0001654954-18-010627.txt : 20180928 0001654954-18-010627.hdr.sgml : 20180928 20180928141930 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001654954-18-010627 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 1-A POS PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 FILED AS OF DATE: 20180928 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20180928 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: GK Investment Holdings, LLC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001656108 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: REAL ESTATE [6500] IRS NUMBER: 475223490 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 1-A POS SEC ACT: 1933 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 024-10510 FILM NUMBER: 181093607 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 257 EAST MAIN STREET STREET 2: SUITE 200 CITY: BARRINGTON STATE: IL ZIP: 60010 BUSINESS PHONE: 847-277-9930 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 257 EAST MAIN STREET STREET 2: SUITE 200 CITY: BARRINGTON STATE: IL ZIP: 60010 1-A POS 1 primary_doc.xml 1-A POS LIVE 0001656108 XXXXXXXX 024-10510 GK INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC DE 2015 0001656108 6500 47-5223490 0 0 257 EAST MAIN STREET SUITE 200 BARRINGTON IL 60010 8472779930 Rhys James Other 1569096.00 0.00 59206.00 55753225.00 58239508.00 491114.00 55416366.00 57921160.00 318348.00 58239508.00 2905125.00 2346715.00 1441872.00 -1093358.00 0.00 0.00 Eide Bailly LLP and Plante & Moran, PLLC Class A Units 616948650 000000000 None Class B Units 0 000000000 None N/A 0 000000000 N/A 7 percent Unsecured Bond 19458 40417L106 None true true Tier2 Audited Debt Y N N Y N N 50000 19548 1000.0000 50000000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50000000.00 JCC Advisors, LLC 1000000.00 JCC Advisors, LLC 2500000.00 Eide Bailly LLP and Plante & Moran, PLLC 75000.00 Kaplan Voekler Cunningham & Frank PLC 200000.00 GK Development, Inc. 1000000.00 Kaplan Voekler Cunningham & Frank PLC 75000.00 44650000.00 true AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY DC PR A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 B0 Z4 AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY DC PR A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 B0 Z4 true PART II AND III 2 gk_1apos.htm PART II AND III Blueprint
 

An offering statement pursuant to Regulation A relating to these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained in this Preliminary Offering Circular is subject to completion or amendment. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted before the offering statement filed with the Commission is qualified. This Preliminary Offering Circular shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor may there be any sales of these securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful before registration or qualification under the laws of any such state. We may elect to satisfy our obligation to deliver a Final Offering Circular by sending you a notice within two business days after the completion of our sale to you that contains the URL where the Offering Circular was filed may be obtained.
 
Preliminary Offering Circular
September 28, 2018
Subject to Completion
 
GK INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC
257 East Main Street, Suite 200
Barrington, IL 60010
(847) 277-9930
 
7% Unsecured Bonds
$50,000,000 Maximum Offering Amount (50,000 Bonds)
$5,000 Minimum Purchase (5 Bonds)
 
Explanatory Note
 
This Offering Circular is part of the postqualification amendment we filed in order to update the financial statements contained herein in accordance with Rule 252(f)(2)(i) of Regulation A. In addition to updating the financial statements presented herein, this amendment updates portfolio, financial and statistical data, and extends the offering termination date to September 30, 2019. All material terms of this offering otherwise remain the same.
 
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, referred to herein as our company, is offering 7% unsecured bonds, or the Bonds. The purchase price per Bond is $1,000, with a minimum purchase amount of $5,000. We may issue Bonds at volume-weighted discounts to certain investors. See “Plan of Distribution – Volume-Weighted Discount” for more information. The Bonds will mature on September 30, 2022 and will bear interest at a fixed rate of 7% per annum. Interest on the Bonds will be paid monthly on the 15th day of the month. The first interest payment on a Bond will be paid on the 15th day of the month following the issuance of such Bond. The Bonds will be offered to prospective investors on a best efforts basis by our Managing BrokerDealer, JCC Advisors, LLC, or JCC. “Best efforts” means that JCC is not obligated to purchase any specific number or dollar amount of Bonds, but will use its best efforts to sell the Bonds. JCC may engage additional brokerdealers, or Selling Group Members, who are members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, to assist in the sale of the Bonds. At each closing date, the proceeds for such closing will be disbursed to our company and Bonds relating to such proceeds will be issued to their respective investors. We commenced the sale of the Bonds on September 30, 2016. The offering will continue through the earlier of September 30, 2019 or the date upon which all $50,000,000 in offering proceeds have been received. As of the date of this Offering Circular, we have sold 19,458 Bonds, or $19,458,000, in the offering.
  
 
 
Price to Public
 
 
Managing Broker-Dealer Fee, Commissions and Expense Reimbursements(1)(2)
 
 
Proceeds to
Issuer
 
 
Proceeds to Other Persons
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Per Bond:
 $1,000.00(3)
 $81.20 
 $918.80 
 $0 
 
    
    
    
    
Maximum Offering Amount:
 $50,000,000.00 
 $4,060,000.00 
 $45,940,000.00 
 $0 
_________
 
(1)
This includes selling commissions of 5% and a Managing Broker-Dealer Fee of up to 3% of the gross proceeds of this offering to be paid on Bonds offered on a best efforts basis. All such amounts will be paid to JCC, who may reallow up to the entire amount of selling commissions and Managing-Broker Dealer Fee to Selling Group Members. JCC shall be entitled to retain, out of the Managing Broker-Dealer Fee, an amount equal to 0.57% of the gross proceeds of the offering. JCC may re-allow and pay to wholesalers and other participants in the offering up to the entirety of the remaining 2.43% portion of the Managing Broker-Dealer Fee. Any amount of the Managing Broker-Dealer Fee in excess of the 0.57% JCC is entitled to retain that is not re-allowed shall be returned to the Issuer. This also includes due diligence expense reimbursements of up to $60,000, 0.12% of the maximum offering amount. SeeUse of Proceeds” and “Plan of Distribution” for more information.
 
 
(2)
The table above does not include anticipated organizational and offering expenses of $275,000, blue sky fees of $75,000 and a promotional fee of 1.88% of the gross proceeds of this offering ($940,000 if the maximum offering amount is sold) to be paid to GK Development, Inc. in compensation for promoting this offering.
 
 
(3)
Assumes no Bonds are sold at a discount
 
Generally, no sale may be made to you in this offering if the aggregate purchase price you pay is more than 10% of the greater of your annual income or net worth. Different rules apply to accredited investors and non-natural persons. Before making any representation that your investment does not exceed applicable thresholds, we encourage you to review Rule 251(d)(2)(i)(C) of Regulation A. For general information on investing, we encourage you to refer to www.investor.gov.
 
An investment in the Bonds is subject to certain risks and should be made only by persons or entities able to bear the risk of and to withstand the total loss of their investment. Currently, there is no market for the Bonds being offered, nor does our company anticipate one developing. Prospective investors should carefully consider and review that risk as well as the RISK FACTORS beginning on page 8 of this Offering Circular.
 
THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, OR THE COMMISSION, DOES NOT PASS UPON THE MERITS OR GIVE ITS APPROVAL TO ANY SECURITIES OFFERED OR THE TERMS OF THE OFFERING, NOR DOES IT PASS UPON THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OFFERING CIRCULAR OR OTHER SELLING LITERATURE. THESE SECURITIES ARE OFFERED PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION WITH THE COMMISSION; HOWEVER, THE COMMISION HAS NOT MADE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION THAT THE SECURITIES OFFERED ARE EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION.
 
FORM S-11 DISCLOSURE FORMAT IS BEING FOLLOWED.
The date of this Offering Circular is September 28, 2018.
 
 
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Contents
 
 
 
OFFERING CIRCULAR SUMMARY
 
 
1
 
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
 
6
 
RISK FACTORS
 
 
7
 
USE OF PROCEEDS
 
 
23
 
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
 
 
25
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
 
32
 
GENERAL INFORMATION AS TO OUR COMPANY
 
 
35
 
POLICY WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES
 
 
37
 
INVESTMENT POLICIES OF OUR COMPANY
 
 
38
 
DESCRIPTION OF REAL ESTATE
 
 
42
 
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
 
 
48
 
DESCRIPTION OF BONDS
 
 
51
 
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
 
59
 
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
 
 
59
 
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
 
 
60
 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
 
62
 
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
 
 
63
 
SELECTION, RETENTION AND CUSTODY OF COMPANY’S INVESTMENTS
 
 
65
 
POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
 
 
66
 
COMPENSATION OF OUR MANAGER AND ITS AFFILIATES
 
 
67
 
LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY
 
 
71
 
EXPERTS
 
 
72
 
LEGAL MATTERS
 
 
73
 
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 
 
74
 
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
F-1
 
APPENDIX
 
 
A-1
 
 
 
 
 
OFFERING CIRCULAR SUMMARY
 
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Offering Circular. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider before deciding whether to invest in our Bonds. You should carefully read this entire Offering Circular, including the information under the heading “Risk Factors” and all information included in the Offering Circular.
 
Our Company. GK Investment Holdings, LLC was formed on September 14, 2015 to acquire existing income producing commercial rental properties. Our company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, holds title to (i) a commercial rental property located in Henderson, Nevada, and more commonly known as Lake Mead Crossing; and (ii) an office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California, or 2700 Ygancio.
 
Upon acquisition, Lake Mead Crossing consisted of multiple buildings aggregating approximately 221,200 square feet of rentable commercial space. Lake Mead Crossing is part of a larger shopping center, anchored by a Target. Lake Mead Crossing is owned by two of our subsidiaries. Upon acquisition, Lake Mead Partners, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lake Mead Parent, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of our company, owned a portion of Lake Mead Crossing consisting of approximately 155,100 square feet of rentable commercial space. Upon acquisition, Lake Mead Development, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of our company, owned the other portion of Lake Mead Crossing consisting of approximately 66,000 square feet of rentable commercial space.
 
On January 30, 2017, our Company, through 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Company, or Ygnacio Partners, acquired 2700 Ygnacio, from an unaffiliated seller. 2700 Ygnacio is a three-story, Class A office building with approximately 108,000 rentable square feet. As of June 30, 2018, it is 77.98% leased to numerous tenants under leases expiring on various dates between 2018 and 2022. Corrollo Engineers is the anchor tenant on the property, occupying 37,156 rentable square feet, or 34.41% of the property, under a lease currently scheduled to expire on October 31, 2019.
 
After the acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing, the Company, through LM Partners, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Pacific Dental Services, LLC, or PDCS, a former tenant in Lake Mead Crossing, whereby LM Partners agreed to sell to PDCS the building partially occupied by PDCS, containing approximately 7,800 rentable square feet, for $4,000,000, excluding prorations. The sale closed on March 20, 2017 and sale proceeds were used to pay down existing indebtedness related to our acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing.
 
As of June 30, 2018, the portion of Lake Mead Crossing owned by LM Partners is 97.2% leased and the portion of Lake Mead Crossing owned by LM Development is 52.5% leased.
 
Mr. Garo Kholamian is the beneficial owner of 67.81% of the outstanding units of our company, and his wife, Mrs. Nancy Kholamian, is the beneficial owner of 12.61% of the outstanding units of our company. Our company is solely managed by GK Development, Inc., or GK Development or our manager. GK Development was formed on May 19, 1994 under the laws of Illinois, and Mr. Garo Kholamian is the sole director and shareholder of GK Development. As a result, Mr. Garo Kholamian will effectively manage our company.
 
Our company does not intend to act as a land developer in that it is has no intent to invest in, acquire, own, hold, lease, operate, manage, maintain, redevelop, sell or otherwise use undeveloped real property or “raw land,” as a ground up development. Our company, engaging in its commercial real estate activities, may have the opportunity to acquire commercial real property which includes unimproved pad sites for future development and lease-up opportunities. In such instances, our company will retain the unimproved pad sites for ground lease, build-to-suit and/or sell opportunities. In situations where our company has the opportunity to acquire commercial real property which includes a large tract of developable raw land, the developable raw land will not be acquired by our company, but may be acquired by an entity affiliated with GK Development. Our company may choose to redevelop real property for an alternative use than intended when originally acquired or developed.
 
Our company is focused on investments in existing, income producing commercial rental properties that will benefit from GK Development’s real estate operating and leasing skills, including releasing, redeveloping, renovating, refinancing, repositioning, and selling. GK Development intends to actively participate in the management of our company’s properties rather than hold the properties as passive investments.
 
Certain affiliates of GK Development have agreed to loan us all cash flows received from equity interests they own in certain real property located at 5775 Beckley Road, Battle Creek, Michigan 49015 and more commonly known as Lakeview Square Mall, or Lakeview Square, and that certain real property located at 1888 Green Oaks Road, Fort Worth, Texas 76116 and more commonly known as Ridgmar Mall, or Ridgmar, in order to ensure we have sufficient reserves of cash and cash equivalents to fund 120% of our debt service obligations under the terms of the Bonds, or the Bond Service Obligations, for a period of three (3) months. The affiliates of GK Development that have agreed to lend us the cash flows received from Lakeview Square and Ridgmar are (i) Garo Kholamian and GKPI I Partners (Lakeview Square), LLC, or the Lakeview Lenders, which own an indirect 72% interest in Lakeview Square, and (ii) 1551 Kingsbury Partners, L.L.C., or Ridgmar Lender, which owns an indirect 12.5% interest in Ridgmar. Ridgmar Lender and Lakeview Lenders, together with any future parties to a Cash Flow Loan Agreement are referred to herein as, the Cash Flow Lenders. See “Description of Bonds - Certain Covenants” for more information.

 
1
 
 
Management. The sponsor of our company, GK Development, is a Barrington, Illinois based real estate acquisition and development company specializing in the acquisition, management, and redevelopment of commercial rental properties. Its management provides years of experience successfully acquiring, redeveloping and managing commercial rental properties. Mr. Garo Kholamian is the President and founder of GK Development. Prior to GK Development, Mr. Kholamian was Senior Vice President of Development for Homart Development Co., the real estate development arm of Sears Roebuck. In this position, he was instrumental in the development of shopping centers across the United States. See “Directors and Executive Officers” for more information on Mr. Kholamian and the seven other individuals responsible for the management of GK Development.
 
The Offering. Our company is offering to investors the opportunity to purchase up to a maximum of $50,000,000 of Bonds. See “Plan of Distribution   Who May Invest” for further information. We commenced the sale of the Bonds on September 30, 2016. As of the date of this Offering Circular, we have sold 19,548 Bonds, or $19,548,000, in the offering. The offering will continue through the earlier of September 30, 2019 or the date upon which all $50,000,000 in offering proceeds have been received, or the Offering Termination. Our company will conduct closings in this offering at its discretion, or the Closing Dates and each, a Closing Date, until the Offering Termination. On each Closing Date, offering proceeds for that closing will be disbursed to our company and the respective Bonds will be issued to investors in the offering, or the Bondholders. The offering is being made on a bestefforts basis through JCC.
 
Issuer
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC.
 
 
 
Securities Offered
 
$50,000,000, aggregate principal amount of the Bonds.
 
 
 
Maturity Date
 
September 30, 2022.
 
 
 
Interest Rate
 
7% per annum computed on the basis of a 365-day year.
 
 
 
Interest Payment Dates
 
Commencing on the 15th of the month following the issuance of such Bond and continuing monthly until the Maturity Date.
 
 
 
Price to Public
 
$1,000 per Bond.
 
 
 
Ranking
 
The Bonds are senior unsecured indebtedness of our company. They rank equally with our other senior unsecured indebtedness and are effectively subordinated to our secured indebtedness and structurally subordinated to all indebtedness of our subsidiaries.
 
 
 
Volume-Weighted Discount
 
We are offering a volume-weighted discount to the Price to the Public, or the Discount, for certain purchases of Bonds. The Discount is as follows:
 
 
Purchase Amount
 
Discount
 
 
Resulting Price Per Bond
 
 
20-29 Bonds
  3%
 $970 
 
30-39 Bonds
  4%
 $960 
 
40 or more Bonds
  5%
 $950 
 
Use of Proceeds
 
We estimate that the net proceeds from this offering, after deducting the estimated offering costs and expenses payable by our company, will be approximately $44,650,000. This assumes that we sell the maximum offering amount without the application of the Discount. We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to pay down existing indebtedness and acquire commercial rental properties in our target asset class.
 
 
 
Certain Covenants
 
The Bonds are being issued under an indenture, or the Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2016, between us and UMB Bank, as the trustee. The Indenture contains covenants that limit our ability to incur, or permit our subsidiaries to incur, third party indebtedness if certain debt to asset value and/or interest coverage ratios would be exceeded. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions, qualifications, limitations and specialized definitions. See “Description of Company’s Securities Certain Covenants” in this Offering Circular. The Bonds will be unsecured. however, our company will be required to own real property with aggregate equity value of at least 70% of the outstanding principal of the Bonds, or the EquityBond Ratio. For properties owned or acquired, directly or indirectly, by our company, the equity value for purposes of the EquityBond Ratio will initially be the equity invested into the applicable property. Each property will be required to be appraised, by an independent third party appraiser, annually during the term of the Bonds, and following any such appraisal, our company’s equity value from a newly appraised property will be adjusted to equal the appraised value of the property less the outstanding indebtedness secured by such property (and multiplied by our company’s ownership interest in the applicable property in the event we acquire a partial interest in any property). Our company will also be required to retain cash and cash equivalents, as defined by GAAP, equal to at least 120% of our company’s Bond Service Obligations for a period of three (3) months, or the Cash Coverage Ratio.
 
 
 
Forced Sale Agreements
 
 
Our company may be a party to certain agreements with UMB Bank and certain of GK Development's affiliates, whereby the trustee will be able to force the sale of the property underlying such agreement as a remedy if our company defaults on the Bonds, the trustee (or the bondholders if permitted) accelerates the maturity of the Bonds, and our company is otherwise unable to pay off the Bonds, in order to comply with the Equity-Bond Ratio. We refer to any such agreements as Forced Sale Agreements. During the pendency of any Forced Sale Agreements, the value of the equity in the underlying properties shall be included in the equity of our company for the purposes of calculating the Equity-Bond Ratio.
 
 
2
 
 
Cash Flow Loans
 
In order to assist us in meeting the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant, the Cash Flow Lenders have agreed that they will loan us up to all of the monthly cash flow received from their respective ownership interests in Ridgmar, Lakeview Square or any other equity interest subject to a Cash Flow Loan, upon our request and representation to them that we need such funds in order to comply with the Cash Coverage Ratio. We refer to any such loan as a Cash Flow Loan. The Cash Flow Loans will bear interest at the IRS imputed rate of interest and will mature on the Maturity Date. Nothing in the agreements governing the Cash Flow Loans precludes the sale of the equity ownership of the Cash Flow Lenders, or the real properties underlying them to third parties, and you will have no right to any proceeds of any such sale. However, we may enter into additional Cash Flow Loans with other affiliates of GK Development.
 
 
 
Change of Control - Offer to Purchase
 
If a Change of Control Repurchase Event as defined under “Description of Bonds - Certain Covenants” in this Offering Circular, occurs, we must offer to repurchase the Bonds at 1.02 times the Price to Public if on or before September 30, 2019; 1.015 times the Price to Public if such event occurs after September 30, 2019 but on or before the September 30, 2020; 1.01 times the Price to Public if such event occurs after September 30, 2020 but on or before September 30, 2021; and at the Price to Public if such event occurs after September 30, 2021, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including the repurchase date.
 
 
 
Optional Redemption
 
Prepayment penalties for calling Bonds early are as follows: Any accrued and unpaid interest up to but not including the repurchase rate plus 1.02 times the Price to Public if such event occurs on or before September 30, 2019; 1.015 times the Price to Public if such event occurs after September 30, 2019 but on or before September 30, 2020; 1.01 times the Price to Public if such event occurs after September 30, 2020 but on or before September 30, 2021; or at the Price to Public if such event occurs after September 30, 2021. See “Description of Bonds – Optional Redemption” for more information. In addition, due to death or incapacity, the Bondholders may be able to request a redemption of some or all of their Bonds. See “Description of Bonds – Redemption Upon Death or Disability” for more information.
 
 
 
Default
 
The Indenture contains events of default, the occurrence of which may result in the acceleration of our obligations under the Bonds in certain circumstances. Events of Default, (as defined herein) other than payment defaults, are subject to our company’s right to cure within 120 days of such Event of Default. Our company has the right to cure any payment default within 30 days before the trustee may declare a default and exercise the remedies under the indenture. See “Description of Company’s Securities - Event of Default” for more information.
 
 
3
 
 
Form
 
The Bonds are evidenced by global bond certificates deposited with nominee holders. The nominee holders are the Depository Trust Company, or DTC, or its nominee, Cede & Co., for those purchasers purchasing through a DTC participant subsequent to the Bonds gaining DTC eligibility and Direct Transfer LLC, or Direct Transfer, for those purchasers not purchasing through a DTC participant. See “Description of Company’s Securities - Book-Entry, Delivery and Form” for more information.
 
 
 
Denominations
 
We will issue the Bonds only in denominations of $1,000.
 
 
 
Payment of Principal and Interest
 
Principal and interest on the Bonds will be payable in U.S. dollars or other legal tender, coin or currency of the United States of America.
 
 
 
Future Issuances
 
We may, from time to time, without notice to or consent of the Bondholders, increase the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds outstanding by issuing additional bonds in the future with the same terms of the Bonds, except for the issue date and offering price, and such additional bonds shall be consolidated with the Bonds and form a single series.
 
 
4
 
 
 
 
 
Liquidity
 
This is a Tier 2, Regulation A offering where the offered securities will not be listed on a registered national securities exchange upon qualification. This offering is being conducted pursuant to an exemption from registration under Regulation A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We may apply for these qualified securities to be eligible for quotation on an alternative trading system or over the counter market, if we determine that such market is appropriate given the structure of the Bonds and our company and our business objectives. There is no guarantee that the Bonds will be publicly listed or quoted or that a market will develop for them. Please review carefully “Risk Factors - Investment Risk” for more information.
 
 
 
Trustee, Registrar and Paying Agent
 
We have designated UMB Bank as paying agent for the Bonds and Direct Transfer LLC as sub-paying agent in respect of Bonds registered to it. UMB Bank will act as trustee under the Indenture and registrar for the Bonds. The Bonds are being issued in book-entry form only, evidenced by global certificates, as such, payments are being made to DTC, its nominee or to Direct Transfer.
 
 
 
Governing Law
 
The Indenture and the Bonds are governed by the laws of the State of Delaware.
 
 
 
Material Tax Considerations
 
You should consult your tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning the Bonds in light of your own specific situation, as well as consequences arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
 
 
 
Risk Factors
 
We expect that any equity in a property that is subject to a Forced Sale Agreement may be financed using debt. We expect the terms of such debt to provide that the borrower will be in default if the ownership interest in the property, directly or indirectly, changes without lender consent. We expect that under terms of such loans, if the borrower is in default, the lender has the ability to accelerate the debt and charge certain penalties payable by the borrower. As a result, it may not be possible or it may be prohibitively expensive to sell the equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement without lender consent. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – The Effectiveness of our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement and call the loans of Lake Mead Crossing, 2700 Ygnacio and future acquired properties may be limited by covenants and penalties in debt documents for senior mortgages secured by the respective underlying properties” and “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement may be limited due to covenants contained in the senior and mezzanine debt secured by those properties” for more information.
 
The existing Cash Flow Loan Agreements and any future Forced Sale Agreements or Cash Flow Loan Agreements are not expected to limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders, or any other holder of equity subject to such an agreement, to sell their equity, nor do those agreements preclude a sale of the underlying real properties. In either circumstance, we would lose our rights to Cash Flow Loans relative to the interest sold, and the value of the interest sold would no longer be available to support the Equity-Bond Ratio or the repayment of the Bonds in the event the trustee exercised its rights under the Forced Sale Agreements. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Neither any future Forced Sale Agreements nor any current or future Cash Flow Loan Agreements limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders to sell their indirect equity in Lakeview Square, Ridgmar, or any equity subject to a future Forced Sale Agreement or Cash Flow Loan to an unaffiliated third party, nor do they preclude the sale of the underlying real properties” for more information.
 
We may enter into Forced Sale Agreements with affiliates. If we do, we anticipate the terms of the Forced Sale Agreements to be substantially similar to the expired Forced Sale Agreements related to Ridgmar and Lakeview Square, which were filed as exhibits to our Current Report on Form 1-U, filed with the SEC on October 6, 2016. As a result, the risks associated with the Forced Sale Agreements are expected to include, but not be limited to (i) the inability to effectively sell the affected equity due to restrictions contained in the underlying senior and mezzanine debt documents, (ii) the ability of the property owner to sell the property without the consent of the trustee, and (iii) the ability of the holder of the affected equity to sell the affected equity without the consent of the trustee.
 
An investment in our Bonds involves certain risks. You should carefully consider the risks above, as well as the other risks described under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 6 of this Offering Circular before making an investment decision.
 
 
5
 
 
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This Offering Circular contains certain forward-looking statements that are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “potential,” “intend,” “expect,” “outlook,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “approximately,” “believe,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” or other similar words or expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions, discuss future expectations, describe future plans and strategies, contain financial and operating projections or state other forward-looking information. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future events, actions, plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth or anticipated in our forward-looking statements. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our forward-looking statements and upon our business, results of operations, financial condition, funds derived from operations, cash flows, liquidity and prospects include, but are not limited to, the factors referenced in this Offering Circular, including those set forth below.
 
When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements in this Offering Circular. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements, which reflect our views as of the date of this Offering Circular. The matters summarized below and elsewhere in this Offering Circular could cause our actual results and performance to differ materially from those set forth or anticipated in forward-looking statements. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee future results or performance. Furthermore, except as required by law, we are under no duty to, and we do not intend to, update any of our forward-looking statements after the date of this Offering Circular, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
 
 
6
 
 
RISK FACTORS
 
An investment in our Bonds is highly speculative and is suitable only for persons or entities that are able to evaluate the risks of the investment. An investment in our Bonds should be made only by persons or entities able to bear the risk of and to withstand the total loss of their investment. Prospective investors should consider the following risks before making a decision to purchase our Bonds. To the best of our knowledge, we have included all material risks to investors in this section.
 
Risks Related to the Offering
 
The Bonds are unsecured obligations of our company and not obligations of our subsidiaries and are subordinated to any of our company’s current and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness and effectively subordinated to any future obligations of our company’s subsidiaries. Structural subordination increases the risk that we will be unable to meet our obligations on the Bonds.
 
The Bonds are unsecured, subordinated obligations of our company and will rank equally in right of payment with all of our company’s other unsecured indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any of our company’s future obligations that are by their terms expressly subordinated or junior in right of payment to the Bonds. The Bonds are effectively subordinated to any of our company’s existing or future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.
 
The Bonds are obligations exclusively of our company and not of any of its subsidiaries. None of our company’s subsidiaries is a guarantor of the Bonds and the Bonds are not required to be guaranteed by any subsidiaries our company may acquire or create in the future. The Bonds are also effectively subordinated to all of the liabilities of our company’s subsidiaries, to the extent of their assets, since they are separate and distinct legal entities with no obligation to pay any amounts due under our company’s indebtedness, including the Bonds, or to make any funds available to make payments on the Bonds. Our company’s right to receive any assets of any subsidiary in the event of a bankruptcy or liquidation of the subsidiary, and therefore the right of our company’s creditors to participate in those assets, will be effectively subordinated to the claims of that subsidiary’s creditors, including trade creditors, in each case to the extent that our company is not recognized as a creditor of such subsidiary. In addition, even where our company is recognized as a creditor of a subsidiary, our company’s rights as a creditor with respect to certain amounts are subordinated to other indebtedness of that subsidiary, including secured indebtedness to the extent of the assets securing such indebtedness.
 
Our covenants require only a 70% real property equity to principal ratio; therefore, if our trustee were to exercise its remedy to force the sale of our properties, such a sale may not generate sufficient proceeds to repay the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds.
 
One of our trustee’s and Bondholders’ principal remedies in the event of a default is to force the sale of the rental properties we acquire, or any equity interest subject to a Forced Sale Agreement. Under the Indenture we must maintain a ratio of 70% equity (inclusive of those equity interests subject to the Forced Sale Agreements) to the principal amount of outstanding Bonds, subject to our right to cure any deficiency within one hundred twenty (120) days of the occurrence of such deficiency. See “Description of Bonds - Event of Default” for more information. Because the amount of real property equity we are required to maintain will not cover the full principal amount of the Bonds, if we default on the Bonds and our trustee forces a sale of our real property, or exercises its rights under the Forced Sale Agreements, the proceeds of such sales may not be sufficient to fully repay the outstanding Bondholders.
 
The Bonds do not restrict or eliminate our company’s or its subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional debt or take other action that could negatively impact holders of the Bonds.
 
Subject to specified limitations in the Indenture and as described under “Description of Bonds - Certain Covenants,” the Indenture does not contain any provisions that would directly limit our company’s ability or the ability of its subsidiaries to incur indebtedness, including indebtedness that would be senior to the Bonds. The only limitation on our company’s or its subsidiaries’ ability to take on additional debt is the requirement to maintain our Equity-Bond Ratio.

 
7
 
 
The Effectiveness of our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement and call the loans of Lake Mead Crossing, 2700 Ygancio and future acquired properties may be limited by covenants and penalties in debt documents for senior mortgages secured by the respective underlying properties.
 
Our Bonds are unsecured and the primary remedy in the event of a default will be for our trustee (or sufficient Bondholders) to trigger sales of properties we own or any equity interest subject to a Forced Sale Agreement. We expect that any such properties may be financed with debt and that the terms of such debt will require that the ownership interest of such property, directly or indirectly, cannot change without lender’s consent. If the ownership changes without lender consent, the respective borrower under the respective loan will be in default. If either of the direct or indirect owners of such a property is found to be in default under any loans, your investment will be adversely affected. Lake Mead Crossing was financed using mortgage debt, mezzanine debt and interim debt. The loan documents evidencing both the mortgage debt and mezzanine debt carry prepayment penalties. 2700 Ygnacio was financed using mortgage debt and interim debt. The loan documents evidencing the mortgage debt carry prepayment penalties. Further, on newly acquired properties by our company following this Offering, we anticipate using senior secured debt to acquire each new property we purchase. Often senior lender loans secured by real property contain prepayment penalties and/or requirements of defeasance. Any such prepayment penalties or defeasance requirements may reduce the proceeds of any forced sale of our properties or may render such a sale prohibitively expensive. This would materially and adversely affect the repayment of your investment in the event of a default.
 
Lake Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio were purchased using a mixture of mortgage debt, mezzanine debt and interim debt. Due to prepayment penalties on the mortgage debt and mezzanine debt, we may be unable to pay down a portion of the indebtedness secured by the property.
 
Our company may use offering proceeds to pay down existing indebtedness secured by Lake Mead Crossing. More specifically, it may be prudent for our company to use offering proceeds to pay down the mezzanine debt held by an affiliate of our company. The mezzanine debt carries an interest rate of 8% and has a current outstanding principal balance of approximately $6,417,483. However, if we prepay the mezzanine debt, we may be required to pay prepayment penalties equal to 12-14% of the principal prepaid. If we are required to pay the prepayment penalty, we may not be able to or may not be willing to pay off that indebtedness. If we do not pay off our mezzanine debt, our debt service obligations may reduce our ability to make payments on the Bonds.
  
Our company may also use proceeds from this offering to pay down mortgage debt. Lake Mead Partners, LLC is a party to a mortgage loan secured by Lake Mead Crossing. That mortgage debt carries an interest rate of 4% and has a principal of approximately $25,537,783. However, if we prepay that debt, we may be required to pay prepayment penalties equal to 1% of the principal prepaid. If we are required to pay the prepayment penalty, we may not be able to or may not be willing to pay off that indebtedness. If we do not pay off that debt, our debt service obligations may reduce our ability to make payments on the Bonds.
 
The cash flow indirectly received from Lake Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio will be significantly impacted by the debt burden on the property.
 
We financed the purchase of Lake Mead Crossing using no equity and three layers of debt financing (mortgage debt, mezzanine debt and interim debt). We financed 2700 Ygnacio with limited equity and two layers of debt financing. We are required to make the debt service payments on each of these loans before making distributions to Bondholders. The debt burden is substantially higher on Lake Mead Crossing due to the amount of debt and the high interest rate on the mezzanine debt and interim debt. As a result, our ability to make payments to Bondholders when they become due may be adversely affected by the debt burden on Lake Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio.
 
If we sell substantially less than all of the Bonds we are offering, our investment objectives may become more difficult to reach.
 
While we believe we will be able to reach our investment objectives regardless of the amount of the raise, it may be more difficult to do so if we sell substantially less than all of the Bonds. Such a result may negatively impact our liquidity and increase our dependence on higher interest debt to acquire target properties. In that event, our investment costs will increase, which may decrease our ability to make payments to Bondholders.
 
 
8
 

Our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement may be limited due to covenants contained in the senior and mezzanine debt securing such property.
 
In order to comply with the Equity-Bond Ratio, we may enter into Forced Sale Agreements with affiliates whereby an equity interests of a property may be sold if our company does not comply with certain covenants in the Indenture. In such a circumstance, we expect that any such property will be financed with debt, the terms of each which will likely provide that the borrower will be in default if the property is transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered without lender consent. Terms will also likely provide that the borrower will be in default if the ownership interest in the property or the ownership interest of any entity directly or indirectly owning the property changes without lender consent. As a result, it may not be possible or it may be prohibitively expensive to sell the equity interests subject to a Forced Sale Agreement without lender consent.
 
Neither any future Forced Sale Agreements nor any current or future Cash Flow Loan Agreements limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders to sell their indirect equity in Lakeview Square, Ridgmar, or any equity subject to a future Forced Sale Agreement or Cash Flow Loan to an unaffiliated third party, nor do they preclude the sale of the underlying real properties.
 
Any future Forced Sale Agreements and any current or future Cash Flow Loan Agreements will not limit the rights of the holders of such equity to sell their equity, nor do those agreements preclude a sale of the underlying real properties. In either circumstance, we would lose our rights to Cash Flow Loans relative to the interest sold, and the value of the interest sold would no longer be available to support the Equity-Bond Ratio or the repayment of the Bonds in the event the trustee exercised its rights under the Forced Sale Agreements.
 
Our trustee shall be under no obligation to exercise any of the rights or powers vested in it by the Indenture at the request, order or direction of any of the Bondholders, pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture, unless such Bondholders shall have offered to the trustee reasonable security or indemnity against the costs, expenses and liabilities that may be incurred therein or thereby.
 
The Indenture provides that in case an Event of Default (as herein defined) in the Indenture shall occur and not be cured, the trustee will be required, in the exercise of its power, to use the degree of care of a reasonable person in the conduct of his own affairs. Subject to such provisions, the trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers under the Indenture at the request of any Bondholder, unless the Bondholder has offered to the trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to it against any loss, liability or expense.
 
Investment Risks
 
The Bonds will have limited transferability and liquidity.
 
There is no active market for the Bonds. Although we may apply for quotation of the Bonds on an alternative trading system or over the counter market, even if we obtain that quotation, we do not know the extent to which investor interest will lead to the development and maintenance of a liquid trading market. Further, the Bonds will not be quoted on an alternative trading system or over the counter market until after the termination of this offering, if at all. Therefore, investors will be required to wait until at least after the final termination date of this offering for such quotation. The initial public offering price for the Bonds has been determined by us. You may not be able to sell the Bonds you purchase at or above the initial offering price.
 
Alternative trading systems and over the counter markets, as with other public markets, may from time to time experience significant price and volume fluctuations. As a result, the market price of the Bonds may be similarly volatile, and Bondholders may from time to time experience a decrease in the value of their Bonds, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. The price of the Bonds could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, including those listed in this “Risk Factors” section of this Offering Circular.
 
No assurance can be given that the market price of the Bonds will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future or that Bondholders will be able to sell their Bonds when desired on favorable terms, or at all. Further, the sale of the Bonds may have adverse federal income tax consequences.

 
9
 
 
Our limited prior operating history makes it difficult for you to evaluate this investment.
 
We have limited prior operating history and may not be able to successfully operate our business or achieve our investment objectives. We may not be able to conduct our business as described in our plan of operation.
 
You will not have the opportunity to evaluate our investments before we make them and we may make real estate investments that would have changed your decision as to whether to invest in our Bonds.
 
As of the date of this offering circular, we own two properties, Lake Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio. We are not able to provide you with information to evaluate our additional investments prior to acquisition. We will seek to invest substantially all of the offering proceeds available for investment, after the payment of fees and expenses, in the acquisition of real estate and real estate related investments. We have established criteria for evaluating potential investments. See “Investment Policies of Company” for more information. However, you will be unable to evaluate the transaction terms, location, and financial or operational data concerning the investments before we invest in them. You will have no opportunity to evaluate the terms of transactions or other economic or financial data concerning our investments prior to our investment. You will be relying entirely on the ability of GK Development and its management team to identify suitable investments and propose transactions for GK Development, our sole manager, to oversee and approve. These factors increase the risk that we may not generate the returns that you seek by investing in our Bonds.
 
The inability to retain or obtain key personnel, property managers and leasing agents could delay or hinder implementation of our investment strategies, which could impair our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of Bonds and could reduce the value of your investment.
 
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of GK Development’s management team. We do not have employment agreements with any of these individuals nor do we currently have key man life insurance on any of these individuals. If any of them were to cease their affiliation with us or GK Development, GK Development may be unable to find suitable replacements, and our operating results could suffer. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon GK Development’s property managers’ and leasing agents’ ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for highly skilled personnel is intense, and GK Development and any property managers we retain may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. If we lose or are unable to obtain the services of highly skilled personnel, property managers or leasing agents, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and our ability to pay our Bond Service Obligations and repay principal may be materially and adversely affected.
 
We rely on JCC Advisors, LLC to sell our Bonds pursuant to this offering. If JCC Advisors, LLC is not able to market our Bonds effectively, we may be unable to raise sufficient proceeds to meet our business objectives.
 
We have engaged JCC Advisors, LLC to act as our Managing Broker-Dealer for this offering, and we rely on JCC Advisors, LLC to use its best efforts to sell the Bonds offered hereby. It would also be challenging and disruptive to locate an alternative Managing Broker-Dealer for this offering. Without improved capital raising, our portfolio will be smaller relative to our general and administrative costs and less diversified than it otherwise would be, which could adversely affect the value of your investment in us.
 
There are limited covenants to the Indenture.
 
The Indenture does not directly prevent our company from incurring unsecured indebtedness that is equal or subordinate in right of payment to the Bonds. For that reason, you should not consider the covenants in the Indenture as a significant factor in evaluating whether to invest in the Bonds.
 
An increase in the level of our outstanding indebtedness, or other events, could have an adverse impact on our business, properties, capital structure, financial condition, results of operations or prospects, which could adversely impact the Bonds. Any such event could also adversely affect our cost of borrowing, limit our access to the capital markets or result in more restrictive covenants in future debt arrangements.

 
10
 
 
Under certain circumstances, we may redeem the Bonds before maturity, and you may be unable to reinvest the proceeds at the same or a higher rate of return.
 
We may redeem all or a portion of the Bonds at any time. See “Description of Company’s Securities - Optional Redemption” for more information. While we are required to pay certain prepayment premiums on or prior to September 30, 2021, if redemption occurs, you may be unable to reinvest the money you receive in the redemption at a rate that is equal to or higher than the rate of return on the Bonds.
 
Risks Related to This Offering and Our Corporate Structure
 
Because we are dependent upon GK Development and its affiliates to conduct our operations, any adverse changes in the financial health of GK Development or its affiliates or our relationship with them could hinder our operating performance and our ability to meet our financial obligations.
 
We are dependent on GK Development and its affiliates to manage our operations and acquire and manage our portfolio of real estate assets. Our sole manager, GK Development makes all decisions with respect to the management of our company. GK Development depends upon the fees and other compensation that it receives from us in connection with the purchase, management and sale of our properties to conduct its operations. Any adverse changes in the financial condition of GK Development or our relationship with GK Development could hinder its ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments.
 
