our other products are still being tested or are still under development.

We have incurred losses since inception of MemoryMD in 2015 and had an accumulated deficit of $6,439,602 as of June 30, 2020, primarily as a result of expenses incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from general and administrative expenses associated with our operations. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating and net losses for the foreseeable future.

Historically, our primary source of cash has been proceeds from the sale of convertible promissory notes and other borrowings. To fund our operations, for the six months ended June 30, 2020, we issued one promissory note for gross proceeds of $20,000. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we issued convertible promissory notes for aggregate gross proceeds of $655,000. In addition, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, we borrowed an aggregate of $273,084 from related parties. Additionally, in April 2020, existing stockholders of the Company agreed to advance to the Company an aggregate amount of $250,000 pursuant to the terms of Convertible Grid Promissory Notes (the “Grid Notes”). As of June 30, 2020, a total aggregate amount of $200,000 has been advanced pursuant to the terms of the Grid Notes.

We need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations through public or private equity or debt financings or other sources, which may include collaborations with third parties. However, we may be unable to raise additional funds when needed on favorable terms or at all. Our failure to raise such capital as and when needed would have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to develop and commercialize our products and future products and our ability to pursue our business strategy. See “–Liquidity and Capital Requirements” below.

Financial Overview

Revenue

For the six months ended June 30, 2020, we have generated approximately $220,000 of revenue through our acting as a distributor of third-party medical devices in Russia (including those purchased from a company affiliated with one of our officers and directors), while we continue to commercialize our products. While we intend to continue generating revenues through the sale of third-party medical devices, we do not intend for it to be our primary source of revenue in the long-term. We do not expect to generate recurring, material revenue from our products unless or until we successfully commercialize our products. If we fail to successfully commercialize our developed products or fail to complete the development of any other product candidate we may pursue in the future, in a timely manner, or fail to obtain regulatory approval, we may not be able to solely rely on generating substantial and material revenue from the distribution of third-party medical devices.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs for personnel in functions not directly associated with research and development activities. Other significant costs include legal fees relating to corporate matters, intellectual property costs, professional fees for consultants assisting with regulatory, clinical, product development and financial matters, and product costs. We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will significantly increase in the future to support our continued research and development activities, commercialization of our products, if approved, and the increased costs of operating as a public company. These increases will include increased costs related to the hiring of additional personnel and fees for legal and professional services, as well as other public company related costs.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses consist of expenses incurred in performing research and development activities in developing our products. Research and development expenses include compensation and benefits for research and development employees, overhead expenses, cost of laboratory supplies, clinical trial and related clinical manufacturing expenses, costs related to regulatory operations, fees paid to consultants, and other outside expenses. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and costs incurred by third parties are expensed as the contracted work is performed.

We expect our research and development expenses to remain substantially the same for the next six to nine months as we continue to develop and commercialize our products.  As we develop our cloud-based computing system, we expect our research and development expenses to significantly increase.

Interest Expense

Interest expense primarily consists of amortized note issuance costs and interest costs related to the convertible notes we issued in 2019. The convertible notes bear interest at fixed rate ranging from 8%-10% per annum.

Results of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 

The following table sets forth the results of operations of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 vs. June 30, 2019

Revenues

Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2020 was $86,659, compared to $75,376 for the three months ended June 30, 2019. In the three months ended June 30 2020 and 2019, we generated our revenue through acting as a distributor of third-party medical devices in Russia (including those purchased from a company affiliated with one of our officers and directors).

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses were $178,512 for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to $120,286 for the three months ended June 30, 2019. The increase in general and administrative expenses were primarily due to an increase in consulting fees related to the Company listing on the OTC and medical consultants related to the preparation of submission of the revised Neurocaps to the FDA. In addition, wages increased in the current quarter due to the accrual of salaries pursuant to employment agreements in the current year.

Research and development expenses

Research and development expenses were $46,955 for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to $27,776 for the three months ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to an increase in development activities surrounding the development of a new, modified version of the NeuroCap.

Professional fees

Professional fees were $93,465 for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to $40,102 for the three months ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to an increase in legal fees and accounting fees in the current year.

