Blueprint
An offering statement pursuant to Regulation A relating to these
securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Information contained in this Preliminary Offering
Circular is subject to completion or amendment. These securities
may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted before the
offering statement filed with the Commission is qualified. This
Preliminary Offering Circular shall not constitute an offer to sell
or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor may there be any sales
of these securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation
or sale would be unlawful before registration or qualification
under the laws of any such state. We may elect to satisfy our
obligation to deliver a Final Offering Circular by sending you a
notice within two business days after the completion of our sale to
you that contains the URL where the Offering Circular was filed may
be obtained.
Preliminary Offering Circular
September 28, 2018
Subject to Completion
GK INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC
257 East Main Street, Suite 200
Barrington, IL 60010
(847) 277-9930
7% Unsecured Bonds
$50,000,000 Maximum Offering Amount (50,000 Bonds)
$5,000 Minimum Purchase (5 Bonds)
Explanatory Note
This Offering Circular is part of the postqualification amendment
we filed in order to update the financial statements contained
herein in accordance with Rule 252(f)(2)(i) of Regulation A. In
addition to updating the financial statements presented herein,
this amendment updates portfolio, financial and statistical data,
and extends the offering termination date to September 30, 2019.
All material terms of this offering otherwise remain the
same.
GK Investment Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, referred to herein as our company, is offering
7% unsecured bonds, or the Bonds. The purchase price per Bond is
$1,000, with a minimum purchase amount of $5,000.
We may issue Bonds
at volume-weighted discounts to certain investors. See “Plan
of Distribution – Volume-Weighted Discount” for more
information. The Bonds will
mature on September 30, 2022 and will bear interest at a fixed rate
of 7% per annum. Interest on the Bonds will be paid monthly on the
15th day of the month. The first interest payment on a Bond will be
paid on the 15th day of the
month following the issuance of such Bond. The Bonds will be
offered to prospective investors on a best efforts basis by our
Managing BrokerDealer, JCC Advisors, LLC, or JCC. “Best
efforts” means that JCC is not obligated to purchase any
specific number or dollar amount of Bonds, but will use its best
efforts to sell the Bonds. JCC may engage additional brokerdealers,
or Selling Group Members, who are members of the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, to assist in the sale of the Bonds.
At each closing date, the proceeds for such closing will be
disbursed to our company and Bonds relating to such proceeds will
be issued to their respective investors. We commenced the sale of
the Bonds on September 30, 2016. The offering will continue through
the earlier of September 30, 2019 or the date upon which all
$50,000,000 in offering proceeds have been received. As of the date
of this Offering Circular, we have sold 19,458 Bonds, or
$19,458,000, in the offering.
|
|
|
Managing
Broker-Dealer Fee, Commissions and Expense
Reimbursements(1)(2)
|
|
Proceeds to
Other Persons
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
Bond:
|
$1,000.00(3)
|
$81.20
|
$918.80
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Offering
Amount:
|
$50,000,000.00
|
$4,060,000.00
|
$45,940,000.00
|
$0
|
_________
|
(1)
|
This
includes selling commissions of 5% and a Managing Broker-Dealer Fee
of up to 3% of the gross proceeds of this offering to be paid on
Bonds offered on a best efforts basis. All such amounts will be
paid to JCC, who may reallow up to the entire amount of selling
commissions and Managing-Broker Dealer Fee to Selling Group
Members. JCC shall be entitled to retain, out of the Managing
Broker-Dealer Fee, an amount equal to 0.57% of the gross proceeds
of the offering. JCC may re-allow and pay to wholesalers and other
participants in the offering up to the entirety of the remaining
2.43% portion of the Managing Broker-Dealer Fee. Any amount of the
Managing Broker-Dealer Fee in excess of the 0.57% JCC is entitled
to retain that is not re-allowed shall be returned to the Issuer.
This also includes due diligence expense reimbursements of up to
$60,000, 0.12% of the maximum offering amount. See “Use of
Proceeds” and “Plan of
Distribution” for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
The
table above does not include anticipated organizational and
offering expenses of $275,000, blue sky fees of $75,000 and a
promotional fee of 1.88% of the gross proceeds of this offering
($940,000 if the maximum offering amount is sold) to be paid to GK
Development, Inc. in compensation for promoting this
offering.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Assumes no Bonds are sold at a discount
|
Generally,
no sale may be made to you in this offering if the aggregate
purchase price you pay is more than 10% of the greater of your
annual income or net worth. Different rules apply to accredited
investors and non-natural persons. Before making any representation
that your investment does not exceed applicable thresholds, we
encourage you to review Rule 251(d)(2)(i)(C) of Regulation A. For
general information on investing, we encourage you to refer to
www.investor.gov.
An
investment in the Bonds is subject to certain risks and should be
made only by persons or entities able to bear the risk of and to
withstand the total loss of their investment. Currently, there is
no market for the Bonds being offered, nor does our company
anticipate one developing. Prospective investors should carefully
consider and review that risk as well as the RISK FACTORS beginning
on page 8 of this Offering Circular.
THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, OR THE
COMMISSION, DOES NOT PASS UPON THE MERITS OR GIVE ITS APPROVAL TO
ANY SECURITIES OFFERED OR THE TERMS OF THE OFFERING, NOR DOES IT
PASS UPON THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OFFERING
CIRCULAR OR OTHER SELLING LITERATURE. THESE SECURITIES ARE OFFERED
PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION WITH THE COMMISSION;
HOWEVER, THE COMMISION HAS NOT MADE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION
THAT THE SECURITIES OFFERED ARE EXEMPT FROM
REGISTRATION.
FORM S-11 DISCLOSURE FORMAT IS BEING FOLLOWED.
The date of this Offering Circular is September 28,
2018.
|
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
OFFERING CIRCULAR SUMMARY
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
RISK FACTORS
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
USE OF PROCEEDS
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
GENERAL INFORMATION AS TO OUR COMPANY
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
POLICY WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
INVESTMENT POLICIES OF OUR COMPANY
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF REAL ESTATE
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF BONDS
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
SELECTION, RETENTION AND CUSTODY OF COMPANY’S
INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
COMPENSATION OF OUR MANAGER AND ITS AFFILIATES
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
EXPERTS
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
LEGAL MATTERS
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
APPENDIX
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
OFFERING CIRCULAR SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this
Offering Circular. This summary does not contain all of the
information that you should consider before deciding whether to
invest in our Bonds. You should carefully read this entire Offering
Circular, including the information under the heading “Risk
Factors” and all information included in the Offering
Circular.
Our Company. GK Investment Holdings, LLC
was formed on September 14, 2015 to acquire existing income
producing commercial rental properties. Our company, through
wholly-owned subsidiaries, holds title to (i) a commercial rental
property located in Henderson, Nevada, and more commonly known as
Lake Mead Crossing; and (ii) an office building located at the
corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek,
California, or 2700 Ygancio.
Upon
acquisition, Lake Mead Crossing consisted of multiple buildings
aggregating approximately 221,200 square feet of rentable
commercial space. Lake Mead Crossing is part of a larger shopping
center, anchored by a Target. Lake Mead Crossing is owned by two of
our subsidiaries. Upon acquisition, Lake Mead Partners, LLC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Lake Mead Parent, LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of our company, owned a portion of Lake Mead Crossing
consisting of approximately 155,100 square feet of rentable
commercial space. Upon acquisition, Lake Mead Development, LLC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of our company, owned the other portion of
Lake Mead Crossing consisting of approximately 66,000 square feet
of rentable commercial space.
On
January 30, 2017, our Company, through 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Company, or Ygnacio Partners,
acquired 2700 Ygnacio, from an unaffiliated seller. 2700 Ygnacio is
a three-story, Class A office building with approximately 108,000
rentable square feet. As of June 30, 2018, it is 77.98% leased to
numerous tenants under leases expiring on various dates between
2018 and 2022. Corrollo Engineers is the anchor tenant on the
property, occupying 37,156 rentable square feet, or 34.41% of the
property, under a lease currently scheduled to expire on October
31, 2019.
After
the acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing, the Company, through LM
Partners, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Pacific
Dental Services, LLC, or PDCS, a former tenant in Lake Mead
Crossing, whereby LM Partners agreed to sell to PDCS the building
partially occupied by PDCS, containing approximately 7,800 rentable
square feet, for $4,000,000, excluding prorations. The sale closed
on March 20, 2017 and sale proceeds were used to pay down existing
indebtedness related to our acquisition of Lake Mead
Crossing.
As
of June 30, 2018, the portion of Lake Mead Crossing owned by LM
Partners is 97.2% leased and the portion of Lake Mead Crossing
owned by LM Development is 52.5% leased.
Mr.
Garo Kholamian is the beneficial owner of 67.81% of the outstanding
units of our company, and his wife, Mrs. Nancy Kholamian, is the
beneficial owner of 12.61% of the outstanding units of our company.
Our company is solely managed by GK Development, Inc., or GK
Development or our manager. GK Development was formed on May 19,
1994 under the laws of Illinois, and Mr. Garo Kholamian is the sole
director and shareholder of GK Development. As a result, Mr. Garo
Kholamian will effectively manage our company.
Our
company does not intend to act as a land developer in that it is
has no intent to invest in, acquire, own, hold, lease, operate,
manage, maintain, redevelop, sell or otherwise use undeveloped real
property or “raw land,” as a ground up development. Our
company, engaging in its commercial real estate activities, may
have the opportunity to acquire commercial real property which
includes unimproved pad sites for future development and lease-up
opportunities. In such instances, our company will retain the
unimproved pad sites for ground lease, build-to-suit and/or sell
opportunities. In situations where our company has the opportunity
to acquire commercial real property which includes a large tract of
developable raw land, the developable raw land will not be acquired
by our company, but may be acquired by an entity affiliated with GK
Development. Our company may choose to redevelop real property for
an alternative use than intended when originally acquired or
developed.
Our
company is focused on investments in existing, income producing
commercial rental properties that will benefit from GK
Development’s real estate operating and leasing skills,
including releasing, redeveloping, renovating, refinancing,
repositioning, and selling. GK Development intends to actively
participate in the management of our company’s properties
rather than hold the properties as passive
investments.
Certain
affiliates of GK Development have agreed to loan us all cash flows
received from equity interests they own in certain real property
located at 5775 Beckley Road, Battle Creek, Michigan 49015 and more
commonly known as Lakeview Square Mall, or Lakeview Square, and
that certain real property located at 1888 Green Oaks Road, Fort
Worth, Texas 76116 and more commonly known as Ridgmar Mall, or
Ridgmar, in order to ensure we have sufficient reserves of cash and
cash equivalents to fund 120% of our debt service obligations under
the terms of the Bonds, or the Bond Service Obligations, for a
period of three (3) months. The affiliates of GK Development that
have agreed to lend us the cash flows received from Lakeview Square
and Ridgmar are (i) Garo Kholamian and GKPI I Partners (Lakeview
Square), LLC, or the Lakeview Lenders, which own an indirect 72%
interest in Lakeview Square, and (ii) 1551 Kingsbury Partners,
L.L.C., or Ridgmar Lender, which owns an indirect 12.5% interest in
Ridgmar. Ridgmar Lender and Lakeview Lenders, together with any
future parties to a Cash Flow Loan Agreement are referred to herein
as, the Cash Flow Lenders. See “Description of Bonds -
Certain Covenants” for more information.
Management. The sponsor of our company,
GK Development, is a Barrington, Illinois based real estate
acquisition and development company specializing in the
acquisition, management, and redevelopment of commercial rental
properties. Its management provides years of experience
successfully acquiring, redeveloping and managing commercial rental
properties. Mr. Garo Kholamian is the President and founder of GK
Development. Prior to GK Development, Mr. Kholamian was Senior Vice
President of Development for Homart Development Co., the real
estate development arm of Sears Roebuck. In this position, he was
instrumental in the development of shopping centers across the
United States. See “Directors and Executive
Officers” for more information on Mr. Kholamian and
the seven other individuals responsible for the management of GK
Development.
The Offering.
Our company is offering to investors
the opportunity to purchase up to a maximum of $50,000,000 of
Bonds. See “Plan of
Distribution Who May
Invest” for further
information. We commenced the sale of the Bonds on September 30,
2016. As of the date of this Offering Circular, we have sold 19,548
Bonds, or $19,548,000, in the offering. The offering will continue
through the earlier of September 30, 2019 or the date upon which
all $50,000,000 in offering proceeds have been received, or the
Offering Termination. Our company will conduct closings in this
offering at its discretion, or the Closing Dates and each, a
Closing Date, until the Offering Termination. On each Closing Date,
offering proceeds for that closing will be disbursed to our company
and the respective Bonds will be issued to investors in the
offering, or the Bondholders. The offering is being made on a
bestefforts basis through JCC.
|
Issuer
|
|
GK
Investment Holdings, LLC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Offered
|
|
$50,000,000,
aggregate principal amount of the Bonds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
September
30, 2022.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
7% per
annum computed on the basis of a 365-day year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Payment Dates
|
|
Commencing
on the 15th of the month
following the issuance of such Bond and continuing
monthly until the Maturity Date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price to Public
|
|
$1,000
per Bond.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ranking
|
|
The
Bonds are senior unsecured indebtedness of our company. They
rank equally with our other senior unsecured indebtedness and
are effectively subordinated to our secured indebtedness and
structurally subordinated to all indebtedness of our
subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume-Weighted Discount
|
|
We are offering a volume-weighted discount to the Price to the
Public, or the Discount, for certain purchases of Bonds. The
Discount is as follows:
|
|
|
Purchase
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
20-29
Bonds
|
3%
|
$970
|
|
|
30-39
Bonds
|
4%
|
$960
|
|
|
40
or more Bonds
|
5%
|
$950
|
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
We
estimate that the net proceeds from this offering, after deducting
the estimated offering costs and expenses payable by our company,
will be approximately $44,650,000. This assumes that we sell the
maximum offering amount without the application of the Discount. We
intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to pay down
existing indebtedness and acquire commercial rental properties in
our target asset class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain Covenants
|
|
The Bonds are being issued under an indenture, or the Indenture,
dated as of September 30, 2016, between us and UMB Bank, as the
trustee. The Indenture contains covenants that limit our ability to
incur, or permit our subsidiaries to incur, third party
indebtedness if certain debt to asset value and/or interest
coverage ratios would be exceeded. These covenants are subject to a
number of important exceptions, qualifications, limitations and
specialized definitions. See “Description
of Company’s Securities Certain Covenants” in this Offering Circular. The Bonds will
be unsecured. however, our company will be required to own real
property with aggregate equity value of at least 70% of the
outstanding principal of the Bonds, or the EquityBond Ratio. For
properties owned or acquired, directly or indirectly, by our
company, the equity value for purposes of the EquityBond Ratio will
initially be the equity invested into the applicable property. Each
property will be required to be appraised, by an independent third
party appraiser, annually during the term of the Bonds, and
following any such appraisal, our company’s equity value from
a newly appraised property will be adjusted to equal the appraised
value of the property less the outstanding indebtedness secured by
such property (and multiplied by our company’s ownership
interest in the applicable property in the event we acquire a
partial interest in any property). Our company will also be
required to retain cash and cash equivalents, as defined by GAAP,
equal to at least 120% of our company’s Bond Service
Obligations for a period of three (3) months, or the Cash Coverage
Ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forced Sale Agreements
|
|
Our
company may be a party to certain agreements with UMB Bank and
certain of GK Development's affiliates, whereby the trustee will be
able to force the sale of the property underlying such agreement as
a remedy if our company defaults on the Bonds, the trustee (or the
bondholders if permitted) accelerates the maturity of the Bonds,
and our company is otherwise unable to pay off the Bonds, in order
to comply with the Equity-Bond Ratio. We refer to any such
agreements as Forced Sale Agreements. During the pendency of
any Forced Sale Agreements, the value of the equity in the
underlying properties shall be included in the equity of our
company for the purposes of calculating the Equity-Bond
Ratio.
|
|
Cash Flow Loans
|
|
In
order to assist us in meeting the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant, the
Cash Flow Lenders have agreed that they will loan us up to all of
the monthly cash flow received from their respective ownership
interests in Ridgmar, Lakeview Square or any other equity interest
subject to a Cash Flow Loan, upon our request and representation to
them that we need such funds in order to comply with the Cash
Coverage Ratio. We refer to any such loan as a Cash Flow Loan. The
Cash Flow Loans will bear interest at the IRS imputed rate of
interest and will mature on the Maturity Date. Nothing in the
agreements governing the Cash Flow Loans precludes the sale of the
equity ownership of the Cash Flow Lenders, or the real properties
underlying them to third parties, and you will have no right
to any proceeds of any such sale. However, we may enter into
additional Cash Flow Loans with other affiliates of GK
Development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change of Control - Offer to Purchase
|
|
If a
Change of Control Repurchase Event as defined under
“Description of Bonds -
Certain Covenants” in this Offering Circular, occurs,
we must offer to repurchase the Bonds at 1.02 times the Price to
Public if on or before September 30, 2019; 1.015 times the Price to
Public if such event occurs after September 30, 2019 but on or
before the September 30, 2020; 1.01 times the Price to Public if
such event occurs after September 30, 2020 but on or before
September 30, 2021; and at the Price to Public if such event occurs
after September 30, 2021, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to,
but not including the repurchase date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optional Redemption
|
|
Prepayment
penalties for calling Bonds early are as follows: Any accrued and
unpaid interest up to but not including the repurchase rate plus
1.02 times the Price to Public if such event occurs on or before
September 30, 2019; 1.015 times the Price to Public if such event
occurs after September 30, 2019 but on or before September 30,
2020; 1.01 times the Price to Public if such event occurs after
September 30, 2020 but on or before September 30, 2021; or at the
Price to Public if such event occurs after September 30, 2021. See
“Description of Bonds
– Optional Redemption” for more information. In
addition, due to death or incapacity, the Bondholders may be able
to request a redemption of some or all of their Bonds. See
“Description of Bonds
– Redemption Upon Death or Disability” for more
information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Default
|
|
The
Indenture contains events of default, the occurrence of which
may result in the acceleration of our obligations under the Bonds
in certain circumstances. Events of Default, (as defined herein)
other than payment defaults, are subject to our company’s
right to cure within 120 days of such Event of Default. Our
company has the right to cure any payment default within 30
days before the trustee may declare a default and exercise the
remedies under the indenture. See “Description of
Company’s Securities - Event of Default” for
more information.
|
|
Form
|
|
The
Bonds are evidenced by global bond certificates deposited with
nominee holders. The nominee holders are the Depository Trust
Company, or DTC, or its nominee, Cede & Co., for those
purchasers purchasing through a DTC participant subsequent to the
Bonds gaining DTC eligibility and Direct Transfer LLC, or Direct
Transfer, for those purchasers not purchasing through a DTC
participant. See “Description of
Company’s Securities - Book-Entry, Delivery and
Form” for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominations
|
|
We will
issue the Bonds only in denominations of $1,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Principal and Interest
|
|
Principal
and interest on the Bonds will be payable in U.S. dollars or other
legal tender, coin or currency of the United States of
America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Issuances
|
|
We may,
from time to time, without notice to or consent of the Bondholders,
increase the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds outstanding by
issuing additional bonds in the future with the same terms of the
Bonds, except for the issue date and offering price, and such
additional bonds shall be consolidated with the Bonds and form a
single series.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity
|
|
This is
a Tier 2, Regulation A offering where the offered securities will
not be listed on a registered national securities exchange upon
qualification. This offering is being conducted pursuant to an
exemption from registration under Regulation A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended. We may apply for these qualified
securities to be eligible for quotation on an alternative trading
system or over the counter market, if we determine that such market
is appropriate given the structure of the Bonds and our company and
our business objectives. There is no guarantee that the
Bonds will be publicly listed or quoted or that a market will
develop for them. Please review carefully “Risk Factors - Investment
Risk” for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trustee, Registrar and Paying Agent
|
|
We have
designated UMB Bank as paying agent for the Bonds and Direct
Transfer LLC as sub-paying agent in respect of Bonds registered to
it. UMB Bank will act as trustee under the Indenture and
registrar for the Bonds. The Bonds are being issued in
book-entry form only, evidenced by global certificates, as such,
payments are being made to DTC, its nominee or to Direct
Transfer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
The
Indenture and the Bonds are governed by the laws of the State
of Delaware.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material Tax Considerations
|
|
You
should consult your tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal income
tax consequences of owning the Bonds in light of your own specific
situation, as well as consequences arising under the laws of any
other taxing jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
We
expect that any equity in a property that is subject to a Forced
Sale Agreement may be financed using debt. We expect the terms of
such debt to provide that the borrower will be in default if the
ownership interest in the property, directly or indirectly, changes
without lender consent. We expect that under terms of such loans,
if the borrower is in default, the lender has the ability to
accelerate the debt and charge certain penalties payable by the
borrower. As a result, it may not be possible or it may be
prohibitively expensive to sell the equity subject to a Forced Sale
Agreement without lender consent. See “Risk Factors – Risks
Related to the Offering – The Effectiveness of our
trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced
Sale Agreement and call the loans of Lake Mead Crossing, 2700
Ygnacio and future acquired properties may be limited by covenants
and penalties in debt documents for senior mortgages secured by the
respective underlying properties” and
“Risk
Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Our
trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a
Forced Sale Agreement may be limited due to covenants contained in
the senior and mezzanine debt secured by those
properties” for more information.
The existing
Cash Flow Loan Agreements and any future Forced Sale
Agreements or Cash Flow Loan Agreements are not expected to limit
the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders, or any other holder of equity
subject to such an agreement, to sell their equity, nor do
those agreements preclude a sale of the underlying real properties.
In either circumstance, we would lose our rights to Cash Flow Loans
relative to the interest sold, and the value of the interest sold
would no longer be available to support the Equity-Bond Ratio or
the repayment of the Bonds in the event the trustee exercised its
rights under the Forced Sale Agreements. See “Risk Factors – Risks
Related to the Offering – Neither any future Forced
Sale Agreements nor any current or future Cash Flow Loan
Agreements limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders to sell their
indirect equity in Lakeview Square, Ridgmar, or any equity subject
to a future Forced Sale Agreement or Cash Flow Loan to an
unaffiliated third party, nor do they preclude the sale of the
underlying real properties” for more
information.
We may
enter into Forced Sale Agreements with affiliates. If we do, we
anticipate the terms of the Forced Sale Agreements to be
substantially similar to the expired Forced Sale
Agreements related to Ridgmar and Lakeview Square, which were
filed as exhibits to our Current Report on Form 1-U, filed with the
SEC on October 6, 2016. As a result, the risks associated with the
Forced Sale Agreements are expected to include, but not be limited
to (i) the inability to effectively sell the affected equity due to
restrictions contained in the underlying senior and
mezzanine debt documents, (ii) the ability of the property
owner to sell the property without the consent of the
trustee, and (iii) the ability of the holder of the affected
equity to sell the affected equity without the consent of the
trustee.
An
investment in our Bonds involves certain risks. You should
carefully consider the risks above, as well as the other risks
described under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 6 of
this Offering Circular before making an investment
decision.
|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
Offering Circular contains certain forward-looking statements that
are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking
statements are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking
terminology such as “may,” “will,”
“should,” “potential,”
“intend,” “expect,” “outlook,”
“seek,” “anticipate,”
“estimate,” “approximately,”
“believe,” “could,” “project,”
“predict,” or other similar words or expressions.
Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions,
discuss future expectations, describe future plans and strategies,
contain financial and operating projections or state other
forward-looking information. Our ability to predict results or the
actual effect of future events, actions, plans or strategies is
inherently uncertain. Although we believe that the expectations
reflected in our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable
assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ
materially from those set forth or anticipated in our
forward-looking statements. Factors that could have a material
adverse effect on our forward-looking statements and upon our
business, results of operations, financial condition, funds derived
from operations, cash flows, liquidity and prospects include, but
are not limited to, the factors referenced in this Offering
Circular, including those set forth below.
When
considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the
risk factors and other cautionary statements in this Offering
Circular. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any
of these forward-looking statements, which reflect our views as of
the date of this Offering Circular. The matters summarized below
and elsewhere in this Offering Circular could cause our actual
results and performance to differ materially from those set forth
or anticipated in forward-looking statements. Accordingly, we
cannot guarantee future results or performance. Furthermore, except
as required by law, we are under no duty to, and we do not intend
to, update any of our forward-looking statements after the date of
this Offering Circular, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise.
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our Bonds is highly speculative and is suitable
only for persons or entities that are able to evaluate the risks of
the investment. An investment in our Bonds should be made only by
persons or entities able to bear the risk of and to withstand the
total loss of their investment. Prospective investors should
consider the following risks before making a decision to purchase
our Bonds. To the best of our knowledge, we have included all
material risks to investors in this section.
Risks Related to the Offering
The Bonds are unsecured obligations of our company and not
obligations of our subsidiaries and are subordinated to any of our
company’s current and future secured indebtedness to the
extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness and
effectively subordinated to any future obligations of our
company’s subsidiaries. Structural subordination increases
the risk that we will be unable to meet our obligations on the
Bonds.
The
Bonds are unsecured, subordinated obligations of our company and
will rank equally in right of payment with all of our
company’s other unsecured indebtedness and senior in right of
payment to any of our company’s future obligations that are
by their terms expressly subordinated or junior in right of payment
to the Bonds. The Bonds are effectively subordinated to any of our
company’s existing or future secured indebtedness to the
extent of the value of the assets securing such
indebtedness.
The
Bonds are obligations exclusively of our company and not of any of
its subsidiaries. None of our company’s subsidiaries is a
guarantor of the Bonds and the Bonds are not required to be
guaranteed by any subsidiaries our company may acquire or create in
the future. The Bonds are also effectively subordinated to all of
the liabilities of our company’s subsidiaries, to the extent
of their assets, since they are separate and distinct legal
entities with no obligation to pay any amounts due under our
company’s indebtedness, including the Bonds, or to make any
funds available to make payments on the Bonds. Our company’s
right to receive any assets of any subsidiary in the event of a
bankruptcy or liquidation of the subsidiary, and therefore the
right of our company’s creditors to participate in those
assets, will be effectively subordinated to the claims of that
subsidiary’s creditors, including trade creditors, in each
case to the extent that our company is not recognized as a creditor
of such subsidiary. In addition, even where our company is
recognized as a creditor of a subsidiary, our company’s
rights as a creditor with respect to certain amounts are
subordinated to other indebtedness of that subsidiary, including
secured indebtedness to the extent of the assets securing such
indebtedness.
Our covenants require only a 70% real property equity to principal
ratio; therefore, if our trustee were to exercise its remedy to
force the sale of our properties, such a sale may not generate
sufficient proceeds to repay the aggregate principal amount of the
Bonds.
One of
our trustee’s and Bondholders’ principal remedies in
the event of a default is to force the sale of the rental
properties we acquire, or any equity interest subject to a Forced
Sale Agreement. Under the Indenture we must maintain a ratio of 70%
equity (inclusive of those equity interests subject to the Forced
Sale Agreements) to the principal amount of outstanding Bonds,
subject to our right to cure any deficiency within one hundred
twenty (120) days of the occurrence of such deficiency. See
“Description of Bonds -
Event of Default” for more information. Because the
amount of real property equity we are required to maintain will not
cover the full principal amount of the Bonds, if we default on the
Bonds and our trustee forces a sale of our real property, or
exercises its rights under the Forced Sale Agreements, the proceeds
of such sales may not be sufficient to fully repay the outstanding
Bondholders.
The Bonds do not restrict or eliminate our company’s or its
subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional debt or take other
action that could negatively impact holders of the
Bonds.
Subject
to specified limitations in the Indenture and as described under
“Description of Bonds -
Certain Covenants,” the Indenture does not contain any
provisions that would directly limit our company’s ability or
the ability of its subsidiaries to incur indebtedness, including
indebtedness that would be senior to the Bonds. The only limitation
on our company’s or its subsidiaries’ ability to take
on additional debt is the requirement to maintain our Equity-Bond
Ratio.
The Effectiveness of our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of
equity subject to a Forced Sale Agreement and call the loans of
Lake Mead Crossing, 2700 Ygancio and future acquired properties may
be limited by covenants and penalties in debt documents for senior
mortgages secured by the respective underlying
properties.
Our
Bonds are unsecured and the primary remedy in the event of a
default will be for our trustee (or sufficient Bondholders) to
trigger sales of properties we own or any equity interest subject
to a Forced Sale Agreement. We expect that any such properties may
be financed with debt and that the terms of such debt will require
that the ownership interest of such property, directly or
indirectly, cannot change without lender’s consent. If the
ownership changes without lender consent, the respective borrower
under the respective loan will be in default. If either of the
direct or indirect owners of such a property is found to be in
default under any loans, your investment will be adversely
affected. Lake Mead Crossing was financed using mortgage debt,
mezzanine debt and interim debt. The loan documents evidencing both
the mortgage debt and mezzanine debt carry prepayment penalties.
2700 Ygnacio was financed using mortgage debt and interim debt. The
loan documents evidencing the mortgage debt carry prepayment
penalties. Further, on newly acquired properties by our company
following this Offering, we anticipate using senior secured debt to
acquire each new property we purchase. Often senior lender loans
secured by real property contain prepayment penalties and/or
requirements of defeasance. Any such prepayment penalties or
defeasance requirements may reduce the proceeds of any forced sale
of our properties or may render such a sale prohibitively
expensive. This would materially and adversely affect the repayment
of your investment in the event of a default.
Lake Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio were purchased
using a mixture of mortgage debt, mezzanine debt and
interim debt. Due to prepayment penalties on the mortgage debt and
mezzanine debt, we may be unable to pay down a portion of the
indebtedness secured by the property.
Our
company may use offering proceeds to pay down existing indebtedness
secured by Lake Mead Crossing. More specifically, it may be prudent
for our company to use offering proceeds to pay down the mezzanine
debt held by an affiliate of our company. The mezzanine debt
carries an interest rate of 8% and has a current outstanding
principal balance of approximately $6,417,483. However, if we
prepay the mezzanine debt, we may be required to pay prepayment
penalties equal to 12-14% of the principal prepaid. If we are
required to pay the prepayment penalty, we may not be able to or
may not be willing to pay off that indebtedness. If we do not pay
off our mezzanine debt, our debt service obligations may reduce our
ability to make payments on the Bonds.
Our
company may also use proceeds from this offering to pay down
mortgage debt. Lake Mead Partners, LLC is a party to a mortgage
loan secured by Lake Mead Crossing. That mortgage debt carries an
interest rate of 4% and has a principal of approximately
$25,537,783. However, if we prepay that debt, we may be required to
pay prepayment penalties equal to 1% of the principal prepaid. If
we are required to pay the prepayment penalty, we may not be able
to or may not be willing to pay off that indebtedness. If we do not
pay off that debt, our debt service obligations may reduce our
ability to make payments on the Bonds.
The cash flow indirectly received from Lake Mead Crossing and 2700
Ygnacio will be significantly impacted by the debt burden on the
property.
We
financed the purchase of Lake Mead Crossing using no equity and
three layers of debt financing (mortgage debt, mezzanine debt and
interim debt). We financed 2700 Ygnacio with limited equity and two
layers of debt financing. We are required to make the debt service
payments on each of these loans before making distributions to
Bondholders. The debt burden is substantially higher on Lake Mead
Crossing due to the amount of debt and the high interest rate on
the mezzanine debt and interim debt. As a result, our ability to
make payments to Bondholders when they become due may be adversely
affected by the debt burden on Lake Mead Crossing and 2700
Ygnacio.
If we sell substantially less than all of the Bonds we are
offering, our investment objectives may become more difficult to
reach.
While we believe we will be able to reach our investment objectives
regardless of the amount of the raise, it may be more difficult to
do so if we sell substantially less than all of the Bonds. Such a
result may negatively impact our liquidity and increase our
dependence on higher interest debt to acquire target properties. In
that event, our investment costs will increase, which may decrease
our ability to make payments to Bondholders.
Our trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a
Forced Sale Agreement may be limited due to covenants contained in
the senior and mezzanine debt securing such property.
In
order to comply with the Equity-Bond Ratio, we may enter into
Forced Sale Agreements with affiliates whereby an equity interests
of a property may be sold if our company does not comply with
certain covenants in the Indenture. In such a circumstance, we
expect that any such property will be financed with debt, the terms
of each which will likely provide that the borrower will be in
default if the property is transferred, pledged or otherwise
encumbered without lender consent. Terms will also likely provide
that the borrower will be in default if the ownership interest in
the property or the ownership interest of any entity directly or
indirectly owning the property changes without lender consent. As a
result, it may not be possible or it may be prohibitively expensive
to sell the equity interests subject to a Forced Sale Agreement
without lender consent.
Neither any future Forced Sale Agreements nor any
current or future Cash Flow Loan Agreements limit the rights
of the Cash Flow Lenders to sell their indirect equity in Lakeview
Square, Ridgmar, or any equity subject to a future Forced Sale
Agreement or Cash Flow Loan to an unaffiliated third party,
nor do they preclude the sale of the underlying real
properties.
Any
future Forced Sale Agreements and any current or
future Cash Flow Loan Agreements will not limit the
rights of the holders of such equity to sell their
equity, nor do those agreements preclude a sale of the underlying
real properties. In either circumstance, we would lose our rights
to Cash Flow Loans relative to the interest sold, and the value of
the interest sold would no longer be available to support the
Equity-Bond Ratio or the repayment of the Bonds in the event the
trustee exercised its rights under the Forced Sale
Agreements.
Our trustee shall be under no obligation to exercise any of the
rights or powers vested in it by the Indenture at the request,
order or direction of any of the Bondholders, pursuant to the
provisions of the Indenture, unless such Bondholders shall have
offered to the trustee reasonable security or indemnity against the
costs, expenses and liabilities that may be incurred therein or
thereby.
The
Indenture provides that in case an Event of Default (as herein
defined) in the Indenture shall occur and not be cured, the trustee
will be required, in the exercise of its power, to use the degree
of care of a reasonable person in the conduct of his own affairs.
Subject to such provisions, the trustee will be under no obligation
to exercise any of its rights or powers under the Indenture at the
request of any Bondholder, unless the Bondholder has offered to the
trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to it against any loss,
liability or expense.
Investment Risks
The Bonds will have limited transferability and
liquidity.
There
is no active market for the Bonds. Although we may apply for
quotation of the Bonds on an alternative trading system or over the
counter market, even if we obtain that quotation, we do not know
the extent to which investor interest will lead to the development
and maintenance of a liquid trading market. Further, the Bonds will
not be quoted on an alternative trading system or over the
counter market until after the termination of this offering,
if at all. Therefore, investors will be required to wait until at
least after the final termination date of this offering for such
quotation. The initial public offering price for the Bonds has been
determined by us. You may not be able to sell the Bonds you
purchase at or above the initial offering price.
Alternative trading
systems and over the counter markets, as with other public
markets, may from time to time experience significant price
and volume fluctuations. As a result, the market price of the Bonds
may be similarly volatile, and Bondholders may from time to time
experience a decrease in the value of their Bonds, including
decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. The
price of the Bonds could be subject to wide fluctuations in
response to a number of factors, including those listed in this
“Risk
Factors” section of this Offering
Circular.
No
assurance can be given that the market price of the Bonds will not
fluctuate or decline significantly in the future or that
Bondholders will be able to sell their Bonds when desired on
favorable terms, or at all. Further, the sale of the Bonds may have
adverse federal income tax consequences.
Our limited prior operating history makes it difficult for you to
evaluate this investment.
We have
limited prior operating history and may not be able to successfully
operate our business or achieve our investment objectives. We may
not be able to conduct our business as described in our plan of
operation.
You will not have the opportunity to evaluate our investments
before we make them and we may make real estate investments that
would have changed your decision as to whether to invest in our
Bonds.
As of
the date of this offering circular, we own two properties, Lake
Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio. We are not able to provide you with
information to evaluate our additional investments prior to
acquisition. We will seek to invest substantially all of the
offering proceeds available for investment, after the payment of
fees and expenses, in the acquisition of real estate and real
estate related investments. We have established criteria for
evaluating potential investments. See “Investment Policies of
Company” for more information. However, you will be
unable to evaluate the transaction terms, location, and financial
or operational data concerning the investments before we invest in
them. You will have no opportunity to evaluate the terms of
transactions or other economic or financial data concerning our
investments prior to our investment. You will be relying entirely
on the ability of GK Development and its management team to
identify suitable investments and propose transactions for GK
Development, our sole manager, to oversee and approve. These
factors increase the risk that we may not generate the returns that
you seek by investing in our Bonds.
The inability to retain or obtain key personnel, property managers
and leasing agents could delay or hinder implementation of our
investment strategies, which could impair our ability to honor our
obligations under the terms of Bonds and could reduce the value of
your investment.
Our
success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of
GK Development’s management team. We do not have employment
agreements with any of these individuals nor do we currently have
key man life insurance on any of these individuals. If any of them
were to cease their affiliation with us or GK Development, GK
Development may be unable to find suitable replacements, and our
operating results could suffer. We believe that our future success
depends, in large part, upon GK Development’s property
managers’ and leasing agents’ ability to hire and
retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing
personnel. Competition for highly skilled personnel is intense, and
GK Development and any property managers we retain may be
unsuccessful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. If
we lose or are unable to obtain the services of highly skilled
personnel, property managers or leasing agents, our ability to
implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered,
and our ability to pay our Bond Service Obligations and repay
principal may be materially and adversely affected.
We rely on JCC Advisors, LLC to sell our Bonds pursuant to this
offering. If JCC Advisors, LLC is not able to market our Bonds
effectively, we may be unable to raise sufficient proceeds to meet
our business objectives.
We have
engaged JCC Advisors, LLC to act as our Managing Broker-Dealer for
this offering, and we rely on JCC Advisors, LLC to use its best
efforts to sell the Bonds offered hereby. It would also be
challenging and disruptive to locate an alternative Managing
Broker-Dealer for this offering. Without improved capital raising,
our portfolio will be smaller relative to our general and
administrative costs and less diversified than it otherwise would
be, which could adversely affect the value of your investment in
us.
There are limited covenants to the Indenture.
The
Indenture does not directly prevent our company from incurring
unsecured indebtedness that is equal or subordinate in right of
payment to the Bonds. For that reason, you should not consider the
covenants in the Indenture as a significant factor in evaluating
whether to invest in the Bonds.
An
increase in the level of our outstanding indebtedness, or other
events, could have an adverse impact on our business, properties,
capital structure, financial condition, results of operations or
prospects, which could adversely impact the Bonds. Any such event
could also adversely affect our cost of borrowing, limit our access
to the capital markets or result in more restrictive covenants in
future debt arrangements.
Under certain circumstances, we may redeem the Bonds before
maturity, and you may be unable to reinvest the proceeds at the
same or a higher rate of return.
We may
redeem all or a portion of the Bonds at any time. See
“Description of
Company’s Securities - Optional Redemption” for
more information. While we are required to pay certain prepayment
premiums on or prior to September 30, 2021, if redemption occurs,
you may be unable to reinvest the money you receive in the
redemption at a rate that is equal to or higher than the rate of
return on the Bonds.
Risks Related to This Offering and Our Corporate
Structure
Because we are dependent upon GK Development and its affiliates to
conduct our operations, any adverse changes in the financial health
of GK Development or its affiliates or our relationship with them
could hinder our operating performance and our ability to meet our
financial obligations.
We are
dependent on GK Development and its affiliates to manage our
operations and acquire and manage our portfolio of real estate
assets. Our sole manager, GK Development makes all decisions with
respect to the management of our company. GK Development depends
upon the fees and other compensation that it receives from us in
connection with the purchase, management and sale of our properties
to conduct its operations. Any adverse changes in the financial
condition of GK Development or our relationship with GK Development
could hinder its ability to successfully manage our operations and
our portfolio of investments.
You will have no control over changes in our policies and
day-to-day operations, which lack of control increases the
uncertainty and risks you face as an investor in our Bonds. In
addition, our sole manager and sponsor, GK Development, may change
our major operational policies without your approval.
Our
sole manager and sponsor, GK Development determines our major
policies, including our policies regarding financing, growth, debt
capitalization, and distributions. GK Development may amend or
revise these and other policies without your approval. As a
Bondholder, you will have no rights under the limited liability
company agreement of our company, or our Operating Agreement. See
“General
Information as to Our Company - Operating Agreement”
herein for a detailed summary of our Operating
Agreement.
GK
Development is responsible for the day-to-day operations of our
company and the selection and management of investments and has
broad discretion over the use of proceeds from this offering.
Accordingly, you should not purchase our Bonds unless you are
willing to entrust all aspects of the day-to-day management and the
selection and management of investments to GK Development.
Specifically, GK Development is controlled by Mr. Garo Kholamian as
sole stockholder and sole director, and as a result, he will be
able to exert significant control over our operations. Our
company has no board of managers and Mr. Kholamian has exclusive
control over the operations of GK Development, Inc. and our
company, as our manager. As a result, we are dependent on Mr.
Kholamian rather than a group of managers to properly choose
investments and manage our company. In addition, GK Development may
retain independent contractors to provide various services for our
company, and you should note that such contractors will have no
fiduciary duty to you or the other Bondholders and may not perform
as expected or desired.
Bondholders will have no right to remove our manager or otherwise
change our management, even if we are underperforming and not
attaining our investment objectives.
Only
the members of our company have the right to remove our manager,
and only if our manager has made a decision to file a voluntary
petition or otherwise initiate proceedings to have it adjudicated
insolvent, or to seek an order for relief as debtor under the
United States Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. §§ 101
et seq.); to file any
petition seeking any composition, reorganization, readjustment,
liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under the present or any
future federal bankruptcy laws or any other present or future
applicable federal, state or other statute or law relative to
bankruptcy, insolvency, or other relief for debtors; to seek the
appointment of any trustee, receiver, conservator, assignee,
sequestrator, custodian, liquidator (or other similar official) of
our company or of all or any substantial part of the assets of our
company, to make any general assignment for the benefit of
creditors of our company, to admit in writing the inability of our
company to pay its debts generally as they become due, or to
declare or effect a moratorium on our company’s debt or to
take any action in furtherance of any of the above proscribed
actions. Bondholders will have no rights in the management of our
company. As an investor in this offering, you will have no ability
to remove our manager.