You will have no control over changes in our policies and day-to-day operations, which lack of control increases the uncertainty and risks you face as an investor in our Bonds. In addition, our sole manager and sponsor, GK Development, may change our major operational policies without your approval.
 
Our sole manager and sponsor, GK Development determines our major policies, including our policies regarding financing, growth, debt capitalization, and distributions. GK Development may amend or revise these and other policies without your approval. As a Bondholder, you will have no rights under the limited liability company agreement of our company, or our Operating Agreement. See “General Information as to Our Company - Operating Agreement” herein for a detailed summary of our Operating Agreement. 
 
GK Development is responsible for the day-to-day operations of our company and the selection and management of investments and has broad discretion over the use of proceeds from this offering. Accordingly, you should not purchase our Bonds unless you are willing to entrust all aspects of the day-to-day management and the selection and management of investments to GK Development. Specifically, GK Development is controlled by Mr. Garo Kholamian as sole stockholder and sole director, and as a result, he will be able to exert significant control over our operations. Our company has no board of managers and Mr. Kholamian has exclusive control over the operations of GK Development, Inc. and our company, as our manager. As a result, we are dependent on Mr. Kholamian rather than a group of managers to properly choose investments and manage our company. In addition, GK Development may retain independent contractors to provide various services for our company, and you should note that such contractors will have no fiduciary duty to you or the other Bondholders and may not perform as expected or desired.
 
Bondholders will have no right to remove our manager or otherwise change our management, even if we are underperforming and not attaining our investment objectives.
 
Only the members of our company have the right to remove our manager, and only if our manager has made a decision to file a voluntary petition or otherwise initiate proceedings to have it adjudicated insolvent, or to seek an order for relief as debtor under the United States Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.); to file any petition seeking any composition, reorganization, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under the present or any future federal bankruptcy laws or any other present or future applicable federal, state or other statute or law relative to bankruptcy, insolvency, or other relief for debtors; to seek the appointment of any trustee, receiver, conservator, assignee, sequestrator, custodian, liquidator (or other similar official) of our company or of all or any substantial part of the assets of our company, to make any general assignment for the benefit of creditors of our company, to admit in writing the inability of our company to pay its debts generally as they become due, or to declare or effect a moratorium on our company’s debt or to take any action in furtherance of any of the above proscribed actions. Bondholders will have no rights in the management of our company. As an investor in this offering, you will have no ability to remove our manager.

 
11
 
 
Our manager and its executive officers will have limited liability for, and will be indemnified and held harmless from, the losses of our company.
 
GK Development, our manager and its executive officers and their agents and assigns, will not be liable for, and will be indemnified and held harmless (to the extent of our company’s assets) from any loss or damage incurred by them, our company or the members in connection with the business of our company resulting from any act or omission performed or omitted in good faith, which does not constitute fraud, willful misconduct, gross negligence or breach of fiduciary duty. A successful claim for such indemnification could deplete our company’s assets by the amount paid. SeeGeneral Information as to Our Company - Operating Agreement - Indemnification” below for a detailed summary of the terms of our Operating Agreement. Our Operating Agreement is filed as an exhibit to the Offering Statement of which this Offering Circular is a part.
 
If we sell substantially less than all of the Bonds we are offering, the costs we incur to comply with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, regarding financial reporting and other fixed costs will be a larger percentage of our net income and may reduce the return on your investment.
 
We expect to incur significant costs in maintaining compliance with the financial reporting for a Tier II Regulation A issuer and that our management will spend a significant amount of time assessing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We do not anticipate that these costs or the amount of time our management will be required to spend will be significantly less if we sell substantially less than all of the Bonds we are offering.
 
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
 
Our sole manager, its executive officers and their affiliates face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase and leasing of properties, and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor, which could limit our investment opportunities, impair our ability to make distributions and reduce the value of your investment.
 
We rely on GK Development to identify suitable investment opportunities. We may be buying properties at the same time as other entities that are affiliated with or sponsored by GK Development. Other programs sponsored by GK Development or its affiliates also rely on GK Development, its executive officers and their affiliates for investment opportunities. GK Development has sponsored privately offered real estate programs and may in the future sponsor privately and publicly offered real estate programs that have investment objectives similar to ours. Therefore, GK Development and its affiliates could be subject to conflicts of interest between our company and other real estate programs. Many investment opportunities would be suitable for us as well as other programs. GK Development could direct attractive investment opportunities or tenants to other entities. Such events could result in our investing in properties that provide less attractive returns or getting less attractive tenants, impairing our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds and the value of your investment. See “Selection, Retention and Custody of Company’s Investments” and “Policies with Respect to Certain Transactions” for more information.
 
 
12
 
 
Payment of fees to GK Development and its affiliates will reduce cash available for investment and payment of our Bond Service Obligations.
 
GK Development and its affiliates perform services for us in connection with the selection and acquisition of our properties and other investments, and possibly the development, management and leasing of our properties. They are paid fees for these services, which reduces the amount of cash available for investment and for payment of our Bond Service Obligations. Although customary in the industry, the fees to be paid to GK Development and its affiliates were not determined on an arm’s-length basis. We cannot assure you that a third party unaffiliated with GK Development would not be willing to provide such services to us at a lower price. If the maximum offering amount is raised, without the application of any Discount we estimate that 2.55% of the gross proceeds of this offering will be paid to GK Development, its affiliates and third parties for upfront fees and expenses associated with the offer and sale of the Bonds. The expenses we actually incur in connection with the offer and sale of the Bonds, excluding acquisition and origination fees and expenses, may exceed the amount we expect to incur. In addition to this, GK Development will receive a 2% acquisition fee based on the purchase price of assets acquired from nonaffiliated, third party sellers, a 2% financing fee based on the amount of debt raised to acquire new assets or refinance existing assets, exclusive of any lender fees, and a 2% disposition fee based on the sales price of assets sold, exclusive of any brokerage fees. See “Selection, Retention and Custody of Company’s Investments” and “Policies with Respect to Certain Transactions” for more information.
 
GK Development will receive certain fees regardless of the performance of our company or an investment in the Bonds.
 
GK Development will receive a promoter’s fee equal to 1.88% of the gross offering proceeds, an acquisition fee equal to 2% of the purchase price of each acquired asset from non-affiliated, third party sellers, and a financing fee equal to 2% of the amount of debt raised to acquire new assets or refinance existing assets of our company. These fees will be paid regardless of our company’s success and the performance of the Bonds.
 
GK Development, as our manager, may increase the fees payable to it and/or its affiliates with the consent of a majority of the Bonds.
 
GK Development will have the power to contractually bind our company as its manager. As a result, GK Development may agree to increase the fees payable to it and/or its affiliates with the consent of a majority of the Bonds. For this purpose, a Bondholder will be deemed to have consented with respect to its Bonds if the Bondholder has not objected in writing within five (5) calendar days after the receipt of the consent request. As a result, GK Development may increase fees paid to it or its affiliates without the affirmative consent of the Bondholders.
 
GK Development and its affiliates, including our officers, face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and other programs sponsored by affiliates of GK Development, which could result in actions that are not in the long-term, best interests of our Bondholders.
 
GK Development and its affiliates receive fees from us. These fees could influence GK Development’s advice to us, as well as the judgment of the affiliates of GK Development who serve as our officers. Among other matters, the compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to property acquisitions from, or the making of investments in, other programs sponsored by GK Development, which might entitle affiliates of GK Development to disposition fees and other possible fees in connection with its services for the seller. See “Selection, Retention and Custody of Company’s Investments” and “Policies with Respect to Certain Transactions” for more information.
 
Considerations relating to their compensation from other programs could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of our Bondholders, which could hurt our ability to perform our obligations due under the Bonds or result in a decline in the value of your investment.

 
13
 
 
If the competing demands for the time of GK Development, its affiliates and our officers result in them spending insufficient time on our business, we may miss investment opportunities or have less efficient operations, which could reduce our profitability and impair our ability to honor our obligations under the Bonds.
 
We do not have any employees. We rely on the employees of GK Development and its affiliates for the day to day operation of our business. The amount of time that GK Development and its affiliates spend on our business will vary from time to time and is expected to be greater while we are raising money and acquiring properties. GK Development and its affiliates, including our officers, have interests in other programs and engage in other business activities. As a result, they will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between us and other programs and activities in which they are involved. Because these persons have competing interests on their time and resources, they may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, they may devote less time and fewer resources to our business than are necessary or appropriate to manage our business. We expect that as our real estate activities expand, GK Development will attempt to hire additional employees who would devote substantially all of their time to our business. There is no assurance that GK Development will devote adequate time to our business. If GK Development suffers or is distracted by adverse financial or operational problems in connection with its operations unrelated to us, it may allocate less time and resources to our operations. If any of these things occur, our ability to honor obligations under the Bonds may be adversely affected.
 
Our subsidiaries have mezzanine debt held by an affiliate of our manager, and there is nothing restricting us from procuring future debt financing from affiliates of our manager.
 
In order to finance Lake Mead Crossing, we received financing in the form of mezzanine debt from an affiliate of our manager, GK Secured Income IV, LLC, with a current outstanding principal balance of approximately $6,417,483 and interest rate of 8% per annum. We may use offering proceeds to repay this debt. There is nothing restricting us from receiving future debt financing from affiliates of our manager to make future investments. We believe the terms of the current loan are, and any future loans from an affiliate of our manager will be, fair and at market rates for such loans. However, we cannot assure you that a third party unaffiliated with GK Development would not be willing to provide current loan financing on better terms.
 
Risks Related to Investments in Commercial Rental Real Estate
 
Our operating results may be affected by economic conditions that have an adverse impact on the commercial real estate market in general, and may cause us to be unable to realize appreciation in the value of our commercial real estate properties.
 
Our operating results are subject to risks generally associated with the ownership of commercial real estate, including, but not limited to changes in general economic conditions, changes in interest rates and the availability of mortgage funds that may make the sale a of commercial real estate difficult. Although we intend to hold our commercial real estate and related investments until such a time as our sole manager, GK Development, determines that a sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous to our overall investment objectives; we cannot predict the various market conditions affecting commercial real estate investments that will exist at any particular time in the future. Because of this uncertainty, we cannot assure you that we will realize any appreciation in the value of our commercial real estate properties.
 
Competition from other commercial rental properties for tenants could reduce our profitability and impair our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 
The commercial rental property industry is highly competitive. This competition could reduce occupancy levels and revenues at our commercial rental properties, which would adversely affect our operations. We face competition from many sources. We face competition from other commercial rental properties both in the immediate vicinity and in the larger geographic market where our commercial rental properties will be located. Overbuilding of commercial rental properties may occur. If so, this will increase the number of units available and may decrease occupancy and rental rates. In addition, increases in operating costs due to inflation may not be offset by increased rental rates.

 
14
 
 
Increased construction of similar properties that compete with our commercial rental properties in any particular location could adversely affect the operating results of our commercial rental properties and our cash available to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 
We may acquire commercial rental properties in locations which experience increases in construction of properties that compete with our properties. This increased competition and construction could:
 
make it more difficult for us to find tenants to lease units in our commercial rental properties;
force us to lower our rental prices in order to lease units in our commercial properties; and/or
substantially reduce our revenues and cash available to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 
We compete with numerous other parties or entities for commercial real estate assets and tenants and may not compete successfully.
 
We compete with numerous other persons or entities engaged in commercial real estate investment activities, many of which have greater resources than we do. Some of these investors may enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. Our competitors may be willing to offer space at rates below our rates, causing us to lose existing or potential tenants.
 
Many of our investments will be dependent on tenants for revenue, and lease terminations could reduce our revenues from rents, resulting in the decline in the value of your investment.
 
The underlying value of our commercial properties and the ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds depend upon the ability of the tenants of our commercial properties to generate enough income to pay their rents in a timely manner, and the success of our investments depends upon the occupancy levels, rental income and operating expenses of our commercial properties and our company. Tenants’ inability to timely pay their rents may be impacted by employment and other constraints on their personal finances, including debts, purchases and other factors. These and other changes beyond our control may adversely affect our tenants’ ability to make lease payments. In the event of a tenant default or bankruptcy, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing the premises. We may be unable to re-lease the premises for the rent previously received. We may be unable to sell a commercial property with low occupancy without incurring a loss. These events and others could impair our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds and may also cause the value of your investment to decline.
 
Our operating results and distributable cash flow depend on our ability to generate revenue from leasing our commercial properties to tenants on terms favorable to us.
 
Our operating results depend, in large part, on revenues derived from leasing space in our commercial properties. We are subject to the credit risk of our tenants, and to the extent our tenants default on their leases or fail to make rental payments we may suffer a decrease in our revenue. In addition, if a tenant does not pay its rent, we may not be able to enforce our rights as landlord without delays and we may incur substantial legal costs. We are also subject to the risk that we will not be able to lease space in our commercial properties or that, upon the expiration of leases for space located in our commercial properties, leases may not be renewed, the space may not be re-leased or the terms of renewal or re-leasing (including the cost of required renovations or concessions to customers) may be less favorable to us than current lease terms. If vacancies continue for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues which would impair our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds. In addition, the resale value of the commercial property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property. Further, costs associated with commercial real estate investment, such as real estate taxes and maintenance costs, generally are not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment. These events would cause a significant decrease in revenues and could impair our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 
 
15
 
 
Costs incurred in complying with governmental laws and regulations may reduce our net income and the cash available for distributions.
 
Our company and the commercial properties we own and expect to own are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. Federal laws such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Federal Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act and the Hazard Communication Act and their resolutions and corresponding state and local counterparts govern such matters as wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials and the remediation of contamination associated with disposals. The commercial properties we acquire will be subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 which generally requires that certain types of buildings and services be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. These laws may require us to make modifications to our properties. Some of these laws and regulations impose joint and several liability on tenants, owners or operators for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were illegal. Compliance with these laws and any new or more stringent laws or regulations may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability. In addition, there are various federal, state and local fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply, and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance.
 
Our commercial properties may be affected by our tenants’ activities or actions, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our commercial properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties. The presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may make it difficult or impossible to sell or rent such property. Any material expenditures, fines, or damages we must pay will impair our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds and may reduce the value of your investment.
 
Any uninsured losses or high insurance premiums will reduce our net income and the amount of our cash available to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 
Our company will attempt to obtain adequate insurance to cover significant areas of risk to us, as a company, and to our commercial properties. However, there are types of losses at the property level, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters, which are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. We may not have adequate coverage for such losses. If any of our commercial properties incur a casualty loss that is not fully insured, the value of our assets will be reduced by any such uninsured loss. In addition, other than any working capital reserve or other reserves we may establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damaged property. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for insurance, we could suffer reduced earnings that would impair our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 
As part of otherwise attractive properties, we may acquire some properties with existing lock out provisions, which may inhibit us from selling a commercial property, or may require us to maintain specified debt levels for a period of years on some properties.
 
Loan provisions could materially restrict us from selling or otherwise disposing of or refinancing commercial properties. These provisions would affect our ability to turn our investments into cash and thus affect cash available to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds, including if the trustee exercised its remedy to force the sale of the commercial properties we acquire. Loan provisions may prohibit us from reducing the outstanding indebtedness with respect to commercial properties, refinancing such indebtedness on a non-recourse basis at maturity, or increasing the amount of indebtedness with respect to such properties.

 
16
 
 
Loan provisions could impair our ability to take actions that would otherwise be in the best interests of the Bondholders and, therefore, may have an adverse impact on the value of your investment, relative to the value that would result if the loan provisions did not exist. In particular, loan provisions could preclude us from participating in major transactions that could result in a disposition of our assets or a change in control even though that disposition or change in control might be in the best interests of our Bondholders.
 
If we elect to improve any vacant portions of, or redevelop, our acquired properties, such actions will expose us to additional risks beyond those associated with owning and operating commercial rental properties and could materially and adversely affect us.
 
We may redevelop one or more of our acquired properties or improve vacant portions of our acquired properties, including the vacant pad sites at Lake Mead Crossing. If we elect to do so, we will be subject to additional risks and our business may be adversely affect by:
 
abandonment of redevelopment or improvement opportunities after expending significant cash and other resources to determine feasibility, requiring us to expense costs incurred in connection with the abandoned project;
 
construction costs of a project exceeding our original estimates;
 
failure to complete a project on schedule or in conformity with building plans and specifications;
 
the lack of available construction financing on favorable terms or at all;
 
the lack of available permanent financing upon completion of a project initially financed through construction loans on favorable terms or at all;
 
failure to obtain, or delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations;
 
liability for injuries and accidents occurring during the construction process and for environmental liabilities, including those that may result from off-site disposal of construction materials;
 
our inability to comply with any build-to-suit tenant’s procurement standards and processes in place from time to time; and
 
circumstances beyond our control, including: work stoppages, labor disputes, shortages of qualified trades people, such as carpenters, roofers, electricians and plumbers, changes in laws relating to union organizing activity, lack of adequate utility infrastructure and services, our reliance on local subcontractors, who may not be adequately capitalized or insured, and shortages, delay in availability, or fluctuations in prices of, building materials.
 
Any of these circumstances could give rise to delays in the start or completion of, or could increase the cost of, redeveloping or improving one or more of our acquired properties. We cannot assure you that we will be able to recover any increased costs by raising our lease rates. Additionally, due to the amount of time required for planning, constructing and leasing of redevelopment projects, we may not realize a significant cash return for several years. Furthermore, any of these circumstances could hinder our growth and materially and adversely affect us. In addition, new redevelopment or improvement activities, regardless of whether or not they are ultimately successful, typically require substantial time and attention from management.
 
 
17
 
 
General Risks Related to Real Estate-Related Investments
 
If we make or invest in mortgage loans as part of our plan to acquire the underlying property, our mortgage loans may be affected by unfavorable real estate market conditions, including interest rate fluctuations, which could decrease the value of those loans and the return on your investment.
 
If we make or invest in mortgage loans, we will be at risk of defaults by the borrowers on those mortgage loans as well as interest rate risks. To the extent we incur delays in liquidating such defaulted mortgage loans; we may not be able to obtain sufficient proceeds to repay all amounts due to us under the mortgage loan. Further, we will not know whether the values of the properties securing the mortgage loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of those mortgage loans. If the values of the underlying properties fall, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with such loans.
 
Investments in real estate-related securities will be subject to specific risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities and may be subject to the general risks of investing in subordinated real estate securities, which may result in losses to us.
 
We may invest in real estate related securities of both publicly traded and private real estate companies. Issuers of real estate related equity securities generally invest in real estate or real estate related assets and are subject to the inherent risks associated with real estate related investments discussed in this Offering Circular, including risks relating to rising interest rates.
 
Real estate-related securities are often unsecured and also may be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. As a result, investments in real estate-related securities are subject to risks of: (1) limited liquidity in the secondary trading market in the case of unlisted or thinly traded securities; (2) subordination to the prior claims of banks and other senior lenders to the issuer; (3) the operation of mandatory sinking fund or call/redemption provisions during periods of declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to reinvest redemption proceeds in lower yielding assets; (4) the possibility that earnings of the issuer may be insufficient to meet its debt service and distribution obligations and (5) the declining creditworthiness and potential for insolvency of the issuer during periods of rising interest rates and economic slowdown or downturn. These risks may adversely affect the value of outstanding real estate-related securities and the ability of the issuers thereof to repay principal and interest or make distribution payments.
 
Investments in real estate-related securities may be illiquid, and we may not be able to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions.
 
If we invest in certain real estate-related securities that we may purchase in connection with privately negotiated transactions, they will not be registered under the relevant securities laws, resulting in a prohibition against their transfer, sale, pledge or other disposition except in a transaction that is exempt from the registration requirements of, or is otherwise in accordance with, those laws. As a result, our ability to vary our long-term stabilized portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited. The subordinated and bridge loans we may purchase will be particularly illiquid investments due to their short life. Moreover, in the event of a borrower’s default on an illiquid real estate security, the unsuitability for securitization and potential lack of recovery of our investment could pose serious risks of loss to our investment portfolio.
 
Delays in restructuring or liquidating non-performing real estate-related securities could reduce our ability to honor our obligations under the Bonds.
 
If we invest in real estate-related securities, they may become non-performing after acquisition for a wide variety of reasons. Such non-performing real estate investments may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations and/or restructuring, which may entail, among other things, a substantial reduction in the interest rate and a substantial write down of such loan or asset. However, even if a restructuring is successfully accomplished, upon maturity of such real estate security, replacement “takeout” financing may not be available. We may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on some of the collateral securing one or more of our investments. Intercreditor provisions may substantially interfere with our ability to do so. Even if foreclosure is an option, the foreclosure process can be lengthy and expensive. Borrowers often resist foreclosure actions by asserting numerous claims, counterclaims and defenses, including, without limitation, lender liability claims and defenses, in an effort to prolong the foreclosure action. In some states, foreclosure actions can take up to several years or more to litigate. At any time during the foreclosure proceedings, the borrower may file for bankruptcy, which would have the effect of staying the foreclosure action and further delaying the foreclosure process. Foreclosure litigation tends to create a negative public image of the collateral property and may result in disrupting ongoing leasing and management of the property. Foreclosure actions by senior lenders may substantially affect the amount that we may receive from an investment.
 
 
18
 
  
Your investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act; if we are subject to registration under the Investment Company Act, we will not be able to continue our business.
 
Neither we, nor any of our subsidiaries intend to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. We expect that our subsidiaries’ investments in real estate will represent the substantial majority of our total asset mix, which would not subject us to the Investment Company Act. In order to maintain an exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act, we intend to engage, through our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, primarily in the business of buying real estate, and these investments must be made within a year after this offering ends. If we are unable to invest a significant portion of the proceeds of this offering in properties within one year of the termination of this offering, we may avoid being required to register as an investment company by temporarily investing any unused proceeds in government securities with low returns, which would reduce the cash available for fulfilling our obligations under the Bonds.
 
We expect that most of our assets will be held through wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries of our company. We expect that most of these subsidiaries will be outside the definition of investment company under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act as they are generally expected to hold at least 60% of their assets in real property or in entities that they manage or co-manage that own real property. Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, which we refer to as the 40% test. Excluded from the term “investment securities,” among other things, are U.S. government securities and securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company set forth in Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. We believe that we, and our subsidiaries, will not fall within either definition of investment company as we intend to invest primarily in real property, through our wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries, the majority of which we expect to have at least 60% of their assets in real property or in entities that they manage or co-manage that own real property. As these subsidiaries would be investing either solely or primarily in real property, they would be outside of the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. We are organized as a holding company that conducts its businesses primarily through its subsidiaries. Both we and our operating partnership intend to conduct our operations so that they comply with the 40% test. We will monitor our holdings to ensure continuing and ongoing compliance with this test. In addition, we believe that neither we nor our subsidiaries will be considered an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act because neither we nor the operating partnership will engage primarily or hold itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Rather, through wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries, we will be primarily engaged in the non-investment company businesses of these subsidiaries.
 
In the event that the value of investment securities held by the subsidiaries of our company were to exceed 40%, we expect our subsidiaries to be able to rely on the exclusion from the definition of “investment company” provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. Section 3(c)(5)(C), as interpreted by the staff of the SEC, requires each of our subsidiaries relying on this exception to invest at least 55% of its portfolio in “mortgage and other liens on and interests in real estate,” which we refer to as “qualifying real estate assets” and maintain at least 80% of its assets in qualifying real estate assets or other real estate-related assets. The remaining 20% of the portfolio can consist of miscellaneous assets. What we buy and sell is therefore limited to these criteria. How we determine to classify our assets for purposes of the Investment Company Act will be based in large measure upon no action letters issued by the SEC staff in the past and other SEC interpretive guidance. These no action positions were issued in accordance with factual situations that may be substantially different from the factual situations we may face, and a number of these no-action positions were issued more than ten years ago. Pursuant to this guidance, and depending on the characteristics of the specific investments, certain mortgage loans, participations in mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, mezzanine loans, joint venture investments and the equity securities of other entities may not constitute qualifying real estate assets and therefore investments in these types of assets may be limited. No assurance can be given that the SEC will concur with our classification of our assets. Future revisions to the Investment Company Act or further guidance from the SEC may cause us to lose our exclusion from registration or force us to re-evaluate our portfolio and our investment strategy. Such changes may prevent us from operating our business successfully.

 
19
 
 
In the event that we, or our subsidiaries, were to acquire assets that could make either our company or the respective subsidiary fall within the definition of investment company under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, we believe that we would still qualify for an exclusion from registration pursuant to Section 3(c)(6). Section 3(c)(6) excludes from the definition of investment company any company primarily engaged, directly or through majority-owned subsidiaries, in one or more of certain specified businesses. These specified businesses include the business described in Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. It also excludes from the definition of investment company any company primarily engaged, directly or through majority-owned subsidiaries, in one or more of such specified businesses from which at least 25% of such company’s gross income during its last fiscal year is derived, together with any additional business or businesses other than investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities. Although the SEC staff has issued little interpretive guidance with respect to Section 3(c)(6), we believe that we and subsidiaries may rely on Section 3(c)(6) if 55% of the assets of our operating partnership consist of, and at least 55% of the income of our subsidiaries is derived from, qualifying real estate assets owned by wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership.
 
To ensure that neither we, nor our subsidiaries, are required to register as an investment company, each entity may be unable to sell assets they would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets they would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we or our subsidiaries may be required to acquire additional income or loss-generating assets that we might not otherwise acquire or forego opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire. Although we and our subsidiaries intend to monitor our portfolio periodically and prior to each acquisition or disposition, any of these entities may not be able to maintain an exclusion from registration as an investment company. If we or our subsidiaries are required to register as an investment company but fail to do so, the unregistered entity would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against such entity. In addition, the contracts of such entity would be unenforceable unless a court required enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of the entity and liquidate its business.
 
Risks Associated with Debt Financing
 
We use debt financing to acquire properties and otherwise incur other indebtedness, which increases our expenses and could subject us to the risk of losing properties in foreclosure if our cash flow is insufficient to make loan payments.
 
We are permitted to acquire real properties and other real estate-related investments including entity acquisitions by assuming either existing financing secured by the asset or by borrowing new funds. In addition, we may incur or increase our mortgage debt by obtaining loans secured by some or all of our assets to obtain funds to acquire additional investments or to pay our Bond Service Obligations under our Bonds. If we mortgage a property and have insufficient cash flow to service the debt, we risk an event of default which may result in our lenders foreclosing on the properties securing the mortgage.
 
High levels of debt or increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our loan payments, which could reduce our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 
Our policies do not limit us from incurring debt. High debt levels could cause us to incur higher interest charges, result in higher debt service payments, and may be accompanied by restrictive covenants. Interest we pay reduces cash available to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds. Additionally, with respect to any variable rate debt, increases in interest rates may increase our interest costs, which would reduce our cash flow and our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds. In addition, if we need to repay debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments in properties at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments and could result in a loss. In addition, if we are unable to service our debt payments, our lenders may foreclose on our interests in the real property that secures the loans we have entered.

 
20
 
 
High mortgage rates may make it difficult for us to finance or refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire, our cash flow from operations and restrict our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 
Our ability to acquire properties or to make capital improvements to or remodel properties will depend on our ability to obtain debt or equity financing from third parties or the sellers of properties. If mortgage debt is unavailable at reasonable rates, we may not be able to finance the purchase of properties. If we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance the properties when the debt becomes due or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when we refinance the properties, our income could be reduced. We may be unable to refinance properties. If any of these events occur, our cash flow would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduce cash available to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds and may hinder our ability to raise additional funds from capital contributions, additional bonds or borrowing more money.
 
We use mezzanine financing to acquire properties, which increases our expenses and could reduce our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 
Our policies do not limit us from incurring mezzanine debt. Mezzanine debt generally carries higher interest rates and could result in higher debt service payments, and may be accompanied by restrictive covenants. Interest we pay reduces cash available to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds. In addition, if we are unable to service our mezzanine debt payments, our mezzanine lenders may foreclose on our ownership interests securing such mezzanine loans. Some of our mezzanine financing may come from affiliates. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions – Mezzanine Debt.”
 
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 
When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the property, discontinue insurance coverage, or replace our manager. These or other limitations may limit our flexibility and prevent us from achieving our operating goals. Prepayment penalties or defeasance requirements required by lenders may make it economically infeasible for our trustee to exercise the forced sale remedy regarding our acquired properties.
 
Our ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms would be impacted by negative capital market conditions.
 
Recently, domestic and international financial markets have experienced unusual volatility and uncertainty. Although this condition occurred initially within the “subprime” single family mortgage lending sector of the credit market, liquidity has tightened in overall financial markets, including the investment grade debt and equity capital markets. Consequently, there is greater uncertainty regarding our ability to access the credit market in order to attract financing on reasonable terms. Investment returns on our assets and our ability to make acquisitions could be adversely affected by our inability to secure financing on reasonable terms, if at all.
 
Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default and ultimately may reduce our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 
We may finance our property acquisitions using interest-only mortgage indebtedness. During the interest-only period, the amount of each scheduled payment will be less than that of a traditional amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage loan will not be reduced (except in the case of prepayments) because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal during this period. After the interest only period, we will be required either to make scheduled payments of amortized principal and interest or to make a lump sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. These required principal or balloon payments will increase the amount of our scheduled payments and may increase our risk of default under the related mortgage loan. If the mortgage loan has an adjustable interest rate, the amount of our scheduled payments also may increase at a time of rising interest rates. Increased payments and substantial principal or balloon maturity payments will reduce the funds available to honor our obligations under the Bonds because cash otherwise available for payment will be required to pay principal and interest associated with these mortgage loans.

 
21
 
 
To hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we may use derivative financial instruments that may be costly and ineffective, may reduce the overall financial benefit of your investment, and may expose us to the credit risk of counterparties.
 
We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to interest rate fluctuations on loans secured by our assets and investments in collateralized mortgage-backed securities. Derivative instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions will be determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge and may differ from time to time.
 
To the extent that we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to financing, basis risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. We intend to manage credit risk by dealing only with major financial institutions that have high credit ratings. Basis risk occurs when the index upon which the contract is based is more or less variable than the index upon which the hedged asset or liability is based, thereby making the hedge less effective. We intend to manage basis risk by matching, to a reasonable extent, the contract index to the index upon which the hedged asset or liability is based. Finally, legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract. We intend to manage legal enforceability risks by ensuring, to the best of our ability, that we contract with reputable counterparties and that each counterparty complies with the terms and conditions of the derivative contract. If we are unable to manage these risks effectively, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
 

 
22
 
 
USE OF PROCEEDS
 
We estimate that the net proceeds from this offering, after deducting the underwriting compensation and offering costs and expenses payable by us, will be approximately $44,650,000, assuming that the maximum amount of Bonds are purchased and issued. We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to pay down existing indebtedness and acquire properties in our target asset classes. The remaining proceeds will be used to pay fees and expenses of this offering, and fees and expenses related to selection and acquisition of investments. If we do not sell the maximum number of Bonds, our net proceeds from the offering will be reduced; however, we will still use net proceeds from the offering to pay down existing indebtedness and acquire properties in our target asset class. A summary of the anticipated use of the proceeds is below:
 
 
 
Maximum Offering
 
 
 
Amount
 
 
Percent
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross offering proceeds(1)
 $50,000,000 
  100.00%
Less offering expenses:
    
    
Selling commissions and Managing Broker-Dealer Fee (2)
 $4,000,000 
  8.00%
Due Diligence Expense Reimbursements (3)
 $60,000 
  0.12%
Organization and offering expenses (4)
 $275,000 
  0.55%
Less Promotional Fee (5)
 $940,000 
  1.88%
Less Blue-Sky Filing Fees
 $75,000 
  0.15%
Amount available for investment
 $44,650,000 
  89.30%
______________
 
(1)
This assumes we sell the remaining Bonds at the Price to the Public. We may issue the remaining Bonds with a vonule-weighted discount, or the Discount, of up to 5%. If we issue the remaining Bonds with the maximum Discount, gross offering proceeds will be $48,477,400 and the amount available for investment will be $43,273,778.
 
     
(2)
Includes selling commissions equal to 5% of aggregate gross offering proceeds and a Managing Broker-Dealer Fee of up to 3% of aggregate gross offering proceeds, both of which are payable to the Managing Broker-Dealer. Our Managing Broker-Dealer, in its sole discretion, intends to reallow selling commissions of up to 5% of aggregate gross offering proceeds to unaffiliated broker-dealers participating in this offering attributable to the amount of Bonds sold by them. Our Managing-Broker Dealer shall be entitled to retain, out of the Managing Broker-Dealer Fee, an amount equal to 0.57% of the gross proceeds of the offering. JCC may re-allow and pay to wholesalers and other participants in the offering up to the entirety of the remaining 2.43% portion of the Managing Broker-Dealer Fee. Any amount of the Managing Broker-Dealer Fee in excess of the 0.57% JCC is entitled to retain that is not re-allowed shall be returned to the Issuer. See “Plan of Distribution” in this Offering Circular for a description of such provisions.
 
 
(3)
We have agreed to pay up to $60,000 in due diligence expense reimbursements to our Managing Broker-Dealer, which it may reallow to participating broker dealers. To date, we have paid $23,458 in due diligence expense reimbursements to our Managing Broker-Dealer.
 
(4)
Organization and offering expenses include all expenses (other than those listed in the chart) to be paid by us in connection with the offering, including our legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees, charge of our escrow holder, and amounts to reimburse our manager for its portion of the salaries of the employees of its affiliates who provide services to our manager and other costs in connection with administrative oversight of the offering and marketing process and preparing supplemental sales materials, holding educational conferences and attending retail seminars conducted by broker-dealers. As of the date of this Offering Circular, organization and offering expenses total $107,514. Start-up and organization costs will be expensed as incurred and syndication costs will be reflected as a reduction of member’s equity and will be allocated to the member’s capital accounts upon the sale or liquidation of our company. Our manager will not be reimbursed for the direct payment of such organization and offering expenses that exceed 0.55% of the aggregate gross proceeds of this offering over the life of the offering. We will not reimburse our manager for any portion of the salaries and benefits to be paid to its executive officers named in “Directors and Executive Officers.
 
 
(5)
We will pay our manager, a 1.88% promotional fee for its services in organizing and structuring this offering. The fee will be paid following each closing of this offering. To date, we have paid our manager $367,502 as a promotional fee.
 
 
23
 
 
(6)
Until required in connection with the acquisition of properties, substantially all of the net proceeds of the offering and, thereafter, any working capital reserves we may have, may be invested in short-term, highly-liquid investments, including government obligations, bank certificates of deposit, short-term debt obligations and interest-bearing accounts. Funds available for investment may be used to acquire or invest in new properties, pay down existing indebtedness (including debt held by affiliates) or for certain development related costs consistent with our business plan. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions – Mezzanine Debt” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions – Interim Debt” for more details regarding current indebtedness that may be paid down using offering proceeds.
 
 
 
If we sell substantially less than the maximum offering amount and are unable to acquire properties with the proceeds from this offering and conventional mortgage debt, then we may use all of the proceeds from this offering to pay down and manage our existing debt and future debt used to acquire properties.
 
 
 
With the proceeds of this offering we may pay down our existing mezzanine debt associated with the acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing. Lake Mead Parent, LLC, the owner of Lake Mead Partners, LLC and Lake Mead Development, LLC received mezzanine debt to purchase Lake Mead Crossing from an affiliate of our manager, GK Secured Income IV, LLC, or GKSI IV. Lake Mead Parent and Lake Mead Development are wholly-owned subsidiaries of our company. Under the promissory note, Lake Mead Parent, LLC and Lake Mead Development, LLC can borrow up to $10,500,000 at 8% interest. The mezzanine loan requires monthly interest payments only. The loan matures on November 12, 2018. Currently, the mezzanine loan has an outstanding principal of approximately $6,417,483. GKSI IV was funded by independent, third party investors. Pursuant to the terms of their investments and the promissory note for the mezzanine loan, if the mezzanine loan is prepaid, which results in GKSI IV being obligated to pay a yield maintenance fee to the members of GKSI IV, Lake Mead Partners, LLC and Lake Mead Development, LLC will be obligated to pay to GKSI IV an amount equal to such yield maintenance fee. If the yield maintenance fee becomes payable (a) during the first year that a member holds a unit in GKSI IV, the yield maintenance fee will be an amount equal to 12% per annum on the repayment amounts for the remainder of such year after the repayment date; (b) during the second year that a member holds a unit, the yield maintenance fee will be an amount equal to 13% per annum on the repayment amounts for the remainder of such year after the repayment date; or (c) during the third year that the member holds a unit, the yield maintenance fee will be an amount equal to 12-14% per annum on the repayment amounts for the remainder of such year after the repayment date. If loan is repaid within the thrid year (ending November 12, 2018), LM Partners and LM Development would be obligated to pay a prepaymoney penalty of approximately $3,341,380. This amount has been measured as of June 30, 2018 using a 128 per annum rate for the first year, 13% per annum rate for the second year and a 14% per annum rate for the thrid year.
 
 
 
With the proceeds of this offering, we may pay down our existing interim debt associated with the acquisitions of Lake Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio. Lake Mead Partners, LLC received an interim loan from our manager in the amount of $2,608,100 in connection with our acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing. This loan has been fully repaid.
 
2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC received an interim loan from our manager in the amount of $2,305,000 in connection with our acquisition of 2700 Ygnacio. This loan has been repaid.
 
 
 
24
 

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
 
Who May Invest
 
As a Tier II, Regulation A offering, investors must comply with the 10% limitation to investment in the offering, as prescribed in Rule 251. The only investor in this offering exempt from this limitation is an accredited investor, an “Accredited Investor,” as defined under Rule 501 of Regulation D. If you meet one of the following tests you qualify as an Accredited Investor:
 
 
(i)
You are a natural person who has had individual income in excess of $200,000 in each of the two most recent years, or joint income with your spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of these years, and have a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year;
 
 
 
 
(ii)
You are a natural person and your individual net worth, or joint net worth with your spouse, exceeds $1,000,000 at the time you purchase the Bonds (please see below on how to calculate your net worth);
 
 
 
 
(iii)
You are an executive officer or general partner of the issuer or a manager or executive officer of the general partner of the issuer;
 
 
 
 
(iv)
You are an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the Code, a corporation, a Massachusetts or similar business trust or a partnership, not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the Bonds, with total assets in excess of $5,000,000;
 
 
 
 
(v)
You are a bank or a savings and loan association or other institution as defined in the Securities Act, a broker or dealer registered pursuant to Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Exchange Act, an insurance company as defined by the Securities Act, an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the Investment Company Act, or a business development company as defined in that act, any Small Business Investment Company licensed by the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 or a private business development company as defined in the Investment Advisers Act of 1940;
 
 
 
 
(vi)
You are an entity (including an Individual Retirement Account trust) in which each equity owner is an accredited investor;
 
 
 
 
(vii)
You are a trust with total assets in excess of $5,000,000, your purchase of the Bonds is directed by a person who either alone or with his purchaser representative(s) (as defined in Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act) has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that he is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective investment, and you were not formed for the specific purpose of investing in the Bonds; or
 
 
 
 
(viii)
You are a plan established and maintained by a state, its political subdivisions, or any agency or instrumentality of a state or its political subdivisions, for the benefit of its employees, if such plan has assets in excess of $5,000,000.
 
Under Rule 251 of Regulation A, non-accredited, non-natural investors are subject to the investment limitation and may only invest funds which do not exceed 10% of the greater of the purchaser’s revenue or net assets (as of the purchaser’s most recent fiscal year end). A non-accredited, natural person may only invest funds which do not exceed 10% of the greater of the purchaser’s annual income or net worth (please see below on how to calculate your net worth).
 