Interest expense

Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2020 was $1,182,619, consisting of interest expense of $23,942 and amortization of debt issuance costs of approximately $1,158,677 related to the Company’s convertible promissory notes totaling $855,000.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019

Revenues

Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was $220,504 compared to $77,626 for the six months ended June 30, 2019. In the six months ended June 30, 2020, we generated our revenue through acting as a distributor of third-party medical devices in Russia (including those purchased from a company affiliated with one of our offices and directors). In the six months ended June 30, 2019, our revenue was related to data analysis of the EEG software.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses were $387,147 for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to $321,527 for the six months ended June 30, 2019. The increase in general and administrative expenses were primarily due to an increase in consulting fees related to the Company listing on the OTC and medical consultants related to the preparation of submission of the revised Neurocaps to the FDA. In addition, wages increased in the current quarter due to the accrual of salaries pursuant to employment agreements in the current year.

Research and development expenses

Research and development expenses were $143,345 for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to $50,066 for the six months ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to an increase in development activities surrounding the development of a new, modified version of the NeuroCap.

Professional fees

Professional fees were $217,073 for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to $151,175 for the six months ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to an increase in accounting and legal fees in the current year.

Interest expense

Interest expense, for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was $1,636,235, of which, approximately $1,590,400 is related to the amortization of debt discount and non-cash interest expense related to the Company’s convertible promissory notes. An additional $45,835 is related to interest expense related to the Company’s convertible notes and promissory notes. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $19,024, consisting of interest expense of $9,964 and amortization of debt issuance costs of $7,704 related to the Company’s convertible promissory notes totaling $230,000, as well as interest expense related to a lease of $1,356.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

While we have generated revenue in 2019 and 2020, we anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, substantially all of such revenue was generated through acting as a distributor of third-party medical devices in Russia, and we did not have any material sales of our products. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially as we develop our products and pursue pre-clinical testing and clinical trials, seek any further regulatory approvals, contract to manufacture any products, establish our own sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure to commercialize our products, hire additional staff, add operational, financial and management systems and operate as a public company.

Historically, our primary source of cash has been proceeds from the sale of convertible promissory notes and related party loans. On December 31, 2019, we issued and sold to a third party a convertible note in the original principal amount of $275,000, and a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock, pursuant to which we received $250,000 after an original issue discount of $25,000. We have also from time to time issued shares of our common stock to individuals and entities as payment for services rendered to us in lieu of cash.

All of our then-outstanding convertible promissory notes, in the aggregate principal amount plus interest through September 21, 2018 of $2,275,050, converted into aggregate of 5,687,630 shares of our common stock upon or immediately after the closing of the Acquisition.

In connection with the private placement of the convertible promissory notes, we paid the placement agent a cash fee of $117,880, in addition to equity compensation in the form of common stock purchase warrants.

We have no current source of revenue to sustain our present activities other than as acting as a distributor of medical devices in Russia (including those purchased from a company affiliated with one of our offices and directors), which is not our primary business goal, and we do not expect to generate material revenue, from our products until, and unless, the FDA or other regulatory authorities approve our products under development and we successfully commercialize our products. Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our cash needs through our distributorship revenue, a combination of equity (preferred stock or common stock) and debt financings as well as collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. We do not have any committed external source of funds. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of our stockholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third-party partners, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our Product development, future commercialization efforts, or grant rights to develop and market our cortical strip, grid electrode and depth electrode technology that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

Our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in its report on our financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, noting the existence of substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. This uncertainty arose from management’s review of our results of operations and financial condition and its conclusion that, based on our operating plans, we did not have sufficient existing working capital to sustain operations for a period of twelve months from the date of the issuance of these financial statements.

We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents, without raising additional funds or generating revenues, will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses only to approximately October 2020.

In January 2019, we commenced a convertible note offering for up to $500,000, of which we have raised $380,000 through July 23, 2019. In December 2019, we also raised an aggregate gross amount of $275,000, less a $25,000 original issue discount, from an investor pursuant to a securities purchase agreement. In April 2020, existing stockholders of the Company agreed to advance to the Company an aggregate amount of $250,000 pursuant to the terms of Convertible Grid Promissory Notes. As of July 9, 2020, a total aggregate amount of $250,000 has been advanced pursuant to the terms of the grid notes. We may obtain additional financing in the future through the issuance of our common stock, through other equity or debt financings or through collaborations or partnerships with other companies. We may not be able to raise additional capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and any failure to raise capital as and when needed could compromise our ability to execute on our business plan.