Our manager and its executive officers will have limited
liability for, and will be indemnified and held harmless from, the
losses of our company.
GK
Development, our manager and its executive officers and their
agents and assigns, will not be liable for, and will be indemnified
and held harmless (to the extent of our company’s assets)
from any loss or damage incurred by them, our company or the
members in connection with the business of our company resulting
from any act or omission performed or omitted in good faith, which
does not constitute fraud, willful misconduct, gross negligence or
breach of fiduciary duty. A successful claim for such
indemnification could deplete our company’s assets by the
amount paid. See
“General
Information as to Our Company - Operating Agreement -
Indemnification” below for a detailed summary of the
terms of our Operating Agreement. Our Operating Agreement is filed
as an exhibit to the Offering Statement of which this Offering
Circular is a part.
If we sell substantially less than all of the Bonds we are
offering, the costs we incur to comply with the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, regarding financial
reporting and other fixed costs will be a larger percentage of our
net income and may reduce the return on your
investment.
We
expect to incur significant costs in maintaining compliance with
the financial reporting for a Tier II Regulation A issuer and that
our management will spend a significant amount of time assessing
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
We do not anticipate that these costs or the amount of time our
management will be required to spend will be significantly less if
we sell substantially less than all of the Bonds we are
offering.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
Our sole manager, its executive officers and their affiliates face
conflicts of interest relating to the purchase and leasing of
properties, and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor,
which could limit our investment opportunities, impair our ability
to make distributions and reduce the value of your
investment.
We rely
on GK Development to identify suitable investment opportunities. We
may be buying properties at the same time as other entities that
are affiliated with or sponsored by GK Development. Other programs
sponsored by GK Development or its affiliates also rely on GK
Development, its executive officers and their affiliates for
investment opportunities. GK Development has sponsored privately
offered real estate programs and may in the future sponsor
privately and publicly offered real estate programs that have
investment objectives similar to ours. Therefore, GK Development
and its affiliates could be subject to conflicts of interest
between our company and other real estate programs. Many investment
opportunities would be suitable for us as well as other programs.
GK Development could direct attractive investment opportunities or
tenants to other entities. Such events could result in our
investing in properties that provide less attractive returns or
getting less attractive tenants, impairing our ability to honor our
obligations under the terms of the Bonds and the value of your
investment. See “Selection, Retention and
Custody of Company’s Investments” and
“Policies
with Respect to Certain Transactions” for more
information.
Payment of fees to GK Development and its affiliates will reduce
cash available for investment and payment of our Bond Service
Obligations.
GK Development and its affiliates perform services
for us in connection with the selection and acquisition of our
properties and other investments, and possibly the development,
management and leasing of our properties. They are paid fees for
these services, which reduces the amount of cash available for
investment and for payment of our Bond Service Obligations.
Although customary in the industry, the fees to be paid to GK
Development and its affiliates were not determined on an
arm’s-length basis. We cannot assure you that a third party
unaffiliated with GK Development would not be willing to provide
such services to us at a lower price. If the maximum offering
amount is raised, without the application of any Discount we
estimate that 2.55% of the gross proceeds of this offering will be
paid to GK Development, its affiliates and third parties for
upfront fees and expenses associated with the offer and sale of the
Bonds. The expenses we actually incur in connection with the offer
and sale of the Bonds, excluding acquisition and origination fees
and expenses, may exceed the amount we expect to incur. In addition
to this, GK Development will receive a 2% acquisition fee based on
the purchase price of assets acquired from nonaffiliated, third
party sellers, a 2% financing fee based on the amount of debt
raised to acquire new assets or refinance existing assets,
exclusive of any lender fees, and a 2% disposition fee based on the
sales price of assets sold, exclusive of any brokerage fees. See
“Selection,
Retention and Custody of Company’s
Investments” and
“Policies
with Respect to Certain Transactions” for more information.
GK Development will receive certain fees regardless of the
performance of our company or an investment in the
Bonds.
GK
Development will receive a promoter’s fee equal to 1.88% of
the gross offering proceeds, an acquisition fee equal to 2% of the
purchase price of each acquired asset from non-affiliated, third
party sellers, and a financing fee equal to 2% of the amount of
debt raised to acquire new assets or refinance existing assets of
our company. These fees will be paid regardless of our
company’s success and the performance of the
Bonds.
GK Development, as our manager, may increase the fees payable to it
and/or its affiliates with the consent of a majority of the
Bonds.
GK
Development will have the power to contractually bind our company
as its manager. As a result, GK Development may agree to increase
the fees payable to it and/or its affiliates with the consent of a
majority of the Bonds. For this purpose, a Bondholder will be
deemed to have consented with respect to its Bonds if the
Bondholder has not objected in writing within five (5) calendar
days after the receipt of the consent request. As a result, GK
Development may increase fees paid to it or its affiliates without
the affirmative consent of the Bondholders.
GK Development and its affiliates, including our officers, face
conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us
and other programs sponsored by affiliates of GK Development, which
could result in actions that are not in the long-term, best
interests of our Bondholders.
GK
Development and its affiliates receive fees from us. These fees
could influence GK Development’s advice to us, as well as the
judgment of the affiliates of GK Development who serve as our
officers. Among other matters, the compensation arrangements could
affect their judgment with respect to property acquisitions from,
or the making of investments in, other programs sponsored by GK
Development, which might entitle affiliates of GK Development to
disposition fees and other possible fees in connection with its
services for the seller. See “Selection, Retention and
Custody of Company’s Investments” and
“Policies
with Respect to Certain Transactions” for more
information.
Considerations
relating to their compensation from other programs could result in
decisions that are not in the best interests of our Bondholders,
which could hurt our ability to perform our obligations due under
the Bonds or result in a decline in the value of your
investment.
If the competing demands for the time of GK Development, its
affiliates and our officers result in them spending insufficient
time on our business, we may miss investment opportunities or have
less efficient operations, which could reduce our profitability and
impair our ability to honor our obligations under the
Bonds.
We do
not have any employees. We rely on the employees of GK Development
and its affiliates for the day to day operation of our business.
The amount of time that GK Development and its affiliates spend on
our business will vary from time to time and is expected to be
greater while we are raising money and acquiring properties. GK
Development and its affiliates, including our officers, have
interests in other programs and engage in other business
activities. As a result, they will have conflicts of interest in
allocating their time between us and other programs and activities
in which they are involved. Because these persons have competing
interests on their time and resources, they may have conflicts of
interest in allocating their time between our business and these
other activities. During times of intense activity in other
programs and ventures, they may devote less time and fewer
resources to our business than are necessary or appropriate to
manage our business. We expect that as our real estate activities
expand, GK Development will attempt to hire additional employees
who would devote substantially all of their time to our business.
There is no assurance that GK Development will devote adequate time
to our business. If GK Development suffers or is distracted by
adverse financial or operational problems in connection with its
operations unrelated to us, it may allocate less time and resources
to our operations. If any of these things occur, our ability to
honor obligations under the Bonds may be adversely
affected.
Our subsidiaries have mezzanine debt held by an affiliate of our
manager, and there is nothing restricting us from procuring future
debt financing from affiliates of our manager.
In
order to finance Lake Mead Crossing, we received financing in the
form of mezzanine debt from an affiliate of our manager, GK Secured
Income IV, LLC, with a current outstanding principal balance of
approximately $6,417,483 and interest rate of 8% per annum. We may
use offering proceeds to repay this debt. There is nothing
restricting us from receiving future debt financing from affiliates
of our manager to make future investments. We believe the terms of
the current loan are, and any future loans from an affiliate of our
manager will be, fair and at market rates for such loans. However,
we cannot assure you that a third party unaffiliated with GK
Development would not be willing to provide current loan financing
on better terms.
Risks Related to Investments in Commercial Rental Real
Estate
Our operating results may be affected by economic conditions that
have an adverse impact on the commercial real estate market in
general, and may cause us to be unable to realize appreciation in
the value of our commercial real estate properties.
Our
operating results are subject to risks generally associated with
the ownership of commercial real estate, including, but not limited
to changes in general economic conditions, changes in interest
rates and the availability of mortgage funds that may make the sale
a of commercial real estate difficult. Although we intend to hold
our commercial real estate and related investments until such a
time as our sole manager, GK Development, determines that a sale or
other disposition appears to be advantageous to our overall
investment objectives; we cannot predict the various market
conditions affecting commercial real estate investments that will
exist at any particular time in the future. Because of this
uncertainty, we cannot assure you that we will realize any
appreciation in the value of our commercial real estate
properties.
Competition from other commercial rental properties for tenants
could reduce our profitability and impair our ability to honor our
obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
The
commercial rental property industry is highly competitive. This
competition could reduce occupancy levels and revenues at our
commercial rental properties, which would adversely affect our
operations. We face competition from many sources. We face
competition from other commercial rental properties both in the
immediate vicinity and in the larger geographic market where our
commercial rental properties will be located. Overbuilding of
commercial rental properties may occur. If so, this will increase
the number of units available and may decrease occupancy and rental
rates. In addition, increases in operating costs due to inflation
may not be offset by increased rental rates.
Increased construction of similar properties that compete with our
commercial rental properties in any particular location could
adversely affect the operating results of our commercial rental
properties and our cash available to honor our obligations under
the terms of the Bonds.
We may
acquire commercial rental properties in locations which experience
increases in construction of properties that compete with our
properties. This increased competition and construction
could:
●
make it
more difficult for us to find tenants to lease units in our
commercial rental properties;
●
force
us to lower our rental prices in order to lease units in our
commercial properties; and/or
●
substantially
reduce our revenues and cash available to honor our obligations
under the terms of the Bonds.
We compete with numerous other parties or entities for commercial
real estate assets and tenants and may not compete
successfully.
We
compete with numerous other persons or entities engaged in
commercial real estate investment activities, many of which have
greater resources than we do. Some of these investors may enjoy
significant competitive advantages that result from, among other
things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating
efficiencies. Our competitors may be willing to offer space at
rates below our rates, causing us to lose existing or potential
tenants.
Many of our investments will be dependent on tenants for revenue,
and lease terminations could reduce our revenues from rents,
resulting in the decline in the value of your
investment.
The
underlying value of our commercial properties and the ability to
honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds depend upon the
ability of the tenants of our commercial properties to generate
enough income to pay their rents in a timely manner, and the
success of our investments depends upon the occupancy levels,
rental income and operating expenses of our commercial properties
and our company. Tenants’ inability to timely pay their rents
may be impacted by employment and other constraints on their
personal finances, including debts, purchases and other factors.
These and other changes beyond our control may adversely affect our
tenants’ ability to make lease payments. In the event of a
tenant default or bankruptcy, we may experience delays in enforcing
our rights as landlord and may incur costs in protecting our
investment and re-leasing the premises. We may be unable to
re-lease the premises for the rent previously received. We may be
unable to sell a commercial property with low occupancy without
incurring a loss. These events and others could impair our ability
to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds and may also
cause the value of your investment to decline.
Our operating results and distributable cash flow depend on our
ability to generate revenue from leasing our commercial properties
to tenants on terms favorable to us.
Our
operating results depend, in large part, on revenues derived from
leasing space in our commercial properties. We are subject to the
credit risk of our tenants, and to the extent our tenants default
on their leases or fail to make rental payments we may suffer a
decrease in our revenue. In addition, if a tenant does not pay its
rent, we may not be able to enforce our rights as landlord without
delays and we may incur substantial legal costs. We are also
subject to the risk that we will not be able to lease space in our
commercial properties or that, upon the expiration of leases for
space located in our commercial properties, leases may not be
renewed, the space may not be re-leased or the terms of renewal or
re-leasing (including the cost of required renovations or
concessions to customers) may be less favorable to us than current
lease terms. If vacancies continue for a long period of time, we
may suffer reduced revenues which would impair our ability to honor
our obligations under the terms of the Bonds. In addition, the
resale value of the commercial property could be diminished because
the market value of a particular property will depend principally
upon the value of the leases of such property. Further, costs
associated with commercial real estate investment, such as real
estate taxes and maintenance costs, generally are not reduced when
circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment.
These events would cause a significant decrease in revenues and
could impair our ability to honor our obligations under the terms
of the Bonds.
Costs incurred in complying with governmental laws and regulations
may reduce our net income and the cash available for
distributions.
Our
company and the commercial properties we own and expect to own are
subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations
relating to environmental protection and human health and safety.
Federal laws such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended by the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, the Federal Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act,
the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act and the
Hazard Communication Act and their resolutions and corresponding
state and local counterparts govern such matters as wastewater
discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground
and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment,
transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials and
the remediation of contamination associated with disposals. The
commercial properties we acquire will be subject to the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990 which generally requires that certain
types of buildings and services be made accessible and available to
people with disabilities. These laws may require us to make
modifications to our properties. Some of these laws and regulations
impose joint and several liability on tenants, owners or operators
for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties,
regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination
were illegal. Compliance with these laws and any new or more
stringent laws or regulations may require us to incur material
expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose
material environmental liability. In addition, there are various
federal, state and local fire, health, life-safety and similar
regulations with which we may be required to comply, and which may
subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for
noncompliance.
Our
commercial properties may be affected by our tenants’
activities or actions, the existing condition of land when we buy
it, operations in the vicinity of our commercial properties, such
as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of
unrelated third parties. The presence of hazardous substances, or
the failure to properly remediate these substances, may make it
difficult or impossible to sell or rent such property. Any material
expenditures, fines, or damages we must pay will impair our ability
to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds and may
reduce the value of your investment.
Any uninsured losses or high insurance premiums will reduce our net
income and the amount of our cash available to honor our
obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
Our
company will attempt to obtain adequate insurance to cover
significant areas of risk to us, as a company, and to our
commercial properties. However, there are types of losses at the
property level, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses
due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes,
pollution or environmental matters, which are uninsurable or not
economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations,
such as large deductibles or co-payments. We may not have adequate
coverage for such losses. If any of our commercial properties incur
a casualty loss that is not fully insured, the value of our assets
will be reduced by any such uninsured loss. In addition, other than
any working capital reserve or other reserves we may establish, we
have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured
damaged property. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly
large amounts for insurance, we could suffer reduced earnings that
would impair our ability to honor our obligations under the terms
of the Bonds.
As part of otherwise attractive properties, we may acquire some
properties with existing lock out provisions, which may inhibit us
from selling a commercial property, or may require us to maintain
specified debt levels for a period of years on some
properties.
Loan
provisions could materially restrict us from selling or otherwise
disposing of or refinancing commercial properties. These provisions
would affect our ability to turn our investments into cash and thus
affect cash available to honor our obligations under the terms of
the Bonds, including if the trustee exercised its remedy to force
the sale of the commercial properties we acquire. Loan provisions
may prohibit us from reducing the outstanding indebtedness with
respect to commercial properties, refinancing such indebtedness on
a non-recourse basis at maturity, or increasing the amount of
indebtedness with respect to such properties.
Loan
provisions could impair our ability to take actions that would
otherwise be in the best interests of the Bondholders and,
therefore, may have an adverse impact on the value of your
investment, relative to the value that would result if the loan
provisions did not exist. In particular, loan provisions could
preclude us from participating in major transactions that could
result in a disposition of our assets or a change in control even
though that disposition or change in control might be in the best
interests of our Bondholders.
If we elect to improve any vacant portions of, or redevelop,
our acquired properties, such actions will expose us
to additional risks beyond those associated with owning and
operating commercial rental properties and could materially and
adversely affect us.
We may
redevelop one or more of our acquired properties or
improve vacant portions of our acquired properties, including the
vacant pad sites at Lake Mead Crossing. If we elect to do so, we
will be subject to additional risks and our business may be
adversely affect by:
●
abandonment
of redevelopment or improvement opportunities after expending
significant cash and other resources to determine feasibility,
requiring us to expense costs incurred in connection with the
abandoned project;
●
construction
costs of a project exceeding our original estimates;
●
failure
to complete a project on schedule or in conformity with building
plans and specifications;
●
the
lack of available construction financing on favorable terms or at
all;
●
the
lack of available permanent financing upon completion of a project
initially financed through construction loans on favorable terms or
at all;
●
failure
to obtain, or delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land use,
building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and
authorizations;
●
liability
for injuries and accidents occurring during the construction
process and for environmental liabilities, including those that may
result from off-site disposal of construction
materials;
●
our
inability to comply with any build-to-suit tenant’s
procurement standards and processes in place from time to time;
and
●
circumstances
beyond our control, including: work stoppages, labor disputes,
shortages of qualified trades people, such as carpenters, roofers,
electricians and plumbers, changes in laws relating to union
organizing activity, lack of adequate utility infrastructure and
services, our reliance on local subcontractors, who may not be
adequately capitalized or insured, and shortages, delay in
availability, or fluctuations in prices of, building
materials.
Any of
these circumstances could give rise to delays in the start or
completion of, or could increase the cost of, redeveloping or
improving one or more of our acquired properties. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to recover any increased costs by raising
our lease rates. Additionally, due to the amount of time required
for planning, constructing and leasing of redevelopment projects,
we may not realize a significant cash return for several years.
Furthermore, any of these circumstances could hinder our growth and
materially and adversely affect us. In addition, new redevelopment
or improvement activities, regardless of whether or not they are
ultimately successful, typically require substantial time and
attention from management.
General Risks Related to Real Estate-Related
Investments
If we make or invest in mortgage loans as part of our plan to
acquire the underlying property, our mortgage loans may be affected
by unfavorable real estate market conditions, including interest
rate fluctuations, which could decrease the value of those loans
and the return on your investment.
If we
make or invest in mortgage loans, we will be at risk of defaults by
the borrowers on those mortgage loans as well as interest rate
risks. To the extent we incur delays in liquidating such defaulted
mortgage loans; we may not be able to obtain sufficient proceeds to
repay all amounts due to us under the mortgage loan. Further, we
will not know whether the values of the properties securing the
mortgage loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of
origination of those mortgage loans. If the values of the
underlying properties fall, our risk will increase because of the
lower value of the security associated with such
loans.
Investments in real estate-related securities will be subject to
specific risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities
and may be subject to the general risks of investing in
subordinated real estate securities, which may result in losses to
us.
We may
invest in real estate related securities of both publicly traded
and private real estate companies. Issuers of real estate related
equity securities generally invest in real estate or real estate
related assets and are subject to the inherent risks associated
with real estate related investments discussed in this Offering
Circular, including risks relating to rising interest
rates.
Real
estate-related securities are often unsecured and also may be
subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. As a result,
investments in real estate-related securities are subject to risks
of: (1) limited liquidity in the secondary trading market in
the case of unlisted or thinly traded securities;
(2) subordination to the prior claims of banks and other
senior lenders to the issuer; (3) the operation of mandatory
sinking fund or call/redemption provisions during periods of
declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to reinvest
redemption proceeds in lower yielding assets; (4) the
possibility that earnings of the issuer may be insufficient to meet
its debt service and distribution obligations and (5) the
declining creditworthiness and potential for insolvency of the
issuer during periods of rising interest rates and economic
slowdown or downturn. These risks may adversely affect the value of
outstanding real estate-related securities and the ability of the
issuers thereof to repay principal and interest or make
distribution payments.
Investments in real estate-related securities may be illiquid, and
we may not be able to adjust our portfolio in response to changes
in economic and other conditions.
If we
invest in certain real estate-related securities that we may
purchase in connection with privately negotiated transactions, they
will not be registered under the relevant securities laws,
resulting in a prohibition against their transfer, sale, pledge or
other disposition except in a transaction that is exempt from the
registration requirements of, or is otherwise in accordance with,
those laws. As a result, our ability to vary our long-term
stabilized portfolio in response to changes in economic and other
conditions may be relatively limited. The subordinated and bridge
loans we may purchase will be particularly illiquid investments due
to their short life. Moreover, in the event of a borrower’s
default on an illiquid real estate security, the unsuitability for
securitization and potential lack of recovery of our investment
could pose serious risks of loss to our investment
portfolio.
Delays in restructuring or liquidating non-performing real
estate-related securities could reduce our ability to honor our
obligations under the Bonds.
If we
invest in real estate-related securities, they may become
non-performing after acquisition for a wide variety of reasons.
Such non-performing real estate investments may require a
substantial amount of workout negotiations and/or restructuring,
which may entail, among other things, a substantial reduction in
the interest rate and a substantial write down of such loan or
asset. However, even if a restructuring is successfully
accomplished, upon maturity of such real estate security,
replacement “takeout” financing may not be available.
We may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on some of the
collateral securing one or more of our investments. Intercreditor
provisions may substantially interfere with our ability to do so.
Even if foreclosure is an option, the foreclosure process can be
lengthy and expensive. Borrowers often resist foreclosure actions
by asserting numerous claims, counterclaims and defenses,
including, without limitation, lender liability claims and
defenses, in an effort to prolong the foreclosure action. In some
states, foreclosure actions can take up to several years or more to
litigate. At any time during the foreclosure proceedings, the
borrower may file for bankruptcy, which would have the effect of
staying the foreclosure action and further delaying the foreclosure
process. Foreclosure litigation tends to create a negative public
image of the collateral property and may result in disrupting
ongoing leasing and management of the property. Foreclosure actions
by senior lenders may substantially affect the amount that we may
receive from an investment.
Your investment return may be reduced if we are required to
register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act;
if we are subject to registration under the Investment Company Act,
we will not be able to continue our business.
Neither
we, nor any of our subsidiaries intend to register as an investment
company under the Investment Company Act. We expect that our
subsidiaries’ investments in real estate will represent the
substantial majority of our total asset mix, which would not
subject us to the Investment Company Act. In order to maintain an
exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act, we
intend to engage, through our wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries, primarily in the business of buying real estate, and
these investments must be made within a year after this offering
ends. If we are unable to invest a significant portion of the
proceeds of this offering in properties within one year of the
termination of this offering, we may avoid being required to
register as an investment company by temporarily investing any
unused proceeds in government securities with low returns, which
would reduce the cash available for fulfilling our obligations
under the Bonds.
We
expect that most of our assets will be held through wholly-owned or
majority-owned subsidiaries of our company. We expect that most of
these subsidiaries will be outside the definition of investment
company under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act as
they are generally expected to hold at least 60% of their assets in
real property or in entities that they manage or co-manage that own
real property. Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company
Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is or holds
itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing,
reinvesting or trading in securities. Section 3(a)(1)(C) of
the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any
issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of
investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities
and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a
value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets
(exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an
unconsolidated basis, which we refer to as the 40% test. Excluded
from the term “investment securities,” among other
things, are U.S. government securities and securities issued by
majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment
companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition
of investment company set forth in Section 3(c)(1) or
Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. We believe that
we, and our subsidiaries, will not fall within either
definition of investment company as we intend to invest primarily
in real property, through our wholly-owned or majority-owned
subsidiaries, the majority of which we expect to have at least 60%
of their assets in real property or in entities that they manage or
co-manage that own real property. As these subsidiaries would be
investing either solely or primarily in real property, they would
be outside of the definition of “investment company”
under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act. We are
organized as a holding company that conducts its businesses
primarily through its subsidiaries. Both we and our operating
partnership intend to conduct our operations so that they comply
with the 40% test. We will monitor our holdings to ensure
continuing and ongoing compliance with this test. In addition, we
believe that neither we nor our subsidiaries will be considered an
investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act
because neither we nor the operating partnership will engage
primarily or hold itself out as being engaged primarily in the
business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities.
Rather, through wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries, we
will be primarily engaged in the non-investment company businesses
of these subsidiaries.
In the
event that the value of investment securities held by the
subsidiaries of our company were to exceed 40%, we expect our
subsidiaries to be able to rely on the exclusion from the
definition of “investment company” provided by
Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act.
Section 3(c)(5)(C), as interpreted by the staff of the SEC,
requires each of our subsidiaries relying on this exception to
invest at least 55% of its portfolio in “mortgage and other
liens on and interests in real estate,” which we refer to as
“qualifying real estate assets” and maintain at least
80% of its assets in qualifying real estate assets or other real
estate-related assets. The remaining 20% of the portfolio can
consist of miscellaneous assets. What we buy and sell is therefore
limited to these criteria. How we determine to classify our assets
for purposes of the Investment Company Act will be based in large
measure upon no action letters issued by the SEC staff in the past
and other SEC interpretive guidance. These no action positions were
issued in accordance with factual situations that may be
substantially different from the factual situations we may face,
and a number of these no-action positions were issued more than ten
years ago. Pursuant to this guidance, and depending on the
characteristics of the specific investments, certain mortgage
loans, participations in mortgage loans, mortgage-backed
securities, mezzanine loans, joint venture investments and the
equity securities of other entities may not constitute qualifying
real estate assets and therefore investments in these types of
assets may be limited. No assurance can be given that the SEC will
concur with our classification of our assets. Future revisions to
the Investment Company Act or further guidance from the SEC may
cause us to lose our exclusion from registration or force us to
re-evaluate our portfolio and our investment strategy. Such changes
may prevent us from operating our business
successfully.
In the
event that we, or our subsidiaries, were to acquire assets that
could make either our company or the respective subsidiary fall
within the definition of investment company under
Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, we believe that
we would still qualify for an exclusion from registration pursuant
to Section 3(c)(6). Section 3(c)(6) excludes from the
definition of investment company any company primarily engaged,
directly or through majority-owned subsidiaries, in one or more of
certain specified businesses. These specified businesses include
the business described in Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment
Company Act. It also excludes from the definition of investment
company any company primarily engaged, directly or through
majority-owned subsidiaries, in one or more of such specified
businesses from which at least 25% of such company’s gross
income during its last fiscal year is derived, together with any
additional business or businesses other than investing,
reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities. Although
the SEC staff has issued little interpretive guidance with respect
to Section 3(c)(6), we believe that we and subsidiaries may
rely on Section 3(c)(6) if 55% of the assets of our operating
partnership consist of, and at least 55% of the income of our
subsidiaries is derived from, qualifying real estate assets owned
by wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries of our operating
partnership.
To
ensure that neither we, nor our subsidiaries, are required to
register as an investment company, each entity may be unable to
sell assets they would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell
assets they would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we or our
subsidiaries may be required to acquire additional income or
loss-generating assets that we might not otherwise acquire or
forego opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we
would otherwise want to acquire. Although we and our subsidiaries
intend to monitor our portfolio periodically and prior to each
acquisition or disposition, any of these entities may not be able
to maintain an exclusion from registration as an investment
company. If we or our subsidiaries are required to register as an
investment company but fail to do so, the unregistered entity would
be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil
actions could be brought against such entity. In addition, the
contracts of such entity would be unenforceable unless a court
required enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take
control of the entity and liquidate its business.
Risks Associated with Debt Financing
We use debt financing to acquire properties and otherwise incur
other indebtedness, which increases our expenses and could subject
us to the risk of losing properties in foreclosure if our cash flow
is insufficient to make loan payments.
We are
permitted to acquire real properties and other real estate-related
investments including entity acquisitions by assuming either
existing financing secured by the asset or by borrowing new funds.
In addition, we may incur or increase our mortgage debt by
obtaining loans secured by some or all of our assets to obtain
funds to acquire additional investments or to pay our Bond Service
Obligations under our Bonds. If we mortgage a property and have
insufficient cash flow to service the debt, we risk an event of
default which may result in our lenders foreclosing on the
properties securing the mortgage.
High levels of debt or increases in interest rates could increase
the amount of our loan payments, which could reduce our ability to
honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
Our
policies do not limit us from incurring debt. High debt levels
could cause us to incur higher interest charges, result in higher
debt service payments, and may be accompanied by restrictive
covenants. Interest we pay reduces cash available to honor our
obligations under the terms of the Bonds. Additionally, with
respect to any variable rate debt, increases in interest rates may
increase our interest costs, which would reduce our cash flow and
our ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
In addition, if we need to repay debt during periods of rising
interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of
our investments in properties at times which may not permit
realization of the maximum return on such investments and could
result in a loss. In addition, if we are unable to service our debt
payments, our lenders may foreclose on our interests in the real
property that secures the loans we have entered.
High mortgage rates may make it difficult for us to finance or
refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties
we can acquire, our cash flow from operations and restrict our
ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the
Bonds.
Our
ability to acquire properties or to make capital improvements to or
remodel properties will depend on our ability to obtain debt or
equity financing from third parties or the sellers of properties.
If mortgage debt is unavailable at reasonable rates, we may not be
able to finance the purchase of properties. If we place mortgage
debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance
the properties when the debt becomes due or of being unable to
refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when we
refinance the properties, our income could be reduced. We may be
unable to refinance properties. If any of these events occur, our
cash flow would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduce cash
available to honor our obligations under the terms of the Bonds and
may hinder our ability to raise additional funds from capital
contributions, additional bonds or borrowing more
money.
We use mezzanine financing to acquire properties, which increases
our expenses and could reduce our ability to honor our obligations
under the terms of the Bonds.
Our
policies do not limit us from incurring mezzanine debt. Mezzanine
debt generally carries higher interest rates and could result in
higher debt service payments, and may be accompanied by restrictive
covenants. Interest we pay reduces cash available to honor our
obligations under the terms of the Bonds. In addition, if we are
unable to service our mezzanine debt payments, our mezzanine
lenders may foreclose on our ownership interests securing such
mezzanine loans. Some of our mezzanine financing may come from
affiliates. See “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions – Mezzanine
Debt.”
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating
to our operations, which could limit our ability to honor our
obligations under the terms of the Bonds.
When
providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that
affect our operating policies and our ability to incur additional
debt. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit
our ability to further mortgage the property, discontinue insurance
coverage, or replace our manager. These or other limitations may
limit our flexibility and prevent us from achieving our operating
goals. Prepayment penalties or defeasance requirements required by
lenders may make it economically infeasible for our trustee to
exercise the forced sale remedy regarding our acquired
properties.
Our ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms would be
impacted by negative capital market conditions.
Recently, domestic
and international financial markets have experienced unusual
volatility and uncertainty. Although this condition occurred
initially within the “subprime” single family mortgage
lending sector of the credit market, liquidity has tightened in
overall financial markets, including the investment grade debt and
equity capital markets. Consequently, there is greater uncertainty
regarding our ability to access the credit market in order to
attract financing on reasonable terms. Investment returns on our
assets and our ability to make acquisitions could be adversely
affected by our inability to secure financing on reasonable terms,
if at all.
Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default and
ultimately may reduce our ability to honor our obligations under
the terms of the Bonds.
We may
finance our property acquisitions using interest-only mortgage
indebtedness. During the interest-only period, the amount of each
scheduled payment will be less than that of a traditional
amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage
loan will not be reduced (except in the case of prepayments)
because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal during
this period. After the interest only period, we will be required
either to make scheduled payments of amortized principal and
interest or to make a lump sum or “balloon” payment at
maturity. These required principal or balloon payments will
increase the amount of our scheduled payments and may increase our
risk of default under the related mortgage loan. If the mortgage
loan has an adjustable interest rate, the amount of our scheduled
payments also may increase at a time of rising interest rates.
Increased payments and substantial principal or balloon maturity
payments will reduce the funds available to honor our obligations
under the Bonds because cash otherwise available for payment will
be required to pay principal and interest associated with these
mortgage loans.
To hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we may use derivative
financial instruments that may be costly and ineffective, may
reduce the overall financial benefit of your investment, and may
expose us to the credit risk of counterparties.
We may
use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to interest
rate fluctuations on loans secured by our assets and investments in
collateralized mortgage-backed securities. Derivative instruments
may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or
floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or
repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions will be
determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the
time of the hedge and may differ from time to time.
To the
extent that we use derivative financial instruments to hedge
against interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to
financing, basis risk and legal enforceability risks. In this
context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform
under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a
derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which
creates credit risk for us. We intend to manage credit risk by
dealing only with major financial institutions that have high
credit ratings. Basis risk occurs when the index upon which the
contract is based is more or less variable than the index upon
which the hedged asset or liability is based, thereby making the
hedge less effective. We intend to manage basis risk by matching,
to a reasonable extent, the contract index to the index upon which
the hedged asset or liability is based. Finally, legal
enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks, including
the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to
perform its obligations under, the derivative contract. We intend
to manage legal enforceability risks by ensuring, to the best of
our ability, that we contract with reputable counterparties and
that each counterparty complies with the terms and conditions of
the derivative contract. If we are unable to manage these risks
effectively, our results of operations, financial condition and
ability to honor our obligations under the terms of the
Bonds.
USE OF PROCEEDS
We
estimate that the net proceeds from this offering, after deducting
the underwriting compensation and offering costs and expenses
payable by us, will be approximately $44,650,000, assuming that the
maximum amount of Bonds are purchased and issued. We intend to use
the net proceeds from this offering to pay down existing
indebtedness and acquire properties in our target asset classes.
The remaining proceeds will be used to pay fees and expenses of
this offering, and fees and expenses related to selection and
acquisition of investments. If we do not sell the maximum number of
Bonds, our net proceeds from the offering will be reduced; however,
we will still use net proceeds from the offering to pay down
existing indebtedness and acquire properties in our target asset
class. A summary of the anticipated use of the proceeds is
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross offering
proceeds(1)
|
$50,000,000
|
100.00%
|
|
Less offering
expenses:
|
|
|
|
Selling commissions
and Managing Broker-Dealer Fee (2)
|
$4,000,000
|
8.00%
|
|
Due Diligence
Expense Reimbursements (3)
|
$60,000
|
0.12%
|
|
Organization and
offering expenses (4)
|
$275,000
|
0.55%
|
|
Less Promotional
Fee (5)
|
$940,000
|
1.88%
|
|
Less Blue-Sky
Filing Fees
|
$75,000
|
0.15%
|
|
Amount available
for investment
|
$44,650,000
|
89.30%
|
______________
|
(1)
|
This assumes we sell the remaining Bonds at the Price to the
Public. We may issue the remaining Bonds with a vonule-weighted
discount, or the Discount, of up to 5%. If we issue the remaining
Bonds with the maximum Discount, gross offering proceeds will be
$48,477,400 and the amount available for investment will be
$43,273,778.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
selling commissions equal to 5% of aggregate gross offering
proceeds and a Managing Broker-Dealer Fee of up to 3% of aggregate
gross offering proceeds, both of which are payable to the Managing
Broker-Dealer. Our Managing Broker-Dealer, in its sole discretion,
intends to reallow selling commissions of up to 5% of aggregate
gross offering proceeds to unaffiliated broker-dealers
participating in this offering attributable to the amount of Bonds
sold by them. Our Managing-Broker Dealer shall be entitled to
retain, out of the Managing Broker-Dealer Fee, an amount equal to
0.57% of the gross proceeds of the offering. JCC may re-allow and
pay to wholesalers and other participants in the offering up to the
entirety of the remaining 2.43% portion of the Managing
Broker-Dealer Fee. Any amount of the Managing Broker-Dealer Fee in
excess of the 0.57% JCC is entitled to retain that is not
re-allowed shall be returned to the Issuer. See “Plan of
Distribution” in this Offering Circular for a
description of such provisions.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
We have
agreed to pay up to $60,000 in due diligence expense reimbursements
to our Managing Broker-Dealer, which it may reallow
to participating broker dealers. To date, we have paid $23,458
in due diligence expense reimbursements to our Managing
Broker-Dealer.
|
|
(4)
|
Organization
and offering expenses include all expenses (other than those listed
in the chart) to be paid by us in connection with the offering,
including our legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees,
charge of our escrow holder, and amounts to reimburse our manager
for its portion of the salaries of the employees of its affiliates
who provide services to our manager and other costs in connection
with administrative oversight of the offering and marketing process
and preparing supplemental sales materials, holding educational
conferences and attending retail seminars conducted by
broker-dealers. As of the date of this Offering Circular,
organization and offering expenses total $107,514. Start-up and
organization costs will be expensed as incurred and syndication
costs will be reflected as a reduction of member’s equity and
will be allocated to the member’s capital accounts upon the
sale or liquidation of our company. Our manager will not be
reimbursed for the direct payment of such organization and offering
expenses that exceed 0.55% of the aggregate gross proceeds of this
offering over the life of the offering. We will not reimburse our
manager for any portion of the salaries and benefits to be paid to
its executive officers named in “Directors and Executive
Officers.”
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
We will
pay our manager, a 1.88% promotional fee for its services in
organizing and structuring this offering. The fee will be paid
following each closing of this offering. To date, we have paid our
manager $367,502 as a promotional fee.
|
|
(6)
|
Until
required in connection with the acquisition of properties,
substantially all of the net proceeds of the offering and,
thereafter, any working capital reserves we may have, may be
invested in short-term, highly-liquid investments, including
government obligations, bank certificates of deposit, short-term
debt obligations and interest-bearing accounts. Funds available for
investment may be used to acquire or invest in new properties, pay
down existing indebtedness (including debt held by affiliates) or
for certain development related costs consistent with our business
plan. See “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions – Mezzanine Debt” and
“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions –
Interim Debt” for more details regarding current
indebtedness that may be paid down using offering
proceeds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we
sell substantially less than the maximum offering amount and are
unable to acquire properties with the proceeds from this offering
and conventional mortgage debt, then we may use all of the proceeds
from this offering to pay down and manage our existing debt and
future debt used to acquire properties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
With
the proceeds of this offering we may pay down our existing
mezzanine debt associated with the acquisition of Lake Mead
Crossing. Lake Mead Parent, LLC, the owner of Lake Mead Partners,
LLC and Lake Mead Development, LLC received mezzanine debt to
purchase Lake Mead Crossing from an affiliate of our manager, GK
Secured Income IV, LLC, or GKSI IV. Lake Mead Parent and Lake Mead
Development are wholly-owned subsidiaries of our company. Under the
promissory note, Lake Mead Parent, LLC and Lake Mead Development,
LLC can borrow up to $10,500,000 at 8% interest. The mezzanine loan
requires monthly interest payments only. The loan matures on
November 12, 2018. Currently, the mezzanine loan has an outstanding
principal of approximately $6,417,483. GKSI IV was funded by
independent, third party investors. Pursuant to the terms of their
investments and the promissory note for the mezzanine loan, if the
mezzanine loan is prepaid, which results in GKSI IV being obligated
to pay a yield maintenance fee to the members of GKSI IV, Lake Mead
Partners, LLC and Lake Mead Development, LLC will be obligated to
pay to GKSI IV an amount equal to such yield maintenance fee. If
the yield maintenance fee becomes payable (a) during the first year
that a member holds a unit in GKSI IV, the yield maintenance fee
will be an amount equal to 12% per annum on the repayment amounts
for the remainder of such year after the repayment date; (b) during
the second year that a member holds a unit, the yield maintenance
fee will be an amount equal to 13% per annum on the repayment
amounts for the remainder of such year after the repayment date; or
(c) during the third year that the member holds a unit, the yield
maintenance fee will be an amount equal to 12-14% per annum on the
repayment amounts for the remainder of such year after the
repayment date. If loan is repaid within the thrid year (ending
November 12, 2018), LM Partners and LM Development would be
obligated to pay a prepaymoney penalty of approximately $3,341,380.
This amount has been measured as of June 30, 2018 using a 128 per
annum rate for the first year, 13% per annum rate for the second
year and a 14% per annum rate for the thrid
year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
With
the proceeds of this offering, we may pay down our existing interim
debt associated with the acquisitions of Lake Mead Crossing and
2700 Ygnacio. Lake Mead Partners, LLC received an interim loan from
our manager in the amount of $2,608,100 in connection with our
acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing. This loan has been fully
repaid.
2700
Ygnacio Partners, LLC received an interim loan from our manager in
the amount of $2,305,000 in connection with our acquisition of 2700
Ygnacio. This loan has been repaid.
|
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Who May Invest
As a
Tier II, Regulation A offering, investors must comply with the 10%
limitation to investment in the offering, as prescribed in Rule
251. The only investor in this offering exempt from this limitation
is an accredited investor, an “Accredited Investor,” as
defined under Rule 501 of Regulation D. If you meet one of the
following tests you qualify as an Accredited Investor:
|
|
(i)
|
You are
a natural person who has had individual income in excess of
$200,000 in each of the two most recent years, or joint income with
your spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of these years, and have
a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the
current year;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
You are
a natural person and your individual net worth, or joint net worth
with your spouse, exceeds $1,000,000 at the time you
purchase the Bonds (please see below on how to calculate your
net worth);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
You are
an executive officer or general partner of the issuer or a manager
or executive officer of the general partner of the
issuer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iv)
|
You are
an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the Code, a corporation, a
Massachusetts or similar business trust or a partnership, not
formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the Bonds, with total
assets in excess of $5,000,000;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
You are
a bank or a savings and loan association or other institution as
defined in the Securities Act, a broker or dealer registered
pursuant to Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the Exchange Act, an insurance company as defined by the
Securities Act, an investment company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the Investment Company
Act, or a business development company as defined in that act, any
Small Business Investment Company licensed by the Small Business
Investment Act of 1958 or a private business development company as
defined in the Investment Advisers Act of 1940;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(vi)
|
You are
an entity (including an Individual Retirement Account trust) in
which each equity owner is an accredited investor;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(vii)
|
You are
a trust with total assets in excess of $5,000,000, your purchase of
the Bonds is directed by a person who either alone or with his
purchaser representative(s) (as defined in Regulation D promulgated
under the Securities Act) has such knowledge and experience in
financial and business matters that he is capable of evaluating the
merits and risks of the prospective investment, and you were not
formed for the specific purpose of investing in the Bonds;
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(viii)
|
You are
a plan established and maintained by a state, its political
subdivisions, or any agency or instrumentality of a state or its
political subdivisions, for the benefit of its employees, if such
plan has assets in excess of $5,000,000.
|
Under
Rule 251 of Regulation A, non-accredited, non-natural investors
are subject to the investment limitation and may only invest funds
which do not exceed 10% of the greater of the purchaser’s
revenue or net assets (as of the purchaser’s most recent
fiscal year end). A non-accredited,
natural person may only invest funds which do not exceed 10%
of the greater of the purchaser’s annual income or net worth
(please see below on how to calculate your net worth).