NOTE: For the purposes of calculating your net worth, Net Worth is defined as the difference between total assets and total liabilities. This calculation must exclude the value of your primary residence and may exclude any indebtedness secured by your primary residence (up to an amount equal to the value of your primary residence). In the case of fiduciary accounts, net worth and/or income suitability requirements may be satisfied by the beneficiary of the account or by the fiduciary, if the donor or grantor is the fiduciary and fiduciary directly or indirectly provides funds for the purchase of the Bonds.
 
 
25
 

Determination of Suitability
 
The Selling Group Members and registered investment advisors recommending the purchase of Bonds in this offering have the responsibility to make every reasonable effort to determine that your purchase of Bonds in this offering is a suitable and appropriate investment for you based on information provided by you regarding your financial situation and investment objectives. In making this determination, these persons have the responsibility to ascertain that you:
 
meet the minimum income and net worth standards set forth under “Plan of Distribution – Who May Invest” above;
 
can reasonably benefit from an investment in our Bonds based on your overall investment objectives and portfolio structure;
 
are able to bear the economic risk of the investment based on your overall financial situation;
 
are in a financial position appropriate to enable you to realize to a significant extent the benefits described in this offering circular of an investment in our Bonds; and
 
have apparent understanding of:
 
the fundamental risks of the investment;
 
the risk that you may lose your entire investment;
 
the lack of liquidity of our Bonds;
 
the restrictions on transferability of our Bonds; and
 
the tax consequences of your investment.
 
Relevant information for this purpose will include at least your age, investment objectives, investment experience, income, net worth, financial situation, and other investments as well as any other pertinent factors. The Selling Group Members and registered investment advisors recommending the purchase of Bonds in this offering must maintain, for a six-year period, records of the information used to determine that an investment in Bonds is suitable and appropriate for you.
 
The Offering
 
We are offering a maximum of $50,000,000 of Bonds to the public through our Managing Broker-Dealer at a price of $1,000.00 per Bond. As of the date of this Offering Circular, we have sold 19,548 Bonds, or $19,548,000, in the offering.
 
Our manager has arbitrarily determined the selling price of the Bonds and such price bears no relationship to our book or asset values, or to any other established criteria for valuing issued or outstanding Bonds.
 
The Bonds are being offered on a “best efforts” basis, which means generally that the Managing Broker-Dealer is required to use only its best efforts to sell the Bonds and it has no firm commitment or obligation to purchase any of the Bonds. The offering will continue until the Offering Termination. Our company will conduct closings in this offering at its discretion, the Closing Dates and each, a Closing Date, until the Offering Termination. On the Closing Dates, offering proceeds for that closing will be disbursed to our company and the respective Bonds will be issued to investors in the offering, or the Bondholders. The offering is being made on a best-efforts basis through JCC, our Managing Broker-Dealer.
 
 
26
 
 
Managing Broker-Dealer and Compensation We Will Pay for the Sale of Our Bonds
 
Our Managing Broker-Dealer will receive selling commissions of 5% of the gross offering proceeds. Our Managing Broker-Dealer also will receive a Managing Broker-Dealer Fee of up to 3% of the aggregate gross offering proceeds as compensation for acting as the Managing Broker-Dealer. Our Managing Broker-Dealer shall be entitled to retain, out of the Managing Broker-Dealer Fee, an amount equal to 0.57% of the gross proceeds of the offering. In addition, our Managing Broker-Dealer may reallow all or a portion of selling commissions to Selling Group Members. Additionally, we have agreed to pay up to $60,000, in due diligence expense reimbursements to our Managing Broker-Dealer, which it may reallow to participating broker-dealers. Total underwriting compensation to be received by or paid to participating FINRA member broker-dealers, including commissions, Managing Broker-Dealer Fee, and reimbursed due diligence expenses of broker-dealers will not exceed 8.12% of proceeds raised with the assistance of those participating FINRA member broker-dealers.
 
Set forth below is a table indicating the estimated compensation and expenses that will be paid in connection with the offering to our Managing Broker-Dealer.
 
 
 
Per
Bond
 
 
Total
Maximum
 
Offering:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Price to public
 $1,000.00 
 $50,000,000 
Less selling commissions
 $50.00 
 $2,500,000 
Less Managing Broker-Dealer Fee
 $30.00 
 $1,500,000 
Less Due Diligence Expense Reimbursements
 $1.20 
 $60,000 
Remaining Proceeds
 $918.80 
 $45,940,000 
 
We have agreed to indemnify our Managing Broker-Dealer, the Selling Group Members and selected registered investment advisors, against certain liabilities arising under the Securities Act. However, the SEC takes the position that indemnification against liabilities arising under the Securities Act is against public policy and is unenforceable.
 
Included within the compensation described above and not in addition to, our manager may pay certain costs associated with the sale and distribution of our Bonds, including salaries of wholesalers. We will not reimburse our manager for such payments. Nonetheless, such payments will be deemed to be “underwriting compensation” by FINRA. In accordance with the rules of FINRA, the table above sets forth the nature and estimated amount of all items that will be viewed as “underwriting compensation” by FINRA that are anticipated to be paid by us and our sponsor in connection with the offering. The amounts shown assume we sell all of the Bonds offered hereby and that all Bonds are sold in our offering through Selling Group Members, which is the distribution channel with the highest possible selling commissions and a Managing Broker-Dealer Fee.
 
It is illegal for us to pay or award any commissions or other compensation to any person engaged by you for investment advice as an inducement to such advisor to advise you to purchase any of our Bonds; however, nothing herein will prohibit a registered broker-dealer or other properly licensed person from earning a sales commission in connection with a sale of the Bonds.
 
Volume-Weighted Discount.
 
We are offering the volume-weighted Discount to the Price to Public of $1,000.00 described below. The Discount applicable to certain sales is specified in the table below.
 
Purchase Amount
 
Discount
 
 
Resulting Price Per Bond
 
20 – 29 Bonds
  3%
 $970 
30 – 39 Bonds
  4%
 $960 
40 or more Bonds
  5%
 $950 
 
All other terms of the offering and the Bonds, including the Price to Public of $1,000.00 shall remain the same. The Bonds shall continue to be denominated in $1,000.00 increments. Any Discounts applied will reduce net proceeds to the Company.
 
Discounts for Bonds Purchased by Certain Persons
 
We may pay reduced or no selling commissions and/or Managing Broker-Dealer Fees in connection with the sale of Bonds in this offering to:
 
 
registered principals or representatives of our dealer-manager or a participating broker (and immediate family members of any of the foregoing persons);
 
 
 
 
our employees, officers and directors or those of our manager, or the affiliates of any of the foregoing entities (and the immediate family members of any of the foregoing persons), any benefit plan established exclusively for the benefit of such persons or entities, and, if approved by our board of directors, joint venture partners, consultants and other service providers;
 
 
27
 
 
 
clients of an investment advisor registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or under applicable state securities laws (other than any registered investment advisor that is also registered as a broker-dealer, with the exception of clients who have “wrap” accounts which have asset based fees with such dually registered investment advisor/broker-dealer); or
 
 
 
 
persons investing in a bank trust account with respect to which the authority for investment decisions made has been delegated to the bank trust department.
 
For purposes of the foregoing, “immediate family members” means such person’s spouse, parents, children, brothers, sisters, grandparents, grandchildren and any such person who is so related by marriage such that this includes “step-” and “-in-law” relations as well as such persons so related by adoption. In addition, participating brokers contractually obligated to their clients for the payment of fees on terms inconsistent with the terms of acceptance of all or a portion of the selling commissions and/or Managing Broker-Dealer Fees may elect not to accept all or a portion of such compensation. In that event, such Bonds will be sold to the investor at a per Bond purchase price, net of all or a portion of selling commissions and/or Managing Broker-Dealer Fees. All sales must be made through a registered broker-dealer participating in this offering, and investment advisors must arrange for the placement of sales accordingly. The net proceeds to us will not be affected by reducing or eliminating selling commissions and/or Managing Broker-Dealer Fees payable in connection with sales to or through the persons described above. Purchasers purchasing net of some or all of the selling commissions and Managing Broker-Dealer Fees will receive Bonds in principal amount of $1,000 per Bond purchased.
 
Either through this offering or subsequently on any secondary market, affiliates of our company may buy bonds if and when they choose. There are no restrictions to these purchases. Affiliates that become Bondholders will have rights on parity with all other Bondholders.
 
How to Invest
 
Subscription Agreement
 
All investors will be required to complete and execute a subscription agreement in the form filed as an exhibit to the Offering Statement of which this Offering Circular is a part. The subscription agreement is available from your registered representative or financial adviser and should be delivered to GK Investment Holdings, LLC, c/o Great Lakes Fund Solutions at 500 Park Avenue, Suite 114, Lake Villa, Illinois 60046, together with payment in full by check or wire of your subscription purchase price in accordance with the instructions in the subscription agreement. We anticipate that we will hold closings for purchases of the Bonds on a semi-monthly or monthly basis.
 
Proceeds will be held with the escrow agent in an escrow account subject to compliance with Exchange Act Rule 15c2-4 until closing occurs. Our Managing Broker-Dealer and/or the Selling Group Members will submit a subscriber’s form(s) of payment in compliance with Exchange Act Rule 15c2-4, generally by noon of the next business day following receipt of the subscriber’s subscription agreement and form(s) of payment.
 
You will be required to represent and warrant in your subscription agreement that you are an accredited investor as defined under Rule 501 of Regulation D or that your investment in the Bonds does not exceed 10% of your net worth or annual income, whichever is greater, if you are a natural person, or 10% of your revenues or net assets, whichever is greater, calculated as of your most recent fiscal year if you are a non-natural person. By completing and executing your subscription agreement you will also acknowledge and represent that you have received a copy of this Offering Circular, you are purchasing the Bonds for your own account and that your rights and responsibilities regarding your Bonds will be governed by the indenture and the form of global bond certificate each filed as an exhibit to the Offering Statement of which this Offering Circular is a part.
 
 
28
 

Book-Entry, Delivery and Form
 
All Bonds are being issued to investors in book-entry only format and will be represented by global bond certificates, or certificates, deposited with a nominee holder. The nominee holders are: (i) the Depository Trust Company, or DTC, or its nominee Cede & Co. for purchasers purchasing through DTC participants; and (ii) Direct Transfer LLC, or Direct Transfer, for purchasers not purchasing through a DTC Participant.
 
We have gained eligibility for the Bonds to be issued and held through the book-entry systems and procedures of DTC and intend for all Bonds purchased through DTC participants to be held via DTC’s book-entry systems and to be represented by certificates registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC’s nominee). For investors not purchasing through a DTC participant, the certificates representing their Bonds will be registered in the name of, and held by Direct Transfer. We may, in our sole discretion, alter the nominee for Bonds sold without a DTC participant.
 
So long as nominees as described above are the registered owners of the certificates representing the Bonds, such nominees will be considered the sole owners and holders of the Bonds for all purposes of the Bonds and the Indenture. Owners of beneficial interests in the Bonds will not be entitled to have the certificates registered in their names, will not receive or be entitled to receive physical delivery of the Bonds in definitive form and will not be considered the owners or holders under the Indenture, including for purposes of receiving any reports delivered by us or the trustee pursuant to the Indenture. Accordingly, each person owning a beneficial interest in a Bond registered to DTC or its nominee must rely on either the procedures of DTC or its nominee on the one hand, and, if such entity is not a participant, on the procedures of the participant through which such person owns its interest, in order to exercise any rights of a Bondholder. Purchasers owning a beneficial interest in a Bond registered to Direct Transfer, or another nominee holder as selected by our company, will rely on the procedures of Direct Transfer or such nominee holder in order exercise its rights a Bondholder.
 
As a result:
 
 
you will not be entitled to receive a certificate representing your interest in the Bonds;
 
 
 
 
all references in this Offering Circular to actions by Bondholders will refer to actions taken by DTC upon instructions from its direct participants, or by Direct Transfer by Bondholders holding beneficial interests in the Bonds registered in its name; and
 
 
 
 
all references in this Offering Circular to payments and notices to Bondholders will refer either to (i) payments and notices to DTC or Cede & Co. for distribution to you in accordance with DTC procedures, or (ii) payments and notices to Direct Transfer or such other nominee holder for distribution to you in accordance with their applicable procedures.
 
The Depository Trust Company
 
We have obtained the information in this section concerning DTC and its book-entry systems and procedures from sources that we believe to be reliable. The description of the clearing system in this section reflects our understanding of the rules and procedures of DTC as they are currently in effect. DTC could change its rules and procedures at any time.
 
DTC will act as securities depositary for the Bonds registered in the name of its nominee, Cede & Co. DTC is:
 
 
a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law;
 
 
 
 
a “banking organization” under the New York Banking Law;
 
 
 
 
a member of the Federal Reserve System;
 
 
 
 
a “clearing corporation” under the New York Uniform Commercial Code; and
 
 
 
 
a “clearing agency” registered under the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act.
 
 
29
 
 
DTC holds securities that its direct participants deposit with DTC. DTC facilitates the settlement among direct participants of securities transactions, such as transfers and pledges, in deposited securities through electronic computerized book-entry changes in direct participants’ accounts, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of securities certificates.
 
Direct participants of DTC include securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations. DTC is owned by a number of its direct participants. Indirect participants of DTC, such as securities brokers and dealers, banks and trust companies, can also access the DTC system if they maintain a custodial relationship with a direct participant.
 
Purchases of Bonds under DTC’s system must be made by or through direct participants, which will receive a credit for the Bonds on DTC’s records. The ownership interest of each beneficial owner is in turn to be recorded on the records of direct participants and indirect participants. Beneficial owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase, but beneficial owners are expected to receive written confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the direct participants or indirect participants through which such beneficial owners entered into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the Bonds are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of participants acting on behalf of beneficial owners. Beneficial owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests in the Bonds.
 
Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to direct participants, by direct participants to indirect participants and by direct participants and indirect participants to beneficial owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.
 
Direct Transfer LLC
 
All Bonds not purchased through a DTC participant will be registered in the name of Direct Transfer. Direct Transfer is a Delaware corporation. Direct purchasers of Bonds registered through Direct Transfer will receive a credit for Bonds on Direct Transfer’s records. Beneficial owners registered through Direct Transfer will receive written confirmation from UMB Bank, our Bond registrar, upon closing of their purchases. Transfers of Bonds registered to Direct Transfer will be accomplished by entries made on the books of UMB Bank at the behest of Direct Transfer acting on behalf of its beneficial holders.
 
Book-Entry Format
 
Under the book-entry format, UMB Bank, as our paying agent, will pay interest or principal payments to Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, and to Direct Transfer. DTC will forward all payments it receives to the direct participants, who will then forward the payment to the indirect participants or to you as the beneficial owner. Direct Transfer will forward payments directly to beneficial owners of Bonds registered to Direct Transfer. You may experience some delay in receiving your payments under this system. Neither we, the trustee, nor any paying agent or sub-paying agent has any direct responsibility or liability for the payment of principal or interest on the Bonds to owners of beneficial interests in the certificates.
 
DTC is required to make book-entry transfers on behalf of its direct participants and is required to receive and transmit payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds. Any direct participant or indirect participant with which you have an account is similarly required to make book-entry transfers and to receive and transmit payments with respect to the notes on your behalf. We and the trustee under the Indenture have no responsibility for any aspect of the actions of DTC or any of its direct or indirect participants or of Direct Transfer or Great Lakes. In addition, we and the trustee under the Indenture have no responsibility or liability for any aspect of the records kept by DTC or any of its direct or indirect participants or Direct Transfer or Great Lakes relating to or payments made on account of beneficial ownership interests in the Bonds or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to such beneficial ownership interests. We also do not supervise these systems in any way.
 
 
30
 
 
The trustee will not recognize you as a Bondholder under the Indenture, and you can only exercise the rights of a Bondholder indirectly through DTC and its direct participants or through Direct Transfer, as applicable. DTC has advised us that it will only take action regarding a Bond if one or more of the direct participants to whom the Bond is credited directs DTC to take such action and only in respect of the portion of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds as to which that participant or participants has or have given that direction. DTC can only act on behalf of its direct participants. Your ability to pledge Bonds, and to take other actions, may be limited because you will not possess a physical certificate that represents your Bonds.
 
If the global bond certificate representing your Bonds is held by DTC, conveyance of notices and other communications by the trustee to the beneficial owners, and vice versa, will occur via DTC. The trustee will communicate directly with DTC. DTC will then communicate to direct participants. The direct participants will communicate with the indirect participants, if any. Then, direct participants and indirect participants will communicate to beneficial owners. Such communications will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.
 
If the global bond certificate representing your Bonds is held by Direct Transfer, conveyance of notices and other communications by the trustee to the beneficial owners, and vice versa, will occur via Direct Transfer. The trustee will communicate directly with Direct Transfer, which will communicate directly or through Great Lakes Fund Solutions, who may be designated by Direct Transfer to handle investor communications on its behalf, with the beneficial owners.
 
The Trustee
 
UMB Bank has agreed to be the trustee under the Indenture. The Indenture contains certain limitations on the rights of the trustee, should it become one of our creditors, to obtain payment of claims in certain cases, or to realize on certain property received in respect of any claim as security or otherwise. The trustee will be permitted to engage in other transactions with us and our affiliates.
 
The Indenture provides that in case an Event of Default (as defined herein) specified in the Indenture shall occur and not be cured, the trustee will be required, in the exercise of its power, to use the degree of care of a reasonable person in the conduct of his own affairs. Subject to such provisions, the trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers under the Indenture at the request of any Bondholder, unless the Bondholder has offered to the trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to it against any loss, liability or expense.
 
Resignation or Removal of the Trustee.
 
The trustee may resign at any time, or may be removed by the holders of a majority of the principal amount of then-outstanding Bonds. In addition, upon the occurrence of contingencies relating generally to the insolvency of the trustee, we may remove the trustee or a court of competent jurisdiction may remove the trustee upon petition of a holder of certificates. However, no resignation or removal of the trustee may become effective until a successor trustee has been appointed.
 
We are offering the Bonds pursuant to an exemption to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, or the Trust Indenture Act. As a result, investors in our Bonds will not be afforded the benefits and protections of the Trust Indenture Act. However, in certain circumstances, our Indenture makes reference to the substantive provisions of the Trust Indenture Act.
 
Registrar and Paying Agent
 
We have designated UMB Bank as paying agent for the Bonds and Direct Transfer as sub-paying agent in respect of Bonds registered to it. UMB Bank will also act as registrar for the Bonds. The Bonds will be issued in book-entry form only, evidenced by global certificates, as such, payments will be made to DTC, its nominee or to Direct Transfer.

 
 
31
 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
General
 
We are focused on acquiring income producing commercial rental properties for the purpose of holding and operating the acquired properties, and if the need arises, to redevelop the rental properties for an alternative use other than the intended use at the time of acquisition. We expect that most of the acquired assets will be held through wholly- owned or majority-owned subsidies and the assets will be acquired by assuming either existing financing secured by the asset or by borrowing new funds.
 
We filed an offering statement on Form 1-A with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on December 23, 2015, which offering statement was qualified by the SEC on September 30, 2016. Pursuant to the offering statement, we are offering up to a maximum of $50,000,000 of 7% unsecured bonds, or the Bonds. The purchase price per Bond is $1,000, with a minimum purchase amount of $5,000. Assuming that the maximum amount of Bonds purchased and issued, we anticipate that the net proceeds will be $44,650,000 and will be used to pay down existing indebtedness and acquire rental properties in our target asset class. As of June 30, 2018, we had sold $11,948,000 of Bonds.
  
We are managed by GK Development, Inc., or GK Development, a real estate acquisition, development and management company located in Barrington, Illinois, formed in 1994. We benefit from GK Development’s real estate operating and leasing skills, including releasing, redeveloping, renovating, refinancing, repositioning and selling.
 
Lake Mead Crossing
 
On November 12, 2015, we acquired, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, a commercial rental property located in Henderson, Nevada, known as Lake Mead Crossing, for a total purchase price of $42,065,000, excluding prorations. Upon acquisition, Lake Mead Crossing consisted of multiple buildings aggregating approximately 221,200 square feet of rentable commercial space. Lake Mead Crossing is part of a larger shopping center shadow anchored by a Target consisting of approximately 152,000 square feet. Lake Mead Crossing is owned by two of our subsidiaries, Lake Mead Partners, LLC, or LM Partners, and Lake Mead Development, LLC, or LM Development. Lake Mead Parent, LLC, or LM Parent, which is our wholly-owned subsidiary, is the sole member of LM Partners. Upon acquisition, LM Partners owned a portion of Lake Mead Crossing, consisting of approximately 155,100 square feet of rentable commercial space. Upon acquisition, LM Development, owned the other portion of Lake Mead Crossing consisting of approximately 66,000 square feet of rentable commercial space.
 
Lake Mead Crossing was purchased with the use of mortgage debt and mezzanine debt. LM Partners received mortgage debt of $29,500,000 from Nevada State Bank, and LM Development received mortgage debt of $2,700,000 from Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A., or Barrington Bank. In addition to the mortgage financing, LM Partners and LM Development entered into mezzanine loan agreements with GK Development and GK Secured Income IV, LLC or GKSI IV, an affiliate of GK Development. The mezzanine loan agreement with GKSI IV is in the maximum amount of $10,500,000 at 8% interest, allocated between LM Partners and LM Development, of which $6,417,483 was outstanding as of June 30, 2018. The mezzanine loan agreement with GK Development is in the maximum amount of $2,608,100, or the GK Development Loan, allocated between LM Partners and LM Development, all of which was repaid as of December 31, 2017. For more details on the terms of the financing, please see “Item 3. Financial Statements” herein and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the Offering Statement.
  
After the acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing, the Company, through LM Partners, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Pacific Dental Services, LLC, or PDCS, a former tenant in Lake Mead Crossing, whereby LM Partners agreed to sell to PDCS the building partially occupied by PDCS, containing approximately 7,800 rentable square feet, for $4,000,000, excluding prorations. The sale closed on March 20, 2017 and $2,700,000 of the sale proceeds was used to reduce the outstanding principal balance on the Nevada State Bank note payable and $980,000 of the sales proceeds was used to reduce the outstanding principal balance on the GK Development Loan.
 
As of June 30, 2018, the portion of Lake Mead Crossing owned by LM Partners is 97.2% leased and the portion of Lake Mead Crossing owned by LM Development is 52.5% leased.

 
32
 
 
2700 Ygnacio
 
On January 30, 2017, our Company, through 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Company, or Ygnacio Partners, acquired an office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California, or 2700 Ygnacio, from an unaffiliated seller for $14,905,290, excluding prorations. 2700 Ygnacio is a three-story, Class A office building with approximately 108,000 rentable square feet.
 
As of June 30, 2018, 2700 Ygnacio is 77.0% leased to numerous tenants and the leases are expiring on various dates between 2018 and 2022. Corrollo Engineers is the anchor tenant on the property, occupying 37,156 rentable square feet, or 34.41% of the property, under a lease currently scheduled to expire on October 31, 2019.
 
The purchase of 2700 Ygnacio was financed using (i) a first mortgage loan in the amount of $11,325,000 from Mutual of Omaha Bank, all of which was funded upon acquisition, (ii) an interim loan from GK Development of $2,305,000, or the GK Development Loan II, and (iii) proceeds from this offering of $1,750,000. For more details on the terms of the financing, please see “Item 3. Financial Statements” herein and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the Offering Statement.
 
We used Bond proceeds to repay the GK Development Loan II in 2017.
 
Financial Summary
 
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, GK Investment Holdings, Inc $2,960,627, consolidated net income before depreciation, amortization and gain on sale of rental property of $395,247 and consolidated net income of $467,999.
 
In the most recent six-month period ending June 30, 2018, we had revenue of $2,905,125, consolidated net income before depreciation, and consolidated net loss of $1,093,358.
 
Results of Operation
 
We operate on a calendar year. Set forth below is a discussion of our operating results for the first half of 2018, from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018.
 
As of June 30, 2018, we had the following two assets, (i) a commercial rental property located in Henderson, Nevada, known as Lake Mead Crossing, which consists of multiple buildings aggregating approximately 213,400 square feet of rentable commercial space, taking into account the sale of a portion of Lake Mead Crossing to PDCS, and (ii) a Class A office building located in Walnut Creek, California consisting of approximately 108,000 square feet of rentable commercial space. Lake Mead Crossing was acquired on November 12, 2015 and GK Development assumed management responsibilities on May 1, 2016. 2700 Ygnacio was acquired on January 30, 2017 and GK Development assumed management responsibilities on the acquisition date.
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2018, our total revenues from operations amounted to $2,905,125. Operating costs for the same period, including depreciation and amortization of $1,441,872 but excluding interest expense of $1,658,484, amounted to $2,346,715. This resulted in operating income of $558,410. Net loss for the same period amounted to $1,093,358 after taking into account interest expense of $1,658,484, and miscellaneous income of $6,520.
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, our total revenues from operations amounted to $2,960,627. Operating costs for the same period, including depreciation and amortization of $1,666,130 but excluding interest expense of $1,615,817, amounted to $2,619,009. This resulted in operating income of $341,618. Net gain for the same period amounted to $126,381 after taking into account interest expense of $2,381,086 and miscellaneous income of $3,305.
 
We are working diligently to identify assets in our target asset class and to acquire such assets in the timeframe that is customary in the real estate industry.
 

 
33
 
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Our principal demands for cash are for acquisition costs, including the purchase price of any additional properties, loans and securities we acquire, improvement costs, the payment of our operating and administrative expenses, and all continuing debt service obligations, including our Bond Service Obligations. Generally, we will fund additional acquisitions from the net proceeds of this offering. We intend to acquire additional assets with cash and mortgage or other debt, but we also may acquire assets free and clear of permanent mortgage or other indebtedness by paying the entire purchase price for the asset in cash. As we are dependent on capital raised in this offering to conduct our business, our investment activity over the next twelve (12) months will be dictated by the capital raised in this offering. We expect to acquire additional properties and meet our business objectives regardless of the amount of capital raised in this offering. If the capital raised in this offering is insufficient to purchase additional properties solely with conventional mortgage debt, we will implement a strategy of utilizing a mix of capital, mortgage debt and mezzanine debt (similar to the Lake Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio acquisitions) to acquire properties. Further, our company expects that it will be able to meet its cash requirements regardless of the amount of capital raised by drawing upon the Cash Flow Loans and the cash flows of properties we own.
 
We expect to use debt financing as a source of capital. We have no limits on the amount of leverage we may employ; however, senior property debt is generally expected to be approximately 65% of the cost of our investments. See “Investment Policies” for more information.
 
We anticipate that adequate cash will continue to be generated from operations to fund our operating and administrative expenses, and all continuing debt service obligations, including the Bond Service Obligations. However, our ability to finance our operations is subject to some uncertainties. Our ability to generate working capital is dependent on our ability to attract and retain tenants and the economic and business environments of the various markets in which our properties are located. Our ability to sell our assets is partially dependent upon the state of real estate markets and the ability of purchasers to obtain financing at reasonable commercial rates. In general, we intend to pay debt service from cash flow from operations. If cash flow from operations is insufficient then our Cash Flow Lenders are obligated to make the Cash Flow Loans to us. If we have not generated sufficient cash flow from our operations and other sources, such as from borrowings, including the Cash Flow Loans, we may use funds out of the Debt Service Reserve. Moreover, our manager may change this policy, in its sole discretion, at any time. See “Description of Company’s Securities - Certain Covenants” in this Offering Circular for more information.
 
Potential future sources of capital include secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, establishing additional lines of credit, proceeds from the sale of properties and undistributed cash flow. Note that, currently, we have not identified any additional source of financing, other than the proceeds of this offering, and there is no assurance that such sources of financing will be available on favorable terms or at all.
 
As of June 30, 2018, we had cash on hand of $1,569,096 and restricted cash (funded reserves) of $687,829. The funded reserves are required as a condition precedent of the mortgage loans payable and the Indenture related to the Bonds, which requires 7% of the gross proceeds from the offering of our Bonds be placed into a reserve account held by the Bond trustee until October 17, 2017. We are currently offering investors the opportunity to purchase up to a maximum of $50,000,000 of Bonds. of which, $11,948,000 were sold as of June 30, 2018. We anticipate that the total net proceeds of the offering, if successful, and assuming we sell the remaining Bonds at the Price to the Public, will amount to $44,650,000, which will enable us to pursue acquisitions of commercial real estate assets in our target asset class and thereby increase cash flows.
 
The Company is offering $50,000,000 of the Bonds at a purchase price of $1,000 per Bond, subject to the volume-weighted discount. The Bonds, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 7% per annum, will mature on September 30, 2022. As of June 30, 2018, $11,948,000 of Bonds have been sold and through September 26, 2018, $19,458,000 have been sold. The proceeds from the offering received to date have been used for the acquisition of 2700 Ygnacio, and it is our intention to use future proceeds to repay a portion of existing mezzanine debt and other existing indebtedness and acquire additional commercial rental properties in our target asset class.
 
 
34
 
 
GENERAL INFORMATION AS TO OUR COMPANY
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company formed on September 14, 2015 that invests in and operates commercial rental properties, leases such properties to multiple tenants, and makes such other real estate related investments as are consistent with its investment objectives and that GK Development, Inc., GK Development, our manager, deems appropriate. Our company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, owns and operates one such property, Lake Mead Crossing. The office of our company and GK Development are located at 257 East Main Street, Suite 200, Barrington, IL 60010, and the telephone number is (847) 277-9930.
 
GK Development is an Illinois corporation. GK Development is responsible for managing our company’s affairs and for identifying and making acquisitions and dispositions on our company’s behalf. GK Development is a commercial real estate acquisition and development company specializing in the acquisition, management and redevelopment of commercial rental properties such as regional malls and neighborhood shopping centers. GK Development controls a portfolio of real estate assets currently valued at over $500,000,000, the majority of which are commercial rental properties.
 
GK Development’s management team is comprised of operation managers who are responsible for the day-to-day operation of GK Development and our company. See “Directors and Executive Officers” for more information on the management team of GK Development and our company.
 
Operating Agreement
 
Formation and Purpose
 
Our company was formed on September 14, 2015. Our company is governed by its operating agreement, dated as of September 14, 2015 and entered into under the laws of the State of Delaware, or the Operating Agreement. Under the Operating Agreement, our company was formed with the intent to acquire, own, redevelop, and operate commercial real estate. Notwithstanding the intended purposes of our company, pursuant to the Operating Agreement, our company is permitted to transact any lawful business not required to be stated specifically in the Operating Agreement and for which limited liability companies may be formed under the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (Title 6, Subtitle II, Chapter 18), as amended from time to time. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to this Offering and Our Corporate Structure” for more information.
 
Management
 
The management of our company is entrusted solely to GK Development for as long as it remains the sole manager of our company. Only the members of our company have the right to remove our manager, and only if our manager has made a decision to file a voluntary petition or otherwise initiate proceedings to have it adjudicated insolvent, or to seek an order for relief as debtor under the United States Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.); to file any petition seeking any composition, reorganization, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under the present or any future federal bankruptcy laws or any other present or future applicable federal, state or other statute or law relative to bankruptcy, insolvency, or other relief for debtors; to seek the appointment of any trustee, receiver, conservator, assignee, sequestrator, custodian, liquidator (or other similar official) of our company or of all or any substantial part of the assets of our company, to make any general assignment for the benefit of creditors of our company, to admit in writing the inability of our company to pay its debts generally as they become due, or to declare or effect a moratorium on our company’s debt or to take any action in furtherance of any of the above proscribed actions. Bondholders will have no rights in the management of our company.
 
Under the Operating Agreement, certain powers are reserved for our manager. The approval of our manager is required for the following actions with respect to our company:
 
 
 
Amendment of the Certificate of Formation or the Operating Agreement;
 
 
 
 
The conversion of our company to another type of entity organized within or without the state of Delaware, including without limitation, a limited partnership;
 
 
35
 
 
 
Merger, equity interest exchange, business combination or consolidation with any other entity, excepting a wholly-owned subsidiary;
 
 
 
 
Creating or authorizing any new class or series of units or equity, or selling, issuing or granting additional units;
 
 
 
 
A decision to file a voluntary petition or otherwise initiate proceedings to have our company adjudicated insolvent, or seeking an order for relief of our company as debtor under the United States Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.); to file any petition seeking any composition, reorganization, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under the present or any future federal bankruptcy laws or any other present or future applicable federal, state or other statute or law relative to bankruptcy, insolvency, or other relief for debtors with respect to our company; or to seek the appointment of any trustee, receiver, conservator, assignee, sequestrator, custodian, liquidator (or other similar official) of our company or of all or any substantial part of the assets of our company, or to make any general assignment for the benefit of creditors of our company, or to admit in writing the inability of our company to pay its debts generally as they become due, or to declare or effect a moratorium on our company’s debt or to take any action in furtherance of any of the above proscribed actions;
 
 
 
 
Any decision to dissolve or liquidate our company, except as specifically set forth in the Operating Agreement;
 
 
 
 
Approving any budget or strategic or business plan for our company or any of its affiliates;
 
 
 
 
Except with respect to an affiliate of our company, making any investment in any entity;
 
 
 
 
Encumbering all of the assets of our company or any affiliate of our company; and
 
 
 
 
Making any distributions of Company cash or other property except as specifically provided in the Operating Agreement.
 
Membership
 
Our company has one class of units, Class A Units. Mr. Garo Kholamian owns a 10.209% Membership Interest, individually, and he controls an additional 57.60% through certain members that he controls. As a result, Mr. Garo Kholamian has a beneficial Membership Interest of 67.81%. Mrs. Nancy Kholamian owns a 6.21% Membership Interest, and she controls an additional 6.40% through a certain member that she controls. As a result, Mrs. Nancy Kholamian has a beneficial Membership Interest of 12.61%.
 
Membership provides certain protections and rights to the members. Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, upon approval by GK Development and recommendation to the members, a majority of the members, either present and voting at a meeting duly called and held or acting by written consent shall be required to approve the following actions with respect to our company:
 
 
Amendment of the Certificate of Formation or, subject to Section 10.13, the Operating Agreement;
 
 
 
 
Merger, equity interest exchange, business combination or consolidation with any other Person, except a wholly-owned subsidiary, in which our company is not the surviving entity;
 
 
 
 
A Terminating Capital Transaction;
 
 
 
 
A decision to file a voluntary petition or otherwise initiate proceedings to have our company adjudicated insolvent, or seeking an order for relief of our company as debtor under the United States Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.); to file any petition seeking any composition, reorganization, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under the present or any future federal bankruptcy laws or any other present or future applicable federal, state or other statute or law relative to bankruptcy, insolvency, or other relief for debtors with respect to our company; or to seek the appointment of any trustee, receiver, conservator, assignee, sequestrator, custodian, liquidator (or other similar official) of our company or of all or any substantial part of the assets of our company, or to make any general assignment for the benefit of creditors of our company, or to admit in writing the inability of our company to pay its debts generally as they become due, or to declare or effect a moratorium on our company’s debt or to take any action in furtherance of any of the above proscribed actions; or
 
 
 
 
Any decision to dissolve or liquidate our company, except as specifically set forth in this Agreement.
 
Indemnification
 
Our Operating Agreement limits the liability of our manager, GK Development and certain other persons or entities. See “Limitations on Liability” in this Offering Circular for more information.
 
 
36
 
 
 POLICY WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES
 
Issuance of Additional Securities
 
Except for those actions specifically discussed in this Offering Circular, the issuing of the Bonds will not impose any restrictions on the ability of our company to issue additional bonds, debt, preferred equity or other security. The Bonds will be our direct, senior unsecured obligations and will:
 
 
rank equally with each other and with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness outstanding from time to time;
 
 
 
 
rank senior to all of our future indebtedness that by its terms is expressly subordinate to the Bonds;
 
 
effectively rank junior to any of our future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and
 
 
 
 
effectively be structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations of each of our subsidiaries, including the claims of mortgage lenders holding secured indebtedness, as to the specific property receiving each lender’s mortgage and other secured indebtedness.
 
See “Description of Bonds - Certain Covenants” for more information.
 
Reports
 
We will furnish the following reports to each Bondholders:
 
Reporting Requirements under Tier II of Regulation A. We are required to comply with certain ongoing disclosure requirements under Rule 257 of Regulation A. We are required to file: an annual report with the SEC on Form 1-K; a semi-annual report with the SEC on Form 1-SA; current reports with the SEC on Form 1-U; and a notice under cover of Form 1-Z. The necessity to file current reports is triggered by certain corporate events, similar to the ongoing reporting obligation faced by issuers under the Exchange Act, however the requirement to file a Form 1-U is expected to be triggered by significantly fewer corporate events than that of the Form 8-K. Parts I & II of Form 1-Z will be filed by us if and when we decide to and are no longer obligated to file and provide annual reports pursuant to the requirements of Regulation A.
 
Annual Reports. As soon as practicable, but in no event later than one hundred twenty (120) days after the close of our fiscal year, ending December 31st, our manager will cause to be mailed or made available, by any reasonable means, to each Bondholder as of a date selected by our manager, an annual report containing financial statements of our company for such fiscal year, presented in accordance with GAAP, including a balance sheet and statements of operations, Company equity and cash flows, with such statements having been audited by an accountant selected by our manager. Our manager shall be deemed to have made a report available to each Bondholder as required if it has either (i) filed such report with the SEC via its Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) system and such report is publicly available on such system or (ii) made such report available on any website maintained by our company and available for viewing by the Bondholders.
 
 
37
 
 
INVESTMENT POLICIES OF OUR COMPANY
 
Investment Strategy
 
Our company focuses on investments in existing, income-producing, commercial rental real estate that will benefit from GK Development’s real estate operating and leasing skills, including releasing, redevelopment, renovation, refinancing, repositioning and sale. Our company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, currently owns and operates Lake Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio. GK Development intends to actively participate in the management of our company’s properties, rather than holding the properties as passive investments. The objective of this strategy is to maximize cash flow and property value at the time of final disposition. By doing this, GK Development maximizes the potential of our company to pay its obligations under the Bonds as they become due. Holding periods for our company’s investments will vary depending on a number of factors.
 
Our company’s investment strategy is focused primarily on rental-based commercial real estate that has current income. Targeted property types include but are not limited to established regional malls, neighborhood shopping centers, power centers, grocery-anchored centers, lifestyle centers, office buildings, multi-family and other commercial properties. The selection of solid investment opportunities is based, in part, upon the properties’ potential for enhancement in cash flows and market value.
 
Our company has acquired, and plans to acquire, properties on a leveraged basis, operate them in a manner to maximize their value (including execution of any of the aforementioned strategies), and then sell or refinance them to realize a return.
 
Our company generally will purchase individual properties, but in some cases, it may consider the purchase of a portfolio of properties. Neither the Operating Agreement nor the Indenture limits the amount our company may invest in a single property; however, GK Development intends to diversify our company’s real estate investments.
 
Our company does not intend to act as a land developer in that it is has no intent to invest in, acquire, own, hold, lease, operate, manage, maintain, redevelop, sell or otherwise use undeveloped real property or “raw land,” as a ground up development. Our company, engaging in its commercial real estate activities, may have the opportunity to acquire commercial real property which includes unimproved pad sites for future development and lease-up opportunities. In such instances, our company will retain the unimproved pad sites for ground lease, build-to-suit and/or sell opportunities. In situations where our company has the opportunity to acquire commercial real property which includes a large tract of developable raw land, the developable raw land will not be acquired by our company, but by an entity affiliated with GK Development. Our company may choose to redevelop real property for an alternative use than intended when originally acquired or developed.
 
Other than Lake Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio, our company does not own any properties, nor has it identified any properties which are probable for acquisition, as of the date of this Offering Circular.
 
Dispositions
 
We may from time to time dispose of properties if, based upon management’s periodic review of our portfolio, our manager determines such action would be in our best interest. In addition, we may elect to enter into joint ventures or other types of co-ownership with respect to properties that we already own, either in connection with acquiring interests in other properties or from investors to raise equity capital.
 