The development of our products is subject to numerous uncertainties, and we have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be substantially different than we currently anticipate and could use our cash resources sooner than we expect. Additionally, the process of developing medical devices is costly, and the timing of progress in pre-clinical tests and clinical trials is uncertain. Our ability to successfully transition to profitability will be dependent upon achieving a level of product sales adequate to support our cost structure. We cannot assure you that we will ever be profitable or generate positive cash flow from operating activities.

Net cash used in operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $414,135 for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $581,044 for the six months ended June 30, 2019. This fluctuation is primarily due to an increase in net loss of approximately $2,151,000 offset by an increase in accounts payable and changes in accrued expenses third party and related party of approximately $340,000 and an increase in the amortization of debt discount and non-cash interest expense of approximately $1,583,000, and an increase in loss from the change in fair value of derivative liabilities of approximately $334,000. Additionally there was an approximately $33,000 increase in common stock issued for services.

Net cash used in investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to $1,005 for the six months ended June 30, 2019. The decrease is due to no new purchases of fixed assets in the six months ended June 30, 2020 as compared to June 30, 2019.

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $220,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2020, which primarily consisted of the sale of the Company’s convertible promissory notes for aggregate gross proceeds of $200,000 as well as proceeds from the issuance of a third-party promissory note of $20,000.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $445,153 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, which primarily consisted of the sale of the Company’s convertible promissory notes for aggregate gross proceeds of $230,000 as well as proceeds from a related party loan of $215,000.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

The following table sets forth the results of operations of the Company for the years Ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Revenues

Revenue for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 was $489,202 compared to $58,113 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, we generated all of our revenue through acting as a distributor of third-party medical devices in Russia (including those purchased from a company affiliated with one of our offices and directors), and we did not have any sales of our Products. In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, our revenue was resulting from finalizing development of our NeuroCap product and commencement of sales in 2018.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses were $532,312 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $675,882 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, general and administrative expenses were primarily related to approximately $274,000 in payroll related expenses, approximately $48,000 in travel costs, approximately $45,000 in consulting fees and approximately $66,000 in insurance expense. In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, general and administrative costs were primarily related to approximately $430,000 in consulting and compensation expense, approximately $54,000 in travel costs and approximately $40,000 in software development costs and approximately $30,000 in insurance expense. The decrease in spending in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily attributable to a decrease in consulting costs.

Research and development expenses

Research and development expenses were $103,616 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $210,206 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in development activities and a focus on growth of the operations of the Company.

Interest expense

Interest expense, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 was $32,922, the majority of which related to the Company’s convertible promissory notes. Interest expense, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 was $159,165, consisting of interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs of approximately $156,000 related to the Company’s convertible promissory notes and interest expense related to the Ichor lease of approximately $3,600. The decrease was due to few convertible notes in the year ended December 31, 2019 and no debt issuance costs related to the convertible notes that were issued during fiscal year 2019.

 Other income

Other income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 was $2,108 compared to $18,186 in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. The company recorded $2,108 in other income related to the write of off a payable in the year ended December 31, 2019. In the year ended December 31, 2018, other income was related to a gain on sale of accessories provided for research and development testing of approximately $7,500 and income related to the sublease of warehouse space to a related party of approximately $10,600.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash used in operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $854,726 for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $1,112,690 for the year ended December 31, 2018. This fluctuation is primarily due to an decrease in net loss of $422,237 in fiscal 2019 along with an increase in accounts payable and accounts payable related party of approximately $137,000 in the year ended December 31, 2019.

Net cash used in investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $1,005 for the year ended December 31, 2019, which consisted of the purchase of property and equipment.

Net cash used in investing activities was $1,143 for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $953,238 for the year ended December 31, 2019, which primarily consisted of the sale of the Company’s convertible promissory notes for aggregate gross proceeds of $630,000 and proceeds from related party loans in the amount of $273,084.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $979,868 for the year ended December 31, 2018, which primarily consisted of the sale of the Company’s convertible promissory notes for aggregate gross proceeds of $964,120.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the members of our board of directors and our executive officers and the positions held by each.