NOTE: For the purposes of calculating your net worth, Net
Worth is defined as the difference between total assets and total
liabilities. This calculation must exclude the value of your
primary residence and may exclude any indebtedness secured by your
primary residence (up to an amount equal to the value of your
primary residence). In the case of fiduciary accounts, net worth
and/or income suitability requirements may be satisfied by the
beneficiary of the account or by the fiduciary, if the donor or
grantor is the fiduciary and fiduciary directly or indirectly
provides funds for the purchase of the Bonds.
Determination of Suitability
The
Selling Group Members and registered investment advisors
recommending the purchase of Bonds in this offering have the
responsibility to make every reasonable effort to determine that
your purchase of Bonds in this offering is a suitable and
appropriate investment for you based on information provided by you
regarding your financial situation and investment objectives. In
making this determination, these persons have the responsibility to
ascertain that you:
●
meet
the minimum income and net worth standards set forth under
“Plan of Distribution – Who May Invest”
above;
●
can
reasonably benefit from an investment in our Bonds based on your
overall investment objectives and portfolio structure;
●
are
able to bear the economic risk of the investment based on your
overall financial situation;
●
are in
a financial position appropriate to enable you to realize to a
significant extent the benefits described in this offering circular
of an investment in our Bonds; and
●
have
apparent understanding of:
●
the
fundamental risks of the investment;
●
the
risk that you may lose your entire investment;
●
the
lack of liquidity of our Bonds;
●
the
restrictions on transferability of our Bonds; and
●
the tax
consequences of your investment.
Relevant
information for this purpose will include at least your age,
investment objectives, investment experience, income, net worth,
financial situation, and other investments as well as any other
pertinent factors. The Selling Group Members and registered
investment advisors recommending the purchase of Bonds in this
offering must maintain, for a six-year period, records of the
information used to determine that an investment in Bonds is
suitable and appropriate for you.
The Offering
We are
offering a maximum of $50,000,000 of Bonds to the public through
our Managing Broker-Dealer at a price of $1,000.00 per Bond. As of
the date of this Offering Circular, we have sold 19,548 Bonds, or
$19,548,000, in the offering.
Our
manager has arbitrarily determined the selling price of the Bonds
and such price bears no relationship to our book or asset values,
or to any other established criteria for valuing issued or
outstanding Bonds.
The
Bonds are being offered on a “best efforts” basis,
which means generally that the Managing Broker-Dealer is required
to use only its best efforts to sell the Bonds and it has no firm
commitment or obligation to purchase any of the Bonds. The offering
will continue until the Offering Termination. Our company will
conduct closings in this offering at its discretion, the Closing
Dates and each, a Closing Date, until the Offering Termination. On
the Closing Dates, offering proceeds for that closing will be
disbursed to our company and the respective Bonds will be issued to
investors in the offering, or the Bondholders. The offering is
being made on a best-efforts basis through JCC, our Managing
Broker-Dealer.
Managing Broker-Dealer and Compensation We Will Pay for the Sale of
Our Bonds
Our
Managing Broker-Dealer will receive selling commissions of 5% of
the gross offering proceeds. Our Managing Broker-Dealer also will
receive a Managing Broker-Dealer Fee of up to 3% of the aggregate
gross offering proceeds as compensation for acting as the Managing
Broker-Dealer. Our Managing Broker-Dealer shall be entitled to
retain, out of the Managing Broker-Dealer Fee, an amount equal to
0.57% of the gross proceeds of the offering. In addition, our
Managing Broker-Dealer may reallow all or a portion of selling
commissions to Selling Group Members. Additionally, we have agreed
to pay up to $60,000, in due diligence expense reimbursements
to our Managing Broker-Dealer, which it may reallow to
participating broker-dealers. Total underwriting compensation to be
received by or paid to participating FINRA member broker-dealers,
including commissions, Managing Broker-Dealer Fee, and reimbursed
due diligence expenses of broker-dealers will not exceed 8.12% of
proceeds raised with the assistance of those participating FINRA
member broker-dealers.
Set
forth below is a table indicating the estimated compensation and
expenses that will be paid in connection with the offering to our
Managing Broker-Dealer.
|
|
|
|
|
Offering:
|
|
|
|
Price to
public
|
$1,000.00
|
$50,000,000
|
|
Less selling
commissions
|
$50.00
|
$2,500,000
|
|
Less Managing
Broker-Dealer Fee
|
$30.00
|
$1,500,000
|
|
Less Due Diligence
Expense Reimbursements
|
$1.20
|
$60,000
|
|
Remaining
Proceeds
|
$918.80
|
$45,940,000
|
We have
agreed to indemnify our Managing Broker-Dealer, the Selling Group
Members and selected registered investment advisors, against
certain liabilities arising under the Securities Act. However, the
SEC takes the position that indemnification against liabilities
arising under the Securities Act is against public policy and is
unenforceable.
Included within the
compensation described above and not in addition to, our manager
may pay certain costs associated with the sale and distribution of
our Bonds, including salaries of wholesalers. We will not reimburse
our manager for such payments. Nonetheless, such payments will be
deemed to be “underwriting compensation” by FINRA. In
accordance with the rules of FINRA, the table above sets forth the
nature and estimated amount of all items that will be viewed as
“underwriting compensation” by FINRA that are
anticipated to be paid by us and our sponsor in connection with the
offering. The amounts shown assume we sell all of the Bonds offered
hereby and that all Bonds are sold in our offering through Selling
Group Members, which is the distribution channel with the highest
possible selling commissions and a Managing Broker-Dealer
Fee.
It is
illegal for us to pay or award any commissions or other
compensation to any person engaged by you for investment advice as
an inducement to such advisor to advise you to purchase any of our
Bonds; however, nothing herein will prohibit a registered
broker-dealer or other properly licensed person from earning a
sales commission in connection with a sale of the
Bonds.
Volume-Weighted
Discount.
We
are offering the volume-weighted Discount to the Price to Public of
$1,000.00 described below. The Discount applicable to certain sales
is specified in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
20
– 29 Bonds
|
3%
|
$970
|
|
30
– 39 Bonds
|
4%
|
$960
|
|
40
or more Bonds
|
5%
|
$950
|
All
other terms of the offering and the Bonds, including the Price to
Public of $1,000.00 shall remain the same. The Bonds shall continue
to be denominated in $1,000.00 increments. Any Discounts applied
will reduce net proceeds to the Company.
Discounts for Bonds Purchased by Certain Persons
We may
pay reduced or no selling commissions and/or Managing Broker-Dealer
Fees in connection with the sale of Bonds in this offering
to:
|
|
●
|
registered
principals or representatives of our dealer-manager or a
participating broker (and immediate family members of any of the
foregoing persons);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
employees, officers and directors or those of our manager, or the
affiliates of any of the foregoing entities (and the immediate
family members of any of the foregoing persons), any benefit plan
established exclusively for the benefit of such persons or
entities, and, if approved by our board of directors, joint venture
partners, consultants and other service providers;
|
|
|
●
|
clients
of an investment advisor registered under the Investment Advisers
Act of 1940 or under applicable state securities laws (other than
any registered investment advisor that is also registered as a
broker-dealer, with the exception of clients who have
“wrap” accounts which have asset based fees with such
dually registered investment advisor/broker-dealer);
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
persons
investing in a bank trust account with respect to which the
authority for investment decisions made has been delegated to the
bank trust department.
|
For
purposes of the foregoing, “immediate family members”
means such person’s spouse, parents, children, brothers,
sisters, grandparents, grandchildren and any such person who is so
related by marriage such that this includes “step-” and
“-in-law” relations as well as such persons so related
by adoption. In addition, participating brokers contractually
obligated to their clients for the payment of fees on terms
inconsistent with the terms of acceptance of all or a portion of
the selling commissions and/or Managing Broker-Dealer Fees may
elect not to accept all or a portion of such compensation. In that
event, such Bonds will be sold to the investor at a per Bond
purchase price, net of all or a portion of selling commissions
and/or Managing Broker-Dealer Fees. All sales must be made through
a registered broker-dealer participating in this offering, and
investment advisors must arrange for the placement of sales
accordingly. The net proceeds to us will not be affected by
reducing or eliminating selling commissions and/or Managing
Broker-Dealer Fees payable in connection with sales to or through
the persons described above. Purchasers purchasing net of some or
all of the selling commissions and Managing Broker-Dealer Fees will
receive Bonds in principal amount of $1,000 per Bond
purchased.
Either
through this offering or subsequently on any secondary market,
affiliates of our company may buy bonds if and when they choose.
There are no restrictions to these purchases. Affiliates that
become Bondholders will have rights on parity with all other
Bondholders.
How to Invest
Subscription Agreement
All
investors will be required to complete and execute a subscription
agreement in the form filed as an exhibit to the Offering Statement
of which this Offering Circular is a part. The subscription
agreement is available from your registered representative or
financial adviser and should be delivered to GK Investment
Holdings, LLC, c/o Great Lakes Fund Solutions at 500 Park
Avenue, Suite 114, Lake Villa, Illinois 60046, together with
payment in full by check or wire of your subscription purchase
price in accordance with the instructions in the subscription
agreement. We anticipate that we will hold closings for purchases
of the Bonds on a semi-monthly or monthly basis.
Proceeds will be
held with the escrow agent in an escrow account subject to
compliance with Exchange Act Rule 15c2-4 until closing occurs. Our
Managing Broker-Dealer and/or the Selling Group Members will submit
a subscriber’s form(s) of payment in compliance with Exchange
Act Rule 15c2-4, generally by noon of the next business day
following receipt of the subscriber’s subscription agreement
and form(s) of payment.
You
will be required to represent and warrant in your subscription
agreement that you are an accredited investor as defined under Rule
501 of Regulation D or that your investment in the Bonds does not
exceed 10% of your net worth or annual income, whichever is
greater, if you are a natural person, or 10% of your revenues or
net assets, whichever is greater, calculated as of your most recent
fiscal year if you are a non-natural person. By completing and
executing your subscription agreement you will also acknowledge and
represent that you have received a copy of this Offering Circular,
you are purchasing the Bonds for your own account and that your
rights and responsibilities regarding your Bonds will be governed
by the indenture and the form of global bond certificate each filed
as an exhibit to the Offering Statement of which this Offering
Circular is a part.
Book-Entry, Delivery and Form
All
Bonds are being issued to investors in book-entry only format and
will be represented by global bond certificates, or certificates,
deposited with a nominee holder. The nominee holders are: (i)
the Depository Trust Company, or DTC, or its nominee Cede & Co.
for purchasers purchasing through DTC participants; and (ii) Direct
Transfer LLC, or Direct Transfer, for purchasers not purchasing
through a DTC Participant.
We have
gained eligibility for the Bonds to be issued and held through the
book-entry systems and procedures of DTC and intend for all Bonds
purchased through DTC participants to be held via DTC’s
book-entry systems and to be represented by certificates registered
in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC’s nominee). For investors
not purchasing through a DTC participant, the certificates
representing their Bonds will be registered in the name of, and
held by Direct Transfer. We may, in our sole discretion, alter the
nominee for Bonds sold without a DTC participant.
So long
as nominees as described above are the registered owners of the
certificates representing the Bonds, such nominees will be
considered the sole owners and holders of the Bonds for all
purposes of the Bonds and the Indenture. Owners of beneficial
interests in the Bonds will not be entitled to have the
certificates registered in their names, will not receive or be
entitled to receive physical delivery of the Bonds in definitive
form and will not be considered the owners or holders under the
Indenture, including for purposes of receiving any reports
delivered by us or the trustee pursuant to the Indenture.
Accordingly, each person owning a beneficial interest in a Bond
registered to DTC or its nominee must rely on either the procedures
of DTC or its nominee on the one hand, and, if such entity is not a
participant, on the procedures of the participant through which
such person owns its interest, in order to exercise any rights of a
Bondholder. Purchasers owning a beneficial interest in a Bond
registered to Direct Transfer, or another nominee holder as
selected by our company, will rely on the procedures of Direct
Transfer or such nominee holder in order exercise its rights a
Bondholder.
As a
result:
|
|
●
|
you
will not be entitled to receive a certificate representing your
interest in the Bonds;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
all
references in this Offering Circular to actions by Bondholders will
refer to actions taken by DTC upon instructions from its direct
participants, or by Direct Transfer by Bondholders holding
beneficial interests in the Bonds registered in its name;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
all
references in this Offering Circular to payments and notices to
Bondholders will refer either to (i) payments and notices to DTC or
Cede & Co. for distribution to you in accordance with DTC
procedures, or (ii) payments and notices to Direct Transfer or such
other nominee holder for distribution to you in accordance with
their applicable procedures.
|
The Depository Trust Company
We have
obtained the information in this section concerning DTC and its
book-entry systems and procedures from sources that we believe to
be reliable. The description of the clearing system in this section
reflects our understanding of the rules and procedures of DTC as
they are currently in effect. DTC could change its rules and
procedures at any time.
DTC
will act as securities depositary for the Bonds registered in the
name of its nominee, Cede & Co. DTC is:
|
|
●
|
a
limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking
Law;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
“banking organization” under the New York Banking
Law;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
member of the Federal Reserve System;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
“clearing corporation” under the New York Uniform
Commercial Code; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
“clearing agency” registered under the provisions of
Section 17A of the Exchange Act.
|
DTC
holds securities that its direct participants deposit with DTC. DTC
facilitates the settlement among direct participants of securities
transactions, such as transfers and pledges, in deposited
securities through electronic computerized book-entry changes in
direct participants’ accounts, thereby eliminating the need
for physical movement of securities certificates.
Direct
participants of DTC include securities brokers and dealers, banks,
trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other
organizations. DTC is owned by a number of its direct participants.
Indirect participants of DTC, such as securities brokers and
dealers, banks and trust companies, can also access the DTC system
if they maintain a custodial relationship with a direct
participant.
Purchases of Bonds
under DTC’s system must be made by or through direct
participants, which will receive a credit for the Bonds on
DTC’s records. The ownership interest of each beneficial
owner is in turn to be recorded on the records of direct
participants and indirect participants. Beneficial owners will not
receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase, but
beneficial owners are expected to receive written confirmations
providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic
statements of their holdings, from the direct participants or
indirect participants through which such beneficial owners entered
into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the Bonds
are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of participants
acting on behalf of beneficial owners. Beneficial owners will not
receive certificates representing their ownership interests in the
Bonds.
Conveyance of
notices and other communications by DTC to direct participants, by
direct participants to indirect participants and by direct
participants and indirect participants to beneficial owners will be
governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or
regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to
time.
Direct Transfer LLC
All
Bonds not purchased through a DTC participant will be registered in
the name of Direct Transfer. Direct Transfer is a Delaware
corporation. Direct purchasers of Bonds registered through Direct
Transfer will receive a credit for Bonds on Direct Transfer’s
records. Beneficial owners registered through Direct Transfer will
receive written confirmation from UMB Bank, our Bond registrar,
upon closing of their purchases. Transfers of Bonds registered to
Direct Transfer will be accomplished by entries made on the books
of UMB Bank at the behest of Direct Transfer acting on
behalf of its beneficial holders.
Book-Entry Format
Under
the book-entry format, UMB Bank, as our paying agent, will pay
interest or principal payments to Cede & Co., as nominee
of DTC, and to Direct Transfer. DTC will forward all payments it
receives to the direct participants, who will then forward the
payment to the indirect participants or to you as the beneficial
owner. Direct Transfer will forward payments directly to beneficial
owners of Bonds registered to Direct Transfer. You may experience
some delay in receiving your payments under this system. Neither
we, the trustee, nor any paying agent or sub-paying agent has any
direct responsibility or liability for the payment of principal or
interest on the Bonds to owners of beneficial interests in the
certificates.
DTC is
required to make book-entry transfers on behalf of its direct
participants and is required to receive and transmit payments of
principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds. Any direct
participant or indirect participant with which you have an account
is similarly required to make book-entry transfers and to receive
and transmit payments with respect to the notes on your behalf. We
and the trustee under the Indenture have no responsibility for any
aspect of the actions of DTC or any of its direct or indirect
participants or of Direct Transfer or Great Lakes. In addition, we
and the trustee under the Indenture have no responsibility or
liability for any aspect of the records kept by DTC or any of its
direct or indirect participants or Direct Transfer or Great Lakes
relating to or payments made on account of beneficial ownership
interests in the Bonds or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing
any records relating to such beneficial ownership interests. We
also do not supervise these systems in any way.
The
trustee will not recognize you as a Bondholder under the Indenture,
and you can only exercise the rights of a Bondholder indirectly
through DTC and its direct participants or through Direct Transfer,
as applicable. DTC has advised us that it will only take action
regarding a Bond if one or more of the direct participants to whom
the Bond is credited directs DTC to take such action and only in
respect of the portion of the aggregate principal amount of the
Bonds as to which that participant or participants has or have
given that direction. DTC can only act on behalf of its direct
participants. Your ability to pledge Bonds, and to take other
actions, may be limited because you will not possess a physical
certificate that represents your Bonds.
If the
global bond certificate representing your Bonds is held by DTC,
conveyance of notices and other communications by the trustee to
the beneficial owners, and vice versa, will occur via DTC. The
trustee will communicate directly with DTC. DTC will then
communicate to direct participants. The direct participants will
communicate with the indirect participants, if any. Then, direct
participants and indirect participants will communicate to
beneficial owners. Such communications will be governed by
arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory
requirements as may be in effect from time to time.
If the
global bond certificate representing your Bonds is held by Direct
Transfer, conveyance of notices and other communications by the
trustee to the beneficial owners, and vice versa, will occur via
Direct Transfer. The trustee will communicate directly with Direct
Transfer, which will communicate directly or through Great Lakes
Fund Solutions, who may be designated by Direct Transfer to handle
investor communications on its behalf, with the beneficial
owners.
The Trustee
UMB
Bank has agreed to be the trustee under the Indenture. The
Indenture contains certain limitations on the rights of the
trustee, should it become one of our creditors, to obtain payment
of claims in certain cases, or to realize on certain property
received in respect of any claim as security or otherwise. The
trustee will be permitted to engage in other transactions with us
and our affiliates.
The
Indenture provides that in case an Event of Default (as defined
herein) specified in the Indenture shall occur and not be cured,
the trustee will be required, in the exercise of its power, to use
the degree of care of a reasonable person in the conduct of his own
affairs. Subject to such provisions, the trustee will be under no
obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers under the
Indenture at the request of any Bondholder, unless the Bondholder
has offered to the trustee security and indemnity satisfactory to
it against any loss, liability or expense.
Resignation or Removal of the Trustee.
The
trustee may resign at any time, or may be removed by the holders of
a majority of the principal amount of then-outstanding Bonds. In
addition, upon the occurrence of contingencies relating generally
to the insolvency of the trustee, we may remove the trustee or a
court of competent jurisdiction may remove the trustee upon
petition of a holder of certificates. However, no resignation or
removal of the trustee may become effective until a successor
trustee has been appointed.
We are
offering the Bonds pursuant to an exemption to the Trust Indenture
Act of 1939, or the Trust Indenture Act. As a result, investors in
our Bonds will not be afforded the benefits and protections of the
Trust Indenture Act. However, in certain circumstances, our
Indenture makes reference to the substantive provisions of the
Trust Indenture Act.
Registrar and Paying Agent
We have
designated UMB Bank as paying agent for the Bonds and Direct
Transfer as sub-paying agent in respect of Bonds registered to it.
UMB Bank will also act as registrar for the Bonds. The Bonds will
be issued in book-entry form only, evidenced by global
certificates, as such, payments will be made to DTC, its nominee or
to Direct Transfer.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
We are
focused on acquiring income producing commercial rental properties
for the purpose of holding and operating the acquired properties,
and if the need arises, to redevelop the rental properties for an
alternative use other than the intended use at the time of
acquisition. We expect that most of the acquired assets will be
held through wholly- owned or majority-owned subsidies and the
assets will be acquired by assuming either existing financing
secured by the asset or by borrowing new funds.
We
filed an offering statement on Form 1-A with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on December 23,
2015, which offering statement was qualified by the SEC on
September 30, 2016. Pursuant to the offering statement, we are
offering up to a maximum of $50,000,000 of 7% unsecured bonds, or
the Bonds. The purchase price per Bond is $1,000, with a minimum
purchase amount of $5,000. Assuming that the maximum amount of
Bonds purchased and issued, we anticipate that the net proceeds
will be $44,650,000 and will be used to pay down existing
indebtedness and acquire rental properties in our target asset
class. As of June 30, 2018, we had sold $11,948,000 of
Bonds.
We are
managed by GK Development, Inc., or GK Development, a real estate
acquisition, development and management company located in
Barrington, Illinois, formed in 1994. We benefit from GK
Development’s real estate operating and leasing skills,
including releasing, redeveloping, renovating, refinancing,
repositioning and selling.
Lake Mead Crossing
On
November 12, 2015, we acquired, through wholly-owned subsidiaries,
a commercial rental property located in Henderson, Nevada, known as
Lake Mead Crossing, for a total purchase price of $42,065,000,
excluding prorations. Upon acquisition, Lake Mead Crossing
consisted of multiple buildings aggregating approximately 221,200
square feet of rentable commercial space. Lake Mead Crossing is
part of a larger shopping center shadow anchored by a Target
consisting of approximately 152,000 square feet. Lake Mead Crossing
is owned by two of our subsidiaries, Lake Mead Partners, LLC, or LM
Partners, and Lake Mead Development, LLC, or LM Development. Lake
Mead Parent, LLC, or LM Parent, which is our wholly-owned
subsidiary, is the sole member of LM Partners. Upon acquisition, LM
Partners owned a portion of Lake Mead Crossing, consisting of
approximately 155,100 square feet of rentable commercial space.
Upon acquisition, LM Development, owned the other portion of Lake
Mead Crossing consisting of approximately 66,000 square feet of
rentable commercial space.
Lake
Mead Crossing was purchased with the use of mortgage debt and
mezzanine debt. LM Partners received mortgage debt of $29,500,000
from Nevada State Bank, and LM Development received mortgage debt
of $2,700,000 from Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A., or
Barrington Bank. In addition to the mortgage financing, LM Partners
and LM Development entered into mezzanine loan agreements with GK
Development and GK Secured Income IV, LLC or GKSI IV, an affiliate
of GK Development. The mezzanine loan agreement with GKSI IV is in
the maximum amount of $10,500,000 at 8% interest, allocated between
LM Partners and LM Development, of which $6,417,483 was outstanding
as of June 30, 2018. The mezzanine loan agreement with GK
Development is in the maximum amount of $2,608,100, or the GK
Development Loan, allocated between LM Partners and LM Development,
all of which was repaid as of December 31, 2017. For more details
on the terms of the financing, please see “Item 3. Financial
Statements” herein and “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions” in the Offering Statement.
After
the acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing, the Company, through LM
Partners, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Pacific
Dental Services, LLC, or PDCS, a former tenant in Lake Mead
Crossing, whereby LM Partners agreed to sell to PDCS the building
partially occupied by PDCS, containing approximately 7,800 rentable
square feet, for $4,000,000, excluding prorations. The sale closed
on March 20, 2017 and $2,700,000 of the sale proceeds was used to
reduce the outstanding principal balance on the Nevada State Bank
note payable and $980,000 of the sales proceeds was used to reduce
the outstanding principal balance on the GK Development
Loan.
As of
June 30, 2018, the portion of Lake Mead Crossing owned by LM
Partners is 97.2% leased and the portion of Lake Mead Crossing
owned by LM Development is 52.5% leased.
2700 Ygnacio
On
January 30, 2017, our Company, through 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of our Company, or Ygnacio Partners,
acquired an office building located at the corner of North Via
Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California, or 2700
Ygnacio, from an unaffiliated seller for $14,905,290, excluding
prorations. 2700 Ygnacio is a three-story, Class A office building
with approximately 108,000 rentable square feet.
As
of June 30, 2018, 2700 Ygnacio is 77.0% leased to numerous tenants
and the leases are expiring on various dates between 2018 and
2022. Corrollo Engineers is the anchor tenant on the property,
occupying 37,156 rentable square feet, or 34.41% of the property,
under a lease currently scheduled to expire on October 31,
2019.
The
purchase of 2700 Ygnacio was financed using (i) a first mortgage
loan in the amount of $11,325,000 from Mutual of Omaha Bank, all of
which was funded upon acquisition, (ii) an interim loan from GK
Development of $2,305,000, or the GK Development Loan II, and (iii)
proceeds from this offering of $1,750,000. For more details on the
terms of the financing, please see “Item 3. Financial
Statements” herein and “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions” in the Offering Statement.
We
used Bond proceeds to repay the GK Development Loan II in
2017.
Financial Summary
For
the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, GK Investment Holdings,
Inc $2,960,627, consolidated net income before depreciation,
amortization and gain on sale of rental property of $395,247 and
consolidated net income of $467,999.
In
the most recent six-month period ending June 30, 2018, we had
revenue of $2,905,125, consolidated net income before depreciation,
and consolidated net loss of $1,093,358.
Results of Operation
We
operate on a calendar year. Set forth below is a discussion of our
operating results for the first half of 2018, from January 1, 2018
to June 30, 2018.
As
of June 30, 2018, we had the following two assets, (i) a commercial
rental property located in Henderson, Nevada, known as Lake Mead
Crossing, which consists of multiple buildings aggregating
approximately 213,400 square feet of rentable commercial space,
taking into account the sale of a portion of Lake Mead Crossing to
PDCS, and (ii) a Class A office building located in Walnut Creek,
California consisting of approximately 108,000 square feet of
rentable commercial space. Lake Mead Crossing was acquired on
November 12, 2015 and GK Development assumed management
responsibilities on May 1, 2016. 2700 Ygnacio was acquired on
January 30, 2017 and GK Development assumed management
responsibilities on the acquisition date.
For
the six months ended June 30, 2018, our total revenues from
operations amounted to $2,905,125. Operating costs for the same
period, including depreciation and amortization of $1,441,872 but
excluding interest expense of $1,658,484, amounted to $2,346,715.
This resulted in operating income of $558,410. Net loss for the
same period amounted to $1,093,358 after taking into account
interest expense of $1,658,484, and miscellaneous income of
$6,520.
For
the six months ended June 30, 2017, our total revenues from
operations amounted to $2,960,627. Operating costs for the same
period, including depreciation and amortization of $1,666,130 but
excluding interest expense of $1,615,817, amounted to $2,619,009.
This resulted in operating income of $341,618. Net gain for the
same period amounted to $126,381 after taking into account interest
expense of $2,381,086 and miscellaneous income of
$3,305.
We
are working diligently to identify assets in our target asset class
and to acquire such assets in the timeframe that is customary in
the real estate industry.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our
principal demands for cash are for acquisition costs, including the
purchase price of any additional properties, loans and securities
we acquire, improvement costs, the payment of our operating and
administrative expenses, and all continuing debt service
obligations, including our Bond Service Obligations. Generally, we
will fund additional acquisitions from the net proceeds of this
offering. We intend to acquire additional assets with cash and
mortgage or other debt, but we also may acquire assets free and
clear of permanent mortgage or other indebtedness by paying the
entire purchase price for the asset in cash. As we are dependent on
capital raised in this offering to conduct our business, our
investment activity over the next twelve (12) months will be
dictated by the capital raised in this offering. We expect to
acquire additional properties and meet our business objectives
regardless of the amount of capital raised in this offering. If the
capital raised in this offering is insufficient to purchase
additional properties solely with conventional mortgage debt, we
will implement a strategy of utilizing a mix of capital, mortgage
debt and mezzanine debt (similar to the Lake Mead Crossing and 2700
Ygnacio acquisitions) to acquire properties. Further, our
company expects that it will be able to meet its cash requirements
regardless of the amount of capital raised by drawing upon the Cash
Flow Loans and the cash flows of properties we own.
We
expect to use debt financing as a source of capital. We have no
limits on the amount of leverage we may employ; however, senior
property debt is generally expected to be approximately 65% of the
cost of our investments. See “Investment
Policies” for more information.
We
anticipate that adequate cash will continue to be generated from
operations to fund our operating and administrative expenses, and
all continuing debt service obligations, including the Bond Service
Obligations. However, our ability to finance our operations is
subject to some uncertainties. Our ability to generate working
capital is dependent on our ability to attract and retain tenants
and the economic and business environments of the various markets
in which our properties are located. Our ability to sell our assets
is partially dependent upon the state of real estate markets and
the ability of purchasers to obtain financing at reasonable
commercial rates. In general, we intend to pay debt service from
cash flow from operations. If cash flow from operations is
insufficient then our Cash Flow Lenders are obligated to make the
Cash Flow Loans to us. If we have not generated sufficient cash
flow from our operations and other sources, such as from
borrowings, including the Cash Flow Loans, we may use funds out of
the Debt Service Reserve. Moreover, our manager may change this
policy, in its sole discretion, at any time. See
“Description
of Company’s Securities - Certain Covenants” in
this Offering Circular for more information.
Potential future
sources of capital include secured or unsecured financings from
banks or other lenders, establishing additional lines of credit,
proceeds from the sale of properties and undistributed cash flow.
Note that, currently, we have not identified any additional source
of financing, other than the proceeds of this offering, and there
is no assurance that such sources of financing will be available on
favorable terms or at all.
As
of June 30, 2018, we had cash on hand of $1,569,096 and restricted
cash (funded reserves) of $687,829. The funded reserves are
required as a condition precedent of the mortgage loans payable and
the Indenture related to the Bonds, which requires 7% of the gross
proceeds from the offering of our Bonds be placed into a reserve
account held by the Bond trustee until October 17, 2017. We are
currently offering investors the opportunity to purchase up to a
maximum of $50,000,000 of Bonds. of which, $11,948,000 were sold as
of June 30, 2018. We anticipate that the total net proceeds of the
offering, if successful, and assuming we sell the remaining Bonds
at the Price to the Public, will amount to $44,650,000, which will
enable us to pursue acquisitions of commercial real estate assets
in our target asset class and thereby increase cash
flows.
The
Company is offering $50,000,000 of the Bonds at a purchase price of
$1,000 per Bond, subject to the volume-weighted discount. The
Bonds, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 7% per annum, will
mature on September 30, 2022. As of June 30, 2018, $11,948,000 of
Bonds have been sold and through September 26, 2018, $19,458,000
have been sold. The proceeds from the offering received to date
have been used for the acquisition of 2700 Ygnacio, and it is our
intention to use future proceeds to repay a portion of existing
mezzanine debt and other existing indebtedness and acquire
additional commercial rental properties in our target asset
class.
GENERAL INFORMATION AS TO OUR COMPANY
GK
Investment Holdings, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company
formed on September 14, 2015 that invests in and operates
commercial rental properties, leases such properties to multiple
tenants, and makes such other real estate related investments as
are consistent with its investment objectives and that GK
Development, Inc., GK Development, our manager, deems appropriate.
Our company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, owns and operates
one such property, Lake Mead Crossing. The office of our company
and GK Development are located at 257 East Main Street, Suite 200,
Barrington, IL 60010, and the telephone number is (847)
277-9930.
GK
Development is an Illinois corporation. GK Development is
responsible for managing our company’s affairs and for
identifying and making acquisitions and dispositions on our
company’s behalf. GK Development is a commercial real estate
acquisition and development company specializing in the
acquisition, management and redevelopment of commercial rental
properties such as regional malls and neighborhood shopping
centers. GK Development controls a portfolio of real estate assets
currently valued at over $500,000,000, the majority of which are
commercial rental properties.
GK
Development’s management team is comprised of operation
managers who are responsible for the day-to-day operation of GK
Development and our company. See “Directors and Executive
Officers” for more information on the management team
of GK Development and our company.
Operating Agreement
Formation and Purpose
Our
company was formed on September 14, 2015. Our company is governed
by its operating agreement, dated as of September 14, 2015 and
entered into under the laws of the State of Delaware, or the
Operating Agreement. Under the Operating Agreement, our company was
formed with the intent to acquire, own, redevelop, and operate
commercial real estate. Notwithstanding the intended purposes of
our company, pursuant to the Operating Agreement, our company is
permitted to transact any lawful business not required to be stated
specifically in the Operating Agreement and for which limited
liability companies may be formed under the Delaware Limited
Liability Company Act (Title 6, Subtitle II, Chapter 18), as
amended from time to time. See “Risk Factors – Risks
Related to this Offering and Our Corporate Structure”
for more information.
Management
The
management of our company is entrusted solely to GK Development for
as long as it remains the sole manager of our company. Only the
members of our company have the right to remove our manager, and
only if our manager has made a decision to file a voluntary
petition or otherwise initiate proceedings to have it adjudicated
insolvent, or to seek an order for relief as debtor under the
United States Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. §§ 101
et seq.); to file any
petition seeking any composition, reorganization, readjustment,
liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under the present or any
future federal bankruptcy laws or any other present or future
applicable federal, state or other statute or law relative to
bankruptcy, insolvency, or other relief for debtors; to seek the
appointment of any trustee, receiver, conservator, assignee,
sequestrator, custodian, liquidator (or other similar official) of
our company or of all or any substantial part of the assets of our
company, to make any general assignment for the benefit of
creditors of our company, to admit in writing the inability of our
company to pay its debts generally as they become due, or to
declare or effect a moratorium on our company’s debt or to
take any action in furtherance of any of the above proscribed
actions. Bondholders will have no rights in the management of our
company.
Under
the Operating Agreement, certain powers are reserved for our
manager. The approval of our manager is required for the following
actions with respect to our company:
|
|
●
|
Amendment
of the Certificate of Formation or the Operating
Agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
conversion of our company to another type of entity organized
within or without the state of Delaware, including without
limitation, a limited partnership;
|
|
|
●
|
Merger,
equity interest exchange, business combination or consolidation
with any other entity, excepting a wholly-owned
subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Creating
or authorizing any new class or series of units or equity, or
selling, issuing or granting additional units;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
A
decision to file a voluntary petition or otherwise initiate
proceedings to have our company adjudicated insolvent, or seeking
an order for relief of our company as debtor under the United
States Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.); to
file any petition seeking any composition, reorganization,
readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under the
present or any future federal bankruptcy laws or any other present
or future applicable federal, state or other statute or law
relative to bankruptcy, insolvency, or other relief for debtors
with respect to our company; or to seek the appointment of any
trustee, receiver, conservator, assignee, sequestrator, custodian,
liquidator (or other similar official) of our company or of all or
any substantial part of the assets of our company, or to make any
general assignment for the benefit of creditors of our company, or
to admit in writing the inability of our company to pay its debts
generally as they become due, or to declare or effect a moratorium
on our company’s debt or to take any action in furtherance of
any of the above proscribed actions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Any
decision to dissolve or liquidate our company, except as
specifically set forth in the Operating Agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Approving
any budget or strategic or business plan for our company or any of
its affiliates;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Except
with respect to an affiliate of our company, making any investment
in any entity;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Encumbering
all of the assets of our company or any affiliate of our company;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Making
any distributions of Company cash or other property except as
specifically provided in the Operating Agreement.
|
Membership
Our
company has one class of units, Class A Units. Mr. Garo Kholamian
owns a 10.209% Membership Interest, individually, and he controls
an additional 57.60% through certain members that he controls. As a
result, Mr. Garo Kholamian has a beneficial Membership Interest of
67.81%. Mrs. Nancy Kholamian owns a 6.21% Membership Interest, and
she controls an additional 6.40% through a certain member that she
controls. As a result, Mrs. Nancy Kholamian has a beneficial
Membership Interest of 12.61%.
Membership provides
certain protections and rights to the members. Pursuant to the
Operating Agreement, upon approval by GK Development and
recommendation to the members, a majority of the members, either
present and voting at a meeting duly called and held or acting by
written consent shall be required to approve the following actions
with respect to our company:
|
|
●
|
Amendment
of the Certificate of Formation or, subject to Section 10.13, the
Operating Agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Merger,
equity interest exchange, business combination or consolidation
with any other Person, except a wholly-owned subsidiary, in which
our company is not the surviving entity;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
A
Terminating Capital Transaction;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
A
decision to file a voluntary petition or otherwise initiate
proceedings to have our company adjudicated insolvent, or seeking
an order for relief of our company as debtor under the United
States Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.); to
file any petition seeking any composition, reorganization,
readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under the
present or any future federal bankruptcy laws or any other present
or future applicable federal, state or other statute or law
relative to bankruptcy, insolvency, or other relief for debtors
with respect to our company; or to seek the appointment of any
trustee, receiver, conservator, assignee, sequestrator, custodian,
liquidator (or other similar official) of our company or of all or
any substantial part of the assets of our company, or to make any
general assignment for the benefit of creditors of our company, or
to admit in writing the inability of our company to pay its debts
generally as they become due, or to declare or effect a moratorium
on our company’s debt or to take any action in furtherance of
any of the above proscribed actions; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Any
decision to dissolve or liquidate our company, except as
specifically set forth in this Agreement.
|
Indemnification
Our
Operating Agreement limits the liability of our manager, GK
Development and certain other persons or entities. See
“Limitations on
Liability” in this Offering Circular for more
information.
POLICY
WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES
Issuance of Additional Securities
Except
for those actions specifically discussed in this Offering Circular,
the issuing of the Bonds will not impose any restrictions on the
ability of our company to issue additional bonds, debt, preferred
equity or other security. The Bonds will be our direct, senior
unsecured obligations and will:
|
|
●
|
rank
equally with each other and with all of our existing and future
unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness outstanding from time to
time;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
rank
senior to all of our future indebtedness that by its terms is
expressly subordinate to the Bonds;
|
|
|
●
|
effectively
rank junior to any of our future secured indebtedness to the extent
of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
effectively
be structurally subordinated to all existing and future
indebtedness and other obligations of each of our subsidiaries,
including the claims of mortgage lenders holding secured
indebtedness, as to the specific property receiving each
lender’s mortgage and other secured
indebtedness.
|
See
“Description of Bonds -
Certain Covenants” for more information.
Reports
We will
furnish the following reports to each Bondholders:
Reporting Requirements under Tier II
of Regulation A. We are required to comply with certain
ongoing disclosure requirements under Rule 257 of Regulation A. We
are required to file: an annual report with the SEC on Form 1-K; a
semi-annual report with the SEC on Form 1-SA; current reports with
the SEC on Form 1-U; and a notice under cover of Form 1-Z. The
necessity to file current reports is triggered by certain corporate
events, similar to the ongoing reporting obligation faced by
issuers under the Exchange Act, however the requirement to file a
Form 1-U is expected to be triggered by significantly fewer
corporate events than that of the Form 8-K. Parts I & II of
Form 1-Z will be filed by us if and when we decide to and are no
longer obligated to file and provide annual reports pursuant to the
requirements of Regulation A.
Annual Reports. As soon as
practicable, but in no event later than one hundred twenty (120)
days after the close of our fiscal year, ending December
31st, our
manager will cause to be mailed or made available, by any
reasonable means, to each Bondholder as of a date selected by our
manager, an annual report containing financial statements of our
company for such fiscal year, presented in accordance with GAAP,
including a balance sheet and statements of operations, Company
equity and cash flows, with such statements having been audited by
an accountant selected by our manager. Our manager shall be deemed
to have made a report available to each Bondholder as required if
it has either (i) filed such report with the SEC via its Electronic
Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) system and such
report is publicly available on such system or (ii) made such
report available on any website maintained by our company and
available for viewing by the Bondholders.
INVESTMENT POLICIES OF OUR COMPANY
Investment Strategy
Our
company focuses on investments in existing, income-producing,
commercial rental real estate that will benefit from GK
Development’s real estate operating and leasing skills,
including releasing, redevelopment, renovation, refinancing,
repositioning and sale. Our company, through wholly-owned
subsidiaries, currently owns and operates Lake Mead Crossing and
2700 Ygnacio. GK Development intends to actively participate in the
management of our company’s properties, rather than holding
the properties as passive investments. The objective of this
strategy is to maximize cash flow and property value at the time of
final disposition. By doing this, GK Development maximizes the
potential of our company to pay its obligations under the Bonds as
they become due. Holding periods for our company’s
investments will vary depending on a number of
factors.
Our
company’s investment strategy is focused primarily on
rental-based commercial real estate that has current income.
Targeted property types include but are not limited to established
regional malls, neighborhood shopping centers, power centers,
grocery-anchored centers, lifestyle centers, office buildings,
multi-family and other commercial properties. The selection of
solid investment opportunities is based, in part, upon the
properties’ potential for enhancement in cash flows and
market value.
Our
company has acquired, and plans to acquire, properties on a
leveraged basis, operate them in a manner to maximize their value
(including execution of any of the aforementioned strategies), and
then sell or refinance them to realize a return.
Our
company generally will purchase individual properties, but in some
cases, it may consider the purchase of a portfolio of properties.
Neither the Operating Agreement nor the Indenture limits the amount
our company may invest in a single property; however, GK
Development intends to diversify our company’s real estate
investments.
Our
company does not intend to act as a land developer in that it is
has no intent to invest in, acquire, own, hold, lease, operate,
manage, maintain, redevelop, sell or otherwise use undeveloped real
property or “raw land,” as a ground up development. Our
company, engaging in its commercial real estate activities, may
have the opportunity to acquire commercial real property which
includes unimproved pad sites for future development and lease-up
opportunities. In such instances, our company will retain the
unimproved pad sites for ground lease, build-to-suit and/or sell
opportunities. In situations where our company has the opportunity
to acquire commercial real property which includes a large tract of
developable raw land, the developable raw land will not be acquired
by our company, but by an entity affiliated with GK Development.