Leverage of Properties
 
Our company borrows money to acquire its properties when GK Development determines that it is advantageous to our company. By operating on a leveraged basis, our company expects that it will have more funds available for investment in properties and other investments. This will allow our company to make more investment than would otherwise be possible, resulting in a more diversified portfolio. Although our company expects its liability for the repayment of indebtedness to be limited to the value of the specific property securing the liability and the rents or profits derived therefrom, our company’s use of leverage increases the risk of default on the mortgage payments and a resulting foreclosure of a particular property. See “Risk Factors” for more information.
 
 
38
 
 
Our company may borrow any amount necessary to enable our company to invest the proceeds of this offering in properties. Our company intends to borrow up to the maximum amount available from its lenders, thus increasing the number of properties that our company can acquire as well as enhancing the yield to our company. GK Development’s experience with prior real estate programs with similar commercial rental properties has been that lender’s preferences will be to make loans with an approximately 60-70% loan-to-value ratio in respect to the properties in the class targeted by our company. Therefore, our company believes that its aggregate loan-to-value on its portfolio will be approximately 65%.
 
Currently, Lake Mead Crossing has been assessed an aggregate value of approximately $47,400,000. The $42,065,000 purchase price of Lake Mead Crossing was funded by: (i) mortgage loans aggregating $32,200,000; (ii) a mezzanine loan of $8,530,000 and (iii) interim loans aggregating $1,335,000. Although current loan-to-value ratio of Lake Mead Crossing is approximately 80.8%, using the current outstanding balances for all loans. Our company plans to use proceeds from this offering to repay the mezzanine and interim loans. If our company repays these loans in their entirety, the loan-to-value ratio for Lake Mead Crossing will be reduced to 59.9%. With respect to the Lake Mead Crossing acquisition, management determined the fair value of the total identifiable net assets with the assistance of a third party appraiser using the income approach methodology of valuation. The income approach methodology utilizes the remaining non-cancelable lease terms as defined in lease agreements, market rental data, and discount rates. Key assumptions used includes a capitalization rate of 7.5%, growth rates for market rentals of 3.0%, and a discount rate of 9.0%. The fair value is allocated to the acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and improvements), and acquired intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above-market and below-market leases, leasing commissions and acquired in-place leases).
 
2700 Ygnacio has been assessed an aggregate value of approximately $18,000,000. The $14,905,200 purchase price of 2700 Ygnacio was funded by: (i) a mortgage loan of $11,325,000; (ii) an interim loan of $2,305,000 and (iii) equity from this offering aggregating $1,750,000. The current loan-to-value ratio for 2700 Ygnacio is approximately 67.2%, using the current outstanding balances for all loans. With respect to the 2700 Ygnacio acquisition, management determined the fair value of the total identifiable net assets with the assistance of a third party appraiser using the income approach methodology of valuation. The income approach methodology utilizes the remaining non-cancelable lease terms as defined in lease agreements, market rental data, and discount rates. Key assumptions used includes a capitalization rate of 7.5%, growth rates for market rentals of 3.0%, and a discount rate of 8.75%. The fair value is allocated to the acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and improvements), and acquired intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above-market and below-market leases, leasing commissions and acquired in-place leases).
 
GK Development may choose to refinance our company’s properties during the term of a loan. The benefits of refinancing may include an increased cash flow resulting from reduced debt service requirements, thus an increase in cash available for payments under the Bonds, and an increase in property ownership if refinancing proceeds are reinvested in real estate.
 
Investments in Real Estate Mortgages
 
Our business objectives emphasize equity investments in commercial rental property. Although we do not presently intend to invest in mortgages or deeds of trust, other than in a manner that is ancillary to an equity investment, we may elect, in our discretion, to invest in mortgages and other types of real estate interests, including, without limitation, participating or convertible mortgages. Investments in real estate mortgages run the risk that one or more borrowers may default under certain mortgages and that the collateral securing certain mortgages may not be sufficient to enable us to recoup our full investment.
 
Investment in Other Securities
 
Other than as described above, we do not intend to acquire any additional securities such as bonds, preferred stocks or common stock, for investment purposes. From time to time, we may elect to acquire properties through co-investment or joint venture structures. In such an instance, we intend to structure such investments so that we maintain control of the property-owning subsidiary.
 
 
39
 
 
Investment Company Act Considerations
 
We intend to conduct our operations so that our company and our subsidiaries are each exempt from registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Under the Investment Company Act, in relevant part, a company is an “investment company” if:
 
 
pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(A), it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; and
 
 
 
 
pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(C), it is engaged, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets on an unconsolidated basis. “Investment securities” does not include U.S. Government securities and securities of majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.
 
We intend to conduct our operations so that our company and most, if not all, of its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries own or proposes to acquire “investment securities” having a value of not more than 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. We will continuously monitor our holdings on an ongoing basis to determine the compliance of our company and each wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiary with this test. We expect that most, if not all, of our company’s wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries will not be relying on exemptions under either Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. Consequently, interests in these subsidiaries (which are expected to constitute most, if not all, of our assets) generally will not constitute “investment securities.” We believe that our company and most, if not all, of its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries will not be considered investment companies under Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act.
 
In addition, we believe that neither our company nor any of its wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries will be considered investment companies under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act because they will not engage primarily or hold themselves out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Rather, our company and its subsidiaries will be primarily engaged in non-investment company businesses related to real estate. Consequently, our company and its subsidiaries expect to be able to conduct their respective operations such that none of them will be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
 
We will classify our assets for purposes of the Investment Company Act, including our 3(c)(5)(C) exclusion, in large measure upon no-action positions taken by the SEC staff in the past. These no-action positions were issued in accordance with factual situations that may be substantially different from the factual situations we may face, and a number of these no-action positions were issued more than ten years ago. No assurance can be given that the SEC staff will concur with our classification of our assets. In addition, the SEC staff may, in the future, issue further guidance that may require us to re-classify our assets for purposes of the Investment Company Act. If we are required to re-classify our assets, we may no longer be in compliance with the exclusion from the definition of an investment company provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act.
 
For purposes of determining whether we satisfy the 55%/80% tests, we will classify the assets in which we invest as follows:
 
 
Real Property. Based on the no-action letters issued by the SEC staff, we will classify our fee interests in real properties as qualifying assets. In addition, based on no-action letters issued by the SEC staff, we will treat our investments in joint ventures, which in turn invest in qualifying assets such as real property, as qualifying assets only if we have the right to approve major decisions affecting the joint venture; otherwise, such investments will be classified as real estate-related assets. We expect that no less than 55% of our assets will consist of investments in real property, including any joint ventures that we control.
 
 
40
 
 
 
Securities. We intend to treat as real estate-related assets debt and equity securities of both non-majority owned publicly traded and private companies primarily engaged in real estate businesses, including REITs and other real estate operating companies, and securities issued by pass-through entities of which substantially all of the assets consist of qualifying assets or real estate-related assets.
 
 
 
 
Loans. Based on the no-action letters issued by the SEC staff, we will classify our investments in various types of whole loans as qualifying assets, as long as the loans are “fully secured” by an interest in real estate at the time we originate or acquire the loan. However, we will consider loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 100% to be real estate-related assets. We will treat our mezzanine loan investments as qualifying assets so long as they are structured as “Tier 1” mezzanine loans in accordance with the guidance published by the SEC staff in a no-action letter that discusses the classifications of Tier 1 mezzanine loans under Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act.
 
We will classify our investments in construction loans as qualifying assets, as long as the loans are “fully secured” by an interest in real estate at the time we originate or acquire the loan. With respect to construction loans that are funded over time, we will consider the outstanding balance (i.e., the amount of the loan actually drawn) as a qualifying asset. The SEC staff has not issued no-action letters specifically addressing construction loans. If the SEC staff takes a position in the future that is contrary to our classification, we will modify our classification accordingly.
 
Consistent with no-action positions taken by the SEC staff, we will consider any participation in a whole mortgage loan, including B-Notes, to be a qualifying real estate asset only if: (1) we have a participation interest in a mortgage loan that is fully secured by real property; (2) we have the right to receive our proportionate share of the interest and the principal payments made on the loan by the borrower, and our returns on the loan are based on such payments; (3) we invest only after performing the same type of due diligence and credit underwriting procedures that we would perform if we were underwriting the underlying mortgage loan; (4) we have approval rights in connection with any material decisions pertaining to the administration and servicing of the loan and with respect to any material modification to the loan agreements; and (5) if the loan becomes non-performing, we have effective control over the remedies relating to the enforcement of the mortgage loan, including ultimate control of the foreclosure process, by having the right to: (a) appoint the special servicer to manage the resolution of the loan; (b) advise, direct or approve the actions of the special servicer; (c) terminate the special servicer at any time with or without cause; (d) cure the default so that the mortgage loan is no longer non-performing; and (e) purchase the senior loan at par plus accrued interest, thereby acquiring the entire mortgage loan.
 
We will base our treatment of any other investments as qualifying assets and real estate-related assets on the characteristics of the underlying collateral and the particular type of loan (including whether we have foreclosure rights with respect to those securities or loans that have underlying real estate collateral) and we will make these determinations in a manner consistent with guidance issued by the SEC staff.
 
Qualification for exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act will limit our ability to make certain investments. For example, these restrictions may limit the ability of our company and its subsidiaries to invest directly in mortgage-related securities that represent less than the entire ownership in a pool of mortgage loans, debt and equity tranches of securitizations and certain asset-backed securities and real estate companies or in assets not related to real estate. Although we intend to monitor our portfolio, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain this exemption from registration for our company or each of our subsidiaries. 
 
A change in the value of any of our assets could negatively affect our ability to maintain our exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act. To maintain compliance with the Section 3(c)(5)(C) exclusion, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may have to acquire additional assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forego opportunities to acquire assets that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy.
 
To the extent that the SEC staff provides more specific guidance regarding any of the matters bearing upon the definition of investment company and the exceptions to that definition, we may be required to adjust our investment strategy accordingly. Additional guidance from the SEC staff could provide additional flexibility to us, or it could further inhibit our ability to pursue the investment strategy we have chosen.
 
If we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use borrowings), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act), and portfolio composition, including restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration and other matters. Compliance with the Investment Company Act would, accordingly, limit our ability to make certain investments and require us to significantly restructure our business plan.
 
 
41
 
 
DESCRIPTION OF REAL ESTATE
 
We currently own two properties, Lake Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio.
 
Lake Mead Crossing
 
On November 12, 2015, we acquired, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, a commercial rental property located in Henderson, Nevada, known as Lake Mead Crossing, for a total purchase price of $42,065,000, excluding prorations. Upon acquisition, Lake Mead Crossing, which was our sole asset as of December 31, 2016, consisted of multiple buildings aggregating approximately 221,200 square feet of rentable commercial space. Lake Mead Crossing is part of a larger shopping center shadow anchored by a Target consisting of approximately 152,000 square feet. Lake Mead Crossing is owned by two of our subsidiaries, Lake Mead Partners, LLC, or LM Partners, and Lake Mead Development, LLC, or LM Development. Lake Mead Parent, LLC, or LM Parent, which is our wholly-owned subsidiary, is the sole member of LM Partners. Upon acquisition, LM Partners owned a portion of Lake Mead Crossing, consisting of approximately 155,100 square feet of rentable commercial space, and LM Development, owned the other portion of Lake Mead Crossing consisting of approximately 66,000 square feet of rentable commercial space.
 
Lake Mead Crossing was purchased with the use of mortgage debt and mezzanine debt. LM Partners received mortgage debt of $29,500,000 from Nevada State Bank, and LM Development received mortgage debt of $2,700,000 from Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A., or Barrington Bank. In addition to the mortgage financing, LM Partners and LM Development entered into mezzanine loan agreements with GK Development and GK Secured Income IV, LLC or GKSI IV, an affiliate of GK Development. The mezzanine loan agreement with GKSI IV is in the maximum amount of $10,500,000 at 8% interest, allocated between LM Partners and LM Development, of which $6,417,483 was outstanding, as of June 30, 2018. The mezzanine loan agreement with GK Development is in the maximum amount of $2,608,100, or the GK Development Loan, allocated between LM Partners and LM Development, of which $0 was outstanding as of June 30, 2018. For more details on the terms of the financing, please see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”
 
After the acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing, the Company, through LM Partners, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Pacific Dental Services, LLC, or PDCS, a former tenant in Lake Mead Crossing, whereby LM Partners agreed to sell to PDCS the building partially occupied by PDCS, containing approximately 7,790 rentable square feet, for $4,000,000, excluding prorations. The sale closed on March 20, 2017 and $2,700,000 of the sale proceeds was used to reduce the outstanding principal balance on the Nevada State Bank note payable and $980,000 of the sales proceeds was used to reduce the outstanding principal balance on the GK Development Loan.
 
As of June 30, 2018, the portion of Lake Mead Crossing owned by LM Partners is 97.2% leased and the portion of Lake Mead Crossing owned by LM Development is 52.5% leased.
 
Proposed program for the renovation, improvement or development of such properties.
 
With respect to Lake Mead Parent, LLC, the commercial rental property is comprised of 147,400 square feet of rentable space for lease to multiple tenants. As of June 30, 2018, approximately 143,200 square feet (97.2%) was leased to seventeen tenants under various leases expiring on various dates between 2019 and 2028. We plan to lease the vacant retail space and currently, we have no present plans for the improvement of the property.
 
With respect to Lake Development, LLC, the commercial rental property is comprised of 66,044 square feet of rentable space for lease to multiple tenants. As of June 30, 2018, 34,700 square feet (52.5%) was leased to three tenants under various leases expiring on various dates between 2018 and 2023. We plan to lease the vacant retail space. In addition, the commercial rental property includes unimproved pad sites which Lake Mead Development, LLC intends to secure one or more tenants for a buildtosuit opportunity. These could include standalone retailers, medical office facilities and/or restaurants. Currently, no tenants have been secured and there are no present plans for the improvement of the property.
 
Lake Mead Crossing is a multi-tenant retail shopping center located in downtown Henderson, Nevada and management believes it has excellent visibility, access and daytime traffic. The neighborhood is dominated by retail and other commercial development and is also provided with an abundance of residential development properties located in subdivisions scattered throughout the market area. Additionally, Lake Mead Crossing is located in the path of substantial residential growth. Cadence, is a 2,200 acre planned residential development located 0.2 miles from Lake Mead Crossing. Under the plan for Cadence, multiple developers are expected to build up to 13,250 homes.
 
A summary of the key competitive conditions are as follows:
 
 
Lake Mead Crossing is located in a well performing commercial corridor with very good visibility;
 
 
 
 
Lake Mead Crossing is the only power center located in downtown Henderson, NV;
 
 
 
 
Lake Mead Crossing has a good parking ratio;
 
 
 
 
Lake Mead Crossing lies in the Las Vegas metropolitan area; and
 
 
 
 
Lake Mead Crossing is shadow anchored by a super Target store.
 
 
42
 
 
Key Tenant Lease Terms
 
Below is a summary of the key lease terms of tenants that currently occupy at least 10% of our gross leasable area, or GLA.
 
 
 
Ross,Dress For Less
 
 
Marshalls
 
 
PetSmart
 
 
Big Lots
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Square Footage
  30,187 
  26,000 
  27,426 
  30,000 
 
    
    
    
    
Percentage of GLA
  14.2%
  12.2%
  12.9%
  14.1%
 
    
    
    
    
Monthly Base Rent
 $25,156 
 $29,250 
 $56,618 
 $26,792 
 
    
    
    
    
Rent/Square Foot
 $10.00 
 $13.50 
 $24.77 
 $10.72 
 
    
    
    
    
Lease Expiration
 
1/31/2020
 
 
3/31/19
 
 
3/31/19
 
 
1/31/2023
 
 
Future Minimum Rent
 
 
 
2018 (Remaining six months)
 $1,643,069 
2019
  2,009,212 
2020
  1,252,788 
2021
  976,322 
2022
  827,767 
Thereafter
  998,345 
Total
 $7,707,505 
 
Schedule of Lease Expirations
 
The following chart shows the number of leases expiring at Lake Mead Crossing in each of the next ten years and the square footage, percentage of overall leased space, and annual rent relating to such expiring leases.
 
 
 
  2019
 
 
 
2020
 
 
 2021
 
 
 
2022
 
 
 2023  
 
 
 
2024
 
 
  2025    
 
 
  2026  
 
 
  2027  
 
 
  2028  
 
 
  2029  
 
Number of Lease Expirations
  8 
  3 
  3 
  2 
  1 
  N/A 
  2 
  N/A 
  N/A 
  1 
  N/A 
 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
Square Footage
  80,413 
  39,487 
  3,800 
  6,500 
  30,000 
  N/A 
  16,470 
  N/A 
  N/A 
  1,180 
  N/A 
 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
Annual Rent
 $1,778,027 
 $556,196 
 $112,512 
  185,860 
  324,000 
  N/A 
 $282,680 
  N/A 
  N/A 
 $45,595 
  N/A 
 
 
43
 

Components Upon Which Depreciation Are Taken
 
The following chart provides the details of how tax depreciation is calculated at Lake Mead Crossing.
 
 
 
FederalTax Basis
 
 
Method
 
 
Lifein Years
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land
 
$
9,241,793
 
 
N/A
 
 
 
N/A
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Building
 
$
27,535,723
 
 
Straight Line
 
 
 
39
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land Improvements
 
$
2,448,433
 
 
150% Double Declining Balance
 
 
 
15
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tenant Improvements
 
$
985,304
 
 
Straight Line
 
 
 
39
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Consideration
 
$
40,211,254
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realty Taxes
 
The following chart provides the details of how taxes are assessed at Lake Mead Crossing.
 
 
 
Lake Mead Crossing
 
 
 
 
 
Realty Tax Rate
  2.90%
 
    
Annual Realty Taxes
 $211,060 
 
Lake Mead Crossing was financed using 100% debt in the form of mortgage debt, mezzanine debt and interim debt. In connection with the financing of Lake Mead Crossing, the following loans are outstanding:
 
 
Lake Mead Partners, LLC, owner of a portion of the property received mortgage debt totaling $29,500,000 with an additional $500,000 that it can use if it chooses. To date, $216,327 of the additional amount has been used. The debt carries an interest rate of 4% and requires principal and interest payments of $144,703. The loan matures on November 12, 2025.
 
 
 
 
Lake Mead Development, LLC, owner of a portion of the property received mortgage debt totaling $2,700,000. The debt carries a floating interest rate equal to the LIBOR plus 2.75% and requires monthly principal payments of $5,450 plus interest. The loan matures on November 12, 2022.
 
 
 
 
Lake Mead Parent, LLC, the owner of Lake Mead Partners and the wholly-owned subsidiary of our company, and Lake Mead Development, LLC received mezzanine debt to purchase Lake Mead Crossing from an affiliate of our manager. Under the promissory note, Lake Mead Parent, LLC and Lake Mead Development, LLC can borrow up to $10,500,000 at 8% interest. The mezzanine loan requires monthly interest payments only. The loan matures on November 12, 2018. The mezzanine loan has outstanding principal of approximately $9,932,483, as of December 31, 2017. This loan has been fully repaid.
 
 
 
 
Lake Mead Development, LLC received an interim loan from our manager in the amount of $20,000. The interim loan carries interest of 7% until the loan is called by our manager. After the loan is called, the interest rate will increase to 8%. Our manager may call the loan at any time and in its sole discretion. This loan has been fully repaid.
 
Lake Mead Crossing contains two unimproved pad sites, each being 30,000 square feet, for future development and lease-up opportunities. Our company may use the unimproved pad sites for ground lease, build-to-suit and/or sell opportunities.
 
 
44
 

2700 Ygnacio
 
Our Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC, acquired an office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California, or 2700 Ygnacio, from an unaffiliated seller for $14,905,290, excluding prorations. 2700 Ygnacio is a three-story, Class A office building with approximately 108,000 rentable square feet. On acquisition, it was 90.0% leased (currently 77.98% leased) to numerous tenants under leases expiring on various dates between 2018 and 2022.
 
The purchase of 2700 Ygnacio was financed using (i) a first mortgage loan in the amount of $11,325,000, all of which was funded upon acquisition, (ii) an interim loan from GK Development of $2,305,000, and (iii) proceeds from this offering of $1,750,000.
 
Corrollo Engineers is the anchor tenant on the property, occupying 37,156 rentable square feet, or 34.41% of the property, under a lease currently scheduled to expire on October 31, 2019.
 
Proposed program for the renovation, improvement or development of such property.
 
2700 Ygnacio is a three-story, Class A office building with approximately 108,000 rentable square feet. The property was built in 1985 and it includes 477 surface parking spaces reflecting an overall parking ratio of 4.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net rent area. On acquisition, it was 90.0% leased (77,98% leased, as of June 30, 2018) to numerous tenants under leases expiring on various dates between 2018 and 2022. We plan to lease the vacant space, renew existing leases when they mature and currently, we have no plans for the improvement of the property.
  
2700 Ygnacio is considered to be the premier office property in its submarket, highlighted institutional-quality construction, contiguous perimeter glass window lines that offer panoramic views of Mount Diablo, abundant parking, and an impressive list of nearby amenities. The prominent location and high quality of tenants provides the stability of a “suburban core” investment along with the opportunity to increase income and value over time as rents in the submarket continue to rebound.
 
A summary of key competitive conditions are as follows:
 
 
2700 Ygnacio is located in a region commonly referred to as North I-680 Corridor, one of the fastest growing regions in the San Francisco Bay Area;
 
 
 
 
2700 Ygnacio is easy to commute from San Francisco and Oakland;
 
 
 
 
2700 Ygnacio has (i) access to both executive and employee housing, (ii) access to public schools that are highly regarded, (iii) access to highly-educated workforce and (iv) easy access to mass transit;
 
 
 
 
2700 Ygnacio has a good parking ratio
 
 
45
 
 
Key Tenant Lease Terms
 
Below is a summary of the key lease terms of tenants that currently occupy at least 10% of our gross leasable area, or GLA.
 
 
 
Stearns
Lending,
LLC
 
 
Carollo
Engineers, PC
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Square Footage
  14,842 
  37,156 
 
    
    
Percent of GLA
  13.75%
  34.42%
 
    
    
Monthly Base Rent
 $28,497 
 $87,317 
 
    
    
Rent/Square Foot
 $23.04 
 $28.20 
 
    
    
Lease Expirations
 
7/31/2021
 
 
10/31/2019
 
 
Future Minimum Rent
 
2018 (remaining six months)
 $1,070,135 
2019
  1,915,969 
2020
  851,385 
2021
  599,014 
2022
  192,950 
Thereafter
  239,632 
 
    
Total
 $4,869,085 
 
 
46
 

Schedule of Lease Expiration
 
The following chart shows the number of leases expiring at 2700 Ygnacio in each of the next six years and the square footage, and current annual rent relating to such expiring leases.
 
 
 
2018
 
 
2019
 
 
2020
 
 
2021
 
 
2022
 
 
2023
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of Lease Expirations
  5 
  1 
  4 
  0 
  4 
  1 
 
    
    
    
    
    
    
Square Footage
  909 
  48,524 
  1,341 
  22,273 
  6,340 
  3,783 
 
    
    
    
    
    
    
Annual Rent
 $21,816 
 $1,353,518 
 $36,475 
 $517,908 
 $152,757 
 $129,319 
 
Components Upon Which Depreciation Are Taken
 
The following chart provides the details of how tax depreciation is calculated at 2700 Ygnacio.
 
 
 
Federal Tax
Basis
 
 
Method
 
 
Life in
Years
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land
 $3,742,420 
  N/A 
  N/A 
 
    
    
    
    
Building
 $8,640,447 
 
Straight Line
 
  39 
 
    
    
    
    
Land Improvements
 $1,351,422 
 
150% Double Declining Balance
 
  15 
 
    
    
    
    
Personal Property
 $1,171,001 
 
200% Double Declining Balance
 
  7 
 
    
 
    
    
Tenant Improvements
 $1,171,001
 
 
  Straight Line
 
 39
 
 
    
    
    
    
 
 $14,905,290 
    
    
    
 
Realty Taxes
 
The following chart provides the details of how taxes are assessed at 2700 Ygnacio.
 
 
 
2700 Ygnacio
 
 
 
 
 
Realty Tax Rate
  1.1009%
 
    
Annual Realty Taxes
 $188,604 
 
 
47
 

  MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
 
The following discussion is a summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Bonds, but does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential tax consequences. The discussion is based upon the Code, current, temporary and proposed U.S. Treasury regulations issued under the Code, or collectively the Treasury Regulations, the legislative history of the Code, IRS rulings, pronouncements, interpretations and practices, and judicial decisions now in effect, all of which are subject to change at any time. Any such change may be applied retroactively in a manner that could adversely affect a holder of the Bonds. This discussion does not address all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to a holder in light of such holder’s particular circumstances or to holders subject to special rules, including, without limitation:
 
 
a broker-dealer or a dealer in securities or currencies;
 
 
 
 
an S corporation;
 
 
 
 
a bank, thrift or other financial institution;
 
 
 
 
a regulated investment company or a real estate investment trust;
 
 
 
 
an insurance company
 
 
 
 
a tax-exempt organization;
 
 
 
 
a person subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code;
 
 
 
 
a person holding the Bonds as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion, integrated or other risk reduction or constructive sale transaction;
 
 
 
 
a partnership or other pass-through entity;
 
 
 
 
a person deemed to sell the Bonds under the constructive sale provisions of the Code;
 
 
 
 
a U.S. person whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. dollar; or
 
 
 
 
a U.S. expatriate or former long-term resident.
 
In addition, this discussion is limited to persons that purchase the Bonds in this offering for cash and that hold the Bonds as “capital assets” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment). This discussion does not address the effect of any applicable state, local, non-U.S. or other tax laws, including gift and estate tax laws.
 
As used herein, “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of the Bonds that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
 
 
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
 
 
 
 
a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
 
 
 
 
an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or
 
 
 
 
a trust that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a U.S. court and the control of one or more U.S. persons that have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.
 
 
48
 

If an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds the Bonds, the tax treatment of an owner of the entity generally will depend upon the status of the particular owner and the activities of the entity. If you are an owner of an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, you should consult your tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Bonds.
 
We have not sought and will not seek any rulings from the IRS with respect to the matters discussed below. There can be no assurance that the IRS will not take a different position concerning the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership or disposition of the Bonds or that any such position would not be sustained.
 
THIS SUMMARY OF MATERIAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE TAX ADVICE. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE TAX CONSIDERATIONS DISCUSSED BELOW TO THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATIONS, POTENTIAL CHANGES IN APPLICABLE TAX LAWS AND THE APPLICATION OF ANY STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN OR OTHER TAX LAWS, INCLUDING GIFT AND ESTATE TAX LAWS, AND ANY TAX TREATIES.
 
U.S. Holders
 
Interest
 
U.S. Holder generally will be required to recognize and include in gross income any stated interest as ordinary income at the time it is paid or accrued on the Bonds in accordance with such holder’s method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
 
Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of the Bonds
 
A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss on the sale, exchange, redemption (including a partial redemption), retirement or other taxable disposition of a Bond equal to the difference between the sum of the cash and the fair market value of any property received in exchange therefore (less a portion allocable to any accrued and unpaid stated interest, which generally will be taxable as ordinary income if not previously included in such holder’s income) and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Bond. A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in a Bond (or a portion thereof) generally will be the U.S. Holder’s cost therefore decreased by any payment on the Bond other than a payment of qualified stated interest. This gain or loss will generally constitute capital gain or loss. In the case of a non-corporate U.S. Holder, including an individual, if the Bond has been held for more than one year, such capital gain may be subject to reduced federal income tax rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain limitations.
 
Medicare Tax
 
Certain individuals, trusts and estates are subject to a Medicare tax of 3.8% on the lesser of (i) ”net investment income”, or (ii) the excess of modified adjusted gross income over a threshold amount. Net investment income generally includes interest income and net gains from the disposition of Bonds, unless such interest payments or net gains are derived in the ordinary course of the conduct of a trade or business (other than a trade or business that consists of certain passive or trading activities). U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the possible implications of the Medicare tax on their ownership and disposition of Bonds in light of their individual circumstances.

 
49
 
 
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
 
A U.S. Holder may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding when such holder receives interest and principal payments on the Bonds or proceeds upon the sale or other disposition of such Bonds (including a redemption or retirement of the Bonds). Certain holders (including, among others, corporations and certain tax-exempt organizations) generally are not subject to information reporting or backup withholding. A U.S. Holder will be subject to backup withholding if such holder is not otherwise exempt and:
 
 
such holder fails to furnish its taxpayer identification number, or TIN, which, for an individual is ordinarily his or her social security number;
 
 
 
 
the IRS notifies the payor that such holder furnished an incorrect TIN;
 
 
 
 
in the case of interest payments such holder is notified by the IRS of a failure to properly report payments of interest or dividends;
 
 
 
 
in the case of interest payments, such holder fails to certify, under penalties of perjury, that such holder has furnished a correct TIN and that the IRS has not notified such holder that it is subject to backup withholding; or
 
 
 
 
such holder does not otherwise establish an exemption from backup withholding.
 
A U.S. Holder should consult its tax advisor regarding its qualification for an exemption from backup withholding and the procedures for obtaining such an exemption, if applicable. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability or may be refunded, provided the required information is furnished in a timely manner to the IRS.
 
Non-U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult their tax advisors.

 
50
 
 
 DESCRIPTION OF BONDS
   
This description sets forth certain terms of the Bonds that we are offering pursuant to this Offering Circular. In this section, we use capitalized words to signify terms that are specifically defined in the Indenture, by and between us and UMB Bank, as trustee, or the trustee. This section contains definitions of certain capitalized terms that are used herein. We refer you to the Indenture for a full disclosure of all such terms, as well as any other capitalized terms used in this Offering Circular for which no definition is provided.
 
Because this section is a summary, it does not describe every aspect of the Bonds or the Indenture. We urge you to read the Indenture because that document and not this summary defines your rights as a Bondholders. Please review a copy of the Indenture. The Indenture is filed as an exhibit to the offering statement, of which this offering circular is a part, at www.sec.gov. You may also obtain a copy of the Indenture from us without charge. See “Where You Can Find More Information” for more information. You may also review the Indenture at the trustee’s corporate trust office at 1670 Broadway, Denver, Colorado 80202.
 
Ranking
 
The Bonds are our direct, senior unsecured obligations and:
 
 
rank equally with each other and with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness outstanding from time to time;
 
 
 
 
rank senior to all of our future indebtedness that by its terms is expressly subordinate to the Bonds;
 
 
 
 
effectively rank junior to any of our future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and
 
 
 
 
effectively are structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations of each of our subsidiaries, including the claims of mortgage lenders holding secured indebtedness, as to the specific property receiving each lender’s mortgage and other secured indebtedness.
 
Manner of Offering
 
The offering is being made on a best-efforts basis through JCC Advisors, LLC, our Managing Broker-Dealer, as well as other selected dealers, or Selling Group Members. Our Managing Broker-Dealer, nor any Selling Group Member, will be required to purchase any of our Bonds.
 
Interest and Maturity
 
The Bonds will mature on September 30, 2022 and will bear interest at a fixed rate of 7% per annum. Interest on the Bonds will be paid monthly on the 15th day of the month. The first interest payment on a Bond will be paid on the 15th day of the month following the issuance of such Bond.
 
THE REQUIRED INTEREST PAYMENTS AND PRINCIPAL PAYMENT ARE NOT A GUARANTY OF ANY RETURN TO YOU NOR ARE THEY A GUARANTY OF THE RETURN OF YOUR INVESTED CAPITAL. While our company is required to make the Interest Payments and Principal Payment as described in the Indenture and above, we do not intend to establish a sinking fund to fund such payments. Therefore, our ability to honor these obligations will be subject to our ability to generate sufficient cash flow or procure additional financing in order to fund those payments. If we cannot generate sufficient cash flow or procure additional financing to honor these obligations, we may be forced to sell some or all of our company’s assets to fund the payments, or we may not be able to fund the payments in their entirety or at all. If we cannot fund the above payments, Bondholders will have claims against us with respect to such violation.
 
 
51
 

Optional Redemption
 
We may redeem the Bonds in whole or in part, at any time. If we plan to redeem our Bonds, we are required to give notice of redemption not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days prior to any date of redemption, the Redemption Date, to each Bondholder’s address appearing in the securities register maintained by the trustee. In the event we elect to redeem less than all of the Bonds, the particular Bonds to be redeemed will be selected by the trustee by such method as the trustee shall deem fair and appropriate.
 
If the Redemption Date is on or before September 30, 2019, our company will pay the Bondholder an amount equal to 1.02 times the Price to Public for each Bond being redeemed at that time. If the Redemption Date is after September 30, 2019 but on or before September 30, 2020, our company will pay the Bondholder 1.015 times to the Price to Public for each Bond redeemed at that time. If the Redemption Date is after September 30, 2020 but on or before September 30, 2021, our company will pay the Bondholder 1.01 times to the Price to Public for each Bond redeemed at that time. If the Redemption Date is after September 30, 2021, our company will pay the Bondholder the Price to Public for each Bond redeemed at that time.
 
Redemption Upon Death or Disability
 
Our manager has adopted the following policy regarding the repurchase of Bonds upon the death or disability of a Bondholder. This policy is not a feature of the Bonds themselves or contained in the Indenture or any other agreement related to the Bonds.
 
In the event of death or disability of a Bondholder, Bonds may be presented to us for repurchase, or the Bond Repurchase. All or a portion (consisting of at least 25%), of the Bonds beneficially held by a Bondholder may be submitted to us for repurchase at any time in accordance with the procedures outlined below. At that time, the Company may, subject to the conditions and limitations described below, repurchase the Bonds presented for cash to the extent that we have sufficient funds available. Neither we, GK Development, nor its affiliates will receive any fees from us to complete any transactions under the Bond Repurchase.
 
The repurchase amount for the Bonds will be the amount that was paid for the Bonds subject to the Bond Repurchase. GK Development may also choose to amend, suspend or terminate the Bond Repurchase upon 30 days’ notice at any time.
 
In order for a disability to be considered a “qualifying disability,” (1) the Bondholder must receive a determination of disability based upon a physical or mental condition or impairment arising after the date the Bondholder first acquired the Bonds subject to the Bond Repurchase, and (2) such determination of disability must be made by the governmental agency responsible for reviewing the disability retirement benefits that the Bondholder could be eligible to receive. The “applicable governmental agencies” are limited to the following: (1) the Social Security Administration; (2) the U.S. Office of Personnel Management; or (3) the Veteran’s Benefits Administration.
 
Disability determinations by governmental agencies for purposes other than those listed above, including but not limited to worker’s compensation insurance, administration or enforcement of the Rehabilitation Act or Americans with Disabilities Act, or waiver of insurance premiums, will not entitle a Bondholder to the Bond Repurchase unless otherwise permitted by us. Repurchase requests following an award by the applicable governmental agency of disability benefits must be accompanied by: (1) the investor’s initial application for disability benefits; (2) a Social Security Administration Notice of Award, (3) a U.S. Office of Personnel Management determination of disability, (4) a Veteran’s Benefits Administration record of disability-related discharge or (5) such other documentation issued by the applicable governmental agency that we deem acceptable demonstrating an award of the disability benefits.
 
The following disabilities do not entitle a worker to Social Security disability benefits:
 
 
disabilities occurring after the legal retirement age;
 
 
 
 
temporary disabilities; and
 
 
 
 
disabilities that do not render a worker incapable of performing substantial gainful activity.
 
During any calendar year, we will not repurchase more than 5% of the weighted average number of Bonds outstanding during the prior calendar year, or the 5% Limitation. Repurchase requests will be reviewed based on the order they are received. The cash available for the Bond Repurchase will be limited to the available cash flows from operations or proceeds from sale of assets, or the Cash Limitation.
 
 
52
 
 
Merger, Consolidation or Sale
 
We may consolidate or merge with or into any other corporation, and we may sell, lease or convey all or substantially all of our assets to any corporation, provided that the successor entity, if other than us:
 
 
is organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America or any United States, or U.S., state or the District of Columbia; and
 
 
 
 
assumes all of our obligations to perform and observe all of our obligations under the Bonds and the Indenture;
 
and provided further that no Event of Default (as defined below) shall have occurred and be continuing.
 
Except as described below under “- Certain Covenants - Offer to Repurchase Upon a Change of Control Repurchase Event,” the Indenture does not provide for any right of acceleration in the event of a consolidation, merger, sale of all or substantially all of the assets, recapitalization or change in our stock ownership. In addition, the Indenture does not contain any provision which would protect the Bondholders against a sudden and dramatic decline in credit quality resulting from takeovers, recapitalizations or similar restructurings.
 
Certain Covenants
 
Equity-Bond Ratio and Forced Sale Agreements
 
The Bonds will be unsecured; however, our company will be required to comply with the Equity-Bond Ratio covenant by owning real property with aggregate equity value of at least 70% of the outstanding principal of the Bonds, or the Equity-Bond Ratio. The equity subject to any future Forced Sale Agreements will also be included in the Equity-Bond Ratio. For properties owned, directly or indirectly, by our company, the equity value for purposes of the Equity-Bond Ratio will initially be the equity invested into the applicable property. Each acquired property will be required to be appraised, by an independent third party appraiser, annually during the term of the Bonds, and, following any such appraisal, our company’s equity value from a newly appraised property will be adjusted to equal the appraised value of the property less the outstanding indebtedness secured by such property and multiplied by our company’s ownership interest in the applicable property, in the event we acquire a partial interest in any property.
 
 
53
 
 
As with all non-payment defaults, our company will have a 120-day cure period to cure any breach of the Equity-Bond Ratio covenant before a default may be declared relative to such covenant. Any cure may be made by either acquiring additional property or entering into Additional Forced Sale Agreements.
 
As of June 30, 2018, we have an Equity-Bond Ratio of 157.94%. The Equity-Bond Ratio was calculated using (i) an apprised value of Lake Mead Crossing of $46,365,000 with debt related to Lake Mead Crossing totaling $34,488,766, (ii) an appraised value of 27000 Ygnacio of $18,000,000 with debt related to 2700 Ygnacio totaling $10,990,990, and $11,948,000 of outstanding principal of the Bonds.
 
Cash Coverage Ratio and Cash Flow Loans
 
While any Bonds remain outstanding, the Indenture provides that our company will maintain cash and cash equivalents, as defined by GAAP, equal to at least 120% of our company’s Bond Service Obligations for a period of three (3) months. Our company will be required to make monthly reports of its cash and cash equivalents to the trustee to ensure compliance with the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant. If our company falls out of compliance with the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant, it will have 120 days to cure such non-compliance.
 
Our company has entered into loan agreements with the Ridgmar Lender and Lakeview Lenders, whereby the Cash Flow Lenders are obligated to advance our company up to the entirety of the monthly distributions to them from their indirect ownership interest in Ridgmar and Lakeview Square, respectively, in order to enable our company to meet the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant. Any such advances will be represented by a promissory note, subordinate to the Bonds, that will bear interest at the then in effect IRS imputed interest rate and will have the same maturity date as the Bonds. We will be required to represent to the Ridgmar Lender or the Lakeview Lenders that we require such a loan in order to comply with the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant in order to receive such a loan. Prior to the Cash Flow Loans’ maturity date, our company may, but is not required, to make payments on the Cash Flow Loans at its discretion. At its discretion, our company may enter into substantial similar arrangements with other affiliates of GK Development in order to provide cash to our company to ensure compliance with the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant; provided, that the repayment of any loan from an affiliate of GK Development to our company shall be subordinate to the Bonds. To date, our company has not required any proceeds of the Cash Flow Loans to comply with the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant.
 
Limitations of the Forced Sale Agreements and Cash Flow Loans
 
We expect that any equity in a property that is subject to a Forced Sale Agreement may be financed using debt. We expect the terms of such debt to provide that the borrower will be in default if the ownership interest in the property, directly or indirectly, changes without lender consent. We expect that under terms of such loans, if the borrower is in default, the lender has the ability to accelerate the debt and charge certain penalties payable by the borrower. As a result, it may not be possible or it may be prohibitively expensive to sell the equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement without lender consent. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – The Effectiveness of our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement and call the loans of Lake Mead Crossing, 2700 Ygnacio and future acquired properties may be limited by covenants and penalties in debt documents for senior mortgages secured by the respective underlying properties” and “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement may be limited due to covenants contained in the senior and mezzanine debt secured by those properties” for more information.
 