Boris (Baruch) Goldstein, Chairman of the Board, Secretary and Executive Vice President. Dr. Goldstein is the founder and has been Chairman of the Board of MemoryMD since its inception, and has been the executive Chairman of the Board of the Company since the Closing of the Acquisition and Executive Vice President since January 2019. Dr. Goldstein is a serial entrepreneur, having founded or co-founded over a dozen private companies over the past 10 years alone. Since February 2014, he is the founder and Chairman of Potbotics Inc., a private data aggregation and technology company focused on the global medical cannabis market. Since April 2015, he is the founder, Dr. Goldstein is also since July 2016 the founder and the Chairman of the Board of Nano Graphene Inc., a private, commercial scale graphene and graphene based materials producer and supply company. Dr. Goldstein is the founder in November 2016 and the president of High Technology Capital Fund and High Technology Capital Management LLC, and is a partner in High Accelerator, which helps build and support next generation technologies.

Dr. Goldstein received his B.A., MBA and Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics from Latvian Technical University.

The Company believes that Dr. Goldstein is qualified to serve as Chairman of the Board due to his extensive experience as a founder and operator of numerous start-up and other companies, and due his role as a founder of MemoryMD.

Nickolay V. Kukekov, Director. Dr. Kukekov has been a member of MemoryMD’s Board of Directors since September 2017, and a member of the Board of the Company since the Closing of the Acquisition. Dr. Kukekov currently serves as the managing director of HRA Capital (formerly Highline Research Advisors), a division of Corinthian Partners L.L.C. Prior to forming Highline Research Advisors in 2012, Dr. Kukekov was the Managing Director of Healthcare Investment Banking at Summer Street Research from October 2010 to August 2012. In September 2009, Dr. Kukekov was a co-founder of the Healthcare Investment Banking group at Gilford Securities. From December 2007 to July 2009, Dr. Kukekov served as the managing director of Paramount BioCapital, where he ran the advisory, M&A and capital raising services for in-house private and public portfolio companies. Dr. Kukekov holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology from the University of Colorado at Boulder and a Ph.D. in Neuroscience from Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York.

The Company believes that Dr. Kukekov is qualified to serve as a member of the Board of Directors due to his extensive experience in healthcare and medical device investment banking.

Mark Corrao, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Corrao has been the part-time chief financial officer of MemoryMD since August 2018 and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since November 2018. He is a Managing Director for the CFO Squad, an accounting firm that specializes in pre-audit accounting for public and private companies, which provides those services to the Company. Additionally, Mr. Corrao is currently the Chief Financial Officer for Generex Biotechnology Corporation and Kannalife Sciences, Inc. Mr. Corrao was formerly a founder and Chief Financial Officer of Strikeforce Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded software development and services company specializing in the development of a suite of integrated computer network security products. In addition to the ten years of his service at Strikeforce, Mr. Corrao has spent numerous years in the public accounting arena specializing in certified auditing, SEC accounting, corporate taxation and financial planning. Mr. Corrao’s background also includes numerous years on Wall Street with Merrill Lynch, Spear Leeds & Kellogg and Greenfield Arbitrage Partners. While on Wall Street Mr. Corrao was involved in several IPO’s and has been a guiding influence in several start-up companies. Prior to joining StrikeForce, he was a Director at Applied Digital Solutions from December 2000 through December 2001. Mr. Corrao was a Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Advanced Communications Sciences from March 1997 through December 2000. Mr. Corrao has a B.S. in Accounting from CUNY.

Family Relationship

There are no family relationships between any of our officers and directors. 

Structure and Operation of the Board

We do not have standing audit, compensation or nominating committees of our Board. However, the full Board performs all of the functions of a standing audit committee, compensation committee and nominating committee. The Board currently consists of two directors: Dr. Goldstein (Chairman) and Mr. Kukekov. The following is a brief description of these functions of the Board:

Nomination of Directors

The Board does not currently have a standing nominating committee, and thus we do not have a nominating committee charter. Due to our small size and limited operations to date, the Board determined that it was appropriate for the entire Board to act as the nominating committee. The full Board currently has the responsibility of selecting individuals to be nominated for election to the Board. Board candidates are typically identified by existing directors or members of management. The Board will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Any such candidates will be evaluated on the same basis as other candidates being evaluated by the Board. Information with respect to such candidates should be sent to Brain Scientific Inc., c/o CEO, 205 East 42^nd Street, 14^th Floor, New York, New York 10017. The Board considers the needs for the Board as a whole when identifying and evaluating nominees and, among other things, considers diversity in background, age, experience, qualifications, attributes and skills in identifying nominees, although it does not have a formal policy regarding the consideration of diversity.