Our company may choose to redevelop real property for an
alternative use than intended when originally acquired or
developed.
Other
than Lake Mead Crossing and 2700 Ygnacio, our company does not own
any properties, nor has it identified any properties which are
probable for acquisition, as of the date of this Offering
Circular.
Dispositions
We may
from time to time dispose of properties if, based upon
management’s periodic review of our portfolio, our manager
determines such action would be in our best interest. In addition,
we may elect to enter into joint ventures or other types of
co-ownership with respect to properties that we already own, either
in connection with acquiring interests in other properties or from
investors to raise equity capital.
Leverage of Properties
Our
company borrows money to acquire its properties when GK Development
determines that it is advantageous to our company. By operating on
a leveraged basis, our company expects that it will have more funds
available for investment in properties and other investments. This
will allow our company to make more investment than would otherwise
be possible, resulting in a more diversified portfolio. Although
our company expects its liability for the repayment of indebtedness
to be limited to the value of the specific property securing the
liability and the rents or profits derived therefrom, our
company’s use of leverage increases the risk of default on
the mortgage payments and a resulting foreclosure of a particular
property. See “Risk Factors”
for more information.
Our
company may borrow any amount necessary to enable our company to
invest the proceeds of this offering in properties. Our company
intends to borrow up to the maximum amount available from its
lenders, thus increasing the number of properties that our company
can acquire as well as enhancing the yield to our company. GK
Development’s experience with prior real estate programs with
similar commercial rental properties has been that lender’s
preferences will be to make loans with an approximately 60-70%
loan-to-value ratio in respect to the properties in the class
targeted by our company. Therefore, our company believes that its
aggregate loan-to-value on its portfolio will be approximately
65%.
Currently, Lake
Mead Crossing has been assessed an aggregate value of approximately
$47,400,000. The $42,065,000 purchase price of Lake Mead Crossing
was funded by: (i) mortgage loans aggregating $32,200,000; (ii) a
mezzanine loan of $8,530,000 and (iii) interim loans aggregating
$1,335,000. Although current loan-to-value ratio of Lake Mead
Crossing is approximately 80.8%, using the current outstanding
balances for all loans. Our company plans to use proceeds from this
offering to repay the mezzanine and interim loans. If our company
repays these loans in their entirety, the loan-to-value ratio for
Lake Mead Crossing will be reduced to 59.9%. With respect to the
Lake Mead Crossing acquisition, management determined the fair
value of the total identifiable net assets with the assistance of a
third party appraiser using the income approach methodology of
valuation. The income approach methodology utilizes the remaining
non-cancelable lease terms as defined in lease agreements, market
rental data, and discount rates. Key assumptions used includes a
capitalization rate of 7.5%, growth rates for market rentals of
3.0%, and a discount rate of 9.0%. The fair value is allocated to
the acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and
improvements), and acquired intangible assets and liabilities
(consisting of above-market and below-market leases, leasing
commissions and acquired in-place leases).
2700
Ygnacio has been assessed an aggregate value of approximately
$18,000,000. The $14,905,200 purchase price of 2700 Ygnacio was
funded by: (i) a mortgage loan of $11,325,000; (ii) an interim loan
of $2,305,000 and (iii) equity from this offering aggregating
$1,750,000. The current loan-to-value ratio for 2700 Ygnacio is
approximately 67.2%, using the current outstanding balances for all
loans. With respect to the 2700 Ygnacio acquisition, management
determined the fair value of the total identifiable net assets with
the assistance of a third party appraiser using the income approach
methodology of valuation. The income approach methodology utilizes
the remaining non-cancelable lease terms as defined in lease
agreements, market rental data, and discount rates. Key assumptions
used includes a capitalization rate of 7.5%, growth rates for
market rentals of 3.0%, and a discount rate of 8.75%. The fair
value is allocated to the acquired tangible assets (consisting of
land, buildings and improvements), and acquired intangible assets
and liabilities (consisting of above-market and below-market
leases, leasing commissions and acquired in-place
leases).
GK
Development may choose to refinance our company’s properties
during the term of a loan. The benefits of refinancing may include
an increased cash flow resulting from reduced debt service
requirements, thus an increase in cash available for payments under
the Bonds, and an increase in property ownership if refinancing
proceeds are reinvested in real estate.
Investments in Real Estate Mortgages
Our
business objectives emphasize equity investments in commercial
rental property. Although we do not presently intend to invest in
mortgages or deeds of trust, other than in a manner that is
ancillary to an equity investment, we may elect, in our discretion,
to invest in mortgages and other types of real estate interests,
including, without limitation, participating or convertible
mortgages. Investments in real estate mortgages run the risk that
one or more borrowers may default under certain mortgages and that
the collateral securing certain mortgages may not be sufficient to
enable us to recoup our full investment.
Investment in Other Securities
Other
than as described above, we do not intend to acquire any additional
securities such as bonds, preferred stocks or common stock, for
investment purposes. From time to time, we may elect to acquire
properties through co-investment or joint venture structures. In
such an instance, we intend to structure such investments so that
we maintain control of the property-owning subsidiary.
Investment Company Act Considerations
We
intend to conduct our operations so that our company and our
subsidiaries are each exempt from registration as an investment
company under the Investment Company Act. Under the Investment
Company Act, in relevant part, a company is an “investment
company” if:
|
|
●
|
pursuant
to Section 3(a)(1)(A), it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged
primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of
investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
pursuant
to Section 3(a)(1)(C), it is engaged, or proposes to engage, in the
business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in
securities and owns or proposes to acquire “investment
securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its
total assets on an unconsolidated basis. “Investment
securities” does not include U.S. Government securities and
securities of majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves
investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the
definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section
3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.
|
We
intend to conduct our operations so that our company and most, if
not all, of its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries own or
proposes to acquire “investment securities” having a
value of not more than 40% of the value of its total assets
(exclusive of government securities and cash items) on an
unconsolidated basis. We will continuously monitor our holdings on
an ongoing basis to determine the compliance of our company and
each wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiary with this test. We
expect that most, if not all, of our company’s wholly-owned
and majority-owned subsidiaries will not be relying on exemptions
under either Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company
Act. Consequently, interests in these subsidiaries (which are
expected to constitute most, if not all, of our assets) generally
will not constitute “investment securities.” We believe
that our company and most, if not all, of its wholly-owned and
majority-owned subsidiaries will not be considered investment
companies under Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company
Act.
In
addition, we believe that neither our company nor any of its
wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries will be considered
investment companies under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment
Company Act because they will not engage primarily or hold
themselves out as being engaged primarily in the business of
investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Rather, our
company and its subsidiaries will be primarily engaged in
non-investment company businesses related to real estate.
Consequently, our company and its subsidiaries expect to be able to
conduct their respective operations such that none of them will be
required to register as an investment company under the Investment
Company Act.
We will
classify our assets for purposes of the Investment Company Act,
including our 3(c)(5)(C) exclusion, in large measure upon no-action
positions taken by the SEC staff in the past. These no-action
positions were issued in accordance with factual situations that
may be substantially different from the factual situations we may
face, and a number of these no-action positions were issued more
than ten years ago. No assurance can be given that the SEC staff
will concur with our classification of our assets. In addition, the
SEC staff may, in the future, issue further guidance that may
require us to re-classify our assets for purposes of the Investment
Company Act. If we are required to re-classify our assets, we may
no longer be in compliance with the exclusion from the definition
of an investment company provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the
Investment Company Act.
For
purposes of determining whether we satisfy the 55%/80% tests, we
will classify the assets in which we invest as
follows:
|
|
●
|
Real
Property. Based on the no-action letters issued by the SEC staff,
we will classify our fee interests in real properties as qualifying
assets. In addition, based on no-action letters issued by the SEC
staff, we will treat our investments in joint ventures, which in
turn invest in qualifying assets such as real property, as
qualifying assets only if we have the right to approve major
decisions affecting the joint venture; otherwise, such investments
will be classified as real estate-related assets. We expect that no
less than 55% of our assets will consist of investments in real
property, including any joint ventures that we
control.
|
|
|
●
|
Securities.
We intend to treat as real estate-related assets debt and equity
securities of both non-majority owned publicly traded and private
companies primarily engaged in real estate businesses, including
REITs and other real estate operating companies, and securities
issued by pass-through entities of which substantially all of the
assets consist of qualifying assets or real estate-related
assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Loans.
Based on the no-action letters issued by the SEC staff, we will
classify our investments in various types of whole loans as
qualifying assets, as long as the loans are “fully
secured” by an interest in real estate at the time we
originate or acquire the loan. However, we will consider loans with
loan-to-value ratios in excess of 100% to be real estate-related
assets. We will treat our mezzanine loan investments as qualifying
assets so long as they are structured as “Tier 1”
mezzanine loans in accordance with the guidance published by the
SEC staff in a no-action letter that discusses the classifications
of Tier 1 mezzanine loans under Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the
Investment Company Act.
|
We will
classify our investments in construction loans as qualifying
assets, as long as the loans are “fully secured” by an
interest in real estate at the time we originate or acquire the
loan. With respect to construction loans that are funded over time,
we will consider the outstanding balance (i.e., the amount of the
loan actually drawn) as a qualifying asset. The SEC staff has not
issued no-action letters specifically addressing construction
loans. If the SEC staff takes a position in the future that is
contrary to our classification, we will modify our classification
accordingly.
Consistent with
no-action positions taken by the SEC staff, we will consider any
participation in a whole mortgage loan, including B-Notes, to be a
qualifying real estate asset only if: (1) we have a participation
interest in a mortgage loan that is fully secured by real property;
(2) we have the right to receive our proportionate share of the
interest and the principal payments made on the loan by the
borrower, and our returns on the loan are based on such payments;
(3) we invest only after performing the same type of due diligence
and credit underwriting procedures that we would perform if we were
underwriting the underlying mortgage loan; (4) we have approval
rights in connection with any material decisions pertaining to the
administration and servicing of the loan and with respect to any
material modification to the loan agreements; and (5) if the loan
becomes non-performing, we have effective control over the remedies
relating to the enforcement of the mortgage loan, including
ultimate control of the foreclosure process, by having the right
to: (a) appoint the special servicer to manage the resolution of
the loan; (b) advise, direct or approve the actions of the special
servicer; (c) terminate the special servicer at any time with or
without cause; (d) cure the default so that the mortgage loan is no
longer non-performing; and (e) purchase the senior loan at par plus
accrued interest, thereby acquiring the entire mortgage
loan.
We will
base our treatment of any other investments as qualifying assets
and real estate-related assets on the characteristics of the
underlying collateral and the particular type of loan (including
whether we have foreclosure rights with respect to those securities
or loans that have underlying real estate collateral) and we will
make these determinations in a manner consistent with guidance
issued by the SEC staff.
Qualification for
exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act will
limit our ability to make certain investments. For example, these
restrictions may limit the ability of our company and its
subsidiaries to invest directly in mortgage-related securities that
represent less than the entire ownership in a pool of mortgage
loans, debt and equity tranches of securitizations and certain
asset-backed securities and real estate companies or in assets not
related to real estate. Although we intend to monitor our
portfolio, there can be no assurance that we will be able to
maintain this exemption from registration for our company or each
of our subsidiaries.
A
change in the value of any of our assets could negatively affect
our ability to maintain our exemption from regulation under the
Investment Company Act. To maintain compliance with the Section
3(c)(5)(C) exclusion, we may be unable to sell assets we would
otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would
otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may have to acquire
additional assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may
have to forego opportunities to acquire assets that we would
otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment
strategy.
To the
extent that the SEC staff provides more specific guidance regarding
any of the matters bearing upon the definition of investment
company and the exceptions to that definition, we may be required
to adjust our investment strategy accordingly. Additional guidance
from the SEC staff could provide additional flexibility to us, or
it could further inhibit our ability to pursue the investment
strategy we have chosen.
If we
are required to register as an investment company under the
Investment Company Act, we would become subject to substantial
regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our
ability to use borrowings), management, operations, transactions
with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act),
and portfolio composition, including restrictions with respect to
diversification and industry concentration and other matters.
Compliance with the Investment Company Act would, accordingly,
limit our ability to make certain investments and require us to
significantly restructure our business plan.
DESCRIPTION OF REAL ESTATE
We
currently own two properties, Lake Mead Crossing and 2700
Ygnacio.
Lake Mead Crossing
On
November 12, 2015, we acquired, through wholly-owned subsidiaries,
a commercial rental property located in Henderson, Nevada, known as
Lake Mead Crossing, for a total purchase price of $42,065,000,
excluding prorations. Upon acquisition, Lake Mead Crossing, which
was our sole asset as of December 31, 2016, consisted of multiple
buildings aggregating approximately 221,200 square feet of rentable
commercial space. Lake Mead Crossing is part of a larger shopping
center shadow anchored by a Target consisting of approximately
152,000 square feet. Lake Mead Crossing is owned by two of our
subsidiaries, Lake Mead Partners, LLC, or LM Partners, and Lake
Mead Development, LLC, or LM Development. Lake Mead Parent, LLC, or
LM Parent, which is our wholly-owned subsidiary, is the sole member
of LM Partners. Upon acquisition, LM Partners owned a portion of
Lake Mead Crossing, consisting of approximately 155,100 square feet
of rentable commercial space, and LM Development, owned the other
portion of Lake Mead Crossing consisting of approximately 66,000
square feet of rentable commercial space.
Lake Mead Crossing was purchased with the use of
mortgage debt and mezzanine debt. LM Partners received mortgage
debt of $29,500,000 from Nevada State Bank, and LM Development
received mortgage debt of $2,700,000 from Barrington Bank &
Trust Co., N.A., or Barrington Bank. In addition to the mortgage
financing, LM Partners and LM Development entered into mezzanine
loan agreements with GK Development and GK Secured Income IV, LLC
or GKSI IV, an affiliate of GK Development. The mezzanine loan
agreement with GKSI IV is in the maximum amount of $10,500,000 at
8% interest, allocated between LM Partners and LM Development, of
which $6,417,483 was outstanding, as of June 30, 2018. The
mezzanine loan agreement with GK Development is in the maximum
amount of $2,608,100, or the GK Development Loan, allocated between
LM Partners and LM Development, of which $0 was outstanding as of
June 30, 2018. For more details on the terms of the financing,
please see “Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions.”
After
the acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing, the Company, through LM
Partners, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Pacific
Dental Services, LLC, or PDCS, a former tenant in Lake Mead
Crossing, whereby LM Partners agreed to sell to PDCS the building
partially occupied by PDCS, containing approximately 7,790 rentable
square feet, for $4,000,000, excluding prorations. The sale closed
on March 20, 2017 and $2,700,000 of the sale proceeds was used to
reduce the outstanding principal balance on the Nevada State Bank
note payable and $980,000 of the sales proceeds was used to reduce
the outstanding principal balance on the GK Development
Loan.
As
of June 30, 2018, the portion of Lake Mead Crossing owned by LM
Partners is 97.2% leased and the portion of Lake Mead Crossing
owned by LM Development is 52.5% leased.
Proposed program for the renovation, improvement or development of
such properties.
With
respect to Lake Mead Parent, LLC, the commercial rental property is
comprised of 147,400 square feet of rentable space for lease to
multiple tenants. As of June 30, 2018, approximately 143,200 square
feet (97.2%) was leased to seventeen tenants under various leases
expiring on various dates between 2019 and 2028. We plan to lease
the vacant retail space and currently, we have no present plans for
the improvement of the property.
With
respect to Lake Development, LLC, the commercial rental property is
comprised of 66,044 square feet of rentable space for lease to
multiple tenants. As of June 30, 2018, 34,700 square feet (52.5%)
was leased to three tenants under various leases expiring on
various dates between 2018 and 2023. We plan to lease the vacant
retail space. In addition, the commercial rental property includes
unimproved pad sites which Lake Mead Development, LLC intends to
secure one or more tenants for a buildtosuit opportunity. These
could include standalone retailers, medical office facilities
and/or restaurants. Currently, no tenants have been secured and
there are no present plans for the improvement of the
property.
Lake
Mead Crossing is a multi-tenant retail shopping center located in
downtown Henderson, Nevada and management believes it has excellent
visibility, access and daytime traffic. The neighborhood is
dominated by retail and other commercial development and is also
provided with an abundance of residential development properties
located in subdivisions scattered throughout the market area.
Additionally, Lake Mead Crossing is located in the path of
substantial residential growth. Cadence, is a 2,200 acre planned
residential development located 0.2 miles from Lake Mead Crossing.
Under the plan for Cadence, multiple developers are expected to
build up to 13,250 homes.
A
summary of the key competitive conditions are as
follows:
|
|
●
|
Lake
Mead Crossing is located in a well performing commercial corridor
with very good visibility;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Lake
Mead Crossing is the only power center located in downtown
Henderson, NV;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Lake
Mead Crossing has a good parking ratio;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Lake
Mead Crossing lies in the Las Vegas metropolitan area;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Lake
Mead Crossing is shadow anchored by a super Target
store.
|
Key Tenant Lease Terms
Below
is a summary of the key lease terms of tenants that currently
occupy at least 10% of our gross leasable area, or
GLA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
Footage
|
30,187
|
26,000
|
27,426
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of GLA
|
14.2%
|
12.2%
|
12.9%
|
14.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly
Base Rent
|
$25,156
|
$29,250
|
$56,618
|
$26,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent/Square
Foot
|
$10.00
|
$13.50
|
$24.77
|
$10.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
Expiration
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Minimum Rent
|
|
|
2018 (Remaining six months)
|
$1,643,069
|
|
2019
|
2,009,212
|
|
2020
|
1,252,788
|
|
2021
|
976,322
|
|
2022
|
827,767
|
|
Thereafter
|
998,345
|
|
Total
|
$7,707,505
|
Schedule of Lease Expirations
The
following chart shows the number of leases expiring at Lake Mead
Crossing in each of the next ten years and the square footage,
percentage of overall leased space, and annual rent relating to
such expiring leases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Lease
Expirations
|
8
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
N/A
|
2
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
1
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
Footage
|
80,413
|
39,487
|
3,800
|
6,500
|
30,000
|
N/A
|
16,470
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
1,180
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Rent
|
$1,778,027
|
$556,196
|
$112,512
|
185,860
|
324,000
|
N/A
|
$282,680
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
$45,595
|
N/A
|
Components Upon Which Depreciation Are Taken
The
following chart provides the details of how tax depreciation is
calculated at Lake Mead Crossing.
|
|
|
FederalTax
Basis
|
|
|
Method
|
|
|
Lifein
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
9,241,793
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building
|
|
$
|
27,535,723
|
|
|
Straight
Line
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Improvements
|
|
$
|
2,448,433
|
|
|
150%
Double Declining Balance
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant Improvements
|
|
$
|
985,304
|
|
|
Straight
Line
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
$
|
40,211,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realty Taxes
The
following chart provides the details of how taxes are assessed at
Lake Mead Crossing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realty
Tax Rate
|
2.90%
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Realty Taxes
|
$211,060
|
Lake
Mead Crossing was financed using 100% debt in the form of mortgage
debt, mezzanine debt and interim debt. In connection with the
financing of Lake Mead Crossing, the following loans are
outstanding:
|
|
●
|
Lake
Mead Partners, LLC, owner of a portion of the property received
mortgage debt totaling $29,500,000 with an additional $500,000 that
it can use if it chooses. To date, $216,327 of the additional
amount has been used. The debt carries an interest rate of 4% and
requires principal and interest payments of $144,703. The loan
matures on November 12, 2025.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Lake
Mead Development, LLC, owner of a portion of the property received
mortgage debt totaling $2,700,000. The debt carries a floating
interest rate equal to the LIBOR plus 2.75% and requires monthly
principal payments of $5,450 plus interest. The loan matures on
November 12, 2022.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Lake
Mead Parent, LLC, the owner of Lake Mead Partners and the
wholly-owned subsidiary of our company, and Lake Mead Development,
LLC received mezzanine debt to purchase Lake Mead Crossing from an
affiliate of our manager. Under the promissory note, Lake Mead
Parent, LLC and Lake Mead Development, LLC can borrow up to
$10,500,000 at 8% interest. The mezzanine loan requires monthly
interest payments only. The loan matures on November 12, 2018. The
mezzanine loan has outstanding principal of approximately
$9,932,483, as of December 31, 2017. This loan has been fully
repaid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Lake
Mead Development, LLC received an interim loan from our manager in
the amount of $20,000. The interim loan carries interest of 7%
until the loan is called by our manager. After the loan is called,
the interest rate will increase to 8%. Our manager may call the
loan at any time and in its sole discretion. This loan has been
fully repaid.
|
Lake
Mead Crossing contains two unimproved pad sites, each being 30,000
square feet, for future development and lease-up opportunities. Our
company may use the unimproved pad sites for ground lease,
build-to-suit and/or sell opportunities.
2700 Ygnacio
Our
Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary 2700 Ygnacio Partners,
LLC, acquired an office building located at the corner of North Via
Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California, or 2700
Ygnacio, from an unaffiliated seller for $14,905,290, excluding
prorations. 2700 Ygnacio is a three-story, Class A office
building with approximately 108,000 rentable square feet.
On acquisition, it was 90.0% leased (currently 77.98% leased) to
numerous tenants under leases expiring on various dates between
2018 and 2022.
The
purchase of 2700 Ygnacio was financed using (i) a first mortgage
loan in the amount of $11,325,000, all of which was funded upon
acquisition, (ii) an interim loan from GK Development of
$2,305,000, and (iii) proceeds from this offering of
$1,750,000.
Corrollo Engineers
is the anchor tenant on the property, occupying 37,156 rentable
square feet, or 34.41% of the property, under a lease currently
scheduled to expire on October 31, 2019.
Proposed program for the renovation, improvement or development of
such property.
2700
Ygnacio is a three-story, Class A office building with
approximately 108,000 rentable square feet. The property was built
in 1985 and it includes 477 surface parking spaces reflecting an
overall parking ratio of 4.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net
rent area. On acquisition, it was 90.0% leased (77,98% leased, as
of June 30, 2018) to numerous tenants under leases expiring on
various dates between 2018 and 2022. We plan to lease the vacant
space, renew existing leases when they mature and currently, we
have no plans for the improvement of the property.
2700
Ygnacio is considered to be the premier office property in its
submarket, highlighted institutional-quality construction,
contiguous perimeter glass window lines that offer panoramic views
of Mount Diablo, abundant parking, and an impressive list of nearby
amenities. The prominent location and high quality of tenants
provides the stability of a “suburban core” investment
along with the opportunity to increase income and value over time
as rents in the submarket continue to rebound.
A
summary of key competitive conditions are as follows:
|
|
●
|
2700
Ygnacio is located in a region commonly referred to as North I-680
Corridor, one of the fastest growing regions in the San Francisco
Bay Area;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
2700
Ygnacio is easy to commute from San Francisco and
Oakland;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
2700
Ygnacio has (i) access to both executive and employee housing, (ii)
access to public schools that are highly regarded, (iii) access to
highly-educated workforce and (iv) easy access to mass
transit;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
2700
Ygnacio has a good parking ratio
|
Key Tenant Lease Terms
Below
is a summary of the key lease terms of tenants that currently
occupy at least 10% of our gross leasable area, or
GLA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
Footage
|
14,842
|
37,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
GLA
|
13.75%
|
34.42%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly Base
Rent
|
$28,497
|
$87,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent/Square
Foot
|
$23.04
|
$28.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
Expirations
|
|
|
Future Minimum Rent
|
2018 (remaining six
months)
|
$1,070,135
|
|
2019
|
1,915,969
|
|
2020
|
851,385
|
|
2021
|
599,014
|
|
2022
|
192,950
|
|
Thereafter
|
239,632
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$4,869,085
|
Schedule of Lease Expiration
The
following chart shows the number of leases expiring at 2700 Ygnacio
in each of the next six years and the square footage, and current
annual rent relating to such expiring leases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of Lease Expirations
|
5
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
Footage
|
909
|
48,524
|
1,341
|
22,273
|
6,340
|
3,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Rent
|
$21,816
|
$1,353,518
|
$36,475
|
$517,908
|
$152,757
|
$129,319
|
Components Upon Which Depreciation Are Taken
The
following chart provides the details of how tax depreciation is
calculated at 2700 Ygnacio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
$3,742,420
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building
|
$8,640,447
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
Improvements
|
$1,351,422
|
150%
Double Declining Balance
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal
Property
|
$1,171,001
|
200%
Double Declining Balance
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant
Improvements
|
$1,171,001
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$14,905,290
|
|
|
|
Realty Taxes
The
following chart provides the details of how taxes are assessed at
2700 Ygnacio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realty
Tax Rate
|
1.1009%
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
Realty Taxes
|
$188,604
|
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME
TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The
following discussion is a summary of certain material U.S. federal
income tax consequences relevant to the purchase, ownership and
disposition of the Bonds, but does not purport to be a complete
analysis of all potential tax consequences. The discussion is based
upon the Code, current, temporary and proposed U.S. Treasury
regulations issued under the Code, or collectively the Treasury
Regulations, the legislative history of the Code, IRS rulings,
pronouncements, interpretations and practices, and judicial
decisions now in effect, all of which are subject to change at any
time. Any such change may be applied retroactively in a manner that
could adversely affect a holder of the Bonds. This discussion does
not address all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences that
may be relevant to a holder in light of such holder’s
particular circumstances or to holders subject to special rules,
including, without limitation:
|
|
●
|
a
broker-dealer or a dealer in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
an S
corporation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a bank,
thrift or other financial institution;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
regulated investment company or a real estate investment
trust;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
an
insurance company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
tax-exempt organization;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
person subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the
Code;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
person holding the Bonds as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion,
integrated or other risk reduction or constructive sale
transaction;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
partnership or other pass-through entity;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
person deemed to sell the Bonds under the constructive sale
provisions of the Code;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a U.S.
person whose “functional currency” is not the U.S.
dollar; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a U.S.
expatriate or former long-term resident.
|
In
addition, this discussion is limited to persons that purchase the
Bonds in this offering for cash and that hold the Bonds as
“capital assets” within the meaning of
Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for
investment). This discussion does not address the effect of any
applicable state, local, non-U.S. or other tax laws, including gift
and estate tax laws.
As used
herein, “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of the
Bonds that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
●
|
an
individual who is a citizen or resident of the United
States;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a
corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S.
federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the
laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of
Columbia;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
an
estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax
regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a trust
that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a U.S. court and
the control of one or more U.S. persons that have the authority to
control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (2) has a valid
election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be
treated as a U.S. person.
|
If an
entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes holds the Bonds, the tax treatment of an owner of the
entity generally will depend upon the status of the particular
owner and the activities of the entity. If you are an owner of an
entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, you should consult your tax advisor regarding the tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the
Bonds.
We have
not sought and will not seek any rulings from the IRS with respect
to the matters discussed below. There can be no assurance that the
IRS will not take a different position concerning the tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership or disposition of the Bonds
or that any such position would not be sustained.
THIS SUMMARY OF MATERIAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE TAX ADVICE.
PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS REGARDING
THE APPLICATION OF THE TAX CONSIDERATIONS DISCUSSED BELOW TO THEIR
PARTICULAR SITUATIONS, POTENTIAL CHANGES IN APPLICABLE TAX LAWS AND
THE APPLICATION OF ANY STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN OR OTHER TAX LAWS,
INCLUDING GIFT AND ESTATE TAX LAWS, AND ANY TAX
TREATIES.
U.S. Holders
Interest
U.S.
Holder generally will be required to recognize and include in gross
income any stated interest as ordinary income at the time it is
paid or accrued on the Bonds in accordance with such holder’s
method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of the Bonds
A U.S.
Holder will recognize gain or loss on the sale, exchange,
redemption (including a partial redemption), retirement or other
taxable disposition of a Bond equal to the difference between the
sum of the cash and the fair market value of any property received
in exchange therefore (less a portion allocable to any accrued and
unpaid stated interest, which generally will be taxable as ordinary
income if not previously included in such holder’s income)
and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Bond. A U.S.
Holder’s adjusted tax basis in a Bond (or a portion thereof)
generally will be the U.S. Holder’s cost therefore decreased
by any payment on the Bond other than a payment of qualified stated
interest. This gain or loss will generally constitute capital gain
or loss. In the case of a non-corporate U.S. Holder, including an
individual, if the Bond has been held for more than one year, such
capital gain may be subject to reduced federal income tax rates.
The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain
limitations.
Medicare Tax
Certain
individuals, trusts and estates are subject to a Medicare tax of
3.8% on the lesser of (i) ”net investment income”,
or (ii) the excess of modified adjusted gross income over a
threshold amount. Net investment income generally includes interest
income and net gains from the disposition of Bonds, unless such
interest payments or net gains are derived in the ordinary course
of the conduct of a trade or business (other than a trade or
business that consists of certain passive or trading activities).
U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult with their tax advisors
regarding the possible implications of the Medicare tax on their
ownership and disposition of Bonds in light of their individual
circumstances.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
A U.S.
Holder may be subject to information reporting and backup
withholding when such holder receives interest and principal
payments on the Bonds or proceeds upon the sale or other
disposition of such Bonds (including a redemption or retirement of
the Bonds). Certain holders (including, among others, corporations
and certain tax-exempt organizations) generally are not subject to
information reporting or backup withholding. A U.S. Holder will be
subject to backup withholding if such holder is not otherwise
exempt and:
|
|
●
|
such
holder fails to furnish its taxpayer identification number, or TIN,
which, for an individual is ordinarily his or her social security
number;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the IRS
notifies the payor that such holder furnished an incorrect
TIN;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
in the
case of interest payments such holder is notified by the IRS of a
failure to properly report payments of interest or
dividends;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
in the
case of interest payments, such holder fails to certify, under
penalties of perjury, that such holder has furnished a correct TIN
and that the IRS has not notified such holder that it is subject to
backup withholding; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
such
holder does not otherwise establish an exemption from backup
withholding.
|
A U.S.
Holder should consult its tax advisor regarding its qualification
for an exemption from backup withholding and the procedures for
obtaining such an exemption, if applicable. Backup withholding is
not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed
as a credit against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax
liability or may be refunded, provided the required information is
furnished in a timely manner to the IRS.
Non-U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult their tax
advisors.
DESCRIPTION
OF BONDS
This
description sets forth certain terms of the Bonds that we are
offering pursuant to this Offering Circular. In this section, we
use capitalized words to signify terms that are specifically
defined in the Indenture, by and between us and UMB Bank, as
trustee, or the trustee. This section contains definitions of
certain capitalized terms that are used herein. We refer you to the
Indenture for a full disclosure of all such terms, as well as any
other capitalized terms used in this Offering Circular for which no
definition is provided.
Because
this section is a summary, it does not describe every aspect of the
Bonds or the Indenture. We urge you to read the Indenture because
that document and not this summary defines your rights as a
Bondholders. Please review a copy of the Indenture. The Indenture
is filed as an exhibit to the offering statement, of which this
offering circular is a part, at www.sec.gov. You may also obtain a
copy of the Indenture from us without charge. See
“Where
You Can Find More Information” for more information.
You may also review the Indenture at the trustee’s corporate
trust office at 1670 Broadway, Denver, Colorado 80202.
Ranking
The
Bonds are our direct, senior unsecured obligations
and:
|
|
●
|
rank
equally with each other and with all of our existing and future
unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness outstanding from time to
time;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
rank
senior to all of our future indebtedness that by its terms is
expressly subordinate to the Bonds;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
effectively
rank junior to any of our future secured indebtedness to the extent
of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
effectively
are structurally subordinated to all existing and future
indebtedness and other obligations of each of our subsidiaries,
including the claims of mortgage lenders holding secured
indebtedness, as to the specific property receiving each
lender’s mortgage and other secured
indebtedness.
|
Manner of Offering
The
offering is being made on a best-efforts basis through JCC
Advisors, LLC, our Managing Broker-Dealer, as well as other
selected dealers, or Selling Group Members. Our Managing
Broker-Dealer, nor any Selling Group Member, will be required to
purchase any of our Bonds.
Interest and Maturity
The
Bonds will mature on September 30, 2022 and will bear interest
at a fixed rate of 7% per annum. Interest on the Bonds will be paid
monthly on the 15th day of the month. The first interest payment on
a Bond will be paid on the 15th day of the month
following the issuance of such Bond.
THE
REQUIRED INTEREST PAYMENTS AND PRINCIPAL PAYMENT ARE NOT A GUARANTY
OF ANY RETURN TO YOU NOR ARE THEY A GUARANTY OF THE RETURN OF YOUR
INVESTED CAPITAL. While our company is required to make the
Interest Payments and Principal Payment as described in the
Indenture and above, we do not intend to establish a sinking fund
to fund such payments. Therefore, our ability to honor these
obligations will be subject to our ability to generate sufficient
cash flow or procure additional financing in order to fund those
payments. If we cannot generate sufficient cash flow or procure
additional financing to honor these obligations, we may be forced
to sell some or all of our company’s assets to fund the
payments, or we may not be able to fund the payments in their
entirety or at all. If we cannot fund the above payments,
Bondholders will have claims against us with respect to such
violation.
Optional Redemption
We may
redeem the Bonds in whole or in part, at any time. If we plan to
redeem our Bonds, we are required to give notice of redemption not
less than 30 days nor more than 60 days prior to any date of
redemption, the Redemption Date, to each Bondholder’s address
appearing in the securities register maintained by the trustee. In
the event we elect to redeem less than all of the Bonds, the
particular Bonds to be redeemed will be selected by the trustee by
such method as the trustee shall deem fair and
appropriate.
If the
Redemption Date is on or before September 30, 2019, our
company will pay the Bondholder an amount equal to 1.02 times the
Price to Public for each Bond being redeemed at that time. If the
Redemption Date is after September 30, 2019 but on or
before September 30, 2020, our company will pay the Bondholder
1.015 times to the Price to Public for each Bond redeemed at that
time. If the Redemption Date is after September 30, 2020 but
on or before September 30, 2021, our company will pay the
Bondholder 1.01 times to the Price to Public for each Bond redeemed
at that time. If the Redemption Date is after September 30,
2021, our company will pay the Bondholder the Price to Public for
each Bond redeemed at that time.
Redemption Upon Death or Disability
Our
manager has adopted the following policy regarding the repurchase
of Bonds upon the death or disability of a Bondholder. This policy
is not a feature of the Bonds themselves or contained in the
Indenture or any other agreement related to the Bonds.
In the
event of death or disability of a Bondholder, Bonds may be
presented to us for repurchase, or the Bond Repurchase. All or a
portion (consisting of at least 25%), of the
Bonds beneficially held by a Bondholder may be submitted to us
for repurchase at any time in accordance with the procedures
outlined below. At that time, the Company may, subject to the
conditions and limitations described below, repurchase the Bonds
presented for cash to the extent that we have sufficient funds
available. Neither we, GK Development, nor its affiliates will
receive any fees from us to complete any transactions under the
Bond Repurchase.
The
repurchase amount for the Bonds will be the amount that was paid
for the Bonds subject to the Bond Repurchase. GK Development may
also choose to amend, suspend or terminate the Bond Repurchase upon
30 days’ notice at any time.
In
order for a disability to be considered a “qualifying
disability,” (1) the Bondholder must receive a
determination of disability based upon a physical or mental
condition or impairment arising after the date the Bondholder first
acquired the Bonds subject to the Bond Repurchase, and
(2) such determination of disability must be made by the
governmental agency responsible for reviewing the disability
retirement benefits that the Bondholder could be eligible to
receive. The “applicable governmental agencies” are
limited to the following: (1) the Social Security Administration;
(2) the U.S. Office of Personnel Management; or (3) the
Veteran’s Benefits Administration.
Disability
determinations by governmental agencies for purposes other than
those listed above, including but not limited to worker’s
compensation insurance, administration or enforcement of the
Rehabilitation Act or Americans with Disabilities Act, or waiver of
insurance premiums, will not entitle a Bondholder to the Bond
Repurchase unless otherwise permitted by us. Repurchase requests
following an award by the applicable governmental agency of
disability benefits must be accompanied by: (1) the
investor’s initial application for disability benefits;
(2) a Social Security Administration Notice of Award, (3) a
U.S. Office of Personnel Management determination of
disability, (4) a Veteran’s Benefits Administration record of
disability-related discharge or (5) such other documentation issued
by the applicable governmental agency that we deem acceptable
demonstrating an award of the disability benefits.
The
following disabilities do not entitle a worker to Social Security
disability benefits:
|
|
●
|
disabilities
occurring after the legal retirement age;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
temporary
disabilities; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
disabilities
that do not render a worker incapable of performing substantial
gainful activity.
|
During
any calendar year, we will not repurchase more than 5% of the
weighted average number of Bonds outstanding during the prior
calendar year, or the 5% Limitation. Repurchase requests will be
reviewed based on the order they are received. The cash available
for the Bond Repurchase will be limited to the available cash flows
from operations or proceeds from sale of assets, or the Cash
Limitation.
Merger, Consolidation or Sale
We may
consolidate or merge with or into any other corporation, and we may
sell, lease or convey all or substantially all of our assets to any
corporation, provided that the successor entity, if other than
us:
|
|
●
|
is
organized and existing under the laws of the United States of
America or any United States, or U.S., state or the District of
Columbia; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
assumes
all of our obligations to perform and observe all of our
obligations under the Bonds and the Indenture;
|
and
provided further that no Event of Default (as defined below) shall
have occurred and be continuing.
Except
as described below under “- Certain Covenants - Offer
to Repurchase Upon a Change of Control Repurchase
Event,” the Indenture does not provide for any right
of acceleration in the event of a consolidation, merger, sale of
all or substantially all of the assets, recapitalization or change
in our stock ownership. In addition, the Indenture does not contain
any provision which would protect the Bondholders against a sudden
and dramatic decline in credit quality resulting from takeovers,
recapitalizations or similar restructurings.
Certain Covenants
Equity-Bond Ratio and Forced Sale Agreements
The
Bonds will be unsecured; however, our company will be required to
comply with the Equity-Bond Ratio covenant by owning real property
with aggregate equity value of at least 70% of the outstanding
principal of the Bonds, or the Equity-Bond Ratio. The equity
subject to any future Forced Sale Agreements will also be included
in the Equity-Bond Ratio. For properties owned, directly or
indirectly, by our company, the equity value for purposes of the
Equity-Bond Ratio will initially be the equity invested into the
applicable property. Each acquired property will be required to be
appraised, by an independent third party appraiser, annually during
the term of the Bonds, and, following any such appraisal, our
company’s equity value from a newly appraised property will
be adjusted to equal the appraised value of the property less the
outstanding indebtedness secured by such property and multiplied by
our company’s ownership interest in the applicable property,
in the event we acquire a partial interest in any
property.
As with
all non-payment defaults, our company will have a 120-day cure
period to cure any breach of the Equity-Bond Ratio covenant before
a default may be declared relative to such covenant. Any cure may
be made by either acquiring additional property or entering into
Additional Forced Sale Agreements.
As of
June 30, 2018, we have an Equity-Bond Ratio of 157.94%. The
Equity-Bond Ratio was calculated using (i) an apprised value of
Lake Mead Crossing of $46,365,000 with debt related to Lake Mead
Crossing totaling $34,488,766, (ii) an appraised value of 27000
Ygnacio of $18,000,000 with debt related to 2700 Ygnacio totaling
$10,990,990, and $11,948,000 of outstanding principal of the
Bonds.
Cash Coverage Ratio and Cash Flow Loans
While
any Bonds remain outstanding, the Indenture provides that our
company will maintain cash and cash equivalents, as defined by
GAAP, equal to at least 120% of our company’s Bond Service
Obligations for a period of three (3) months. Our company will be
required to make monthly reports of its cash and cash equivalents
to the trustee to ensure compliance with the Cash Coverage Ratio
covenant. If our company falls out of compliance with the Cash
Coverage Ratio covenant, it will have 120 days to cure such
non-compliance.
Our
company has entered into loan agreements with the Ridgmar Lender
and Lakeview Lenders, whereby the Cash Flow Lenders are obligated
to advance our company up to the entirety of the monthly
distributions to them from their indirect ownership interest in
Ridgmar and Lakeview Square, respectively, in order to enable our
company to meet the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant. Any such advances
will be represented by a promissory note, subordinate to the Bonds,
that will bear interest at the then in effect IRS imputed interest
rate and will have the same maturity date as the Bonds. We will be
required to represent to the Ridgmar Lender or the Lakeview Lenders
that we require such a loan in order to comply with the Cash
Coverage Ratio covenant in order to receive such a loan. Prior to
the Cash Flow Loans’ maturity date, our company may, but is
not required, to make payments on the Cash Flow Loans at its
discretion. At its discretion, our company may enter into
substantial similar arrangements with other affiliates of GK
Development in order to provide cash to our company to ensure
compliance with the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant; provided, that
the repayment of any loan from an affiliate of GK Development to
our company shall be subordinate to the Bonds. To date, our company
has not required any proceeds of the Cash Flow Loans to comply with
the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant.
Limitations of the Forced Sale Agreements and Cash Flow
Loans
We
expect that any equity in a property that is subject to a Forced
Sale Agreement may be financed using debt. We expect the terms of
such debt to provide that the borrower will be in default if the
ownership interest in the property, directly or indirectly, changes
without lender consent. We expect that under terms of such loans,
if the borrower is in default, the lender has the ability to
accelerate the debt and charge certain penalties payable by the
borrower. As a result, it may not be possible or it may be
prohibitively expensive to sell the equity subject to a Forced Sale
Agreement without lender consent. See “Risk Factors – Risks
Related to the Offering – The Effectiveness of our
trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced
Sale Agreement and call the loans of Lake Mead Crossing, 2700
Ygnacio and future acquired properties may be limited by covenants
and penalties in debt documents for senior mortgages secured by the
respective underlying properties” and
“Risk
Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Our
trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a
Forced Sale Agreement may be limited due to covenants contained in
the senior and mezzanine debt secured by those
properties” for more information.