The existing Cash Flow Loan Agreements and any future Forced Sale Agreements or Cash Flow Loan Agreements are not expected to limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders, or any other holder of equity subject to such an agreement, to sell their equity, nor do those agreements preclude a sale of the underlying real properties. In either circumstance, we would lose our rights to Cash Flow Loans relative to the interest sold, and the value of the interest sold would no longer be available to support the Equity-Bond Ratio or the repayment of the Bonds in the event the trustee exercised its rights under the Forced Sale Agreements. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Neither any future Forced Sale Agreements nor any current or future Cash Flow Loan Agreements limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders to sell their indirect equity in Lakeview Square, Ridgmar, or any equity subject to a future Forced Sale Agreement or Cash Flow Loan to an unaffiliated third party, nor do they preclude the sale of the underlying real properties” for more information.
 
 
54
 
 
We may enter into Forced Sale Agreements with affiliates. If we do, we anticipate the terms of the Forced Sale Agreements to be substantially similar to the expired Forced Sale Agreements related to Ridgmar and Lakeview Square, which were filed as exhibits to our Current Report on Form 1-U, filed with the SEC on October 6, 2016. As a result, the risks associated with the Forced Sale Agreements are expected to include, but not be limited to (i) the inability to effectively sell the affected equity due to restrictions contained in the underlying senior and mezzanine debt documents, (ii) the ability of the property owner to sell the property without the consent of the trustee, and (iii) the ability of the holder of the affected equity to sell the affected equity without the consent of the trustee.
 
Offer to Repurchase Upon a Change of Control Repurchase Event
 
Change of Control Repurchase Event” means (A) the acquisition by any person, including any syndicate or group deemed to be a “person” under Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, of beneficial ownership, directly or indirectly, through a purchase, merger or other acquisition transaction or series of purchases, mergers or other acquisition transactions of the membership units entitling that person to exercise more than 50% of the total voting power of all the membership units entitled to vote in meetings of our company (except that such person will be deemed to have beneficial ownership of all securities that such person has the right to acquire, whether such right is currently exercisable or is exercisable only upon the occurrence of a subsequent condition); and (B) following the closing of any transaction referred to in subsection (A), neither we nor the acquiring or surviving entity has a class of common securities (or American Depositary Receipts representing such securities) listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, the NYSE Amex Equities, or the NYSE Amex, or the Nasdaq Stock Market, or listed or quoted on an exchange or quotation system that is a successor to the NYSE, the NYSE Amex or the Nasdaq Stock Market.
 
If a Change of Control Repurchase Event occurs, unless we have exercised our option to redeem the Bonds as described under “- Optional Redemption,” we will make an offer to each Bondholder to repurchase all or any part of that Bondholder’s Bonds at a repurchase price equal to 1.02 times the Price to Public if on or before September 30, 2019, 1.015 times the Price to Public if such event occurs after September 30, 2019 but on or before the September 30, 2020, 1.01 times the Price to Public if such event occurs after September 30, 2020 but on or before September 30, 2021, and at the Price to Public if such event occurs after September 30, 2021, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including the repurchase date.
 
Reports
 
We will furnish the following reports to each Bondholder:
 
Reporting Requirements under Tier II of Regulation A. We are required to comply with certain ongoing disclosure requirements under Rule 257 of Regulation A. We are required to file: an annual report with the SEC on Form 1-K; a semi-annual report with the SEC on Form 1-SA; current reports with the SEC on Form 1-U; and a notice under cover of Form 1-Z. The necessity to file current reports will be triggered by certain corporate events, similar to the ongoing reporting obligation faced by issuers under the Exchange Act, however the requirement to file a Form 1-U is expected to be triggered by significantly fewer corporate events than that of the Form 8-K. Parts I & II of Form 1-Z will be filed by us if and when we decide to and are no longer obligated to file and provide annual reports pursuant to the requirements of Regulation A.
 
Annual Reports. As soon as practicable, but in no event later than one hundred twenty (120) days after the close of our fiscal year, ending December 31st, our manager will cause to be mailed or made available, by any reasonable means, to each Bondholder as of a date selected by our manager, an annual report containing financial statements of our company for such fiscal year, presented in accordance with GAAP, including a balance sheet and statements of operations, Company equity and cash flows, with such statements having been audited by an accountant selected by our manager. Our manager shall be deemed to have made a report available to each Bondholder as required if it has either (i) filed such report with the SEC via its Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) system and such report is publicly available on such system or (ii) made such report available on any website maintained by our company and available for viewing by the Bondholders. 

 
55
 
 
Insurance
 
We will, and will cause each of our subsidiaries to, keep all of its insurable property insured against loss or damage at least equal to their then full insurable value with insurers of recognized responsibility and having an A.M Best policy holder’s rating of not less than A-V.
 
Payment of Taxes and Other Claims
 
We will pay or discharge or cause to be paid or discharged, before the same shall become delinquent: (i) all taxes, assessments and governmental charges levied or imposed upon us or any subsidiary or upon the income, profits or property of us or any subsidiary; and (ii) all lawful claims for labor, materials and supplies which, if unpaid, might by law become a lien upon the property of us or any subsidiary; provided, however, that we shall not be required to pay or discharge or cause to be paid or discharged any such tax, assessment, charge or claim whose amount, applicability or validity is being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings or for which we have set apart and maintain an adequate reserve.
 
There is no public market for the Bonds. We may apply for quotation of the Bonds on an alternative trading system or over the counter market beginning after the final closing of this offering. However, even if the Bonds are listed or quoted, no assurance can be given as to (1) the likelihood that an active market for the Bonds will develop, (2) the liquidity of any such market, (3) the ability of Bondholders to sell the Bonds or (4) the prices that Bondholders may obtain for any of the Bonds. No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales of the Bonds, or the availability of the Bonds for future sale, will have on the market price prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of the Bonds, or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices of the Bonds. See “Risk Factors — Investment Risks.”
 
Event of Default
 
The following are Events of Default under the Indenture with respect to the Bonds:
 
 
default in the payment of any interest on the Bonds when due and payable, which continues for thirty (30) days, a Cure Period;
 
 
 
 
default in the payment of any principal of or premium on the Bonds when due, which continues for thirty (30) days, a Cure Period;
 
 
 
 
default in the performance of any other obligation or covenant contained in the Indenture or in this Offering Circular for the benefit of the Bonds, which continues for one hundred twenty (120) days after written notice, a Cure Period;
 
 
 
 
specified events in bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of us; and
 
 
 
 
any final and non-appealable judgment or order for the payment of money in excess of $25,000,000 singly, or in the aggregate for all such final judgments or orders against all such Persons shall be rendered against us or any Significant Subsidiary and shall not be paid or discharged.
 
Book-entry and other indirect Bondholders should consult their banks or brokers for information on how to give notice or direction to or make a request of the trustee and how to declare or rescind an acceleration of maturity.
 
Annually, within 120 days following December 31st while the Bonds are outstanding, we will furnish to the trustee a written statement of certain of our officers certifying that to their knowledge we are in compliance with the Indenture, or else specifying any Default and the nature and status thereof. We will also deliver to the trustee a written notification of any uncured Default within 30 days after we become aware of such uncured Default.

 
56
 
 
Remedies if an Event of Default Occurs
 
Subject to any respective Cure Period, if an Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the trustee or the Bondholders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds may declare the principal thereof, premium, if any, and all unpaid interest thereon to be due and payable immediately. In such event, the trustee will have the right force us to sell any real property held by us or any subsidiary of ours that we have the unilateral right to cause it to sell its assets. We will be required to contribute the proceeds of any such sale to the repayment of the Bonds. With respect to subsidiaries for which we do not have the unilateral right to sell their assets (for example, if we acquire a property in a joint venture), the trustee has the right to force us to sell our equity in such subsidiary in order to repay the Bonds.
 
If the sale of our assets is insufficient to repay all obligations under the Bonds, then the trustee will also have the right to force the sale of any equity interest or property then subject to a Forced Sale Agreement.
 
Limitations of the Forced Sale Agreements
 
We expect that any equity in a property that is subject to a Forced Sale Agreement may be financed using debt. We expect the terms of such debt to provide that the borrower will be in default if the ownership interest in the property, directly or indirectly, changes without lender consent. We expect that under terms of such loans, if the borrower is in default, the lender has the ability to accelerate the debt and charge certain penalties payable by the borrower. As a result, it may not be possible or it may be prohibitively expensive to sell the equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement without lender consent. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – The Effectiveness of our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement and call the loans of Lake Mead Crossing, 2700 Ygnacio and future acquired properties may be limited by covenants and penalties in debt documents for senior mortgages secured by the respective underlying properties” and “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement may be limited due to covenants contained in the senior and mezzanine debt secured by those properties” for more information.
 
The existing Cash Flow Loan Agreements and any future Forced Sale Agreements or Cash Flow Loan Agreements are not expected to limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders, or any other holder of equity subject to such an agreement, to sell their equity, nor do those agreements preclude a sale of the underlying real properties. In either circumstance, we would lose our rights to Cash Flow Loans relative to the interest sold, and the value of the interest sold would no longer be available to support the Equity-Bond Ratio or the repayment of the Bonds in the event the trustee exercised its rights under the Forced Sale Agreements. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Neither any future Forced Sale Agreements nor any current or future Cash Flow Loan Agreements limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders to sell their indirect equity in Lakeview Square, Ridgmar, or any equity subject to a future Forced Sale Agreement or Cash Flow Loan to an unaffiliated third party, nor do they preclude the sale of the underlying real properties” for more information.
 
We may enter into Forced Sale Agreements with affiliates. If we do, we anticipate the terms of the Forced Sale Agreements to be substantially similar to the expired Forced Sale Agreements related to Ridgmar and Lakeview Square, which were filed as exhibits to our Current Report on Form 1-U, filed with the SEC on October 6, 2016. As a result, the risks associated with the Forced Sale Agreements are expected to include, but not be limited to (i) the inability to effectively sell the affected equity due to restrictions contained in the underlying senior and mezzanine debt documents, (ii) the ability of the property owner to sell the property without the consent of the trustee, and (iii) the ability of the holder of the affected equity to sell the affected equity without the consent of the trustee.
 
At any time after the trustee or the Bondholders have accelerated the repayment of the principal, premium, if any, and all unpaid interest on the Bonds, but before the trustee has obtained a judgment or decree for payment of money due, the Bondholders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of outstanding Bonds may rescind and annul that acceleration and its consequences, provided that all payments and/or deliveries due, other than those due as a result of acceleration, have been made and all Events of Default have been remedied or waived.
 
The Bondholders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Bonds may waive any default with respect to that series, except a default:
 
 
in the payment of any amounts due and payable or deliverable under the Bonds; or
 
 
 
 
in an obligation contained in, or a provision of, the Indenture which cannot be modified under the terms of the Indenture without the consent of each Bondholder
 
 
57
 
 
The Bondholders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Bonds may direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the trustee or exercising any trust or power conferred on the trustee with respect to the Bonds, provided that (i) such direction is not in conflict with any rule of law or the Indenture, (ii) the trustee may take any other action deemed proper by the trustee that is not inconsistent with such direction and (iii) the trustee need not take any action that might involve it in personal liability or be unduly prejudicial to the Bondholders not joining therein. Subject to the provisions of the Indenture relating to the duties of the trustee, before proceeding to exercise any right or power under the Indenture at the direction of the Bondholders, the trustee is entitled to receive from those Bondholders security or indemnity satisfactory to the trustee against the costs, expenses and liabilities which it might incur in complying with any direction.
 
A Bondholder has the right to institute a proceeding with respect to the Indenture or for any remedy under the Indenture, if:
 
 
that Bondholder previously gives to the trustee written notice of a continuing Event of Default in excess of any Cure Period,
 
 
 
 
the Bondholders of not less than a majority in principal amount of the outstanding bonds have made written request;
 
 
 
 
such Bondholder or Bondholders have offered to indemnify the trustee against the costs, expenses and liabilities incurred in connection with such request;
 
 
 
 
the trustee has not received from the Bondholders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Bonds a direction inconsistent with the request (it being understood and intended that no one or more of such Bondholders shall have any right in any manner whatever by virtue of, or by availing of, any provision of the Indenture to affect, disturb or prejudice the rights of any other of such Bondholders, or to obtain or to seek to obtain priority or preference over any other of such Bondholders or to enforce any rights under the Indenture, except in the manner herein provided and for equal and ratable benefit of all Bondholders); and
 
 
 
 
the trustee fails to institute the proceeding within 60 days.
 
However, the Bondholder has the right, which is absolute and unconditional, to receive payment of the principal of and interest on such Bond on the respective due dates (or, in the case of redemption, on the Redemption Date) and to institute suit for the enforcement of any such payment and such rights shall not be impaired without the consent of such Bondholder.
 
 
 
58
 
 
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
There are currently no legal proceedings involving our company.
 
On December 23, 2015, the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois entered a consent order censuring GK Development, Inc., our manager, and Garo Kholamian, the President, sole director and sole shareholder of our manager for violation of the Illinois Securities Act related to certain previous private offerings. The Illinois Secretary of State stated in the order that it is not intended to trigger or otherwise result in disqualification from the usage of Regulation A or Regulation D. The Illinois Secretary of State alleged failures of risk disclosure in those offerings based upon the actual performance of those programs and to disclose certain prior performance information considered required by the Illinois Secretary of State. Our manager and Mr. Kholamian disputed these allegations but, nevertheless, on December 22, 2015 stipulated to the entry of the consent order to settle this matter without any admission of the veracity of the alleged facts or conclusions of law of the Illinois Secretary of State.
 
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
 
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners (5% or more)
 
Title of Class
 
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
 
Percent of Class
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
 
Garo Kholamian(1)(2)
 
67.81% Membership Interest
 
67.81%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
 
Nancy Kholamian(2)(3)
 
12.61% Membership Interest
 
12.61%
 
Security Ownership of Management
 
Title of Class
 
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
 
Percent of Class
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Class A
 
Management(2)
 
84.19% Membership Interest
 
84.19%
____________
 
(1)
Held by Garo Kholamian individually and through the Garo Kholamian Revocable Trust, and the Kholamian Family Insurance Trust.
 
 
(2)
Address is: 257 East Main Street, Suite 200, Barrington, IL 60010.
 
 
(3)
Held by Nancy Kholamian individually and through the Nancy Kholamian Revocable Trust.
 
 
 
59
 
 
 DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
 
The following table sets forth information on the directors and executive officers of GK Development. Our company is managed by GK Development, its sole manager. Consequently, our company does not have its own separate directors or executive officers.
 
Name
 
Age
 
Position with our Company
 
Director/Officer Since
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Garo Kholamian
 
59
 
President and Sole Director
 
1995
Sherry Mast
 
50
 
Principal - Leasing
 
1997
Gregory C. Kveton
 
61
 
Principal - Development
 
2002
Susan Dewar
 
59
 
Senior Vice President - Acquisitions
 
2004
Matt Leiter
 
45
 
Senior Vice President - Equity Markets
 
2011
Melissa Pielet
 
52
 
Principal - Equity Markets
 
2013
Colin Hartzell
 
37
 
Vice President – Financial Planning and Control
 
2018
 
Executive Officers
 
Set forth below is biographical information for GK Development’s executive officers.
 
Garo Kholamian, age 59, is the President, sole Director and sole shareholder of GK Development. Since the formation of the GK Development in 1995, Mr. Kholamian and his affiliates have acquired and developed over 120 million square feet of commercial property including apartments, office and commercial rental. Prior to forming GK Development, Mr. Kholamian was Senior Vice President of Development for Homart Development Co., the real estate development arm of Sears Roebuck, specializing in regional shopping malls, power centers and office buildings. At Homart, Mr. Kholamian was responsible for site selection, negotiation and project development and management of Homart’s community shopping centers, including over 2.2 million square feet of commercial rental space in the Midwest and Florida. Before managing the development of these centers, Mr. Kholamian assisted in the development of 1.5 million square feet of regional malls and 1.1 million square feet of office space throughout the U.S. for Homart. Mr. Kholamian received his Master’s Degree in Business Management from Loyola University of Chicago in 1985 and his Bachelor’s Degree in Architecture from the Illinois Institute of Technology in 1981. He is a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers and a licensed real estate broker in Illinois.
 
Sherry Mast, age 50, is the Principal - Leasing at GK Development. Ms. Mast joined GK Development in 1997 and, prior to taking over leasing, established property management and financial systems for GK Development. Ms. Mast is responsible for leasing of the company’s entire portfolio and manages outside broker relationships, as well as day-to-day leasing activity. Prior to joining GK Development, Ms. Mast was Marketing Manager for Karp’s, a nationally recognized bakery supply company. There she was responsible for new product development, creating bakery supply solutions for national retailers. From joining that company in 1992, Ms. Mast was involved in the creation of new products and worked closely with national clients, including Starbucks Coffee, Wal-Mart, Dominick’s Finer Foods and American Superstores. Prior to joining Karp’s, Ms. Mast was Quality Assurance Associate for Hyatt Hotel Corporation from 1989 through 1992. There she assisted in improving customer relations and maintaining Hyatt’s industry-leading service standards. Ms. Mast received her Bachelor’s Degree in Corporate Communications from Northern Illinois University. She is a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers and is a registered real estate salesperson in Illinois.
 
Gregory C. Kveton, age 61, is the Principal - Development at GK Development. He joined GK Development in 2002 to spearhead the company’s ground-up development team by identifying opportunities in emerging growth markets. He also directs new development and ongoing capital construction. During his tenure, GK Development has specialized in projects that deliver steady, increasing value for GK Development’s investors, tenants and community. Previously, Greg was Senior Vice President - Operations with fiscal and operation responsibility for GK Development’s portfolio. Before he joined GK Development, he was Vice President of Asset Management in the commercial rental group of Lend Lease Real Estate Investments, where he was responsible for project oversight for power center development in the western United States. At Homart Development Company, the real estate development arm of Sears Roebuck, Greg was National Director of the Community Centers group, where he oversaw asset and property management for the company’s power and community centers portfolio. Greg graduated from Iowa State University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration, and holds both the Certified Shopping Center Manager and Certified Retail Property Executive designations from the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC).
 
 
60
 
 
Susan Dewar, age 59, is the Senior Vice President - Acquisitions at GK Development. Susan joined GK Development in 2004, enriching the team with her extensive background in commercial, office and industrial real estate. Susan is responsible for reviewing and assessing each potential acquisition for GK Development. She has been actively involved in the acquisition and financing of several regional malls, including a portfolio of four malls totaling more than 1.74 million square feet. She was previously involved in obtaining financing for several of GK Development’s properties, and maintains a presence in both the local and national banking communities. Previously, Susan was Vice President of Real Estate for the Elmer J. Krauss Organization, at the time, the largest industrial real estate owner in the State of Florida. While with Krauss, she oversaw more than 30 acquisition/disposition transactions in a 3-year period, including all due diligence and financing. In addition, she was responsible for all property and asset management for the entire portfolio. Susan attended the University of Houston, focusing on Business and Real Estate, and is a licensed real estate broker in the State of Florida. She is a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC), a Certified Property Manager, and a 20-year member of the Institute of Real Estate Management.
 
Matt Leiter, age 45, is the Senior Vice President - Equity Markets at GK Development. Matt manages legacy investments and its investors. Matt also structures new investment products for distribution to Broker Dealers, Family Offices, and Institutional investors. Matt manages and monitors the financial performance of the company’s four equity funds and seven single-asset real estate investment offerings. He has also selected and managed GK’s National Sales, Key Accounts and Wholesaling team, leading them to more than $50 million raised in less than two-years, allowing for the purchase or recapitalization of more than $150 million of real estate assets. Before joining GK Development, he was General Manager at the Leiter Group, a Florida real estate development firm with a focus on mixed-use multi-family public/private projects. There he led in managing and developing projects with a combined value of over $300 million. He also has experience as the Chief Operating Officer of a European software company and as a sales manager at Caterpillar, Inc., where he worked for six years. Matt received his Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Illinois at Champaign - Urbana and his Masters of Business Administration from the University of Chicago.
 
Melissa Pielet, age 52, is the Principal - Finance at GK Development. Melissa arranges financing for all of GK Development’s acquisitions and developments. She procures first mortgage debt, mezzanine debt and preferred equity for GK Development’s portfolio. This includes construction loans, bridge loans and permanent loans. She is also responsible for ongoing communication with lenders on all GK-owned assets. Before joining the GK Development team, Melissa was a Principal and Executive Vice President of finance for 26 years with HSA Commercial. There she was responsible for financing the development and acquisition of over 67 million square feet of real estate with a market value of over $2.5 billion. This included industrial, commercial, office, medical office, senior living, hotels and vacant land. During her tenure at HSA, Melissa oversaw communication with lenders for all ongoing needs related to HSA Commercial’s 16 million square feet of owned assets, including negotiation various loan restructures to benefit ownership. She also arranged financing for various third party borrowers, including all of GK Development’s acquisitions and developments. Melissa attended the University of Wisconsin, studying real estate and marketing. She is a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) and is licensed as a real estate broker in the state of Illinois.
 
Colin Hartzell, age 37, is the Vice President of Financial Planning and Control of our Manager. Colin joined our Manager in June 2018 bringing over 14 years of experience including corporate finance leadership and accounting experience in the real estate industry. Prior to joining our Manager, Colin was with GGP, Inc. since September 2009, a publicly traded retail real estate company based in Chicago, Illinois, most recently serving as Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis. Colin reported to senior management on analysis of current and past trends in key performance indicators, reviewed key financial and operational metrics and forecasts, and liaised with senior leadership, stakeholders, and financial teams to ensure the company’s support structure is driving the business forward with minimal expenditures. Prior to GGP, Inc., Colin was with Huron Consulting Group (May 2007 – November 2008), Equity Office Properties (March 2005 – May 2007), and Deloitte (February 2004 – March 2005). Colin received a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Valparaiso.
  
Directors
 
Garo Kholamian is the sole shareholder and director of GK Development.
 
 
61
 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
Our company does not have executives. It is operated by a sole manager, GK Development. We will not reimburse our manager for any portion of the salaries and benefits to be paid to its executive officers named in “Directors and Executive Officers.” See “Compensation of our manager and its Affiliates” for a list of fees payable to GK Development and/or its affiliates.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
62
 
 
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
 
Forced Sale Agreements
 
In order to comply with the Equity-Bond Ratio, our company may, with the trustee’s reasonable approval, enter into Forced Sale Agreements with affiliates of GK Development.
 
We expect that any equity in a property that is subject to a Forced Sale Agreement may be financed using debt. We expect the terms of such debt to provide that the borrower will be in default if the ownership interest in the property, directly or indirectly, changes without lender consent. We expect that under terms of such loans, if the borrower is in default, the lender has the ability to accelerate the debt and charge certain penalties payable by the borrower. As a result, it may not be possible or it may be prohibitively expensive to sell the equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement without lender consent. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – The Effectiveness of our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement and call the loans of Lake Mead Crossing, 2700 Ygnacio and future acquired properties may be limited by covenants and penalties in debt documents for senior mortgages secured by the respective underlying properties” and “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement may be limited due to covenants contained in the senior and mezzanine debt secured by those properties” for more information.
 
The existing Cash Flow Loan Agreements and any future Forced Sale Agreements or Cash Flow Loan Agreements are not expected to limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders, or any other holder of equity subject to such an agreement, to sell their equity, nor do those agreements preclude a sale of the underlying real properties. In either circumstance, we would lose our rights to Cash Flow Loans relative to the interest sold, and the value of the interest sold would no longer be available to support the Equity-Bond Ratio or the repayment of the Bonds in the event the trustee exercised its rights under the Forced Sale Agreements. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Neither any future Forced Sale Agreements nor any current or future Cash Flow Loan Agreements limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders to sell their indirect equity in Lakeview Square, Ridgmar, or any equity subject to a future Forced Sale Agreement or Cash Flow Loan to an unaffiliated third party, nor do they preclude the sale of the underlying real properties” for more information.
 
We may enter into Forced Sale Agreements with affiliates. If we do, we anticipate the terms of the Forced Sale Agreements to be substantially similar to the expired Forced Sale Agreements related to Ridgmar and Lakeview Square, which were filed as exhibits to our Current Report on Form 1-U, filed with the SEC on October 6, 2016. As a result, the risks associated with the Forced Sale Agreements are expected to include, but not be limited to (i) the inability to effectively sell the affected equity due to restrictions contained in the underlying senior and mezzanine debt documents, (ii) the ability of the property owner to sell the property without the consent of the trustee, and (iii) the ability of the holder of the affected equity to sell the affected equity without the consent of the trustee.
 
Cash Flow Loans
 
Our company has entered into loan agreements with the Lakeview Lenders and the Ridgmar Lender, whereby the Cash Flow Lenders are obligated to advance our company up to the entirety of the monthly cash flow to them from their indirect ownership interest in Lakeview Square or Ridgmar, respectively, in order to enable our company to meet the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant. Any such advances will be represented by a promissory note, subordinate to the Bonds, that will bear interest at the then in effect IRS impute interest rate and will have the same maturity date as the Bonds. We will be required to represent to the Cash Flow Lenders that we require such a loan in order to comply with the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant in order to receive such a loan. The source of the Cash Flow Loans will be the distributions to the Cash Flow Lenders resulting in their indirect ownership interest in the underlying real property. Prior to the Cash Flow Loans’ maturity date, our company may, but is not required, to make payments on the Cash Flow Loans at its discretion. At its discretion, our company may enter into substantial similar arrangements with other affiliates of GK Development in order to provide cash to our company to ensure compliance with the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant; provided, that the repayment of any loan from an affiliate of GK Development to our company shall be subordinate to the Bonds.
 
 
63
 
 
The Cash Flow Loan Agreements do not limit the rights of the holders of such equity to sell their equity, nor do those agreements preclude a sale of the underlying real properties. If this were to occur, we would lose our rights to the cash flow loans relative to the interest sold. See “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Neither the Forced Sale Agreements nor the Cash Flow Loan Agreements limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders to sell their indirect equity in Lakeview Square, Ridgmar, or any other equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement or a Cash Flow Loan to an unaffiliated third party, nor do they preclude the sale of the underlying real properties.” for more information.
 
Mezzanine Debt
 
Lake Mead Parent, LLC, the owner of Lake Mead Partners, LLC and the wholly-owned subsidiary of our company, and Lake Mead Development, LLC received mezzanine debt to purchase Lake Mead Crossing from an affiliate of our manager. Under the promissory note, Lake Mead Parent, LLC and Lake Mead Development, LLC can borrow up to $10,500,000 at 8% interest. The mezzanine loan requires monthly interest payments only. The loan matures on November 12, 2018. The mezzanine loan had an outstanding principal of approximately $6,417,483 as of the date of this offering circular. We believe the terms of the current loan are, and any future loans from an affiliate of our manager will be, fair and at market rates for such loans. However, we cannot assure you that a third party unaffiliated with GK Development would not be willing to provide current loan financing on better terms.
 
Interim Debt
 
Lake Mead Partners, LLC received an interim loan from our manager in the amount of $2,608,100 in connection with our acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing. The interim loan carried interest of 7% until called by our manager. This loan has been repaid.
 
Lake Mead Development, LLC received an interim loan from our manager in the amount of $20,000 in connection with our acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing. The interim loan carried interest of 7% until called by our manager. This loan has been repaid.
 
2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC received an interim loan from our manager in the amount of $2,305,000 in connection with our acquisition of 2700 Ygnacio. The interim loan carried interest of 7%. This loan has been repaid.
 
See “Selection, Retention and Custody of Company’s Investments” and “Policies in Respect to Certain Transactions” for more information on related party transactions.
 
 
64
 
 
SELECTION, RETENTION AND CUSTODY OF COMPANY’S INVESTMENTS
 
GK Development, our company’s manager, or its affiliates will be responsible for all aspects of the management of our company’s assets. Through this management, GK Development or its affiliates will be entitled to the fees enumerated below:
 
Acquisition Fees. GK Development will be entitled to 2% of the purchase price of each property purchased from non-affiliated, third party sellers for identifying, reviewing, evaluating, investing in and the purchase of real property acquisitions. These acquisition fees are payable by our company regardless of whether the property ever generates positive cash flow.
 
Property Management Services Fee. Each property owned by our company will be managed by a property manager, which may be GK Development or an affiliate of GK Development. For its services, the property manager will be paid property management fees, leasing compensation and other compensation, provided that property management fees for any property may not exceed 5% of annual gross revenues from that property. The property management fees will be paid in arrears on a monthly basis. The property management fees are payable by our company regardless of whether the property ever generates positive cash flow.
 
Disposition Fees. GK Development will receive 2% of the gross sale price from the disposition of each property by our company. These disposition fees are payable by our company regardless of whether the investment is sold at a gain or a loss.
 
Financing Fees. GK Development will be entitled to 2% of the principal amount of any financing in conjunction with the purchase or refinance of an asset. These financing fees are payable by our company regardless of whether the asset generates positive cash flow.
 
Other Fees. GK Development may be entitled to certain additional, reasonable fees in association with other activities imperative to the operations of our company. Such activities include, but are not limited to, property leasing, property development, and loan guarantees. GK Development will endeavor to determine such fees based upon benchmark market rates.
 

 
65
 
 
  POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
 
Conflicts Generally
 
GK Development has not established any formal procedures to resolve the conflicts of interest discussed below. Bondholders, therefore, will be dependent on the good faith of the respective parties to resolve conflicts equitably. Although GK Development will attempt to monitor these conflicts, it will be extremely difficult if not impossible to assure that these conflicts do not arise, and may, in certain circumstances, result in adverse consequences to our company.
 
Specific Conflicts Inherent in our Company
 
As described below, certain conflicts of interest are inherent in an investment in our company. By investing in this offering, each Bondholder will be deemed to have consented to these conflicts and to have agreed not to assert any claim that any such conflicts violate any duty owed by GK Development, our manager, or its affiliates to the Bondholders, except to the extent that such conflict results in liability under the Securities Act. These conflicts include those inherent to the business relationship between our company and GK Development described in the preceding section. See “Selection, Retention and Custody of Company’s Investments” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” for more information.
 
Property Purchased from GK Development and their Affiliates. Our company may acquire properties, or an interest therein, from GK Development, and/or its affiliates. These properties, or interests therein, may be acquired in exchange for any combination of cash, debt and/or equity in our company. GK Development, or their affiliates, may derive a profit as a result of these acquisition transactions.
 
Other Activities. GK Development and its shareholder, director, officers and employees are not required to devote their full time to the business of our company, and GK Development and its shareholder, director, officers and employees may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time between our company and other activities of GK Development. However, GK Development is required to spend such time as is reasonably needed for the operations of our company and as is consistent with the due care that a fiduciary would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims. GK Development believes that it has sufficient staff to be fully capable of discharging its responsibilities to our company. GK Development and its respective affiliates may have other business interests or may engage in other business ventures of any nature or description whatsoever, whether presently existing or created later, and whether or not competitive with the business of our company or its affiliates. GK Development will have no right (including without limitation a right of first opportunity, first offer or first refusal with respect to any real estate investment presented to GK Development or any of their respective affiliates) by virtue of its participation in our company in or to such ventures or activities or to the income or profits derived from them. To the extent GK Development or its affiliates already have an ownership interest in an existing property in a market in which our company intends to acquire property, such other property may be in competition with our company’s investment for prospective tenants. Further, GK Development will have sole discretion to determine which among its affiliate’s sponsored programs should purchase any particular property or make any other investment, or enter into a joint venture for the acquisition and operation of specific properties.
 
Co-Investments. GK Development has the right, in its sole discretion, to determine whether it or any of its affiliates may co-invest with our company with respect to any particular property investment.
 
Loans. Our company purchased Lake Mead Crossing by utilizing debt financing directly from our manager and from an affiliate of our manager. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” for more information. We are not restricted from obtaining future debt financing from our manager or an affiliate of our manager. While we believe these loans are, and any future loans will be, fair and at market rates consistent with such loans, the terms of any such financing were not, and will not be, negotiated at arm’s length.
 
No Separate Representation of Bondholders by Counsel to our Company. Legal counsel for our company does not represent the Bondholders in connection with the organization or business of our company or this offering, and such counsel disclaims any fiduciary or attorney-client relationship with the Bondholders. Prospective investors should obtain the advice of their own legal counsel regarding legal matters.
 
 
66
 

COMPENSATION OF OUR MANAGER AND ITS AFFILIATES
 
The following is a description of compensation that may be received by GK Development and its affiliates from our company or in connection with the proceeds of this offering. These compensation arrangements have been established by GK Development and its affiliates and are not the result of arm’s-length negotiations. Services for which our company engages GK Development or its affiliates and which are not described below will be compensated at the market rate. Fees payable to GK Development or its affiliates in excess of the rate set forth in this section entitled “Compensation of our Manager and Its Affiliates” will require the consent of a majority of the Bonds. For this purpose, a Bondholder will be deemed to have consented with respect to its Bonds if he has not objected in writing within five (5) calendar days after the receipt of the consent request. GK Development or an affiliate may elect to waive or defer certain of these fees in its sole discretion. This table assumes that the maximum offering amount of $50,000,000 is sold in this offering.
 
Form of Compensation
 
Description
 
Estimated Amount of Compensation
 
 
 
 
 
Offering and Organization Stage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Organization and Offering Expenses:
 
GK Development will be reimbursed for organization and offering expenses.
 
$275,000
 
 
 
 
 
Promotional Fee:
 
GK Development will be paid a promotional fee for organizing and structuring the offering equal to 1.88% of the offering proceeds.
 
$940,000
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Stage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property Management Services Fee:
 
In connection with the provision of property management services, GK Development, will receive an annual property management fee, of up to 5.0% of the monthly gross income from any property it manages. The property management fee will be paid in arrears on a monthly basis.
 
Impractical to determine at this time(1)
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition Fee:
 
GK Development will be entitled to 2% of the purchase price of each property purchased from non-affiliated, third party sellers for identifying, reviewing, evaluating, investing in and the purchase of real property acquisitions. Our company does not anticipate acquiring any properties from non-affiliated, third party sellers in the twelve (12) months following the qualification of this offering, and, therefore, does not expect to pay any acquisition fees during that time period. However, our company has not yet entered any definitive agreements for the purchase of assets from affiliates.
 
Impractical to determine at this time
 
 
 
 
 
Financing Fee:
 
GK Development will be entitled to 2% of the principal amount of any financing in conjunction with purchase or refinance of an asset.(2)
 
Impractical to determine at this time
 
 
 
 
 
Disposition Fee:
 
GK Development will receive 2% of the gross sale price from the disposition of each property by our company.
 
Impractical to determine at this time
 
 
 
 
 
Reimbursement of Expenses:
 
GK Development will be reimbursed by our company for all costs incurred by GK Development and its affiliates when performing services on behalf of our company.
 
Impractical to determine at this time
 
 
 
 
 
Liquidation Stage:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reimbursement of Expenses:
 
GK Development will be reimbursed by our company for reasonable and necessary expenses paid or incurred by GK Development in the future in connection with the liquidation of our company, including any legal and accounting costs to be paid from operating revenue.
 
Impractical to determine at this time
 
In connection with our acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing from an unaffiliated, third party seller, our manager became entitled to $845,000 payable as an acquisition fee, representing 2% of the purchase price. In connection with our acquisition of 2700 Ygnacio from an unaffiliated, third party seller, our manager became entitled to $300,000 payable as an acquisition fee, representing 2% of the purchase price.
_____________
(1)
Although impractical to determine for future years, we received Property Management Services Fees of $25,855, and $112,918, and $229,570 in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively.
(2)
GK Development may employ third parties, both affiliated and unaffiliated, to assist in securing debt financing for our company. In such an event, GK Development may reallow all or a portion of the financing fee to such third party. In connection with our company’s acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing, GK Development reallowed 100% of the financing fee, $655,000, to M Capital Partners LLC, an unaffiliated, third party, and $170,600 to the mezzanine lender. In connection with our company's acquisition of 2700 Ygnacio, GK Development reallowed 100% of the financing fee, $226,500, to M Capital Partners LLC, an unaffiliated, third party.
 
 
67
 

PRIOR PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
 
Prior Investment Programs
 
The information presented in this section represents the historical experience of real estate programs sponsored by GK Development. These are all private programs as GK Development has sponsored no public programs other than our company. Investors in this offering should not assume that they will experience returns, if any, comparable to those experienced by investors in any of GK Development’s prior programs. Investors who purchase Bonds will not acquire any ownership interest in any of the programs discussed in this section.
 
The Prior Performance Tables set forth information as of December 31, 2017 regarding certain of these prior programs regarding: (1) experience in raising and investing funds (Table I); (2) compensation to GK Development or its affiliates (separate and distinct from any return on its investment) (Table II); (3) annual operating results (Table III); and (4) results of completed programs (Table IV). Sales or disposals of properties (Table V) have been omitted because no transactions of this nature have been completed during the three years ended December 31, 2017 by programs with similar investment objectives. We will furnish copies of Table VI which shows acquisitions of properties by prior programs to any prospective investor upon request and without charge.
 
As of June 30, 2018, GK Development was the sponsor of nine private programs that had closed offerings in the prior ten years; none of which had investment objectives similar to our company (see Tables I, II and III). Of the seven prior private programs that closed offerings within the prior five years, we do not believe that any of them had similar investment objectives to our company because: (i) four of the programs were equity programs designed to invest in a single, identified asset and (ii) the remaining three programs were notes programs designed to make loans to identified affiliates of GK Development.
 
As of June 30, 2018, the nine private programs of which GK Development was sponsor had raised in the aggregate $174 million in equity and debt capital from a total of 1,991 total investors, and acquired a total of twenty-eight properties with an aggregate acquisition cost of approximately $650,000,000. Of these nine programs, none have been completed.
 
As a percentage of acquisition costs, the diversification of these properties by geographic area is as follows:
 
Geographic Area
 
%
 
 
 
 
 
Midwest
  51.6%
South
  33.3%
West
  15.1%
 
All of the properties acquired by GK Development’s prior programs are retail properties, which are commercial properties. Our manager ‘s prior programs have acquired no residential properties. Of the acquisitions of the prior programs, 2% were new properties or developed by an affiliate and 98% were used properties. Our manager’s prior programs described herein have sold an aggregate of two (2) properties.
 
Set forth below is a brief summary of each of the prior programs sponsored by GK Development in the prior ten years as of December 31, 2017.
 
InvestLinc GK Properties Fund II, LLC (“Fund II”)
 
Fund II was formed in March 2004 to invest in commercial real estate opportunities through investments in income producing real estate throughout the United States. Fund II raised $39,351,400 (393,514 units or $1,000 per unit) from accredited investors through a private placement offering. Fund II expired on December 31, 2017. Fund II’s portfolio consisted of a regional mall, Lufkin Mall, located in Lufkin, TX and a large open-air shopping center, Yorkshire Plaza, located in Aurora, IL. Fund II’s cash from operations was materially and adversely affected by the economic recession of 2008-2009, which resulted in significant financial hardship to the tenants of Fund II’s retail investments. As a result, Fund II had several tenants either go bankrupt or cease paying under their leases or require significant rent concessions to stay in their spaces. In order to preserve cash needed to meet Fund II’s debt service obligations and avoid default and foreclosure on Fund II’s properties, GK Development, as Fund II’s manager, determined it was in the best interest of Fund II to reduce distributions below Fund II’s targeted distribution amount. In March 2016, Fund II sold one Lufkin Mall for $30,250,000. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately $1,800,000. As of December 31, 2017, Fund II redeemed 84.43% of the investors. The amount paid to those interests was $5,398,242.48. Fund II sold Yorkshire Plaza on February 28, 2018 for $18,000,000. Fund II was closed in 2018 upon the $5,000,000 distribution to the remaining investors which included the gain on sale plus the cash in Fund II.