Audit Committee Related Function

We do not have a standing audit committee, and thus we do not have an audit committee charter. Due to our small size and limited operations to date, the Board determined that it was appropriate for the entire Board to act as the audit committee. The Board intends to review with management and the Company’s independent public accountants the Company’s financial statements, the accounting principles applied in their preparation, the scope of the audit, any comments made by the independent accountants upon the financial condition of the Company and its accounting controls and procedures and such other matters as the Board deems appropriate. Because the Company’s common stock is quoted on the OTCQB market tier, the Company is not subject to the listing requirements of any securities exchange regarding audit committee related matters.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

We do not have an audit committee financial expert, because we do not have an audit committee.

Risk Oversight

The Board’s risk oversight is administered primarily through the following:

Due to the small size and early stage of the Company, we have not adopted a formal policy on whether the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions should be separate or combined.

Compensation Committee Related Function

The Board does not currently have a standing compensation committee, and thus we do not have a compensation committee charter. Due to our small size and limited operations to date, the Board determined that it was appropriate for the entire Board to act as the compensation committee. The full Board currently has the responsibility for reviewing and establishing compensation for executive officers and making policy decisions concerning salaries and incentive compensation for executive officers of the Company.

The Company’s executive compensation program is administered by the Board, which determines the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of the Company. In reviewing the compensation of the individual executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer), the Board considers the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer, published compensation surveys and current market conditions.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To our knowledge, our directors and executive officers have not been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years:

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Executive Officer Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information regarding each element of compensation that was paid or awarded to the named executive officers of the Company for the periods indicated.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table presents the outstanding equity awards held by each of the named executive officers as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Long-Term Incentive Plans and Awards

In August, 2018, our board of directors adopted and stockholders approved the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan. There were 1,000,000 outstanding equity awards granted under the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Director Compensation

There were no amounts paid or stock awards made to our non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Messrs. Goldstein, Crowne and Sakharov received compensation for their services to the Company as set forth under the summary execution compensation table above. In 2019, our directors were entitled to reimbursement for expenses incurred by them in connection with attending board meetings. Our directors also were eligible for stock option grants and other equity grants.

Employment Agreements

Jesse W. Crowne

The Company and Mr. Crowne entered into an employment agreement, effective as of January 25, 2019. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Crowne was to receive an initial annual base salary of $160,000, which would be increased to $175,000 per annum in the event the Company is successful in raising at least $1,000,000 (the “Capital Raise”) from the date of the employment agreement. In addition, Mr. Crowne could receive an annual cash bonus of up to $40,000 based on Mr. Crowne’s performance as determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and would receive a $30,000 sign-on bonus payable in two tranches. Mr. Crowne was also entitled to participate in the Company’s long-term incentive compensation plans generally made available to senior executives of the Company, pursuant to which the Company issued to Mr. Crowne options to purchase 800,000 (or 1,000,000 in the event of a Capital Raise) shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share, of which 200,000 (or 250,000 in the event of a Capital Raise) shares shall vest on the one year anniversary of the date of grant, and 600,000 (or 750,000 in the event of a Capital Raise) shall vest ratably on a quarterly basis over the following two years.

In the event Mr. Crowne’s employment were terminated as a result of death during or disability, Mr. Crowne or his beneficiaries or legal representatives would be provided any earned base salary and all benefits payable under any employee benefit plan applicable at the time or termination (the “Unconditional Entitlements”).

In the event of the Mr. Crowne’s termination for cause or termination by Mr. Crowne other than for a good reason, Mr. Crowne would be provided the Unconditional Entitlements.

In the event of a termination by Mr. Crowne for good reason or by the Company without cause, Mr. Crowne would be provided the Unconditional Entitlements and the Company would provide Mr. Crowne his base salary then in effect for a period of 12 months after the date of termination (provided that the Company is successful in raising at least $2,000,000 from the date of the employment agreement), 100% of the cost of premiums for COBRA for a period of 12 months from the date of termination, acceleration of the vesting his stock options, and continued vesting of any restricted stock or other equity awards subject to vesting.

The employment agreement contained customary non-competition and non-solicitation provisions in favor of the Company. Mr. Crowne also agreed to customary terms regarding confidentiality and ownership of intellectual property.

As noted above, Mr. Crowne resigned as Chief Executive Officer on May 31, 2019. He resigned as a director of the Company on November 14, 2019. His options were forfeited.