The existing
Cash Flow Loan Agreements and any future Forced Sale
Agreements or Cash Flow Loan Agreements are not expected
to limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders, or any other
holder of equity subject to such an agreement, to sell their
equity, nor do those agreements preclude a sale of the underlying
real properties. In either circumstance, we would lose our rights
to Cash Flow Loans relative to the interest sold, and the value of
the interest sold would no longer be available to support the
Equity-Bond Ratio or the repayment of the Bonds in the event the
trustee exercised its rights under the Forced Sale Agreements. See
“Risk
Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Neither any
future Forced Sale Agreements nor any current or
future Cash Flow Loan Agreements limit the rights of the Cash
Flow Lenders to sell their indirect equity in Lakeview Square,
Ridgmar, or any equity subject to a future Forced Sale
Agreement or Cash Flow Loan to an unaffiliated third party, nor do
they preclude the sale of the underlying real
properties” for more information.
We may
enter into Forced Sale Agreements with affiliates. If we do, we
anticipate the terms of the Forced Sale Agreements to be
substantially similar to the expired Forced Sale
Agreements related to Ridgmar and Lakeview Square, which were
filed as exhibits to our Current Report on Form 1-U, filed with the
SEC on October 6, 2016. As a result, the risks associated with the
Forced Sale Agreements are expected to include, but not be limited
to (i) the inability to effectively sell the affected equity due to
restrictions contained in the underlying senior and
mezzanine debt documents, (ii) the ability of the property
owner to sell the property without the consent of the
trustee, and (iii) the ability of the holder of the affected
equity to sell the affected equity without the consent of the
trustee.
Offer to Repurchase Upon a Change of Control Repurchase
Event
“Change of Control Repurchase
Event” means (A) the acquisition by any person,
including any syndicate or group deemed to be a
“person” under Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange
Act, of beneficial ownership, directly or indirectly, through a
purchase, merger or other acquisition transaction or series of
purchases, mergers or other acquisition transactions of the
membership units entitling that person to exercise more than 50% of
the total voting power of all the membership units entitled to vote
in meetings of our company (except that such person will be deemed
to have beneficial ownership of all securities that such person has
the right to acquire, whether such right is currently exercisable
or is exercisable only upon the occurrence of a subsequent
condition); and (B) following the closing of any transaction
referred to in subsection (A), neither we nor the acquiring or
surviving entity has a class of common securities (or American
Depositary Receipts representing such securities) listed on the New
York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, the NYSE Amex Equities, or the
NYSE Amex, or the Nasdaq Stock Market, or listed or quoted on an
exchange or quotation system that is a successor to the NYSE, the
NYSE Amex or the Nasdaq Stock Market.
If a
Change of Control Repurchase Event occurs, unless we have exercised
our option to redeem the Bonds as described under
“-
Optional Redemption,” we will make an offer to each
Bondholder to repurchase all or any part of that Bondholder’s
Bonds at a repurchase price equal to 1.02 times the Price to Public
if on or before September 30, 2019, 1.015 times the Price to Public
if such event occurs after September 30, 2019 but on or before
the September 30, 2020, 1.01 times the Price to Public if such
event occurs after September 30, 2020 but on or before September
30, 2021, and at the Price to Public if such event occurs after
September 30, 2021, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but
not including the repurchase date.
Reports
We will
furnish the following reports to each Bondholder:
Reporting Requirements under Tier II
of Regulation A. We are required to comply with certain
ongoing disclosure requirements under Rule 257 of Regulation A. We
are required to file: an annual report with the SEC on Form 1-K; a
semi-annual report with the SEC on Form 1-SA; current reports with
the SEC on Form 1-U; and a notice under cover of Form 1-Z. The
necessity to file current reports will be triggered by certain
corporate events, similar to the ongoing reporting obligation faced
by issuers under the Exchange Act, however the requirement to file
a Form 1-U is expected to be triggered by significantly fewer
corporate events than that of the Form 8-K. Parts I & II of
Form 1-Z will be filed by us if and when we decide to and are no
longer obligated to file and provide annual reports pursuant to the
requirements of Regulation A.
Annual Reports. As soon as
practicable, but in no event later than one hundred twenty (120)
days after the close of our fiscal year, ending December 31st, our
manager will cause to be mailed or made available, by any
reasonable means, to each Bondholder as of a date selected by our
manager, an annual report containing financial statements of our
company for such fiscal year, presented in accordance with GAAP,
including a balance sheet and statements of operations, Company
equity and cash flows, with such statements having been audited by
an accountant selected by our manager. Our manager shall be deemed
to have made a report available to each Bondholder as required if
it has either (i) filed such report with the SEC via its Electronic
Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) system and such
report is publicly available on such system or (ii) made such
report available on any website maintained by our company and
available for viewing by the Bondholders.
Insurance
We
will, and will cause each of our subsidiaries to, keep all of its
insurable property insured against loss or damage at least equal to
their then full insurable value with insurers of recognized
responsibility and having an A.M Best policy holder’s rating
of not less than A-V.
Payment of Taxes and Other Claims
We will
pay or discharge or cause to be paid or discharged, before the same
shall become delinquent: (i) all taxes, assessments and
governmental charges levied or imposed upon us or any subsidiary or
upon the income, profits or property of us or any subsidiary; and
(ii) all lawful claims for labor, materials and supplies
which, if unpaid, might by law become a lien upon the property of
us or any subsidiary; provided, however, that we shall not be
required to pay or discharge or cause to be paid or discharged any
such tax, assessment, charge or claim whose amount, applicability
or validity is being contested in good faith by appropriate
proceedings or for which we have set apart and maintain an adequate
reserve.
There
is no public market for the Bonds. We may apply for quotation
of the Bonds on an alternative trading system or over the
counter market beginning after the final closing of this
offering. However, even if the Bonds are listed or quoted, no
assurance can be given as to (1) the likelihood that an active
market for the Bonds will develop, (2) the liquidity of any such
market, (3) the ability of Bondholders to sell the Bonds or (4) the
prices that Bondholders may obtain for any of the Bonds. No
prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales
of the Bonds, or the availability of the Bonds for future sale,
will have on the market price prevailing from time to time. Sales
of substantial amounts of the Bonds, or the perception that such
sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices of
the Bonds. See “Risk
Factors — Investment
Risks.”
Event of Default
The
following are Events of Default under the Indenture with respect to
the Bonds:
|
|
●
|
default
in the payment of any interest on the Bonds when due and payable,
which continues for thirty (30) days, a Cure Period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
default
in the payment of any principal of or premium on the Bonds when
due, which continues for thirty (30) days, a Cure
Period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
default
in the performance of any other obligation or covenant contained in
the Indenture or in this Offering Circular for the benefit of the
Bonds, which continues for one hundred twenty (120) days after
written notice, a Cure Period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
specified
events in bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of us;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
any
final and non-appealable judgment or order for the payment of money
in excess of $25,000,000 singly, or in the aggregate for all such
final judgments or orders against all such Persons shall be
rendered against us or any Significant Subsidiary and shall not be
paid or discharged.
|
Book-entry and
other indirect Bondholders should consult their banks or brokers
for information on how to give notice or direction to or make a
request of the trustee and how to declare or rescind an
acceleration of maturity.
Annually, within
120 days following December 31st while the Bonds are
outstanding, we will furnish to the trustee a written statement of
certain of our officers certifying that to their knowledge we are
in compliance with the Indenture, or else specifying any Default
and the nature and status thereof. We will also deliver to the
trustee a written notification of any uncured Default within 30
days after we become aware of such uncured Default.
Remedies if an Event of Default Occurs
Subject
to any respective Cure Period, if an Event of Default occurs and is
continuing, the trustee or the Bondholders of not less than a
majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds may declare the
principal thereof, premium, if any, and all unpaid interest thereon
to be due and payable immediately. In such event, the trustee will
have the right force us to sell any real property held by us or any
subsidiary of ours that we have the unilateral right to cause it to
sell its assets. We will be required to contribute the proceeds of
any such sale to the repayment of the Bonds. With respect to
subsidiaries for which we do not have the unilateral right to sell
their assets (for example, if we acquire a property in a joint
venture), the trustee has the right to force us to sell our equity
in such subsidiary in order to repay the Bonds.
If the
sale of our assets is insufficient to repay all obligations under
the Bonds, then the trustee will also have the right to force the
sale of any equity interest or property then subject to a Forced
Sale Agreement.
Limitations of the Forced Sale Agreements
We
expect that any equity in a property that is subject to a Forced
Sale Agreement may be financed using debt. We expect the terms of
such debt to provide that the borrower will be in default if the
ownership interest in the property, directly or indirectly, changes
without lender consent. We expect that under terms of such loans,
if the borrower is in default, the lender has the ability to
accelerate the debt and charge certain penalties payable by the
borrower. As a result, it may not be possible or it may be
prohibitively expensive to sell the equity subject to a Forced Sale
Agreement without lender consent. See “Risk Factors – Risks
Related to the Offering – The Effectiveness of our
trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced
Sale Agreement and call the loans of Lake Mead Crossing, 2700
Ygnacio and future acquired properties may be limited by covenants
and penalties in debt documents for senior mortgages secured by the
respective underlying properties” and
“Risk
Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Our
trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a
Forced Sale Agreement may be limited due to covenants contained in
the senior and mezzanine debt secured by those
properties” for more information.
The
existing Cash Flow Loan Agreements and any future Forced Sale
Agreements or Cash Flow Loan Agreements are not expected
to limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders, or any other
holder of equity subject to such an agreement, to sell their
equity, nor do those agreements preclude a sale of the underlying
real properties. In either circumstance, we would lose our rights
to Cash Flow Loans relative to the interest sold, and the value of
the interest sold would no longer be available to support the
Equity-Bond Ratio or the repayment of the Bonds in the event the
trustee exercised its rights under the Forced Sale Agreements. See
“Risk
Factors – Risks Related to the Offering –
Neither any future Forced Sale Agreements nor any
current or future Cash Flow Loan Agreements limit the rights
of the Cash Flow Lenders to sell their indirect equity in Lakeview
Square, Ridgmar, or any equity subject to a future Forced Sale
Agreement or Cash Flow Loan to an unaffiliated third party, nor do
they preclude the sale of the underlying real
properties” for more information.
We may
enter into Forced Sale Agreements with affiliates. If we do, we
anticipate the terms of the Forced Sale Agreements to be
substantially similar to the expired Forced Sale Agreements related
to Ridgmar and Lakeview Square, which were filed as exhibits to our
Current Report on Form 1-U, filed with the SEC on October 6, 2016.
As a result, the risks associated with the Forced Sale Agreements
are expected to include, but not be limited to (i) the inability to
effectively sell the affected equity due to restrictions contained
in the underlying senior and mezzanine debt documents, (ii)
the ability of the property owner to sell the property without
the consent of the trustee, and (iii) the ability of the
holder of the affected equity to sell the affected equity without
the consent of the trustee.
At any
time after the trustee or the Bondholders have accelerated the
repayment of the principal, premium, if any, and all unpaid
interest on the Bonds, but before the trustee has obtained a
judgment or decree for payment of money due, the Bondholders of a
majority in aggregate principal amount of outstanding Bonds may
rescind and annul that acceleration and its consequences, provided
that all payments and/or deliveries due, other than those due as a
result of acceleration, have been made and all Events of Default
have been remedied or waived.
The
Bondholders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding
Bonds may waive any default with respect to that series, except a
default:
|
|
●
|
in the
payment of any amounts due and payable or deliverable under the
Bonds; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
in an
obligation contained in, or a provision of, the Indenture which
cannot be modified under the terms of the Indenture without the
consent of each Bondholder
|
The
Bondholders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding
Bonds may direct the time, method and place of conducting any
proceeding for any remedy available to the trustee or exercising
any trust or power conferred on the trustee with respect to the
Bonds, provided that (i) such direction is not in conflict
with any rule of law or the Indenture, (ii) the trustee may
take any other action deemed proper by the trustee that is not
inconsistent with such direction and (iii) the trustee need
not take any action that might involve it in personal liability or
be unduly prejudicial to the Bondholders not joining therein.
Subject to the provisions of the Indenture relating to the duties
of the trustee, before proceeding to exercise any right or power
under the Indenture at the direction of the Bondholders, the
trustee is entitled to receive from those Bondholders security or
indemnity satisfactory to the trustee against the costs, expenses
and liabilities which it might incur in complying with any
direction.
A
Bondholder has the right to institute a proceeding with respect to
the Indenture or for any remedy under the Indenture,
if:
|
|
●
|
that
Bondholder previously gives to the trustee written notice of a
continuing Event of Default in excess of any Cure
Period,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
Bondholders of not less than a majority in principal amount of the
outstanding bonds have made written request;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
such
Bondholder or Bondholders have offered to indemnify the trustee
against the costs, expenses and liabilities incurred in connection
with such request;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
trustee has not received from the Bondholders of a majority in
principal amount of the outstanding Bonds a direction inconsistent
with the request (it being understood and intended that no one or
more of such Bondholders shall have any right in any manner
whatever by virtue of, or by availing of, any provision of the
Indenture to affect, disturb or prejudice the rights of any other
of such Bondholders, or to obtain or to seek to obtain priority or
preference over any other of such Bondholders or to enforce any
rights under the Indenture, except in the manner herein provided
and for equal and ratable benefit of all Bondholders);
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
trustee fails to institute the proceeding within 60
days.
|
However, the
Bondholder has the right, which is absolute and unconditional, to
receive payment of the principal of and interest on such Bond on
the respective due dates (or, in the case of redemption, on the
Redemption Date) and to institute suit for the enforcement of any
such payment and such rights shall not be impaired without the
consent of such Bondholder.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There
are currently no legal proceedings involving our
company.
On
December 23, 2015, the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois
entered a consent order censuring GK Development, Inc., our
manager, and Garo Kholamian, the President, sole director and sole
shareholder of our manager for violation of the Illinois Securities
Act related to certain previous private offerings. The Illinois
Secretary of State stated in the order that it is not intended to
trigger or otherwise result in disqualification from the usage of
Regulation A or Regulation D. The Illinois Secretary of State
alleged failures of risk disclosure in those offerings based upon
the actual performance of those programs and to disclose certain
prior performance information considered required by the Illinois
Secretary of State. Our manager and Mr. Kholamian disputed these
allegations but, nevertheless, on December 22, 2015 stipulated to
the entry of the consent order to settle this matter without any
admission of the veracity of the alleged facts or conclusions of
law of the Illinois Secretary of State.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners (5% or
more)
|
Title of Class
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
A
|
|
Garo
Kholamian(1)(2)
|
|
67.81%
Membership Interest
|
|
67.81%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
A
|
|
Nancy
Kholamian(2)(3)
|
|
12.61%
Membership Interest
|
|
12.61%
|
Security Ownership of Management
|
Title of Class
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
A
|
|
Management(2)
|
|
84.19%
Membership Interest
|
|
84.19%
|
____________
|
(1)
|
Held by
Garo Kholamian individually and through the Garo Kholamian
Revocable Trust, and the Kholamian Family Insurance
Trust.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Address
is: 257 East Main Street, Suite 200, Barrington, IL
60010.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Held by
Nancy Kholamian individually and through the Nancy Kholamian
Revocable Trust.
|
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The
following table sets forth information on the directors and
executive officers of GK Development. Our company is managed by GK
Development, its sole manager. Consequently, our company does not
have its own separate directors or executive officers.
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position with our Company
|
|
Director/Officer Since
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garo
Kholamian
|
|
59
|
|
President
and Sole Director
|
|
1995
|
|
Sherry
Mast
|
|
50
|
|
Principal
- Leasing
|
|
1997
|
|
Gregory
C. Kveton
|
|
61
|
|
Principal
- Development
|
|
2002
|
|
Susan
Dewar
|
|
59
|
|
Senior
Vice President - Acquisitions
|
|
2004
|
|
Matt
Leiter
|
|
45
|
|
Senior
Vice President - Equity Markets
|
|
2011
|
|
Melissa
Pielet
|
|
52
|
|
Principal
- Equity Markets
|
|
2013
|
|
Colin Hartzell
|
|
37
|
|
Vice President – Financial Planning and Control
|
|
2018
|
Executive Officers
Set
forth below is biographical information for GK Development’s
executive officers.
Garo Kholamian, age 59, is the President, sole
Director and sole shareholder of GK Development. Since the
formation of the GK Development in 1995, Mr. Kholamian and his
affiliates have acquired and developed over 120 million square feet
of commercial property including apartments, office and commercial
rental. Prior to forming GK Development, Mr. Kholamian was Senior
Vice President of Development for Homart Development Co., the real
estate development arm of Sears Roebuck, specializing in regional
shopping malls, power centers and office buildings. At Homart, Mr.
Kholamian was responsible for site selection, negotiation and
project development and management of Homart’s community
shopping centers, including over 2.2 million square feet of
commercial rental space in the Midwest and Florida. Before managing
the development of these centers, Mr. Kholamian assisted in the
development of 1.5 million square feet of regional malls and 1.1
million square feet of office space throughout the U.S. for Homart.
Mr. Kholamian received his Master’s Degree in Business
Management from Loyola University of Chicago in 1985 and his
Bachelor’s Degree in Architecture from the Illinois Institute
of Technology in 1981. He is a member of the International Council
of Shopping Centers and a licensed real estate broker in
Illinois.
Sherry Mast, age 50, is the Principal - Leasing at
GK Development. Ms. Mast joined GK Development in 1997 and, prior
to taking over leasing, established property management and
financial systems for GK Development. Ms. Mast is responsible for
leasing of the company’s entire portfolio and manages outside
broker relationships, as well as day-to-day leasing activity. Prior
to joining GK Development, Ms. Mast was Marketing Manager for
Karp’s, a nationally recognized bakery supply company. There
she was responsible for new product development, creating bakery
supply solutions for national retailers. From joining that company
in 1992, Ms. Mast was involved in the creation of new products and
worked closely with national clients, including Starbucks Coffee,
Wal-Mart, Dominick’s Finer Foods and American Superstores.
Prior to joining Karp’s, Ms. Mast was Quality Assurance
Associate for Hyatt Hotel Corporation from 1989 through 1992. There
she assisted in improving customer relations and maintaining
Hyatt’s industry-leading service standards. Ms. Mast received
her Bachelor’s Degree in Corporate Communications from
Northern Illinois University. She is a member of the International
Council of Shopping Centers and is a registered real estate
salesperson in Illinois.
Gregory C. Kveton, age 61, is the
Principal - Development at GK Development. He joined GK Development
in 2002 to spearhead the company’s ground-up development team
by identifying opportunities in emerging growth markets. He also
directs new development and ongoing capital construction. During
his tenure, GK Development has specialized in projects that deliver
steady, increasing value for GK Development’s investors,
tenants and community. Previously, Greg was Senior Vice President -
Operations with fiscal and operation responsibility for GK
Development’s portfolio. Before he joined GK Development, he
was Vice President of Asset Management in the commercial rental
group of Lend Lease Real Estate Investments, where he was
responsible for project oversight for power center development in
the western United States. At Homart Development Company, the real
estate development arm of Sears Roebuck, Greg was National Director
of the Community Centers group, where he oversaw asset and property
management for the company’s power and community centers
portfolio. Greg graduated from Iowa State University with a
Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration, and holds
both the Certified Shopping Center Manager and Certified Retail
Property Executive designations from the International Council of
Shopping Centers (ICSC).
Susan Dewar, age 59, is the Senior Vice
President - Acquisitions at GK Development. Susan joined GK
Development in 2004, enriching the team with her extensive
background in commercial, office and industrial real estate. Susan
is responsible for reviewing and assessing each potential
acquisition for GK Development. She has been actively involved in
the acquisition and financing of several regional malls, including
a portfolio of four malls totaling more than 1.74 million square
feet. She was previously involved in obtaining financing for
several of GK Development’s properties, and maintains a
presence in both the local and national banking communities.
Previously, Susan was Vice President of Real Estate for the Elmer
J. Krauss Organization, at the time, the largest industrial real
estate owner in the State of Florida. While with Krauss, she
oversaw more than 30 acquisition/disposition transactions in a
3-year period, including all due diligence and financing. In
addition, she was responsible for all property and asset management
for the entire portfolio. Susan attended the University of Houston,
focusing on Business and Real Estate, and is a licensed real estate
broker in the State of Florida. She is a member of the
International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC), a Certified
Property Manager, and a 20-year member of the Institute of Real
Estate Management.
Matt Leiter, age 45, is the Senior Vice
President - Equity Markets at GK Development. Matt manages legacy
investments and its investors. Matt also structures new investment
products for distribution to Broker Dealers, Family Offices, and
Institutional investors. Matt manages and monitors the financial
performance of the company’s four equity funds and seven
single-asset real estate investment offerings. He has also selected
and managed GK’s National Sales, Key Accounts and Wholesaling
team, leading them to more than $50 million raised in less than
two-years, allowing for the purchase or recapitalization of more
than $150 million of real estate assets. Before joining GK
Development, he was General Manager at the Leiter Group, a Florida
real estate development firm with a focus on mixed-use multi-family
public/private projects. There he led in managing and developing
projects with a combined value of over $300 million. He also has
experience as the Chief Operating Officer of a European software
company and as a sales manager at Caterpillar, Inc., where he
worked for six years. Matt received his Bachelor of Science degree
from the University of Illinois at Champaign - Urbana and his
Masters of Business Administration from the University of
Chicago.
Melissa Pielet, age 52, is the Principal
- Finance at GK Development. Melissa arranges financing for all of
GK Development’s acquisitions and developments. She procures
first mortgage debt, mezzanine debt and preferred equity for GK
Development’s portfolio. This includes construction loans,
bridge loans and permanent loans. She is also responsible for
ongoing communication with lenders on all GK-owned assets. Before
joining the GK Development team, Melissa was a Principal and
Executive Vice President of finance for 26 years with HSA
Commercial. There she was responsible for financing the development
and acquisition of over 67 million square feet of real estate with
a market value of over $2.5 billion. This included industrial,
commercial, office, medical office, senior living, hotels and
vacant land. During her tenure at HSA, Melissa oversaw
communication with lenders for all ongoing needs related to HSA
Commercial’s 16 million square feet of owned assets,
including negotiation various loan restructures to benefit
ownership. She also arranged financing for various third party
borrowers, including all of GK Development’s acquisitions and
developments. Melissa attended the University of Wisconsin,
studying real estate and marketing. She is a member of the
International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) and is licensed as
a real estate broker in the state of Illinois.
Colin
Hartzell, age 37, is the Vice
President of Financial Planning and Control of our Manager. Colin
joined our Manager in June 2018 bringing over 14 years of
experience including corporate finance leadership and accounting
experience in the real estate industry. Prior to joining our
Manager, Colin was with GGP, Inc. since September 2009, a publicly
traded retail real estate company based in Chicago, Illinois, most
recently serving as Vice President, Financial Planning and
Analysis. Colin reported to senior management on analysis of
current and past trends in key performance indicators, reviewed key
financial and operational metrics and forecasts, and liaised with
senior leadership, stakeholders, and financial teams to ensure the
company’s support structure is driving the business forward
with minimal expenditures. Prior to GGP, Inc., Colin was with Huron
Consulting Group (May 2007 – November 2008), Equity Office
Properties (March 2005 – May 2007), and Deloitte (February
2004 – March 2005). Colin received a Bachelor of Science in
Accounting from Valparaiso.
Directors
Garo
Kholamian is the sole shareholder and director of GK
Development.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Our
company does not have executives. It is operated by a sole manager,
GK Development. We will not reimburse our manager for any portion
of the salaries and benefits to be paid to its executive officers
named in “Directors and Executive
Officers.” See “Compensation of our manager
and its Affiliates” for a list of fees payable to GK
Development and/or its affiliates.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Forced Sale Agreements
In
order to comply with the Equity-Bond Ratio, our company may, with
the trustee’s reasonable approval, enter into Forced Sale
Agreements with affiliates of GK Development.
We
expect that any equity in a property that is subject to a Forced
Sale Agreement may be financed using debt. We expect the terms of
such debt to provide that the borrower will be in default if the
ownership interest in the property, directly or indirectly, changes
without lender consent. We expect that under terms of such loans,
if the borrower is in default, the lender has the ability to
accelerate the debt and charge certain penalties payable by the
borrower. As a result, it may not be possible or it may be
prohibitively expensive to sell the equity subject to a Forced Sale
Agreement without lender consent. See “Risk Factors – Risks
Related to the Offering – The Effectiveness of our
trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a Forced
Sale Agreement and call the loans of Lake Mead Crossing, 2700
Ygnacio and future acquired properties may be limited by covenants
and penalties in debt documents for senior mortgages secured by the
respective underlying properties” and
“Risk
Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Our
trustee’s remedy to force a sale of equity subject to a
Forced Sale Agreement may be limited due to covenants contained in
the senior and mezzanine debt secured by those
properties” for more information.
The
existing Cash Flow Loan Agreements and any future Forced Sale
Agreements or Cash Flow Loan Agreements are not expected
to limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders, or any other
holder of equity subject to such an agreement, to sell their
equity, nor do those agreements preclude a sale of the underlying
real properties. In either circumstance, we would lose our rights
to Cash Flow Loans relative to the interest sold, and the value of
the interest sold would no longer be available to support the
Equity-Bond Ratio or the repayment of the Bonds in the event the
trustee exercised its rights under the Forced Sale Agreements. See
“Risk
Factors – Risks Related to the Offering – Neither any
future Forced Sale Agreements nor any current or future Cash Flow
Loan Agreements limit the rights of the Cash Flow Lenders to sell
their indirect equity in Lakeview Square, Ridgmar, or any equity
subject to a future Forced Sale Agreement or Cash Flow Loan to an
unaffiliated third party, nor do they preclude the sale of the
underlying real properties” for more
information.
We may
enter into Forced Sale Agreements with affiliates. If we do, we
anticipate the terms of the Forced Sale Agreements to be
substantially similar to the expired Forced Sale
Agreements related to Ridgmar and Lakeview Square, which were
filed as exhibits to our Current Report on Form 1-U, filed with the
SEC on October 6, 2016. As a result, the risks associated with the
Forced Sale Agreements are expected to include, but not be limited
to (i) the inability to effectively sell the affected equity due to
restrictions contained in the underlying senior and
mezzanine debt documents, (ii) the ability of the property
owner to sell the property without the consent of the
trustee, and (iii) the ability of the holder of the affected
equity to sell the affected equity without the consent of the
trustee.
Cash Flow Loans
Our
company has entered into loan agreements with the Lakeview Lenders
and the Ridgmar Lender, whereby the Cash Flow Lenders are obligated
to advance our company up to the entirety of the monthly cash flow
to them from their indirect ownership interest in Lakeview Square
or Ridgmar, respectively, in order to enable our company to meet
the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant. Any such advances will be
represented by a promissory note, subordinate to the Bonds, that
will bear interest at the then in effect IRS impute interest rate
and will have the same maturity date as the Bonds. We will be
required to represent to the Cash Flow Lenders that we require such
a loan in order to comply with the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant in
order to receive such a loan. The source of the Cash Flow Loans
will be the distributions to the Cash Flow Lenders resulting in
their indirect ownership interest in the underlying real property.
Prior to the Cash Flow Loans’ maturity date, our company may,
but is not required, to make payments on the Cash Flow Loans at its
discretion. At its discretion, our company may enter into
substantial similar arrangements with other affiliates of GK
Development in order to provide cash to our company to ensure
compliance with the Cash Coverage Ratio covenant; provided, that
the repayment of any loan from an affiliate of GK Development to
our company shall be subordinate to the Bonds.
The
Cash Flow Loan Agreements do not limit the rights of the holders
of such equity to sell their equity, nor do those
agreements preclude a sale of the underlying real properties. If
this were to occur, we would lose our rights to the cash flow loans
relative to the interest sold. See “Risk Factors – Risks
Related to the Offering – Neither the Forced Sale
Agreements nor the Cash Flow Loan Agreements limit the rights of
the Cash Flow Lenders to sell their indirect equity in Lakeview
Square, Ridgmar, or any other equity subject to a Forced Sale
Agreement or a Cash Flow Loan to an unaffiliated third party, nor
do they preclude the sale of the underlying real
properties.” for more information.
Mezzanine Debt
Lake
Mead Parent, LLC, the owner of Lake Mead Partners, LLC and the
wholly-owned subsidiary of our company, and Lake Mead Development,
LLC received mezzanine debt to purchase Lake Mead Crossing from an
affiliate of our manager. Under the promissory note, Lake Mead
Parent, LLC and Lake Mead Development, LLC can borrow up to
$10,500,000 at 8% interest. The mezzanine loan requires monthly
interest payments only. The loan matures on November 12, 2018. The
mezzanine loan had an outstanding principal of approximately
$6,417,483 as of the date of this offering circular. We believe the
terms of the current loan are, and any future loans from an
affiliate of our manager will be, fair and at market rates for such
loans. However, we cannot assure you that a third party
unaffiliated with GK Development would not be willing to provide
current loan financing on better terms.
Interim Debt
Lake
Mead Partners, LLC received an interim loan from our manager in the
amount of $2,608,100 in connection with our acquisition of Lake
Mead Crossing. The interim loan carried interest of 7% until called
by our manager. This loan has been repaid.
Lake
Mead Development, LLC received an interim loan from our manager in
the amount of $20,000 in connection with our acquisition of Lake
Mead Crossing. The interim loan carried interest of 7% until called
by our manager. This loan has been repaid.
2700
Ygnacio Partners, LLC received an interim loan from our manager in
the amount of $2,305,000 in connection with our acquisition of 2700
Ygnacio. The interim loan carried interest of 7%. This loan has
been repaid.
See
“Selection, Retention and
Custody of Company’s Investments” and
“Policies
in Respect to Certain Transactions” for more
information on related party transactions.
SELECTION, RETENTION AND CUSTODY OF COMPANY’S
INVESTMENTS
GK
Development, our company’s manager, or its affiliates will be
responsible for all aspects of the management of our
company’s assets. Through this management, GK Development or
its affiliates will be entitled to the fees enumerated
below:
Acquisition Fees. GK Development will be
entitled to 2% of the purchase price of each property purchased
from non-affiliated, third party sellers for identifying,
reviewing, evaluating, investing in and the purchase of real
property acquisitions. These acquisition fees are payable by our
company regardless of whether the property ever generates positive
cash flow.
Property Management Services Fee. Each
property owned by our company will be managed by a property
manager, which may be GK Development or an affiliate of GK
Development. For its services, the property manager will be paid
property management fees, leasing compensation and other
compensation, provided that property management fees for any
property may not exceed 5% of annual gross revenues from that
property. The property management fees will be paid in arrears on a
monthly basis. The property management fees are payable by our
company regardless of whether the property ever generates positive
cash flow.
Disposition Fees. GK Development will
receive 2% of the gross sale price from the disposition of each
property by our company. These disposition fees are payable by our
company regardless of whether the investment is sold at a gain or a
loss.
Financing Fees. GK Development will be
entitled to 2% of the principal amount of any financing in
conjunction with the purchase or refinance of an asset. These
financing fees are payable by our company regardless of whether the
asset generates positive cash flow.
Other Fees. GK Development may be
entitled to certain additional, reasonable fees in association with
other activities imperative to the operations of our company.
Such activities include, but are not limited to, property leasing,
property development, and loan guarantees. GK Development will
endeavor to determine such fees based upon benchmark market
rates.
POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN
TRANSACTIONS
Conflicts Generally
GK
Development has not established any formal procedures to resolve
the conflicts of interest discussed below. Bondholders, therefore,
will be dependent on the good faith of the respective parties to
resolve conflicts equitably. Although GK Development will attempt
to monitor these conflicts, it will be extremely difficult if not
impossible to assure that these conflicts do not arise, and may, in
certain circumstances, result in adverse consequences to our
company.
Specific Conflicts Inherent in our Company
As
described below, certain conflicts of interest are inherent in an
investment in our company. By investing in this offering, each
Bondholder will be deemed to have consented to these conflicts and
to have agreed not to assert any claim that any such conflicts
violate any duty owed by GK Development, our manager, or its
affiliates to the Bondholders, except to the extent that such
conflict results in liability under the Securities Act. These
conflicts include those inherent to the business relationship
between our company and GK Development described in the preceding
section. See “Selection,
Retention and Custody of Company’s Investments”
and “Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions” for more
information.
Property Purchased from GK Development and
their Affiliates. Our company may acquire properties, or an
interest therein, from GK Development, and/or its affiliates. These
properties, or interests therein, may be acquired in exchange for
any combination of cash, debt and/or equity in our company. GK
Development, or their affiliates, may derive a profit as a result
of these acquisition transactions.
Other Activities. GK Development and its
shareholder, director, officers and employees are not required to
devote their full time to the business of our company, and GK
Development and its shareholder, director, officers and employees
may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time
between our company and other activities of GK Development.
However, GK Development is required to spend such time as is
reasonably needed for the operations of our company and as is
consistent with the due care that a fiduciary would use in the
conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims. GK
Development believes that it has sufficient staff to be fully
capable of discharging its responsibilities to our company. GK
Development and its respective affiliates may have other business
interests or may engage in other business ventures of any nature or
description whatsoever, whether presently existing or created
later, and whether or not competitive with the business of our
company or its affiliates. GK Development will have no right
(including without limitation a right of first opportunity, first
offer or first refusal with respect to any real estate investment
presented to GK Development or any of their respective affiliates)
by virtue of its participation in our company in or to such
ventures or activities or to the income or profits derived from
them. To the extent GK Development or its affiliates already have
an ownership interest in an existing property in a market in which
our company intends to acquire property, such other property may be
in competition with our company’s investment for prospective
tenants. Further, GK Development will have sole discretion to
determine which among its affiliate’s sponsored programs
should purchase any particular property or make any other
investment, or enter into a joint venture for the acquisition and
operation of specific properties.
Co-Investments. GK Development has the
right, in its sole discretion, to determine whether it or any of
its affiliates may co-invest with our company with respect to any
particular property investment.
Loans. Our company purchased Lake Mead
Crossing by utilizing debt financing directly from our manager and
from an affiliate of our manager. See “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions” for more information. We are not
restricted from obtaining future debt financing from our manager or
an affiliate of our manager. While we believe these loans are, and
any future loans will be, fair and at market rates consistent with
such loans, the terms of any such financing were not, and will not
be, negotiated at arm’s length.
No Separate Representation of Bondholders by
Counsel to our Company. Legal counsel for our company does
not represent the Bondholders in connection with the organization
or business of our company or this offering, and such counsel
disclaims any fiduciary or attorney-client relationship with the
Bondholders. Prospective investors should obtain the advice of
their own legal counsel regarding legal matters.
COMPENSATION OF OUR MANAGER AND ITS AFFILIATES
The
following is a description of compensation that may be received by
GK Development and its affiliates from our company or in connection
with the proceeds of this offering. These compensation arrangements
have been established by GK Development and its affiliates and are
not the result of arm’s-length negotiations. Services for
which our company engages GK Development or its affiliates and
which are not described below will be compensated at the market
rate. Fees payable to GK Development or its affiliates in excess of
the rate set forth in this section entitled “Compensation of our Manager
and Its Affiliates” will require the consent of a
majority of the Bonds. For this purpose, a Bondholder will be
deemed to have consented with respect to its Bonds if he has not
objected in writing within five (5) calendar days after the receipt
of the consent request. GK Development or an affiliate may elect to
waive or defer certain of these fees in its sole discretion. This
table assumes that the maximum offering amount of $50,000,000 is
sold in this offering.
|
Form of Compensation
|
|
Description
|
|
Estimated Amount of Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering and Organization Stage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organization
and Offering Expenses:
|
|
GK
Development will be reimbursed for organization and offering
expenses.
|
|
$275,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promotional
Fee:
|
|
GK
Development will be paid a promotional fee for organizing and
structuring the offering equal to 1.88% of the offering
proceeds.
|
|
$940,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Stage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
Management Services Fee:
|
|
In
connection with the provision of property management services, GK
Development, will receive an annual property management fee, of up
to 5.0% of the monthly gross income from any property it manages.
The property management fee will be paid in arrears on a monthly
basis.
|
|
Impractical
to determine at this time(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
Fee:
|
|
GK
Development will be entitled to 2% of the purchase price of each
property purchased from non-affiliated, third party sellers for
identifying, reviewing, evaluating, investing in and the purchase
of real property acquisitions. Our company does not anticipate
acquiring any properties from non-affiliated, third party sellers
in the twelve (12) months following the qualification of this
offering, and, therefore, does not expect to pay any acquisition
fees during that time period. However, our company has not yet
entered any definitive agreements for the purchase of assets from
affiliates.
|
|
Impractical
to determine at this time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
Fee:
|
|
GK
Development will be entitled to 2% of the principal amount of any
financing in conjunction with purchase or refinance of an
asset.(2)
|
|
Impractical
to determine at this time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposition
Fee:
|
|
GK
Development will receive 2% of the gross sale price from the
disposition of each property by our company.
|
|
Impractical
to determine at this time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
of Expenses:
|
|
GK
Development will be reimbursed by our company for all costs
incurred by GK Development and its affiliates when performing
services on behalf of our company.
|
|
Impractical
to determine at this time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation Stage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement
of Expenses:
|
|
GK
Development will be reimbursed by our company for reasonable and
necessary expenses paid or incurred by GK Development in the future
in connection with the liquidation of our company, including any
legal and accounting costs to be paid from operating
revenue.
|
|
Impractical
to determine at this time
|
In
connection with our acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing from an
unaffiliated, third party seller, our manager became entitled to
$845,000 payable as an acquisition fee, representing 2% of the
purchase price. In connection with our acquisition of 2700 Ygnacio
from an unaffiliated, third party seller, our manager became
entitled to $300,000 payable as an acquisition fee, representing 2%
of the purchase price.
_____________
|
(1)
|
Although
impractical to determine for future years, we received Property
Management Services Fees of $25,855, and $112,918, and $229,570 in
2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
GK
Development may employ third parties, both affiliated and
unaffiliated, to assist in securing debt financing for our company.
In such an event, GK Development may reallow all or a portion of
the financing fee to such third party. In connection with our
company’s acquisition of Lake Mead Crossing, GK Development
reallowed 100% of the financing fee, $655,000, to M Capital
Partners LLC, an unaffiliated, third party, and $170,600 to the
mezzanine lender. In connection with our company's acquisition of
2700 Ygnacio, GK Development reallowed 100% of the financing fee,
$226,500, to M Capital Partners LLC, an unaffiliated, third
party.
|
PRIOR PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Prior Investment Programs
The
information presented in this section represents the historical
experience of real estate programs sponsored by GK Development.
These are all private programs as GK Development has sponsored no
public programs other than our company. Investors in this offering
should not assume that they will experience returns, if any,
comparable to those experienced by investors in any of GK
Development’s prior programs. Investors who purchase Bonds
will not acquire any ownership interest in any of the programs
discussed in this section.
The
Prior Performance Tables set forth information as of December 31,
2017 regarding certain of these prior programs regarding: (1)
experience in raising and investing funds (Table I); (2)
compensation to GK Development or its affiliates (separate and
distinct from any return on its investment) (Table II); (3) annual
operating results (Table III); and (4) results of completed
programs (Table IV). Sales or disposals of properties (Table V)
have been omitted because no transactions of this nature have been
completed during the three years ended December 31, 2017 by
programs with similar investment objectives. We will furnish copies
of Table VI which shows acquisitions of properties by prior
programs to any prospective investor upon request and without
charge.
As
of June 30, 2018, GK Development was the sponsor of nine
private programs that had closed offerings in the prior ten years;
none of which had investment objectives similar to our company (see
Tables I, II and III). Of the seven prior private programs that
closed offerings within the prior five years, we do not believe
that any of them had similar investment objectives to our company
because: (i) four of the programs were equity programs designed to
invest in a single, identified asset and (ii) the remaining three
programs were notes programs designed to make loans to identified
affiliates of GK Development.
As
of June 30, 2018, the nine private programs of which GK
Development was sponsor had raised in the aggregate $174 million in
equity and debt capital from a total of 1,991 total investors, and
acquired a total of twenty-eight properties with an aggregate
acquisition cost of approximately $650,000,000. Of these nine
programs, none have been completed.
As a
percentage of acquisition costs, the diversification of these
properties by geographic area is as follows:
|
Geographic
Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest
|
51.6%
|
|
South
|
33.3%
|
|
West
|
15.1%
|
All of
the properties acquired by GK Development’s prior programs
are retail properties, which are commercial properties. Our manager
‘s prior programs have acquired no residential properties. Of
the acquisitions of the prior programs, 2% were new properties or
developed by an affiliate and 98% were used properties. Our
manager’s prior programs described herein have sold an
aggregate of two (2) properties.
Set
forth below is a brief summary of each of the prior programs
sponsored by GK Development in the prior ten years as of December
31, 2017.
InvestLinc GK Properties Fund II, LLC (“Fund
II”)
Fund II
was formed in March 2004 to invest in commercial real estate
opportunities through investments in income producing real estate
throughout the United States. Fund II raised $39,351,400 (393,514
units or $1,000 per unit) from accredited investors through a
private placement offering. Fund II expired on December 31, 2017.
Fund II’s portfolio consisted of a regional mall, Lufkin
Mall, located in Lufkin, TX and a large open-air shopping center,
Yorkshire Plaza, located in Aurora, IL. Fund II’s cash from
operations was materially and adversely affected by the economic
recession of 2008-2009, which resulted in significant financial
hardship to the tenants of Fund II’s retail investments. As a
result, Fund II had several tenants either go bankrupt or cease
paying under their leases or require significant rent concessions
to stay in their spaces. In order to preserve cash needed to meet
Fund II’s debt service obligations and avoid default and
foreclosure on Fund II’s properties, GK Development, as Fund
II’s manager, determined it was in the best interest of Fund
II to reduce distributions below Fund II’s targeted
distribution amount. In March 2016, Fund II sold one Lufkin Mall
for $30,250,000. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately
$1,800,000. As of December 31, 2017, Fund II redeemed 84.43% of the
investors. The amount paid to those interests was $5,398,242.48.