 
68
 
 
GK Properties Fund III, LLC (“Fund III”)
 
Fund III was formed in April 2006 to invest primarily in commercial real estate opportunities through investments in income producing real estate throughout the United States. Fund III raised $24,007,395 (2.4 million units) from accredited investors through a private placement offering. Fund III is scheduled to expire on April 20, 2019. Fund III’s portfolio consisted of College Square Mall Development, a property adjacent to College Square Mall, located in Cedar Falls, IA; and Peru Mall, a regional mall, located in Peru, IL. Fund III’s cash from operations was materially and adversely affected by the economic recession of 2008-2009, which resulted in significant financial hardship to the tenants of Fund III’s retail investments. As a result, Fund III had several tenants either go bankrupt or cease paying under their leases or require significant rent concessions to stay in their spaces. In order to preserve cash needed to meet Fund III’s debt service obligations and avoid default and foreclosure on Fund III’s properties, GK Development, as Fund III’s manager, determined it was in the best interest of Fund III to reduce distributions below Fund III’s targeted distribution amount. By retaining funds, the goal is to create value for investors over time, increasing the possibility of resuming distributions and maximizing returns for investors at the conclusion of Fund III. In February 2016 and April 2016, Fund III sold parcels of College Square Mall Development for $2,000,000 and $10,121,000, respectively. The sales resulted in a gain aggregating approximately $6,200,000. Through December 31, 2017, 59% of the investors were paid a final distribution of $3,317,505 and have been fully redeemed out of Fund III. In total, Fund III investors have received distributions of $7,321,646 ($3.01 per unit) as of December 31, 2017.
 
Grand Center Partners, LLC (“GCP”)
 
In March 2012, GCP raised $2,410,000 from accredited investors through a private placement offering for the purpose of making a preferred equity investment to fund the development of a retail shopping center known as The Shops at North Grand, located in Ames, IA. The property consisted of (i) 98,827 square feet of inline “big box” retail space leased to Kohl’s, The Gap Outlet, Shoe Carnival and TJ Maxx; (ii) two fully leased single tenant outparcel buildings totaling 5,613 square feet; (iii) an outparcel pad approximating 0.57 acres; and (iv) a multi-tenant outparcel building consisting of 8,731 square feet. The retail shopping center was sold in November 2013 and the investors received cash distributions aggregating $3,224,000. The projected liquidation for this investment was 2017; however, the investors received a return of their equity, plus a return on their equity in 2013.
 
GDH Investments, LLC (“GDH”)
 
 In September 2012, GDH raised $2,000,000 from accredited investors through a private placement offering for the purpose of making a preferred equity investment into GDH to fund the re-development of a neighborhood shopping center located in the Lincoln Park North/Sheffield/Clybourn retail corridor in Chicago, Illinois. The center consisted of 35,400 square feet of retail space and a 43-car underground parking facility. The property was sold in January 2014 and the investors received cash distributions of $3,123,000. The projected liquidation for this investment was 2017; however, the investors received a return of their equity, plus a return on their equity in 2014.
 
 GK Secured Income I, LLC (“GKSI I”)
 
GKSI I was formed in December 2012 to provide a loan to an entity affiliated with our manager of GKSI I. GKSI I raised $7,364,587 from accredited investors through a private placement offering. The investors are entitled to receive a return of 8% per annum payable monthly. Through December 31, 2017, $2,698,025 has been paid to its members, representing an 8% annual return from inception. To date, no sales of properties or capital events have occurred in GKSI I. GKSI I anticipates, but is not obligated, to liquidate within five to seven years of the termination of its offering, December 2017. Therefore, GKSI I has not yet reached its anticipated liquidity event.

GK Preferred Income I (Lakeview Square), LLC (“GKPI I”)
 
GKPI I was formed in February 2013, to acquire, own and operate, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, a regional mall known as Lakeview Square Mall, located in Battle Creek, MI. Lakeview Square Mall consists of 551,228 square feet of retail space, of which 259,635 square feet is owned by GKPI I, with the remaining 291,593 square feet being owned by the following anchor tenants; Sears, JC Penney and Macy’s. GKPI I raised $5,177,239 of preferred equity from accredited investors through a private placement offering. The investors are entitled to receive a minimum preferred return of 7% per annum. As of March 31, 2015, all of the preferred equity ($5,177,239) has been returned to the investors, together with a 15% annualized preferred return. As of December 31, 2017, the investors have been fully redeemed out of the Fund.
 
 
69
 



GK Preferred Income II (Ridgmar), LLC (“GKPI II”)
 
GKPI II was formed in August 2013, to acquire and own, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, an 87.50% Tenant-in-Common (“TIC”) interest in a regional mall known as Ridgmar Mall, located in Ft. Worth, TX. The remaining TIC interest is held by an affiliate of the sponsor. Ridgmar Mall consists of 1,235,515 square feet of retail space, of which 398,840 square feet is owned by the TIC, with the remaining 836,675 square feet being owned by the following anchor tenants: Dillard’s, Macy’s, Neiman Marcus, Sears, and JC Penney. During 2013 and 2014, GKPI II raised $23,864,440 of preferred equity from accredited investors through a private placement offering. The investors are entitled to receive a preferred equity return of 7% per annum. Through December 31, 2017, $5,055,032 has been paid to its members, representing a 7% preferred return. GKPI II has ceased distributions in 2017 due to the several tenants either going bankrupt or cease paying under their leases or require significant rent concessions to stay in their spaces. Out of the five anchors tenants above, three (Neiman Marcus, Sears, JC Penney) have vacated the mall, which has triggered co-tenancy clauses with other tenants. As a result, GKPI II has had a significant reduction to NOI. GKPI II is in negotiations with the bank on a redevelopment plan to revitalize Ridgmar Mall. To date, no sales of properties or capital events have occurred in GKPI II. GKPI II anticipates, but is not obligated, to liquidate within five to seven years of the termination of its offering, August 2018. Therefore, GKPI II has not yet reached its anticipated liquidity event.
 
GK Secured Income Investments III, LLC (“GKSI III”)
 
GKSI III was formed in October 2014 to provide loans to Fund I and to Peru GKD Partners, LLC (“Peru”) on a 50/50 basis. Peru is owned by Fund III. Both Fund I and Fund II are affiliated with our manager of GKSI III. Through December 31, 2015, GKSI III raised $11,111,776 from accredited investors through a private placement offering. The members are entitled to receive a preferred return of 9% per annum payable monthly. Through December 31, 2017, $2,764,861 has been paid to investors, representing a 9% annual return. To date, no sales of properties or capital events have occurred in GKSI III. GKSI III anticipates, but is not obligated, to liquidate within five to seven years of the termination of its offering, October 2017. Therefore, GKSI III has not yet reached its anticipated liquidity event.
 
GK Secured Income IV, LLC (“GKSI IV”)
 
GKSI IV was formed in September 2015 to provide loans in the aggregate of $10,000,000 to Lake Mead Partners, LLC, which loans were to be secured by our company pledging all of its equity interest in Lake Mead Partners, LLC. Through December 31, 2015, GKSI IV raised $10,779,000 from accredited investors through a private placement offering. In the first year, the members are entitled to receive a preferred return of 7% per annum. Through December 31, 2017, $1,625,453 has been paid to investors, representing a 7% annual return. To date, no sales of properties or capital events have occurred in GKSI IV. GKSI IV anticipates, but is not obligated, to liquidate within five to seven years of the termination of its offering, November 2018. Therefore, GKSI IV has not yet reached its anticipated liquidity event.
 
GK Preferred Income III (Lufkin), LLC (“GKPI III”)
 
GKPI III was formed on April 2, 2015, to acquire, own and operate, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, a regional mall known as Lufkin Mall, located in Lufkin Texas. Lufkin Mall consists of 371,309 square feet of total space, of which approximately 348,468 square feet is owned by GKPI III, with the remaining 22,841 square feet being owned by Boot Barn. GKPI III raised $9,835,745 of preferred equity from accredited investors through a private placement offering. The investors are entitled to receive a minimum preferred return of 7% per annum. Through December 31, 2017, $1,296,929 has been paid to its members, representing a 7% annual preferred return from inception. To date, no sales of properties or capital events have occurred in GKPI III. GKPI III anticipate, but is not obligated, to liquidate within five to seven years of the termination of its offering April 2020. Therefore, GKPI III has not reached its anticipated liquidity event.
 
 GK DST - Cedar Falls Grocery, LLC
 
GK DST – Cedar Falls Grocery was formed on April 5, 2016, to acquire through a Section 1031 exchange to acquire, own and operate, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, a one tenant Hy-Vee grocery store, located in Cedar Falls Iowa. The Hy-Vee Grocery Store consists of 105,817 square feet. GK DST – Cedar Falls Grocery raised $5,076,122 of funding from accredited investors through a private placement offering. The investors are entitled to receive a minimum preferred return of 6% per annum. Through December 31, 2017, $483,125 has been paid to its members, representing a 6% annual preferred return from inception. To date, no sales of properties or capital events have occurred in GK DST – Cedar Falls Grocery. GK DST – Cedar Falls Grocery anticipate, but is not obligated, to liquidate within ten years of the termination coterminous with the first mortgage financing April 2026. Therefore, GK DST – Cedar Falls Grocery has not reached its anticipated liquidity event.
 
 
70
 

  LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY
 
Our manager and executive officers, if any are appointed by our manager, will owe fiduciary duties to our company and our members in the manner prescribed in the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act and applicable case law. Neither our manager nor any executive officer will owe fiduciary duties to our bondholders. Our manager is required to act in good faith and in a manner that it determines to be in our best interests. However, nothing in our Operating Agreement precludes our manager or executive officers or any affiliate of our manager or any of their respective officers, directors, employees, members or trustees from acting, as a director, officer or employee of any corporation, a trustee of any trust, an executor or administrator of any estate, a member of any company or an administrative official of any other business entity, or from receiving any compensation or participating in any profits in connection with any of the foregoing, and neither our company nor any member shall have any right to participate in any manner in any profits or income earned or derived by our manager or any affiliate thereof or any of their respective officers, directors, employees, members or trustees, from or in connection with the conduct of any such other business venture or activity. Our manager, its executive officers, any affiliate of any of them, or any shareholder, officer, director, employee, partner, member or any person or entity owning an interest therein, may engage in or possess an interest in any other business or venture of any nature or description, provided that such activities do not compete with the business of our company or otherwise breach their agreements with our company; and no member or other person or entity shall have any interest in such other business or venture by reason of its interest in our company.
 
Our manager or executive officers have no liability to our company or to any member for any claims, costs, expenses, damages, or losses suffered by our company which arise out of any action or inaction of any manager or executive officer if such manager or executive officer meets the following standards: (i) such manager or executive officer, in good faith, reasonably determined that such course of conduct or omission was in, or not opposed to, the best interests of our company, and (ii) such course of conduct did not constitute fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence or any breach of fiduciary duty to our company or its members. These exculpation provisions in our Operating Agreement are intended to protect our manager and executive officers from liability when exercising their business judgment regarding transactions we may enter into.
 
Insofar as the foregoing provisions permit indemnification or exculpation of our manager, executive officers or other persons controlling us from liability arising under the Securities Act, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC this indemnification and exculpation is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
 
 
71
 

EXPERTS
 
The consolidated financial statements of our company as of December 31, 2016 and 2017, which comprise the balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2017 and the related statements of operations, members’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements and the Statement of Revenues and Certain Direct Operating Expenses of 2700 Ygnacio for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 included in this Offering Circular and the related notes to those financial statements, have been audited by Eide Bailly LLP, an independent public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing elsewhere herein, and upon authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
 
72
 

LEGAL MATTERS
 
Certain legal matters in connection with this offering, including the validity of the Bonds, will be passed upon for us by Kaplan Voekler Cunningham & Frank, PLC.
 
 
73
 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
 
We maintain a website, www.gkdevelopment.com, which contains additional information concerning GK Development and our company. Our company will file, annual, semi-annual and special reports, and other information, as applicable, with the SEC. You may read and copy any document filed with the SEC at the SEC’s public Company reference room at Room 1580, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. The SEC also maintains a web site that contains reports, and informational statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC (http://www.sec.gov).
 
Our company has filed an Offering Statement of which this Offering Circular is a part with the SEC under the Securities Act. The Offering Statement contains additional information about us. You may inspect the Offering Statement without charge at the office of the SEC at Room 1580, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, and you may obtain copies from the SEC at prescribed rates.
 
This Offering Circular does not contain all of the information included in the Offering Statement. We have omitted certain parts of the Offering Statement in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information, we refer you to the Offering Statement, which may be found at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Statements contained in this Offering Circular and any accompanying supplement about the provisions or contents of any contract, agreement or any other document referred to are not necessarily complete. Please refer to the actual exhibit for a more complete description of the matters involved.
 
 
74
 

PART F/S
 
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
 
 
 
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
F-1
 
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
 
F-2
 
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information
 
F-3
 
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
F-4
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
 
F-5
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
 
F-6
 
Consolidated Statements of Members’ Equity (Unaudited)
 
F-7
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow (Unaudited)
 
F-8
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
F-10
 
Financial Statements for Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
 
F-25
 
Independent Auditor’s Report
 
F-25
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
F-26
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations
 
F-27
 
Consolidated Statements of Members’ Equity
 
F-28
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
F-29
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
F-31
 
 
 
 
 
2700 Ygnacio
 
 
 
Statement of Revenues and Certain Operating Expenses for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
F-46
 
Independent Auditor’s Report
 
F-46
 
Statement of Revenues and Certain Operating Expenses
 
F-47
 
Notes to Financial Statements
 
F-48
 
 
 
 

 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)
 
Pro Forma Financial Information
December 31, 2017
 
 
 
F-1
 
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2017
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017
 
 
Estimated Statement of Operations for 2700 Ygnacio for the Period January 1, 2017 through January 29, 2017
 
 
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations for the period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Minimum rents
 $5,613,107 
 $200,048 
 $5,813,155 
Tenant recoveries
  459,198 
  3,477 
  462,675 
 
  6,072,305 
  203,525 
  6,275,830 
 
    
    
    
Operating Expenses
    
    
    
Other operating expenses
  1,149,276 
  51,890 
  1,201,166 
Insurance
  93,107 
  3,351 
  96,458 
Management fees
  229,570 
  9,259 
  238,829 
Professional fees
  141,785 
  1,815 
  143,600 
Real estate taxes
  358,111 
  14,599 
  372,710 
Depreciation and amortization
  3,399,954 
  125,898 
  3,525,852 
 
  5,371,803 
  206,812 
  5,578,615 
 
    
    
    
Other Income and Expense
    
    
    
Interest income
  90 
  - 
  90 
Interest Expense
  (3,238,256)
  (49,834)
  -3,288,090 
Miscellaneous income
  13,374 
  - 
  13,374 
Gain on sale of rental property
  1,738,882 
  - 
  1,738,882 
 
  (1,485,910)
  (49,834)
  (1,535,744)
 
    
    
    
Consolidated Net Income/(Loss)
 $(785,408)
 $(53,121)
 $(838,529)
 
See Accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information
 
 
F-2
 

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
 
On January 30, 2017, GK Investment Holdings, LLC (“Applicant”), through its wholly owned limited liability company 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC, purchased a Class A office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California (“2700 Ygnacio") from an unrelated third-party seller (“Predecessor”). 2700 Ygnacio is comprised of 107,970 rentable square feet and all management and ownership responsibilities was assumed as of January 30, 2017.
 
The unaudited consolidated pro forma statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as adjusted, gives effect to the acquisition of 2700 Ygnacio as if the acquisition had occurred on December 31, 2016. Additionally, the unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2017 is based on combining the Applicants consolidated statement of operations for the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 with the estimated statement of operations of 2700 Ygnacio for the period January 1, 2017 through January 29, 2017.
 
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Estimates - The preparation of this financial statement in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the amounts reported in the financial statement and related notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Rental Recognition – The Property’s leases with tenants are classified as operating leases. Rental income is recognized ratably over the term of the respective leases, inclusive of leases which provide for scheduled rent increases and rental concessions. Straight line rent adjustment included in minimum rents, reflected an increase in rental revenue on the statement of revenue and certain direct operating expenses in the amount of $147,579 for the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.
 
Reimbursements from Tenants - During the term of their respective leases, certain of the tenants pay a pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses (as defined), over a base year. Estimated recoveries are recognized as revenue in the period the applicable expenses are incurred.
 
 
F-3
 

GK Investment Holdings, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)
 
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
 
F-4
 

GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
 
 
 
(Unaudited)
June 30,
2018
 
 
December 31,
2017
 
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental properties
 $55,753,225 
 $55,431,830 
Less: Accumulated depreciation
  3,356,877 
  2,700,819 
 
  52,396,348 
  52,731,011 
 
    
    
Cash
  1,569,096 
  788,301 
Accounts receivable - tenants
  59,206 
  72,759 
Deferred rent receivable
  205,899 
  189,884 
Deferred leasing costs - Net
  657,071 
  772,220 
Lease intangibles - Net
  2,550,471 
  3,397,992 
Restricted cash - funded reserves
  687,829 
  977,453 
Other assets
  113,588 
  124,197 
 
    
    
Total assets
 $58,239,508 
 $59,053,817 
 
    
    
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
    
    
 
    
    
LIABILITIES
    
    
Notes payable - Net
 $44,514,637 
 $48,432,954 
Bonds payable - Net
  10,901,729 
  6,508,198 
Accrued financing fees payable
  199,570 
  199,570 
Accounts payable
  9,751 
  - 
Deferred rent
  141,474 
  110,425 
Lease intangibles - Net
  1,750,460 
  1,958,035 
Accrued interest
  180,140 
  185,765 
Other accrued liabilities
  76,936 
  98,504 
Due to affiliates
  24,717 
  25,857 
Tenant security deposits
  121,746 
  122,803 
Total liabilities
  57,921,160 
  57,642,111 
 
    
    
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 7 and 8)
    
    
 
    
    
Members' Equity
    
    
Members' Equity
  318,348 
  1,411,706 
 
    
    
 
 $58,239,508 
 $59,053,817 
 
 
 
F-5
 

GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ending June 30, 2018 and 2017
 
 
 
2018
 
 
2017
 
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
Minimum rents
 $2,698,683 
 $2,708,999 
Tenant recoveries
  206,442 
  251,628 
 
  2,905,125 
  2,960,627 
 
    
    
 
    
    
Operating Expenses
    
    
Operating expenses
  517,509 
  562,250 
Insurance
  52,523 
  40,776 
Management fees
  108,522 
  107,454 
Professional fees
  38,914 
  44,687 
Real estate taxes
  187,375 
  197,712 
Depreciation and amortization
  1,441,872 
  1,666,130 
 
  2,346,715 
  2,619,009 
 
    
    
Other Income and (Expense)
    
    
Interest income
  196 
  11 
Interest expense
  (1,658,484)
  (1,615,817)
Miscellaneous income
  6,520 
  3,305 
Gain on sale of rental property
  - 
  1,738,882 
 
  (1,651,768)
  126,381 
 
    
    
Consolidated Net (Loss)/Income
 $(1,093,358)
 $467,999 
 
In the opinion of management all adjustments necessary in order to make interim financial statements not misleading have been included.
 
 
F-6
 

GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity (Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ending June 30, 2018 and for the Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
 
 
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ending
June 30,
2018
 
 
December 31,
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance - Beginning of Period
 $1,411,706 
 $2,197,114 
 
    
    
Consolidated Net (Loss)
  (1,093,358)
  (785,408)
 
    
    
Balance - End of Period
 $318,348 
 $1,411,706 

 
F-7
 
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ending June 30, 2018 and 2017
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
 
2018
 
 
 (Restated)
2017
 
Consolidated Net Income/(Loss)
 $(1,093,358)
 $467,999 
 
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
    
Depreciation and amortization
  1,441,872 
  1,666,130 
Amortization of above-market leases
  200,961 
  193,891 
Accretion of below-market leases
  (207,575)
  (233,516)
Deferred rent receivable
  (16,015)
  (57,499)
Gain on sale of rental property
  - 
  (1,738,882)
Amortization of debt issuance costs
  106,394 
  115,865 
Amortization of bond issuance and bond discount costs
  84,015 
  25,661 
Changes in:
    
    
Accounts receivable - tenants
  13,553 
  39,132 
Other receivables - tenant
  - 
  75,969 
Other assets
  10,609 
  (82,853)
Accounts payable
  9,751 
  62,234 
Deferred rent
  31,049 
  109,778 
Accrued interest
  (5,625)
  37,351 
Other accrued liabilities
  (21,568)
  13,264 
Due to affiliates
  (1,140)
  101,072 
Tenant security deposits
  (1,057)
  82,694 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  551,866 
  878,290 
 
    
    
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
    
    
Acquisition of rental property
  - 
  (14,905,290)
Acquisition costs incurred
  - 
  (369,573)
Additions to rental properties
  (321,395)
  (66,383)
Net proceeds from sale of rental property
  - 
  3,618,905 
Payments of deferred leasing commissions
  (24,107)
  (107,161)
Deposits for acquisition of rental property
  - 
  1,005,000 
Net cash (used in) investing activities
  (345,502)
  (10,824,502)
 
 
 
F-8
 

GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ending June 30, 2018 and 2017
 
 
    
 
 (Continued)
 
 
 
(Continued)
2018
 
 
Restated
2017
 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from notes payable
 $- 
 $12,775,000 
Repayment of related party/notes payable
  (3,515,000)
  (5,319,000)
Principal payment on notes payable
  (509,708)
  (466,887)
Payment of financing costs
  - 
  (160,012)
Proceeds from bonds payable
  4,835,000 
  3,364,000 
Payment of bond issue costs
  (525,485)
  (318,697)
Net cash provided by financing activities
  284,807 
  9,874,404 
 
    
    
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash and Restricted Cash
  491,171 
  (71,808)
 
    
    
Cash and Restricted Cash - Beginning of period
  1,765,754 
  1,328,801 
 
    
    
Cash and Restricted Cash - End of period
 $2,256,925 
 $1,256,993 
 
    
    
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
    
    
Cash paid for interest
 $1,473,700 
 $1,436,940 
 
    
    
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
    
    
 
    
    
Financing fees accrued and not paid
 $- 
 $161,500 
 
    
    
Acquisition costs accrued and not paid
 $- 
 $20,000 
 
 
 
 
F-9
 

Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Description of Business - On September 14, 2015, GK Investment Holdings, LLC (“GKIH” and/or the “Company”), a Delaware limited liability company was formed with the intent to acquire existing income producing commercial rental properties for the purpose of holding and operating such properties, and if the need arises, to redevelop the rental properties for an alternative use other than intended when originally acquired. However, GKIH is permitted to transact in any lawful business in addition to that stated above. GKIH anticipates funding acquisitions in part, by offering to investors the opportunity to purchase up to a maximum of $50,000,000 of Bonds of which $11,948,000 and $7,133,000 was sold as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively (Note 8). The Bonds are unsecured indebtedness of GKIH.
 
The members of GKIH have limited liability. Pursuant to the terms of the Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (the “Agreement”), the Company will exist in perpetuity unless terminated as defined in the Agreement. The Company is managed by GK Development, Inc. (the “Manager” and “Sponsor of the bonds”), an affiliate of one of the members of GKIH.
 
On October 22, 2015, Lake Mead Parent, LLC (“LM Parent”) and Lake Mead Development, LLC (“LM Development”), both Delaware limited liability companies were formed and on October 22, 2015, Lake Mead Partners, LLC (“LM Partners”), a Delaware limited liability company was formed and 100% of LM Partners is owned by LM Parent. On October 21, 2016, 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC (“Ygnacio”), a Delaware limited liability company was formed. LM Parent, LM Development and Ygnacio are 100% owned by GKIH.
 
The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as of June 30, 2018, are as follows:
 
LM Parent – 100% owned by GKIH; owns 100% of LM Partners;
 
LM Development – 100% owned by GKIH;
 
Ygnacio – 100% owned by GKIH.
 
LM Partners and LM Development were formed to acquire, own, and operate a retail power center known as Lake Mead Crossing, located in Henderson, Nevada ("Lake Mead Crossings"). Lake Mead Crossings was purchased on November 12, 2015. Prior to the purchase of Lake Mead Crossings, GKIH had no activity. Ygnacio was formed to acquire a three-story Class A office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California. Ygnacio was purchased on January 30, 2017.
 
The acquisition of Lake Mead Crossings was financed as follows:
 
LM Parent - (i) a first mortgage loan in the maximum amount of $30,000,000, of which $29,500,000 was funded upon acquisition; (ii) a mezzanine loan, in the maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Partners and LM Development, of which $7,210,298 was funded to LM Partners upon acquisition and (iii) an interim loan from GK Development, Inc. of which $2,608,100 was funded upon acquisition.
 
LM Development - (i) a first mortgage loan in the original amount of $2,700,000; (ii) a mezzanine loan, in the maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Partners and LM Development, of which $339,702 was funded to LM Development upon acquisition and (iii) an interim loan from GK Development, Inc. of which $20,000 was funded upon acquisition.
 
The acquisition of Ygnacio was financed with (i) bond proceeds in the amount of $1,750,000; (ii) a first mortgage loan in the maximum amount of $11,325,000, of which $500,000 was retained by the lender to establish a funded reserve for tenant improvements/lease commissions; and (iii) an interim loan from GK Development, Inc. of which $2,305,000 was funded upon acquisition.
 
Allocation of Profits and Losses - Profits or losses from operations of the Company are allocated to the members of GKIH in their ownership percentages. Gains and losses from the sale, exchange, or other disposition of Company property are allocated to the members of GKIH in their ownership percentages.
 
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.
 
Basis of Accounting - The Company maintains its accounting records and prepares its consolidated financial statements on an accrual basis, which is in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).
 
Classification of Assets and Liabilities - The financial affairs of the Company generally do not involve a business cycle since the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities are usually dependent on the Company’s circumstances. Accordingly, the classification of current assets and current liabilities is not considered appropriate and has been omitted from the consolidated balance sheets.
 
 
F-10
 
 
Estimates - The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments -Our financial instruments consist of cash, funded reserves, short-term trade receivables, notes payable and bonds payable. The carrying values of cash, funded reserves, and short-term receivables approximate their fair value due to their short-term maturities. The carrying value of the notes payable and bonds payable approximates their fair value based on interest rates currently obtainable.
 
Cash and Restricted Cash - The Company maintains cash and restricted cash balances in federally insured financial institutions that, from time to time, exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits. The Company believes that they are not exposed to any significant credit risk on its cash and restricted cash. Restricted cash consists of tenant improvement/lease commission reserves and bond service reserves.
 
Revenue and Gain Recognition - On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), (“Topic 606”) using the modified retrospective method applying it to any open contracts as of January 1, 2018, for which the Company did not identify any open contracts. The Company also utilized the practical expedient for which the Company was not required to restate revenue from contracts that began and are completed within the same annual reporting period. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018, are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Revenue Recognition (Topic 605). The new guidance provides a unified model to determine how revenue is recognized. To determine the proper amount of revenue to be recognized, the Company performs the following steps: (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations within the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) a performance obligation is satisfied. As of June 30, 2018, the Company had no outstanding contract assets or contract liabilities. The adoption of this standard did not result in any material changes to the Company’s revenue recognition as compared to the previous guidance.
 
Revenues from rental properties - Revenues from rental properties are comprised of minimum base rent, percentage rent, lease termination fee income, amortization of above-market and below-market rent adjustments and straight-line rent adjustments. Base rental revenues from rental properties are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases. Certain of these leases also provide for percentage rents based upon the level of sales achieved by the lessee.  These percentage rents are recognized once the required sales level is achieved.  Rental income may also include payments received in connection with lease termination agreements.  Lease termination fee income is recognized when the lessee provides consideration in order to terminate a lease agreement in place. The performance obligation of the Company is the termination of the lease agreement which occurs upon consideration received and execution of the termination agreement. Upon acquisition of real estate operating properties, the Company estimates the fair value of identified intangible assets and liabilities (including above-market and below-market leases, where applicable). The capitalized above-market or below-market intangible is amortized to rental income over the estimated remaining term of the respective leases, which includes the expected renewal option period for below-market leases.
 
Impairment of Assets - The Company reviews the recoverability of long-lived assets including buildings, equipment, and other intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on the ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from the expected future pretax cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such assets, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value. The measurement of impairment requires management to make estimates of these cash flows related to long lived assets, as well as other fair value determinations. The Company does not believe that there are any events or circumstances indicating impairment of its investments in the rental properties and related long lived assets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
 
Debt Issuance Costs - Debt issuance costs represent fees and other third-party costs associated with obtaining financing for the rental properties. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the respective loan agreements. Debt issuance costs are presented on the consolidated balance sheets as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability. Unamortized costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Amortization expense is included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Bond Issuance Costs and Bond Discounts - Bond issuance costs represent underwriting compensation and offering costs and expenses associated with selling the bonds. Bond discounts are a volume-weighted discount (three to five percent) dependent on how many bonds are purchased. Both of these costs are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the bonds. Bond issuance and bond discount costs are presented on the consolidated balance sheets as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the bond liability. Unamortized bond issue and bond discount costs will be expensed if the bonds are repaid before maturity (September 30, 2022). Amortization expense is included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Deferred Leasing Costs - Deferred leasing costs represent leasing commissions, legal fees and other third-party costs associated with obtaining tenants for the rental properties. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Amortization expense is included in depreciation and amortization expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Lease Intangible Assets and Liabilities - GAAP requires intangible assets and liabilities to be recognized apart from goodwill if they arise from contractual or other legal rights (regardless of whether those rights are transferrable or separable from the acquired entity or from other rights and obligations).
 
 
F-11
 
 
Upon the acquisition of both Lake Mead Crossings and Ygnacio (the “Properties”), the Company recorded above and below-market leases based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflected the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (a) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (b) the Company estimates of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. These assets and liabilities are being amortized or accreted on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the respective tenant leases and the amortization or accretion is being recorded as an adjustment to rental income, on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Upon the acquisition of the Properties, the Company estimated the value of acquired leasing commissions as the costs the Company would have incurred to lease the Properties to its occupancy level at the date each Property was acquired. Such estimate, which is included in lease intangibles on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, includes the fair value of leasing commissions, legal costs and other third-party costs that would be incurred to lease the Properties to the level at the date of the acquisition. Such costs are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the respective tenant leases and the amortization is being recorded in depreciation and amortization expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Additionally, the Company estimated the value of acquired in-place lease costs as the costs the Company would have incurred to lease the Properties to its occupancy level at the date of acquisition by evaluating the period over which such occupancy level would be achieved and included an estimate of the net operating costs incurred during lease up. In-place lease costs, which are included in lease intangibles on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the respective tenant leases and the amortization is being recorded in depreciation and amortization expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Accounts Receivable Tenants and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - Tenant receivables are comprised of billed, but uncollected amounts due for monthly rent and other charges required pursuant to existing rental lease agreements. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded when a tenant’s receivable is not expected to be collected. A bad debt expense is charged when a tenant vacates a space with a remaining unpaid balance. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, no amounts were reserved for as an allowance for doubtful accounts. In the event a bad debt expense is recorded such amount would be included in other operating expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Restricted Cash - Funded Reserves - Funded reserves consist of (a) funds required to be maintained under the terms of the various loan agreements, which reserves have been pledged as additional collateral for those loans requiring funds to be reserved and (b) bond service reserve to be maintained under the bond indenture agreement for a period of twenty-four months commencing from the first bond closing date (October 17, 2016).
 
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning of period and end of period cash and restricted cash – funded reserves reported on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets to the totals shown on its consolidated statements of cash flows:
 
 
 
For the six-months ended June 30,
 
 
 
2018
 
 
2017
 
Beginning of period
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash
  788,301 
  1,187,293 
Restricted cash - funded reserves
  977,453 
  141,508 
 
    
    
Cash and restricted cash - funded reserves
  1,765,754 
  1,328,801 
 
    
    
End of period
    
    
Cash
  1,569,096 
  614,764 
Restricted cash - funded reserves
  687,829 
  642,229 
 
    
    
Cash and restricted cash - funded reserves
  2,256,925 
  1,256,993 
 
 
F-12
 
 
Rental Revenue - GAAP requires that the rental income be recorded for the period of occupancy using the effective monthly rent, which is the average monthly rental during the term of the lease. Accordingly, rental income is recognized ratably over the term of the respective leases, inclusive of leases which provide for scheduled rent increases and rental concessions. The difference between rental revenue earned on a straight-line basis and the cash rent due under the provisions of the lease agreements is recorded as deferred rent receivable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Rents received in advance are deferred until they become due and are recorded as deferred rent in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
Additionally, during the term of their respective leases, tenants pay either (i) their pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses (as defined in the underlying lease agreement), or (ii) a fixed rate for recoveries.
 
Income Taxes -The Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries are treated as disregarded entities and are treated as a component of GKIH for federal income tax reporting purposes. GKIH is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes and consequently, federal income taxes are not payable or provided for by the Company. Members of GKIH are taxed individually on their pro-rata ownership share of the Company’s earnings.
 
GAAP basis of accounting requires management to evaluate tax positions taken by the Company and to disclose a tax liability (or asset) if the Company has taken uncertain positions that more than likely than not would not be sustained upon examination by the Internal Revenue Service or other tax authorities. Management has analyzed the tax positions taken by the Company and has concluded that as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there were no uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken that would require disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.
 
Changes in Accounting Policies- In May 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606),” which outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The standard states that “an entity recognized revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services.” While the standard specifically references contracts with customers, it may apply to certain other transactions such as the sale of real estate or equipment. The Company’s adoption of the standard on January 1, 2018 did not have an impact on the pattern of revenue recognition.
 
On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Restricted Cash,” which requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during a reporting period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. This standard states that transfers between cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash are not part of the entity’s operating, investing, and financing activities. Therefore, restricted cash should be included with cash and cash equivalents when recording the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted the standard and retrospectively applied the guidance of the standard to the prior period presented, which resulted in an increase of $500,721 in net cash used in investing activities on its consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
 
In February 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-05, “Other Income – Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets,” which clarifies the scope of asset derecognition and adds further guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with non-customers. The Company has concluded that property sales represent transactions with non-customers. Sales of property generally represent only one performance obligation and are recognized when an enforceable contract is in place, collectability is ensured and control is transferred to the buyer. The Company’s adoption of this standard on January 1, 2018 did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements as there were no sales of property during the period.
 
Restatements Resulting from Changes in Accounting Principle – As described previously, the Company adopted ASU 2016-18 as of January 1, 2018, which required retroactive application of the standard as of June 30, 2018. As a result, the statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017 has been restated to explain the change in the total of cash and restricted cash, and the effects of the restatement are as follows:
 
 
 
As Previously Reported
 
 
Change in Accounting Principle
 
 
As Restated
 
Six months ended June 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net deposit to restricted cash - funded reserves
 $(500,721)
 $500,721 
 $- 
Net cash (used in) investing activities
  (11,325,223)
  500,721 
  (10,824,502)
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash and Restricted Cash
  (572,529)
  500,721 
  (71,808)
Cash and Restricted Cash - Beginning of period
  1,187,293 
  141,508 
  1,328,801 
Cash and Restricted Cash - End of period
  614,764 
  642,229 
  1,256,993 
 
 
F-13
 
 
 Recent Accounting Pronouncements – In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which sets out principles for the recognition, measurement presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessees and lessors). The standard requires that lessors expense, on an as-incurred basis, certain indirect initial costs that are not incremental in negotiating a lease. Under existing standards, certain of these costs are capitalized and therefore this new standard may result in certain of these costs being expensed as incurred after adoption. Under the standard, lessees apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases. A lessee is required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months, regardless of their lease classification. The Company is a lessee on ground leases at certain purposes, on certain office space leases and on certain other improvements and equipment. The standard will impact the accounting and disclosure requirements for these leases. The standard is effective for the Company under a modified retrospective approach beginning January 1, 2019. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
 
Note 2 - Rental Properties
 
Rental properties and depreciable lives are summarized as follows:
 
 
 
Depreciable Life-Years
 
 
June 30,
2018
 
 
December 31,
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land
 -
 $25,833,373 
 $25,833,373 
Land Improvements
10
  2,516,513 
  2,516,513 
Buildings
35-40
  25,088,810 
  25,088,810 
Tenant Improvements
(a)
  2,314,529 
  1,993,134 
 
       
    
    
Total Cost
       
  55,753,225 
  55,431,830 
 
       
    
    
(Less) accumulated depreciation
       
  (3,356,877)
  (2,700,819)
 
       
    
    
Net rental properties
       
 $52,396,348 
 $52,731,011 
 
(a) Depreciated over the lesser of the lease term or economic life.
 
Total depreciation charged to operations amounted to $656,058 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $740,649 for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
 
Note 3 – Deferred Leasing Costs
 
Deferred leasing costs are summarized of follows:
 
 
Basis Of Amortization
 
June 30,
2018
 
 
December 31,
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leasing commissions
Lease Terms
 $1,247,831 
 $1,248,012 
 
    
    
(Less) accumulated amortization
 
    
    
Leasing commissions
 
  (590,760)
  (475,792)
 
    
    
Deferred leasing costs - net
 
 $657,071 
 $772,220 
 
Total amortization expense charged to operations amounted to $139,254 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $139,474 for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
 
 
F-14
 
 
Note 4 - Lease Intangibles
 
Lease intangible assets are summarized as follows:
 
 
 
June 30,
2018
 
 
December 31,
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Above-market leases
 $1,282,002 
 $1,282,002 
In-place leases
  5,278,667 
  5,378,863 
 
    
    
Total cost
  6,560,669 
  6,660,865 
 
    
    
(Less) accumulated amortization
    
    
Above-market leases (reduction in rental income)
  (902,819)
  (701,858)
In-place leases (included in amortization expense)
  (3,107,379)
  (2,561,015)
 
  (4,010,198)
  (3,262,873)
 
    
    
Lease intangible assets - net
 $2,550,471 
 $3,397,992 
 
Total amortization expense attributable to above-market leases, which is recorded as a reduction in minimum rent revenue, amounted to $200,961 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $193,891 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Total amortization expense, attributable to in-place leases amounted to $646,560 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $786,007 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Such amounts are included in depreciation and amortization on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Future amortization for lease intangible assets is as follows:
 
Years Ending December 31
 
In-place leases
 
 
Above-market leases
 
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 (remaining six months)
 $611,094 
 $200,963 
 $812,057 
2019
  814,802 
  178,221 
  993,023 
2020
  228,612 
  - 
  228,612 
2021
  163,457 
  - 
  163,457 
2022
  85,779 
  - 
  85,779 
Thereafter
  267,543 
  - 
  267,543 
 
    
    
    
 
 $2,171,287 
 $379,184 
 $2,550,471 
 
 
F-15
 
 
Lease intangible liabilities consisted of:
 
 
 
June 30,
2018
 
 
December 31,
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Below market leases
 $2,878,751 
 $2,901,034 
 
    
    
(Less) accumulated accretion (increase in rental income)
  (1,128,291)
  (942,999)
 
    
    
Lease intangible liabilities - net
 $1,750,460 
 $1,958,035 
 
Total accretion expense of below-market leases, reported as an increase in minimum rent revenue, amounted to $207,575 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $233,516 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Future accretion income for lease intangible liabilities is as follows:
 
Years Ending December 31
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
2018 (remaining six months)
 $194,918 
2019
  350,666 
2020
  211,283 
2021
  178,042 
2022
  151,601 
Thereafter
  663,950 
 
    
 
 $1,750,460 
 
Note 5 – Fair Value
 
Accounting standards require certain assets and liabilities be reported at fair value in the consolidated financial statements and provide a framework for establishing that fair value. The framework for determining fair value is based on a hierarchy that prioritizes the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value.
 
Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.
 
Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs use other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and other inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. See Note 11 for a description of the valuation technique and significant inputs used to value assets and liabilities with Level 2 inputs.
 
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs, including inputs that are available in situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the related asset.
 
In instances whereby inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, fair value measurements in their entirety are categorized based on the lowest level input that is significant to the valuation. The Company’s assessment of the significance of particular inputs to these fair value measurements requires judgment and considers factors specific to each asset or liability.
 
 
F-16
 
 
Note 6 – Restricted Cash - Funded Reserves
 
Funded reserves are as follows:
 
Lake Mead Partners, LLC
 
Tenant improvement reserves: These reserves are required as a condition precedent of the Nevada State Bank mortgage loan payable by LM Partners. On acquisition, an account was established to fund future leasing commissions and tenant improvements. The funds are released from escrow once approved by the lender. Additionally, the unfunded balance of the Nevada State Bank note payable in the amount of $463,000 was funded into the tenant improvement reserve in 2017. LM Partners is required to fund a monthly amount of $2,648 to this reserve account and the funded reserves have been pledged as additional collateral for the Nevada State Bank mortgage loan.
 
2700 Ygnacio, LLC
 
Tenant improvement/lease commission reserves: On acquisition, a reserve account in the amount of $500,000 was funded from the Mutual Bank of Omaha loan proceeds to be used to fund leasing commissions and tenant improvements approved by the lender. Ygnacio is not required to fund additional amounts into this reserve account. The funded reserves have been pledged as additional collateral for the Mutual Bank of Omaha mortgage loan.
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
 
Bond service reserves: These reserves are required pursuant to the Bond Indenture Agreement, which requires that 7% of the gross bond proceeds be placed into a reserve account held by the bond trustee. The bond service reserve may be used to pay the Company’s bond service obligations and any funds remaining in the bond service reserve on the second anniversary of the first bond closing date (October 17, 2016), will be released to the Company.
 
Restricted cash - funded reserves consisted of:
 
 
 
June 30,
2018
 
 
December 31,
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tenant improvement/lease commission reserves
 $444,705 
 $761,670 
Bond service reserve
  243,124 
  215,783 
 
    
    
 
 $687,829 
 $977,453 
 
Note 7 - Notes Payable
 
Notes payable consisted of:
 
Lake Mead Partners, LLC
 
A.
Nevada State Bank
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the Property by LM Partners, LM Partners entered into a loan agreement with Nevada State Bank in the maximum amount of $30,000,000 of which $29,500,000 (“NP 1”) was funded on the acquisition of the Property and the unfunded balance of $500,000 (“NP 2”) was funded into the tenant improvement reserve, to be used to fund leasing commissions and tenant improvements approved by the lender. NP 1 and NP 2 are collectively referred herein as (the “Notes”). In conjunction with the sale of the 7,790 square foot building to PDCS (Note 12), LM Partners made a principal payment on the NP 1 loan reducing the outstanding principal balance by $2,700,000.
 
NP 1 bears interest at 4.00% per annum and, effective April 2017, is payable in monthly principal and interest payments of $141,904.
 
NP 2 bears interest at 4.00% per annum and was payable in monthly interest only payments through November 12, 2017 and thereafter, in monthly principal and interest payments based on a twenty-three-year loan amortization period until maturity.
 
The Notes mature on November 12, 2025, at which time the outstanding principal balance is due. The Notes are secured by the rental property and a $12,000,000 guarantee by GK Development, Inc. The Notes may be entirely prepaid subject to a prepayment penalty equal to 1% of the amount prepaid during the first five years of the term of the loan. Thereafter, the Notes can be prepaid without a prepayment penalty. In addition, the Notes are subject to certain financial covenant measurements.
 
 
F-17
 
 
B.
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Partners, LM Partners entered into a loan agreement with GK Secured Income IV, LLC (“GKSI IV”), a related party, in the maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Parent and LM Development. GKSI IV is managed by the Manager and the Sponsor of the Bonds. At June 30, 2018, $6,417,483 was owed by LM Parent. At December 31, 2017, $9,538,483 and $394,000 was owed by LM Parent and LM Development, respectively, aggregating to $9,932,483.
 
The loan bears interest at 8.00% per annum and requires monthly interest only payments until maturity on November 12, 2018. The loan, which may be partially or entirely prepaid subject to a prepayment penalty, as further detailed below, is collateralized by GKIH, LM Parent, and LM Development, granting GKSI IV a security interest in the right to receive dividends, distributions, and similar payments. Additionally, 25% of the outstanding principal balance is guaranteed by GK Development, Inc.
 
If the loan is prepaid, which results in GKSI IV being obligated to pay a Yield Maintenance Fee to the Members of GKSI IV, LM Partners and LM Development will be obligated to pay to GKSI IV an amount equal to such Yield Maintenance Fee. If the Yield Maintenance Fee becomes payable (a) during the first year that the Member holds a Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an amount equal to 12% per annum on the Repayment Amounts for the remainder of such year after the repayment date; (b) during the second year that the Member holds a Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an amount equal to 13% per annum on the Repayment Amounts for the remainder of such year after the repayment date;or (c) during the third year that the Member holds a Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an amount equal to 14% per annum on the Repayment Amounts for the remainder of such year after the repayment date.
 
If the loan is repaid within the third year (ending November 12, 2018), LM Partners and LM Development would be obligated to pay a prepayment penalty of approximately $3,341,380. This amount has been measured as of June 30, 2018, using a 12% per annum rate for the first year, 13% per annum rate for the second year and a 14% per annum rate for the third year.
 
Effective January 2018, LM Partners commenced repaying the GKSI IV loan out of the bond proceeds and $3,515,000 has been repaid as of June 30, 2018. It is management’s intention to continue to use the bond proceeds to repay the entire GKSI IV obligation prior to the November 12, 2018 maturity date.
 
C.
GK Development, Inc.
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Partners, LM Partners entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK Development, Inc., the Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds, in the maximum amount of $2,608,100. The loan, which bore interest at 7.00% per annum was repaid in 2017.
 
Lake Mead Development, LLC
 
A.
Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A.
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Development, LM Development entered into a mortgage loan agreement with Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A. in the original amount of $2,700,000. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75%, for an effective interest rate of 4.73% and 4.11% per annum at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Fixed monthly principal payments of $5,450 is required plus interest, through maturity of the loan on November 12, 2022. The loan was previously scheduled to mature on November 12, 2017, however a loan modification agreement was entered into extending the loan to November 12, 2022, under the same terms and conditions.
 
The loan is secured by the rental property and a personal guarantee by a member GKIH. The loan may be entirely prepaid without a prepayment penalty. In addition, the mortgage loan payable is subject to certain financial covenant measurements.
 
B.
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
 
As noted above, concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Development, LM Development entered into a loan agreement with GKSI IV in the maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Parent and LM Development. See above for the terms of the GKSI IV loan.
 
In January 2018, LM Development repaid its outstanding principal balance of the GKSI IV loan of $394,000.
 
2700 Ygnacio, LLC:
 
A.
Mutual of Omaha Bank
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by Ygnacio, Ygnacio entered into a loan agreement with Mutual of Omaha Bank in the maximum amount of $11,325,000 of which $10,825,000 was used to fund the acquisition of the rental property and the balance of $500,000 was used to fund an account to be used to fund leasing commissions and tenant improvements approved by the lender.
 
The loan bears interest at 4.50% per annum and is payable in monthly principal and interest payments of $63,373. The loan is scheduled to mature on February 1, 2024, however, the loan can be extended for an additional three-year period through February 1, 2027 at the mutual decision of both the borrower and lender, and at an interest rate to be set on or before December 3, 2023. The loan is secured by the rental property and a personal guarantee by an affiliate of one of GKIH’s members. The loan may be entirely prepaid subject to a prepayment penalty ranging from 0.5% to 2.0% of the amount prepaid during the first six years of the term of the loan. Thereafter, the loan can be prepaid without a prepayment penalty. In addition, the loan is subject to certain financial covenant measurements.
 
 
F-18
 
 
GK Development, Inc.
 
On December 22, 2016, Ygnacio entered into an Assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement with GK Development, Inc. (“Assignment”), pursuant to which GK Development, Inc. assigned to Ygnacio a Purchase and Sale Agreement, as amended, to acquire the three-story, Class A office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California. Concurrent with the entry into the Assignment, Ygnacio entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK Development, Inc., the Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds, for an amount of $855,000. The loan proceeds were used to fund the acquisition escrow deposit. The loan, which was fully repaid as of December 31, 2017, bore interest, payable monthly, at 7.00% per annum.
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by Ygnacio, Ygnacio entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK Development, Inc., in the amount of $1,450,000. This loan, which was fully repaid as of April 10, 2017, bore interest at 12.00% per annum through March 17, 2017 and 18% per annum thereafter through the re-payment date. Additionally, Ygnacio was required to pay a financing fee equal to 2% calculated on the amount borrowed.
 
Notes payable is summarized as follows:
 
 
 
June 30,
2018
 
 
December 31,
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nevada State Bank (NP 1)
 $25,042,610 
 $25,383,306 
Nevada State Bank (NP 2)
  492,173 
  500,000 
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
  6,417,483 
  9,932,483 
Barrington Bank & Trust Co. N.A.
  2,536,500 
  2,569,200 
Mutual of Omaha Bank
  10,990,990 
  11,119,475 
 
    
    
Total notes payable
 $45,479,756 
 $49,504,464 
 
    
    
 
 
Basis of Amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt issuance costs
Loan Terms
 $1,443,787 
 $1,524,879 
 
    
    
(Less) Accumulated amortization
 
  (478,668)
  (453,369)
 
    
    
Debt issuance costs - net
 
  965,119 
  1,071,510 
 
    
    
Notes payable - net
 
 $44,514,637 
 $48,432,954 
 
Total amortization expense of debt issuance costs charged to operations amounted to $106,394 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $115,865 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Such amounts have been included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
 
F-19
 
 
Future minimum principal payments are as follows:
 
Years Ending December 31
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
2018 (remaining six months)
 $6,933,075 
2019
  1,066,934 
2020
  1,105,633 
2021
  1,154,204 
2022
  3,442,951 
Thereafter
  31,776,959 
 
    
 
 $45,479,756 
 
Note 8 – Bonds Payable
 
The Company is offering 7% unsecured bonds at a purchase price of $1,000 per bond. The bonds, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 7% per annum, will mature on September 30, 2022. The bonds will continue to be sold through September 30, 2018 and the Company intends to continue to use the bond proceeds to pay down existing indebtedness and to acquire additional commercial rental properties.
 
The bonds are issued under an Indenture Trust Agreement with UMB Bank as the trustee. The Indenture Trust Agreement places certain financial covenants on the Company.
 
Prepayment penalties for calling the bonds early are as follows: (a) 1.02 times the price to the public ($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or before September 30, 2019; (b) 1.0015 times the price to the public ($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or after September 30, 2019 but on or before September 30, 2020;and (b) 1.001 times the price to the public ($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or after September 30, 2020 but on or before September 30, 2021. See Note 10 for specific amounts payable to GK Development, Inc., a related party, as sponsor of the bonds.
 
As of June 20, 2018, the Company started a “Volume-Weighted Discount” to the public. All purchases of Bonds subsequent to this filing will be subject to a volume-weighted discount to the price to public ($1,000 per bond) or the discount. The discount ranges from three to five percent depending on the volume of the bonds. The bonds shall continue to be denominated in $1,000 increments. Any discounts applied will reduce net proceeds to the Company.
 
Bonds payable is summarized as follows:
 
 
 
June 30,
2018
 
 
December 31,
2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bonds Payable
 $11,948,000 
 $7,113,000 
 
    
    
 
 
Basis of Amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bond Issuance Costs
Bond Term
  1,154,890 
  679,185 
Bond Discounts
Bond Term
  49,780 
  - 
(Less) Accumulated amortization
 
  (158,399)
  (74,383)
 
    
    
Deferred bond issuance and discount costs - net
  1,046,271 
  604,802 
 
    
    
Bonds payable - net
 
 $10,901,729 
 $6,508,198 
 
 
F-20
 
 
Total amortization expense of bond issuance costs and bond discounts charged to operations amounted to $84,015 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $25,661 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Such amounts have been included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Note 9 - Operating Leases
 
The rental properties have entered into leases with tenants which are classified as operating leases.
 
Approximate minimum base rentals to be received under these operating leases are as follows:
 
Years Ending December 31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 (remaining six months)
 $2,713,204 
2019
  3,925,182 
2020
  2,104,174 
2021
  1,575,336 
2022
  1,020,717 
Thereafter
  1,237,977 
 
    
 
 $12,576,590 
 
Several leases contain provisions for the tenants to pay additional rent to cover a portion of the Property's real estate taxes and defined operating expenses.
 
Lake Mead Partners, LLC
 
As of June 30, 2018, four tenants currently occupy 69.0% of the portion of the retail power center owned by LM Partners, representing approximately 27.23% of the future minimum base rental revenue under leases expiring on various dates between 2019 and 2020. These same tenants account for 32.39% of minimum rents for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 32.26% of minimum rents for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
 
Lake Mead Development, LLC
 
As of June 30, 2018, two tenants currently occupy 50.7% of the portion of the power center owned by LM Development, representing approximately 98.77% of the future minimum base rental revenue under leases expiring on various dates between 2022 and 2023. These same tenants account for 7.89% of minimum rents for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 7.30% of minimum rents for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
 
2700 Ygnacio, LLC
 
As of June 30, 2018, two tenants currently occupy 48.16% of the portion of the office building owned by Ygnacio, representing approximately 50.32% of the future minimum base rental revenue under leases expiring on various dates between 2019 and 2021. These same tenants account for 25.71% of minimum rents for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Three tenants account for 31.88% of minimum rents for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
 
Note 10 - Related Party Transactions
 
Lake Mead Crossings and Ygnacio are managed by GK Development, Inc., an affiliate of one of the members of GKIH, under management agreements that provide for property management fees equal to 3% of gross monthly revenue collected for Lake Mead Crossings and 5% of gross monthly revenue collected for Ygnacio. In addition to these management services, GK Development, Inc. also provides services relating to the acquisition and disposition of real estate property and tenant leasing.
 
GK Development, Inc. is responsible for promoting the sale of the bonds and is entitled to receive a fee equal to 1.88% of the $50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $940,000. In addition, GK Development is entitled to receive a reimbursement of organization and offering expenses equal to 0.55% of the $50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $275,000 and a reimbursement of Blue-Sky filing fees equal to 0.15% of the $50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $75,000. In the aggregate, GK Development, Inc. is entitled to receive 2.58% of the gross bond proceeds received.
 
 
F-21
 
 
See Note 7 for the loans payable to (i) GK Development Inc., the Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds and (ii) GKSI IV, LLC, an entity managed by the Manager and the Sponsor of the Bonds.
 
With respect to related parties, amounts incurred consisted of the following:
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2018
 
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2017
 
GK Development, Inc.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Management fees (3% or 5% of gross collections)
 $108,522 
 $107,454 
Acquisition fees (2% of the purchase price)
  - 
  300,000 
Disposition fees (2% of the selling price)
  - 
  80,000 
Brokerage fees (1% of the selling price)
  - 
  40,000 
Leasing commissions - capitalized
  17,759 
  104,052 
Interest on loans
  1,544 
  134,272 
Bond issuance costs
  123,308 
  318,697 
 
  251,133 
  1,084,475 
 
    
    
GKSI IV, LLC
    
    
Interest on loans
  318,329 
  395,685 
 
    
    
 
 $569,462 
 $1,480,160 
 
At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, $24,717 and $25,857, respectively, was owed to GK Development, Inc., and is included in due to affiliates on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017, $44,473 and $67,486, respectively, was owed to GKSI IV, LLC for unpaid accrued interest, which is included in accrued interest on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, GKSI IV, LLC was owed $199,570, at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, for unpaid accrued loan fees, which is included in accrued financing fees payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
Note 11 – Asset Acquisition of Rental Property
 
On December 22, 2016, the Company, through Ygnacio, entered into an assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement (“Assignment”), with GK Development, Inc., the Company’s Manager, and Sponsor, pursuant to which GK Development, Inc. assigned to Ygnacio that certain purchase and sale agreement, as amended, to acquire a three-story, Class A office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California. The acquisition closed on January 30, 2017 for a purchase price of $14,905,290 (excluding prorations). The primary reason for the acquisition was to realize the economic benefit of owning and operating a Class A office building. The results from the acquisition have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements since that date.
 
 
F-22
 
 
The following table summarizes the allocation of the assets and liabilities acquired at the date of acquisition:
 
Land and land improvements
 $10,353,173 
Rental property and improvements
  2,066,116 
Leasing commissions
  370,705 
Above-market leases
  372,258 
In-place leases
  1,935,645 
 
  15,097,897 
 
    
Below-market leases
  (192,607)
 
    
Net cash consideration
 $14,905,290 
 
Acquisition costs attributable to the acquisition of Ygnacio, which include acquisition fees and other closing fees totaled $369,573 for the six month period ended June 30, 2017. Such costs have been capitalized and included in rental properties on the accompany consolidated balance sheets. The change in the accounting policy with respect to acquisition costs, results from the Company early adopting ASU 2017-01 in January 2017 (Note 1).
 
The fair value of total identifiable net assets was determined with the assistance of a third-party appraiser using the income approach methodology of valuation. The income approach methodology utilizes the remaining non-cancelable lease terms as defined in lease agreements, market rental data, and discount rates. This fair value, is based relying heavily on market observable data such as rent comparables, sales comparables, and broker indications, which are Level 2 inputs, as discussed in Note 5. Key assumptions include a capitalization rate of 7.5%, growth rates for market rentals of 3.0%, and a discount rate of 8.75%. The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired based on their relative fair market value.
 
Note 12 – Sale of Rental Property
 
The Company, through LM Partners, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Pacific Dental Services, LLC (“PDCS”), a tenant in the rental property, in terms of which LM Partners agreed to sell to PDCS the building partially occupied by PDCS, containing approximately 7,790 leasable square feet, for $4,000,000 (excluding prorations). The sale closed on March 20, 2017, resulting in a gain on sale of the rental property of $1,738,882, which has been included in gain on sale of rental property on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2017. $2,700,000 of the sale proceeds was used to reduce the outstanding principal balance on the Nevada State Bank loan and $980,000 of the sales proceeds was used to reduce the outstanding principal balance on the GK Development, Inc. loan.
 
The following table summarizes the gain on sale of the rental property:
 
Sales price
 $4,000,000 
Less Closing costs
  (381,095)
 
    
Net proceeds from sale
  3,618,905 
 
    
Less Net book value of property sold
  (1,880,023)
 
    
Gain on sale
 $1,738,882 
 
 
 
F-23
 
 
Note 13 – Subsequent Events
 
As of June 30, 2018, $11,948,000 of Bonds have been sold and through September 26, 2018, $19,548,000 have been sold.
 
The consolidated financial statements and related disclosures include evaluation of events up through and including September 26, 2018, which is the date the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
F-24
 
 
Independent Auditor’s Report
 
To the Management of GK Development, Inc.
Property Manager of
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Barrington, Illinois
 
Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of GK Investment Holdings, LLC, which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, members’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements.
 
Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
 
Auditor’s Responsibility
 
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
 
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
 
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
 
Opinion
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of GK Investment Holdings, LLC as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
Emphasis of Matter
 
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The update clarifies the definition of a business and adds guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of assets or business combinations. Our Opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
 
/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
 
Denver, Colorado
April 20, 2018

 
F-25
 
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2017 and 2016
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental properties
 $55,431,830 
 $44,329,103 
Less: Accumulated depreciation
  2,700,819 
  1,266,411 
 
  52,731,011 
  43,062,692 
 
    
    
Cash
  788,301 
  1,187,293 
Accounts receivable - tenants
  72,759 
  141,707 
Deferred rent receivable
  189,884 
  48,514 
Deferred leasing costs - Net
  772,220 
  528,161 
Lease intangibles - Net
  3,397,992 
  3,228,195 
Restricted cash - funded reserves
  977,453 
  141,508 
Other receivables - tenant
  - 
  75,969 
Other assets
  124,197 
  1,026,758 
 
    
    
Total assets
 $59,053,817 
 $49,440,797 
 
    
    
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
    
    
 
    
    
LIABILITIES
    
    
Notes payable - Net
 $48,432,954 
 $42,995,515 
Bonds payable - Net
  6,508,198 
  1,320,126 
Accrued financing fees payable
  199,570 
  297,570 
Deferred rent
  110,425 
  7,006 
Lease intangibles - Net
  1,958,035 
  2,235,743 
Accrued interest
  185,765 
  138,211 
Other accrued liabilities
  98,504 
  88,289 
Due to affiliates
  25,857 
  138,773 
Tenant security deposits
  122,803 
  22,450 
Total liabilities
  57,642,111 
  47,243,683 
 
    
    
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 8 and 9)
    
    
 
    
    
Members' Equity
    
    
Members' Equity
  1,411,706 
  2,197,114 
 
    
    
 
 $59,053,817 
 $49,440,797 
 
 
F-26
 
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
Minimum rents
 $5,613,107 
 $3,518,421 
Tenant recoveries
  459,198 
  463,548 
Other rental income
  - 
  4,055 
 
  6,072,305 
  3,986,024 
 
    
    
 
    
    
Operating Expenses
    
    
Operating expenses
  1,149,276 
  480,502 
Insurance
  93,107 
  46,805 
Management fees
  229,570 
  112,918 
Professional fees
  141,785 
  81,418 
Real estate taxes
  358,111 
  230,806 
Acquisition and closing costs
  - 
  3,489 
Depreciation and amortization
  3,399,954 
  2,247,313 
 
  5,371,803 
  3,203,251 
 
    
    
Other Income and (Expense)
    
    
Interest income
  90 
  8 
Interest expense
  (3,238,256)
  (2,381,086)
Miscellaneous income
  13,374 
  5,106 
Gain on sale of rental property
  1,738,882 
  - 
 
  (1,485,910)
  (2,375,972)
 
    
    
Consolidated Net Loss
 $(785,408)
 $(1,593,199)
 
 
F-27
 

GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance - Beginning of Year
 $2,197,114 
 $3,790,313 
 
    
    
Consolidated Net Loss
  (785,408)
  (1,593,199)
 
    
    
Balance - End of Year
 $1,411,706 
 $2,197,114 
 
 
 

 
F-28
 
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Net Loss
 $(785,408)
 $(1,593,199)
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net loss to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:
    
    
Depreciation and amortization
  3,399,954 
  2,247,313 
Amortization of above-market leases
  394,853 
  307,133 
Accretion of below-market leases
  (470,315)
  (426,299)
Deferred rent receivable
  (141,370)
  (42,955)
Gain on sale of rental property
  (1,738,882)
  - 
Amortization of debt issuance costs
  229,781 
  192,956 
Amortization of bond issuance costs
  72,342 
  2,041 
Changes in:
    
    
Accounts receivable - tenants
  68,948 
  (94,498)
Other receivables - tenant
  75,969 
  31,646 
Other assets
  (102,439)
  3,963 
Accounts payable
  - 
  (11,954)
Deferred rent
  103,419 
  (38,349)
Accrued interest
  47,554 
  (44,618)
Other accrued liabilities
  10,215 
  37,657 
Due to affiliates
  16,084 
  (722,562)
Tenant security deposits
  100,353 
  - 
 
    
    
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities
  1,281,058 
  (151,725)
 
    
    
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
    
    
Acquisition of rental property
  (14,905,290)
  (62,999)
Acquisition costs incurred
  (369,574)
  - 
Additions to rental properties
  (217,718)
  - 
Net proceeds from sale of rental property
  3,618,905 
  - 
Payments of deferred leasing commissions
  (200,817)
  (9,315)
Deposits for acquisition of rental property
  1,005,000 
  (1,005,000)
Net deposits to restricted cash - funded reserves
  (835,945)
  (138,859)
 
    
    
 
    
    
Net cash (used in) investing activities
  (11,905,439)
  (1,216,173)
 
    
    
 
 
F-29
 
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
 
 
 
 (Continued)
 
 
 (Continued)
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from notes payable
 $13,212,000 
 $2,366,484 
Repayment of notes payable
  (6,679,100)
  - 
Principal payment on notes payable
  (944,880)
  (759,655)
Payment of financing costs
  (478,362)
  (556,000)
Proceeds from bonds payable
  5,658,000 
  1,455,000 
Payment of bond issue costs
  (542,269)
  (136,916)
 
    
    
Net cash provided by financing activities
  10,225,389 
  2,368,913 
 
    
    
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash
  (398,992)
  1,001,015 
 
    
    
Cash - Beginning of year
  1,187,293 
  186,278 
 
    
    
Cash - End of year
 $788,301 
 $1,187,293 
 
    
    
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
    
    
Cash paid for interest
 $2,888,579 
 $2,230,707 
 
    
    
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
    
    
 
    
    
Financing fees accrued and not paid
 $- 
 $28,970 
 
 
F-30
 
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Description of Business On September 14, 2015, GK Investment Holdings, LLC (“GKIH” and/or the “Company”), a Delaware limited liability company was formed with the intent to acquire existing income producing commercial rental properties for the purpose of holding and operating such properties, and if the need arises, to redevelop the rental properties for an alternative use other than intended when originally acquired. However, GKIH is permitted to transact in any lawful business in addition to that stated above. GKIH anticipates funding acquisitions in part, by offering to investors the opportunity to purchase up to a maximum of $50,000,000 of Bonds of which $7,113,000 and $1,455,000 was sold as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively (Note 9). The Bonds are unsecured indebtedness of GKIH.
 
The members of GKIH have limited liability. Pursuant to the terms of the Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (the “Agreement”), the Company will exist in perpetuity unless terminated as defined in the Agreement. The Company is managed by GK Development, Inc. (the “Manager” and “Sponsor of the bonds”), an affiliate of one of the members of GKIH.
 
On October 22, 2015, Lake Mead Parent, LLC (“LM Parent”) and Lake Mead Development, LLC (“LM Development”), both Delaware limited liability companies were formed and on October 22, 2015, Lake Mead Partners, LLC (“LM Partners”), a Delaware limited liability company was formed with LM Parent as its sole member. On October 21, 2016, 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC (“Ygnacio”), a Delaware limited liability company was formed. LM Parent, LM Development and Ygnacio are 100% owned by GKIH.
 
The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017, are as follows:
 
LM Parent – 100% owned by GKIH; owns 100% of LM Partners;
 
LM Development – 100% owned by GKIH;
 
2700 Ygnacio, LLC (“Ygnacio”) – 100% owned by GKIH.
 
LM Partners and LM Development were formed to acquire, own, and operate a retail power center known as Lake Mead Crossing, located in Henderson, Nevada (the "Lake Mead Crossings"). Lake Mead Crossings was purchased on November 12, 2015. Prior to the purchase of Lake Mead Crossings, GKIH had no activity. Ygnacio was formed to acquire a three-story Class A office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California. Subsequent to year end (January 30, 2017).
 
The Lake Mead Crossings was financed as follows:
 
LM Parent - (i) a first mortgage loan in the maximum amount of $30,000,000, of which $29,500,000 was funded upon acquisition; (ii) a mezzanine loan, in the maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Partners and LM Development, of which $7,210,298 was funded to LM Partners upon acquisition and (iii) an interim loan from GK Development, Inc. of which $2,608,100 was funded upon acquisition.
 
LM Development - (i) a first mortgage loan in the original amount of $2,700,000; (ii) a mezzanine loan, in the maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Partners and LM Development, of which $339,702 was funded to LM Development upon acquisition and (iii) an interim loan from GK Development, Inc. of which $20,000 was funded upon acquisition.
 
The acquisition of Ygnacio was financed with (i) bond proceeds in the amount of $1,750,000; (ii) a first mortgage loan in the maximum amount of $11,325,000, of which $500,000 was retained by the lender to establish a tenant improvement/lease commission escrow reserve; and (iii) an interim loan from GK Development, Inc. of which $2,305,000 was funded upon acquisition.
 
Allocation of Profits and Losses - Profits or losses from operations of the Company are allocated to the members of GKIH as set forth in the Agreement. Gains and losses from the sale, exchange, or other disposition of Company property will be allocated to the members of GKIH in their ownership percentages.
 
 
F-31
 
 
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.
 
Basis of Accounting - The Company maintains its accounting records and prepares its consolidated financial statements on an accrual basis, which is in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).
 
Classification of Assets and Liabilities - The financial affairs of the Company generally do not involve a business cycle since the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities are usually dependent on the Company’s circumstances. Accordingly, the classification of current assets and current liabilities is not considered appropriate and has been omitted from the consolidated balance sheets.
 
Estimates - The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Cash and Restricted Cash - The Company maintains cash and restricted cash balances in federally insured financial institutions that, from time to time, exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits. The Company believes that they are not exposed to any significant credit risk on its cash and restricted cash. Restricted cash consists of tenant improvement reserves and bond service reserves.
 
Rental Properties - Land, building, and other depreciable assets are recorded at cost unless obtained in a business combination. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
 
The cost of major additions and betterments are capitalized and repairs and maintenance which do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets are charged to operations as incurred. When property is retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gains or losses are reflected in operations for the period.
 
Upon the acquisition of rental properties, the fair value of the real estate purchased is allocated to the acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and improvements) and acquired intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above-market and below-market leases, leasing commissions and acquired in-place leases). The fair value of the tangible assets of the acquired property is determined using the income approach methodology of valuation, which value is then allocated to land, buildings and improvements based on management’s determination of the relative fair values of the assets, relying in part, upon an independent third party appraiser. In valuing an acquired property’s intangibles, factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, and estimates of loss rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs. The Company will record a bargain purchase price adjustment if it determines that the purchase price for the acquired assets is less than the fair value at the time of acquisition.
 
Impairment of Assets - The Company reviews the recoverability of long lived assets including buildings, equipment, and other intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on the ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from the expected future pretax cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such assets, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value. The measurement of impairment requires management to make estimates of these cash flows related to long lived assets, as well as other fair value determinations. The Company does not believe that there are any events or circumstances indicating impairment of its investments in the rental properties and related long lived assets as of December 31, 2017, and 2016.
 
Debt Issuance Costs – Debt issuance costs represent fees and other third party costs associated with obtaining financing for the rental properties. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the respective loan agreements. Debt issuance costs are presented on the consolidated balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability. Unamortized costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Amortization expense is included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
 
F-32
 
 
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
Bond Issuance Costs – Bond issuance costs represent underwriting compensation and offering costs and expenses associated with selling the bonds. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the bonds. Bond issuance costs are presented on the consolidated balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the bond liability. Unamortized bond issue costs will be expensed if the bonds are repaid before maturity (September 30, 2022). Amortization expense is included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
 
Deferred Leasing Costs – Deferred leasing costs represent leasing commissions, legal fees and other third party costs associated with obtaining tenants for the rental properties. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Amortization expense is included in depreciation and amortization expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Lease Intangible Assets and Liabilities – GAAP requires intangible assets and liabilities to be recognized apart from goodwill if they arise from contractual or other legal rights (regardless of whether those rights are transferrable or separable from the acquired entity or from other rights and obligations).
 
Upon acquisition of Lake Mead Crossings, the Company recorded above and below-market leases based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflected the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (a) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (b) the Company estimates of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. These assets and liabilities are being amortized or accreted on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the respective tenant leases and the amortization or accretion is being recorded as an adjustment to rental income.
 
Upon acquisition of Lake Mead Crossings, the Company estimated the fair market value of acquired leasing commissions as the costs the Company would have incurred to lease Lake Mead Crossings to its occupancy level at the date of acquisition. Such estimate, which is included in lease intangibles on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, includes the fair value of leasing commissions, legal costs and other third party costs that would be incurred to lease Lake Mead Crossings to the level at the date of the acquisition. Such costs are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the respective tenant leases and the amortization is being recorded in depreciation and amortization expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Additionally, the Company estimated the fair value of acquired in-place lease costs as the costs the Company would have incurred to lease Lake Mead Crossings to its occupancy level at the date of acquisition by evaluating the time period over which such occupancy level would be achieved and included an estimate of the net operating costs incurred during lease up. In-place lease costs, which are included in lease intangibles on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the respective tenant leases and the amortization is being recorded in depreciation and amortization expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Accounts Receivable Tenants and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – Tenant receivables are comprised of billed, but uncollected amounts due for monthly rent and other charges required pursuant to existing rental lease agreements. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded when a tenant’s receivable is not expected to be collected. A bad debt expense is charged when a tenant vacates a space with a remaining unpaid balance. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, no amounts were reserved for as an allowance for doubtful accounts. In the event a bad debt expense is recorded, such amount would be included in other operating expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Restricted Cash – Funded reserves consist of (a) funds required to be maintained under the terms of the various loan agreements, which reserves have been pledged as additional collateral for the loans requiring funds to be reserved and (b) bond service reserve to be maintained under the bond indenture agreement for a period of twelve months commencing from the first bond closing date (October 17, 2016).
 
 
F-33
 
 
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
Rental Revenue – GAAP requires that the rental income be recorded for the period of occupancy using the effective monthly rent, which is the average monthly rental during the term of the lease. Accordingly, rental income is recognized ratably over the term of the respective leases, inclusive of leases which provide for scheduled rent increases and rental concessions. The difference between rental revenue earned on a straight-line basis and the cash rent due under the provisions of the lease agreements is recorded as deferred rent receivable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Rents received in advance are deferred until they become due and are recorded as deferred rent in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
Additionally, during the term of their respective leases, tenants pay either (i) their pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses (as defined in the underlying lease agreement), or (ii) a fixed rate for recoveries.
 
Income Taxes The Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries are treated as disregarded entities for federal income tax reporting purposes and are treated as a component of GKIH for federal income tax purposes. GKIH is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes and consequently, federal income taxes are not payable or provided for by the Company. Members of GKIH are taxed individually on their prorata ownership share of the Company’s earnings.
 
GAAP basis of accounting requires management to evaluate tax positions taken by the Company and to disclose a tax liability (or asset) if the Company has taken uncertain positions that more than likely than not would not be sustained upon examination by the Internal Revenue Service or other tax authorities. Management has analyzed the tax positions taken by the Company, and has concluded that as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken that would require disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.
 
Changes in Accounting Policies – In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business,” and provides further guidance for evaluating whether a transaction be accounted for as an acquisition of an asset or a business. ASU 2017-01 is effective for interim annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The new standard is required to be applied prospectively to transactions occurring after the date of adoption. Under the ASU, we believe most of our future acquisitions of operating properties will qualify as asset acquisitions and most future transaction costs associated with these acquisitions will be capitalized. As of January 30, 2017, the Company early adopted ASU 2017-01 and the acquisition costs totaling $369,574, related to our acquisition of Ygnacio, were capitalized.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements – In May 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The standards states that “an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” While the standard specifically references contracts with customers, it may apply to certain other transactions such as the sale of real estate or equipment. This standard will not apply to the Company’s recognition of tenant recoveries until January 1, 2019, when it adopts ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic842)”, as discussed below, however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.
 
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which sets out principles for the recognition, measurement presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessees and lessors). The standard requires that lessors expense, on an as-incurred basis, certain indirect initial costs that are not incremental in negotiating a lease. Under existing standards, certain of these costs are capitalized and therefore this new standard may result in certain of these costs being expensed as incurred after adoption. Additionally, under this standard, certain common area maintenance recoveries must be accounted for as a non-lease component.
 
 
F-34
 
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
 
In November 2017, The FASB decided to proceed with issuing a final accounting standards update on the new leasing standard, which would provide additional practical expedients that can be elected upon adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019. The FASB issued an exposure draft on January 5, 2018 that includes a practical expedient that would allow lessors, as an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset, not to bifurcate non-lease components from related lease components if certain conditions are met, and a practical expedient that would enable a cumulative effect transition option in which acompany would not have to adjust their comparative financial statements for the effects of the new standard. The Company plans to utilize the practical expedients provided by ASU 2016-02 and the final accounting standards update and will continue to monitor and review updates as they are provided by the FASB.
 
In November 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash,” which requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. The adoption of this ASU will impact the presentation of the consolidated statements of cash flows, as well as require additional footnote disclosure to reconcile the consolidated balance sheet to the revised consolidated cash flow statement presentation.
 
In February 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-05, “Other Income – Gain from the Derecognition of Non-Financial Assets” which provides guidance on the application of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 610-20, specifically on the sale or transfer of nonfinancial assets and the recognition of revenue from that sale or transfer of nonfinancial assets. ASU 2017-05 is effective date for the Company beginning January 1, 2018. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.
 
Note 2 – Rental Properties
 
Rental properties and depreciable lives are summarized as follows:
 
 
 
Depreciable Life-Years
 
 
 
  2017
 
 
   2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land
- 
 $25,833,373 
 $15,753,199 
Land Improvements
10 
  2,516,513 
  2,562,407 
Buildings
35-40 
  25,088,810 
  25,029,982 
Tenant Improvements
 
(a)
 
  1,993,134 
  983,515 
 
       
    
    
Total Cost
       
  55,431,830 
  44,329,103 
 
       
    
    
(Less) accumulated depreciation
       
  (2,700,819
)
  (1,266,411)
 
       
    
    
Net rental properties
       
 $52,731,011 
 $43,062,692
 
 
(a) Depreciated over the lesser of the lease term or economic life.
 
Total depreciation charged to operations amounted to $1,500,898 and $1,085,350 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
 
 
F-35
 
 
Note 3 – Deferred Leasing Costs
 
Deferred leasing costs are summarized of follows:
 
 
Basis Of Amortization
 
 2017
 
 
 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leasing commissions
Lease Terms
 $1,248,012 
 $728,353 
 
    
    
(Less) accumulated amortization
 
    
    
Leasing commissions
 
  (475,792)
  (200,192)
 
    
    
Deferred leasing costs - net
 
 $772,220 
 $528,161 
 
Total amortization expense charged to operations amounted to $304,792 and $170,853 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
 
Future amortization for deferred leasing costs is as follows
 
Years Ending December 31
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
2018
 $255,703 
2019
  197,596 
2020
  98,511 
2021
  72,401 
2022
  43,696 
Thereafter
  104,313 
 
    
 
 $772,220 
 
Note 4 – Lease Intangibles
 
Lease intangible assets are summarized as follows:
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Above-market leases
 $1,282,002 
 $998,730 
In-place leases
  5,378,863 
  3,761,204 
 
    
    
Total cost
  6,660,865 
  4,759,934 
 
    
    
(Less) accumulated amortization
    
    
Above-market leases (reduction in rental income)
  (701,858)
  (359,634)
In-place leases (included in amortization expense)
  (2,561,015)
  (1,172,105)
 
  (3,262,873)
  (1,531,739)
 
    
    
Lease intangible assets - net
 $3,397,992 
 $3,228,195 
 
Total amortization expense attributable to above-market leases, which is recorded as a reduction in minimum rent revenue, amounted to $394,853 and $307,133 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Total amortization expense, attributable to in-place leases amounted to $1,594,264 and $991,110 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Such amounts are included in depreciation and amortization on the accompanying statements of operations.
 
 
F-36
 

Note 4 – Lease Intangibles (continued)
 
Future amortization for lease intangible assets is as follows:
 
Years Ending December 31
 
In-place leases
 
 
Above-market leases
 
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018
 $1,257,655 
 $401,923 
 $1,659,578 
2019
  814,802 
  178,221 
  993,023 
2020
  228,612 
  - 
  228,612 
2021
  163,457 
  - 
  163,457 
2022
  85,779 
  - 
  85,779 
Thereafter
  267,543 
  - 
  267,543 
 
    
    
    
 
 $2,817,848 
 $580,144 
 $3,397,992 
 
Lease intangible liabilities consisted of:
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Below market leases
 $2,901,034 
 $2,744,690 
 
    
    
(Less) accumulated accretion (increase in rental income)
  (942,999)
  (508,947)
 
    
    
Lease intangible liabilities - net
 $1,958,035 
 $2,235,743 
 
Total accretion expense of below-market leases, reported as an increase in minimum rent revenue, amounted to $470,315 and $426,299 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Future accretion income for lease intangible liabilities is as follows:
 
Years Ending December 31
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
2018
 $402,493 
2019
  350,666 
2020
  211,283 
2021
  178,042 
2022
  151,601 
Thereafter
  663,950 
 
    
 
 $1,958,035 
 
 
F-37
 

Note 5 – Fair Value
 
Accounting standards require certain assets and liabilities be reported at fair value in the consolidated financial statements and provide a framework for establishing that fair value. The framework for determining fair value is based on a hierarchy that prioritizes the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value.
 
Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.
 
Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs use other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and other inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. See Note 12 for a description of the valuation technique and significant inputs used to value assets and liabilities with Level 3 inputs.
 
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs, including inputs that are available in situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the related asset.
 
In instances whereby inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, fair value measurements in their entirety are categorized based on the lowest level input that is significant to the valuation. The Company’s assessment of the significance of particular inputs to these fair value measurements requires judgement and considers factors specific to each asset or liability.
 
Note 6 – Restricted Cash - Funded Reserves
 
Funded reserves are as follows:
 
Lake Mead Partners, LLC (“LM Partners”)
 
Tenant improvement reserves: These reserves are required as a condition precedent of the Nevada State Bank mortgage loan payable by LM Partners. On acquisition, an account was established to fund future leasing commissions and tenant improvements. The funds are released from escrow once approved by the lender. Additionally, the unfunded balance of the Nevada StateBank note payable in the amount of $463,000 was funded into the tenant improvement reserve in 2017. LM Partners is required to fund a monthly amount of $2,648 to this reserve account and the funded reserves have been pledged as additional collateral for the Nevada State Bank mortgage loan.
 
2700 Ygnacio, LLC (“Ygnacio”):
 
Tenant improvement/lease commission reserves: On acquisition, a reserve account in the amount of $500,000 was funded from the Mutual Bank of Omaha loan proceeds to be used to fund leasing commissions and tenant improvements approved by the lender. Ygnacio is not required to fund additional amounts into this reserve account. The funded reserves have been pledged as additional collateral for the Mutual Bank of Omaha mortgage loan.
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC:
 
Bond service reserves: These reserves are required pursuant to the Bond Indenture Agreement, which requires that 7% of the gross bond proceeds be placed into a reserve account held by the bond trustee. The bond service reserve may be used to pay the Company’s bond service obligations and any funds remaining in the bond service reserve on the second anniversary of the first bond closing date (October 17, 2016), will be released to the Company.
 
Restricted cash - funded reserves consisted of:
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
Tenant improvement/lease commission reserves
 $761,670 
 $39,658 
Bond service reserve
  215,783 
  101,850 
 
    
    
 
 $977,453 
 $141,508 
 
 
F-38
 

Note 7 – Other Receivable-Tenant
 
On acquisition of the rental property by LM Partners, LM Partners assumed a receivable owed by one of the tenants Pacific Dental Services, LLC (“PDCS”). LM Partners sold to PDCS the building partially occupied by PDCS, containing approximately 7,790 leasable square feet, for $4,000,000 (excluding prorations). See Note 13. The sale closed on March 20, 2017 and the outstanding receivable balance was repaid.
 
Note 8 – Notes Payable
 
Notes payable consisted of:
 
Lake Mead Partners, LLC (“LM Partners”)
 
A. Nevada State Bank
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the Property by LM Partners, LM Partners entered into a loan agreement with Nevada State Bank in the maximum amount of $30,000,000 of which $29,500,000 (“NP 1”) was funded on the acquisition of the Property and the unfunded balance of $500,000 (“NP 2”) was funded into the tenant improvement reserve, to be used to fund leasing commissions and tenant improvements approved by the lender. NP 1 and NP 2 are collectively referred herein as (the “Notes”). In conjunction with the sale of the 7,790 square foot building to PDCS (Note 13), LM Partners made a principal payment on the NP 1 loan reducing the outstanding principal balance by $2,700,000.
 
NP 1 bears interest at 4.00% per annum and, effective April 2017, is payable in monthly principal and interest payments of $141,904.
 
NP 2 bears interest at 4.00% per annum and is payable in monthly interest only payments through November 12, 2017 and thereafter, in monthly principal and interest payments based on a twentythreeyear loan amortization period until maturity.
 
The Notes mature on November 12, 2025, at which time the outstanding principal balance is due. The Notes are secured by the rental property and a $12,000,000 guarantee by GK Development, Inc.. The Notes may be entirely prepaid subject to a prepayment penalty equal to 1% of the amount prepaid during the first five years of the term of the loan. Thereafter, the Notes can be prepaid without a prepayment penalty. In addition, the Notes are subject to certain financial covenant measurements.
 
B. GK Secured Income IV, LLC
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Partners, LM Partners entered into a loan agreement with GK Secured Income IV, LLC (“GKSI IV”), a related party, in the maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Parent and LM Development. GKSI IV is managed by the Manager and the Sponsor of the Bonds. At December 31, 2017, $9,538,483 and $394,000 was owed by LM Parent and LM Development, respectively, aggregating to $9,932,483 and at December 31, 2016, $9,538,483 and $440,000 was owed by LM Parent and LM Development, respectively, aggregating to $9,978,483.
 
The loan bears interest at 8.00% per annum and requires monthly interest only payments until maturity on November 12, 2018. The loan, which may be partially or entirely prepaid subject to a prepayment penalty, as further detailed below, is collateralized by GKIH, LM Parent, and LM Development, granting GKSI IV a security interest in the right to receive dividends, distributions, and similar payments. Additionally, 25% of the outstanding principal balance is guaranteed by GK Development, Inc.
 
 
F-39
 

Note 8 – Notes Payable (continued)
 
If the loan is prepaid, which results in GKSI IV being obligated to pay a Yield Maintenance Fee to the Members of GKSI IV, LM Partners and LM Development will be obligated to pay to GKSI IV an amount equal to such Yield Maintenance Fee. If the Yield Maintenance Fee becomes payable (a) during the first year that the Member holds a Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an amount equal to 12% per annum on the Repayment Amounts for the remainder of such year after the repayment date; (b) during the second year that the Member holds a Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an amount equal to 13% per annum on the Repayment Amounts for the remainder of such year after the repayment date; or (c) during the third year that the Member holds a Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an amount equal to 14% per annum on the Repayment Amounts for the remainder of such year after the repayment date.
 
If the loan is repaid within the third year (ending November 12, 2018), LM Partners and LM Development would be obligated to pay a prepayment penalty of approximately $3,504,000. This amount has been measured as of December 31, 2017, using a 12% per annum rate for the first year, 13% per annum rate for the second year and a 14% per annum rate for the third year.
 
Effective January 2018, LM Partners commenced repaying the GKSI IV loan out of the bond proceeds and $1,756,000 has been repaid as of April 20, 2018. It is management’s intention to continue to use the bond proceeds to repay the entire GKSI IV obligation prior to the November 12, 2018 maturity date.
 
C. GK Development, Inc.
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Partners, LM Partners entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK Development, Inc., the Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds, in the maximum amount of $2,608,100. The loan bore interest at 7.00% per annum and was repaid in 2017.
 
Lake Mead Development, LLC (“LM Development”)
 
D. Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A.
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Development, LM Development entered into a mortgage loan agreement with Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A. in the original amount of $2,700,000. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75%, for an effective interest rate of 4.11% and 3.37% per annum at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Fixed monthly principal payments of $5,450 is required plus interest, through maturity of the loan on November 12, 2022. The loan was previously scheduled to mature on November 12, 2017, however a loan modification agreement was entered into extending the loan to November 12, 2022, under the same terms and conditions.
 
The loan is secured by the rental property and a personal guarantee by a member GKIH. The loan may be entirely prepaid without a prepayment penalty. In addition, the mortgage loan payable is subject to certain financial covenant measurements.
 
E. GK Secured Income IV, LLC
 
As noted above, concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Development, LM Development entered into a loan agreement with GKSI IV in the maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Parent and LM Development. See above for the terms of the GKSI IV loan.
 
In January 2018, LM Development repaid its outstanding principal balance of the GKSI IV loan of $394,000.
 
 
F-40
 

Note 8 – Notes Payable (continued)
 
2700 Ygnacio, LLC (“Ygnacio”)
 
F) Mutual of Omaha Bank\
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by Ygnacio, Ygnacio entered into a loan agreement with Mutual of Omaha Bank in the maximum amount of $11,325,000 of which $10,825,000 was used to fund the acquisition of the rental property and the balance of $500,000 was used to fund an account to be used to fund leasing commissions and tenant improvements approved by the lender.
 
The loan bears interest at 4.50% per annum and is payable in monthly principal and interest payments of $63,373. The loan is scheduled to mature on February 1, 2024, however, the loan can be extended for an additional three-year period through February 1, 2027 at the mutual decision of both the borrower and lender, and at an interest rate to be set on or before December 3, 2023. The loan is secured by the rental property and a personal guarantee by an affiliate of one of GKIH’s members. The loan may be entirely prepaid subject to a prepayment penalty ranging from 0.5% to 2.0% of the amount prepaid during the first six years of the term of the loan. Thereafter, the loan can be prepaid without a prepayment penalty. In addition, the loan is subject to certain financial covenant measurements.
 
GK Development, Inc.
 
On December 22, 2016, Ygnacio entered into an Assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement with GK Development, Inc. (“Assignment”), pursuant to which GK Development, Inc. assigned to Ygnacio a Purchase and Sale Agreement, as amended, to acquire the three-story, Class A office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California. Concurrent with the entry into the Assignment, Ygnacio entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK Development, Inc., the Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds, for an amount of $855,000. The loan proceeds were used to fund the acquisition escrow deposit. The loan, which was fully repaid as of December 31, 2017, bore interest, payable monthly, at 7.00% per annum.
 
Concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property by Ygnacio, Ygnacio entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK Development, Inc., in the amount of $1,450,000. This loan, which was fully repaid as of April 10, 2017, bore interest at 12.00% per annum through March 17, 2017 and 18% per annum thereafter through the re-payment date. Additionally, Ygnacio was required to pay a financing fee equal to 2% calculated on the amount borrowed.
 
Notes payable is summarized as follows:
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nevada State Bank (NP 1)
 $25,383,306 
 $28,757,262 
Nevada State Bank (NP 2)
  500,000 
  63,000 
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
  9,932,483 
  9,978,483 
Barrington Bank & Trust Co. N.A.
  2,569,200 
  2,634,600 
Mutual of Omaha Bank
  11,119,475 
  - 
GK Development, Inc.
  - 
  2,483,100 
 
    
    
Total notes payable
 $49,504,464 
 $43,916,445 
 
 
F-41
 
 
 
Basis of Amortization
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt issuance costs
Loan Terms
 $1,524,879 
 $1,144,518 
 
    
    
(Less) Accumulated amortization
 
  (453,369)
  (223,588)
 
    
    
Debt issuance costs - net
 
  1,071,510 
  920,930 
 
    
    
Notes payable - net
 
 $48,432,954 
 $42,995,515 
 
Total amortization expense of debt issuance costs charged to operations amounted to $229,781 and $192,956 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Such amounts have been included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
Future minimum principal payments are as follows:
 
Years Ending December 31
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
2018
 $10,957,783 
2019
  1,066,934 
2020
  1,105,633 
2021
  1,154,204 
2022
  3,442,951 
Thereafter
  31,776,959 
 
    
 
 $49,504,464 
 
Note 9 – Bonds Payable
 
The Company is offering 7% unsecured bonds at a purchase price of $1,000 per bond. The bonds, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 7% per annum, will mature on September 30, 2022. The bonds will continue to be sold through September 30, 2018 and the Company intends to use the bond proceeds to pay down existing indebtedness and to acquire additional commercial rental properties.
 
The bonds are issued under an Indenture Trust Agreement with UMB Bank as the trustee. The Indenture Trust Agreement places certain financial covenants on the Company.
 
Prepayment penalties for calling the bonds early are as follows: (a) 1.02 times the price to the public ($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or before September 30, 2019; (b) 1.0015 times the price to the public ($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or after September 30, 2019 but on or before September 30, 2020; and (b) 1.001 times the price to the public ($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or after September 30, 2020 but on or before September 30, 2021. See Note 11 for specific amounts payable to GK Development, Inc., a related party, as sponsor of the bonds.
 
Bonds payable is summarized as follows:
 
 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bonds Payable
 $7,113,000 
 $1,455,000 
 
 
Basis of Amortization
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bond Issuance Costs
Bond Term
  679,185 
  136,915 
 
    
    
(Less) Accumulated amortization
 
  (74,383)
  (2,041)
 
    
    
Deferred bond issuance costs - net
 
  604,802 
  134,874 
 
    
    
Bonds payable - net
 
 $6,508,198 
 $1,320,126 
 
Total amortization expense of bond issuance costs charged to operations amounted to $72,342 and $2,041 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively which amounts have been included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
 
F-42
 

Note 10 – Operating Leases
 
The rental properties have entered into leases with tenants which are classified as operating leases.
 
Approximate minimum base rentals to be received under these operating leases are as follows:
 
Years Ending December 31
 
 
 
2018
 $5,374,536 
2019
  3,888,707 
2020
  2,070,247 
2021
  1,575,336 
2022
  1,020,717 
Thereafter
  1,226,579 
 
    
 
 $15,156,122 
 
Several leases contain provisions for the tenants to pay additional rent to cover a portion of the Property's real estate taxes and defined operating expenses.
 
Lake Mead Partners, LLC
 
As of December 31, 2017, four tenants currently occupy 68.96% of the portion of the retail power center owned by LM Partners, representing approximately 16.08% of the future minimum base rental revenue under leases expiring on various dates between 2019 and 2020. These same tenants account for 31.18% and 49.39% of the minimum rents for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
 
Lake Mead Development, LLC
 
As of December 31, 2017, two tenants currently occupy 50.73% of the portion of the power center owned by LM Development, representing approximately 14.24% of the future minimum base rental revenue under leases expiring on various dates between 2022 and 2023. These same tenants account for 7.04% and 31.07% of the minimum rents for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
 
2700 Ygnacio, LLC
 
As of December 31, 2017, two tenants currently occupy 49.48% of the portion of the office building owned by Ygnacio, representing approximately 21.51% of the future minimum base rental revenue under leases expiring on various dates between 2019 and 2021. These same tenants account for 22.53% and 0% of the minimum rents for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
 
 
F-43
 
 
Note 11 – Related Party Transactions
 
Lake Mead Crossings and Ygnacio are managed by GK Development, Inc., an affiliate of one of the members of GKIH, under management agreements that provide for property management fees equal to 3% of gross monthly revenue collected for Lake Mead Crossings and 5% of gross monthly revenue collected for Ygnacio. In addition to these management services, GK Development, Inc. also provides services relating to the acquisition and disposition of real estate property and tenant leasing.
 
GK Development, Inc. is responsible for promoting the sale of the bonds and is entitled to receive a fee equal to 1.88% of the $50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $940,000. In addition, GK Development is entitled to receive a reimbursement of organization and offering expenses equal to 0.55% of the $50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $275,000 and a reimbursement of Blue-Sky filing fees equal to 0.15% of the $50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $75,000. In the aggregate, GK Development, Inc. is entitled to receive 2.58% of the gross bond proceeds received.
 
See Note 8 for the loans payable to (i) GK Development Inc., the Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds and (ii) GKSI IV, LLC, an entity managed by the Manager and the Sponsor of the Bonds.
 
With respect to related parties, amounts incurred consisted of the following:

 
 
2017
 
 
2016
 
GK Development, Inc.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Management fees (3% or 5% of gross collections)
 $229,570 
 $112,918 
Acquisition fees (2% of the purchase price)
  300,000 
  - 
Disposition fees (2% of the selling price)
  80,000 
  - 
Brokerage fees (1% of the selling price)
  40,000 
  - 
Leasing commissions - capitalized
  178,939 
  9,315 
Interest on loans
  164,068 
  114,279 
Bond issuance costs
  145,976 
  37,539 
 
  1,138,553 
  274,051 
 
GKSI IV, LLC
       
       
Interest on loans
  797,434 
  791,910 
Loan costs
  - 
  28,970 
 
  797,434 
  820,880 
 
    
    
 
 $1,935,987 
 $1,094,931 
 
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, $25,857 and $67,769, respectively, was owed to GK Development, Inc., and is included in due to affiliates on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Such amounts are in addition to the loan amount owed to GK Development, Inc., as discussed in Note 8.
 
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, $67,486 and $67,769, respectively, was owed to GKSI IV, LLC for unpaid accrued interest, which is included in accrued interest on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, GKSI IV, LLC was owed $199,570 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for unpaid accrued loan fees, which is included in accrued financing fees payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
 
F-44
 

Note 12 – Asset Acquisition of Rental Property
 
On December 22, 2016, the Company, through Ygnacio, entered into an assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement (“Assignment”), with GK Development, Inc., the Company’s Manager, and Sponsor, pursuant to which GK Development, Inc. assigned to Ygnacio that certain purchase and sale agreement, as amended, to acquire a three-story, Class A office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California. The acquisition closed on January 30, 2017 for a purchase price of $14,905,290 (excluding prorations). The primary reason for the acquisition was to realize the economic benefit of owning and operating a Class A office building. The results from the acquisition have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements since that date.
 
The following table summarizes the allocation of the assets and liabilities acquired at the date of acquisition:
 
Land and land improvements
 $10,353,173 
Rental property and improvements
  2,066,116 
Leasing commissions
  370,705 
Above-market leases
  372,258 
In-place leases
  1,935,645 
 
  15,097,897 
 
    
Below-market leases
  (192,607)
 
    
Net cash consideration
 $14,905,290 
 
Acquisition costs attributable to the acquisition of Ygnacio, which include acquisition fees and other closing fees totaled $369,574 for the year ended December 31, 2017. Such costs have been capitalized and included in rental properties on the accompany consolidated balance sheets. Acquisition costs of $3,489, attributable to the acquisition of Lake Mead Crossings, incurred during the year ended December 31, 2016 were charged to expense and are included on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The change in the accounting policy with respect to acquisition costs, results from the Company early adopting ASU 2017-01 in January 2017 (Note 1).
 
The fair value of total identifiable net assets was determined with the assistance of a third-party appraiser using the income approach methodology of valuation. The income approach methodology utilizes the remaining non-cancelable lease terms as defined in lease agreements, market rental data, and discount rates. This fair value, is based relying heavily on market observable data such as rent comparables, sales comparables, and broker indications, which are Level 2 inputs, as discussed in Note 5. Key assumptions include a capitalization rate of 7.5%, growth rates for market rentals of 3.0%, and a discount rate of 8.75%. The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired based on their relative fair market value.
 
Note 13 – Sale of Rental Property
 
The Company, through LM Partners, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Pacific Dental Services, LLC (“PDCS”), a current tenant in the rental property, in terms of which LM Partners agreed to sell to PDCS the building partially occupied by PDCS, containing approximately 7,790 leasable square feet, for $4,000,000 (excluding prorations). The sale closed on March 20, 2017, resulting in a gain on sale of the rental property of $1,738,882, which has been included in gain on sale of rental property on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017. $2,700,000 of the sale proceeds was used to reduce the outstanding principal balance on the Nevada State Bank loan and $980,000 of the sales proceeds was used to reduce the outstanding principal balance on the GK Development, Inc. loan.
 
The following table summarizes the gain on sale of the rental property:
 
Sales price
 $4,000,000 
Less Closing costs
  (381,095)
 
    
Net proceeds from sale
  3,618,905 
 
    
Less Net book value of property sold
  (1,880,023)
 
    
Gain on sale
 $1,738,882 
 
Note 14 – Subsequent Events
 
As of December 31, 2017, $7,113,000 of Bonds have been sold and through April 20, 2018, $9,323,000 have been sold.
 
The consolidated financial statements and related disclosures include evaluation of events up through and including April 20, 2018, which is the date the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued.
 
 
F-45
 
 
Independent Auditor’s Report
 
To the Management of GK Development, Inc.
Property Manager of
2700 Ygnacio Partners
Barrington, Illinois
 
Report on the Financial Statement
 
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenues and certain operating expenses of 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statement.
 
Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statement
 
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of this financial statement in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of this statement of revenues and certain operating expenses that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
 
Auditor’s Responsibility
 
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the statement of revenues and certain operating expenses based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the statement of revenues and certain operating expenses is free from material misstatement.
 
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the statement of revenues and certain operating expenses. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the statement of revenues and certain operating expenses, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the statement of revenues and certain operating expenses in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the statement of revenues and certain operating expenses.
 
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
 
Opinion
 
In our opinion, the statement of revenues and certain operating expenses referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the revenue and certain operating expenses described in Note 1 to the financial statement of 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2016, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
Basis of Accounting
 
As described in Note 1 to the financial statement, the statement of revenues and certain operating expenses has been prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not intended to be a complete presentation of 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC’s revenues and expenses. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
 
/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
 
Denver, Colorado
September 27, 2017

 
F-46
 
 
 
2700 Ygnacio
 
Statement of Revenues and Certain Operating Expenses
 
 
 
 
Year Ended
 
 
 
December 31,2016
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
 
 
 
Minimum rents
 $2,271,736 
Tenant recoveries
  40,850 
 
  2,312,586 
 
    
Operating Expenses
    
Other operating expenses
  677,045 
Real estate taxes
  164,545 
Insurance
  89,891 
 
  931,481 
 
    
Revenues in excess of certain operating expenses
 $1,381,105 
 
(See accompanying notes to financial statement)
 
 

 
F-47
 
 
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
 
Pacific 2700 Ygnacio Corporation, or the Seller, owned and operated a three-story, Class A office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California (the "Property"). The Property was sold to a wholly owned subsidiary of GK Investment Holdings, LLC (“GKIH”), or the Purchaser. The property is comprised of 107,970 rentable square feet of which approximately 90% is leased to numerous tenants under leases expiring on various dates between 2017 and 2022. The Purchaser purchased the Property on January 30, 2017, and assumed all management and ownership responsibilities.
 
The accompanying statement of revenues and certain direct operating expenses has been prepared in accordance with Rule 8-06 of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities act of 1933, as amended. Accordingly, the statement is not representative of the actual operations for the period presented as revenues and certain operating expenses, which may not be directly attributable to the revenues and expenses expected to be incurred in future operations of the Property, have been excluded. Such items include depreciation, amortization, management fees, interest expense, amortization of in-place leases, and amortization of above and below market leases. Other operating expenses include administrative and maintenance salaries, cleaning, landscaping, utilities and repairs and maintenance.
 
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Estimates - The preparation of this financial statement in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the amounts reported in the financial statement and related notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Rental Recognition – The Property’s leases with tenants are classified as operating leases. Rental income is recognized ratably over the term of the respective leases, inclusive of leases which provide for scheduled rent increases and rental concessions. Straight line rent adjustment included in minimum rents, reflected an increase in rental revenue on the statement of revenue and certain direct operating expenses in the amount of $122,151 for the year ended December 31, 2016.
 
Tenant Recoveries - During the term of their respective leases, certain of the tenants pay a pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses (as defined), over a base year. Estimated recoveries are recognized as revenue in the period the applicable expenses are incurred.
 
 
F-48
 
 
Note 3 – Lease
 
The Seller has entered into non-cancellable operating leases with tenants with various escalation terms as stated in the lease agreements. These leases have various expiration dates through February 28, 2022.
 
Approximate minimum base rentals to be received under these operating leases are as follows:
 
Year
 
Amount
 
 
 
 
 
2017
 $2,260,318 
2018
  1,840,233 
2019
  1,593,056 
2020
  525,967 
2021
  348,453 
Thereafter
  11,223 
 
    
Total
 $6,579,250 
 
As of December 31, 2016, three tenants currently occupy 64.90% of the office building, under leases expiring on various dates between 2017 and 2021. These same tenants account for 77.16% of minimum rents for the year ended December 31, 2016
 
Note 4 – Subsequent Events
 
Subsequent events were evaluated through September 27, 2017, the date the financial statement was available to be issued.
 
 
F-49
 
 
Appendix A
 
PRIOR PERFORMANCE TABLES
 
As used herein, the terms “we”, “our” and “us” refer to GK Investment Holdings, LLC.
 
The following Prior Performance Tables, or Tables, provide information relating to real estate investment programs sponsored by GK Development, Inc., or GK Development, or Prior Real Estate Programs, through December 31, 2016. All of the Prior Real Estate Programs presented in the Tables or otherwise discussed in the section entitled “Prior Performance Summary” in this Offering Circular are private programs that have no public reporting requirements. GK Development has not previously sponsored a public program.
 
As of December 31, 2016, GK Development was the sponsor of seven private programs that had closed offerings in the prior five years; none of which had investment objectives similar to our company. Of the seven prior private programs that closed offerings within the prior five years, we do not believe that any of them had similar investment objectives to our company because: (i) four of the programs were equity programs designed to invest in a single, identified asset and (ii) the remaining three programs were notes programs designed to make loans to identified affiliates of GK Development.
 
GK Development is responsible for the acquisition, financing, operation, maintenance and disposition of our investments. Key members of the management of GK Development will play a significant role in the promotion of this offering and the operation of our company. The financial results of the Prior Real Estate Programs may provide some indication of GK Development’s ability to perform its obligations. However, general economic conditions affecting the real estate industry and other factors contribute significantly to financial results.
 
As an investor in our Bonds, you will not own any interest in the Prior Real Estate Programs and should not assume that you will experience returns, if any, comparable to those experienced by investors in the Prior Real Estate Programs.
 
The following tables are included herein: 
 
Table I - Experience in Raising and Investing Funds;
 
Table II - Compensation to Sponsor;
 
Table III - Operating Results of Prior Programs; and
 
Table IV - Results of Completed Programs.
 
The information in these tables should be read together with the summary information under “Prior Performance Summary” in this Offering Circular.
 
 
A-1
 
 
TABLE I
EXPERIENCE IN RAISING AND INVESTING FUNDS
 
This Table I sets forth a summary of experience of GK Development, Inc. in raising and investing funds in Prior Real Estate Programs; the offerings of which have closed in the three years ended December 31, 2017. None of the Prior Real Estate Programs presented in this Table I have similar or identical investment objectives to GK Investment Holdings, LLC. Information is provided with regard to the manner in which the proceeds of the offerings have been applied. Also set forth is information pertaining to the timing and length of these offerings and the time period over which the proceeds have been invested in the properties. All figures are as of December 31, 2017. 
 
 
 
GK Secured Income Investments III, LLC
 
 
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
 
 
GKPI III, LLC
 
 
GK DST - Cedar Falls Grocery (Unaudited Tax Basis)
 
Dollar amount offered (in thousands)
 $11,200 
 $11,000 
 $10,000 
 $5,076 
Dollar amount raised (100%)
 $11,112 
 $11,280 
 $9,836 
 $5,076 
Less offering expenses (percentage):
    
    
    
    
Selling commissions and discounts retained by affiliates
  5.88%
  8.17%
  7.18%
  9.79%
Organizational expenses
  1.73%
  0.96%
  2.82%
  2.42%
Other (Syn, Mgmy., Mkting, Underwriting)
  1.20%
  0.00%
  0.27%
  0.00%
Percent available for investment
  91.20%
  90.87%
  89.73%
  87.79%
Acquisition costs:
    
    
    
    
Prepaid items and fees related to purchase of property
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Cash down payment for assets
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Acquisition fees
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Other (please explain)
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Total acquisition cost (in thousands)
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Percent leverage (mortgage financing divided by total acquisition cost)
  0.00%
  0.00%
  100.00%
  100.00%
Date offering began
 
10/15/14
 
10/1/15
7/30/15
7/10/16
Length of offering (months)
  10 
  6 
  14 
  12 
Months to invest 90% of amount available for investment (measured from beginning of offering
  7 
  3 
  11 
  12 
 
 
A-2
 
 
TABLE II
COMPENSATION TO SPONSOR
 
This Table II sets forth the types of compensation received by GK Development, Inc., and its affiliates, including compensation paid out of offering proceeds and compensation paid in connection with ongoing operations, in connection with six programs; the offerings of which have closed in the three years ended December 31, 2017. None of the Prior Real Estate Programs presented in this Table II have similar or identical investment objectives to GK Investment Holdings, LLC. All figures are as of December 31, 2017.
 
Types of Compensation
 
 
 
GK Secured Income Investments III, LLC
 
 
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
 
 
GKPI III, LLC
 
 
GK DST - Cedar Falls Grocery (Unaudited Tax Basis)
 
Date offering commenced
 
10/15/14
 
 
10/1/15
 
 
7/30/15
 
 
7/10/16
 
Dollar amount raised (in thousands)
 $11,112 
 $11,280 
 $9,836 
 $5,076 
Amount paid to sponsor from proceeds of offering:
    
    
    
    
Underwriting fees
 $115 
 $0 
 $22 
 $0 
Syndication Mgmnt Fee
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Acquisition fees
    
    
    
    
 – real estate commissions
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 – advisory fees
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 – other (property acquisition fee)
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Other
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Dollar amount of cash generated from operations before deducting payments to sponsor (in thousands)
 $2,623 
 $1,450 
 $2,318 
 $699 
Amount paid to sponsor from operations (in thousands):
    
    
    
    
Property management fees
 $0 
 $0 
 $344 
 $43 
Partnership management fees
 $0 
 $0 
 $86 
 $27 
Reimbursements
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Leasing commissions
 $0 
 $0 
 $158 
 $0 
Specialty Lease Commissions
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Other (Structuring Fee)
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Other (Guarantee Fee)
 $0 
 $0 
 $309 
 $0 
Other (Loan Management Fee)
 $170 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Other (Loan Origination Fee)
 $100 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Other (LLC Management Fee)
 $0 
 $0 
 $140 
 $0 
Dollar amount of property sales and refinancing before deducting payments to sponsor (in thousands)
    
    
    
    
 – cash
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 – notes
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Amount paid to sponsor from property sales and refinancing (in thousands):
    
    
    
    
Real estate commissions
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Incentive fees
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Other (Disposition Fee)
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 
 
A-3
 
 
TABLE III
ANNUAL OPERATING RESULTS OF PRIOR REAL ESTATE PROGRAMS
 
This Table III sets forth the annual operating results of Prior Real Estate Programs sponsored by GK Development, Inc. and its affiliates that have closed offerings during the five years ended December 31, 2017. None of the Prior Real Estate Programs presented in this Table III have similar or identical investment objectives to GK Investment Holdings, LLC. All figures are for the period commencing January 1 of the year acquired, except as otherwise noted.
 
Operating Results of Prior Programs
 
 
 
 
GK Preferred Income Investments I (Lakeview Square), LLC
 
 
GK Secured Income Investments I, LLC
 
 
GK Secured Income Investments III, LLC
 
 
GK Preferred Income II (Ridgmar), LLC
 
 
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
 
 
GKPI III, LLC
 
 
GK DST - Cedar Falls Grocery (Unaudited Tax Basis)
 
Gross Revenues (in thousands)
 
 $22,180 
 $3,489 
 $3,279 
 $5,454 
 $1,848 
 $8,904 
 $1,487 
Profit on sale of properties (in thousands)
 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 Less (in thousands):
Operating expenses
 $13,775 
 $574 
 $566 
 $2,013 
 $648 
 $4,750 
 $323 
Interest expense
 $2,189 
 $5 
 $0 
 $6,567 
 $0 
 $2,496 
 $440 
Depreciation and Amortization
 $3,451 
 $0 
 $0 
 $291 
 $0 
 $3,692 
 $25 
Net Income – GAAP Basis (in thousands)
 
 $2,765 
 $2,910 
 $2,713 
 $(3,417)
 $1,200 
 $(2,034)
 $699 
Taxable Income (in thousands)
 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
  – from operations
 
 $3,413 
 $2,793 
 $2,730 
 $(5,180)
 $1,543 
 $(454)
 $699 
  – from gain on sales
 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Cash generated from operations
 
 $5,739 
 $2,791 
 $2,623 
 $(8,267)
 $1,450 
 $2,318 
 $699 
Cash generated from sales
 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Cash generated from refinancing
 
 $4,013 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Cash generated from operations, sales and refinancing (in thousands)
 
 $9,752 
 $2,791 
 $2,623 
 $(8,267)
 $1,450 
 $2,318 
 $699 
Less (in thousands):
Cash distributions to investors
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
 – from operating cash flow
 $4,981 
 $2,674 
 $2,623 
 $0 
 $1,522 
 $1,114 
 $449 
 – from sales and refinancing
 $4,013 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 – from other
 $495 
 $24 
 $226 
 $5,055 
 $110 
 $4 
 $34 
Cash generated (deficiency) after cash distributions (in thousands)
 
 $263 
 $93 
 $(226)
 $(13,322)
 $(182)
 $1,200 
 $216 
Less:
Special items (not including sales and refinancing) (identify and quantify)
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
Cash generated (deficiency) after cash distributions and special items (in thousands)
 
 $263 
 $93 
 $(226)
 $(13,322)
 $(182)
 $1,200 
 $216 
Tax and Distribution Data Per $1,000 Invested
 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
Federal Income Tax Results:
 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
Ordinary income (loss)
 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
  – from operations
 
 $0.66 
 $0.38 
 $0.25 
 $(0.22)
 $0.14 
 $(0.05)
 $0.09 
  – from recapture
 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 Capital gain (loss)
 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
Cash Distributions to Investors Source (on GAAP basis) (in thousands)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
  – Investment income
 
 $4,312 
 $2,698 
 $2,849 
 $0 
 $1,632 
 $1,118 
 $483 
  – Return of capital
 
 $5,177 
 $0 
 $0 
 $5,055 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 Source (on cash basis) (in thousands)
 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
  – Sales
 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
  – Refinancing
 
 $4,013 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
  – Operations
 
 $4,981 
 $2,077 
 $2,623 
 $0 
 $1,522 
 $1,114 
 $449 
  – Other
 
 $495 
 $24 
 $226 
 $5,055 
 $110 
 $4 
 $34 
Amount (in percentage terms) remaining invested in program properties at the end of the last year reported in the Table (original total acquisition cost of properties retained divided by original total acquisition cost of all properties in program)
  0.00%
  100.00%
  0.00%
  100.00%
  100.00%
  100.00%
  100.00%
 
 
A-4
 
 
TABLE IV
RESULTS OF COMPLETED PROGRAMS
 
This Table IV sets forth the operating results of Prior Real Estate Programs sponsored by GK Development, Inc. and its affiliates that have completed during the five years ended December 31, 2016. None of the Prior Real Estate Programs presented in this Table IV have similar or identical investment objectives to GK Investment Holdings, LLC.
 
Results of Completed Programs
 
Program Name
 
Grand Center Partners (Unaudited - Tax Basis)
 
 
GDH Investments (North Ave) (Unaudited - Tax Basis)
 
 
GK Preferred Income Investments I (Lakeview Square), LLC
 
Dollar Amount Raised (in thousands)
 $2,410 
 $2,000 
 $5,450 
Number of Properties Purchased
  N/A 
  N/A 
  1 
Date of Closing of Offering
 
11/7/12
 
 
11/21/12
 
 
10/31/13
 
Date of First Sale of Property
 
1/16/14
 
 
11/13/13
 
 
12/31/17
 
Date of Final Sale of Property
 
1/16/14
 
 
11/13/13
 
 
12/31/17
 
Tax and Distribution Data Per $1,000 Investment Through… (in thousands)
    
    
    
Federal Income Tax Results:
    
    
    
 Ordinary income (loss)
    
    
    
  – from operations
 $0.04 
 $(0.15)
 $0.66 
  – from recapture
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
Capital Gain (loss)
 $0.28 
 $0.70 
 $0.00 
Deferred Gain
    
    
    
   Capital
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
   Ordinary
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
 $0.00 
Cash Distributions to Investors (in thousands)
    
    
    
 Source (on GAAP basis)
    
    
    
  – Investment income
 $814 
 $1,123 
 $4,312 
  – Return of capital
 $2,410 
 $2,000 
 $5,177 
Source (on cash basis)
    
    
    
  – Sales
 $2,604 
 $2,890 
 $0 
  – Refinancing
 $0 
 $0 
 $4,013 
  – Operations
 $620 
 $233 
 $4,981 
  – Other
 $0 
 $0 
 $495 
Receivables on Net Purchase Money Financing (in thousands)
 $0 
 $0 
 $0 
 
 
 
A-5
 

PART III - EXHIBITS
 
EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit Number
 
Exhibit Description
 
 
 
 
Managing Broker-Dealer Agreement by and between JCC Advisors, LLC and our company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (1)(a) to the Company’s Third Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on June 30, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Form of Participating Dealer Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (1)(b) to the Company’s Third Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on June 30, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Form of Wholesaling Dealer Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (1)(c) to the Company’s Third Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on June 30, 2016.
 
 
 
 
First Amendment to Managing Broker-Dealer Agreement by and between JCC Advisors, LLC and our company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (1)(d) to the Company’s Fourth Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on September 22, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Certificate of Formation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2)(a) to the Company’s Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on December 23, 2015.
 
 
 
 
Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2)(b) to the Company’s First Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on February 18, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Indenture between our company and the trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6, 2016.
 
 
 
 
First Supplemental Indenture between our company and the trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on November 22, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Form of Unsecured Bond, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(b) to the Company’s Fourth Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on September 22, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Subscription Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4) to the Company’s Second Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on May 5, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Forced Sale Agreement among our company, the trustee and 1551 Kingsbury Partners, L.L.C, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Forced Sale Agreement among our company, the trustee, and GKPI I Partners (Lakeview Square), LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Forced Sale Agreement among our company, the trustee, and Garo Kholamian, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Loan Agreement between our company and 1551 Kingsbury Partners, L.L.C., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Loan Agreement between our company and Garo Kholamian, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Loan Agreement between our company and GKPI I Partners (Lakeview Square), LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Subscription Escrow Agreement among our company, JCC Advisors, LLC and UMB Bank, National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6, 2016.
 
 
 
 
Consent of Eide Bailly LLP
 
 
 
(11)(b)
 
Consent of Kaplan, Voekler, Cunningham & Frank, PLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 12 to the Company’s Fifth Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on September 28, 2016.
 
 
 
(12)
 
Opinion of Kaplan, Voekler, Cunningham & Frank, PLC regarding legality of the Bonds, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (12) to the Company’s Fifth Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on September 28, 2016.
 

 
 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Regulation A, the issuer certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 1-A and has duly caused this offering statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the County of Cook, State of Illinois on September 28, 2018.
 
GK Investment Holdings, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company  
 
 
 
By:
GK Development, Inc.,  
 
an Illinois corporation, Manager    
 
 
By:
/s/ Garo Kholamian
 
 
Name:
Garo Kholamian
 
 
Its:
Sole Director
 
 
Date:
September 28, 2018
 
 
By:
/s/ Garo Kholamian
 
Name:
Garo Kholamian
 
Its:
President of our manager (Principal Executive Officer)  
Date:
September 28, 2018
 
 
    
 
By:
/s/ Colin Hartzell
 
Name:
Colin Hartzell
 
Its:
Vice President of Financial Planning and Control of our manager
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date:
September 28, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
EX1A-11 CONSENT 3 gk_ex11a.htm CONSENT Blueprint
 
Exhibit 11(a)
 
Consent of Independent Auditors
 
The consolidated financial statements of GK Investment Holdings, LLC as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and for the years then ended, included in Appendix F of the post-qualification amendment to the Regulation A, Tier II Bond Offering have been audited by Eide Bailly LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report appearing herein.
 
The statement of revenues and certain operating expenses of 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC for the year then ended December 31, 2016, included in Appendix F of the post-qualification amendment to the Regulation A, Tier II Bond Offering have been audited by Eide Bailly LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report appearing herein.
 
We consent to the inclusion in the post-qualification to the Regulation A, Tier II Bond Offering of our reports, dated April 20, 2018 and September 27, 2017, respectively, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of GK Investment Holdings, LLC, and on our audit of the statement of revenues and certain operating expenses of 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC.
 
/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
 
Denver, Colorado
September 28, 2018