Boris Goldstein

On March 25, 2020, the Company and Mr. Goldstein entered into an employment agreement, effective as of January 30, 2020 (the “Goldstein Employment Agreement”). Under the Goldstein Employment Agreement, Mr. Goldstein will receive an initial annual base salary of $180,000, which shall be reviewed annually and may be increased, but not decreased, by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, or if there be no such Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors (in either case, the “Committee”). In addition, Mr. Goldstein shall be eligible to receive an annual cash bonus equal to a target of 50% of his annual base salary, based on the Company’s achievement of certain performance metrics and goals as may be determined by the Committee in consultation with Mr. Goldstein prior to or promptly following the beginning of each fiscal year. Mr. Goldstein shall also be entitled to participate in any stock option, performance share, performance unit or other equity based long-term incentive compensation plan, program or arrangement generally made available to senior executive officers of the Company, pursuant to which the Company issued to Mr. Goldstein options to purchase 800,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share, which shall vest ratably on a quarterly basis over the following two years.

In the event Mr. Goldstein’s employment is terminated as a result of death or disability, Mr. Goldstein or his estate shall be provided any earned base salary, any earned but unpaid annual bonus for the year prior to termination (the “Prior Year Bonus”), a pro-rated annual bonus for the year of termination (the “Pro-Rated Bonus), if any, reimbursement of any unpaid business expenses and accrued vacation, and, in the event of termination for disability, all benefits payable under any employee benefit plan applicable at the time of termination.

In the event Mr. Goldstein’s employment is terminated for cause or by Mr. Goldstein without good reason, Mr. Goldstein shall forfeit the right to receive any and all further payments under the Goldstein Employment Agreement, other than the right to receive any unpaid earned annual base salary, the Prior Year Bonus, reimbursement of business expenses and accrued vacation, if any, and benefits payable under any employee benefit plan applicable at the time of termination, in each case as accrued through the date of termination.

In the event Mr. Goldstein’s employment is terminated by Mr. Goldstein for good reason or by the Company without cause, Mr. Goldstein shall be paid (i) his accrued but unpaid annual base salary as of the termination date, (ii) his annual base salary then in effect for a period of 24 months after the date of termination (or 60 months if the termination without cause or for good reason occurs within 24 months of a change of control (as defined in the Goldstein Employment Agreement)), (iii) the target annual bonus for the year of termination, if any, (iv) any unpaid Prior Year Bonus, (v) reimbursement of unpaid business expenses and the dollar value of any unused and accrued vacation days, and (vi) 100% of the cost of premiums for COBRA for a period of 12 months from the date of termination. In addition, 100% of any unvested portion of Mr. Goldstein’s outstanding option grants shall immediately vest and become exercisable and remain exercisable for the periods specified in such option.

The Goldstein Employment Agreement contains customary non-competition and non-solicitation provisions in favor of the Company. Mr. Goldstein also agreed to customary terms regarding confidentiality and ownership of intellectual property. 

Vadim Sakharov

On March 25, 2020, the Company and Mr. Sakharov entered into an employment agreement, effective as of January 30, 2020 (the “Sakharov Employment Agreement”). Under the Sakharov Employment Agreement, Mr. Sakharov will receive an initial annual base salary of $60,000, which shall be reviewed annually and may be increased, but not decreased, by the Committee. In addition, Mr. Sakharov shall be eligible to receive an annual cash bonus equal to a target of 50% of his annual base salary, based on the Company’s achievement of certain performance metrics and goals as may be determined by the Committee in consultation with Mr. Sakharov prior to or promptly following the beginning of each fiscal year. Mr. Sakharov shall also be entitled to participate in any stock option, performance share, performance unit or other equity based long-term incentive compensation plan, program or arrangement generally made available to senior executive officers of the Company, pursuant to which the Company issued to Mr. Sakharov options to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share, which shall vest ratably on a quarterly basis over the following two years. On September 22, 2020, Mr. Sakharov resigned as President, Chief Technology Officer and Director.

Limits on Liability and Indemnification

We provide directors and officers insurance for our current directors and officers.

Our certificate of incorporation eliminates the personal liability of our directors to the fullest extent permitted by law. The certificate of incorporation further provides that the Company will indemnify its officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law. We believe that this indemnification covers at least negligence on the part of the indemnified parties. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers, and controlling persons under the foregoing provisions or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is therefore unenforceable.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN SECURITYHOLDERS

The following table shows the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of October 7, 2020 held by (i) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of our common stock; (ii) each director; (iii) each executive officer; and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and generally includes voting power and/or investment power with respect to the securities held. Shares of common stock subject to options and warrants currently exercisable or which may become exercisable within 60 days of October 7, 2020 are deemed outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding such options or warrants for purposes of computing the number of shares and percentage beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage beneficially owned by any other person. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons or entities named have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

The following table provides for percentage ownership assuming 19,478,258 shares are issued and outstanding as of October 7, 2020. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial holder of our common stock is our corporate address.

INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

During the year ended December 31, 2017, an entity controlled by Vadim Sakharov, the Company’s then CEO and current President and CTO, provided a non-interest-bearing, no-term loan to the Company. The Company repaid that loan in full during the year ended December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018, an entity controlled by Mr. Sakharov provided a $50,000 non-interest-bearing, no-term loan to the Company. An additional $5,530 of non-interest bearing no-term proceeds were loaned to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2019. As of June 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, the balance was $55,530 and $55,530, respectively.

On May 9, 2017, MemoryMD entered into a sublease agreement with Nano Graphene Inc., a company controlled by Dr. Goldstein and his affiliates. In the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 Nano Graphene paid rent, of $0 and $10,626, respectively, for warehouse space in the facility.

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had expenses related to research and development costs of $50,713 and $59,788, respectively, to an entity controlled by Mr. Sakharov. During the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had expenses related to research and development costs of $12,800 and $27,390, respectively, to an entity controlled by Mr. Sakharov. On September 22, 2020, Mr. Sakharov resigned as President, Chief Technology Officer and Director.

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had expenses related to marketing and sales costs of $0 and $15,000, respectively, to entities controlled by the Company’s Chairman.

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had expenses related to consulting fees of $0 and $83,377, respectively, to Mr. Sakharov.

Nickolay Kukekov, a director of the Company, was a Partner of HRA Capital. HRA Capital, through Corinthian Partners, LLC, acted as placement agent for MemoryMD’s convertible note offerings pursuant to which Corinthian received aggregate fees of $117,880 and warrants to purchase an estimated 291,740 shares of Company common stock.

In May 2018, we entered into a Patent Assignment and License Back Agreement with Boris Goldstein, our Chairman, Secretary and Executive Vice President, Dmitriy Prilutskiy, Stanislav Zabodaev and Medical Computer Systems Ltd. Pursuant to the agreement, among other things, Messrs. Goldstein, Prilutskiy and Zabodaev assigned all of their rights to a patent entitled “Apparatus And Method For Conducting Electroencephalography” (Application No.: 15/898,611), to our Company, and in return, we granted to Medical Computer Systems Ltd., an unaffiliated entity who also provides manufacturing services to us, a limited, royalty-free, fully paid-up, worldwide, nonexclusive license (without the right to sublicense or assign), to the patent, to practice, make and use the inventions, ideas and information embodied therein, and to make, use, offer to sell, sell, lease or import products, services, processes, methods and materials embodying or deriving from the inventions, ideas and information from the patent and any activities derived directly therefrom; provided, however, that if and upon FDA approval of a Product, Medical Computer Systems’ aforementioned rights shall be limited to manufacturing and sales solely to our Company or on our behalf provided that we purchase from Medical Computer Systems (and Medical Computer Systems makes available for sale) a minimum of 20,000 units of Products per calendar year on reasonable terms and conditions to be determined by the parties in good faith; provided further, however, that Medical Computer Systems can without any limitation sell products embodying or deriving from the inventions, ideas and information from the patent in (i) the territories that made up the former USSR (excluding the Baltic countries) and (ii) Japan. In furtherance of the foregoing first provision, in the event we fail to purchase the annual minimum order for a particular calendar year, Medical Computer Systems’ limitation to manufacture and sell Products only to our Company pursuant to this proviso shall be suspended for the next calendar year.

On September 1, 2018, the Company entered into a sublease agreement with a company controlled by the Company’s Chairman, whereby the Company makes payments to the related party for shared office space. This lease was terminated on March 31, 2019. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company made approximately $4,900 and $6,202, respectively, in rent payments to the related party. For the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company has made approximately $0 and $4,900, respectively, in rent payments to the related party.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, an affiliate of Boris Goldstein, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, provided an aggregate total of $50,000, in a non-interest-bearing, no-term loan to the Company. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the balance was $50,000 and $50,000, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, an affiliate of Nickolay Kukekov, a director of the Company, provided an aggregate total of $217,000 in non-interest-bearing, no-term loans to the Company. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the balance was $217,000 and $217,000, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we purchased an aggregate of $386,421 of medical devices for resale and distribution from Neurotech, a company that Mr. Sakharov is a shareholder and executive manager. During the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company purchased an aggregate of $167,659 and $47,042 of medical devices for resale and distribution from Neurotech. 