Fund II sold Yorkshire Plaza on February 28, 2018 for $18,000,000.
Fund II was closed in 2018 upon the $5,000,000 distribution to the
remaining investors which included the gain on sale plus the cash
in Fund II.
GK Properties Fund III, LLC (“Fund III”)
Fund
III was formed in April 2006 to invest primarily in commercial real
estate opportunities through investments in income producing real
estate throughout the United States. Fund III raised $24,007,395
(2.4 million units) from accredited investors through a private
placement offering. Fund III is scheduled to expire on April 20,
2019. Fund III’s portfolio consisted of College Square Mall
Development, a property adjacent to College Square Mall, located in
Cedar Falls, IA; and Peru Mall, a regional mall, located in Peru,
IL. Fund III’s cash from operations was materially and
adversely affected by the economic recession of 2008-2009, which
resulted in significant financial hardship to the tenants of Fund
III’s retail investments. As a result, Fund III had several
tenants either go bankrupt or cease paying under their leases or
require significant rent concessions to stay in their spaces. In
order to preserve cash needed to meet Fund III’s debt service
obligations and avoid default and foreclosure on Fund III’s
properties, GK Development, as Fund III’s manager, determined
it was in the best interest of Fund III to reduce distributions
below Fund III’s targeted distribution amount. By retaining
funds, the goal is to create value for investors over time,
increasing the possibility of resuming distributions and maximizing
returns for investors at the conclusion of Fund III. In
February 2016 and April 2016, Fund III sold parcels of College
Square Mall Development for $2,000,000 and $10,121,000,
respectively. The sales resulted in a gain aggregating
approximately $6,200,000. Through December 31, 2017, 59% of the
investors were paid a final distribution of $3,317,505 and have
been fully redeemed out of Fund III. In total, Fund III investors
have received distributions of $7,321,646 ($3.01 per unit) as of
December 31, 2017.
Grand Center Partners, LLC (“GCP”)
In
March 2012, GCP raised $2,410,000 from accredited investors through
a private placement offering for the purpose of making a preferred
equity investment to fund the development of a retail shopping
center known as The Shops at North Grand, located in Ames, IA. The
property consisted of (i) 98,827 square feet of inline “big
box” retail space leased to Kohl’s, The Gap Outlet,
Shoe Carnival and TJ Maxx; (ii) two fully leased single tenant
outparcel buildings totaling 5,613 square feet; (iii) an outparcel
pad approximating 0.57 acres; and (iv) a multi-tenant outparcel
building consisting of 8,731 square feet. The retail shopping
center was sold in November 2013 and the investors received cash
distributions aggregating $3,224,000. The projected liquidation for
this investment was 2017; however, the investors received a return
of their equity, plus a return on their equity in
2013.
GDH Investments, LLC (“GDH”)
In September
2012, GDH raised $2,000,000 from accredited investors through a
private placement offering for the purpose of making a preferred
equity investment into GDH to fund the re-development of a
neighborhood shopping center located in the Lincoln Park
North/Sheffield/Clybourn retail corridor in Chicago, Illinois. The
center consisted of 35,400 square feet of retail space and a 43-car
underground parking facility. The property was sold in January 2014
and the investors received cash distributions of $3,123,000. The
projected liquidation for this investment was 2017; however, the
investors received a return of their equity, plus a return on their
equity in 2014.
GK
Secured Income I, LLC (“GKSI I”)
GKSI I
was formed in December 2012 to provide a loan to an entity
affiliated with our manager of GKSI I. GKSI I raised $7,364,587
from accredited investors through a private placement offering. The
investors are entitled to receive a return of 8% per annum payable
monthly. Through December 31, 2017, $2,698,025 has been paid
to its members, representing an 8% annual return from inception. To
date, no sales of properties or capital events have occurred in
GKSI I. GKSI I anticipates, but is not obligated, to liquidate
within five to seven years of the termination of its offering,
December 2017. Therefore, GKSI I has not yet reached its
anticipated liquidity event.
GK Preferred Income I (Lakeview Square), LLC (“GKPI
I”)
GKPI I
was formed in February 2013, to acquire, own and operate, through a
wholly-owned subsidiary, a regional mall known as Lakeview Square
Mall, located in Battle Creek, MI. Lakeview Square Mall consists of
551,228 square feet of retail space, of which 259,635 square feet
is owned by GKPI I, with the remaining 291,593 square feet being
owned by the following anchor tenants; Sears, JC Penney and
Macy’s. GKPI I raised $5,177,239 of preferred equity from
accredited investors through a private placement offering. The
investors are entitled to receive a minimum preferred return of 7%
per annum. As of March 31, 2015, all of the preferred equity
($5,177,239) has been returned to the investors, together with a
15% annualized preferred return. As of December 31, 2017, the
investors have been fully redeemed out of the Fund.
GK Preferred Income II (Ridgmar), LLC (“GKPI
II”)
GKPI II
was formed in August 2013, to acquire and own, through wholly-owned
subsidiaries, an 87.50% Tenant-in-Common (“TIC”)
interest in a regional mall known as Ridgmar Mall, located in Ft.
Worth, TX. The remaining TIC interest is held by an affiliate of
the sponsor. Ridgmar Mall consists of 1,235,515 square feet of
retail space, of which 398,840 square feet is owned by the TIC,
with the remaining 836,675 square feet being owned by the following
anchor tenants: Dillard’s, Macy’s, Neiman Marcus,
Sears, and JC Penney. During 2013 and 2014, GKPI II raised
$23,864,440 of preferred equity from accredited investors through a
private placement offering. The investors are entitled to receive a
preferred equity return of 7% per annum. Through December 31, 2017,
$5,055,032 has been paid to its members, representing a 7%
preferred return. GKPI II has ceased distributions in 2017 due
to the several tenants either going bankrupt or cease paying under
their leases or require significant rent concessions to stay in
their spaces. Out of the five anchors tenants above, three (Neiman
Marcus, Sears, JC Penney) have vacated the mall, which has
triggered co-tenancy clauses with other tenants. As a result, GKPI
II has had a significant reduction to NOI. GKPI II is in
negotiations with the bank on a redevelopment plan to revitalize
Ridgmar Mall. To date, no sales of properties or capital events
have occurred in GKPI II. GKPI II anticipates, but is not
obligated, to liquidate within five to seven years of the
termination of its offering, August 2018. Therefore, GKPI II has
not yet reached its anticipated liquidity event.
GK Secured Income Investments III, LLC (“GKSI
III”)
GKSI
III was formed in October 2014 to provide loans to Fund I and to
Peru GKD Partners, LLC (“Peru”) on a 50/50 basis. Peru
is owned by Fund III. Both Fund I and Fund II are affiliated with
our manager of GKSI III. Through December 31, 2015, GKSI III
raised $11,111,776 from accredited investors through a private
placement offering. The members are entitled to receive a preferred
return of 9% per annum payable monthly. Through December 31, 2017,
$2,764,861 has been paid to investors, representing a 9%
annual return. To date, no sales of properties or capital
events have occurred in GKSI III. GKSI III anticipates, but is not
obligated, to liquidate within five to seven years of the
termination of its offering, October 2017. Therefore, GKSI III has
not yet reached its anticipated liquidity event.
GK Secured Income IV, LLC (“GKSI IV”)
GKSI IV
was formed in September 2015 to provide loans in the aggregate of
$10,000,000 to Lake Mead Partners, LLC, which loans were to be
secured by our company pledging all of its equity interest in Lake
Mead Partners, LLC. Through December 31, 2015, GKSI IV raised
$10,779,000 from accredited investors through a private placement
offering. In the first year, the members are entitled to receive a
preferred return of 7% per annum. Through December 31, 2017,
$1,625,453 has been paid to investors, representing a 7%
annual return. To date, no sales of properties or capital events
have occurred in GKSI IV. GKSI IV anticipates, but is not
obligated, to liquidate within five to seven years of the
termination of its offering, November 2018. Therefore, GKSI IV has
not yet reached its anticipated liquidity event.
GK Preferred Income III (Lufkin), LLC (“GKPI
III”)
GKPI
III was formed on April 2, 2015, to acquire, own and operate,
through a wholly-owned subsidiary, a regional mall known as Lufkin
Mall, located in Lufkin Texas. Lufkin Mall consists of 371,309
square feet of total space, of which approximately 348,468 square
feet is owned by GKPI III, with the remaining 22,841 square feet
being owned by Boot Barn. GKPI III raised $9,835,745 of preferred
equity from accredited investors through a private placement
offering. The investors are entitled to receive a minimum preferred
return of 7% per annum. Through December 31, 2017, $1,296,929 has
been paid to its members, representing a 7% annual preferred return
from inception. To date, no sales of properties or capital events
have occurred in GKPI III. GKPI III anticipate, but is not
obligated, to liquidate within five to seven years of the
termination of its offering April 2020. Therefore, GKPI III has not
reached its anticipated liquidity event.
GK
DST - Cedar Falls Grocery, LLC
GK DST
– Cedar Falls Grocery was formed on April 5, 2016, to acquire
through a Section 1031 exchange to acquire, own and operate,
through a wholly-owned subsidiary, a one tenant Hy-Vee grocery
store, located in Cedar Falls Iowa. The Hy-Vee Grocery Store
consists of 105,817 square feet. GK DST – Cedar Falls Grocery
raised $5,076,122 of funding from accredited investors through a
private placement offering. The investors are entitled to receive a
minimum preferred return of 6% per annum. Through December 31,
2017, $483,125 has been paid to its members, representing a 6%
annual preferred return from inception. To date, no sales of
properties or capital events have occurred in GK DST – Cedar
Falls Grocery. GK DST – Cedar Falls Grocery anticipate, but
is not obligated, to liquidate within ten years of the termination
coterminous with the first mortgage financing April 2026.
Therefore, GK DST – Cedar Falls Grocery has not reached its
anticipated liquidity event.
LIMITATIONS ON
LIABILITY
Our
manager and executive officers, if any are appointed by our
manager, will owe fiduciary duties to our company and our members
in the manner prescribed in the Delaware Limited Liability Company
Act and applicable case law. Neither our manager nor any executive
officer will owe fiduciary duties to our bondholders. Our manager
is required to act in good faith and in a manner that it determines
to be in our best interests. However, nothing in our Operating
Agreement precludes our manager or executive officers or any
affiliate of our manager or any of their respective officers,
directors, employees, members or trustees from acting, as a
director, officer or employee of any corporation, a trustee of any
trust, an executor or administrator of any estate, a member of any
company or an administrative official of any other business entity,
or from receiving any compensation or participating in any profits
in connection with any of the foregoing, and neither our company
nor any member shall have any right to participate in any manner in
any profits or income earned or derived by our manager or any
affiliate thereof or any of their respective officers, directors,
employees, members or trustees, from or in connection with the
conduct of any such other business venture or activity. Our
manager, its executive officers, any affiliate of any of them, or
any shareholder, officer, director, employee, partner, member or
any person or entity owning an interest therein, may engage in or
possess an interest in any other business or venture of any nature
or description, provided that such activities do not compete with
the business of our company or otherwise breach their agreements
with our company; and no member or other person or entity shall
have any interest in such other business or venture by reason of
its interest in our company.
Our
manager or executive officers have no liability to our company or
to any member for any claims, costs, expenses, damages, or losses
suffered by our company which arise out of any action or inaction
of any manager or executive officer if such manager or executive
officer meets the following standards: (i) such manager or
executive officer, in good faith, reasonably determined that such
course of conduct or omission was in, or not opposed to, the best
interests of our company, and (ii) such course of conduct did not
constitute fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence or any
breach of fiduciary duty to our company or its members. These
exculpation provisions in our Operating Agreement are intended to
protect our manager and executive officers from liability when
exercising their business judgment regarding transactions we may
enter into.
Insofar
as the foregoing provisions permit indemnification or exculpation
of our manager, executive officers or other persons controlling us
from liability arising under the Securities Act, we have been
informed that in the opinion of the SEC this indemnification and
exculpation is against public policy as expressed in the Securities
Act and is therefore unenforceable.
EXPERTS
The
consolidated financial statements of our company as of December 31,
2016 and 2017, which comprise the balance sheets as of December 31,
2016 and 2017 and the related statements of operations,
members’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December
31, 2016 and 2017, and the related notes to the consolidated
financial statements and the Statement of Revenues and Certain
Direct Operating Expenses of 2700 Ygnacio for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016 included in this Offering Circular and the
related notes to those financial statements, have been audited by
Eide Bailly LLP, an independent public accounting firm, as stated
in their report appearing elsewhere herein, and upon authority of
said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
LEGAL MATTERS
Certain
legal matters in connection with this offering, including the
validity of the Bonds, will be passed upon for us by Kaplan Voekler
Cunningham & Frank, PLC.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We
maintain a website, www.gkdevelopment.com, which contains
additional information concerning GK Development and our company.
Our company will file, annual, semi-annual and special reports, and
other information, as applicable, with the SEC. You may read and
copy any document filed with the SEC at the SEC’s public
Company reference room at Room 1580, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the public reference room. The SEC also
maintains a web site that contains reports, and informational
statements, and other information regarding issuers that file
electronically with the SEC (http://www.sec.gov).
Our
company has filed an Offering Statement of which this Offering
Circular is a part with the SEC under the Securities Act. The
Offering Statement contains additional information about us. You
may inspect the Offering Statement without charge at the office of
the SEC at Room 1580, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549,
and you may obtain copies from the SEC at prescribed
rates.
This
Offering Circular does not contain all of the information included
in the Offering Statement. We have omitted certain parts of the
Offering Statement in accordance with the rules and regulations of
the SEC. For further information, we refer you to the Offering
Statement, which may be found at the SEC’s website
at http://www.sec.gov. Statements contained in this Offering
Circular and any accompanying supplement about the provisions or
contents of any contract, agreement or any other document referred
to are not necessarily complete. Please refer to the actual exhibit
for a more complete description of the matters
involved.
PART F/S
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
Pro Forma Financial Information for Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2017
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
Unaudited
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
Notes
to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Information
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
Unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements for the Six Months Ended June 30,
2018
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Members’ Equity (Unaudited)
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flow (Unaudited)
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
F-10
|
|
|
Financial
Statements for Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2017 and
2016
|
|
F-25
|
|
|
Independent
Auditor’s Report
|
|
F-25
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
F-26
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
F-27
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Members’ Equity
|
|
F-28
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
F-29
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
F-31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2700 Ygnacio
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
of Revenues and Certain Operating Expenses for Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
F-46
|
|
|
Independent
Auditor’s Report
|
|
F-46
|
|
|
Statement
of Revenues and Certain Operating Expenses
|
|
F-47
|
|
|
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
|
F-48
|
|
|
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)
|
Pro Forma Financial Information
December 31, 2017
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of
Operations
For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Period January 1,
2017 through December 31, 2017
|
Estimated Statement of Operations for 2700 Ygnacio for the Period
January 1, 2017 through
January 29, 2017
|
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations for the period
January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
rents
|
$5,613,107
|
$200,048
|
$5,813,155
|
|
Tenant
recoveries
|
459,198
|
3,477
|
462,675
|
|
|
6,072,305
|
203,525
|
6,275,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Other
operating expenses
|
1,149,276
|
51,890
|
1,201,166
|
|
Insurance
|
93,107
|
3,351
|
96,458
|
|
Management
fees
|
229,570
|
9,259
|
238,829
|
|
Professional
fees
|
141,785
|
1,815
|
143,600
|
|
Real
estate taxes
|
358,111
|
14,599
|
372,710
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,399,954
|
125,898
|
3,525,852
|
|
|
5,371,803
|
206,812
|
5,578,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and Expense
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
90
|
-
|
90
|
|
Interest
Expense
|
(3,238,256)
|
(49,834)
|
-3,288,090
|
|
Miscellaneous
income
|
13,374
|
-
|
13,374
|
|
Gain
on sale of rental property
|
1,738,882
|
-
|
1,738,882
|
|
|
(1,485,910)
|
(49,834)
|
(1,535,744)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Net Income/(Loss)
|
$(785,408)
|
$(53,121)
|
$(838,529)
|
See
Accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated
Financial Information
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
On
January 30, 2017, GK Investment Holdings, LLC
(“Applicant”), through its wholly owned limited
liability company 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC, purchased a Class A
office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and
Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California (“2700 Ygnacio")
from an unrelated third-party seller (“Predecessor”).
2700 Ygnacio is comprised of 107,970 rentable square feet and all
management and ownership responsibilities was assumed as of January
30, 2017.
The
unaudited consolidated pro forma statement of operations for the
six months ended June 30, 2017, as adjusted, gives effect to the
acquisition of 2700 Ygnacio as if the acquisition had occurred on
December 31, 2016. Additionally, the unaudited pro forma
consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended
December 31, 2017 is based on combining the Applicants consolidated
statement of operations for the period from January 1, 2017 through
December 31, 2017 with the estimated statement of operations of
2700 Ygnacio for the period January 1, 2017 through January 29,
2017.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Estimates - The preparation of this
financial statement in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that may affect the amounts reported
in the financial statement and related notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Rental Recognition – The
Property’s leases with tenants are classified as operating
leases. Rental income is recognized ratably over the term of the
respective leases, inclusive of leases which provide for scheduled
rent increases and rental concessions. Straight line rent
adjustment included in minimum rents, reflected an increase in
rental revenue on the statement of revenue and certain direct
operating expenses in the amount of $147,579 for the period from
January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.
Reimbursements from Tenants - During the
term of their respective leases, certain of the tenants pay a pro
rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating
expenses (as defined), over a base year. Estimated recoveries are
recognized as revenue in the period the applicable expenses are
incurred.
|
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
(a Delaware limited liability company)
|
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
June 30,
2018
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
Rental
properties
|
$55,753,225
|
$55,431,830
|
|
Less:
Accumulated depreciation
|
3,356,877
|
2,700,819
|
|
|
52,396,348
|
52,731,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
1,569,096
|
788,301
|
|
Accounts
receivable - tenants
|
59,206
|
72,759
|
|
Deferred
rent receivable
|
205,899
|
189,884
|
|
Deferred
leasing costs - Net
|
657,071
|
772,220
|
|
Lease
intangibles - Net
|
2,550,471
|
3,397,992
|
|
Restricted
cash - funded reserves
|
687,829
|
977,453
|
|
Other
assets
|
113,588
|
124,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$58,239,508
|
$59,053,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable - Net
|
$44,514,637
|
$48,432,954
|
|
Bonds
payable - Net
|
10,901,729
|
6,508,198
|
|
Accrued
financing fees payable
|
199,570
|
199,570
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
9,751
|
-
|
|
Deferred
rent
|
141,474
|
110,425
|
|
Lease
intangibles - Net
|
1,750,460
|
1,958,035
|
|
Accrued
interest
|
180,140
|
185,765
|
|
Other
accrued liabilities
|
76,936
|
98,504
|
|
Due
to affiliates
|
24,717
|
25,857
|
|
Tenant
security deposits
|
121,746
|
122,803
|
|
Total liabilities
|
57,921,160
|
57,642,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 7 and 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members' Equity
|
|
|
|
Members'
Equity
|
318,348
|
1,411,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$58,239,508
|
$59,053,817
|
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ending June 30, 2018 and 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
Minimum
rents
|
$2,698,683
|
$2,708,999
|
|
Tenant
recoveries
|
206,442
|
251,628
|
|
|
2,905,125
|
2,960,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
517,509
|
562,250
|
|
Insurance
|
52,523
|
40,776
|
|
Management
fees
|
108,522
|
107,454
|
|
Professional
fees
|
38,914
|
44,687
|
|
Real
estate taxes
|
187,375
|
197,712
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,441,872
|
1,666,130
|
|
|
2,346,715
|
2,619,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
196
|
11
|
|
Interest
expense
|
(1,658,484)
|
(1,615,817)
|
|
Miscellaneous
income
|
6,520
|
3,305
|
|
Gain
on sale of rental property
|
-
|
1,738,882
|
|
|
(1,651,768)
|
126,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Net (Loss)/Income
|
$(1,093,358)
|
$467,999
|
In the
opinion of management all adjustments necessary in order to make
interim financial statements not misleading have been
included.
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ending June 30, 2018 and for the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ending
June 30,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - Beginning of Period
|
$1,411,706
|
$2,197,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Net (Loss)
|
(1,093,358)
|
(785,408)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - End of Period
|
$318,348
|
$1,411,706
|
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ending June 30, 2018 and 2017
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Net Income/(Loss)
|
$(1,093,358)
|
$467,999
|
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income/(loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,441,872
|
1,666,130
|
|
Amortization
of above-market leases
|
200,961
|
193,891
|
|
Accretion
of below-market leases
|
(207,575)
|
(233,516)
|
|
Deferred
rent receivable
|
(16,015)
|
(57,499)
|
|
Gain
on sale of rental property
|
-
|
(1,738,882)
|
|
Amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
106,394
|
115,865
|
|
Amortization
of bond issuance and bond discount costs
|
84,015
|
25,661
|
|
Changes
in:
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable - tenants
|
13,553
|
39,132
|
|
Other
receivables - tenant
|
-
|
75,969
|
|
Other
assets
|
10,609
|
(82,853)
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
9,751
|
62,234
|
|
Deferred
rent
|
31,049
|
109,778
|
|
Accrued
interest
|
(5,625)
|
37,351
|
|
Other
accrued liabilities
|
(21,568)
|
13,264
|
|
Due
to affiliates
|
(1,140)
|
101,072
|
|
Tenant
security deposits
|
(1,057)
|
82,694
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
551,866
|
878,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of rental property
|
-
|
(14,905,290)
|
|
Acquisition
costs incurred
|
-
|
(369,573)
|
|
Additions
to rental properties
|
(321,395)
|
(66,383)
|
|
Net
proceeds from sale of rental property
|
-
|
3,618,905
|
|
Payments
of deferred leasing commissions
|
(24,107)
|
(107,161)
|
|
Deposits
for acquisition of rental property
|
-
|
1,005,000
|
|
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(345,502)
|
(10,824,502)
|
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ending June 30, 2018 and 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
$-
|
$12,775,000
|
|
Repayment
of related party/notes payable
|
(3,515,000)
|
(5,319,000)
|
|
Principal
payment on notes payable
|
(509,708)
|
(466,887)
|
|
Payment
of financing costs
|
-
|
(160,012)
|
|
Proceeds
from bonds payable
|
4,835,000
|
3,364,000
|
|
Payment
of bond issue costs
|
(525,485)
|
(318,697)
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
284,807
|
9,874,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash and Restricted Cash
|
491,171
|
(71,808)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Restricted Cash
- Beginning of
period
|
1,765,754
|
1,328,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Restricted Cash
- End of period
|
$2,256,925
|
$1,256,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
$1,473,700
|
$1,436,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Investing and Financing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
fees accrued and not paid
|
$-
|
$161,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
costs accrued and not paid
|
$-
|
$20,000
|
Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Description of Business
- On September 14, 2015, GK
Investment Holdings, LLC (“GKIH” and/or the
“Company”), a Delaware limited liability company was
formed with the intent to acquire existing income producing
commercial rental properties for the purpose of holding and
operating such properties, and if the need arises, to redevelop the
rental properties for an alternative use other than intended when
originally acquired. However, GKIH is permitted to transact in any
lawful business in addition to that stated above. GKIH anticipates
funding acquisitions in part, by offering to investors the
opportunity to purchase up to a maximum of $50,000,000 of Bonds of
which $11,948,000 and $7,133,000 was sold as of June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2017, respectively (Note 8). The Bonds are unsecured
indebtedness of GKIH.
The
members of GKIH have limited liability. Pursuant to the terms of
the Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (the
“Agreement”), the Company will exist in perpetuity
unless terminated as defined in the Agreement. The Company is
managed by GK Development, Inc. (the “Manager” and
“Sponsor of the bonds”), an affiliate of one of the
members of GKIH.
On
October 22, 2015, Lake Mead Parent, LLC (“LM Parent”)
and Lake Mead Development, LLC (“LM Development”), both
Delaware limited liability companies were formed and on October 22,
2015, Lake Mead Partners, LLC (“LM Partners”), a
Delaware limited liability company was formed and 100% of LM
Partners is owned by LM Parent. On October 21, 2016, 2700 Ygnacio
Partners, LLC (“Ygnacio”), a Delaware limited liability
company was formed. LM Parent, LM Development and Ygnacio are 100%
owned by GKIH.
The
Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as of June 30, 2018, are
as follows:
LM
Parent – 100% owned by GKIH; owns 100% of LM
Partners;
LM
Development – 100% owned by GKIH;
Ygnacio
– 100% owned by GKIH.
LM
Partners and LM Development were formed to acquire, own, and
operate a retail power center known as Lake Mead Crossing, located
in Henderson, Nevada ("Lake Mead Crossings"). Lake Mead Crossings
was purchased on November 12, 2015. Prior to the purchase of Lake
Mead Crossings, GKIH had no activity. Ygnacio was formed to acquire
a three-story Class A office building located at the corner of
North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California.
Ygnacio was purchased on January 30, 2017.
The
acquisition of Lake Mead Crossings was financed as
follows:
LM Parent - (i) a first mortgage loan in the maximum amount
of $30,000,000, of which $29,500,000 was funded upon acquisition;
(ii) a mezzanine loan, in the maximum amount of $10,500,000,
allocated between LM Partners and LM Development, of which
$7,210,298 was funded to LM Partners upon acquisition and (iii) an
interim loan from GK Development, Inc. of which $2,608,100 was
funded upon acquisition.
LM Development
- (i) a first mortgage loan in the
original amount of $2,700,000; (ii) a mezzanine loan, in the
maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Partners and LM
Development, of which $339,702 was funded to LM Development upon
acquisition and (iii) an interim loan from GK Development, Inc. of
which $20,000 was funded upon acquisition.
The
acquisition of Ygnacio was financed with (i) bond proceeds in the
amount of $1,750,000; (ii) a first mortgage loan in the maximum
amount of $11,325,000, of which $500,000 was retained by the lender
to establish a funded reserve for tenant improvements/lease
commissions; and (iii) an interim loan from GK Development, Inc. of
which $2,305,000 was funded upon acquisition.
Allocation of Profits and
Losses - Profits or losses from
operations of the Company are allocated to the members of GKIH in
their ownership percentages. Gains and losses from the sale,
exchange, or other disposition of Company property are allocated to
the members of GKIH in their ownership
percentages.
Principles of
Consolidation - The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant material
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the
consolidation.
Basis of Accounting
- The Company maintains its accounting
records and prepares its consolidated financial statements on an
accrual basis, which is in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”).
Classification of Assets and
Liabilities - The financial
affairs of the Company generally do not involve a business cycle
since the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities
are usually dependent on the Company’s circumstances.
Accordingly, the classification of current assets and current
liabilities is not considered appropriate and has been omitted from
the consolidated balance sheets.
Estimates - The preparation of consolidated financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments -Our financial
instruments consist of cash, funded reserves, short-term trade
receivables, notes payable and bonds payable. The carrying values
of cash, funded reserves, and short-term receivables approximate
their fair value due to their short-term maturities. The carrying
value of the notes payable and bonds payable approximates their
fair value based on interest rates currently
obtainable.
Cash and Restricted Cash
- The Company maintains cash and
restricted cash balances in federally insured financial
institutions that, from time to time, exceed the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation limits. The Company believes that they are
not exposed to any significant credit risk on its cash and
restricted cash. Restricted cash consists of tenant
improvement/lease commission reserves and bond service
reserves.
Revenue and Gain
Recognition - On January 1,
2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (Topic 606),
(“Topic 606”) using the modified retrospective method
applying it to any open contracts as of January 1, 2018, for which
the Company did not identify any open contracts. The Company also
utilized the practical expedient for which the Company was not
required to restate revenue from contracts that began and are
completed within the same annual reporting period. Results for
reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018, are presented
under Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and
continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting
under Revenue Recognition (Topic 605). The new guidance provides a
unified model to determine how revenue is recognized. To
determine the proper amount of revenue to be recognized, the
Company performs the following steps: (i) identify the contract
with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations within
the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate
the transaction price to the performance obligations and (v)
recognize revenue when (or as) a performance obligation is
satisfied. As of June 30, 2018, the Company had no outstanding
contract assets or contract liabilities. The adoption of this
standard did not result in any material changes to the
Company’s revenue recognition as compared to the previous
guidance.
Revenues from rental
properties - Revenues from
rental properties are comprised of minimum base rent, percentage
rent, lease termination fee income, amortization of above-market
and below-market rent adjustments and straight-line rent
adjustments. Base rental revenues from rental properties are
recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related
leases. Certain of these leases also provide for percentage rents
based upon the level of sales achieved by the lessee. These
percentage rents are recognized once the required sales level is
achieved. Rental income may also include payments received in
connection with lease termination agreements. Lease
termination fee income is recognized when the lessee provides
consideration in order to terminate a lease agreement in place. The
performance obligation of the Company is the termination of the
lease agreement which occurs upon consideration received and
execution of the termination agreement. Upon acquisition of real
estate operating properties, the Company estimates the fair value
of identified intangible assets and liabilities (including
above-market and below-market leases, where applicable). The
capitalized above-market or below-market intangible is amortized to
rental income over the estimated remaining term of the respective
leases, which includes the expected renewal option period for
below-market leases.
Impairment of Assets
- The Company reviews the recoverability of
long-lived assets including buildings, equipment, and other
intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances occur
that indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be
recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on the
ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from the
expected future pretax cash flows (undiscounted and without
interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows
are less than the carrying value of such assets, an impairment loss
is recognized for the difference between the estimated fair value
and the carrying value. The measurement of impairment requires
management to make estimates of these cash flows related to long
lived assets, as well as other fair value determinations. The
Company does not believe that there are any events or circumstances
indicating impairment of its investments in the rental properties
and related long lived assets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31,
2017.
Debt Issuance Costs
- Debt issuance costs represent fees
and other third-party costs associated with obtaining financing for
the rental properties. These costs are amortized on a straight-line
basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the
term of the respective loan agreements. Debt issuance costs are
presented on the consolidated balance sheets as a direct reduction
from the carrying amount of the debt liability. Unamortized costs
are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid
before maturity. Amortization expense is included in interest
expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Bond Issuance Costs and Bond
Discounts - Bond issuance costs
represent underwriting compensation and offering costs and expenses
associated with selling the bonds. Bond discounts are a
volume-weighted discount (three to five percent) dependent on how
many bonds are purchased. Both of these costs are amortized on a
straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest
method, over the term of the bonds. Bond issuance and bond discount
costs are presented on the consolidated balance sheets as a direct
reduction from the carrying amount of the bond liability.
Unamortized bond issue and bond discount costs will be expensed if
the bonds are repaid before maturity (September 30, 2022).
Amortization expense is included in interest expense on the
accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Deferred Leasing Costs -
Deferred leasing costs represent
leasing commissions, legal fees and other third-party costs
associated with obtaining tenants for the rental properties. These
costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the
respective leases. Amortization expense is included in depreciation
and amortization expense on the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
Lease Intangible Assets and
Liabilities - GAAP requires
intangible assets and liabilities to be recognized apart from
goodwill if they arise from contractual or other legal rights
(regardless of whether those rights are transferrable or separable
from the acquired entity or from other rights and
obligations).
Upon
the acquisition of both Lake Mead Crossings and Ygnacio (the
“Properties”), the Company recorded above and
below-market leases based on the present value (using an interest
rate which reflected the risks associated with the leases acquired)
of the difference between (a) the contractual amounts to be paid
pursuant to the in-place leases and (b) the Company estimates of
fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases
measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term
of the lease. These assets and liabilities are being amortized or
accreted on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the
respective tenant leases and the amortization or accretion is being
recorded as an adjustment to rental income, on the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
Upon
the acquisition of the Properties, the Company estimated the value
of acquired leasing commissions as the costs the Company would have
incurred to lease the Properties to its occupancy level at the date
each Property was acquired. Such estimate, which is included in
lease intangibles on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets,
includes the fair value of leasing commissions, legal costs and
other third-party costs that would be incurred to lease the
Properties to the level at the date of the acquisition. Such costs
are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining
life of the respective tenant leases and the amortization is being
recorded in depreciation and amortization expense on the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Additionally,
the Company estimated the value of acquired in-place lease costs as
the costs the Company would have incurred to lease the Properties
to its occupancy level at the date of acquisition by evaluating the
period over which such occupancy level would be achieved and
included an estimate of the net operating costs incurred during
lease up. In-place lease costs, which are included in lease
intangibles on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are
being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of
the respective tenant leases and the amortization is being recorded
in depreciation and amortization expense on the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
Accounts Receivable Tenants and
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - Tenant receivables are comprised of billed, but
uncollected amounts due for monthly rent and other charges required
pursuant to existing rental lease agreements. An allowance for
doubtful accounts is recorded when a tenant’s receivable is
not expected to be collected. A bad debt expense is charged when a
tenant vacates a space with a remaining unpaid balance.
At June 30, 2018 and December 31,
2017, no amounts were reserved for as an allowance for doubtful
accounts. In the event a bad debt expense is recorded such amount
would be included in other operating expenses on the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
Restricted Cash - Funded
Reserves - Funded reserves
consist of (a) funds required to be maintained under the terms of
the various loan agreements, which reserves have been pledged as
additional collateral for those loans requiring funds to be
reserved and (b) bond service reserve to be maintained under the
bond indenture agreement for a period of twenty-four months
commencing from the first bond closing date (October 17,
2016).
The
following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning of
period and end of period cash and restricted cash – funded
reserves reported on the Company’s consolidated balance
sheets to the totals shown on its consolidated statements of cash
flows:
|
|
For the six-months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
of period
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
788,301
|
1,187,293
|
|
Restricted
cash - funded reserves
|
977,453
|
141,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and restricted cash - funded reserves
|
1,765,754
|
1,328,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
End
of period
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
1,569,096
|
614,764
|
|
Restricted
cash - funded reserves
|
687,829
|
642,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and restricted cash - funded reserves
|
2,256,925
|
1,256,993
|
Rental Revenue -
GAAP requires that the rental income
be recorded for the period of occupancy using the effective monthly
rent, which is the average monthly rental during the term of the
lease. Accordingly, rental income is recognized ratably over the
term of the respective leases, inclusive of leases which provide
for scheduled rent increases and rental concessions. The difference
between rental revenue earned on a straight-line basis and the cash
rent due under the provisions of the lease agreements is recorded
as deferred rent receivable on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. Rents received in advance are deferred until they
become due
and are recorded as
deferred rent in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Additionally,
during the term of their respective leases, tenants pay either (i)
their pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, and other
operating expenses (as defined in the underlying lease agreement),
or (ii) a fixed rate for recoveries.
Income Taxes
-The Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries are
treated as disregarded entities and are treated as a component of
GKIH for federal income tax reporting purposes. GKIH is treated as a partnership for federal
income tax purposes and consequently, federal income taxes are not
payable or provided for by the Company. Members of GKIH are taxed
individually on their pro-rata ownership share of the
Company’s earnings.
GAAP
basis of accounting requires management to evaluate tax positions
taken by the Company and to disclose a tax liability (or asset) if
the Company has taken uncertain positions that more than likely
than not would not be sustained upon examination by the Internal
Revenue Service or other tax authorities. Management has analyzed
the tax positions taken by the Company and has concluded that as of
June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there were no uncertain tax
positions taken or expected to be taken that would require
disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.
Changes in Accounting
Policies- In May 2014, FASB
issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09,
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606),”
which outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in
accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The
standard states that “an entity recognized revenue to depict
the transfer of promised goods or services.” While the
standard specifically references contracts with customers, it may
apply to certain other transactions such as the sale of real estate
or equipment. The Company’s adoption of the standard on
January 1, 2018 did not have an impact on the pattern of revenue
recognition.
On
November 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Restricted
Cash,” which requires that the statement of cash flows
explain the change during a reporting period in the total of cash,
cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted
cash and restricted cash equivalents. This standard states that
transfers between cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash are
not part of the entity’s operating, investing, and financing
activities. Therefore, restricted cash should be included with cash
and cash equivalents when recording the beginning-of-period and
end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted the standard and
retrospectively applied the guidance of the standard to the prior
period presented, which resulted in an increase of $500,721 in net
cash used in investing activities on its consolidated statements of
cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
In
February 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-05, “Other Income –
Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets
(Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition
Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial
Assets,” which clarifies the scope of asset derecognition and
adds further guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the
transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with non-customers.
The Company has concluded that property sales represent
transactions with non-customers. Sales of property generally
represent only one performance obligation and are recognized when
an enforceable contract is in place, collectability is ensured and
control is transferred to the buyer. The Company’s adoption
of this standard on January 1, 2018 did not have a significant
impact on its consolidated financial statements as there were no
sales of property during the period.
Restatements Resulting from
Changes in Accounting Principle – As described previously, the Company
adopted ASU 2016-18 as of January 1, 2018, which required
retroactive application of the standard as of June 30, 2018. As a
result, the statement of cash flows for the six months ended June
30, 2017 has been restated to explain the change in the total of
cash and restricted cash, and the effects of the restatement are as
follows:
|
|
|
Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
deposit to restricted cash - funded reserves
|
$(500,721)
|
$500,721
|
$-
|
|
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(11,325,223)
|
500,721
|
(10,824,502)
|
|
Net
Increase (decrease) in Cash and Restricted Cash
|
(572,529)
|
500,721
|
(71,808)
|
|
Cash
and Restricted Cash - Beginning of period
|
1,187,293
|
141,508
|
1,328,801
|
|
Cash
and Restricted Cash - End of period
|
614,764
|
642,229
|
1,256,993
|
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements – In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which sets out
principles for the recognition, measurement presentation and
disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessees
and lessors). The standard requires that lessors expense, on an
as-incurred basis, certain indirect initial costs that are not
incremental in negotiating a lease. Under existing standards,
certain of these costs are capitalized and therefore this new
standard may result in certain of these costs being expensed as
incurred after adoption. Under the standard, lessees apply a dual
approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases.
A lessee is required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease
liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months,
regardless of their lease classification. The Company is a lessee
on ground leases at certain purposes, on certain office space
leases and on certain other improvements and equipment. The
standard will impact the accounting and disclosure requirements for
these leases. The standard is effective for the Company under a
modified retrospective approach beginning January 1, 2019. The
Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard
on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 2 - Rental Properties
Rental
properties and depreciable lives are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
-
|
$25,833,373
|
$25,833,373
|
|
Land
Improvements
|
|
2,516,513
|
2,516,513
|
|
Buildings
|
|
25,088,810
|
25,088,810
|
|
Tenant
Improvements
|
|
2,314,529
|
1,993,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Cost
|
|
55,753,225
|
55,431,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Less)
accumulated depreciation
|
|
(3,356,877)
|
(2,700,819)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
rental properties
|
|
$52,396,348
|
$52,731,011
|
(a)
Depreciated over the lesser of the lease term or economic
life.
Total
depreciation charged to operations amounted to $656,058 for the six
months ended June 30, 2018 and $740,649 for the six months ended
June 30, 2017.
Note 3 – Deferred Leasing Costs
Deferred
leasing costs are summarized of follows:
|
|
Basis Of Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing
commissions
|
Lease
Terms
|
$1,247,831
|
$1,248,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Less)
accumulated amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing
commissions
|
|
(590,760)
|
(475,792)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
leasing costs - net
|
|
$657,071
|
$772,220
|
Total
amortization expense charged to operations amounted to $139,254 for
the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $139,474 for the six months
ended June 30, 2017.
Note 4 - Lease Intangibles
Lease
intangible assets are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above-market
leases
|
$1,282,002
|
$1,282,002
|
|
In-place
leases
|
5,278,667
|
5,378,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
cost
|
6,560,669
|
6,660,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Less)
accumulated amortization
|
|
|
|
Above-market
leases (reduction in rental income)
|
(902,819)
|
(701,858)
|
|
In-place
leases (included in amortization expense)
|
(3,107,379)
|
(2,561,015)
|
|
|
(4,010,198)
|
(3,262,873)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
intangible assets - net
|
$2,550,471
|
$3,397,992
|
Total
amortization expense attributable to above-market leases, which is
recorded as a reduction in minimum rent revenue, amounted to
$200,961 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $193,891 for
the six months ended June 30, 2017. Total amortization expense,
attributable to in-place leases amounted to $646,560 for the six
months ended June 30, 2018 and $786,007 for the six months ended
June 30, 2017. Such amounts are included in depreciation and
amortization on the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Future
amortization for lease intangible assets is as
follows:
|
Years Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
(remaining six months)
|
$611,094
|
$200,963
|
$812,057
|
|
2019
|
814,802
|
178,221
|
993,023
|
|
2020
|
228,612
|
-
|
228,612
|
|
2021
|
163,457
|
-
|
163,457
|
|
2022
|
85,779
|
-
|
85,779
|
|
Thereafter
|
267,543
|
-
|
267,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2,171,287
|
$379,184
|
$2,550,471
|
Lease
intangible liabilities consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below
market leases
|
$2,878,751
|
$2,901,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Less)
accumulated accretion (increase in rental income)
|
(1,128,291)
|
(942,999)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
intangible liabilities - net
|
$1,750,460
|
$1,958,035
|
Total
accretion expense of below-market leases, reported as an increase
in minimum rent revenue, amounted to $207,575 for the six months
ended June 30, 2018 and $233,516 for the six months ended June 30,
2017. Future accretion income for lease intangible liabilities is
as follows:
|
Years Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
(remaining six months)
|
$194,918
|
|
2019
|
350,666
|
|
2020
|
211,283
|
|
2021
|
178,042
|
|
2022
|
151,601
|
|
Thereafter
|
663,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,750,460
|
Note 5 – Fair Value
Accounting
standards require certain assets and liabilities be reported at
fair value in the consolidated financial statements and provide a
framework for establishing that fair value. The framework for
determining fair value is based on a hierarchy that prioritizes the
valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair
value.
Fair
values determined by Level 1 inputs use quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has
the ability to access.
Fair
values determined by Level 2 inputs use other inputs that are
observable, either directly or indirectly. These Level 2 inputs
include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets, and other inputs such as interest rates and yield curves
that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. See Note 11 for a
description of the valuation technique and significant inputs used
to value assets and liabilities with Level 2 inputs.
Level
3 inputs are unobservable inputs, including inputs that are
available in situations where there is little, if any, market
activity for the related asset.
In
instances whereby inputs used to measure fair value fall into
different levels of the fair value hierarchy, fair value
measurements in their entirety are categorized based on the lowest
level input that is significant to the valuation. The
Company’s assessment of the significance of particular inputs
to these fair value measurements requires judgment and considers
factors specific to each asset or liability.
Note 6 – Restricted Cash - Funded Reserves
Funded
reserves are as follows:
Lake Mead Partners, LLC
Tenant improvement
reserves: These reserves are
required as a condition precedent of the Nevada State Bank mortgage
loan payable by LM Partners. On acquisition, an account was
established to fund future leasing commissions and tenant
improvements. The funds are released from escrow once approved by
the lender. Additionally, the unfunded balance of the Nevada State
Bank note payable in the amount of $463,000 was funded into the
tenant improvement reserve in 2017. LM Partners is required to fund
a monthly amount of $2,648 to this reserve account and the funded
reserves have been pledged as additional collateral for the Nevada
State Bank mortgage loan.
2700 Ygnacio, LLC
Tenant improvement/lease
commission reserves: On
acquisition, a reserve account in the amount of $500,000 was funded
from the Mutual Bank of Omaha loan proceeds to be used to fund
leasing commissions and tenant improvements approved by the lender.
Ygnacio is not required to fund additional amounts into this
reserve account. The funded reserves have been pledged as
additional collateral for the Mutual Bank of Omaha mortgage
loan.
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Bond service
reserves: These reserves are
required pursuant to the Bond Indenture Agreement, which requires
that 7% of the gross bond proceeds be placed into a reserve account
held by the bond trustee. The bond service reserve may be used to
pay the Company’s bond service obligations and any funds
remaining in the bond service reserve on the second anniversary of
the first bond closing date (October 17, 2016), will be released to
the Company.
Restricted
cash - funded reserves consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant
improvement/lease commission reserves
|
$444,705
|
$761,670
|
|
Bond
service reserve
|
243,124
|
215,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$687,829
|
$977,453
|
Note 7 - Notes Payable
Notes
payable consisted of:
Lake Mead Partners, LLC
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the Property by LM Partners, LM Partners
entered into a loan agreement with Nevada State Bank in the maximum
amount of $30,000,000 of which $29,500,000 (“NP 1”) was
funded on the acquisition of the Property and the unfunded balance
of $500,000 (“NP 2”) was funded into the tenant
improvement reserve, to be used to fund leasing commissions and
tenant improvements approved by the lender. NP 1 and NP 2 are
collectively referred herein as (the “Notes”). In
conjunction with the sale of the 7,790 square foot building to PDCS
(Note 12), LM Partners made a principal payment on the NP 1 loan
reducing the outstanding principal balance by
$2,700,000.
NP
1 bears interest at 4.00% per annum and, effective April 2017, is
payable in monthly principal and interest payments of
$141,904.
NP
2 bears interest at 4.00% per annum and was payable in monthly
interest only payments through November 12, 2017 and thereafter, in
monthly principal and interest payments based on a
twenty-three-year loan amortization period until
maturity.
The
Notes mature on November 12, 2025, at which time the outstanding
principal balance is due. The Notes are secured by the rental
property and a $12,000,000 guarantee by GK Development, Inc. The
Notes may be entirely prepaid subject to a prepayment penalty equal
to 1% of the amount prepaid during the first five years of the term
of the loan. Thereafter, the Notes can be prepaid without a
prepayment penalty. In addition, the Notes are subject to certain
financial covenant measurements.
B.
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Partners, LM
Partners entered into a loan agreement with GK Secured Income IV,
LLC (“GKSI IV”), a related party, in the maximum amount
of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Parent and LM Development.
GKSI IV is managed by the Manager and the Sponsor of the Bonds. At
June 30, 2018, $6,417,483 was owed by LM Parent. At December 31,
2017, $9,538,483 and $394,000 was owed by LM Parent and LM
Development, respectively, aggregating to $9,932,483.
The
loan bears interest at 8.00% per annum and requires monthly
interest only payments until maturity on November 12, 2018. The
loan, which may be partially or entirely prepaid subject to a
prepayment penalty, as further detailed below, is collateralized by
GKIH, LM Parent, and LM Development, granting GKSI IV a security
interest in the right to receive dividends, distributions, and
similar payments. Additionally, 25% of the outstanding principal
balance is guaranteed by GK Development, Inc.
If
the loan is prepaid, which results in GKSI IV being obligated to
pay a Yield Maintenance Fee to the Members of GKSI IV, LM Partners
and LM Development will be obligated to pay to GKSI IV an amount
equal to such Yield Maintenance Fee. If the Yield Maintenance Fee
becomes payable (a) during the first year that the Member holds a
Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an amount equal to 12% per
annum on the Repayment Amounts for the remainder of such year after
the repayment date; (b) during the second year that the Member
holds a Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an amount equal to
13% per annum on the Repayment Amounts for the remainder of such
year after the repayment date;or (c) during the third year that the
Member holds a Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an amount
equal to 14% per annum on the Repayment Amounts for the remainder
of such year after the repayment date.
If
the loan is repaid within the third year (ending November 12,
2018), LM Partners and LM Development would be obligated to pay a
prepayment penalty of approximately $3,341,380. This amount has
been measured as of June 30, 2018, using a 12% per annum rate for
the first year, 13% per annum rate for the second year and a 14%
per annum rate for the third year.
Effective
January 2018, LM Partners commenced repaying the GKSI IV loan out
of the bond proceeds and $3,515,000 has been repaid as of June 30,
2018. It is management’s intention to continue to use the
bond proceeds to repay the entire GKSI IV obligation prior to the
November 12, 2018 maturity date.
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Partners, LM
Partners entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK
Development, Inc., the Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds, in
the maximum amount of $2,608,100. The loan, which bore interest at
7.00% per annum was repaid in 2017.
Lake Mead Development, LLC
A.
Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A.
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Development, LM
Development entered into a mortgage loan agreement with Barrington
Bank & Trust Co., N.A. in the original amount of $2,700,000.
The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75%, for an
effective interest rate of 4.73% and 4.11% per annum at June 30,
2018 and December 31, 2017. Fixed monthly principal payments of
$5,450 is required plus interest, through maturity of the loan on
November 12, 2022. The loan was previously scheduled to mature on
November 12, 2017, however a loan modification agreement was
entered into extending the loan to November 12, 2022, under the
same terms and conditions.
The
loan is secured by the rental property and a personal guarantee by
a member GKIH. The loan may be entirely prepaid without a
prepayment penalty. In addition, the mortgage loan payable is
subject to certain financial covenant measurements.
B.
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
As
noted above, concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property
by LM Development, LM Development entered into a loan agreement
with GKSI IV in the maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated
between LM Parent and LM Development. See above for the terms of
the GKSI IV loan.
In
January 2018, LM Development repaid its outstanding principal
balance of the GKSI IV loan of $394,000.
2700 Ygnacio, LLC:
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the rental property by Ygnacio, Ygnacio
entered into a loan agreement with Mutual of Omaha Bank in the
maximum amount of $11,325,000 of which $10,825,000 was used to fund
the acquisition of the rental property and the balance of $500,000
was used to fund an account to be used to fund leasing commissions
and tenant improvements approved by the lender.
The
loan bears interest at 4.50% per annum and is payable in monthly
principal and interest payments of $63,373. The loan is scheduled
to mature on February 1, 2024, however, the loan can be extended
for an additional three-year period through February 1, 2027 at the
mutual decision of both the borrower and lender, and at an interest
rate to be set on or before December 3, 2023. The loan is secured
by the rental property and a personal guarantee by an affiliate of
one of GKIH’s members. The loan may be entirely prepaid
subject to a prepayment penalty ranging from 0.5% to 2.0% of the
amount prepaid during the first six years of the term of the loan.
Thereafter, the loan can be prepaid without a prepayment penalty.
In addition, the loan is subject to certain financial covenant
measurements.
GK Development, Inc.
On
December 22, 2016, Ygnacio entered into an Assignment of Purchase
and Sale Agreement with GK Development, Inc.
(“Assignment”), pursuant to which GK Development, Inc.
assigned to Ygnacio a Purchase and Sale Agreement, as amended, to
acquire the three-story, Class A office building located at the
corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek,
California. Concurrent with the entry into the Assignment, Ygnacio
entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK Development, Inc.,
the Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds, for an amount of
$855,000. The loan proceeds were used to fund the acquisition
escrow deposit. The loan, which was fully repaid as of December 31,
2017, bore interest, payable monthly, at 7.00% per
annum.
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the rental property by Ygnacio, Ygnacio
entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK Development, Inc.,
in the amount of $1,450,000. This loan, which was fully repaid as
of April 10, 2017, bore interest at 12.00% per annum through March
17, 2017 and 18% per annum thereafter through the re-payment date.
Additionally, Ygnacio was required to pay a financing fee equal to
2% calculated on the amount borrowed.
Notes
payable is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada
State Bank (NP 1)
|
$25,042,610
|
$25,383,306
|
|
Nevada
State Bank (NP 2)
|
492,173
|
500,000
|
|
GK
Secured Income IV, LLC
|
6,417,483
|
9,932,483
|
|
Barrington
Bank & Trust Co. N.A.
|
2,536,500
|
2,569,200
|
|
Mutual
of Omaha Bank
|
10,990,990
|
11,119,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
notes payable
|
$45,479,756
|
$49,504,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis of
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
issuance costs
|
Loan
Terms
|
$1,443,787
|
$1,524,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Less)
Accumulated amortization
|
|
(478,668)
|
(453,369)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
issuance costs - net
|
|
965,119
|
1,071,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable - net
|
|
$44,514,637
|
$48,432,954
|
Total
amortization expense of debt issuance costs charged to operations
amounted to $106,394 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and
$115,865 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Such amounts have
been included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
Future
minimum principal payments are as follows:
|
Years Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
(remaining six months)
|
$6,933,075
|
|
2019
|
1,066,934
|
|
2020
|
1,105,633
|
|
2021
|
1,154,204
|
|
2022
|
3,442,951
|
|
Thereafter
|
31,776,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
$45,479,756
|
Note 8 – Bonds Payable
The
Company is offering 7% unsecured bonds at a purchase price of
$1,000 per bond. The bonds, which bear interest at a fixed rate of
7% per annum, will mature on September 30, 2022. The bonds will
continue to be sold through September 30, 2018 and the Company
intends to continue to use the bond proceeds to pay down existing
indebtedness and to acquire additional commercial rental
properties.
The
bonds are issued under an Indenture Trust Agreement with UMB Bank
as the trustee. The Indenture Trust Agreement places certain
financial covenants on the Company.
Prepayment
penalties for calling the bonds early are as follows: (a) 1.02
times the price to the public ($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or
before September 30, 2019; (b) 1.0015 times the price to the public
($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or after September 30, 2019 but on
or before September 30, 2020;and (b) 1.001 times the price to the
public ($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or after September 30, 2020
but on or before September 30, 2021. See Note 10 for specific
amounts payable to GK Development, Inc., a related party, as
sponsor of the bonds.
As
of June 20, 2018, the Company started a “Volume-Weighted
Discount” to the public. All purchases of Bonds subsequent to
this filing will be subject to a volume-weighted discount to the
price to public ($1,000 per bond) or the discount. The discount
ranges from three to five percent depending on the volume of the
bonds. The bonds shall continue to be denominated in $1,000
increments. Any discounts applied will reduce net proceeds to the
Company.
Bonds
payable is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
Payable
|
$11,948,000
|
$7,113,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis of
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond
Issuance Costs
|
Bond
Term
|
1,154,890
|
679,185
|
|
Bond
Discounts
|
Bond
Term
|
49,780
|
-
|
|
(Less)
Accumulated amortization
|
|
(158,399)
|
(74,383)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
bond issuance and discount costs - net
|
1,046,271
|
604,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
payable - net
|
|
$10,901,729
|
$6,508,198
|
Total
amortization expense of bond issuance costs and bond discounts
charged to operations amounted to $84,015 for the six months ended
June 30, 2018 and $25,661 for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Such amounts have been included in interest expense on the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Note 9 - Operating Leases
The
rental properties have entered into leases with tenants which are
classified as operating leases.
Approximate
minimum base rentals to be received under these operating leases
are as follows:
|
Years Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
(remaining six months)
|
$2,713,204
|
|
2019
|
3,925,182
|
|
2020
|
2,104,174
|
|
2021
|
1,575,336
|
|
2022
|
1,020,717
|
|
Thereafter
|
1,237,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
$12,576,590
|
Several
leases contain provisions for the tenants to pay additional rent to
cover a portion of the Property's real estate taxes and defined
operating expenses.
Lake Mead Partners, LLC
As of June 30, 2018, four tenants currently occupy
69.0% of the portion of the retail power center owned by LM
Partners, representing approximately 27.23% of the future minimum
base rental revenue under leases expiring on various dates between
2019 and 2020. These same
tenants account for 32.39% of minimum rents for the six months
ended June 30, 2018 and 32.26% of minimum rents for the six months
ended June 30, 2017.
Lake Mead Development, LLC
As
of June 30, 2018, two tenants currently occupy 50.7% of the portion
of the power center owned by LM Development, representing
approximately 98.77% of the future minimum base rental revenue
under leases expiring on various dates between 2022 and 2023. These
same tenants account for 7.89% of minimum rents for the six months
ended June 30, 2018 and 7.30% of minimum rents for the six months
ended June 30, 2017.
2700 Ygnacio, LLC
As
of June 30, 2018, two tenants currently occupy 48.16% of the
portion of the office building owned by Ygnacio, representing
approximately 50.32% of the future minimum base rental revenue
under leases expiring on various dates between 2019 and 2021. These
same tenants account for 25.71% of minimum rents for the six months
ended June 30, 2018. Three tenants account for 31.88% of minimum
rents for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Note 10 - Related Party Transactions
Lake
Mead Crossings and Ygnacio are managed by GK Development, Inc., an
affiliate of one of the members of GKIH, under management
agreements that provide for property management fees equal to 3% of
gross monthly revenue collected for Lake Mead Crossings and 5% of
gross monthly revenue collected for Ygnacio. In addition to these
management services, GK Development, Inc. also provides services
relating to the acquisition and disposition of real estate property
and tenant leasing.
GK
Development, Inc. is responsible for promoting the sale of the
bonds and is entitled to receive a fee equal to 1.88% of the
$50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $940,000. In
addition, GK Development is entitled to receive a reimbursement of
organization and offering expenses equal to 0.55% of the
$50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $275,000 and a
reimbursement of Blue-Sky filing fees equal to 0.15% of the
$50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $75,000. In the
aggregate, GK Development, Inc. is entitled to receive 2.58% of the
gross bond proceeds received.
See
Note 7 for the loans payable to (i) GK Development Inc., the
Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds and (ii) GKSI IV, LLC, an
entity managed by the Manager and the Sponsor of the
Bonds.
With
respect to related parties, amounts incurred consisted of the
following:
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2018
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2017
|
|
GK Development, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Management
fees (3% or 5% of gross collections)
|
$108,522
|
$107,454
|
|
Acquisition
fees (2% of the purchase price)
|
-
|
300,000
|
|
Disposition
fees (2% of the selling price)
|
-
|
80,000
|
|
Brokerage
fees (1% of the selling price)
|
-
|
40,000
|
|
Leasing
commissions - capitalized
|
17,759
|
104,052
|
|
Interest
on loans
|
1,544
|
134,272
|
|
Bond
issuance costs
|
123,308
|
318,697
|
|
|
251,133
|
1,084,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
GKSI IV, LLC
|
|
|
|
Interest
on loans
|
318,329
|
395,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$569,462
|
$1,480,160
|
At
June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, $24,717 and $25,857,
respectively, was owed to GK Development, Inc., and is included in
due to affiliates on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
At
June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2017, $44,473 and $67,486,
respectively, was owed to GKSI IV, LLC for unpaid accrued interest,
which is included in accrued interest on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, GKSI IV, LLC was owed
$199,570, at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, for unpaid
accrued loan fees, which is included in accrued financing fees
payable on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Note 11 – Asset Acquisition of Rental Property
On
December 22, 2016, the Company, through Ygnacio, entered into an
assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement
(“Assignment”), with GK Development, Inc., the
Company’s Manager, and Sponsor, pursuant to which GK
Development, Inc. assigned to Ygnacio that certain purchase and
sale agreement, as amended, to acquire a three-story, Class A
office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and
Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California. The acquisition closed on
January 30, 2017 for a purchase price of $14,905,290 (excluding
prorations). The primary reason for the acquisition was to realize
the economic benefit of owning and operating a Class A office
building. The results from the acquisition have been included in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements since that
date.
The
following table summarizes the allocation of the assets and
liabilities acquired at the date of acquisition:
|
Land
and land improvements
|
$10,353,173
|
|
Rental
property and improvements
|
2,066,116
|
|
Leasing
commissions
|
370,705
|
|
Above-market
leases
|
372,258
|
|
In-place
leases
|
1,935,645
|
|
|
15,097,897
|
|
|
|
|
Below-market
leases
|
(192,607)
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash consideration
|
$14,905,290
|
Acquisition
costs attributable to the acquisition of Ygnacio, which include
acquisition fees and other closing fees totaled $369,573 for the
six month period ended June 30, 2017. Such costs have been
capitalized and included in rental properties on the accompany
consolidated balance sheets. The change in the accounting policy
with respect to acquisition costs, results from the Company early
adopting ASU 2017-01 in January 2017 (Note 1).
The
fair value of total identifiable net assets was determined with the
assistance of a third-party appraiser using the income approach
methodology of valuation. The income approach methodology utilizes
the remaining non-cancelable lease terms as defined in lease
agreements, market rental data, and discount rates. This fair
value, is based relying heavily on market observable data such as
rent comparables, sales comparables, and broker indications, which
are Level 2 inputs, as discussed in Note 5. Key assumptions include
a capitalization rate of 7.5%, growth rates for market rentals of
3.0%, and a discount rate of 8.75%. The purchase price was
allocated to the assets acquired based on their relative fair
market value.
Note 12 – Sale of Rental Property
The Company, through LM Partners, entered into a
Purchase and Sale Agreement with Pacific Dental Services, LLC
(“PDCS”), a tenant in the rental property, in terms of
which LM Partners agreed to sell to PDCS the building partially
occupied by PDCS, containing approximately 7,790 leasable square
feet, for $4,000,000 (excluding prorations). The sale closed on
March 20, 2017, resulting in a gain on sale of the rental property
of $1,738,882, which has been included in gain on sale of rental
property on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations
for the six month period ended
June 30, 2017. $2,700,000 of the sale proceeds was used to reduce
the outstanding principal balance on the Nevada State Bank loan and
$980,000 of the sales proceeds was used to reduce the outstanding
principal balance on the GK Development, Inc.
loan.
The
following table summarizes the gain on sale of the rental
property:
|
Sales
price
|
$4,000,000
|
|
Less
Closing costs
|
(381,095)
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds from sale
|
3,618,905
|
|
|
|
|
Less
Net book value of property sold
|
(1,880,023)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
on sale
|
$1,738,882
|
Note 13 – Subsequent Events
As
of June 30, 2018, $11,948,000 of Bonds have been sold and through
September 26, 2018, $19,548,000 have been sold.
The
consolidated financial statements and related disclosures include
evaluation of events up through and including September 26, 2018,
which is the date the consolidated financial statements were
available to be issued.
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Management of GK Development, Inc.
Property Manager of
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Barrington, Illinois
Report on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements
of GK Investment Holdings, LLC, which comprise the consolidated
balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, members’ equity, and
cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial
Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation
of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance
of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair
presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audit in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free from material
misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence
about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due
to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the entity’s
preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial
statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate
in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal
control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used
and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient
and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit
opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of GK Investment Holdings, LLC as of December 31, 2017 and
2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
years then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements,
the Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic
805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The update clarifies the definition of a
business and adds guidance to assist entities with evaluating
whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of
assets or business combinations. Our Opinion is not modified with
respect to this matter.
/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
Denver, Colorado
April 20, 2018
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2017 and 2016
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
Rental
properties
|
$55,431,830
|
$44,329,103
|
|
Less:
Accumulated depreciation
|
2,700,819
|
1,266,411
|
|
|
52,731,011
|
43,062,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
788,301
|
1,187,293
|
|
Accounts
receivable - tenants
|
72,759
|
141,707
|
|
Deferred
rent receivable
|
189,884
|
48,514
|
|
Deferred
leasing costs - Net
|
772,220
|
528,161
|
|
Lease
intangibles - Net
|
3,397,992
|
3,228,195
|
|
Restricted
cash - funded reserves
|
977,453
|
141,508
|
|
Other
receivables - tenant
|
-
|
75,969
|
|
Other
assets
|
124,197
|
1,026,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$59,053,817
|
$49,440,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable - Net
|
$48,432,954
|
$42,995,515
|
|
Bonds
payable - Net
|
6,508,198
|
1,320,126
|
|
Accrued
financing fees payable
|
199,570
|
297,570
|
|
Deferred
rent
|
110,425
|
7,006
|
|
Lease
intangibles - Net
|
1,958,035
|
2,235,743
|
|
Accrued
interest
|
185,765
|
138,211
|
|
Other
accrued liabilities
|
98,504
|
88,289
|
|
Due
to affiliates
|
25,857
|
138,773
|
|
Tenant
security deposits
|
122,803
|
22,450
|
|
Total liabilities
|
57,642,111
|
47,243,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 8 and 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members' Equity
|
|
|
|
Members'
Equity
|
1,411,706
|
2,197,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$59,053,817
|
$49,440,797
|
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
Minimum
rents
|
$5,613,107
|
$3,518,421
|
|
Tenant
recoveries
|
459,198
|
463,548
|
|
Other
rental income
|
-
|
4,055
|
|
|
6,072,305
|
3,986,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
1,149,276
|
480,502
|
|
Insurance
|
93,107
|
46,805
|
|
Management
fees
|
229,570
|
112,918
|
|
Professional
fees
|
141,785
|
81,418
|
|
Real
estate taxes
|
358,111
|
230,806
|
|
Acquisition
and closing costs
|
-
|
3,489
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,399,954
|
2,247,313
|
|
|
5,371,803
|
3,203,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
90
|
8
|
|
Interest
expense
|
(3,238,256)
|
(2,381,086)
|
|
Miscellaneous
income
|
13,374
|
5,106
|
|
Gain
on sale of rental property
|
1,738,882
|
-
|
|
|
(1,485,910)
|
(2,375,972)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Net Loss
|
$(785,408)
|
$(1,593,199)
|
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Members' Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - Beginning of Year
|
$2,197,114
|
$3,790,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Net Loss
|
(785,408)
|
(1,593,199)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - End of Year
|
$1,411,706
|
$2,197,114
|
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Net Loss
|
$(785,408)
|
$(1,593,199)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile consolidated net loss to net cash provided by/(used
in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,399,954
|
2,247,313
|
|
Amortization
of above-market leases
|
394,853
|
307,133
|
|
Accretion
of below-market leases
|
(470,315)
|
(426,299)
|
|
Deferred
rent receivable
|
(141,370)
|
(42,955)
|
|
Gain
on sale of rental property
|
(1,738,882)
|
-
|
|
Amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
229,781
|
192,956
|
|
Amortization
of bond issuance costs
|
72,342
|
2,041
|
|
Changes
in:
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable - tenants
|
68,948
|
(94,498)
|
|
Other
receivables - tenant
|
75,969
|
31,646
|
|
Other
assets
|
(102,439)
|
3,963
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
-
|
(11,954)
|
|
Deferred
rent
|
103,419
|
(38,349)
|
|
Accrued
interest
|
47,554
|
(44,618)
|
|
Other
accrued liabilities
|
10,215
|
37,657
|
|
Due
to affiliates
|
16,084
|
(722,562)
|
|
Tenant
security deposits
|
100,353
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by/(used in) operating activities
|
1,281,058
|
(151,725)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of rental property
|
(14,905,290)
|
(62,999)
|
|
Acquisition
costs incurred
|
(369,574)
|
-
|
|
Additions
to rental properties
|
(217,718)
|
-
|
|
Net
proceeds from sale of rental property
|
3,618,905
|
-
|
|
Payments
of deferred leasing commissions
|
(200,817)
|
(9,315)
|
|
Deposits
for acquisition of rental property
|
1,005,000
|
(1,005,000)
|
|
Net
deposits to restricted cash - funded reserves
|
(835,945)
|
(138,859)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(11,905,439)
|
(1,216,173)
|
|
|
|
|
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
$13,212,000
|
$2,366,484
|
|
Repayment
of notes payable
|
(6,679,100)
|
-
|
|
Principal
payment on notes payable
|
(944,880)
|
(759,655)
|
|
Payment
of financing costs
|
(478,362)
|
(556,000)
|
|
Proceeds
from bonds payable
|
5,658,000
|
1,455,000
|
|
Payment
of bond issue costs
|
(542,269)
|
(136,916)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
10,225,389
|
2,368,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash
|
(398,992)
|
1,001,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash - Beginning of year
|
1,187,293
|
186,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash - End of year
|
$788,301
|
$1,187,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
$2,888,579
|
$2,230,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Investing and Financing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
fees accrued and not paid
|
$-
|
$28,970
|
GK Investment Holdings, LLC
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Description of Business
On September 14, 2015, GK Investment
Holdings, LLC (“GKIH” and/or the
“Company”), a Delaware limited liability company was
formed with the intent to acquire existing income producing
commercial rental properties for the purpose of holding and
operating such properties, and if the need arises, to redevelop the
rental properties for an alternative use other than intended when
originally acquired. However, GKIH is permitted to transact in any
lawful business in addition to that stated above. GKIH anticipates
funding acquisitions in part, by offering to investors the
opportunity to purchase up to a maximum of $50,000,000 of Bonds of
which $7,113,000 and $1,455,000 was sold as of December 31, 2017
and 2016, respectively (Note 9). The Bonds are unsecured
indebtedness of GKIH.
The
members of GKIH have limited liability. Pursuant to the terms of
the Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (the
“Agreement”), the Company will exist in perpetuity
unless terminated as defined in the Agreement. The Company is
managed by GK Development, Inc. (the “Manager” and
“Sponsor of the bonds”), an affiliate of one of the
members of GKIH.
On
October 22, 2015, Lake Mead Parent, LLC (“LM Parent”)
and Lake Mead Development, LLC (“LM Development”), both
Delaware limited liability companies were formed and on October 22,
2015, Lake Mead Partners, LLC (“LM Partners”), a
Delaware limited liability company was formed with LM Parent as its
sole member. On October 21, 2016, 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC
(“Ygnacio”), a Delaware limited liability company was
formed. LM Parent, LM Development and Ygnacio are 100% owned by
GKIH.
The
Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017,
are as follows:
LM
Parent – 100% owned by GKIH; owns 100% of LM
Partners;
LM
Development – 100% owned by GKIH;
2700
Ygnacio, LLC (“Ygnacio”) – 100% owned by
GKIH.
LM
Partners and LM Development were formed to acquire, own, and
operate a retail power center known as Lake Mead Crossing, located
in Henderson, Nevada (the "Lake Mead Crossings"). Lake Mead
Crossings was purchased on November 12, 2015. Prior to the purchase
of Lake Mead Crossings, GKIH had no activity. Ygnacio was formed to
acquire a three-story Class A office building located at the corner
of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California.
Subsequent to year end (January 30, 2017).
The
Lake Mead Crossings was financed as follows:
LM Parent - (i) a first mortgage loan in
the maximum amount of $30,000,000, of which $29,500,000 was funded
upon acquisition; (ii) a mezzanine loan, in the maximum amount of
$10,500,000, allocated between LM Partners and LM Development, of
which $7,210,298 was funded to LM Partners upon acquisition and
(iii) an interim loan from GK Development, Inc. of which $2,608,100
was funded upon acquisition.
LM Development - (i) a first mortgage
loan in the original amount of $2,700,000; (ii) a mezzanine loan,
in the maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Partners
and LM Development, of which $339,702 was funded to LM Development
upon acquisition and (iii) an interim loan from GK Development,
Inc. of which $20,000 was funded upon acquisition.
The
acquisition of Ygnacio was financed with (i) bond proceeds in the
amount of $1,750,000; (ii) a first mortgage loan in the maximum
amount of $11,325,000, of which $500,000 was retained by the lender
to establish a tenant improvement/lease commission escrow reserve;
and (iii) an interim loan from GK Development, Inc. of which
$2,305,000 was funded upon acquisition.
Allocation of Profits and Losses -
Profits or losses from operations of the Company are allocated to
the members of GKIH as set forth in the Agreement. Gains and losses
from the sale, exchange, or other disposition of Company property
will be allocated to the members of GKIH in their ownership
percentages.
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (continued)
Principles of Consolidation - The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant material
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the
consolidation.
Basis of Accounting - The Company
maintains its accounting records and prepares its consolidated
financial statements on an accrual basis, which is in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (“GAAP”).
Classification of Assets and
Liabilities - The financial affairs of the Company
generally do not involve a business cycle since the realization of
assets and the liquidation of liabilities are usually dependent on
the Company’s circumstances. Accordingly, the classification
of current assets and current liabilities is not considered
appropriate and has been omitted from the consolidated balance
sheets.
Estimates - The preparation of
consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Cash and Restricted Cash - The
Company maintains cash and restricted cash balances in federally
insured financial institutions that, from time to time, exceed the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits. The Company believes
that they are not exposed to any significant credit risk on its
cash and restricted cash. Restricted cash consists of tenant
improvement reserves and bond service reserves.
Rental Properties - Land, building,
and other depreciable assets are recorded at cost unless obtained
in a business combination. Depreciation is calculated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets.
The
cost of major additions and betterments are capitalized and repairs
and maintenance which do not improve or extend the life of the
respective assets are charged to operations as incurred. When
property is retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and
accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any
resulting gains or losses are reflected in operations for the
period.
Upon
the acquisition of rental properties, the fair value of the real
estate purchased is allocated to the acquired tangible assets
(consisting of land, buildings and improvements) and acquired
intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above-market and
below-market leases, leasing commissions and acquired in-place
leases). The fair value of the tangible assets of the acquired
property is determined using the income approach methodology of
valuation, which value is then allocated to land, buildings and
improvements based on management’s determination of the
relative fair values of the assets, relying in part, upon an
independent third party appraiser. In valuing an acquired
property’s intangibles, factors considered by management
include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up
periods, and estimates of loss rental revenue during the expected
lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management also
estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing
commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs.
The Company will record a bargain purchase price adjustment if it
determines that the purchase price for the acquired assets is less
than the fair value at the time of acquisition.
Impairment of Assets - The Company
reviews the recoverability of long lived assets including
buildings, equipment, and other intangible assets, when events or
changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying
value of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of
possible impairment is based on the ability to recover the carrying
value of the asset from the expected future pretax cash flows
(undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related
operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of
such assets, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference
between the estimated fair value and the carrying value. The
measurement of impairment requires management to make estimates of
these cash flows related to long lived assets, as well as other
fair value determinations. The Company does not believe that there
are any events or circumstances indicating impairment of its
investments in the rental properties and related long lived assets
as of December 31, 2017, and 2016.
Debt Issuance Costs – Debt
issuance costs represent fees and other third party costs
associated with obtaining financing for the rental properties.
These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis, which
approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the
respective loan agreements. Debt issuance costs are presented on
the consolidated balance sheet as a direct reduction from the
carrying amount of the debt liability. Unamortized costs are
expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before
maturity. Amortization expense is included in interest expense on
the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (Continued)
Bond Issuance Costs – Bond
issuance costs represent underwriting compensation and offering
costs and expenses associated with selling the bonds. These costs
are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the
effective interest method, over the term of the bonds. Bond
issuance costs are presented on the consolidated balance sheet as a
direct reduction from the carrying amount of the bond liability.
Unamortized bond issue costs will be expensed if the bonds are
repaid before maturity (September 30, 2022). Amortization expense
is included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations.
Deferred Leasing Costs – Deferred
leasing costs represent leasing commissions, legal fees and other
third party costs associated with obtaining tenants for the rental
properties. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over
the terms of the respective leases. Amortization expense is
included in depreciation and amortization expense on the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Lease Intangible Assets and Liabilities
– GAAP requires intangible assets and liabilities to be
recognized apart from goodwill if they arise from contractual or
other legal rights (regardless of whether those rights are
transferrable or separable from the acquired entity or from other
rights and obligations).
Upon
acquisition of Lake Mead Crossings, the Company recorded above and
below-market leases based on the present value (using an interest
rate which reflected the risks associated with the leases acquired)
of the difference between (a) the contractual amounts to be paid
pursuant to the in-place leases and (b) the Company estimates of
fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases
measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term
of the lease. These assets and liabilities are being amortized or
accreted on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the
respective tenant leases and the amortization or accretion is being
recorded as an adjustment to rental income.
Upon
acquisition of Lake Mead Crossings, the Company estimated the fair
market value of acquired leasing commissions as the costs the
Company would have incurred to lease Lake Mead Crossings to its
occupancy level at the date of acquisition. Such estimate, which is
included in lease intangibles on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets, includes the fair value of leasing commissions,
legal costs and other third party costs that would be incurred to
lease Lake Mead Crossings to the level at the date of the
acquisition. Such costs are being amortized on a straight-line
basis over the remaining life of the respective tenant leases and
the amortization is being recorded in depreciation and amortization
expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Additionally, the
Company estimated the fair value of acquired in-place lease costs
as the costs the Company would have incurred to lease Lake Mead
Crossings to its occupancy level at the date of acquisition by
evaluating the time period over which such occupancy level would be
achieved and included an estimate of the net operating costs
incurred during lease up. In-place lease costs, which are included
in lease intangibles on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets, are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the
remaining life of the respective tenant leases and the amortization
is being recorded in depreciation and amortization expense on the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Accounts Receivable Tenants and Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts – Tenant receivables are comprised
of billed, but uncollected amounts due for monthly rent and other
charges required pursuant to existing rental lease agreements. An
allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded when a tenant’s
receivable is not expected to be collected. A bad debt expense is
charged when a tenant vacates a space with a remaining unpaid
balance. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, no amounts were reserved
for as an allowance for doubtful accounts. In the event a bad debt
expense is recorded, such amount would be included in other
operating expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Restricted Cash – Funded reserves
consist of (a) funds required to be maintained under the terms of
the various loan agreements, which reserves have been pledged as
additional collateral for the loans requiring funds to be reserved
and (b) bond service reserve to be maintained under the bond
indenture agreement for a period of twelve months commencing from
the first bond closing date (October 17, 2016).
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (Continued)
Rental Revenue – GAAP requires
that the rental income be recorded for the period of occupancy
using the effective monthly rent, which is the average monthly
rental during the term of the lease. Accordingly, rental income is
recognized ratably over the term of the respective leases,
inclusive of leases which provide for scheduled rent increases and
rental concessions. The difference between rental revenue earned on
a straight-line basis and the cash rent due under the provisions of
the lease agreements is recorded as deferred rent receivable on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Rents received in advance
are deferred until they become due and are recorded as deferred
rent in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Additionally,
during the term of their respective leases, tenants pay either (i)
their pro rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, and other
operating expenses (as defined in the underlying lease agreement),
or (ii) a fixed rate for recoveries.
Income Taxes
The Company’s wholly owned
subsidiaries are treated as disregarded entities for federal income
tax reporting purposes and are treated as a component of GKIH for
federal income tax purposes. GKIH is treated as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes and consequently, federal income taxes
are not payable or provided for by the Company. Members of GKIH are
taxed individually on their prorata ownership share of the
Company’s earnings.
GAAP
basis of accounting requires management to evaluate tax positions
taken by the Company and to disclose a tax liability (or asset) if
the Company has taken uncertain positions that more than likely
than not would not be sustained upon examination by the Internal
Revenue Service or other tax authorities. Management has analyzed
the tax positions taken by the Company, and has concluded that as
of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no uncertain tax
positions taken or expected to be taken that would require
disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.
Changes in Accounting
Policies – In
January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-01, “Business
Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a
Business,” and provides further guidance for evaluating
whether a transaction be accounted for as an acquisition of an
asset or a business. ASU 2017-01 is effective for interim annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is
permitted. The new standard is required to be applied prospectively
to transactions occurring after the date of adoption. Under the
ASU, we believe most of our future acquisitions of operating
properties will qualify as asset acquisitions and most future
transaction costs associated with these acquisitions will be
capitalized. As of January 30, 2017, the Company early adopted ASU
2017-01 and the acquisition costs totaling $369,574, related to our
acquisition of Ygnacio, were capitalized.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements – In
May 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with
Customers,” which outlines a comprehensive model for entities
to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with
customers. The standards states that “an entity recognizes
revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to
customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the
entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or
services.” While the standard specifically references
contracts with customers, it may apply to certain other
transactions such as the sale of real estate or equipment. This
standard will not apply to the Company’s recognition of
tenant recoveries until January 1, 2019, when it adopts ASU
2016-02, “Leases (Topic842)”, as discussed below,
however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this standard
to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which sets out
principles for the recognition, measurement presentation and
disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessees
and lessors). The standard requires that lessors expense, on an
as-incurred basis, certain indirect initial costs that are not
incremental in negotiating a lease. Under existing standards,
certain of these costs are capitalized and therefore this new
standard may result in certain of these costs being expensed as
incurred after adoption. Additionally, under this standard, certain
common area maintenance recoveries must be accounted for as a
non-lease component.
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (Continued)
In
November 2017, The FASB decided to proceed with issuing a final
accounting standards update on the new leasing standard, which
would provide additional practical expedients that can be elected
upon adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019. The FASB issued an
exposure draft on January 5, 2018 that includes a practical
expedient that would allow lessors, as an accounting policy
election by class of underlying asset, not to bifurcate non-lease
components from related lease components if certain conditions are
met, and a practical expedient that would enable a cumulative
effect transition option in which acompany would not have to adjust
their comparative financial statements for the effects of the new
standard. The Company plans to utilize the practical expedients
provided by ASU 2016-02 and the final accounting standards update
and will continue to monitor and review updates as they are
provided by the FASB.
In
November 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash
Flows: Restricted Cash,” which requires that a statement of
cash flows explain the change during the period in the total cash,
cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted
cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally
described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should
be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the
beginning of period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the
statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for the Company
beginning January 1, 2019. The adoption of this ASU will impact the
presentation of the consolidated statements of cash flows, as well
as require additional footnote disclosure to reconcile the
consolidated balance sheet to the revised consolidated cash flow
statement presentation.
In
February 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-05, “Other Income –
Gain from the Derecognition of Non-Financial Assets” which
provides guidance on the application of Accounting Standards
Codification (“ASC”) 610-20, specifically on the sale
or transfer of nonfinancial assets and the recognition of revenue
from that sale or transfer of nonfinancial assets. ASU 2017-05 is
effective date for the Company beginning January 1, 2018. The
Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a
significant impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
Note 2 – Rental Properties
Rental
properties and depreciable lives are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
-
|
$25,833,373
|
$15,753,199
|
|
Land
Improvements
|
10
|
2,516,513
|
2,562,407
|
|
Buildings
|
35-40
|
25,088,810
|
25,029,982
|
|
Tenant
Improvements
|
|
1,993,134
|
983,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Cost
|
|
55,431,830
|
44,329,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Less)
accumulated depreciation
|
|
(2,700,819 )
|
(1,266,411)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
rental properties
|
|
$52,731,011
|
$43,062,692
|
(a) Depreciated
over the lesser of the lease term or economic life.
Total
depreciation charged to operations amounted to $1,500,898 and
$1,085,350 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Note 3 – Deferred Leasing Costs
Deferred
leasing costs are summarized of follows:
|
|
Basis Of Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing
commissions
|
Lease
Terms
|
$1,248,012
|
$728,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Less)
accumulated amortization
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing
commissions
|
|
(475,792)
|
(200,192)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
leasing costs - net
|
|
$772,220
|
$528,161
|
Total
amortization expense charged to operations amounted to $304,792 and
$170,853 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Future
amortization for deferred leasing costs is as follows
|
Years Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$255,703
|
|
2019
|
197,596
|
|
2020
|
98,511
|
|
2021
|
72,401
|
|
2022
|
43,696
|
|
Thereafter
|
104,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
$772,220
|
Note 4 – Lease Intangibles
Lease
intangible assets are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above-market
leases
|
$1,282,002
|
$998,730
|
|
In-place
leases
|
5,378,863
|
3,761,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
cost
|
6,660,865
|
4,759,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Less)
accumulated amortization
|
|
|
|
Above-market
leases (reduction in rental income)
|
(701,858)
|
(359,634)
|
|
In-place
leases (included in amortization expense)
|
(2,561,015)
|
(1,172,105)
|
|
|
(3,262,873)
|
(1,531,739)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
intangible assets - net
|
$3,397,992
|
$3,228,195
|
Total
amortization expense attributable to above-market leases, which is
recorded as a reduction in minimum rent revenue, amounted to
$394,853 and $307,133 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and
2016, respectively. Total amortization expense, attributable to
in-place leases amounted to $1,594,264 and $991,110 for the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Such amounts are
included in depreciation and amortization on the accompanying
statements of operations.
Note 4 – Lease Intangibles (continued)
Future
amortization for lease intangible assets is as
follows:
|
Years Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$1,257,655
|
$401,923
|
$1,659,578
|
|
2019
|
814,802
|
178,221
|
993,023
|
|
2020
|
228,612
|
-
|
228,612
|
|
2021
|
163,457
|
-
|
163,457
|
|
2022
|
85,779
|
-
|
85,779
|
|
Thereafter
|
267,543
|
-
|
267,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2,817,848
|
$580,144
|
$3,397,992
|
Lease
intangible liabilities consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below
market leases
|
$2,901,034
|
$2,744,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Less)
accumulated accretion (increase in rental income)
|
(942,999)
|
(508,947)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
intangible liabilities - net
|
$1,958,035
|
$2,235,743
|
Total
accretion expense of below-market leases, reported as an increase
in minimum rent revenue, amounted to $470,315 and $426,299 for the
years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Future
accretion income for lease intangible liabilities is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$402,493
|
|
2019
|
350,666
|
|
2020
|
211,283
|
|
2021
|
178,042
|
|
2022
|
151,601
|
|
Thereafter
|
663,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,958,035
|
Note 5 – Fair Value
Accounting
standards require certain assets and liabilities be reported at
fair value in the consolidated financial statements and provide a
framework for establishing that fair value. The framework for
determining fair value is based on a hierarchy that prioritizes the
valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair
value.
Fair
values determined by Level 1 inputs use quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has
the ability to access.
Fair
values determined by Level 2 inputs use other inputs that are
observable, either directly or indirectly. These Level 2 inputs
include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets, and other inputs such as interest rates and yield curves
that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. See Note 12 for a
description of the valuation technique and significant inputs used
to value assets and liabilities with Level 3
inputs.
Level 3
inputs are unobservable inputs, including inputs that are available
in situations where there is little, if any, market activity for
the related asset.
In
instances whereby inputs used to measure fair value fall into
different levels of the fair value hierarchy, fair value
measurements in their entirety are categorized based on the lowest
level input that is significant to the valuation. The
Company’s assessment of the significance of particular inputs
to these fair value measurements requires judgement and considers
factors specific to each asset or liability.
Note 6 – Restricted Cash - Funded Reserves
Funded
reserves are as follows:
Lake Mead Partners, LLC (“LM Partners”)
Tenant improvement
reserves: These reserves are
required as a condition precedent of the Nevada State Bank mortgage
loan payable by LM Partners. On acquisition, an account was
established to fund future leasing commissions and tenant
improvements. The funds are released from escrow once approved by
the lender. Additionally, the unfunded balance of the Nevada
StateBank note payable in the amount of $463,000 was funded into
the tenant improvement reserve in 2017. LM Partners is required to
fund a monthly amount of $2,648 to this reserve account and the
funded reserves have been pledged as additional collateral for the
Nevada State Bank mortgage loan.
2700 Ygnacio, LLC (“Ygnacio”):
Tenant improvement/lease
commission reserves: On
acquisition, a reserve account in the amount of $500,000 was funded
from the Mutual Bank of Omaha loan proceeds to be used to fund
leasing commissions and tenant improvements approved by the lender.
Ygnacio is not required to fund additional amounts into this
reserve account. The funded reserves have been pledged as
additional collateral for the Mutual Bank of Omaha mortgage
loan.
GK Investment Holdings, LLC:
Bond service
reserves: These reserves are
required pursuant to the Bond Indenture Agreement, which requires
that 7% of the gross bond proceeds be placed into a reserve account
held by the bond trustee. The bond service reserve may be used to
pay the Company’s bond service obligations and any funds
remaining in the bond service reserve on the second anniversary of
the first bond closing date (October 17, 2016), will be released to
the Company.
Restricted
cash - funded reserves consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant
improvement/lease commission reserves
|
$761,670
|
$39,658
|
|
|
215,783
|
101,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$977,453
|
$141,508
|
Note 7 – Other Receivable-Tenant
On
acquisition of the rental property by LM Partners, LM Partners
assumed a receivable owed by one of the tenants Pacific Dental
Services, LLC (“PDCS”). LM Partners sold to PDCS the
building partially occupied by PDCS, containing approximately 7,790
leasable square feet, for $4,000,000 (excluding prorations). See
Note 13. The sale closed on March 20, 2017 and the outstanding
receivable balance was repaid.
Note 8 – Notes Payable
Notes
payable consisted of:
Lake Mead Partners, LLC (“LM Partners”)
A. Nevada State
Bank
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the Property by LM Partners, LM Partners
entered into a loan agreement with Nevada State Bank in the maximum
amount of $30,000,000 of which $29,500,000 (“NP 1”) was
funded on the acquisition of the Property and the unfunded balance
of $500,000 (“NP 2”) was funded into the tenant
improvement reserve, to be used to fund leasing commissions and
tenant improvements approved by the lender. NP 1 and NP 2 are
collectively referred herein as (the “Notes”). In
conjunction with the sale of the 7,790 square foot building to PDCS
(Note 13), LM Partners made a principal payment on the NP 1 loan
reducing the outstanding principal balance by
$2,700,000.
NP
1 bears interest at 4.00% per annum and, effective April 2017, is
payable in monthly principal and interest payments of
$141,904.
NP
2 bears interest at 4.00% per annum and is payable in monthly
interest only payments through November 12, 2017 and thereafter, in
monthly principal and interest payments based on a twentythreeyear
loan amortization period until maturity.
The
Notes mature on November 12, 2025, at which time the outstanding
principal balance is due. The Notes are secured by the rental
property and a $12,000,000 guarantee by GK Development, Inc.. The
Notes may be entirely prepaid subject to a prepayment penalty equal
to 1% of the amount prepaid during the first five years of the term
of the loan. Thereafter, the Notes can be prepaid without a
prepayment penalty. In addition, the Notes are subject to certain
financial covenant measurements.
B.
GK Secured Income IV,
LLC
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Partners, LM
Partners entered into a loan agreement with GK Secured Income IV,
LLC (“GKSI IV”), a related party, in the maximum amount
of $10,500,000, allocated between LM Parent and LM Development.
GKSI IV is managed by the Manager and the Sponsor of the Bonds. At
December 31, 2017, $9,538,483 and $394,000 was owed by LM Parent
and LM Development, respectively, aggregating to $9,932,483 and at
December 31, 2016, $9,538,483 and $440,000 was owed by LM Parent
and LM Development, respectively, aggregating to
$9,978,483.
The
loan bears interest at 8.00% per annum and requires monthly
interest only payments until maturity on November 12, 2018. The
loan, which may be partially or entirely prepaid subject to a
prepayment penalty, as further detailed below, is collateralized by
GKIH, LM Parent, and LM Development, granting GKSI IV a security
interest in the right to receive dividends, distributions, and
similar payments. Additionally, 25% of the outstanding principal
balance is guaranteed by GK Development, Inc.
Note 8 – Notes Payable (continued)
If
the loan is prepaid, which results in GKSI IV being obligated to
pay a Yield Maintenance Fee to the Members of GKSI IV, LM Partners
and LM Development will be obligated to pay to GKSI IV an amount
equal to such Yield Maintenance Fee. If the Yield Maintenance Fee
becomes payable (a) during the first year that the Member holds a
Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an amount equal to 12% per
annum on the Repayment Amounts for the remainder of such year after
the repayment date; (b) during the second year that the Member
holds a Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an amount equal to
13% per annum on the Repayment Amounts for the remainder of such
year after the repayment date; or (c) during the third year that
the Member holds a Unit, the Yield Maintenance Fee will be an
amount equal to 14% per annum on the Repayment Amounts for the
remainder of such year after the repayment date.
If
the loan is repaid within the third year (ending November 12,
2018), LM Partners and LM Development would be obligated to pay a
prepayment penalty of approximately $3,504,000. This amount has
been measured as of December 31, 2017, using a 12% per annum rate
for the first year, 13% per annum rate for the second year and a
14% per annum rate for the third year.
Effective
January 2018, LM Partners commenced repaying the GKSI IV loan out
of the bond proceeds and $1,756,000 has been repaid as of April 20,
2018. It is management’s intention to continue to use the
bond proceeds to repay the entire GKSI IV obligation prior to the
November 12, 2018 maturity date.
C.
GK Development,
Inc.
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Partners, LM
Partners entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK
Development, Inc., the Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds, in
the maximum amount of $2,608,100. The loan bore interest at 7.00%
per annum and was repaid in 2017.
Lake Mead Development, LLC (“LM
Development”)
D.
Barrington Bank &
Trust Co., N.A.
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the rental property by LM Development, LM
Development entered into a mortgage loan agreement with Barrington
Bank & Trust Co., N.A. in the original amount of $2,700,000.
The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75%, for an
effective interest rate of 4.11% and 3.37% per annum at December
31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Fixed monthly principal payments
of $5,450 is required plus interest, through maturity of the loan
on November 12, 2022. The loan was previously scheduled to mature
on November 12, 2017, however a loan modification agreement was
entered into extending the loan to November 12, 2022, under the
same terms and conditions.
The
loan is secured by the rental property and a personal guarantee by
a member GKIH. The loan may be entirely prepaid without a
prepayment penalty. In addition, the mortgage loan payable is
subject to certain financial covenant measurements.
E.
GK Secured Income IV,
LLC
As
noted above, concurrent with the acquisition of the rental property
by LM Development, LM Development entered into a loan agreement
with GKSI IV in the maximum amount of $10,500,000, allocated
between LM Parent and LM Development. See above for the terms of
the GKSI IV loan.
In
January 2018, LM Development repaid its outstanding principal
balance of the GKSI IV loan of $394,000.
Note 8 – Notes Payable (continued)
2700 Ygnacio, LLC (“Ygnacio”)
F)
Mutual of Omaha
Bank\
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the rental property by Ygnacio, Ygnacio
entered into a loan agreement with Mutual of Omaha Bank in the
maximum amount of $11,325,000 of which $10,825,000 was used to fund
the acquisition of the rental property and the balance of $500,000
was used to fund an account to be used to fund leasing commissions
and tenant improvements approved by the lender.
The
loan bears interest at 4.50% per annum and is payable in monthly
principal and interest payments of $63,373. The loan is scheduled
to mature on February 1, 2024, however, the loan can be extended
for an additional three-year period through February 1, 2027 at the
mutual decision of both the borrower and lender, and at an interest
rate to be set on or before December 3, 2023. The loan is secured
by the rental property and a personal guarantee by an affiliate of
one of GKIH’s members. The loan may be entirely prepaid
subject to a prepayment penalty ranging from 0.5% to 2.0% of the
amount prepaid during the first six years of the term of the loan.
Thereafter, the loan can be prepaid without a prepayment penalty.
In addition, the loan is subject to certain financial covenant
measurements.
GK Development, Inc.
On
December 22, 2016, Ygnacio entered into an Assignment of Purchase
and Sale Agreement with GK Development, Inc.
(“Assignment”), pursuant to which GK Development, Inc.
assigned to Ygnacio a Purchase and Sale Agreement, as amended, to
acquire the three-story, Class A office building located at the
corner of North Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek,
California. Concurrent with the entry into the Assignment, Ygnacio
entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK Development, Inc.,
the Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds, for an amount of
$855,000. The loan proceeds were used to fund the acquisition
escrow deposit. The loan, which was fully repaid as of December 31,
2017, bore interest, payable monthly, at 7.00% per
annum.
Concurrent
with the acquisition of the rental property by Ygnacio, Ygnacio
entered into an unsecured loan agreement with GK Development, Inc.,
in the amount of $1,450,000. This loan, which was fully repaid as
of April 10, 2017, bore interest at 12.00% per annum through March
17, 2017 and 18% per annum thereafter through the re-payment date.
Additionally, Ygnacio was required to pay a financing fee equal to
2% calculated on the amount borrowed.
Notes
payable is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada
State Bank (NP 1)
|
$25,383,306
|
$28,757,262
|
|
Nevada
State Bank (NP 2)
|
500,000
|
63,000
|
|
GK
Secured Income IV, LLC
|
9,932,483
|
9,978,483
|
|
Barrington
Bank & Trust Co. N.A.
|
2,569,200
|
2,634,600
|
|
Mutual
of Omaha Bank
|
11,119,475
|
-
|
|
GK
Development, Inc.
|
-
|
2,483,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
notes payable
|
$49,504,464
|
$43,916,445
|
|
|
Basis of Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
issuance costs
|
Loan
Terms
|
$1,524,879
|
$1,144,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Less)
Accumulated amortization
|
|
(453,369)
|
(223,588)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
issuance costs - net
|
|
1,071,510
|
920,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable - net
|
|
$48,432,954
|
$42,995,515
|
Total
amortization expense of debt issuance costs charged to operations
amounted to $229,781 and $192,956 for the years ended December 31,
2017 and 2016, respectively. Such amounts have been included in
interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Future
minimum principal payments are as follows:
|
Years Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$10,957,783
|
|
2019
|
1,066,934
|
|
2020
|
1,105,633
|
|
2021
|
1,154,204
|
|
2022
|
3,442,951
|
|
Thereafter
|
31,776,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
$49,504,464
|
Note 9 – Bonds Payable
The
Company is offering 7% unsecured bonds at a purchase price of
$1,000 per bond. The bonds, which bear interest at a fixed rate of
7% per annum, will mature on September 30, 2022. The bonds will
continue to be sold through September 30, 2018 and the Company
intends to use the bond proceeds to pay down existing indebtedness
and to acquire additional commercial rental
properties.
The
bonds are issued under an Indenture Trust Agreement with UMB Bank
as the trustee. The Indenture Trust Agreement places certain
financial covenants on the Company.
Prepayment
penalties for calling the bonds early are as follows: (a) 1.02
times the price to the public ($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or
before September 30, 2019; (b) 1.0015 times the price to the public
($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or after September 30, 2019 but on
or before September 30, 2020; and (b) 1.001 times the price to the
public ($1,000 per bond) if redeemed on or after September 30, 2020
but on or before September 30, 2021. See Note 11 for specific
amounts payable to GK Development, Inc., a related party, as
sponsor of the bonds.
Bonds
payable is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
Payable
|
$7,113,000
|
$1,455,000
|
|
|
Basis of Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond
Issuance Costs
|
Bond
Term
|
679,185
|
136,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Less)
Accumulated amortization
|
|
(74,383)
|
(2,041)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
bond issuance costs - net
|
|
604,802
|
134,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
payable - net
|
|
$6,508,198
|
$1,320,126
|
Total
amortization expense of bond issuance costs charged to operations
amounted to $72,342 and $2,041 for the years ended December 31,
2017 and 2016, respectively which amounts have been included in
interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Note 10 – Operating Leases
The
rental properties have entered into leases with tenants which are
classified as operating leases.
Approximate minimum
base rentals to be received under these operating leases are as
follows:
|
Years Ending December 31
|
|
|
2018
|
$5,374,536
|
|
2019
|
3,888,707
|
|
2020
|
2,070,247
|
|
2021
|
1,575,336
|
|
2022
|
1,020,717
|
|
Thereafter
|
1,226,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
$15,156,122
|
Several
leases contain provisions for the tenants to pay additional rent to
cover a portion of the Property's real estate taxes and defined
operating expenses.
Lake Mead Partners, LLC
As
of December 31, 2017, four tenants currently occupy 68.96% of the
portion of the retail power center owned by LM Partners,
representing approximately 16.08% of the future minimum base rental
revenue under leases expiring on various dates between 2019 and
2020. These same tenants account for 31.18% and 49.39% of the
minimum rents for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Lake Mead Development, LLC
As
of December 31, 2017, two tenants currently occupy 50.73% of the
portion of the power center owned by LM Development, representing
approximately 14.24% of the future minimum base rental revenue
under leases expiring on various dates between 2022 and 2023. These
same tenants account for 7.04% and 31.07% of the minimum rents for
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
2700 Ygnacio, LLC
As
of December 31, 2017, two tenants currently occupy 49.48% of the
portion of the office building owned by Ygnacio, representing
approximately 21.51% of the future minimum base rental revenue
under leases expiring on various dates between 2019 and 2021. These
same tenants account for 22.53% and 0% of the minimum rents for the
years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Note 11 – Related Party Transactions
Lake
Mead Crossings and Ygnacio are managed by GK Development, Inc., an
affiliate of one of the members of GKIH, under management
agreements that provide for property management fees equal to 3% of
gross monthly revenue collected for Lake Mead Crossings and 5% of
gross monthly revenue collected for Ygnacio. In addition to these
management services, GK Development, Inc. also provides services
relating to the acquisition and disposition of real estate property
and tenant leasing.
GK
Development, Inc. is responsible for promoting the sale of the
bonds and is entitled to receive a fee equal to 1.88% of the
$50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $940,000. In
addition, GK Development is entitled to receive a reimbursement of
organization and offering expenses equal to 0.55% of the
$50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $275,000 and a
reimbursement of Blue-Sky filing fees equal to 0.15% of the
$50,000,000 gross bond proceeds received up to $75,000. In the
aggregate, GK Development, Inc. is entitled to receive 2.58% of the
gross bond proceeds received.
See
Note 8 for the loans payable to (i) GK Development Inc., the
Manager, and the Sponsor of the Bonds and (ii) GKSI IV, LLC, an
entity managed by the Manager and the Sponsor of the
Bonds.
With
respect to related parties, amounts incurred consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management
fees (3% or 5% of gross collections)
|
$229,570
|
$112,918
|
|
Acquisition
fees (2% of the purchase price)
|
300,000
|
-
|
|
Disposition
fees (2% of the selling price)
|
80,000
|
-
|
|
Brokerage
fees (1% of the selling price)
|
40,000
|
-
|
|
Leasing
commissions - capitalized
|
178,939
|
9,315
|
|
Interest
on loans
|
164,068
|
114,279
|
|
|
145,976
|
37,539
|
|
|
1,138,553
|
274,051
|
|
GKSI IV,
LLC
|
|
|
|
Interest
on loans
|
797,434
|
791,910
|
|
|
-
|
28,970
|
|
|
797,434
|
820,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,935,987
|
$1,094,931
|
At
December 31, 2017 and 2016, $25,857 and $67,769, respectively, was
owed to GK Development, Inc., and is included in due to affiliates
on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Such amounts are
in addition to the loan amount owed to GK Development, Inc., as
discussed in Note 8.
At
December 31, 2017 and 2016, $67,486 and $67,769, respectively, was
owed to GKSI IV, LLC for unpaid accrued interest, which is included
in accrued interest on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. Additionally, GKSI IV, LLC was owed $199,570 at December
31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for unpaid accrued loan fees,
which is included in accrued financing fees payable on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Note 12 – Asset Acquisition
of Rental Property –
On
December 22, 2016, the Company, through Ygnacio, entered into an
assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement
(“Assignment”), with GK Development, Inc., the
Company’s Manager, and Sponsor, pursuant to which GK
Development, Inc. assigned to Ygnacio that certain purchase and
sale agreement, as amended, to acquire a three-story, Class A
office building located at the corner of North Via Monte and
Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California. The acquisition closed on
January 30, 2017 for a purchase price of $14,905,290 (excluding
prorations). The primary reason for the acquisition was to realize
the economic benefit of owning and operating a Class A office
building. The results from the acquisition have been included in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements since that
date.
The
following table summarizes the allocation of the assets and
liabilities acquired at the date of acquisition:
|
Land
and land improvements
|
$10,353,173
|
|
Rental
property and improvements
|
2,066,116
|
|
Leasing
commissions
|
370,705
|
|
Above-market
leases
|
372,258
|
|
In-place
leases
|
1,935,645
|
|
|
15,097,897
|
|
|
|
|
Below-market
leases
|
(192,607)
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash consideration
|
$14,905,290
|
Acquisition
costs attributable to the acquisition of Ygnacio, which include
acquisition fees and other closing fees totaled $369,574 for the
year ended December 31, 2017. Such costs have been capitalized and
included in rental properties on the accompany consolidated balance
sheets. Acquisition costs of $3,489, attributable to the
acquisition of Lake Mead Crossings, incurred during the year ended
December 31, 2016 were charged to expense and are included on the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The change in
the accounting policy with respect to acquisition costs, results
from the Company early adopting ASU 2017-01 in January 2017 (Note
1).
The
fair value of total identifiable net assets was determined with the
assistance of a third-party appraiser using the income approach
methodology of valuation. The income approach methodology utilizes
the remaining non-cancelable lease terms as defined in lease
agreements, market rental data, and discount rates. This fair
value, is based relying heavily on market observable data such as
rent comparables, sales comparables, and broker indications, which
are Level 2 inputs, as discussed in Note 5. Key assumptions include
a capitalization rate of 7.5%, growth rates for market rentals of
3.0%, and a discount rate of 8.75%. The purchase price was
allocated to the assets acquired based on their relative fair
market value.
Note 13 – Sale of Rental Property
The
Company, through LM Partners, entered into a Purchase and Sale
Agreement with Pacific Dental Services, LLC (“PDCS”), a
current tenant in the rental property, in terms of which LM
Partners agreed to sell to PDCS the building partially occupied by
PDCS, containing approximately 7,790 leasable square feet, for
$4,000,000 (excluding prorations). The sale closed on March 20,
2017, resulting in a gain on sale of the rental property of
$1,738,882, which has been included in gain on sale of rental
property on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2017. $2,700,000 of the sale
proceeds was used to reduce the outstanding principal balance on
the Nevada State Bank loan and $980,000 of the sales proceeds was
used to reduce the outstanding principal balance on the GK
Development, Inc. loan.
The
following table summarizes the gain on sale of the rental
property:
|
Sales
price
|
$4,000,000
|
|
Less
Closing costs
|
(381,095)
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds from sale
|
3,618,905
|
|
|
|
|
Less
Net book value of property sold
|
(1,880,023)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
on sale
|
$1,738,882
|
Note 14 – Subsequent Events
As
of December 31, 2017, $7,113,000 of Bonds have been sold and
through April 20, 2018, $9,323,000 have been sold.
The
consolidated financial statements and related disclosures include
evaluation of events up through and including April 20, 2018, which
is the date the consolidated financial statements were available to
be issued.
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Management of GK Development, Inc.
Property Manager of
2700 Ygnacio Partners
Barrington, Illinois
Report on the Financial Statement
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenues and certain
operating expenses of 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC for the year ended
December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial
statement.
Management’s Responsibility for the Financial
Statement
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation
of this financial statement in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. this
includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal
control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of this
statement of revenues and certain operating expenses that is free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the statement of
revenues and certain operating expenses based on our audit. We
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the statement of revenues and certain operating
expenses is free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence
about the amounts and disclosures in the statement of revenues and
certain operating expenses. The procedures selected depend on the
auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of
material misstatement of the statement of revenues and certain
operating expenses, whether due to fraud or error. In making those
risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant
to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the
statement of revenues and certain operating expenses in order to
design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances,
but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly,
we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness
of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the statement of revenues
and certain operating expenses.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient
and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit
opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the statement of revenues and certain operating
expenses referred to above presents fairly, in all material
respects, the revenue and certain operating expenses described in
Note 1 to the financial statement of 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC for
the year ended December 31, 2016, in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Basis of Accounting
As described in Note 1 to the financial statement, the statement of
revenues and certain operating expenses has been prepared for the
purpose of complying with the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not intended to be a
complete presentation of 2700 Ygnacio Partners, LLC’s
revenues and expenses. Our opinion is not modified with respect to
this matter.
/s/ Eide Bailly LLP
Denver, Colorado
September 27, 2017
Statement of Revenues and Certain Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Minimum
rents
|
$2,271,736
|
|
Tenant
recoveries
|
40,850
|
|
|
2,312,586
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
Other operating
expenses
|
677,045
|
|
Real estate
taxes
|
164,545
|
|
Insurance
|
89,891
|
|
|
931,481
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
in excess of certain operating expenses
|
$1,381,105
|
(See
accompanying notes to financial statement)
Note
1 – Basis of Presentation
Pacific
2700 Ygnacio Corporation, or the Seller, owned and operated a
three-story, Class A office building located at the corner of North
Via Monte and Ygnacio Road in Walnut Creek, California (the
"Property"). The Property was sold to a wholly owned subsidiary of
GK Investment Holdings, LLC (“GKIH”), or the Purchaser.
The property is comprised of 107,970 rentable square feet of which
approximately 90% is leased to numerous tenants under leases
expiring on various dates between 2017 and 2022. The Purchaser
purchased the Property on January 30, 2017, and assumed all
management and ownership responsibilities.
The
accompanying statement of revenues and certain direct operating
expenses has been prepared in accordance with Rule 8-06 of
Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities act of 1933, as
amended. Accordingly, the statement is not representative of the
actual operations for the period presented as revenues and certain
operating expenses, which may not be directly attributable to the
revenues and expenses expected to be incurred in future operations
of the Property, have been excluded. Such items include
depreciation, amortization, management fees, interest expense,
amortization of in-place leases, and amortization of above and
below market leases. Other operating expenses include
administrative and maintenance salaries, cleaning, landscaping,
utilities and repairs and maintenance.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Estimates - The preparation of this
financial statement in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that may affect the amounts reported
in the financial statement and related notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Rental Recognition – The
Property’s leases with tenants are classified as operating
leases. Rental income is recognized ratably over the term of the
respective leases, inclusive of leases which provide for scheduled
rent increases and rental concessions. Straight line rent
adjustment included in minimum rents, reflected an increase in
rental revenue on the statement of revenue and certain direct
operating expenses in the amount of $122,151 for the year ended
December 31, 2016.
Tenant Recoveries - During the term of
their respective leases, certain of the tenants pay a pro rata
share of real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses
(as defined), over a base year. Estimated recoveries are recognized
as revenue in the period the applicable expenses are
incurred.
Note 3 – Lease
The
Seller has entered into non-cancellable operating leases with
tenants with various escalation terms as stated in the lease
agreements. These leases have various expiration dates through
February 28, 2022.
Approximate minimum
base rentals to be received under these operating leases are as
follows:
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
$2,260,318
|
|
2018
|
1,840,233
|
|
2019
|
1,593,056
|
|
2020
|
525,967
|
|
2021
|
348,453
|
|
Thereafter
|
11,223
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$6,579,250
|
As of
December 31, 2016, three tenants currently occupy 64.90% of the
office building, under leases expiring on various dates between
2017 and 2021. These same tenants account for 77.16% of minimum
rents for the year ended December 31, 2016
Note 4 – Subsequent Events
Subsequent events
were evaluated through September 27, 2017, the date the financial
statement was available to be issued.
Appendix A
PRIOR PERFORMANCE TABLES
As used herein, the terms “we”, “our” and
“us” refer to GK Investment Holdings, LLC.
The
following Prior Performance Tables, or Tables, provide information
relating to real estate investment programs sponsored by GK
Development, Inc., or GK Development, or Prior Real Estate
Programs, through December 31, 2016. All of the Prior Real Estate
Programs presented in the Tables or otherwise discussed in the
section entitled “Prior Performance Summary” in this
Offering Circular are private programs that have no public
reporting requirements. GK Development has not previously sponsored
a public program.
As of
December 31, 2016, GK Development was the sponsor of seven private
programs that had closed offerings in the prior five years; none of
which had investment objectives similar to our company. Of the
seven prior private programs that closed offerings within the prior
five years, we do not believe that any of them had similar
investment objectives to our company because: (i) four of the
programs were equity programs designed to invest in a single,
identified asset and (ii) the remaining three programs were notes
programs designed to make loans to identified affiliates of GK
Development.
GK
Development is responsible for the acquisition, financing,
operation, maintenance and disposition of our investments. Key
members of the management of GK Development will play a significant
role in the promotion of this offering and the operation of our
company. The financial results of the Prior Real Estate Programs
may provide some indication of GK Development’s ability to
perform its obligations. However, general economic conditions
affecting the real estate industry and other factors contribute
significantly to financial results.
As an investor in our Bonds, you will not own any interest in the
Prior Real Estate Programs and should not assume that you will
experience returns, if any, comparable to those experienced by
investors in the Prior Real Estate Programs.
The
following tables are included herein:
●
Table I
- Experience in Raising and Investing Funds;
●
Table
II - Compensation to Sponsor;
●
Table
III - Operating Results of Prior Programs; and
●
Table
IV - Results of Completed Programs.
The
information in these tables should be read together with the
summary information under “Prior Performance Summary”
in this Offering Circular.
TABLE I
EXPERIENCE IN RAISING AND INVESTING FUNDS
This
Table I sets forth a summary of experience of GK Development, Inc.
in raising and investing funds in Prior Real Estate Programs; the
offerings of which have closed in the three years ended December
31, 2017. None of the Prior Real Estate Programs presented in this
Table I have similar or identical investment objectives to GK
Investment Holdings, LLC. Information is provided with regard to
the manner in which the proceeds of the offerings have been
applied. Also set forth is information pertaining to the timing and
length of these offerings and the time period over which the
proceeds have been invested in the properties. All figures are as
of December 31, 2017.
|
|
GK Secured Income Investments III,
LLC
|
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
|
|
GK DST - Cedar Falls Grocery (Unaudited Tax
Basis)
|
|
Dollar
amount offered (in thousands)
|
$11,200
|
$11,000
|
$10,000
|
$5,076
|
|
Dollar
amount raised (100%)
|
$11,112
|
$11,280
|
$9,836
|
$5,076
|
|
Less
offering expenses (percentage):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling
commissions and discounts retained by affiliates
|
5.88%
|
8.17%
|
7.18%
|
9.79%
|
|
Organizational
expenses
|
1.73%
|
0.96%
|
2.82%
|
2.42%
|
|
Other
(Syn, Mgmy., Mkting, Underwriting)
|
1.20%
|
0.00%
|
0.27%
|
0.00%
|
|
Percent available
for investment
|
91.20%
|
90.87%
|
89.73%
|
87.79%
|
|
Acquisition
costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid items and
fees related to purchase of property
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Cash down payment
for assets
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Acquisition
fees
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Other (please
explain)
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Total acquisition
cost (in thousands)
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Percent leverage
(mortgage financing divided by total acquisition cost)
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
|
Date
offering began
|
|
10/1/15
|
7/30/15
|
7/10/16
|
|
Length
of offering (months)
|
10
|
6
|
14
|
12
|
|
Months
to invest 90% of amount available for investment (measured from
beginning of offering
|
7
|
3
|
11
|
12
|
TABLE II
COMPENSATION TO SPONSOR
This
Table II sets forth the types of compensation received by GK
Development, Inc., and its affiliates, including compensation paid
out of offering proceeds and compensation paid in connection with
ongoing operations, in connection with six programs; the offerings
of which have closed in the three years ended December 31, 2017.
None of the Prior Real Estate Programs presented in this Table II
have similar or identical investment objectives to GK Investment
Holdings, LLC. All figures are as of December 31,
2017.
Types of Compensation
|
|
GK Secured Income Investments III, LLC
|
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
|
|
GK DST - Cedar Falls Grocery (Unaudited Tax
Basis)
|
|
Date
offering commenced
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
amount raised (in thousands)
|
$11,112
|
$11,280
|
$9,836
|
$5,076
|
|
Amount
paid to sponsor from proceeds of offering:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
fees
|
$115
|
$0
|
$22
|
$0
|
|
Syndication Mgmnt
Fee
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Acquisition
fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
– real
estate commissions
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
–
advisory fees
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
– other
(property acquisition fee)
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Other
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Dollar amount of
cash generated from operations before deducting payments to sponsor
(in thousands)
|
$2,623
|
$1,450
|
$2,318
|
$699
|
|
Amount paid to
sponsor from operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property management
fees
|
$0
|
$0
|
$344
|
$43
|
|
Partnership
management fees
|
$0
|
$0
|
$86
|
$27
|
|
Reimbursements
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Leasing
commissions
|
$0
|
$0
|
$158
|
$0
|
|
Specialty Lease
Commissions
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Other (Structuring
Fee)
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Other (Guarantee
Fee)
|
$0
|
$0
|
$309
|
$0
|
|
Other (Loan
Management Fee)
|
$170
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Other (Loan
Origination Fee)
|
$100
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Other (LLC
Management Fee)
|
$0
|
$0
|
$140
|
$0
|
|
Dollar amount of
property sales and refinancing before deducting payments to sponsor
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
cash
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
–
notes
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Amount paid to
sponsor from property sales and refinancing (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
commissions
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Incentive
fees
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Other (Disposition
Fee)
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
TABLE III
ANNUAL OPERATING RESULTS OF PRIOR REAL ESTATE PROGRAMS
This
Table III sets forth the annual operating results of Prior Real
Estate Programs sponsored by GK Development, Inc. and its
affiliates that have closed offerings during the five years ended
December 31, 2017. None of the Prior Real Estate Programs presented
in this Table III have similar or identical investment objectives
to GK Investment Holdings, LLC. All figures are for the period
commencing January 1 of the year acquired, except as otherwise
noted.
Operating Results of Prior Programs
|
|
|
GK Preferred Income Investments I (Lakeview Square),
LLC
|
GK Secured Income Investments I, LLC
|
GK Secured Income Investments III, LLC
|
GK Preferred Income II (Ridgmar), LLC
|
GK Secured Income IV, LLC
|
|
GK DST - Cedar Falls Grocery (Unaudited Tax Basis)
|
|
Gross Revenues
(in thousands)
|
|
$22,180
|
$3,489
|
$3,279
|
$5,454
|
$1,848
|
$8,904
|
$1,487
|
|
Profit on sale
of properties (in thousands)
|
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Less (in
thousands):
|
Operating
expenses
|
$13,775
|
$574
|
$566
|
$2,013
|
$648
|
$4,750
|
$323
|
|
Interest
expense
|
$2,189
|
$5
|
$0
|
$6,567
|
$0
|
$2,496
|
$440
|
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
$3,451
|
$0
|
$0
|
$291
|
$0
|
$3,692
|
$25
|
|
Net Income
– GAAP Basis (in thousands)
|
|
$2,765
|
$2,910
|
$2,713
|
$(3,417)
|
$1,200
|
$(2,034)
|
$699
|
|
Taxable Income
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
from operations
|
|
$3,413
|
$2,793
|
$2,730
|
$(5,180)
|
$1,543
|
$(454)
|
$699
|
|
–
from gain on sales
|
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Cash generated
from operations
|
|
$5,739
|
$2,791
|
$2,623
|
$(8,267)
|
$1,450
|
$2,318
|
$699
|
|
Cash generated
from sales
|
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Cash generated
from refinancing
|
|
$4,013
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Cash generated
from operations, sales and refinancing (in
thousands)
|
|
$9,752
|
$2,791
|
$2,623
|
$(8,267)
|
$1,450
|
$2,318
|
$699
|
|
Less (in
thousands):
|
Cash
distributions to investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
from operating cash flow
|
$4,981
|
$2,674
|
$2,623
|
$0
|
$1,522
|
$1,114
|
$449
|
|
–
from sales and refinancing
|
$4,013
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
–
from other
|
$495
|
$24
|
$226
|
$5,055
|
$110
|
$4
|
$34
|
|
Cash generated
(deficiency) after cash distributions (in
thousands)
|
|
$263
|
$93
|
$(226)
|
$(13,322)
|
$(182)
|
$1,200
|
$216
|
|
Less:
|
Special items
(not including sales and refinancing) (identify and
quantify)
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Cash generated
(deficiency) after cash distributions and special items (in
thousands)
|
|
$263
|
$93
|
$(226)
|
$(13,322)
|
$(182)
|
$1,200
|
$216
|
|
Tax and Distribution Data Per $1,000 Invested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Income
Tax Results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary
income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
from operations
|
|
$0.66
|
$0.38
|
$0.25
|
$(0.22)
|
$0.14
|
$(0.05)
|
$0.09
|
|
–
from recapture
|
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
|
Capital
gain (loss)
|
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
|
Cash
Distributions to Investors Source (on GAAP basis) (in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
Investment income
|
|
$4,312
|
$2,698
|
$2,849
|
$0
|
$1,632
|
$1,118
|
$483
|
|
–
Return of capital
|
|
$5,177
|
$0
|
$0
|
$5,055
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
Source
(on cash basis) (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
Sales
|
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
–
Refinancing
|
|
$4,013
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
–
Operations
|
|
$4,981
|
$2,077
|
$2,623
|
$0
|
$1,522
|
$1,114
|
$449
|
|
–
Other
|
|
$495
|
$24
|
$226
|
$5,055
|
$110
|
$4
|
$34
|
|
Amount (in
percentage terms) remaining invested in program properties at the
end of the last year reported in the Table (original total
acquisition cost of properties retained divided by original total
acquisition cost of all properties in program)
|
0.00%
|
100.00%
|
0.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
100.00%
|
TABLE IV
RESULTS OF COMPLETED PROGRAMS
This
Table IV sets forth the operating results of Prior Real Estate
Programs sponsored by GK Development, Inc. and its affiliates that
have completed during the five years ended December 31, 2016. None
of the Prior Real Estate Programs presented in this Table IV have
similar or identical investment objectives to GK Investment
Holdings, LLC.
Results of Completed Programs
|
Program Name
|
Grand Center Partners (Unaudited - Tax Basis)
|
GDH Investments (North Ave) (Unaudited - Tax
Basis)
|
GK Preferred Income Investments I (Lakeview Square),
LLC
|
|
Dollar
Amount Raised (in thousands)
|
$2,410
|
$2,000
|
$5,450
|
|
Number
of Properties Purchased
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
1
|
|
Date
of Closing of Offering
|
|
|
|
|
Date of First Sale
of Property
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Final Sale
of Property
|
|
|
|
|
Tax and
Distribution Data Per $1,000 Investment Through… (in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Income Tax
Results:
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary
income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
–
from operations
|
$0.04
|
$(0.15)
|
$0.66
|
|
–
from recapture
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
|
Capital Gain
(loss)
|
$0.28
|
$0.70
|
$0.00
|
|
Deferred
Gain
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
|
Ordinary
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
$0.00
|
|
Cash Distributions
to Investors (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Source (on
GAAP basis)
|
|
|
|
|
–
Investment income
|
$814
|
$1,123
|
$4,312
|
|
–
Return of capital
|
$2,410
|
$2,000
|
$5,177
|
|
Source (on cash
basis)
|
|
|
|
|
–
Sales
|
$2,604
|
$2,890
|
$0
|
|
–
Refinancing
|
$0
|
$0
|
$4,013
|
|
–
Operations
|
$620
|
$233
|
$4,981
|
|
–
Other
|
$0
|
$0
|
$495
|
|
Receivables on Net
Purchase Money Financing (in thousands)
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
PART III - EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managing
Broker-Dealer Agreement by and between JCC Advisors, LLC and our
company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (1)(a) to the
Company’s Third Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering
Statement on Form 1-A filed on June 30, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Participating Dealer Agreement, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit (1)(b) to the Company’s Third Pre-Qualification
Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on June 30,
2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Wholesaling Dealer Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(1)(c) to the Company’s Third Pre-Qualification Amendment to
its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on June 30,
2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Amendment to Managing Broker-Dealer Agreement by and between JCC
Advisors, LLC and our company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(1)(d) to the Company’s Fourth Pre-Qualification Amendment to
its Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed on September 22,
2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate
of Formation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(2)(a) to the Company’s Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed
on December 23, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited
Liability Company Agreement of the Company, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit (2)(b) to the Company’s First
Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A
filed on February 18, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indenture
between our company and the trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 6.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed
on October 6, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Supplemental Indenture between our company and the trustee,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 1-U filed on November 22, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form of
Unsecured Bond, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(b) to the
Company’s Fourth Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering
Statement on Form 1-A filed on September 22, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription
Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4) to the
Company’s Second Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering
Statement on Form 1-A filed on May 5, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forced
Sale Agreement among our company, the trustee and 1551 Kingsbury
Partners, L.L.C, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.3 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6,
2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forced
Sale Agreement among our company, the trustee, and GKPI I Partners
(Lakeview Square), LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.4 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6,
2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forced
Sale Agreement among our company, the trustee, and Garo Kholamian,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.5 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
Agreement between our company and 1551 Kingsbury Partners, L.L.C.,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.6 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
Agreement between our company and Garo Kholamian, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 6.8 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 1-U filed on October 6, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
Agreement between our company and GKPI I Partners (Lakeview
Square), LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.7 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6,
2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription
Escrow Agreement among our company, JCC Advisors, LLC and UMB Bank,
National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6.2 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 1-U filed on October 6,
2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consent
of Eide Bailly LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11)(b)
|
|
Consent
of Kaplan, Voekler, Cunningham & Frank, PLC, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 12 to the Company’s Fifth
Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering Statement on Form 1-A
filed on September 28, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
Opinion
of Kaplan, Voekler, Cunningham & Frank, PLC regarding legality
of the Bonds, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (12) to the
Company’s Fifth Pre-Qualification Amendment to its Offering
Statement on Form 1-A filed on September 28, 2016.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Regulation A, the issuer certifies that it
has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on Form 1-A and has duly caused this
offering statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the County of Cook, State of Illinois
on September 28, 2018.
|
GK Investment Holdings,
LLC,
a
Delaware limited liability company
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
GK
Development, Inc.,
|
|
|
an
Illinois corporation, Manager
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Garo
Kholamian
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Garo
Kholamian
|
|
|
|
Its:
|
Sole
Director
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
September
28, 2018
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Garo
Kholamian
|
|
|
Name:
|
Garo
Kholamian
|
|
|
Its:
|
President of our
manager (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
Date:
|
September
28, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Colin
Hartzell
|
|
|
Name:
|
Colin
Hartzell
|
|
|
Its:
|
Vice
President of Financial Planning and Control of our
manager
(Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
Date:
|
September
28, 2018
|