The Acquisition

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement for the Acquisition whereby Memory MD, Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, each holder of MemoryMD Shares outstanding immediately prior to the Closing received shares of our common stock in exchange therefore based on the Exchange Ratio, with all fractional shares rounded up to the nearest whole share. Accordingly, we issued 675,575 and 337,450 shares of our common stock to Messrs. Goldstein (and his wife) and Sakharov, respectively and 6,749,000 shares of our common stock to High Technology Capital Fund LP, an affiliate of Dr. Goldstein. Furthermore, as of the Closing, Mr. Amer Samad, the sole director and executive officer of All Soft Gels, committed to tender for cancellation 6,495,000 shares of our common stock as part of the conditions to Closing, of which 6,375,000 shares have been subsequently cancelled and of which 120,000 shares are expected to be tendered to us for cancellation as soon as practicable. The Merger Agreement also provided that Drs. Goldstein and Kukekov be appointed as a director of the Company upon the Closing of the Acquisition.

Related Person Transaction Policy

The Board reviews, approves and oversees any transaction between us and any related person and any other potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis, in accordance with our policies and procedures, and develops policies and procedures for the approval of related party transactions. Prior to consideration of a transaction with a related person, the material facts as to the related person’s relationship or interest in the transaction are disclosed to the disinterested directors. The transaction is not approved unless a majority of the members of the Board who are not interested in the transaction approve the transaction. The Board takes into account, among other factors that it deems appropriate, whether the related person transaction is on terms no less favorable to us than terms generally available in a transaction with an unrelated third-party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person’s interest in the related person transaction. Our current policy with respect to approval of related person transactions is not set forth in writing.

Director Independence

None of our directors is independent as that term is defined under the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.

SECURITIES BEING OFFERED

We are offering up to 1,111,111 Units, each consisting of five (5) shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and a warrant to purchase one (1) share of common stock, in this Offering.

Our authorized capital stock consists of 200,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share.

Common Stock

Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held of record by such holder with respect to all matters to be voted on or consented to by our stockholders, except as may otherwise be required by applicable Nevada law. A vote by the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares is required to effectuate certain fundamental corporate changes such as liquidation, merger or an amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation. Holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to share in all dividends that the board of directors, in its discretion, declares from legally available funds. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each outstanding share entitles its holder to participate pro rata in all assets that remain after payment of liabilities and after providing for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. The Company’s common stock has no pre-emptive rights, no conversion rights and there are no redemption provisions applicable to the Company’s common stock.

Blank-Check Preferred Stock

The Company’s articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, in one or more series, subject to any limitations prescribed by law, without further vote or action by the stockholders. Each such series of preferred stock shall have such number of shares, designations, preferences, voting powers, qualifications, and special or relative rights or privileges as shall be determined by our board of directors, which may include, among others, dividend rights, voting rights, liquidation preferences, conversion rights and preemptive rights. 

We did not have any share of preferred stock issued and outstanding as of the date of this circular.

Warrants

The warrants being offered as part of the Units are exercisable at a price of $2.25 per share, exercisable from the closing of the offering for a term of three (3) years, detachable from the Units upon closing of the offering. However, subject to limited exceptions as set forth in the warrant agreement, holders of the warrants may not transfer their warrants and neither do we intend to develop a trading market for the warrants. A form of the warrant agreement is attached herein as Exhibit 4.2.

LEGAL MATTERS

Certain legal matters regarding the securities being offered by this offering circular have been passed upon for us by Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP, New York, New York.

EXPERTS

Our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 have been audited by Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC, an independent registered public accounting firm. Such financial statements are included herein in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

This offering circular is part of an offering statement on Form 1-A that we filed with the SEC under Regulation A promulgated under the Securities Act and does not contain all the information set forth in the offering statement. Certain information in the offering statement has been omitted from this offering circular in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. We have also filed exhibits and schedules with the offering statement that are excluded from this offering circular. The offering statement is available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Because we are subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, we file annual, quarterly and current reports, and other information with the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Brain Scientific Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS